ThinkTankWeekly

Middle East

773 published entries in the portal

This topic hub groups ThinkTankWeekly entries tagged Middle East and links readers back to the original publishers.

Think tanks: CFR, Chatham House, Foreign Affairs, Brookings, CSIS, USNI, CATO, RAND, INSS, IISS, Heritage

  1. 1.

    Despite significant damage to its naval fleet, shipyards, and production facilities from recent strikes, Iran is expected to quickly reconstitute its military industrial base. This reconstitution relies heavily on importing dual-use components, such as machine tools, drone parts, and marine engines, through alternative routes like Pakistan or China. To counter this threat, the report advises that policymakers must extend sanctions mechanisms—particularly 'no reexport' clauses—and proactively engage third countries with direct access to Iran. Furthermore, monitoring allied firms dealing with key suppliers in China and Turkey is crucial to slowing down and raising the cost of necessary procurements.

    Read at CSIS

  2. 2.
    2026-06-26 | europe | 2026-W26 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    Ukraine demonstrates remarkable resilience and technological adaptability despite continuous Russian attacks on civilian infrastructure and critical services. While Kyiv's military is adapting through innovative drone warfare and strikes, its long-term stability requires sustained international support to counter Russia’s escalating threats. Strategically, the U.S. must coordinate with key European powers (E3) due to shifting political attention, while immediately deploying negotiators to Ukraine to gain ground truth and plan for potential escalation scenarios.

    Read at Brookings

  3. 3.

    Africa's economic landscape is at a critical inflection point, shifting away from traditional foreign aid toward sophisticated commercial investment and private-sector co-investment. This transition is underpinned by major regional initiatives like the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), which grants African nations significant agency and negotiating leverage. Consequently, external powers must pivot their strategy from conditional development assistance to facilitating partnerships in key sectors such as digital infrastructure, energy transition, agribusiness, and critical minerals. Failure to acknowledge Africa's growing market options risks diminishing the influence of any single global partner.

    Read at CFR

  4. 4.
    2026-06-26 | economy | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine

    The Chatham House report warns of an imminent 'fifth mega-shock' to global food systems, driven by the convergence of geopolitical risks—such as disruptions in critical chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz—and resulting energy and fertilizer shortages. This vulnerability is compounded by structural weaknesses, notably the extreme concentration of staple crop reserves among a few nations, which heightens the risk of cascading inflation and widespread hunger. The analysis argues that historical shocks have failed to prompt deep systemic reforms, leaving global food security fragile and humanitarian aid strained. Policymakers must therefore urgently prioritize building resilience through supply chain diversification, avoiding nationalistic export restrictions, and coordinating international efforts to stabilize commodity markets.

    Read at Chatham House

  5. 5.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The analyst views the announced US-Iran deal as a fragile, temporary measure rather than a lasting settlement because it fails to address the core causes of conflict or resolve major outstanding issues like Iran's nuclear program. While reopening the Strait of Hormuz is welcome, true stability requires comprehensive negotiations that move beyond bilateral talks and incorporate regional stakeholders (e.g., China, Arab states). For the deal to endure, diplomatic efforts must adopt a multi-layered approach focused on building confidence among all parties and establishing clear structures for accountability and long-term support.

    Read at Chatham House

  6. 6.
    2026-06-26 | africa | 2026-W26 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that repeated atrocities in Sudan, exemplified by the anticipated violence in El Obeid following the massacre in El Fasher, demonstrate a profound failure of international powers to act decisively when warnings are issued. It notes that while global bodies and nations issue strong statements of concern, these words lack teeth because major actors fear imposing costs on external backers (like the UAE) or risking their own strategic interests. The authors conclude that meaningful intervention is hampered by geopolitical self-interest, leading to a cycle where suffering persists despite clear evidence of conflict drivers and humanitarian need.

    Read at CFR

  7. 7.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The analysis argues that both Iran and Israel operate on a zero-sum logic of regional hegemony, generating systemic instability through asymmetric warfare or unilateral military action. This dynamic threatens the Gulf states, whose core strategy is based on a 'positive-sum' model prioritizing trade, development, and stability. To counter this persistent threat, international partners must fundamentally review their engagement with these powers and assist the GCC in strengthening collective security mechanisms. Crucially, maintaining free navigation through vital waterways like the Strait of Hormuz must become an urgent priority to mitigate economic coercion.

    Read at Chatham House

  8. 8.
    2026-06-26 | defense | 2026-W26 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    Ukraine is successfully repositioning itself from a recipient of aid to an indispensable global security partner by exporting its advanced drone and interceptor technology. This shift is evidenced by securing major, multi-billion dollar defense agreements in the Persian Gulf with nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, who rely on Kyiv's tech to counter regional threats. Furthermore, Ukraine aims to become the 'arsenal of democracy' for Europe, leveraging its rapidly expanding industrial base and battlefield data for continuous innovation. Strategically, this suggests that Ukraine’s military-industrial complex will become a key determinant in reshaping global security alliances and defense architecture.

    Read at Chatham House

  9. 9.
    2026-06-26 | economy | 2026-W26 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The Iran conflict has exposed Asia's economic security to extreme vulnerability, primarily due to over-reliance on critical maritime chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz. This acute risk is compounded by a lack of great power stabilization, as major powers weaponize economic vulnerabilities rather than ensuring open trade routes. To mitigate the threat of stagflation and supply shocks, Asian nations must pivot toward collective resilience initiatives. Policy strategies should focus on establishing joint strategic reserves, expanding cross-border energy grids, and deepening regional cooperation to manage dependencies and stabilize critical commodity flows.

    Read at Brookings

  10. 10.
    2026-06-26 | diplomacy | 2026-W26 | Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    The article argues that global digital infrastructure—including undersea cables and data centers—is critically vulnerable to state attacks, as evidenced by recent disruptions in the Red Sea and Gulf. Because these systems are privately owned and cross international waters, the current legal framework is outdated and fails to assign clear responsibilities for protection or repair during conflict. This vulnerability necessitates a modernized governance approach that treats subsea cables as critical maritime infrastructure requiring stronger international law. Policymakers must therefore focus on establishing coordinated global frameworks, such as those being developed by the EU, to mandate transparency, ensure safe passage, and build resilience against geopolitical threats.

    Read at Chatham House

  11. 11.
    2026-06-26 | africa | 2026-W26 | Topics: Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    The Prosperity Party's supermajority provides political predictability for accelerated economic reforms but simultaneously creates an accountability deficit by enabling centralization of power. This push toward a statist, centralized model undermines the country’s established ethnic federalism, risking the exacerbation of deep-seated conflicts in regions like Tigray and Oromia. Strategically, this mandate removes incentives for accommodation, allowing Ethiopia to pursue increasingly assertive regional goals—such as securing sea access—which heightens geopolitical tensions with neighboring states like Eritrea and Sudan.

    Read at CSIS

  12. 12.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The analysis concludes that the conflict was a strategic failure for the U.S., citing massive costs in human life, military equipment (such as depleted Patriot missile stockpiles), and economic damage estimated at over $132 billion to consumers. Iran leveraged the crisis by weaponizing the Strait of Hormuz, forcing an agreement that grants Tehran sanctions relief and reconstruction funds without achieving regime change or fully dismantling its nuclear program. Consequently, the conflict is expected to embolden Iran, allowing it to rebuild its military capacity and fund proxy groups like Hezbollah. Strategically, the U.S. emerges with depleted resources and a weakened regional posture, while Iran gains economic stability and increased geopolitical leverage.

    Read at CFR

  13. 13.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    The article argues that US military intervention against Iran was a strategic failure, as the regime adopted a 'nothing to lose' approach, successfully escalating conflict and re-establishing regional leverage despite temporary ceasefires. While a fragile Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) has been reached regarding the Strait of Hormuz, it addresses only immediate concerns and fails to resolve critical outstanding issues, such as Iran’s nuclear stockpile or proxy support. Strategically, US policy is now heavily influenced by domestic political cycles and economic stability, suggesting that long-term geopolitical goals are being subordinated to short-term political expediency. This leaves the Middle East highly volatile, with the current ceasefire extension providing little guarantee of lasting peace.

    Read at Chatham House

  14. 14.
    2026-06-26 | economy | 2026-W26 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The global jobs challenge is bifurcated: developing nations face a massive 'demographic time bomb' due to 1.2 billion young people entering the workforce with insufficient job creation; while developed economies must adapt to labor market disruption caused by artificial intelligence. The core finding is that solving poverty and unemployment requires moving beyond fragmented projects (e.g., only building hospitals or only providing vaccines). Instead, policy must adopt a holistic approach—simultaneously developing physical infrastructure, human capital, and governance—to enable private sector growth and create sustainable opportunities for all citizens.

    Read at CFR

  15. 15.
    2026-06-26 | energy | 2026-W26 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia

    The Philippines faces acute economic vulnerability due to global energy shocks stemming from geopolitical conflicts in the Persian Gulf and potential Strait of Hormuz closures. Rising fuel prices, amplified by the nation's high reliance on imported oil and a weakening peso, are causing severe inflationary spirals that destabilize key sectors like agriculture and public transport. Although the government has implemented emergency measures, structural damage to global energy infrastructure and compounding threats—such as climate-driven agricultural disruption ('Super El Niño')—suggest sustained economic turbulence. Policymakers must therefore prepare for potential job losses, continued price volatility, and increased social instability.

    Read at Chatham House

  16. 16.
    2026-06-26 | defense | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine

    The next UK prime minister will face significant foreign policy challenges stemming from fundamental shifts in post-war relationships, particularly with the US and Europe. The core challenge lies in the US's increasing reluctance to underwrite European security and the intensifying geopolitical rivalry between the US and China. To address this strategic vacuum, the UK must execute a comprehensive 'reset,' moving beyond mere personal diplomacy. This requires establishing a longer-term defense and security relationship with European allies that can sustain rising commitments. Failure to reconcile these escalating costs and diminished American guarantees threatens Britain's ability to maintain its critical role in collective European security.

    Read at Chatham House

  17. 17.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    The CFR assesses Trump's U.S.-Iran deal as a temporary 'memorandum of understanding' rather than a comprehensive peace, arguing that its terms primarily reflect Iran’s strategic gains and priorities. While the agreement temporarily lifts maritime blockades in the Strait of Hormuz, experts caution that critical issues—including full nuclear constraint, sanctions removal, and Israel's security concerns regarding proxies—remain unresolved or favor Tehran. The deal leaves regional powers, particularly Gulf states, exposed to potential economic coercion (such as transit fees) and forces a negotiation timetable that is inherently unstable. Consequently, the MOU represents a fragile ceasefire that fails to resolve deep-seated geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

    Read at CFR

  18. 18.
    2026-06-26 | defense | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    The Brookings article argues that while a large defense budget, including the proposed $350 billion mandatory funding pot, is necessary given geopolitical challenges posed by rivals like China and Russia, the current proposal lacks democratic accountability. The author stresses that the specific spending categories are largely reasonable—particularly investments in the industrial base and next-generation technology—but must be implemented with proper oversight. Crucially, the funds should not be delivered as a single, unconstrained pot of money. Instead, Congress must mandate that this funding be spread out over the decade through bipartisan debate and rigorous annual reevaluation to maintain checks and balances.

    Read at Brookings

  19. 19.
    2026-06-26 | china_indopacific | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The fallout from the Iran war significantly erodes international law and increases regional vulnerability to maritime chokepoint weaponization across Southeast Asia. This instability, compounded by global tariffs, is rapidly diminishing confidence in U.S. leadership among local elites, who are increasingly weighing China's economic influence against perceived American unreliability. For policy, Washington must urgently realign its actions with international law and bolster maritime domain awareness in critical straits like Malacca. Furthermore, the U.S. must rebuild trust by demonstrating greater consideration for allied concerns and mitigating economic costs to prevent a strategic shift toward Beijing.

    Read at Brookings

  20. 20.
    2026-06-26 | europe | 2026-W26 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine

    The article argues that Hungary’s emerging 'reset' with Ukraine represents a significant strategic positive for European deterrence. By resolving the Transcarpathia minority dispute, the new government shifts from outright obstruction to conditional cooperation, removing a major political impediment to Kyiv's EU accession talks. This development reduces Russia's ability to exploit internal divisions within the EU and NATO by demonstrating that Europe can manage disputes without succumbing to strategic paralysis. Ultimately, this process is crucial for restoring credibility to the continent’s collective resolve regarding Ukraine's future.

    Read at Chatham House

  21. 21.
    2026-06-26 | europe | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine

    Recent analyses emphasize that modern conflict requires integrating technological shifts, environmental accountability, and deep historical context into strategic planning. Key findings include how smartphones are fundamentally changing warfare through 'the stack' of global communications, and the necessity of applying international law concepts like 'ecocide' to document war damage (e.g., in Ukraine). Furthermore, effective intelligence demands a rigorous social science approach—as demonstrated by the professionalization of CIA analysis—and requires understanding regional powers, such as Iran, on their own strategic terms rather than through caricature. Policy implications mandate that national security strategies must anticipate tech-driven escalation while building analytical frameworks that account for environmental and historical dimensions.

    Read at Chatham House

  22. 22.
    2026-06-26 | economy | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The analysis suggests that while the Federal Reserve has a strong historical record of navigating economic crises, institutional modernization is necessary for sustained effectiveness under new leadership. This shift is evidenced by the establishment of task forces, which bring in external experts to provide fresh perspectives on core functions. These initiatives are strategically focused on improving communication clarity and reinforcing the inflation mandate. Consequently, the Fed's policy strategy points toward greater transparency and adaptability, signaling a commitment to structural reform despite potential internal resistance to change.

    Read at CFR

  23. 23.
    2026-06-26 | economy | 2026-W26 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The central finding is that sustainable poverty reduction requires a strategic shift from fragmented development aid to prioritizing smart job creation as the most effective tool for empowering populations. This urgency is underscored by a massive demographic bulge of young people in emerging markets, which poses a significant national security and economic risk if insufficient jobs are created. Policy recommendations emphasize adopting integrated strategies that link employment opportunities to holistic infrastructure development—including health, education, and clean energy—rather than funding single-issue projects. Crucially, governments must focus on building productive capacity and mobilizing private capital to ensure scalable, dignified job growth.

    Read at CFR

  24. 24.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    The US-Iran ceasefire MOU represents an unequal draw, meaning neither side achieved a decisive victory but instead secured concessions that allow both parties to buy time. Both Washington and Tehran are leveraging their respective strengths—military superiority versus regional disruptive capacity—to drive negotiations. The resulting talks will be highly contentious, requiring simultaneous compromises on four fronts: reopening the Strait of Hormuz, nuclear restrictions, sanctions relief, and security guarantees. Strategically, Iran retains enough leverage regarding its regional influence to resist American demands, while Washington must manage deep-seated mistrust to finalize any agreement.

    Read at Chatham House

  25. 25.
    2026-06-26 | energy | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The U.S. electric vehicle market faces significant uncertainty due to federal policy retrenchment, which has withdrawn major subsidies and weakened regulatory standards for clean vehicles. Consequently, state policies are becoming critically important, prompting this analysis to benchmark how well states utilize their specific policy levers—such as ZEV mandates, consumer incentives, and charging infrastructure rules—to maintain EV momentum. The report argues that sustained EV adoption requires a robust, multi-faceted approach at the state level to compensate for the loss of federal support. This suggests that policymakers must prioritize comprehensive state-level action across all pillars (incentives, standards, infrastructure) to ensure continuous market growth.

    Read at Brookings

  26. 26.
    2026-06-26 | society | 2026-W26 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    Mexican cartels, including Sinaloa and CJNG, have established a significant global footprint, expanding far beyond Mexico and the U.S. into Europe, Africa, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America. The primary threat involves shifting from cocaine to highly potent synthetic drugs like methamphetamine and fentanyl, establishing production labs across diverse international regions while diversifying into human trafficking and illegal mining. This transnational reach undermines traditional law enforcement efforts by creating resilient, redundant supply chains and laundering networks worldwide. Policy must therefore prioritize enhanced international intelligence sharing, dismantling clandestine drug laboratories, and addressing local corruption to effectively counter this complex global criminal threat.

    Read at Brookings

  27. 27.
    2026-06-26 | economy | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The article argues that global supply chains are critically vulnerable and dependent on a few narrow maritime chokepoints, suggesting future disruptions could surpass those seen at Hormuz. Key risks highlighted include the Taiwan Strait (due to its role in semiconductor manufacturing), the Strait of Malacca (facing piracy and sanctions evasion), and the Mozambique Channel (rich in energy but unstable). The analysis concludes that existing international legal frameworks are inadequate for modern geopolitical realities, forcing major powers toward military coercion and necessitating urgent strategic planning to safeguard global trade routes.

    Read at Chatham House

  28. 28.
    2026-06-26 | tech | 2026-W26 | Topics: AI, China, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    Anthropic warns that AI's rapid advancement toward 'recursive self-improvement' poses an existential threat by potentially surpassing human control and creating autonomous cyber weapons. This warning is supported by evidence of exponential acceleration in model capabilities and code generation, suggesting a loss of human oversight is imminent. The primary policy implication is the urgent need for a multilateral global arms control regime to manage this risk. However, implementing such controls faces immense challenges from geopolitical rivalry (particularly China's role) and the sheer speed at which technological innovation is accelerating.

    Read at CFR

  29. 29.

    The global economy faces a paradox of slowing growth amid massive technological investment booms, driven by geopolitical headwinds like Middle East conflicts. Analysts argue that these crises are accelerating the strategic importance of 'chokepoints'—both physical and financial—forcing a fundamental shift in global trade strategy. Consequently, nations must pivot from prioritizing pure efficiency to building systemic redundancy and resilience across energy supplies and supply chains. Policymakers should therefore focus on de-risking critical infrastructure and diversifying sources to mitigate vulnerability to geopolitical shocks, especially within developing economies.

    Read at CFR

  30. 30.
    2026-06-26 | society | 2026-W26 | Topics: AI, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States

    South Korea successfully navigated a severe constitutional crisis—triggered by an attempted martial law declaration—demonstrating significant democratic resilience despite intense political polarization. Key to this stability was the swift and independent action of the Constitutional Court, which upheld impeachment charges against the former president, thereby reinforcing judicial checks on executive power. Furthermore, the subsequent administration has prioritized national unity and pragmatic governance over partisan conflict, focusing heavily on economic revival through AI investment and strengthening regional alliances. This episode offers a critical model for other democracies grappling with democratic backsliding, underscoring that robust institutional safeguards and an independent judiciary are vital bulwarks against political instability.

    Read at Brookings

  31. 31.
    2026-06-26 | energy | 2026-W26 | Topics: Climate, Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine

    The Chatham House analysis concludes that even a reopening of the Strait of Hormuz will fail to resolve Europe’s fundamental energy vulnerability due to structural market shifts. Geopolitical conflicts have severely damaged key supply sources, particularly Qatar's LNG capacity, forcing Europe into increased reliance on US natural gas (reaching 63% in Q1 2026). This dependency exposes the continent to potential energy coercion by the United States and undermines its strategic autonomy. Furthermore, limited current supplies coupled with planned massive US expansion will keep prices elevated and deepen global market integration, complicating Europe's path toward energy security.

    Read at Chatham House

  32. 32.
    2026-06-26 | energy | 2026-W26 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade

    Despite an interim peace deal for the Strait of Hormuz, regional maritime security remains fragile and uncertain. The process of reopening is hampered by slow demining efforts and unresolved administrative issues, while simultaneously, the Houthis in Yemen retain the threat capability to close Bab al-Mandab, impacting alternative shipping routes through the Red Sea and Suez Canal. Future chokepoint closures would trigger severe global ripple effects, driving up insurance premiums, increasing transportation costs, and causing inflationary spikes across energy markets. This instability threatens disproportionately impact vulnerable import-dependent economies, potentially forcing nations to negotiate bilateral transit agreements with regional powers.

    Read at Chatham House

  33. 33.
    2026-06-26 | china_indopacific | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that Beijing is pursuing a 'China first' strategy: maximizing global reach and projecting great-power status without assuming the binding commitments or costs of traditional superpower leadership. Evidence shows China avoids formal alliances, instead favoring flexible, transactional partnerships across diverse regions to expand influence while minimizing risk, particularly as US global confidence declines. While this approach offers short-term strategic advantages by allowing Beijing to maintain distance from regional crises, the analysis warns that it ultimately weakens alignment and fosters a more unstable international order, posing long-term risks to China's own interests.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  34. 34.
    2026-06-26 | europe | 2026-W26 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Trade, United States

    Laurel Rapp argues that US foreign policy has undergone a fundamental shift, asserting that 'there’s no going back' to the stability or predictability of the past decade. This change is driven by eroded trust in American steadiness, forcing both Washington and global partners to define a new strategic vision. While the immediate direction remains uncertain pending elections, the underlying trend suggests the US will continue to push allies, particularly Europe, toward shouldering greater defense burdens and mutual security responsibilities.

    Read at Chatham House

  35. 35.

    The Iran War exposed Asia's critically fragile dependence on Middle Eastern energy, transforming an abstract vulnerability into a severe economic emergency marked by inflation and rationing across the region. In response, Asian nations are accelerating diversification efforts—boosting solar capacity, pursuing nuclear power, and securing alternative suppliers like Russia and the US. However, these ambitions face significant structural hurdles, including inadequate grid infrastructure, persistent reliance on coal, and weak regional coordination (e.g., ASEAN). The primary strategic implication is that rapid, coordinated investment in renewables and cross-border energy grids is essential; failure to achieve this will severely constrain Asia's economic growth and escalate global energy risk.

