The article argues that the Federal Reserve's recent rate hike decision, while justifiable on inflation grounds, highlights a critical lack of an underlying, transparent policy framework. The core problem is that the Fed's decisions appear discretionary, leading to market uncertainty because the committee's judgment, rather than clear data, dictates policy shifts. The author proposes that the Fed adopt a formal monetary policy rule—an algebraic formula linking the target rate to indicators like inflation and unemployment—to replace subjective guidance. Implementing such a rule would provide market predictability, enhance transparency, and shield the Fed from political attacks by making deviations from the standard easily quantifiable.
New NAEP Results: More Evidence That the Status Quo Isn’t Working
English Summary
The latest NAEP results show that while 9-year-olds made modest gains, older students remain significantly below historical performance levels, with reading unchanged since 1971 and math only slightly improved since 1973. Despite tripling per-student spending since 1970 (now exceeding $20,000 annually), decades of centralized reforms have failed to produce improvements, indicating a fundamental accountability problem in the government monopoly system. The article argues that parental choice would create stronger incentives for school improvement than bureaucratic oversight, as families could leave underperforming schools with their funding. These persistent failures suggest that educational freedom and expanded school choice are necessary complements to address systemic underperformance.
中文摘要
最新的全國教育進度評估(NAEP)結果表明，雖然9歲兒童取得適度進展，但年長的學生仍遠低於歷史表現水平，閱讀能力自1971年以來保持停滯，數學自1973年以來僅略有改善。儘管自1970年以來人均教育支出增加了三倍（目前超過每年20,000美元），但數十年的集中式改革未能產生實質改善，反映出政府教育壟斷體制中存在根本的問責缺陷。該文章主張家長選擇權將比官僚監督為學校改善創造更強的激勵機制，因為家庭可以根據教育經費流向而離開表現不佳的學校。這些長期的失敗表明，教育自由和擴大學校選擇權是必要的補充措施，以解決系統性表現不足的問題。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The brief challenges current border policies that allow agents to search travelers' digital devices without a warrant, arguing this violates the Fourth Amendment. Cato contends that the existing 'border-search exception' is being misused to grant the government an overly broad, warrantless window into private digital lives. The core argument is that personal possession of data should not be treated as a vulnerability, while third-party cloud storage should not be treated as a refuge. If upheld, these policies transform routine border crossings into invasive investigative checkpoints, significantly eroding constitutional privacy rights.
-
3.
Congress has significantly expanded presidential tariff authority by passing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, allowing the executive to impose up to 100% tariffs on key buyers of Russian energy and sanctions enablers. The article argues that this legislation represents a dangerous abdication of Congress's Article I authority, as it grants the executive vast, discretionary power without specifying criteria for enforcement. Historically, the executive could claim tariffs were its own doing; however, by writing and passing this new authority, Congress now owns the resulting trade policy and its economic consequences. This shift implies that future tariffs will be viewed by the public as a direct legislative action, potentially undermining the administration's credibility and creating political vulnerability.
-
4.
The article argues that conventional K-12 public education is often overly bureaucratic and fails to accommodate individual student needs, stifling creativity and agency. Forest City Academy (FCA) demonstrates an alternative model utilizing state vouchers and a mastery-based curriculum that emphasizes experiential learning, small group instruction, and student choice. This approach, which integrates outdoor play and practical skills alongside limited technology, suggests that policy should expand educational freedom and market-based choice to better align learning environments with holistic child development. Such reforms challenge the status quo by promoting parental agency and decentralized educational decision-making.
-
5.Benoir v. Town of Parksley Brief: Governments Cannot Use Pretextual Reasons to Silence Critics (CATO)
This brief argues that local governments cannot use technical zoning ordinances or procedural loopholes as a pretext to suppress protected speech. The case involves a town attempting to shut down a food truck owner after the owner complained about an initial ban, using a general ordinance despite having made prior commitments. CATO contends that the district court fundamentally misunderstood First Amendment law by allowing the government to evade scrutiny based on technical legality rather than the true motive for the adverse action. If this ruling stands, it significantly weakens free speech protections, enabling local authorities to undermine civil liberties by hiding behind administrative technicalities.