    Read at CFR

  36. 36.
    2026-06-26 | diplomacy | 2026-W26 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine

    While Macron's Evian G7 successfully facilitated dialogue and included emerging economies, the summit ultimately highlighted significant structural limitations within the group under President Trump’s leadership. Key outcomes were constrained by US 'America first' positions, leading the G7 to avoid deep policy discussions on core issues like climate change or comprehensive global governance. Although declarations were made regarding Ukraine support and critical minerals cooperation, the inability of members to share core values or address systemic risks (e.g., AI regulation) signals a functional gap in current multilateral frameworks. Policymakers must therefore recognize that the G7 requires an urgent overhaul of its format to effectively tackle complex global challenges.

    Read at Chatham House

  37. 37.
    2026-06-26 | europe | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the post-war transatlantic security order provided by the US is dissolving, rendering Europe’s reliance on NATO increasingly precarious due to American transactional behavior. Key evidence includes recent US threats regarding territorial claims (like Greenland) and military maneuvers, which demonstrate a willingness to treat alliances as negotiable assets rather than shared values. Consequently, achieving genuine European security autonomy requires moving beyond mere defense spending; the strategy must focus on building three interconnected pillars: industrial self-sufficiency, technological sovereignty (e.g., independent satellite constellations), and energy decoupling from US markets.

    Read at Chatham House

  38. 38.
    2026-06-26 | china_indopacific | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that U.S. demands for dramatically increased defense spending are alienating Asian allies, pushing them toward independent security planning or closer alignment with China. Key evidence includes Washington's insistence on unsustainable GDP percentages and its perceived unreliability—evidenced by conditional security assurances and a soft stance toward Beijing. This strategic disconnect is causing regional powers to pursue nuclear ambitions and build military capacity independently of the U.S., accelerating an arms race. The implication is that the collapse of the U.S.-led alliance structure in Asia hands China significant geopolitical influence, increasing regional instability and making the Indo-Pacific more prone to conflict.

    Read at CFR

  39. 39.
    2026-06-26 | energy | 2026-W26 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The Red Sea represents a critical maritime choke point whose instability poses an acute threat to global trade and energy security, potentially rivaling the historical significance of the Strait of Hormuz. The primary risk stems from Houthi actions in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which controls a vital artery used by 12–15% of global maritime commerce, alongside hosting critical undersea digital cables. Sustained disruption would trigger severe supply chain delays, drive up energy prices globally, and destabilize regional economies dependent on these routes. Therefore, international policy must prioritize securing freedom of navigation to prevent cascading economic crises.

    Read at CFR

  40. 40.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Turkey urges NATO members to adopt a 'pan-continental' view of European security, arguing that reliance solely on EU structures and the eastern front is insufficient. The article notes that current geopolitical crises in the south—such as the Gaza war and unresolved tensions over Iran—demonstrate Europe’s diplomatic limitations and need for reorientation. Consequently, any new security framework must broaden cooperation among all alliance partners and integrate non-military issues like energy security, supply chains, and trade corridors to effectively address the wider neighborhood's instability.

    Read at Chatham House

  41. 41.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade

    The Chatham House analysis concludes that the US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding is legally ambiguous and politically fragile, functioning more as a face-saving device than a robust peace treaty. While the agreement mandates significant US concessions—including removing military threats and lifting sanctions—it lacks formal binding mechanisms and relies on vague commitments regarding reconstruction funds or maritime passage fees. The MoU forces the US to nominally adhere to international law (like non-interference) and rely on multilateral institutions, contradicting its recent actions. Consequently, analysts warn that key provisions, such as regional stability from non-signatories like Israel, are unlikely to materialize, suggesting continued geopolitical risk despite the paper deal.

    Read at Chatham House

  42. 42.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    CSIS estimates the total incremental cost of the recent U.S. campaign against Iran to be between $34 billion and $42 billion, despite a ceasefire being negotiated. The primary costs are munitions ($26.1B), base damage, and equipment losses; however, successful operations—such as suppressing Iranian air defenses and shifting to cheaper short-range weapons—significantly reduced the daily expenditure later in the conflict. Because current DOD budget proposals do not account for these massive war expenses, Congress must address how this funding gap will be covered. This suggests a critical need for strategic review regarding future military resource allocation and long-term force posture in the region.

    Read at CSIS

  43. 43.
    2026-06-26 | americas | 2026-W26 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The twin earthquakes in Venezuela test the U.S.'s ability to deliver large-scale disaster relief, particularly given the country's pre-existing humanitarian crisis and political sensitivity. The article details that following the transfer of foreign assistance from USAID to the State Department, the U.S. is mobilizing specialized assets like Disaster Assistance Response Teams (DARTs) and Urban Search and Rescue (USR) teams. For policy makers, this highlights the critical need for maintaining robust coordination between civilian agencies (State Dept.) and military resources (DoD) during sudden-onset disasters. The effectiveness of the U.S. response will serve as a key indicator of its operational capacity in the Western Hemisphere.

    Read at CFR

  44. 44.
    2026-06-26 | defense | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that while the G7 achieved a fragile consensus on Iran and Ukraine, European leaders must prioritize building strategic independence rather than relying on transatlantic alignment. This fragility stems from concerns that US commitments—particularly regarding Ukraine negotiations or implementation of agreements—may be unreliable or insufficient. Consequently, Europe and Ukraine must adopt a two-track strategy: pursuing cooperation with Washington while simultaneously dramatically increasing their own defense production capacity to define their negotiating terms independently.

    Read at CFR

  45. 45.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    The Brookings analysis argues that while the US-Israel war in Iran has diverted global attention from Israel-Palestine, unresolved structural inequities and grievances remain the primary drivers of regional instability. Key evidence points to continued Israeli settlement expansion in the West Bank and persistent attacks on Gaza, compounded by a growing divergence among key Arab Gulf states. Strategically, the report advises that Washington must refocus diplomatic energy on addressing these root causes; otherwise, failure to achieve a just solution for Palestinians will continue to fuel conflict and regionalize instability across the Middle East.

    Read at Brookings

  46. 46.
    2026-06-26 | china_indopacific | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    The article argues that American sea power faces limits not from singular crises, but from persistent "maritime disorder," a condition driven by three overlapping factors: coercive disruption, structural misalignment favoring China's industrial dominance, and systemic vulnerabilities in global infrastructure. These disorders are mutually reinforcing, eroding the underlying security of critical maritime chokepoints and supply chains. Consequently, simply rebuilding the fleet is insufficient; policy must shift from managing discrete crises to developing a comprehensive strategic framework that treats maritime disorder as a continuous operational reality. Failure to adopt this holistic approach risks allowing China to gain advantage in an increasingly contested global commons.

    Read at Brookings

  47. 47.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    The US and Iran have reached a preliminary Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) aimed at reopening the Strait of Hormuz, which is expected to stabilize global oil markets by restoring critical shipping lanes. While this initial pact addresses immediate military ceasefires and provides a framework for negotiations on sanctions relief, major contentious issues remain unresolved. Key sticking points include the full disposition of Iran's nuclear program, limits on its missile capabilities, and whether Iran will halt funding its regional proxies. Consequently, while the MOU offers short-term stability and economic relief, long-term regional security hinges on successfully negotiating these deeply entrenched and difficult outstanding disputes.

    Read at CFR

  48. 48.
    2026-06-26 | health | 2026-W26 | Topics: Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States

    The analysis warns that a Super El Niño, compounded by accelerating climate change, presents an imminent threat of record-breaking global temperatures. Extreme heat is identified as the deadliest climate hazard, causing massive annual mortality and projected economic losses exceeding $2 trillion by 2030. To mitigate this systemic risk, policy must shift from reactive emergency funding to proactive governance. Key strategies include implementing national Heat Early Warning Systems (HEWS), establishing designated local officials, and investing in resilient infrastructure like cool roofs and parametric insurance for vulnerable workers.

    Read at CFR

  49. 49.
    2026-06-26 | china_indopacific | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Taiwan, Trade

    The curated reading list highlights a global environment defined by intense, multi-faceted competition across technology, resources, and great power rivalry. Central arguments focus on systemic vulnerabilities, such as the struggle for AI dominance and the geopolitical implications of critical mineral supply chains (e.g., the Congo). Key evidence points to China's extraordinary industrial capacity and its deep integration into global systems, which dictates much of the West’s strategic action. Policy implications suggest that national strategy must pivot from traditional diplomacy toward securing resilient supply chains, managing technological decoupling risks, and addressing resource exploitation to navigate escalating geopolitical instability.

    Read at Chatham House

  50. 50.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, United States

    The escalation of conflict involving Iran and Israel poses significant global risks that extend far beyond the Middle East region. Key concerns highlighted include the vulnerability of critical maritime chokepoints, such as the Strait of Hormuz, and the potential for geopolitical instability to trigger widespread global food crises. Strategically, regional powers must overcome internal divisions to counter external dominance efforts in the area. Furthermore, Europe faces a pressing need to redefine its defense posture while addressing critical dependencies on major global partners.

    Read at Chatham House

  51. 51.
    2026-06-26 | diplomacy | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine

    Russia’s increased diplomacy in Asia successfully mitigates Western efforts to isolate Moscow but fundamentally fails to achieve its core objective: a favorable political settlement regarding Ukraine. While non-Western partners, including ASEAN and China, maintain pragmatic economic ties with Russia out of self-interest, these relationships do not translate into strategic endorsement of Moscow's war aims or leadership role. This dependency on external support for resilience does not equate to diplomatic victory, confirming that the conflict will remain protracted and complex. Therefore, while Western isolation efforts have faltered, Russia lacks the necessary international consensus to dictate peace terms in Europe.

    Read at Chatham House

  52. 52.
    2026-06-26 | diplomacy | 2026-W26 | Topics: Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    Freedman argues that the current state of American foreign policy under Trump represents a level of systemic chaos unprecedented in his 50-year career, surpassing past periods of instability. This disorder is attributed to an impulsive, ill-informed executive coupled with a hollowed-out federal apparatus, weakening key diplomatic institutions like the State Department and NSC. The primary implication for global strategy is that this institutional decay will have long-lasting effects on international relationships and capabilities (e.g., health and development aid). Policymakers must therefore navigate a period of profound uncertainty until US governmental structures can stabilize.

    Read at Chatham House

  53. 53.
    2026-06-26 | middle_east | 2026-W26 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The article argues that while recent conflict has devastated Lebanon, the current U.S.-Iran diplomatic window offers a rare opportunity to restore sovereignty and stability. Achieving this requires external powers to push for two core elements: securing a phased Israeli withdrawal from occupied territories and empowering the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) to assume full security control. Strategically, any resolution must mandate the removal of foreign military influence (IRGC/Hezbollah's non-state role) alongside state authority. For Lebanon to capitalize on this opening, it must proactively pursue domestic reforms—including economic recovery and expanding state control—while engaging in political dialogue with all armed groups.

    Read at CSIS

  54. 54.
    2026-06-26 | economy | 2026-W26 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The analysis suggests that the Federal Reserve, under new leadership, is undergoing significant structural reforms to enhance its operational effectiveness and transparency. This effort is evidenced by the establishment of multiple task forces involving external experts, who will focus on improving data collection and clarifying the inflation mandate. While these changes are necessary for modernizing the institution's dual mandate, their successful implementation must navigate potential resistance from long-tenured staff members comfortable with the status quo.

    Read at CFR

  55. 55.
    2026-06-25 | defense | 2026-W26 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    CATO argues that the proposed defense supplemental budget represents wasteful and unnecessary spending, largely driven by reactive measures related to the war in Iran. The article highlights that significant portions of this funding are dedicated to operational expenses and resupplying depleted munitions inventories. Furthermore, it notes that actual military outlays are consistently underreported because multiple agencies contribute funds outside the Department of Defense. Consequently, the continuous expansion of defense spending is deemed fiscally irresponsible, adding billions to an already excessive budget without providing clear benefits to American taxpayers.

    Read at CATO

  56. 56.
    2026-06-23 | economy | 2026-W26 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    The article argues that increased immigration significantly undermines labor unions by introducing ethnic, linguistic, and religious diversity among the workforce. This diversity raises the transaction costs required for collective action, making it difficult for workers to organize into powerful union movements. From a free-market perspective, this decline in union power is viewed as beneficial because it reduces political pressure for progressive, anti-capitalist policies and helps preserve economic freedom. The research suggests that weaker unions translate directly into less state intervention and greater market flexibility.

    Read at CATO

  57. 57.

    The RAND report assesses clinical quality management (CQM) in the Military Health System (MHS), finding that while permanent facilities (MTFs) maintain robust safety processes, monitoring care across diverse Operational Clinical Services (OCS) is severely hampered by inconsistent location data and variable infrastructure. The analysis concludes that applying a uniform standard for patient safety is inappropriate due to the extreme variability of OCS settings—ranging from planes to fixed bases—which necessitates flexible oversight. Policy recommendations emphasize developing tailored, site-specific quality assurance mechanisms for operational environments while continuing to strengthen core CQM processes within established military treatment facilities.

    Read at RAND

  58. 58.
    2026-06-19 | middle_east | 2026-W25 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    The recent cease-fire between Iran and the US represents a strategic stalemate, not a conclusive victory for either side. Tehran gained significant leverage by demonstrating its resilience and successfully using control of the Strait of Hormuz to create global energy shortages, forcing Washington to abandon its maximalist goals. The article argues that the U.S. must therefore shift away from planning for outright defeat and instead adopt a strategy of peaceful containment. This requires leveraging regional partners, particularly Gulf monarchies, through security assistance and targeted economic pressure, rather than attempting costly military conflict.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  59. 59.
    2026-06-18 | middle_east | 2026-W25 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    Although Iran emerged from recent conflict strengthened by its control over the Strait of Hormuz—which it views as an 'economic nuclear weapon'—the article argues that attempting to monetize or restrict passage risks undermining its long-term stability. Evidence suggests that imposing fees on global shipping will accelerate international efforts to find alternative maritime routes, thereby diminishing the deterrent value of the strait for future adversaries. Consequently, Iran must resist the temptation to punish rivals and instead adopt a conciliatory approach; overplaying its hand could jeopardize peace and make sustainable regional normalization impossible.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  60. 60.
    2026-06-18 | middle_east | 2026-W25 | Topics: Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, United States

    The U.S. has lifted its naval blockade on Iranian ports following a 60-day Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Tehran, signaling an immediate de-escalation of hostilities. This agreement mandates the phased end of conflict, including Iran's commitment to removing military obstacles and conducting demining operations within 30 days. While U.S. forces will withdraw from proximity to Iran shortly, naval assets remain temporarily in the Middle East to ensure adherence to the terms. The MOU also guarantees safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz without charge for two months, though long-term governance of this critical chokepoint remains unresolved.

    Read at USNI

  61. 61.
    2026-06-18 | defense | 2026-W25 | Topics: AI, China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    The proposed FY27 National Defense Authorization Act authorizes a substantial, historic increase in defense spending to maintain American deterrence against a complex global threat environment. This funding is justified by the rise of an 'axis of aggressors' (including China, Russia, and Iran) and the shift toward sophisticated, remote warfare utilizing AI, space weapons, and cognitive conflict. Strategically, the NDAA mandates modernizing military capabilities by shoring up traditional platforms while aggressively adopting emerging technologies. Furthermore, the legislation includes reforms designed to streamline Pentagon budgeting, ensuring that increased investment is efficiently allocated for 21st-century readiness.

    Read at USNI

  62. 62.

    The negotiated end of the Iran conflict represents a significant foreign policy failure for the United States, severely eroding its regional credibility and ability to guarantee stability. This vacuum is driving Middle Eastern states away from U.S. dependence, causing a sharp geopolitical realignment into rival coalitions (e.g., the Abrahamic bloc versus the Saudi-led Islamic coalition). Consequently, regional powers are asserting greater autonomy, while global competitors like China capitalize on this shift. Policymakers must recognize that the region is moving toward decentralized security arrangements, signaling a broader global trend of questioning U.S.-centered diplomatic and military structures.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  63. 63.
    2026-06-17 | middle_east | 2026-W25 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The USS Mitscher completed a demanding 11-month deployment, demonstrating sustained operational readiness and advanced anti-air/anti-submarine capabilities. This period coincided with significant regional escalation in the Middle East, including U.S.-Israeli strikes against Iranian targets and subsequent attempts by Iran to disrupt commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. The necessity for a U.S. naval blockade underscores the volatile nature of critical global chokepoints. Strategically, Mitscher's deployment highlights the enduring requirement for robust forward military presence and power projection in the region to manage geopolitical flashpoints and deter state-level aggression.

    Read at USNI

  64. 64.
    2026-06-16 | defense | 2026-W25 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the current perceived crisis within NATO is not unprecedented but follows a predictable pattern of tension and resolution. Historically, these crises stem from two perennial sources: disagreements over burden sharing (American complaints about European defense spending) and disputes regarding out-of-area military operations. Despite severe ruptures in the past, the alliance has always endured because members' shared security interests outweigh the cost of dissolution. Therefore, NATO is likely to survive, provided its member states continue to find common ground despite political disagreements.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  65. 65.

    The report argues that while the U.S. remains a dominant defense supplier, partner nations are increasingly selecting non-U.S. alternatives due to complex motivations beyond mere cost or functionality. Analysis of eight case studies demonstrates that purchasing decisions are driven by strategic considerations, such as enhancing regional autonomy, strengthening ties with specific allies (e.g., Japan or Korea), and responding to perceived local vulnerabilities. For U.S. policy, the findings imply a need for greater anticipatory engagement; rather than solely focusing on sales, the U.S. should prioritize building trilateral partnerships, offering production licensing incentives, and adapting its security cooperation strategy to remain relevant when direct solutions are unavailable.

    Read at RAND

  66. 66.
    2026-06-16 | middle_east | 2026-W25 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    While a cease-fire agreement between Washington and Tehran may temporarily halt fighting, analysts argue this marks not an end to conflict, but a shift toward a 'New Grand Strategy' for Iran. This strategy emphasizes leveraging regional assets, particularly control over the Strait of Hormuz, as its primary source of economic and strategic power. For policymakers, the key takeaway is that future negotiations—including those on nuclear issues—will hinge entirely on U.S. credibility and willingness to provide meaningful concessions. Therefore, policy must pivot from military containment to managing Iran's deep-seated economic leverage and anticipating how it will use its regional choke points as tools of deterrence.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  67. 67.
    2026-06-16 | middle_east | 2026-W25 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that Washington's focus on quantitative military achievements against Iran creates a 'power paradox.' While U.S. forces have demonstrated overwhelming conventional superiority—evidenced by thousands of sorties and the destruction of key Iranian infrastructure—this metric alone misrepresents the true strategic outcome. The analysis suggests that simply degrading enemy hardware is insufficient for achieving lasting regional stability or fundamentally altering the power balance in the Middle East. Policymakers must therefore move beyond military metrics to address deeper geopolitical, economic, and diplomatic challenges.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  68. 68.
    2026-06-12 | diplomacy | 2026-W24 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Trade, United States

    The article examines Turkey's gradual strategic repositioning away from its traditional Western alignment, arguing that unlike past episodes of friction—such as the 2003 Iraq access vote, the 2010 Iran sanctions dissent, and the 2017 S-400 purchase—the current shift represents a more structural realignment rather than a transactional dispute. Ankara is diversifying its security and economic partnerships while maintaining its NATO membership, leveraging its geographic position to extract concessions from multiple power centers. The analysis suggests Western policymakers should treat Turkey less as an ally drifting off course and more as an increasingly autonomous actor pursuing a multi-vector foreign policy, with significant implications for NATO cohesion, Middle East diplomacy, and energy corridor politics.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  69. 69.
    2026-06-12 | defense | 2026-W24 | Topics: Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Trade, Ukraine

    The UK's Defence Investment Plan must finally break with endemic dishonesty in defence policy that has systematically misaligned strategic ambitions with actual resources. Decades of promises to achieve 'more with less' through efficiency savings and technological fixes have failed, as evidenced by the UK's inability to mount a rapid maritime response during the 2026 Gulf crisis. The DIP must confront hard tradeoffs between expensive domestic procurement and open-market solutions, and make explicit choices between homeland/Arctic defence or global force projection—a choice obscured by strategic ambiguity for decades. Without such honesty about costs and capabilities, the plan risks repeating past failures and further undermining credibility with NATO allies. The critical test will be whether the DIP finally aligns realistic resources with achievable strategic goals rather than continuing rhetorical ambitions unsupported by budgets.

    Read at Chatham House

  70. 70.
    2026-06-12 | defense | 2026-W24 | Topics: China, Cybersecurity, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    The 2026 World Cup across the U.S., Canada, and Mexico presents a uniquely expanded cyber threat landscape due to its vast digital infrastructure spanning three jurisdictions, millions of devices, and concurrent geopolitical tensions with Russia and Iran. Primary threats include large-scale cybercrime targeting tournament-goers through fraud and phishing, state actors seeking to disrupt critical infrastructure to damage host nations' credibility, and espionage operations targeting world leaders and officials. While the U.S. has established comprehensive preparedness measures including a White House task force and CISA coordination, vulnerabilities remain in funding adequacy and cyber security mandates for local jurisdictions. Long-term implications include establishing improved cyber security standards and resilience capabilities for future major international events.

    Read at CSIS

  71. 71.
    2026-06-12 | middle_east | 2026-W24 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    Following US-Israeli strikes that killed Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei, Iran's regime retaliated with missile and drone attacks while blockading the Strait of Hormuz, disrupting 20% of global oil and LNG supplies. The conflict has exposed critical US naval shortfalls, strained American alliances, enabled Chinese strategic expansion, and triggered months of energy market disruption and economic instability. The war exemplifies how US-led Middle Eastern military interventions produce widespread unintended consequences, from maritime chokepoint politicization to rebalancing of great power competition.

    Read at Brookings

  72. 72.
    2026-06-12 | diplomacy | 2026-W24 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    The Food for Peace program, transferred from USAID to USDA following the 2025 DOGE dismantling, now prioritizes U.S. agricultural interests over humanitarian needs, bypassing countries facing famine including Sudan, Somalia, and South Sudan in favor of seven selected recipients. New procurement rules require 100-percent U.S. commodities and expensive U.S.-flag shipping, consuming resources needed for operational costs like inland transport and distribution. The underlying "trade over aid" agenda treats hunger assistance as a means to create markets for U.S. farmers through tariff reductions, repeating the failed Haiti model of deepening dependency rather than reducing it. Without expanding recipient countries, revising procurement rules, and returning coordination to the State Department, the program risks undermining both humanitarian outcomes and agricultural support goals.

    Read at CFR

  73. 73.

    The article argues that Russia's prolonged war in Ukraine and the U.S.'s 2026 Iran conflict have revealed the limits of superpower dominance, as both Putin and Trump's military miscalculations have trapped them in costly, unwinnable conflicts that are undermining their global credibility. Ukraine and Iran, despite being militarily weaker, have inflicted massive casualties and costs on their attackers, forcing both superpowers to recognize they cannot impose their will and are losing traditional allies seeking independent security arrangements. The simultaneous distraction of both superpowers is accelerating a shift toward decentralized global security, with Europe recognizing Ukraine as a credible military asset and developing independent defense capabilities rather than relying on American guarantees. The article recommends that regional groupings like the Joint Expeditionary Force take a leading role in security coordination and that Europe facilitate an end to the Russia-Ukraine war independent of U.S. involvement.

    Read at Brookings

  74. 74.
    2026-06-12 | middle_east | 2026-W24 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    The article argues that the 2026 Iran war and post-October 7 context have significantly weakened Hezbollah and created an unprecedented opportunity to neutralize its military threat and strengthen the Lebanese state—but only through sustained U.S.-led efforts combining security capacity-building for the Lebanese Armed Forces, diplomatic coordination between Israel and Lebanon, and economic reconstruction that allows the government to deliver services Hezbollah has traditionally provided. Hezbollah's leadership is decapitated, its Iranian and Syrian sponsors weakened, and even its Shia base is fractured by resentment over the war's devastation, yet the Lebanese government and military remain too weak for direct confrontation without risking state collapse. The author identifies Iran as the critical constraint: Tehran will not negotiate away Hezbollah and will use any sanctions relief to revive its surrogate, requiring Washington to monitor and coordinate the Iran, Israel, and Lebanon tracks simultaneously. Success requires patience, credible state service delivery that prevents re-marginalization of the Shia, and sustained U.S. leadership—a narrow window unlikely to remain open without American attention.

    Read at Brookings

  75. 75.
    2026-06-12 | economy | 2026-W24 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The 2026 World Cup, hosted primarily in the United States, is unlikely to deliver FIFA's predicted $40 billion revenue windfall due to travel bans targeting fans from Haiti, Iran, Ivory Coast, and Senegal; record-high ticket prices (some exceeding $32,000); and visa-related safety concerns. Early indicators confirm significant shortfalls—80% of hotels in U.S. host cities report bookings below forecast, with 176,000 unsold tickets across the opening phase, indicating attendance will fall well short of the projected 10 million U.S. visitors. The U.S. tourism industry, already declining by 5.5% in foreign visitors last year, is unlikely to experience the anticipated economic recovery, with the American Hotel and Lodging Association describing the tournament as a 'non-event' relative to original expectations.

    Read at CFR

  76. 76.
    2026-06-12 | diplomacy | 2026-W24 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Cybersecurity, Europe, Middle East, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    France's 2026 G7 presidency, designed around economic resilience and reduced dependence on China, faces disruption from geopolitical shocks (Iran's Strait of Hormuz closure) and Trump's unpredictable 'America First' agenda. While Trump's priorities on economic security and critical supply chains partially align with French goals, significant divisions persist on Ukraine, trade, digital sovereignty, and climate policy—driving other G7 members to coordinate more independently. Macron's success may be measured less by advancing his formal agenda than by preventing mounting tensions from fracturing the fragile G7 coalition.

    Read at CFR

  77. 77.
    2026-06-12 | middle_east | 2026-W24 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    The U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure in 2025-2026 represent the end of diplomatic nonproliferation efforts, replacing negotiated agreements with Israel's 'mowing the grass' strategy of recurring military strikes. After decades where the JCPOA and IAEA inspections failed to gain durable support, Israel shifted to preemption following the October 7 attacks and Iranian protests in 2026. Rather than build large underground facilities, Iran will likely pursue decentralized nuclear programs using small, concealed workshops to evade detection and satellite surveillance. This marks the effective collapse of the global nonproliferation regime, as the deterrence value of nuclear weapons has never been higher and no arms control processes now constrain production. The U.S. remains committed to the Middle East despite decades seeking to pivot to East Asia, with significant implications for regional stability and global commodity flows.

    Read at CFR

  78. 78.

    The U.S. failed to exploit China's vulnerabilities during a 2025 trade war, revealing a fundamental gap in Washington's strategy—the absence of competitive leverage over Beijing. When China weaponized rare-earth elements in April 2025, the Trump administration quickly backed down, demonstrating Beijing's effective use of coercive economic pressure while the U.S. pursued only defensive measures. The article catalogs China's internal weaknesses (economic fragility, demographic decline, export dependence) and external dependencies (energy chokepoints through the Malacca Strait, commodity reliance, dollar-based financial system dependence) that the U.S. could systematically exploit. Rather than focusing solely on defensive supply chain resilience, the U.S. must adopt an offensive competitive strategy: tightening semiconductor technology controls with allied partners, coordinating trade restrictions on Chinese export sectors, preparing financial and energy sanctions for crisis scenarios, and exposing China's covert influence operations. This sequenced, calibrated pressure across economics, technology, and information domains would create real deterrent value and constrain Beijing's ability to coerce the U.S. and its partners.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  79. 79.
    2026-06-12 | diplomacy | 2026-W24 | Topics: AI, China, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    Iran has developed an effective information campaign using culturally savvy memes, AI-generated videos, and sarcastic social media posts that exploit weaknesses in traditional U.S. counter-messaging approaches. Official Iranian accounts generated massive engagement (900 million views in 50 days), particularly through Lego-style AI videos depicting Iranian military victories and U.S. humiliation, demonstrating that entertainment-focused content is harder to counter than traditional deceptive propaganda since one cannot fact-check a joke. To respond, the U.S. should build real-time threat intelligence from AI labs, disrupt covert networks while accepting open messaging, leverage information about Iranian repression, and renew public service media to rebuild soft power—while avoiding the reputational costs of covert influence operations.

    Read at CFR

  80. 80.
    2026-06-12 | defense | 2026-W24 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    The Iran War has exposed critical vulnerabilities in U.S. military capabilities, particularly the rapid depletion of precision munitions and inadequate defenses against low-cost Iranian Shahed drones (costing $35,000 versus $3-12 million U.S. defensive systems). Although U.S.-Israeli strikes degraded Iran's military infrastructure, tactical success failed to achieve strategic objectives—the regime survived, uranium stockpiles remained secure, and the Strait of Hormuz was closed, triggering a global energy crisis. The conflict reveals the unsustainability of the current U.S. defense model relying on expensive manned platforms and high-cost interceptor systems, requiring a shift toward mass-produced affordable drones and low-cost defenses. The U.S. should prioritize partnerships with Ukraine's proven low-cost drone production capacity and invest substantially in drone manufacturing, while political leaders must develop coherent pre-war strategies that translate tactical military victories into desired political outcomes.

    Read at CFR

  81. 81.
    2026-06-12 | tech | 2026-W24 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States

    The article argues that artificial intelligence's concentration in the Global North—where 75% of new data center capacity is being built and advanced economies score double the AI readiness of low-income countries—threatens to widen global inequality unless addressed through deliberate policy intervention. The Global South generates vast data streams yet lacks local infrastructure to process them, resulting in 'digital extractivism' where value accrues abroad. Solutions include South-South cooperation, leveraging renewable energy advantages, building sovereign digital public infrastructure models (like India's subsidized GPU access for startups), and redefining global AI governance to center rather than marginalize the Global South. Without strategic action, this divide will harden into structural inequality; with proper intervention, Global South countries can leapfrog legacy systems and shape AI's future.

    Read at Brookings

  82. 82.

    The United States is losing soft power, trust with allies, and control over the global security agenda, directly constraining military operations and strategic deterrence. Allies are denying U.S. access to bases, airspace, and intelligence sharing, while new security partnerships form without American involvement. Depleted munitions from recent conflicts and competing budget demands force difficult trade-offs between emerging technologies and traditional military capabilities. U.S. defense policy must pursue asymmetric competition, disciplined innovation, and diplomatic engagement to restore allied relationships and avoid overstretch.

    Read at CFR

  83. 83.
    2026-06-12 | defense | 2026-W24 | Topics: AI, Middle East, United States

    This CFR panel examines how artificial intelligence and autonomous drone systems are fundamentally reshaping modern military conflict, with particular focus on the Iran context. Expert speakers—including former DoD AI leaders and warfare technology specialists—discuss how these technologies are transforming battlefield dynamics and strategic doctrine. The panelists address the critical policy implication: the limits of existing international law and norms in governing AI-enabled autonomous warfare, raising questions about future conflict regulation and deterrence strategies.

    Read at CFR

  84. 84.
    2026-06-12 | middle_east | 2026-W24 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The article argues that the 2026 US-Iran war has permanently reshaped Persian Gulf geopolitics by breaking the psychological barrier against closing the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran will now integrate as a core deterrence tool replacing the weakened Axis of Resistance. Iran's forward-defense strategy through proxy groups like Hezbollah and Hamas failed to deter US and Israeli strikes on Iranian soil, prompting Tehran to shift its strategic focus to Hormuz closure and Gulf-state targeting as primary leverage. The Houthi capacity to simultaneously disrupt the Bab al-Mandab compounds this threat to global shipping. Iran will prioritize rebuilding missile and drone capabilities over nuclear infrastructure to keep the Strait closure option credible. For policymakers, this means the Gulf's pre-February 2026 security architecture is obsolete: GCC states face a persistent coercion threat, energy supply-chain diversification is now urgent, and any future diplomatic framework must account for Iran's demonstrated willingness to weaponize maritime chokepoints.

    Read at Chatham House

  85. 85.
    2026-06-12 | defense | 2026-W24 | Topics: AI, China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The U.S. defense industrial base faces critical vulnerabilities requiring integration of emerging technologies (AI, quantum computing, autonomous systems) while maintaining conventional munitions production—a challenge complicated by China's control of critical minerals and rare-earth supply chains and eroded domestic manufacturing capacity. While bipartisan policy initiatives like the National Defense Industrial Strategy show progress, Washington must prioritize rapid technology integration, increase domestic production capacity through advanced manufacturing investments, secure multiyear funding certainty, and aggressively reduce dependence on Chinese supply chains. The article emphasizes that a resilient defense industrial base is essential for deterrence and rapid wartime mobilization, requiring direct government investment, workforce development, and stronger defense industrial cooperation with allies.

    Read at CFR

  86. 86.
    2026-06-12 | economy | 2026-W24 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    Trump's approval ratings have collapsed among rural voters who previously supported him overwhelmingly, with his net approval among all rural voters falling from +20 to -14 since early 2025, and from +27 to -6 among white rural voters. This decline is driven by economic hardship: 77% of white rural voters rate the economy as fair or poor, farm bankruptcies surged 46% in 2025 due to tariffs and immigration restrictions, and manufacturing employment has fallen 77,000 jobs since Trump took office. The shift threatens Republican turnout in the 2026 midterms, particularly in swing rural areas like Iowa where GOP House seats are now considered toss-ups, as reduced rural enthusiasm could allow Democrats to gain ground despite limited defection to the Democratic Party.

    Read at Brookings

  87. 87.
    2026-06-12 | diplomacy | 2026-W24 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The 2026 World Cup, despite occurring amid multiple active global conflicts, presents minimal opportunity for sports diplomacy, with only four adversarial nation pairs (0.35% of potential matchups) among 48 competitors. Historical evidence shows that major sporting events facilitate peace breakthroughs only when coupled with substantive diplomatic efforts and political will from leadership, as demonstrated by US-China ping-pong diplomacy, which required parallel secret negotiations. While the World Cup can create temporary goodwill and symbolic gestures—such as the 1998 US-Iran match featuring exchanged white roses—these moments alone cannot resolve deep-rooted geopolitical tensions. Policymakers should view international sporting events as complements to, rather than substitutes for, existing diplomatic channels. The tournament format, based on sporting qualification rather than geopolitical distribution, naturally limits direct confrontations between adversaries.

    Read at CSIS

  88. 88.
    2026-06-12 | energy | 2026-W24 | Topics: China, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The Strait of Hormuz—through which 20% of global oil flows—has been effectively closed by Iranian attacks and tolls since February 2026, causing the largest supply disruption in oil market history (14+ mbd lost, gasoline at $4.31/gallon as of June). While strategic reserves and alternative pipelines temporarily cushion the shock, market normalization will take months even if the strait reopens due to infrastructure damage and depleted inventories. The closure threatens freedom of navigation globally, as Iran's toll system ($1/barrel) risks inspiring similar charges at other critical chokepoints (Malacca, Gibraltar), and short-term policy measures (gas tax holidays, export bans) would be counterproductive rather than effective.

    Read at Brookings

  89. 89.
    2026-06-12 | society | 2026-W24 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East

    Youth-led protest movements that toppled governments in Sri Lanka (2022), Bangladesh (2024), and Nepal (2025) have produced new administrations with strong mandates but mounting governance challenges. All three countries face economic strain from IMF bailouts compounded by the Iran war's inflationary pressures and fuel shortages, while inexperienced leaders are struggling to deliver on anti-corruption and reform promises. Relations with India present both opportunities—particularly in energy and humanitarian aid—and risks from border tensions and identity politics under the BJP's expanding regional footprint. The convergence of internal fragility and external shocks means these post-revolutionary governments could squander their democratic renewal windows if structural reforms stall.

    Read at Chatham House

  90. 90.
    2026-06-12 | middle_east | 2026-W24 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    Iran has introduced politically conditioned access to the Strait of Hormuz by selectively granting passage to vessels from allied nations (Russia, China, Pakistan) while charging tolls and requiring detailed information about ownership and crew nationality, directly challenging the 400-year-old principle of freedom of navigation. This represents a significant precedent for using maritime chokepoints as geopolitical leverage that could spread to other critical waterways like the Strait of Malacca and Taiwan Strait. Such politicization would harm smaller, trade-dependent countries most severely and shift global commerce from economically-determined to geopolitically-determined criteria, requiring major powers to sustain open transit through credible deterrence, transparency mechanisms, and resistance to competing systems of privileged access. The implications extend beyond immediate energy disruptions to fundamentally reshape how states use control of critical infrastructure for coercive purposes in an era of intensifying geopolitical rivalry.

    Read at Brookings

  91. 91.
    2026-06-12 | middle_east | 2026-W24 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade

    Iraq's new Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi faces the enduring challenge of integrating the Popular Mobilization Forces into state control, made more urgent as Iran-aligned militias draw Iraq into the US-Israeli conflict with Tehran. While some faction leaders—including Muqtada al-Sadr and Qais al-Khazali—have signaled willingness to integrate, groups more deeply tied to Iran's 'axis of resistance' such as Kataeb Hezbollah refuse, exposing the limits of any consolidation effort. Past integration attempts, like the Badr Corps after 2003, show that formal incorporation into state institutions does not sever informal loyalties or transfer real coercive power, particularly control over drones and rockets, to Baghdad. The war may offer a political opening as some PMF leaders prioritize the economic gains of stability over resistance, but entrenched patronage networks and US pressure for faster action complicate the path forward.

    Read at Chatham House

  92. 92.
    2026-06-12 | defense | 2026-W24 | Topics: Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that current definitions of lethal autonomous weapon systems are outdated because they focus on physical platforms (drones, munitions) rather than the AI-orchestration software that actually makes targeting decisions. Evidence shows that Ukraine's Delta and Russia's Svod systems demonstrate how battlefield management software fusing sensor data and coordinating hundreds of platforms represents the true locus of autonomous decision-making—a capability the U.S. military currently lacks in an integrated form. The author recommends updating DoD Directive 3000.09 to redefine autonomous weapons to include orchestration software, establishing a vendor-agnostic integrated layer under DAWG, and immediately conducting autonomy experiments to match Russia's operational learning rate. The strategic implication is that the nation building the most effective autonomous orchestration layer first will gain a decisive advantage comparable to early nuclear weapon development.

    Read at CSIS

  93. 93.
    2026-06-12 | china_indopacific | 2026-W24 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, Taiwan, United States

    The Iran war has unexpectedly strengthened China's global strategic position by forcing the US to deplete resources and political capital while China preserves strength and focuses on technological competition. By remaining outside the conflict, China is filling the role of economic benefactor to developing nations, dominating renewable energy technologies, and leveraging Iran's control of the Strait of Hormuz to enhance its economic centrality. The conflict reinforces China's narrative of inevitable rise and US decline, particularly pressuring Taiwan through messaging that the weakened US cannot be relied upon for defense. America must restore strategic discipline, reinvest in alliances, and concentrate on technological advancement to contest China's vision of global leadership and prevent these Chinese gains from becoming permanent.

    Read at Brookings

  94. 94.
    2026-06-12 | energy | 2026-W24 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The Heritage Foundation argues that Congress must urgently reform federal permitting systems to accelerate domestic energy production, citing that electricity demand will grow 25% by 2030 while current regulations like NEPA, the Endangered Species Act, and the Clean Water Act have become tools for activist litigation rather than environmental protection. The article contends that permitting delays—exemplified by the Mountain Valley Pipeline's 9-year approval timeline—artificially constrain energy supply, driving up household utility costs and inflation across the entire economy. Proposed reforms include establishing firm timelines on environmental reviews, closing litigation loopholes, and streamlining approvals for low-impact projects. The author frames energy security as critical to U.S. national security, economic stability, and geopolitical competitiveness against China and dependency on hostile nations like Russia and Iran.

    Read at Heritage

  95. 95.
    2026-06-11 | economy | 2026-W24 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    After over a year of historically high tariffs, the US goods trade deficit remains largely unchanged, contradicting the Trump administration's tariff strategy. When adjusted for inflation, April 2026 data shows the deficit at roughly pre-tariff levels (2022–24), despite anomalies like petroleum exports from the Iran war and substantial non-monetary gold exports that temporarily reduce nominal figures. Most economists argue that trade deficits are driven by macroeconomic forces beyond tariffs' reach, and recent data appear to vindicate this view. The analysis suggests tariffs are an ineffective tool for addressing trade imbalances, undermining a core rationale of the administration's trade policy.

    Read at CATO

  96. 96.
    2026-06-11 | china_indopacific | 2026-W24 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Taiwan, United States

    Taiwan conducted major live-fire drills on its western coast featuring its newly acquired U.S.-made HIMARS launchers, firing 32 rockets to validate precision strike capabilities and rapid redeployment (relocating within three minutes of launch). The exercises are part of Taipei's broader defensive strategy shift toward long-range missiles, attack drones, and precision munitions designed to counter a potential Chinese amphibious invasion, with plans to eventually field 111 HIMARS launchers. The drills underscore Taiwan's deepening integration of American weapon systems into its anti-invasion posture, with HIMARS providing the capability to strike amphibious forces, beachheads, and potentially mainland staging areas — raising the military cost of any cross-strait operation while also risking escalatory signaling to Beijing.

    Read at USNI

  97. 97.
    2026-06-11 | middle_east | 2026-W24 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States

    U.S. forces disabled three merchant tankers in the Gulf of Oman for allegedly violating the naval blockade of Iran, killing three Indian merchant mariners in the first fatalities from blockade enforcement. At least 50 commercial vessels and 14 seafarers have now been caught in the U.S.-Iran conflict, while the legality of the blockade without a Congressional declaration of war remains in question. Dark transits through the Strait of Hormuz are increasing—roughly half of recent passages occurred with AIS off—making enforcement and verification of U.S. escort claims difficult. The prolonged closure is driving structural shifts in energy trade patterns, with Chinese markets growing pessimistic and industry coining 'NACHO' (Not A Chance Hormuz Opens) to describe the outlook.

    Read at USNI

  98. 98.
    2026-06-11 | defense | 2026-W24 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The U.S. Navy established two new commands at HMAS Stirling in Western Australia—Submarine Squadron 3 and Naval Support Activity Stirling—to support Submarine Rotational Force-West (SRF-West), a trilateral AUKUS initiative enabling U.S. and U.K. nuclear submarines to operate from Perth beginning in 2027. This infrastructure will maintain up to five rotational submarines while building Australia's indigenous maintenance workforce and supporting its development of a sovereign nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet under AUKUS Pillar 1. The arrangement enhances U.S. submarine readiness and regional presence in the Indo-Pacific while reducing burden on U.S. shipyards, as demonstrated by recent successful maintenance of HMS Anson using local Australian suppliers and advanced manufacturing techniques. This model establishes sustainable trilateral submarine operations aligned with non-proliferation standards and accelerates Australia's capability to own, operate, and maintain its own SSNs.

    Read at USNI

  99. 99.
    2026-06-10 | defense | 2026-W24 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    NATO launched BALTOPS 2026, a maritime exercise involving 20 ships and 6,000 personnel from 15 NATO nations, smaller than 2025 due to Middle Eastern commitments. For the first time since 1972, the exercise is commanded from JFC Brunssum, enhancing realistic NATO command structure simulation and interoperability. The exercise focuses on deterring Russian threats in the Baltic through training in amphibious operations, air defense, anti-submarine warfare, mine countermeasures, and advanced unmanned systems. NATO officials emphasize that operational readiness demonstrations serve to prevent crises while building real-world interoperability among allies. The exercise underscores NATO's commitment to strengthening European conventional deterrence with greater ally responsibility for regional defense.

    Read at USNI

  100. 100.

    Space systems increasingly serve both civilian and military functions, creating ambiguity that could lead to dangerous misinterpretations and escalation. RAND's three-year study found that stakeholders broadly recognize most space systems as dual-use, but no universal definition exists and nations lack explicit governance frameworks—most relying on implicit or ambiguous policies. The report recommends stakeholders adopt behavior-based governance frameworks focused on observable actions rather than intent, include diverse stakeholders in framework development, and address the lag between technological innovation and policy response. Such mechanisms could reduce misperception risks while enabling continued technological advancement in space capabilities.

    Read at RAND

  101. 101.
    2026-06-08 | society | 2026-W24 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    CATO argues that the FCC's public-interest doctrine, which treats broadcasters as public trustees with diminished First Amendment rights, rests on an outdated spectrum-scarcity rationale that has been rendered obsolete by cable, streaming, and the internet. The article traces how successive administrations—from Kennedy and Nixon to Trump—have weaponized FCC licensing power to coerce and punish broadcasters over their editorial choices, citing recent actions against CBS, ABC/Disney, and others. CATO calls for courts to extend full First Amendment protections to broadcasters, for Congress to repeal tools like the equal-time and news-distortion rules, and ultimately for a property-rights approach to spectrum governance that would eliminate the FCC's leverage over editorial content.

    Read at CATO

  102. 102.

    The RAND–Oxford report argues that the U.S. and UK must establish coordinated bilateral frameworks to secure frontier AI systems against sophisticated nation-state threats. Current AI lab defenses are insufficient against advanced state actors, though both countries possess deep expertise in protecting critical technologies. The report proposes a cluster-based framework organizing AI security into five interconnected domains—access controls, supply chain, monitoring/response, personnel security, and physical security—enabling risk-informed, modular implementation without requiring wholesale industry restructuring. Key recommendations include establishing joint threat intelligence infrastructure, accelerating hardware security R&D, extending government personnel vetting to labs, coordinating supply-chain security, expanding red-teaming, conducting joint crisis exercises, and establishing common security standards.

    Read at RAND

  103. 103.
    2026-06-08 | tech | 2026-W23 | Topics: AI, Climate, Middle East, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The National Science Foundation’s Regional Innovation Engines are receiving expanded funding – $45 million over three years – to bolster existing clusters and expand their reach across the U.S., driven by concerns about declining U.S. leadership in key technologies and recent disruptions highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical events. The program, part of the CHIPS and Science Act, aims to foster place-based innovation by accelerating technology commercialization and creating self-sustaining regional economies. Evidence suggests a growing consensus that geographic concentration of innovation poses risks to knowledge spillovers and national competitiveness, necessitating a broader distribution of innovation hubs. This expansion aligns with broader White House initiatives to scale regional innovation ecosystems and bolster domestic technology innovation.

    Read at Brookings

  104. 104.
    2026-06-08 | economy | 2026-W23 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Algeria is positioning itself as a major regional power by undergoing significant economic modernization and diversifying away from its historical reliance on hydrocarbons. Its strategic value is underscored by its role as a critical gas supplier to the EU and its growing shift toward deeper trade and investment ties with the United States. To capitalize on this potential, international partners must support structural reforms, particularly in non-oil sectors like green hydrogen, tourism, and IT, while addressing persistent challenges such as high youth unemployment and bureaucratic hurdles. This engagement is crucial for transforming Algeria into a stable, diversified economic engine at the crossroads of Africa and Europe.

    Read at CSIS

  105. 105.
    2026-06-08 | economy | 2026-W23 | Topics: Middle East

    The CFR report, based on expert analysis, argues that the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict is fundamentally reshaping the global economy, primarily through significant disruptions to oil and gas supply chains in the Middle East. Elevated tensions have led to increased volatility in commodity markets, accelerating the shift away from the petrodollar and creating opportunities for alternative energy sources. Furthermore, the conflict is exacerbating existing inflationary pressures and prompting a reassessment of global trade routes and investment strategies. Policymakers should prioritize diversifying energy sources, bolstering strategic reserves, and closely monitoring the evolving geopolitical landscape for its economic ramifications.

    Read at CFR

  106. 106.
    2026-06-08 | economy | 2026-W23 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    Brookings research reveals a significant affordability gap disproportionately impacting Black and Latino voters heading into the 2026 midterms. The analysis highlights stagnant wages, rising costs of living across various sectors (healthcare, housing, utilities), and the administration’s disconnect from the economic realities faced by many Americans, particularly lower-income communities. Driven by factors like DOGE layoffs, a hostile political climate impacting DEI initiatives, and the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, these challenges have fueled concerns about inflation and economic hardship. Ultimately, the report argues that a credible policy response addressing wage stagnation, inflation, and expanded assistance programs is crucial to securing voter support, particularly among minority communities.

    Read at Brookings

  107. 107.

    The analysis argues that implementing a ban on U.S. gasoline exports, while politically appealing, would be counterproductive and detrimental to U.S. energy security. Export controls would create a domestic supply overhang, forcing Gulf Coast refiners to slash unprofitable operations and shift production toward more profitable fuels, ultimately causing gasoline prices to rebound. Furthermore, restricting exports would strain critical international alliances that depend on U.S. supplies as a strategic energy buffer. Because current federal law lacks the authority to mandate refiner throughput rates against economic incentives, any government intervention would fail to overcome these market dynamics.

    Read at CSIS

  108. 108.
    2026-06-08 | diplomacy | 2026-W23 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The analysis concludes that Xi Jinping's visit to North Korea is primarily symbolic, designed for Beijing to project regional leadership within the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) grouping and signal declining U.S. influence. Key evidence suggests that North Korea's deepening economic and military ties with Russia, coupled with the restoration of China-DPRK trade, provide Kim Jong-un with sufficient leverage to resist U.S. pressure. Consequently, the immediate prospects for denuclearization talks remain low, as Kim's strategic focus is on solidifying his nuclear status and achieving international normalization through non-Western partners.

    Read at CSIS

  109. 109.
    2026-06-08 | middle_east | 2026-W23 | Topics: Middle East

    As the Iran war reshapes the Middle East, Turkey is poised to expand its regional influence, driven by concerns over Iran’s attempts to redefine regional security dynamics, particularly regarding the Strait of Hormuz. Evidence suggests Turkey fears a prolonged conflict and regional instability, leading to increased security partnerships and defense industry cooperation with Gulf states – a move partially motivated by a desire to diversify away from US security guarantees. Furthermore, the conflict is fueling opportunities for Turkey to expand its role in regional connectivity projects, such as trade corridor redesigns and transport networks, exemplified by initiatives like the Iraq Development Road and the Middle Corridor. This expansion is also underscored by the formation of new regional alignments, like the Turkey-Pakistan-Saudi Arabia-Egypt quartet, aimed at shaping post-war geopolitics.

    Read at Chatham House

  110. 110.
    2026-06-08 | middle_east | 2026-W23 | Topics: Middle East

    Chatham House’s analysis suggests the Middle East is fracturing into distinct rival blocs, primarily driven by the escalating Iran-Israel conflict and its subsequent ripple effects. Evidence points to a hardening of alliances – particularly between Iran and countries like Syria and Lebanon – alongside a growing divergence in priorities and security interests among regional states. This fragmentation threatens the existing regional order and necessitates a reassessment of Western engagement, potentially requiring a more targeted diplomatic strategy focused on managing bloc dynamics rather than pursuing broad regional stability. Policymakers should anticipate increased competition and instability across the region.

    Read at Chatham House

  111. 111.
    2026-06-05 | middle_east | 2026-W23 | Topics: AI, China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    The UAE is pursuing an increasingly independent strategy in the region, demonstrated by its unilateral strike on Iranian-controlled facilities and subsequent withdrawal from OPEC, signaling a desire to be recognized as a leading global power. This approach is driven by a belief that closer ties with Israel, a divergence from regional norms, and alignment with the United States will bolster security and influence. Evidence of this strategy includes its support for the Rapid Support Forces in Sudan and its expanding economic footprint in Africa through companies like DP World, despite criticism and intervention from neighboring countries like Saudi Arabia. Ultimately, the UAE’s gamble on autonomy risks isolating itself from traditional Gulf partners while relying heavily on key alliances.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  112. 112.
    2026-06-05 | middle_east | 2026-W23 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, United States

    This Foreign Affairs article argues that the United States’ ability to wage war across vast distances hinges on permissive wartime access granted by host nations, a factor often overlooked in strategic discussions. The U.S. military has historically relied on countries like Uzbekistan, Kuwait, and Jordan to provide bases, transit routes, and logistical support, enabling operations in regions like Iraq, Syria, and Yemen. This access significantly reduces the costs and challenges associated with projecting military power, allowing for rapid deployment and sustained combat operations. However, the article warns that this reliance on permissive access increases the risk of the U.S. defaulting to military action, potentially leading to unwise interventions. Ultimately, restricting wartime access could limit U.S. global reach but also serve as a deterrent against unnecessary conflict.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  113. 113.
    2026-06-05 | middle_east | 2026-W23 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    U.S. forces’ continued interdiction of ships connected to Iran in the Indian Ocean, specifically the boarding of the MT Davina, is a key component of a broader blockade aimed at reducing Iranian oil exports. Evidence indicates a dramatic decrease – over 90% – in Iranian oil exports for May 2026, falling to 2.01 million barrels, alongside a significant drop in export value to $219 million. This disruption is causing concern among Iran and China, who are facing storage issues and potential funding constraints due to reduced oil revenue. Increased dark transits through the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with a slowdown in overall traffic, reflect the impact of the blockade. The situation highlights heightened tensions and a deteriorating regional operating environment, as evidenced by recent attacks on vessels like the MSC Sariska V.

    Read at USNI

  114. 114.

    A recent Foreign Affairs podcast highlights that U.S. allies are belatedly recognizing the fundamental shift in the U.S.-alliance dynamic under President Trump’s second term. The core argument is that allies initially failed to develop alternative strategies, evidenced by events like threats to abandon NATO, limited support for Japan against China, and a lack of consultation regarding the Iran conflict. Since then, however, European allies, particularly after Mark Carney’s Davos speech and the Greenland incident, have begun to acknowledge the diminished reliance on U.S. support and are starting to formulate more independent approaches. This shift reflects a growing understanding that the traditional U.S.-led order is no longer guaranteed, necessitating a re-evaluation of strategic partnerships.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  115. 115.
    2026-06-04 | defense | 2026-W23 | Topics: China, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    The Foreign Affairs article argues that the U.S. military is entering an era of protracted, marathon-like conflicts, rather than quick, decisive victories. Recent events, particularly the ongoing war with Iran, demonstrate that modern warfare is characterized by extended engagements, resource depletion, and a shift in power dynamics favoring adversaries with access to cheaper, mass-produced weaponry like drones. The U.S. military’s reliance on fixed assets and failure to adequately invest in defenses has resulted in significant losses. To adapt, the U.S. must prioritize building stockpiles of munitions, leveraging advanced technologies, hardening bases, and fostering closer alliances – a shift from rapid, targeted operations to sustained, resilient engagement.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  116. 116.

    The Foreign Affairs article, "The Transatlantic Crucible," argues that Donald Trump’s policies have severely damaged the transatlantic alliance, characterized by corrosive rhetoric, erratic behavior, and a disregard for established norms. Evidence cited includes threats to NATO, withdrawal of aid, and politicization of intelligence, leading to a "rupture" in the rules-based international order. However, this crisis is forcing European nations to invest in independent military and intelligence capabilities, potentially strengthening the alliance in the long run. Policy implications necessitate a renewed commitment to Article 5, consultation with allies, and a shift away from perceived territorial ambitions to rebuild trust and address shared threats like China and Russia.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  117. 117.
    2026-06-03 | middle_east | 2026-W23 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    This Foreign Affairs article, dated June 2026, argues that the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran has inadvertently strengthened the Islamic Republic, leading to a fundamental shift in its strategy. Initially intended to cripple Iran, the conflict instead fostered innovation and adaptation within the country, resulting in a more confident and strategically astute leadership. Key to this transformation is a new generation of Iranian officials – primarily from the IRGC – who, hardened by decades of war and lacking the insecurity of the revolution’s founders, prioritize pragmatic statecraft and national defense over ideological grandstanding. This shift represents a move away from revolutionary rhetoric and towards a more calculated approach to regional influence and geopolitical strategy.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  118. 118.
    2026-06-02 | middle_east | 2026-W23 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, United States

    This Foreign Affairs article argues that Israel’s approach to the conflict with Hezbollah is a self-defeating ‘trap,’ driven by a combination of domestic political pressures and a shift towards a perpetually aggressive security doctrine. Evidence shows Israel’s rapid shifts in strategy – from diplomacy to military escalation – have failed to achieve lasting results, exemplified by the ongoing fighting, displacement of civilians, and expansion of the buffer zone. Despite attempts at high-level negotiations, Israel’s focus on territorial gains and perceived threats has undermined genuine efforts at disarming Hezbollah and restoring Lebanese sovereignty. Ultimately, the article suggests that a more patient, statecraft-based approach, focused on enabling the Lebanese state to achieve these goals, is crucial to breaking this cycle of escalation and achieving a sustainable resolution.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  119. 119.
    2026-06-02 | middle_east | 2026-W23 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    Foreign Affairs’ article, dated June 2, 2026, posits that Iran has adopted a strategy of embracing a ‘forever war’ against the United States, prioritizing conflict over diplomacy. This shift is driven by a belief that sustained engagement, particularly through actions like closing the Strait of Hormuz and exploiting divisions among U.S. allies, enhances Iran’s international influence and positions it as a key player in a multipolar world. Evidence suggests this strategy is fueled by a hardline regime solidified by the recent devastation of Iranian infrastructure and the resulting shift in internal power dynamics. Consequently, the United States and its allies are increasingly forced to accommodate Iran’s demands, recognizing its leverage and seeking a resolution to the ongoing crisis.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  120. 120.
    2026-06-01 | africa | 2026-W23 | Topics: AI, China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The article argues against the narrative of the ‘end of foreign aid,’ contending that reduced funding will hinder development progress. Evidence presented highlights the catastrophic impact of aid cuts on global health, with projections indicating a 200,000 increase in child deaths in 2025 due to reduced health assistance. Despite significant progress in poverty reduction and improved health outcomes over the past two decades – including halving extreme poverty and dramatically decreasing deaths from diseases like HIV/AIDS and malaria – global aid funding remains substantially lower. The authors advocate for a shift towards empowering developing nations through targeted investments in local capacity building, aiming to eventually make aid unnecessary. This approach should focus on sustainable growth and human potential within recipient countries.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  121. 121.
    2026-05-31 | middle_east | 2026-W22 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    The analysis argues that the United States is in a strategic quagmire regarding Iran, as continued military strikes and maximalist demands have undermined the US's negotiating position. The current standoff is economically unsustainable, evidenced by the depletion of global oil inventories due to the closed Strait of Hormuz. Therefore, the only viable path is for the US to accept significant concessions—on both the nuclear program and the Strait of Hormuz—to secure a deal and prevent global economic collapse. Failure to compromise risks escalating conflict and leaving the US worse off than before the war.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  122. 122.

    The article argues that the current focus on 'middle power' autonomy and a multipolar world is a delusion, as these states are not gaining power but are becoming more exposed. Historically, middle powers thrived under the shelter of great power competition and stable globalization; however, the increasing predatory nature of the US and China—using tech restrictions and supply chain controls—is making 'hedging' nearly impossible. Consequently, states must abandon the fantasy of free agency and instead pursue strategic alignment with a great-power system that offers the best protection, while simultaneously building robust national strength within that chosen coalition.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  123. 123.
    2026-05-31 | economy | 2026-W22 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The article argues that Cuba's severe economic collapse, driven by U.S. sanctions and oil blockades, makes continued political resistance unsustainable. Facing internal divisions and external pressure, Havana's only viable path is a negotiated settlement that avoids humanitarian catastrophe. The U.S. has leveraged secondary sanctions and legal threats, demanding Cuba sever security ties with Russia and China while liberalizing its economy. For stability, the U.S. must structure a sequenced deal: Cuba makes substantial concessions (e.g., opening to private investment and political reforms) in exchange for the lifting of sanctions and allowing foreign capital, thus averting both regime collapse and potential U.S. military intervention.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  124. 124.
    2026-05-30 | middle_east | 2026-W22 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear

    The Chatham House analysis posits that Iran is navigating a period of acute domestic instability and economic strain following a recent conflict. The regime must simultaneously manage wartime governance, internal elite dynamics, and public sentiment at home. This internal pressure forces Tehran to fundamentally recalibrate its regional strategy and international engagement with both allies and adversaries. Ultimately, the confluence of domestic and external pressures is reshaping Iran's deterrence calculus and diplomatic positioning in an increasingly volatile geopolitical environment.

    Read at Chatham House

  125. 125.
    2026-05-30 | africa | 2026-W22 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East

    The Chatham House analysis argues that Ethiopia's deep-seated internal and regional conflicts—particularly in Tigray and Amhara—are overshadowing the upcoming election, rendering the poll insufficient for achieving stability. Escalating tensions are driven by the TPLF's reconstitution of regional authority and the risk of wider regional conflagration, evidenced by proxy conflicts and shifting alliances with neighbors like Eritrea and Sudan. Consequently, the report stresses that resolving the crisis requires an urgent, coordinated diplomatic response from major international actors (including the US, EU, and China) to bolster regional mediation efforts, rather than relying on political processes or electoral outcomes.

    Read at Chatham House

  126. 126.
    2026-05-30 | europe | 2026-W22 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    Europe is undergoing a significant military rearmament effort, with NATO allies committing to higher defense spending and Germany dramatically increasing its budget, suggesting a strong capacity to deter Russian aggression. However, this military surge is offset by profound economic and geopolitical challenges, including low productivity, energy crises, and a widening technological gap with the US and China. Consequently, the analysis concludes that Europe will become increasingly inward-looking, capable of defending itself regionally but losing global geoeconomic influence. This trajectory presents a mixed blessing for the US, as a self-sufficient but non-projecting Europe risks becoming a less reliable and more vulnerable ally.

    Read at CFR

  127. 127.
    2026-05-30 | americas | 2026-W22 | Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States

    Antisemitic terrorism in the United States is surging, driven by a complex convergence of extremist groups, including state sponsors (like Iran), neo-Nazis, far-left activists, and jihadists. This threat is notable for its ideological diversity, as multiple, disparate groups are converging on shared targets and grievances. This multiplicity severely complicates intelligence collection and resource allocation, as law enforcement cannot focus on a single network or profile. Consequently, policy must adopt permanent, comprehensive security measures that address the broader fragmentation of the extremist landscape, rather than treating the threat as isolated to any single community.

    Read at CSIS

  128. 128.

    The consensus among global policy experts is that the post-WWII rules-based international order is experiencing structural fatigue, necessitating a reordering of global governance. Key evidence points to the limitations of traditional multilateral institutions in addressing modern, complex challenges like climate change and AI, leading states to prioritize outcomes over mere processes. Consequently, the strategic implication is a shift away from universal institutions toward 'coalitions of the willing' or open plurilateralism. Future international cooperation will therefore be built on flexible alliances that combine shared values with specific, tangible national interests, allowing middle powers greater autonomy in global decision-making.

    Read at CFR

  129. 129.
    2026-05-30 | middle_east | 2026-W22 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    Analysts argue that the U.S. has suffered a significant strategic defeat in the region, primarily due to Iran's control over the Strait of Hormuz. This control grants Iran immense leverage over a major portion of the world's energy supply, fundamentally reversing the regional power balance. The consensus is that military options to restore previous dominance are unfeasible without causing catastrophic damage to global energy infrastructure. Consequently, the U.S. must accept a permanently diminished regional influence, necessitating a strategic reassessment of its global commitments and accepting a new, less dominant status quo.

    Read at Brookings

  130. 130.
    2026-05-30 | energy | 2026-W22 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The Brookings analysis argues that while current crude oil price stability is maintained by temporary buffers—such as emergency global inventories and floating storage—these reserves are finite and will deplete by mid-July 2026. The primary risk stems from the structural supply shortfall caused by the Strait of Hormuz closure, which is currently being masked by these temporary buffers. Once these buffers are exhausted, the market faces a significant, unmitigated supply deficit, leading to a high probability of sharp, non-linear price spikes. Policymakers must monitor the depletion timeline, as sustained closure could push oil prices to levels consistent with a global recession.

    Read at Brookings

  131. 131.

    The article warns that recent high-tempo conflicts, particularly the campaign against Iran, have severely depleted U.S. munitions stockpiles, creating a significant window of vulnerability for potential Western Pacific contingencies. Key evidence shows that replenishing major systems—such as THAAD, Patriot, and Tomahawk—is a multiyear endeavor, with some munitions requiring three to several years to return to pre-war levels due to production lead times and high demand. Strategically, the U.S. must execute massive procurement efforts, as reflected in the FY 2027 budget, while navigating complex allocation decisions to balance critical domestic needs with ongoing commitments to allies and partners.

    Read at CSIS

  132. 132.
    2026-05-30 | economy | 2026-W22 | Topics: AI, Climate, Cybersecurity, Middle East, United States

    The article argues that Kevin Warsh's tenure will focus on restoring the Fed's independence and adherence to its core mandate of price stability. While Warsh aims to revert to a strict 2% inflation target and reduce the Fed's balance sheet, his efforts are constrained by persistent inflationary risks, particularly those stemming from geopolitical conflicts and supply shocks. Policymakers must recognize that any shifts in U.S. interest rates will have immediate and significant ripple effects across global financial markets, requiring careful monitoring of the Fed's policy trajectory.

    Read at CFR

  133. 133.
    2026-05-30 | defense | 2026-W22 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The 2026 assessment argues that the U.S. faces a complex and unpredictable terrorism landscape, moving away from a single paramount threat. Key evidence points to growing strength among formal al Qaeda and ISIS affiliates in the Middle East and Africa, while the domestic threat stems primarily from loose networks and lone actors motivated by niche ideologies. Policy implications suggest that counterterrorism strategies must adapt to this varied threat profile, especially as the U.S. simultaneously reduces overall investment in the field.

    Read at CSIS

  134. 134.
    2026-05-30 | middle_east | 2026-W22 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Transatlantic cooperation between the U.S. and Europe in the Middle East is currently severely strained due to deep policy divisions over Gaza and Iran, compounded by U.S. unilateral actions and political hostility. While shared interests exist, the current climate—marked by disagreements on international law, the use of force, and U.S. support for Israel—makes major cooperation unlikely in the short term. However, the analysis suggests that Europe can enhance its influence by overcoming internal divisions and leveraging its independent capacity for humanitarian aid, sanctions, and investment. Ultimately, for cooperation to resume, the U.S. must adopt a more aligned and cooperative policy approach.

    Read at Brookings

  135. 135.
    2026-05-30 | china_indopacific | 2026-W22 | Topics: AI, China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The article argues that treating arms sales to Taiwan as a negotiating chip with China is a strategic error that severely weakens regional deterrence. Providing advanced, asymmetric weaponry is critical for maintaining peace by raising the cost of potential Chinese aggression and upholding the bipartisan consensus. Pausing these sales undermines the Taiwan Relations Act, erodes U.S. credibility among allies, and fuels skepticism regarding American commitment to the island. Therefore, the U.S. must swiftly approve the pending arms package to maintain a credible deterrent and stabilize the Taiwan Strait.

    Read at CFR

  136. 136.
    2026-05-30 | china_indopacific | 2026-W22 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The Brookings report argues that the United States risks falling behind China because its traditional pillars of global preeminence—including military and economic power—are eroding. Key evidence highlights the depletion of U.S. military capacity from prolonged conflicts, the diminishing effectiveness of economic sanctions, and the distraction caused by domestic political cycles. To counter this strategic decline, the analysis concludes that the U.S. must shift its focus from external confrontation to internal reform. Sustaining competition with China requires a deep political consensus and comprehensive overhaul of military, economic statecraft, and industrial policy, asserting that America's strength abroad must be built at home.

    Read at Brookings

  137. 137.
    2026-05-30 | africa | 2026-W22 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, Russia, United States

    The article argues that Africa's sovereignty and state legitimacy are under threat due to resource competition, debt crises, and territorial disputes, creating a complex power vacuum. External powers (including China, Gulf states, and traditional actors) are capitalizing on this instability, increasing the risk of proxy conflicts and empowering non-state actors. For external players, the implication is that the US must abandon outdated assumptions and adopt a strategy that respects enduring African priorities. Ultimately, the continent's demographic growth and resource wealth grant African states significant leverage, making regional cooperation and stable investment climates key to future geopolitical influence.

    Read at CFR

  138. 138.

    The Brookings analysis concludes that the Trump-Xi summit was largely an exercise in optics, lacking concrete deliverables or substantive agreements. Key evidence points to significant discrepancies between the official readouts, with the U.S. emphasizing trade and rare earths while China focused on 'constructive strategic stability' and the need for caution regarding Taiwan. This divergence suggests that the relationship is moving toward separate, uncoordinated diplomatic statements rather than joint communiques. Policymakers should interpret this as a structural cooling of the bilateral relationship, where competition and differing national priorities are beginning to outweigh efforts at cooperation.

    Read at Brookings

  139. 139.

    U.S.-India relations have matured significantly from a history marked by Cold War suspicion and nuclear tensions into a comprehensive strategic partnership. This evolution is evidenced by key milestones, including the 2005 Defense Framework and the 2007 Civil Nuclear Deal, which integrated India into global energy and defense supply chains. The deepening cooperation across economic, military, and energy sectors signals a major shift in U.S. foreign policy focus. Strategically, this robust partnership makes India a critical pillar of U.S. Indo-Pacific policy, ensuring stability and countering regional geopolitical challenges.

    Read at CFR

  140. 140.
    2026-05-30 | economy | 2026-W22 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States

    Ambassador Greer argues that the U.S. is successfully initiating a shift toward rebuilding domestic manufacturing capacity, evidenced by falling goods trade deficits, rising manufacturing wages, and increased productivity. While tariffs are a key tool, he cautions that they are insufficient alone, noting that the goal is increasing manufacturing's share of the economy, not just job numbers. For a comprehensive strategy, policymakers must adopt a holistic 'pro-production' approach. This requires combining trade measures with domestic investments in tax reform, energy development, R&D, and streamlining federal regulatory and permitting processes to recreate resilient manufacturing ecosystems.

    Read at CFR

  141. 141.
    2026-05-30 | middle_east | 2026-W22 | Topics: AI, Middle East, United States

    The Middle East's regional center of gravity has shifted decisively from older powers (like Egypt and Iraq) to the Gulf states—specifically Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar. This shift is underpinned by the Gulf nations' economic diversification, which integrates them into global high-tech and logistics ecosystems, making them less reliant solely on hydrocarbons. The Abraham Accords and the weakening of regional rivals reinforce this trend, solidifying the Gulf's growing influence. Strategically, the outcome of the conflict with Iran is critical: a diminished Tehran accelerates the Gulf states' dominance, while a surviving Iran threatens US interests and could force Washington to significantly reduce its long-term military commitment to the region.

    Read at CFR

  142. 142.

    Global defense spending is entering a new boom phase, driven by geopolitical tensions and the perceived decline of U.S. security guarantees. This rearmament trend is forcing nations, such as Japan, to abandon long-held pacifist doctrines and significantly raise military budgets. However, this massive spending is largely financed through increased borrowing, leading to soaring national debt, inflation, and higher interest rates across rich democracies. Consequently, governments face severe political and economic strain, struggling to balance public demands for affordable goods with the escalating costs of national security, creating major policy spillovers.

    Read at CFR

  143. 143.
    2026-05-30 | middle_east | 2026-W22 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    Despite President Trump's insistence that his Iran policy is immune to domestic politics, the article argues that the conflict will be a significant political liability in the upcoming midterms. This vulnerability is fueled primarily by the war's negative economic fallout, including inflation and spiking gas prices, which is eroding support among his core base and severely damaging his approval ratings. Consequently, the political costs of the conflict are likely to overshadow any potential strategic benefits, making the Middle East crisis a major electoral vulnerability for the Republican party. Policymakers should anticipate that the domestic political fallout will dominate the narrative, regardless of any quick military resolution.

    Read at CFR

  144. 144.
    2026-05-30 | economy | 2026-W22 | Topics: China, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The CFR assessment finds that Trump's trade policy presents a mixed picture, with modest reductions in the goods trade deficit but a slow rebound in manufacturing's share of the economy. Key challenges include the persistent uncertainty surrounding tariff rates, which hinders the multi-year capital investments necessary for reshoring and reindustrialization. For the policy to achieve its goals, the administration must establish stable, predictable tariff structures and abandon traditional principles like Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) treatment. Ultimately, achieving investment certainty is critical for the U.S. to successfully boost domestic manufacturing and stabilize its trade relationship with key partners.

    Read at CFR

  145. 145.

    The 2026 World Cup presents a complex and diffuse security challenge, as the massive scale and international nature of the event create numerous 'soft targets' outside secured venues. Threats are multifaceted, stemming from sophisticated foreign state actors (e.g., Russia, Iran) seeking disruption, as well as unpredictable domestic lone actors motivated by diverse ideologies, including white supremacy and anti-government extremism. Consequently, security strategy must move beyond single-event protection to implement sustained, multi-layered countermeasures across all public and transit areas. Policy efforts must therefore balance the need to counter organized state-sponsored threats with the necessity of mitigating the risk posed by decentralized, radicalized individuals.

    Read at CSIS

  146. 146.
    2026-05-30 | economy | 2026-W22 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Trade, United States

    The global order is not collapsing, but fragmenting into exclusive, competing coalitions, prompting middle powers to hedge their bets and form smaller, self-protective blocs. This trend is fueled by the U.S.'s own policies, such as 'friendshoring' and the Inflation Reduction Act, which create selective, invitation-only economic clubs that exclude many potential partners. This exclusionary approach risks alienating the very middle powers the U.S. needs to maintain influence. To successfully lead a new international order, Washington must pivot from selective groupings to rebuilding inclusive, shared partnerships, prioritizing broad cooperation over transactional alliances.

    Read at CFR

  147. 147.

    The article argues that global rearmament is poised to become the biggest fiscal stimulus story since the pandemic, fundamentally reshaping global economies and politics. Driven by rising geopolitical tensions (e.g., China, Middle East) and the adoption of advanced technologies like AI, nations are making massive, double-digit increases in defense spending. Because these military buildups are primarily financed through increased borrowing, they are rapidly escalating global government debt and deficits. This fiscal strain is projected to push up interest rates and cause market volatility, creating a difficult dilemma for central banks caught between fighting inflation and financing national defense.

    Read at CFR

  148. 148.
    2026-05-28 | defense | 2026-W22 | Topics: Middle East, NATO, Trade

    The UK and France are preparing a multinational military mission to ensure freedom of navigation through the critical Strait of Hormuz. This effort is evidenced by the deployment of RFA Lyme Bay, which has been reactivated and refitted as a mothership for advanced, uncrewed minehunting systems (USVs and AUVs). This technological shift demonstrates a strategic pivot toward agile, high-tech maritime capabilities among NATO allies. The deployment signals a collective, defensive commitment to securing vital global shipping lanes and maintaining confidence in major international trade chokepoints.

    Read at USNI

  149. 149.
    2026-05-24 | china_indopacific | 2026-W21 | Topics: AI, China, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The Beijing summit did not resolve U.S.-China competition, but instead established a framework of 'mutually useful ambiguity' by having both powers claim 'strategic stability' while defining it differently. The U.S. framed the agreement around transactional, economic deliverables (e.g., trade boards, purchases), while China emphasized a political doctrine centered on respecting its 'core interests' and development path. This fundamental asymmetry means the relationship is defined by managed rivalry, not strategic settlement, leaving critical issues like Taiwan, AI, and overcapacity outside the formal agreements. Policymakers must recognize that the current arrangement is a bargaining mechanism, not a resolution, suggesting continued volatility despite the high-level dialogue.

    Read at CFR

  150. 150.
    2026-05-24 | china_indopacific | 2026-W21 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The Trump-Xi summit was disappointing for Southeast and South Asia, failing to provide stability on critical issues like the energy crisis or regional security. Regional states are deeply concerned about being excluded from major decisions by a combined US-China framework, particularly regarding the South China Sea and trade. Compounding this geopolitical uncertainty are unresolved issues concerning rare earth controls and AI platforms, which threaten to push the region into a severe economic recession. Consequently, regional powers must urgently accelerate the diversification of trade, energy, and supply chains to mitigate the risks posed by a prolonged, high-stakes US-China rivalry.

    Read at CFR

  151. 151.
    2026-05-24 | middle_east | 2026-W21 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that major conflicts follow predictable historical structures, using historical analogies to forecast the outcomes of the current crises. It compares the US-Iran confrontation to the Vietnam War, predicting an unstable compromise settlement that leaves the ultimate fate of the regime and its nuclear program unresolved. In contrast, it draws parallels between the war in Ukraine and the Korean War, suggesting a more stable, durable armistice that solidifies the current lines of conflict. These structural patterns imply that policymakers should prepare for an unresolved status quo in the Middle East and a protracted, frozen-border stalemate in Eastern Europe.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  152. 152.
    2026-05-24 | china_indopacific | 2026-W21 | Topics: AI, China, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The recent U.S.-China summit failed to yield concrete agreements, signaling a mutual acceptance of the current, complex status quo. While discussions covered geopolitical flashpoints like Taiwan and Iran, both sides largely avoided addressing traditional U.S. complaints regarding overcapacity or IP theft, suggesting a withdrawal of structural pressure. The resulting concept of "constructive strategic stability" implies that both nations are prioritizing managing inevitable competition and buying time, rather than attempting fundamental policy changes. This suggests the U.S. has limited leverage to force deep reforms, leading to a realistic, yet challenging, relationship of equals.

    Read at CSIS

  153. 153.

    The Trump-Xi summit largely failed to address the structural tensions defining U.S.-China tech competition, which remains the most consequential dynamic. Key evidence shows that critical issues—including advanced semiconductor controls, AI safety, and sophisticated cyber infiltration (e.g., Volt Typhoon)—were only lightly discussed, despite the high-level diplomatic fanfare. Consequently, the analysis suggests that U.S. policy must pivot away from relying on diplomatic de-escalation and instead focus on robust domestic measures, such as enforcing data sovereignty and maintaining technological decoupling, to safeguard national security.

    Read at CSIS

  154. 154.
    2026-05-24 | middle_east | 2026-W21 | Topics: China, Climate, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The article argues that water scarcity, rather than energy dependence, represents the most critical and enduring vulnerability in the Middle East. Key evidence highlights the region's extreme reliance on energy-intensive desalination plants, which are vulnerable to conflict and cyberattacks, compounded by severe groundwater depletion and climate change. Strategically, the crisis demands urgent regional cooperation to manage transboundary aquifers and fund sustainable, low-energy water technologies. External powers, including the US and China, must prioritize water security in post-conflict reconstruction efforts to mitigate the projected economic damage and prevent future instability.

    Read at Brookings

  155. 155.
    2026-05-24 | diplomacy | 2026-W21 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the post-WWII global peace, which rested on the twin convictions of non-aggression and anti-imperialism, is rapidly collapsing due to rising interstate conflicts and the breakdown of international norms. Key evidence includes the modernization of nuclear arsenals, the proliferation of regional wars, and the erosion of collective moral leadership. Policy recommendations stress that the solution is not merely institutional reform, but the restoration of the global commitment to these foundational principles, requiring political leadership to revitalize the UN's role as an impartial mediator and champion of international law.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  156. 156.
    2026-05-24 | middle_east | 2026-W21 | Topics: Middle East

    Egypt is actively mediating the Iran conflict not to gain regional influence, but as a calculated risk-management strategy to safeguard its national interests and stabilize its economy. Evidence of this includes forming a quadrilateral grouping with regional allies and engaging in backchannel diplomacy to push for de-escalation. Cairo's core objectives are securing freedom of navigation in the Red Sea, countering Israeli regional dominance, and ensuring continued foreign investment. While de-escalation is beneficial, the analysis suggests that Egypt's efforts alone will not resolve long-term geopolitical tensions, such as the dispute over Nile waters or regional power imbalances.

    Read at Chatham House

  157. 157.
    2026-05-24 | china_indopacific | 2026-W21 | Topics: AI, China, Cybersecurity, Middle East, United States

    The exponential advancement of AI is set to make AI policy the most critical issue in the 2028 U.S. election, driven by profound domestic disruptions. Key risks include widespread job displacement, dangerous misuse potential, and the government's ability to conduct unprecedented surveillance. To mitigate the resulting political backlash, policy must proactively address three interconnected pillars: establishing domestic safety regulations, implementing social policies to broadly distribute AI's economic gains, and maintaining global technological leadership. Failure to act now risks a reactive, inadequate policy response that could undermine both American competitiveness and national security, particularly against China.

    Read at CFR

  158. 158.
    2026-05-24 | economy | 2026-W21 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Trade, United States

    The article warns against complacency, arguing that current strong market performance and solid short-term economic data mask significant, structural damage to the U.S. economy. This damage is attributed to recent policy choices, including deficit-financed tax cuts, undermining central bank independence, and implementing disruptive trade tariffs. The author cautions that markets can be out of sync with reality for extended periods, suggesting that the accumulated instability could trigger a rapid and severe economic correction. Therefore, policymakers must prioritize restoring institutional stability, adhering to the rule of law, and addressing deep fiscal imbalances to maintain long-term economic resilience.

    Read at CFR

  159. 159.
    2026-05-24 | china_indopacific | 2026-W21 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the United States faces an era of unprecedented global complexity—marked by great power competition, unresolved regional conflicts, and rapid technological shifts (AI)—rendering the current strategic status quo unsustainable. Key evidence includes the heightened geopolitical tension between China and Russia, coupled with global health and economic instability. Despite deep domestic political polarization, the authors note a growing bipartisan consensus that fundamental changes are required for U.S. international leadership. Therefore, the implication is that the U.S. must undertake a comprehensive, 'blue-sky' rethinking of its strategy, moving beyond partisan divides to address systemic global challenges.

    Read at CFR

  160. 160.
    2026-05-24 | economy | 2026-W21 | Topics: China, Middle East, United States

    The article argues that the rapid advancement of AI risks creating extreme wealth concentration and displacing the middle class, threatening the fundamental American model of converting wages into assets. To counter this, the authors propose an "AI Homestead Policy," drawing parallels to historical acts that broadened public access to productive frontiers. This policy requires systemic interventions beyond market forces, including massive workforce retooling, establishing personal data rights, and mandating a "compute commons." Ultimately, the strategy calls for giving local communities an ownership stake in AI infrastructure to ensure that the gains of the new economy are broadly shared, rather than concentrated among a few large tech firms.

    Read at CSIS

  161. 161.
    2026-05-24 | diplomacy | 2026-W21 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The article argues that U.S. national security strategy requires an immediate, zero-based review to discard outdated principles and disruptive policies. This review must rigorously distinguish between fundamental "goals of necessity" (e.g., survival) and aspirational "goals of choice" (e.g., global primacy). Effective strategy demands stress-testing three elements: the plausible efficacy of the goals, the associated costs and risks, and the availability of necessary resources (political, economic, and military). Policymakers must therefore adopt a highly pragmatic, resource-conscious approach, moving beyond historical assumptions to secure U.S. interests.

    Read at CFR

  162. 162.
    2026-05-24 | diplomacy | 2026-W21 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The China-Russia partnership is a durable strategic alignment, driven by shared opposition to Western dominance and a mutual goal of promoting a multipolar world. While geographically and ideologically bound, the relationship is defined by pragmatic utility rather than a full alliance. China maintains strategic caution, actively diversifying energy sources and preserving economic ties with the West to avoid over-reliance on Moscow. Consequently, the partnership remains asymmetrical, providing Russia with crucial geopolitical support while serving as a reliable counterweight for Beijing's broader global ambitions.

    Read at Chatham House

  163. 163.
    2026-05-24 | europe | 2026-W21 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Trade, Ukraine

    The Chatham House analysis argues that Western sanctions against Russia are failing because the effort is hampered by poor coordination and a reluctance among nations to bear the necessary economic costs. The UK's recent sanctions efforts, particularly regarding diesel and jet fuel, were criticized as inconsistent and weak, undermining the broader Western front and damaging unity. For sanctions to be effective, the West must overcome its desire to limit its own economic pain and instead adopt a unified, serious approach that openly accepts the costs required to counter Russia's existential threat. Failure to coordinate and commit fully risks weakening the overall Western response and the cohesion of alliances.

    Read at Chatham House

  164. 164.
    2026-05-24 | africa | 2026-W21 | Topics: China, Middle East, Trade

    The persistence of the war in Sudan is attributed not to internal conflict alone, but to external actors who are supplying arms, funding, and logistical support, creating a self-sustaining conflict economy. Key regional players, including the UAE, Egypt, and others, are implicated in supplying weapons and facilitating cross-border movements, while international diplomatic efforts have failed due to a lack of enforcement mechanisms. To achieve peace, the international community must undertake a coordinated 'deproxification' effort, forcefully cutting all external lifelines—including arms routes and gold shipments. The analysis concludes that the US must leverage its full diplomatic and economic power, such as sanctions, to pressure enablers and force an end to external patronage.

    Read at Chatham House

  165. 165.

    The convergence of AI and advanced satellite imagery is ushering in an era of "planetary intelligence," suggesting that the massive computational demands of global data analysis may eventually necessitate space-based data centers. This transformation is underpinned by technological breakthroughs, such as the miniaturization of electronics, which allows for real-time, comprehensive monitoring of Earth's systems. Strategically, this capability enables intervention in human decision-making loops—allowing for immediate responses to climate change, illegal resource extraction, or geopolitical instability. Policymakers must recognize that this shift represents a profound economic and geopolitical inflection point, requiring proactive strategies to mitigate risks like space junk and potential extra-planetary conflict.

    Read at CFR

  166. 166.
    2026-05-24 | economy | 2026-W21 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    The Brookings report argues that federal policy volatility—including changes in immigration enforcement, tariffs, and capital access—poses a significant threat to the stability and growth of Latino-owned small businesses. These businesses, which represent a major economic force, are highly vulnerable to compounding shocks that create simultaneous labor and demand disruptions. The analysis warns that even modest declines in this sector could translate into the loss of thousands of businesses and over 100,000 jobs. To mitigate these risks, the report advocates for an affirmative policy vision that restores predictability, lowers structural barriers, and ensures stable access to capital and federal procurement to support long-term economic resilience.

    Read at Brookings

  167. 167.
    2026-05-24 | china_indopacific | 2026-W21 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Taiwan, Trade

    The Chatham House analysis frames the potential Trump-Xi summit as having ambiguous and complex objectives, ranging from securing trade deals for US businesses to achieving regional conflict de-escalation and asserting global pre-eminence. Key discussion points emphasize the entanglement of US commercial interests with geopolitical flashpoints, such as the potential role of China in resolving the Iran conflict and the implications for Taiwan. Ultimately, the success of the summit is presented as highly contingent, suggesting that the geopolitical outcome will depend less on formal agreements and more on the personal chemistry and strategic alignment between Trump and Xi Jinping.

    Read at Chatham House

  168. 168.
    2026-05-24 | diplomacy | 2026-W21 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    U.S. foreign policy operates in a cyclical pattern, alternating between periods of aggressive strategic activism—often triggered by major shocks (e.g., the China shock, conflicts)—and subsequent phases of retrenchment and downsizing. Retrenchment efforts typically manifest by reducing ideological commitment, narrowing global focus, limiting military overextension, or moving away from unilateral action. While policymakers may favor specific strategies, the inherent tension between these two modes suggests that future policy will be a blend of both. The primary implication is that the debate over regional priorities, the necessity of multilateral alliances, and the balance between global engagement and domestic focus will remain central and volatile.

    Read at CFR

  169. 169.
    2026-05-24 | china_indopacific | 2026-W21 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The article argues that U.S.-India relations, once robust, have significantly deteriorated and are currently 'rudderless,' making Secretary Rubio's visit a critical effort to repair trust. This decline is attributed to recent U.S. actions, including public embarrassment of India, favoring Pakistan, and imposing punitive tariffs on Indian energy purchases. Consequently, the U.S. must fundamentally shift its approach from transactional politics to sustained, consistent engagement to restore the partnership. For the relationship to stabilize, the U.S. must demonstrate renewed commitment to India's strategic interests, particularly in the context of great power competition.

    Read at CFR

  170. 170.
    2026-05-24 | middle_east | 2026-W21 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    Qatar is executing a systematic campaign of 'religious erasure' against its Baha'i minority, a pattern of discrimination that has historically targeted the community. Key evidence includes the mass denial and curtailment of residency and work permits, leading to the imminent expulsion of a significant portion of the Baha'i population, alongside unlawful detentions and legal harassment. Policy implications suggest that the U.S. government should condemn these severe violations of religious freedom and incorporate human rights concerns into its diplomatic and strategic engagement with Qatar.

    Read at CFR

  171. 171.
    2026-05-24 | china_indopacific | 2026-W21 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The global system is in a 'Gramscian interregnum,' driven by two tectonic shifts: a rapid redistribution of global power from the West to the East and South, and the socioeconomic dislocation caused by the digital age and automation. This confluence of factors is fueling great power competition, unraveling globalized markets, and spiking domestic inequality in developed democracies. For the U.S. to stabilize, its grand strategy must adopt a dual focus: promoting pluralistic cooperation to anchor the transition to a multipolar world, and fundamentally redesigning its social contract to prepare citizens for the digital economy and rebuild the political center.

    Read at CFR

  172. 172.
    2026-05-24 | china_indopacific | 2026-W21 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, United States

    The Chatham House analysis warns that Donald Trump's rhetoric and potential policy shifts regarding Taiwan threaten its future and undermine decades of US security guarantees. Key concerns include the suggestion of using arms sales as a negotiating chip with China, which could violate US assurances, and the downplaying of US commitment to conflict. By echoing Beijing's narrative, Trump risks legitimizing China's claims while sowing doubt among the Taiwanese public about the credibility of US support. Strategically, these actions could embolden Beijing to test American resolve and could lead to the US-China relationship being governed by Beijing's definition of 'strategic stability,' thereby weakening Taiwan's defense posture.

    Read at Chatham House

  173. 173.
    2026-05-24 | diplomacy | 2026-W21 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    The article argues that American global strategy requires a fundamental reevaluation due to a highly contested international environment and deep domestic dissatisfaction. The world is characterized by the decay of the liberal international order, rising power centers, and structural disruptors like AI and climate change. While the U.S. retains significant power, successful strategy must confront internal constraints, such as partisan polarization, recognizing that domestic stability is crucial for foreign leadership. Therefore, the path forward requires creative, multi-faceted ideas that integrate diverse American perspectives and move beyond traditional 'business-as-usual' foreign policy models.

    Read at CFR

  174. 174.
    2026-05-24 | middle_east | 2026-W21 | Topics: Middle East

    Iran's recent threats to close the Strait of Hormuz, utilizing drones and anti-ship missiles, underscore the continued strategic vulnerability of global maritime chokepoints. This action demonstrates how regional powers are weaponizing critical waterways to exert geopolitical pressure, immediately impacting global energy supplies and prices. For the Indo-Pacific and beyond, this signals that maritime control remains a primary tool of statecraft, necessitating enhanced international naval cooperation and contingency planning to mitigate the risk of energy supply disruptions.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  175. 175.
    2026-05-24 | energy | 2026-W21 | Topics: Climate, Middle East

    This briefing analyzes the critical juncture facing Gulf oil and gas producers, who must navigate the dual pressures of the global energy transition and escalating geopolitical instability. The discussion examines how these nations are adapting their economies and energy strategies in response to climate change and shifting global demand. Furthermore, it assesses the medium-to-long-term implications of regional conflicts, such as the US-Israeli war on Iran, on vital global supply routes like the Strait of Hormuz. Policymakers must therefore integrate climate risk, geopolitical volatility, and energy security into any strategic planning for the region.

    Read at Chatham House

  176. 176.
    2026-05-22 | energy | 2026-W21 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    Russia is significantly increasing its crude oil exports, primarily via the Black Sea, capitalizing on sanctions waivers and high Urals crude prices, despite persistently low traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. This pivot indicates Russia's successful diversification of its energy trade routes, with China and India remaining key buyers. Furthermore, maritime activity in the region is complicated by a high volume of fraudulently-flagged vessels, suggesting that illicit shipping methods are being used to circumvent sanctions and maintain global energy flows. Policy makers must monitor these shifting trade patterns and the use of deceptive maritime practices to accurately assess the effectiveness of energy sanctions.

    Read at USNI

  177. 177.
    2026-05-20 | middle_east | 2026-W21 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The Congressional report highlights significant, yet unquantified, combat losses sustained by U.S. forces during Operation Epic Fury in the Middle East. Key evidence includes reports of 42 fixed-wing or rotary-wing aircraft (including drones) damaged or lost, alongside an escalating cost estimate for the operation reaching $29 billion. The lack of a comprehensive Department of Defense assessment, coupled with the high and rising costs, suggests potential strategic overextension and resource strain. Policymakers must address the need for clearer risk assessment and resource allocation to manage future military engagements in the volatile region.

    Read at USNI

  178. 178.

    The article outlines how a successful modern foreign policy career requires blending traditional diplomatic expertise with private sector acumen. Juster's career trajectory—from international law to high-stakes diplomacy (e.g., the Gulf War) and subsequently to the technology sector—demonstrates this synthesis. Key evidence includes his work managing complex negotiations under duress and his involvement in co-founding the U.S.-India High Technology Group. The implication for policy is that effective geopolitical strategy must actively integrate private sector knowledge and technological considerations to manage modern economic and security challenges.

    Read at CFR

  179. 179.
    2026-05-18 | europe | 2026-W20 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine

    The analysis suggests that Russia's ability to sustain its war effort in Ukraine is facing increasing internal and external pressures. Key evidence points to a tightening economic crisis, evidenced by widespread blackouts and a noticeable scaling back of traditional military displays. Furthermore, the discussion highlights Putin's increasing isolation and micromanagement, suggesting that the strategic initiative may be slipping out of Moscow's control. Policymakers should monitor these signs of internal strain, as they indicate potential vulnerabilities and a possible shift in Russia's military and geopolitical calculus.

    Read at Chatham House

  180. 180.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The analysis concludes that China will hold the upper hand at the upcoming Trump-Xi summit, leveraging its dominance over critical minerals, rare earths, and magnet supply chains. This geopolitical leverage, combined with global instability (such as the Iran conflict), allows Beijing to dictate terms and buy time to consolidate its technological and industrial self-sufficiency. Strategically, the U.S. must avoid granting China a managed equilibrium by maintaining 'maximum pressure' on key sectors like AI and tech, rather than seeking broad agreements that could undermine American leadership.

    Read at CFR

  181. 181.
    2026-05-18 | middle_east | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the ongoing Iran War has triggered a severe global hunger crisis, exacerbated by U.S. aid cuts and policy neglect, pushing millions to the brink of starvation. Key evidence includes the termination of U.S. support in countries like Afghanistan, Somalia, and Yemen, coupled with supply chain disruptions and massive cost increases across the region. Policy recommendations are urgent: the U.S. must immediately deploy its $5.4 billion in unspent humanitarian funds, establish a humanitarian corridor through the Strait of Hormuz, and reinstate life-saving aid to critical nations.

    Read at CFR

  182. 182.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine

    The analysis cautions that the upcoming Trump-Xi summit must not result in short-term strategic concessions for the US, which risks undermining long-term stability. China is rapidly consolidating global power, leveraging US policy shifts and increasing its assertiveness across the Indo-Pacific and in technology. Strategically, the US must prioritize addressing the immediate crisis in Iran, where China holds significant leverage, and must also focus on joint cooperation on AI. Ultimately, the US must resist political impulses and pursue a robust strategy to counter China's growing challenge to global dominance.

    Read at Chatham House

  183. 183.

    The U.S.-China trade relationship remains defined by intense competition, characterized by persistent tariffs and tech export controls, despite temporary truces. While the conflict is driven by concerns over trade imbalances and China's adherence to global rules, the two economies remain deeply interdependent, making complete decoupling highly unlikely. Policy efforts are shifting away from achieving a definitive 'win' and toward managing this complex interdependence. Strategically, the U.S. must navigate the tension between protecting critical domestic industries and maintaining necessary global supply chains, suggesting a need for formalized mechanisms to manage future trade agreements.

    Read at CFR

  184. 184.

    China is consolidating its domestic energy control by restricting fuel exports to prioritize national needs, while simultaneously capitalizing on global energy instability to solidify its position as a dominant clean energy supplier. Key evidence includes record-high solar exports, driven by global supply chain shifts, and the implementation of detailed, binding national climate governance measures. These actions signal a dual strategy: enhancing energy self-sufficiency and using its manufacturing dominance to influence global energy transitions. Policymakers must anticipate that China will continue to tightly manage its energy market and leverage its climate leadership to deepen geopolitical influence.

    Read at CFR

  185. 185.
    2026-05-18 | energy | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, Energy

    The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz threatens to plunge the global energy system into an acute crisis, with repercussions extending far beyond surging oil and gas prices. The immediate evidence shows cascading economic failures, including flight cancellations, fuel rationing, and mandatory government fiscal revisions. Birol stresses that global economic stability is highly precarious, depending on de-escalation between major regional powers. Policymakers must urgently reassess energy security strategies, determining if the crisis will accelerate the energy transition or cause a significant global derailment.

    Read at Chatham House

  186. 186.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, United States

    The article argues that China views the Iran conflict as a critical case study demonstrating that military victory is unnecessary for strategic success. Iran's ability to impose costs by choking the Strait of Hormuz and spiking energy markets proved that economic disruption can be a more potent form of warfare than conventional combat. Beijing plans to apply this 'coercion over conquest' model to the Indo-Pacific, suggesting that layered campaigns of maritime quarantine, cyber disruption, and financial pressure are optimal. This strategy aims not for immediate conquest, but for cumulative pressure designed to constrain U.S. decision-making and exhaust its resources across multiple theaters.

    Read at CFR

  187. 187.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Middle East, Taiwan, Trade, United States, Indo-Pacific

    The article argues that the upcoming Beijing summit will be characterized by an asymmetry: President Trump's short-term political need for visible deals versus Xi Jinping's long-term strategic goal of maintaining stability and resisting compromise. Consequently, the summit is unlikely to resolve deep structural issues like China's overcapacity or the trade imbalance, instead producing only carefully choreographed, limited agreements and a temporary stabilization of the atmosphere. Policymakers should view the apparent symmetry of the meeting as a warning, indicating that underlying geopolitical and macroeconomic tensions remain unresolved, despite the superficial appearance of progress.

    Read at CFR

  188. 188.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: AI, China, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, Trade, United States, Indo-Pacific

    The Trump-Xi summit achieved a delicate détente, establishing a baseline of 'decent peace' that prioritizes stability and commercial cooperation over major geopolitical breakthroughs. Key evidence includes agreements on energy, trade (e.g., Boeing aircraft, Nvidia chips), and regional issues like the Strait of Hormuz, while China repeatedly emphasized Taiwan as the most critical issue for future stability. Strategically, the relationship is now defined by managed competition, with the pending $14 billion arms package to Taiwan serving as the most consequential test of this new, fragile truce. The outcome of this arms deal, and whether it is used as a bargaining chip, will determine the limits of the current détente.

    Read at CFR

  189. 189.
    2026-05-18 | energy | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, Energy

    The analysis argues that the current global inflation surge is primarily driven by soaring energy prices, which are exacerbated by geopolitical instability in the Middle East, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz. Key evidence points to the dramatic rise in energy costs (e.g., Brent crude near $100), establishing energy inflation as the dominant driver of broader CPI, overriding concerns about demand-side factors. Consequently, central banks face significant policy challenges, as this energy shock will trigger 'second-round effects' (cost-push inflation) that cannot be easily mitigated through traditional monetary policy rate hikes.

    Read at Chatham House

  190. 190.
    2026-05-18 | economy | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Economy

    The CATO argues that temporary gas tax holidays are merely political gimmicks and that Congress should instead permanently repeal the federal gas tax. While acknowledging that the war in Iran is the primary driver of high gas prices, the publication advocates for repealing the tax and devolving highway funding entirely to state and local governments. This decentralization is presented as a more efficient and less bureaucratic solution, allowing states—which are best positioned to assess local infrastructure needs—to manage funding through their own tax mechanisms. The policy implication is that Congress must use the upcoming highway bill reauthorization to permanently repeal the tax, thereby lowering prices and reducing federal overreach.

    Read at CATO

  191. 191.
    2026-05-18 | energy | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States, Energy

    Despite convening amid a severe energy crisis triggered by the Iran war, ASEAN failed once again to produce any binding, coordinated regional energy strategy. The failure is attributed to the bloc's inherent consensus-based structure, which allows individual member states to veto collective action due to competing national interests (e.g., prioritizing national reserves or aligning with bilateral powers). This paralysis not only stalled critical energy planning but also prevented progress on other major issues, such as the South China Sea Code of Conduct and the Myanmar crisis. The inability to act decisively undermines ASEAN's credibility and suggests that the organization remains structurally incapable of managing genuine, large-scale regional emergencies.

    Read at CFR

  192. 192.
    2026-05-18 | health | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, United States, Health

    The rescission of the 2009 endangerment finding removes the legal basis for federal climate regulation, despite the established scientific consensus that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions pose a severe threat to public health. The article argues that this policy decision risks increasing emissions, compounding long-term public health crises from extreme heat, air pollution, and disease. Strategically, this signals an abdication of global responsibility, potentially eroding international climate consensus and allowing competitors, particularly China, to widen their lead in green technology and geopolitical influence.

    Read at CSIS

  193. 193.
    2026-05-18 | economy | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, Economy

    Trump's approval rating regarding inflation has hit a historic low (-44%), surpassing the worst points recorded during both his and Biden's presidencies. This decline is attributed to persistent price increases, driven by energy shocks and geopolitical conflicts, which have pushed consumer prices above cumulative year-on-year wage gains. Economically, the failure to achieve falling prices, despite campaign promises, is eroding public confidence. Strategically, this deteriorating affordability trend poses a significant political risk for Trump, as economic stability and cost of living are paramount concerns for voters in the current election cycle.

    Read at CATO

  194. 194.
    2026-05-18 | americas | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Americas

    The article argues that the 2026 primary season serves as a critical barometer for internal party cohesion, determining the political landscape for the 2028 presidential cycle. Key evidence highlights the Republican struggle between the MAGA wing and traditional conservatives, testing the limits of Trump's influence in various state primaries. Simultaneously, the Democratic party is grappling with tensions between its moderate and progressive factions, as seen in recent special and state elections. Ultimately, the success or failure of these intraparty battles will dictate the platforms and candidates that enter the general election, signaling whether the parties can unify or if deep divisions will jeopardize their electoral viability.

    Read at Brookings

  195. 195.
    2026-05-18 | diplomacy | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Diplomacy

    The Chatham House analysis argues that 'maximum pressure' sanctions, especially those aimed at regime change, are inherently unstable and create a dangerous escalatory momentum toward military action. The evidence points to repeated failures—such as the decades-long sanctions on Cuba and the inability to topple the Venezuelan regime—demonstrating that sanctions alone are insufficient to achieve stated political goals. Consequently, the risk of military intervention is not limited to a single administration but is a systemic policy danger for any US government that implements punitive sanctions without a coherent strategy for de-escalation or negotiation. Policymakers must therefore view sanctions as a limited tool, ensuring they are paired with clear off-ramps to prevent unnecessary conflict.

    Read at Chatham House

  196. 196.

    India's foreign policy is defined by 'multialignment,' a self-interested strategy of maintaining strong, non-ideological ties with multiple global powers rather than adhering to any single bloc. This strategy is evidenced by India's simultaneous deepening of partnerships with the US (e.g., defense cooperation) while maintaining independent, critical relationships with Russia and France. Consequently, India is a major proponent of a multipolar global order, advocating for greater representation in international institutions. For external powers, the implication is that attempts to force alignment will fail; instead, a nuanced approach that works with India to maximize mutual gains is necessary for effective policy engagement.

    Read at CFR

  197. 197.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    India is strategically deepening its security cooperation with the United States and Indo-Pacific partners while rigorously maintaining its principle of strategic autonomy. Rather than joining formal, treaty-based alliances, India utilizes flexible, transactional partnerships to build material capacity and legitimacy, even while signaling concern about regional challenges like China's growing influence. This selective engagement allows New Delhi to maximize its geopolitical flexibility and avoid explicit confrontation, but it simultaneously strains relationships with partners who press for clearer alignment. Policymakers must recognize that India's foreign policy is defined by this careful balancing act, requiring sustained, nuanced diplomacy to manage its diversified ties (e.g., between the West and Russia).

    Read at CFR

  198. 198.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade

    The energy crisis stemming from the Middle East is creating a strategic opening for ASEAN nations, particularly the Philippines, to re-engage with China on joint oil and gas exploration in the South China Sea. This economic necessity provides a critical incentive for Beijing to cooperate on regional stability, allowing the Philippines to leverage its ASEAN chairmanship and growing US alliance to push for a binding South China Sea Code of Conduct (CoC). Policymakers should view this window of dialogue as a unique opportunity to advance international law (UNCLOS) and transform temporary energy cooperation into permanent maritime security agreements, thereby mitigating great power competition risks.

    Read at Chatham House

  199. 199.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: AI, China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The recent summit between Trump and Xi Jinping established a period of 'uneasy stability' rather than yielding specific, detailed commitments. Key discussions covered stabilizing trade (agriculture, aerospace), establishing protocols for AI governance, and managing tensions surrounding Taiwan. This tacit truce allows China to consolidate its technological autonomy and strengthen its economic security controls. For the United States and its allies, the implication is a narrow window to build industrial resilience and mitigate geopolitical risks in the face of continued strategic competition.

    Read at CFR

  200. 200.
    2026-05-18 | middle_east | 2026-W20 | Topics: Europe, Middle East

    The assassination of a development leader in government-controlled Yemen exposes the profound and systemic insecurity within the country, undermining stabilization efforts despite international backing. The article argues that this fragility stems from the government's inability to establish coherent command and control over security agencies, making security efforts reactive rather than preventative. This instability severely jeopardizes international aid and diplomatic missions, which are increasingly hesitant to operate in the region. Ultimately, the analysis suggests that top-down stabilization approaches, such as those backed by Saudi Arabia, will fail without achieving broader local legitimacy and political inclusion.

    Read at Chatham House

  201. 201.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Trade, United States

    The article argues that the Trump administration's strained relationship with US allies has significantly diminished American negotiating leverage against China. This weakening is evidenced by allied nations (including Canada, the UK, and South Korea) forging independent, lucrative economic and strategic partnerships with Beijing. Consequently, China is capitalizing on the fractured US alliance structure, gaining greater economic connectivity and fewer multilateral constraints. To counter this, the US and its partners must urgently rebuild allied cohesion and develop a unified, collective bargaining strategy on critical issues like semiconductors and minerals, independent of Washington's unilateral actions.

    Read at Chatham House

  202. 202.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Indo-Pacific

    The CFR briefing concludes that the Trump-Xi summit established a fragile, symbolic détente rather than achieving substantive structural reform. This temporary stability is largely predicated on the mutual acknowledgment of critical vulnerabilities, particularly China's control over rare earth minerals and global supply chains, which previously forced a trade truce. While the talks reduced immediate escalation risk, the underlying structural threats—including technology dependence, market access issues, and geopolitical flashpoints like Taiwan—remain unaddressed. Policymakers must therefore focus on mitigating these persistent vulnerabilities rather than relying on the diplomatic breakthroughs suggested by the summit.

    Read at CFR

  203. 203.
    2026-05-18 | defense | 2026-W20 | Topics: AI, China, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, Defense

    The upcoming summit between Xi and Trump is unlikely to result in direct discussions or agreements regarding China's growing nuclear arsenal or US missile defense projects. Instead, the analysis suggests that strategic stability can be advanced by focusing on shared threat assessments in emerging domains, such as artificial intelligence and outer space. Progress can be made by establishing dialogue on AI risks in escalation and reaffirming commitments to keep AI out of nuclear launch decisions. This shift allows the superpowers to build confidence and manage strategic tensions without confronting immediate nuclear limits, thereby providing a pathway for dialogue.

    Read at Chatham House

  204. 204.
    2026-05-18 | europe | 2026-W20 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that President Trump's plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Europe is strategically beneficial, asserting that the U.S. presence acts as an unnecessary 'glue' that prevents natural European self-sufficiency. Proponents argue that Europe has fundamentally changed, possessing nuclear deterrents and the capacity for regional defense, making American military dominance obsolete. Withdrawal will incentivize European states to rapidly rearm and form natural regional blocs, thereby restoring a balance of power without requiring constant American subsidies. Furthermore, reducing U.S. bases in Europe is presented as a positive development, as it limits American power projection and potential involvement in the Middle East.

    Read at CATO

  205. 205.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The state visit signaled a desire for 'strategic stability' and economic cooperation, evidenced by China's agreement to purchase major U.S. goods. However, the summit highlighted deep geopolitical divergences, particularly regarding Taiwan and the Middle East (Iran). Beijing appears to be using economic engagement to buy time and forestall tariffs, while the U.S. is leveraging the relationship to manage the Iran conflict. Policymakers must anticipate continued strategic competition, as both nations will use upcoming multilateral forums, such as the G20, to manage their conflicting priorities and maintain influence.

    Read at CSIS

  206. 206.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The Chatham House analysis argues that the upcoming Trump-Xi summit will focus on managing the US-China rivalry through transactional, short-term agreements rather than resolving deep structural competition. Both leaders are primarily constrained by domestic political pressures—Trump's election cycle and Xi's economic stability—leading them to prioritize immediate economic levers like trade purchases and technology access. While the US agenda is narrow and improvisational, China is leveraging its economic statecraft, particularly rare earth controls, to maintain an asymmetric stalemate. For policy makers, the report advises looking past immediate headlines, emphasizing that sustained data and execution on commitments, such as trade fulfillment, are more critical than the summit's stated outcomes.

    Read at Chatham House

  207. 207.

    The article argues that Taiwan faces a critical and complex energy security challenge, intensified by global conflicts and its deep reliance on imported fossil fuels. This vulnerability is compounded by the exponential energy demands of its semiconductor industry, which underpins its strategic global value, and the geopolitical threat of resource cutoff from China. To mitigate risks, Taiwan is rapidly diversifying energy sources away from the Middle East and increasing storage capacity. Policy must therefore urgently balance massive industrial energy growth, climate transition goals, and geopolitical instability to ensure sustained national resilience.

    Read at CSIS

  208. 208.

    The paper argues that Nordic-Baltic states are increasing engagement with the Indo-Pacific, driven by shared security concerns heightened by the war in Ukraine. The most significant area of convergence is the shared threat of subsea cable disruptions, which both regions view as a critical hybrid security challenge. While the Nordic-Baltic states are inclined toward a NATO-like defense architecture, the paper notes a structural disconnect with the diverse, often national-level, responses in the Indo-Pacific. Consequently, future collaboration is projected to be domain-specific—focusing on technical issues like critical infrastructure protection—rather than encompassing broad regional military or diplomatic alignment.

    Read at IISS

  209. 209.
    2026-05-18 | middle_east | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The conflict involving Iran poses a critical energy security threat due to its potential disruption of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global choke point for oil and LNG. The primary finding is that even temporary closures or blockades cause massive price volatility, with recovery being a slow, multi-year process due to complex logistics and damaged infrastructure. Economically, this translates to immediate and sustained cost-of-living increases for consumers, impacting household budgets and the price of goods like food. Policymakers must prioritize energy diversification and build resilience against geopolitical shocks to mitigate the severe economic fallout.

    Read at Brookings

  210. 210.

    The article argues that Russia's recent public displays, such as the diminished Victory Day parade, reveal deep structural cracks in its power and stability. Key evidence includes the military hardware's absence, slowing economic growth, and internal security tensions exacerbated by infighting and digital crackdowns. For policy, the analysis suggests that while Russia remains a threat, its declining geopolitical influence, coupled with the strengthening and consolidating hard-power capabilities of Europe and NATO, indicates a long-term erosion of Moscow's global standing.

    Read at CFR

  211. 211.
    2026-05-18 | economy | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Middle East, Trade, United States, Economy

    The article argues that recent geopolitical tensions, such as the Iran conflict, are revealing significant vulnerabilities in the dollar's global dominance and the efficacy of U.S. sanctions. Evidence shows that trade payments spiked through China's CIPS using RMB, bypassing the dollar-based SWIFT system, particularly following heightened U.S. sanctions threats. While the market demonstrated a temporary return to dollar reliance, the increasing reliability and cost-effectiveness of RMB alternatives suggest that dollar sanctions are encouraging the development of resistant financial mechanisms. Policymakers must recognize that the appeal of these alternatives stems from offering dollar system benefits with reduced exposure to U.S. sanctions, necessitating a strategic reassessment of global financial dependence.

    Read at CFR

  212. 212.
    2026-05-18 | middle_east | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Middle East, United States

    The analysis argues that while direct diplomatic talks offer a genuine path toward peace between Lebanon and Israel, achieving lasting security requires the re-emergence of a strong, sovereign Lebanese state. Key challenges include Israel's tendency to undermine state institutions through unilateral military actions, and the continued opposition from non-state actors like Hezbollah and Iran. Strategically, the US must pivot its focus from purely military confrontation to comprehensive support for Lebanese security sector reform and state capacity building, as this is identified as the only durable solution to the border conflict.

    Read at CSIS

  213. 213.

    The summit did not result in major breakthroughs but rather a return to managed stability in U.S.-China relations. Key outcomes include the establishment of a 'Board of Trade' and a 'Board of Investment,' which experts view as structural continuations of previous dialogues rather than radical new commitments. The discussions focused on managing existing trade flows and extending ceasefires, allowing China to maintain its economic status quo without making significant concessions. Strategically, this suggests that the U.S. must adjust its policy away from demanding fundamental systemic changes and instead focus on managing these stable, yet limited, bilateral agreements.

    Read at CSIS

  214. 214.
    2026-05-18 | economy | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, Economy

    The Brookings article analyzes alternative inflation metrics, such as the trimmed mean and median, which proponents argue are superior to traditional core indices because they statistically filter out extreme price outliers (noise). These methods remove the most volatile price changes from the distribution, aiming to provide a cleaner, more accurate measure of underlying inflation and economic slack. While these metrics are useful for identifying long-term trends, the analysis cautions that they can systematically understate inflation during periods of large, one-time shocks (e.g., tariffs or energy crises). Policymakers must be aware that relying solely on these filtered metrics could lead to misjudgments of the true inflationary trajectory, potentially impacting monetary policy decisions.

    Read at Brookings

  215. 215.
    2026-05-18 | energy | 2026-W20 | Topics: Climate, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Energy

    The report argues that while the EU successfully transitioned away from Russian gas, its new LNG strategy risks replacing one dependency with another, creating new concentration risks. Utilizing a dual-risk framework (price volatility, geopolitical exposure, and supplier concentration), the analysis demonstrates that reliance on a single supplier or contract type is inherently unstable. Therefore, the core policy recommendation is that the EU must adopt a resilient energy portfolio that balances diversified long-term contracts with retained spot-market flexibility. Ultimately, long-term security requires mitigating geopolitical risks and actively managing critical chokepoint vulnerabilities, rather than simply substituting one major supplier for another.

    Read at CSIS

  216. 216.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    U.S. allies are increasing diplomatic and economic ties with China, driven by growing frustration and concerns over the perceived unreliability of the United States as a security and trade partner. Key evidence includes high-level visits from European and Indo-Pacific leaders, resulting in agreements focused on diversifying trade, green energy cooperation, and AI technology. Experts caution that while these moves signal a desire to 'de-risk' and reduce reliance on the U.S., the strategy is largely symbolic and lacks coordinated substance. The primary implication is that allies are adopting an 'a la carte' hedging approach, which grants China increased time and space to build geopolitical leverage with the West.

    Read at CFR

  217. 217.

    The U.S.-China rivalry is defined by a state of 'mutually assured disruption,' where technological competition (semiconductor controls vs. rare earth embargoes) creates an unstable equilibrium. While the U.S. maintains a lead in AI frontier model development, China holds an advantage in deployment speed and cost, suggesting rough parity. Policy efforts should focus on immediate, proactive dialogue regarding AI safety and non-proliferation, drawing parallels to Cold War treaties. Crucially, any safety negotiations must be conducted while simultaneously tightening technological loopholes to maintain strategic leverage and prevent being outmaneuvered.

    Read at CFR

  218. 218.
    2026-05-16 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, China

    The current naval operational environment highlights significant resource strains and complex geopolitical challenges. While major assets like the USS Gerald R. Ford continue to deploy, the service faces personnel constraints, evidenced by potential hiring freezes due to Middle East conflict costs. Furthermore, regional flashpoints, such as Iran's attempts to control the Strait of Hormuz, underscore persistent maritime security risks. Policy must therefore balance sustained forward presence in the Western Pacific with careful resource management to maintain readiness and mitigate the impact of global conflict costs.

    Read at USNI

  219. 219.
    2026-05-16 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the concept of great power spheres of influence has evolved beyond traditional military boundaries, now manifesting in functional domains like critical technology and digital infrastructure. This shift allows powerful states, such as China, to consolidate an 'open sphere' by leveraging economic and technological influence, particularly if the United States makes unilateral concessions or is strategically distracted. The author warns that the U.S.'s willingness to make policy concessions regarding Taiwan and its diminishing reliability as a security guarantor could hasten China's consolidation of influence in the Indo-Pacific. Strategically, this necessitates that Washington update its understanding of modern spheres to prevent a major geopolitical division that could escalate into conflict.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  220. 220.

    Following a period of appeasement to the US under a volatile administration, European nations have undergone a strategic pivot toward self-reliance and collective action. This shift was catalyzed by perceived US overreach, prompting Europe to coordinate joint military exercises, activate anti-coercion tools, and establish a collective defense financing program. Economically, the EU is rapidly constructing a parallel trading system through major bilateral deals (e.g., India, Australia), reducing dependence on traditional transatlantic markets. These developments signal that Europe is building a more resilient, sovereign security and economic core, materially altering its geopolitical trajectory toward strategic autonomy.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  221. 221.
    2026-05-15 | economy | 2026-W20 | Topics: AI, Climate, Cybersecurity, Middle East, Trade, United States, Economy

    The article argues that corporate America's current silence regarding systemic threats—such as the erosion of the rule of law or the independence of federal institutions—poses a significant risk to democratic capitalism. This quietude contrasts sharply with past corporate activism, as business leaders fear political backlash rather than confronting fundamental institutional assaults. The core finding is that the rule of law and independent agencies (like the Federal Reserve) are the 'sine qua non' of stable economic activity, making their integrity paramount to market function. Policy implication suggests that corporate leaders must coordinate efforts to identify and defend these systemic 'redlines,' ensuring that the foundational laws and norms necessary for commerce remain protected.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  222. 222.
    2026-05-15 | defense | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Defense

    The Chief of Naval Operations warns that the ongoing costs associated with Middle East military operations threaten the Navy's ability to sustain its force generation and operational tempo. Without supplemental funding, the Navy may be forced to halt up to 15,000 enlisted accessions, cut necessary funds for training and station changes, and reduce retention bonuses. This budgetary constraint poses a significant threat to manpower accounts, potentially creating operational gaps at sea and limiting the service's capacity to conduct planned exercises or sustain current military commitments.

    Read at USNI

  223. 223.
    2026-05-15 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    Despite the public appearance of stabilization, the summit failed to resolve fundamental structural disputes between the U.S. and China, suggesting the competition remains deeply entrenched. Key issues, particularly Taiwan, trade imbalances, and geopolitical rivalry, were merely 'kicked down the road' through diplomatic rhetoric of 'strategic stability.' The analysis suggests that China is unlikely to make major concessions, viewing them as signs of weakness, meaning the relationship will continue to be managed through guarded competition rather than genuine cooperation. Policymakers must therefore anticipate persistent friction points and maintain vigilance regarding unresolved flashpoints to navigate the ongoing great power rivalry.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  224. 224.
    2026-05-14 | middle_east | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    The report details how Iran's asserted control over the Strait of Hormuz has severely restricted all maritime traffic, not just oil, posing significant risks to U.S. shippers and ports. Key evidence includes the dramatic reduction in daily transiting vessels and the ongoing constraint on non-oil commodities, despite temporary ceasefires. The primary implication is that the geopolitical instability requires Congressional attention regarding the safety of U.S.-flag vessels and the potential cascading economic effects on non-oil trade routes through the Persian Gulf.

    Read at USNI

  225. 225.
    2026-05-14 | middle_east | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    Maritime experts warn that Iran's push to charge fees or impose controls on Strait of Hormuz transits sets a dangerous global precedent for maritime choke points. This 'tollbooth model' threatens the fundamental principle of freedom of navigation, raising concerns that other nations could replicate similar restrictions in key global waterways. The resulting instability poses a systemic risk to global trade and energy supplies, forcing international actors to prepare for potential long-term disruptions and the need to secure alternative supply routes.

    Read at USNI

  226. 226.

    Beijing argues that the unraveling of the U.S.-led global order is ushering in an 'age of anarchy,' forcing China to abandon its anti-imperialist doctrine of non-interference. To safeguard its vast global commercial empire and critical supply chains, China is rapidly militarizing its foreign policy by building a comprehensive, forward-deployed security architecture. This strategy involves expanding intelligence collection, deepening security cooperation with foreign states, and deploying private security assets to protect infrastructure and trade routes far beyond its immediate periphery. This shift signals a move from diplomatic influence to overt, state-backed security enforcement to ensure the continuity of Chinese power.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  227. 227.

    This RAND report develops a scenario-planning framework to analyze the complex future mental health landscape of the UK Armed Forces community through 2045. The analysis identifies key stressors, including the evolving character of conflict, geopolitical uncertainty, and broader societal trends like increased mental health awareness and technological disruption. The core finding is that the sector must move beyond reactive care, requiring proactive, collaborative strategic planning across military, NHS, and third-sector organizations. Ultimately, the report stresses the need for adaptable and resilient support systems to meet the unique and growing mental health needs of personnel and veterans.

    Read at RAND

  228. 228.
    2026-05-13 | defense | 2026-W20 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States, Defense

    The Navy is mitigating the 'Walker Dip'—the decline of military medical skills during peacetime—by establishing deep civilian-military partnerships. These programs embed Navy medical personnel into civilian Level I trauma centers, providing invaluable, high-stress exposure that far surpasses traditional simulation training. This real-world practice ensures that corpsmen, who are often the first responders in combat, maintain peak proficiency in treating acute trauma. Strategically, these partnerships are crucial for maintaining combat readiness, guaranteeing that military medical staff can function effectively and calmly under the extreme pressures of actual deployment.

    Read at USNI

  229. 229.
    2026-05-13 | middle_east | 2026-W20 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States

    The U.K. has pledged a significant force package, including a destroyer, Typhoon jets, and autonomous mine-hunting/drone systems, to lead a multinational mission in the Strait of Hormuz. This commitment is designed to secure freedom of navigation and protect commercial shipping following a ceasefire agreement between the U.S. and Iran. The deployment of advanced, high-tech assets and associated funding underscores a sustained Western military effort to stabilize global maritime trade routes. Strategically, this signals a deep, coordinated commitment by NATO allies to maintaining the security of critical chokepoints, thereby deterring regional instability and protecting global energy supply lines.

    Read at USNI

  230. 230.
    2026-05-13 | africa | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, United States, Africa

    The persistence of violence in Nigeria stems primarily from systemic governance failures across federal, state, and local levels, rather than solely from external threats. Key evidence points to underfunded security services, a culture of judicial impunity, and the neglect of borders and rural areas, which create havens for armed groups. Compounding this are severe socio-economic pressures, including widespread poverty, high youth unemployment, and deadly resource disputes (e.g., farmer-herder conflicts). For stability, the report argues that Nigeria requires substantial and sustained investments in institutional capacity and governance reform to reverse the descent into instability.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  231. 231.
    2026-05-13 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: AI, China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The article argues that the U.S.-China relationship is defined by a long-term, multifaceted strategic competition, which China views through a historical lens of achieving self-sufficiency and resisting foreign leverage. Beijing's approach is characterized by deep strategic planning, leading it to resist fundamental structural economic changes despite seeking temporary, mutually advantageous agreements. For policy, the analysis warns that the greatest risk lies not in disagreement, but in the misunderstanding or ambiguous interpretation of agreements following high-level summits. Therefore, managing the relationship requires both powers to clearly articulate their core, long-term objectives to prevent temporary stabilization from obscuring deep strategic divergence.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  232. 232.
    2026-05-12 | americas | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States, Americas

    The article argues that traditional, brute-force anti-cartel strategies are ineffective and often backfire, empowering criminal groups rather than eliminating them. Instead, the U.S. should adopt a policy of "conditional repression," which involves setting clear red lines and applying severe pressure only when cartels cross them (e.g., through fentanyl trafficking or violence). This targeted approach aims to coerce cartels into reducing their most pernicious harms—such as extortion and environmental damage—while minimizing collateral damage. The U.S. should lead this shift, encouraging Latin American partners to adopt similar conditional strategies to stabilize the region.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  233. 233.

    While US instability creates a theoretical geostrategic vacuum for China, the article argues that Beijing's ability to capitalize on this opportunity is limited. Global powers are increasingly adopting a 'hedging' strategy, seeking to reduce vulnerability to both US and Chinese influence, suggesting the competition is not zero-sum. China faces specific hurdles, including deep skepticism in Europe (due to Russia ties and trade issues) and poor returns on its soft power investments. Consequently, the global balance of power is shifting, but the primary implication is that both the US and China risk losing global influence as nations prioritize strategic balancing over alignment.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  234. 234.
    2026-05-12 | middle_east | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The analysis concludes that any future nuclear deal with Iran must fundamentally differ from the 2015 JCPOA, as Iran's capabilities have advanced significantly since the treaty's inception. Key evidence shows that Iran has improved its centrifuge technology and installation speed, shifting the threat from merely enriching uranium to rapidly achieving weaponization. Consequently, a viable policy strategy must mandate comprehensive oversight, requiring Iran to fully implement the Additional Protocol and allowing inspectors access to military and non-nuclear research sites to monitor both fissile material production and covert weaponization activities.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  235. 235.
    2026-05-11 | energy | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, Energy

    The conflict in Iran highlights global vulnerability, arguing that the primary lesson is not regional division but the extreme risks associated with energy dependence. The key evidence is the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which choked off a fifth of global oil and LNG, triggering immediate and severe price spikes worldwide. This shock forced nations, such as the Philippines and Zambia, to declare national energy emergencies or suspend fuel levies. Consequently, the report implies that global policy must urgently prioritize energy diversification, supply chain resilience, and alternative energy sources to mitigate future geopolitical shocks.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  236. 236.
    2026-05-11 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: China, Middle East, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Indo-Pacific

    The analysis addresses the high stakes of US-China competition, particularly in the context of potential high-level meetings between leaders like Trump and Xi Jinping. It argues that the current political uncertainty within the US complicates traditional bipartisan foreign policy approaches, requiring policymakers to navigate a complex landscape. Key flashpoints discussed include trade, technology, Taiwan, and Ukraine, underscoring the breadth of the strategic rivalry. Consequently, the brief implies that US strategy must adapt to manage this intense competition while mitigating the risks posed by domestic political volatility.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  237. 237.
    2026-05-08 | defense | 2026-W19 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States, Defense

    The Trump administration’s decision to pull five thousand troops from Germany, alongside the potential cancellation of Tomahawk cruise missiles slated for deployment in 2027, poses a significant threat to European security and NATO deterrence. This move, driven by a desire to punish European criticism of the Iran war, exacerbates existing issues including depleted U.S. stockpiles due to the ongoing conflict and delayed deliveries of critical defense systems like NASAMS and HIMARS. The potential loss of the Tomahawk missiles, intended to counter Russian missiles, further weakens European defenses and highlights a growing credibility gap for U.S. deterrence. Ultimately, these actions contribute to a more vulnerable security environment for U.S. allies in Europe.

    Read at CFR

  238. 238.
    2026-05-08 | europe | 2026-W19 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, United States

    The discussion highlights that Europe's response to the Iran conflict is straining both its internal cohesion and its traditional geopolitical alliances. Key evidence suggests that the crisis forces Europe to confront deep divisions regarding conflict resolution and strategic alignment, particularly concerning the transatlantic relationship. For Europe to maintain stability and influence, the analysis argues that a unified, independent strategic direction is urgently required. Failure to achieve EU cohesion and define a clear, unified foreign policy risks limiting Europe's long-term autonomy and effectiveness in managing complex Middle Eastern flashpoints.

    Read at CFR

  239. 239.

    The ongoing Iran war shock has highlighted the vulnerability of global energy markets and underscored the urgent need for accelerated energy innovation. CFR’s new Global Energy Innovation Index reveals that innovation efforts have stagnated, particularly in areas like renewable energy adoption and patenting, leading to limited options for responding to crises. The article emphasizes that necessity drives invention, exemplified by fuel-switching measures and stockpile releases, but stresses the importance of sustained government investment in research and development alongside private sector innovation. Ultimately, a renewed focus on energy innovation, particularly in areas like geothermal and advanced energy storage, is crucial to mitigating future disruptions and ensuring long-term energy security.

    Read at CFR

  240. 240.
    2026-05-08 | defense | 2026-W19 | Topics: China, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, United States, Defense

    A recent CSIS analysis of the U.S.-Iran conflict highlights how Iran effectively countered U.S. battlefield successes through a sophisticated information war campaign utilizing deepfakes, false claims, and narratives exploiting American skepticism towards foreign intervention. The report emphasizes that simply achieving military victory is insufficient; maintaining public trust and shaping the narrative are crucial. To counter this, the U.S. needs to proactively rebuild public diplomacy, establish rapid response information warfare task forces, and prioritize speed and transparency in communication to establish a dominant narrative and expose disinformation networks.

    Read at CSIS

  241. 241.
    2026-05-08 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Middle East

    A recent CFR analysis highlights Mali as a critical linchpin in West Africa, now facing a severe jihadist siege fueled by a coordinated alliance between al-Qaeda-linked JNIM and Tuareg separatists. The attacks, including the death of a defense minister and the withdrawal of Russian Africa Corps mercenaries, demonstrate a significant escalation in violence and instability. Mali’s strategic importance is underscored by its role in great power competition, hosting a substantial Russian military presence and abundant natural resources, particularly lithium. This situation threatens the stability of the broader Sahel region, potentially emboldening extremist groups in neighboring countries and raising concerns about the future of the Alliance of Sahel States.

    Read at CFR

  242. 242.
    2026-05-08 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    The recent Israeli strikes on Beirut, marking the first since a ceasefire announcement, significantly undermines efforts to establish a stable peace in Lebanon and highlights the fragility of the nascent truce. The attacks, targeting a Hezbollah commander, demonstrate that ongoing conflict remains a major obstacle to a regional peace deal, particularly as Iran explores U.S. proposals. Furthermore, escalating tensions in the region, evidenced by continued U.S. military assessments of damage to facilities and shifting U.S. strategic priorities (including reduced reliance on regional partners), underscore the need for a diplomatic resolution. This situation demands a renewed focus on de-escalation and a return to direct negotiations between key parties to prevent further instability.

    Read at CFR

  243. 243.
    2026-05-08 | china_indopacific | 2026-W19 | Topics: AI, China, Cybersecurity, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Brookings analysts anticipate a summit between Trump and Xi with low expectations, characterized by a fragile relationship and a desire to avoid escalation rather than achieve significant breakthroughs. While both leaders seek to maintain a trade truce and avoid conflict, risks remain, particularly concerning tariff restorations and potential shifts in U.S. policy on Taiwan. The meeting's significance lies in its role as a crucial communication channel to prevent miscalculation, and there's a potential for discussions on AI safety and cooperation, though deeper issues like talent competition and fentanyl remain unresolved.

    Read at Brookings

  244. 244.
    2026-05-08 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: China, Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Foreign Affairs’ analysis, dated May 8, 2026, posits that Iran has weaponized the Strait of Hormuz, creating a sustained economic threat comparable to the 1973 Arab oil embargo. Evidence suggests Iran’s sustained attacks utilizing mines, missiles, and drones have effectively blocked the waterway despite U.S. and Israeli military efforts. This situation is characterized by a durable leverage point for Tehran, stemming from its investment in asymmetric warfare capabilities and a global economy increasingly reliant on Gulf oil. Policy implications necessitate a shift from relying solely on military force and diplomatic pressure to building energy resilience, diversifying supply chains, and bolstering shipping routes to mitigate future disruptions and diminish Iran’s strategic advantage.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  245. 245.
    2026-05-08 | energy | 2026-W19 | Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States, Energy

    The analysis argues that geopolitical instability in the Strait of Hormuz is creating a major energy shock, projecting a difficult combination of lower global growth and higher inflation. This energy shortfall presents a significant quandary for central banks, forcing them to navigate policy while struggling to meet inflation targets. Although the US is somewhat insulated from certain price shocks, rising oil prices will disproportionately impact low and moderate-income households, severely eroding consumer confidence. Policymakers must therefore remain highly cautious, as the uncertainty surrounding the shock's duration and magnitude complicates monetary policy decisions.

    Read at CFR

  246. 246.
    2026-05-08 | china_indopacific | 2026-W19 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, United States, China

    A CSIS report argues that despite increased speculation and geopolitical pressures, Japan and South Korea are unlikely to develop nuclear weapons in the foreseeable future. The analysis highlights deeply ingrained domestic political and bureaucratic constraints, as well as a continued reliance on the U.S. security umbrella, as primary deterrents. While concerns about U.S. commitment and regional instability may fuel debate, the costs and risks associated with nuclear proliferation remain significant obstacles. This suggests policymakers should focus on strengthening alliance commitments and addressing regional security concerns through non-nuclear means.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  247. 247.
    2026-05-08 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The CFR report examines the fluctuating aid flow to Gaza from Arab countries following the 2023 Israel-Hamas conflict, revealing a complex interplay of geopolitical interests and humanitarian concerns. Initially, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE provided significant aid, with Egypt and Jordan utilizing land and air corridors, while Saudi Arabia and the UAE relied on airdrops. However, a 37% decline in aid deliveries in early 2026, coinciding with the outbreak of the U.S.-Iran conflict and Israel’s subsequent closure of aid routes, significantly worsened the humanitarian crisis. This drop was exacerbated by Israel’s restrictions on international aid organizations operating in Gaza. The situation underscores the challenges of delivering aid to a conflict zone and the impact of regional conflicts on humanitarian efforts, highlighting the need for robust diplomatic solutions and secure access corridors.

    Read at CFR

  248. 248.
    2026-05-08 | europe | 2026-W19 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    This CFR analysis details a shift in U.S. military deployment in Europe, driven by tensions surrounding the Iran conflict and President Trump’s disagreements with European allies. The U.S. is reducing its troop presence, aiming for pre-Ukraine war levels, with a planned withdrawal of approximately 5,000 troops from Germany. Despite this drawdown, the U.S. maintains a significant military footprint across Europe, primarily through the Enhanced Forward Presence (EFP) in Eastern European NATO countries and ongoing training exercises. These deployments focus on forward defense, logistics, and training allied forces, particularly in support of Ukraine’s defense. The analysis highlights the continued importance of U.S. forces in bolstering NATO’s security posture and managing nuclear assets within the alliance.

    Read at CFR

  249. 249.
    2026-05-08 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: Climate, Middle East

    The GCC monarchies are actively pursuing strategies to enhance their regional influence and economic resilience through national visions focused on diversification. While these efforts aim to boost geopolitical and soft power, the region faces significant structural headwinds. Key challenges include demographic stagnation, escalating regional instability, and the mounting impacts of climate change. Policymakers must also account for persistent internal debates concerning political freedoms and human rights when formulating regional strategies.

    Read at Chatham House

  250. 250.

    The conflict in Iran presents a mixed strategic picture for Beijing, offering diplomatic opportunities by allowing China to position itself as a neutral mediator and distracting the U.S. from the Indo-Pacific. However, these gains are offset by significant economic instability, energy market volatility, and the exposure of China's limited operational reach in the region. Strategically, Beijing's primary concern remains maintaining stability with the U.S. to ensure its continued rise, leading it to prioritize de-escalation over deep regional involvement. Ultimately, China must navigate the tension between asserting regional influence and mitigating the severe economic risks posed by disrupted global supply chains.

    Read at Brookings

  251. 251.

    The analysis examines the K-shaped economy, which describes a widening divergence between the wealthy and the less well-off. However, the report challenges the prevailing narrative of decline, noting that real, inflation-adjusted wages for the lowest earners have shown significant cumulative gains, contradicting the 'K' story. The perceived divergence is often attributed to the wealthy's ability to draw on savings during economic shocks, which affects consumption patterns more than underlying wage growth. Policymakers must therefore distinguish between wage trends and consumption patterns, recognizing that economic shocks exacerbate visible inequality even if core wage data remains stable.

    Read at CFR

  252. 252.
    2026-05-08 | china_indopacific | 2026-W19 | Topics: AI, China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The anticipated Trump-Xi summit is expected to center on extending the existing trade truce, with the U.S. seeking large-scale Chinese purchases of goods and China aiming to preserve access to U.S. technology. Beyond trade, Beijing will subtly press for rhetorical concessions on Taiwan and the adoption of a 'mutual respect' framework, signaling an implicit acceptance of China's core interests. The outcome is highly significant, as it will define the U.S.-China relationship trajectory, determining whether the relationship settles into stable, managed cooperation or escalates into deeper strategic tension across global issues like AI and the Middle East.

    Read at Brookings

  253. 253.
    2026-05-08 | china_indopacific | 2026-W19 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    According to a CSIS press briefing, the upcoming Trump-Xi summit, delayed by six weeks, aims to address five U.S. priorities ("the five Bs") and three Chinese priorities ("the three Ts") including Taiwan, tariffs, and technology. China enters the meeting in a stronger position due to recent U.S. actions and a perceived improvement in its relative power, and is likely to pressure the U.S. regarding Taiwan, potentially seeking changes to U.S. policy on arms sales and transit for Taiwanese leaders. The briefing suggests China is well-prepared and confident, while the U.S. lacks a unified approach and is not adequately investing in its long-term economic foundations.

    Read at CSIS

  254. 254.

    The global economy faces unprecedented fragility, driven by the intersection of opaque private credit growth and severe geopolitical shocks. The primary stressor is the ongoing Iran conflict, which threatens critical shipping lanes, causing commodity shortages and forcing nations into inflationary, protectionist policies. This confluence of high global debt, supply shocks, and central bank dilemmas suggests a period of unpredictable market behavior and potential financial market dysfunction. Policymakers must monitor deteriorating financial market functioning and the risk of systemic stress across major economies.

    Read at CFR

  255. 255.
    2026-05-08 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    This CFR analysis argues that the recent conflict with Iran offers three key lessons for nuclear security negotiations. First, military strikes alone are insufficient to dismantle a sophisticated nuclear program, as demonstrated by the limited impact of air attacks and the ongoing challenges faced by the IAEA. Second, reliance on force can incentivize concealment of nuclear activities, hindering transparency and inspection efforts. Finally, the conflict highlighted the inherent disparities within the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), particularly regarding access to nuclear technology for nations that did not initially test weapons. Consequently, negotiators should aim for ‘better-than-nothing’ deals, focusing on reaffirming the NPT’s core bargain and establishing a framework for continued dialogue and inspection, even if complete disarmament remains elusive.

    Read at CFR

  256. 256.
    2026-05-08 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: AI, China, Cybersecurity, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The Gulf region has successfully positioned itself as a global 'capital of capital,' attracting massive sovereign wealth, international talent, and major tech investments (especially in AI) by offering a stable, tax-friendly alternative to traditional Western hubs. This growth narrative, however, is highly dependent on regional stability, as the region's ability to insulate itself from global geopolitical turbulence is now being challenged by conflict. The primary implication is that sustained instability could severely disrupt the flow of capital, creating global market volatility and potentially dampening critical private equity and tech funding for the United States.

    Read at CFR

  257. 257.
    2026-05-08 | diplomacy | 2026-W19 | Topics: AI, China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Diplomacy

    The global press freedom index has reached its worst level in 25 years, driven by a sharp increase in the criminalization of journalism across most nations. Key threats include state authorities leveraging national security and defense secrets, alongside powerful corporate and political entities utilizing abusive lawsuits to suppress coverage. On the ground, authoritarian regimes are employing sophisticated tactics, such as internet blackouts and exploiting global chaos, to dismantle independent reporting. Policymakers must recognize that the erosion of free press is a systemic risk, requiring targeted diplomatic and technical support for journalists and civil society to maintain democratic accountability.

    Read at CFR

  258. 258.
    2026-05-08 | economy | 2026-W19 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States, Economy

    Following the disruptions caused by Iran’s control of the Strait of Hormuz, Southeast Asian nations are increasingly recognizing the strategic and economic value of the Strait of Malacca, a critical global maritime chokepoint. The crisis demonstrated how a single point of control can exert significant leverage over the world economy, particularly impacting energy supplies. Evidence of this shift includes Indonesian Finance Minister’s proposal to implement tolls on ships transiting the Strait, alongside discussions among Indonesian and Malaysian political elites. Furthermore, Thailand is actively pursuing a ‘land bridge’ project to circumvent the strait. This highlights a growing concern about supply chain vulnerabilities and the potential for regional states to assert greater control over this vital waterway. The potential monetization of the Strait of Malacca represents a significant shift in regional strategic thinking.

    Read at CFR

  259. 259.
    2026-05-08 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: Middle East

    Chatham House's recent analysis finds that the ongoing US-Israel war with Iran has effectively sidelined the Gaza ceasefire, leading to deteriorating humanitarian conditions and a narrowing of political options within the territory. The report highlights how the conflict is reshaping the calculations of regional and international actors, solidifying temporary border arrangements and security measures. Consequently, the webinar suggests a shift towards a more permanent, albeit precarious, status quo in Gaza. This underscores the urgent need for humanitarian aid and a re-evaluation of long-term strategies for the region.

    Read at Chatham House

  260. 260.
    2026-05-08 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    A Chatham House report argues that the ongoing Iran war has diverted international attention and pressure, allowing the Gaza ceasefire to stagnate and conditions to deteriorate. Hamas is unwilling to disarm without a clear political pathway and faces disincentives from Israeli-backed militias, while Israel sees little incentive to withdraw troops and is expanding its control zone. The failure to allow the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG) to enter further exacerbates the situation, hardening positions and hindering any progress towards a lasting resolution.

    Read at Chatham House

  261. 261.
    2026-05-08 | diplomacy | 2026-W19 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Diplomacy

    The podcast questions whether King Charles III's state visit can salvage the 'special relationship,' arguing that the alliance is currently strained by structural geopolitical issues. Experts highlight that the US is increasingly reluctant to bear the full burden of European defense, challenging the traditional transatlantic security framework. Consequently, the discussion emphasizes that the UK and Europe must develop independent strategic policies—particularly regarding NATO and regional conflicts like Iran—rather than relying solely on historical ties or US goodwill. The overall implication is a necessary pivot toward greater European autonomy and a redefinition of the UK's role in global security.

    Read at Chatham House

  262. 262.

    The development of superintelligence, exemplified by DeepMind's work, represents a transformative, dual-use technology comparable to nuclear power, promising massive gains in fields like medicine (e.g., AlphaFold). The analysis highlights that while pioneers like Demis Hassabis approach AI from a fundamental scientific motivation, the race dynamic makes global safety governance challenging. Strategically, the findings suggest that emerging markets view AI as a primary engine for development, contrasting with the caution seen in advanced economies due to job displacement fears. Policymakers must therefore focus on guiding AI development toward applications with clear human benefits to ensure global acceptance and manage the inherent risks of this powerful new technology.

    Read at CFR

  263. 263.
    2026-05-08 | africa | 2026-W19 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Africa

    Recent coordinated attacks in Mali, including the death of the Defense Minister, highlight a deteriorating security situation and the failure of military juntas and their Russian partners to effectively combat militant groups. The attacks, involving both al Qaeda-linked groups and Tuareg separatists, demonstrate a complex conflict driven by local grievances and separatist aspirations, not just terrorism. The U.S., as it re-engages in the Sahel, risks repeating Russia's mistakes by prioritizing security for resources and neglecting governance and local dynamics, necessitating a more multidimensional approach focused on genuine partnership and addressing underlying economic and political issues.

    Read at CSIS

  264. 264.
    2026-05-08 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    This CFR analysis argues that Trump’s ‘Project Freedom’ – primarily a naval escort operation and blockade – will fail to open the Strait of Hormuz and resolve the ongoing conflict with Iran. The strategy relies on overly optimistic assumptions about Iran’s economic vulnerability and the immediate impact of a blockade, while failing to account for Iran’s resilience and ability to adapt through alternative trade routes. Evidence suggests Iran’s continued capacity to attack commercial vessels and retaliate underscores the futility of force-based approaches. Ultimately, a diplomatic solution remains the only viable path forward, despite the current impasse.

    Read at CFR

  265. 265.
    2026-05-08 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Ukraine

    The war in Iran is unlikely to establish China as a direct replacement for the US as the Gulf's security provider, but it is accelerating the region's strategic shift away from absolute reliance on American guarantees. This dynamic allows China to gain influence by positioning itself as a diplomatic and technological partner, rather than a military guarantor. Gulf states are diversifying their defense procurement and seeking alternative regional stability models. Consequently, China is well-positioned to promote its own normative framework for regional cooperation, making its principles appealing to nations seeking stability without US-centric security commitments.

    Read at Chatham House

  266. 266.
    2026-05-08 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    A CFR analysis published in 2026 assesses the military campaign in the Iran War as largely ineffective in achieving strategic objectives. Despite significant damage inflicted on Iranian conventional weapons and naval capabilities, Iran continues to control vital waterways like the Strait of Hormuz and launch attacks, demonstrating a resilience that undermines the campaign’s success. The analysis highlights a crucial distinction between the ‘war of destruction’ – where the US Air Force achieved relative success – and a ‘war of disruption’ focused on countering Iranian drone and missile attacks, which the US has struggled with, leading to continued disruption of maritime traffic. Ultimately, the report concludes that Iran has effectively won the air war that matters most, highlighting the limitations of airpower in complex asymmetric conflicts.

    Read at CFR

  267. 267.
    2026-05-08 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, United States

    Lebanon is facing a state of extreme instability, caught between repeated Israeli military campaigns and the regional proxy conflict waged by Iran through Hezbollah. The local population is critically exhausted by successive crises—economic, political, and military—while internal dynamics are deeply fractured, particularly within the Shia community, which is split between ideological loyalists and secular independents. Consequently, external diplomatic efforts, such as US-brokered negotiations, must navigate these deep internal divisions and avoid superficial political gestures to achieve any sustainable path to peace.

    Read at CFR

  268. 268.

    President Trump has paused the U.S. military’s Hormuz shipping mission, citing progress in negotiations with Iran and a desire to facilitate a final agreement. This decision follows escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, including attacks on U.S.-flagged vessels and heightened concerns over Iranian nuclear activity. The move reflects a strategic shift towards prioritizing a diplomatic resolution, although the U.S. maintains a naval blockade. Rising energy prices, exacerbated by the situation in the Persian Gulf, are a significant consequence of this policy change, highlighting the vulnerability of global energy markets to geopolitical instability. This action underscores a renewed focus on diplomacy within the Middle East, particularly concerning Iran.

    Read at CFR

  269. 269.
    2026-05-07 | middle_east | 2026-W19 | Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    France’s deployment of its Carrier Strike Group (CSG) to the Middle East, spearheaded by the Charles de Gaulle, reflects a strategic effort to bolster maritime security amid heightened tensions and the ongoing conflict between the U.S., Israel, and Iran. This move, part of a multinational coalition with the UK, aims to reassure commercial shipping operators, conduct mine clearance operations, and provide crisis exit options. The deployment underscores France’s commitment to maintaining a defensive posture and contributing to stability in a volatile region, particularly concerning the Strait of Hormuz. France’s actions are supported by a broader European effort, Operation Aspides, and involve collaboration with nations like Italy and the Netherlands, demonstrating a coordinated response to protect maritime trade routes.

    Read at USNI

  270. 270.
    2026-05-07 | china_indopacific | 2026-W19 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    A recent U.S. Army test successfully launched a Tomahawk cruise missile 390 miles to a target in the Philippines, demonstrating the capability to strike key locations within the first island chain. This test utilized the Mid-Range Capability, a system designed to deploy SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles for extended maritime strikes, and was conducted as part of ongoing exercises to deter potential aggression from China. The deployment of U.S. missile systems in the Philippines, particularly near Fort Magsaysay, has heightened tensions with Beijing and underscores the U.S. military’s strategy to contest Chinese influence in the region. This test validates the Army's MDTF capabilities and highlights the importance of strategic positioning within the first island chain.

    Read at USNI

  271. 271.
    2026-05-06 | defense | 2026-W19 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, United States, Defense

    The USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group has concluded a record-breaking 315-day deployment, marking the longest since the Cold War, and is returning to Naval Station Norfolk for extensive maintenance. The deployment involved operations across the Atlantic, Southern Command (Venezuela), and the Middle East (Iran), reflecting a dynamic and evolving strategic posture. This extended deployment highlights the ongoing demands on US naval assets and underscores the need for robust maintenance and potential force structure adjustments. The Acting Secretary of the Navy emphasized the importance of crew welfare following the demanding operational tempo.

    Read at USNI

  272. 272.

    This RAND report, published in 2026, argues that the U.S. Department of War can effectively leverage security force assistance (SFA) activities in Latin America to bolster homeland defense, counter transnational threats, and advance U.S. strategic influence. The report highlights the increasing convergence of threats from state adversaries and non-state actors, emphasizing the need for innovative SFA approaches, particularly utilizing the Army Security Cooperation Group—South and National Guard State Partnership Programs. Ultimately, the report suggests that targeted SFA can be a cost-effective tool for addressing regional challenges and countering Chinese influence.

    Read at RAND

  273. 273.
    2026-05-04 | economy | 2026-W18 | Topics: AI, China, Middle East, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Economy

    The upcoming mandatory review of the USMCA is expected to be highly contentious, driven by historical U.S. tariff actions that have undermined regional integration and caused significant strain, particularly with Canada. In response, Mexico and Canada are attempting to hedge against an unreliable Washington by forming independent bilateral partnerships. While the agreement may remain in force even without immediate consensus, the U.S. may attempt to leverage the review to push its neighbors toward a 'rules of control' paradigm, forcing common external tariffs or export controls, especially concerning China. For stability, the U.S. should aim for an expeditious reaffirmation of the USMCA with minimal modifications to prevent trade uncertainty.

    Read at CFR

  274. 274.

    Agrawal's career highlights that effective foreign policy analysis requires integrating diverse, global perspectives, a skill honed by observing massive technological and geopolitical shifts. His experience tracking the impact of digital transformation—from cable TV to smartphones—demonstrates that modern global events are rarely localized, having profound, varied ripple effects across different economies and societies. For policy strategists, this implies a critical need to move beyond national silos, adopting a holistic view that accounts for how global power dynamics (e.g., energy conflicts) disproportionately affect disparate regions. Furthermore, the rapid proliferation of affordable technology must be factored into policy planning, as it fundamentally alters political structures and social harmony in developing nations.

    Read at CFR

  275. 275.
    2026-05-04 | americas | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Americas

    The article argues that Virginia Democrats are engaging in extreme partisan actions, notably through gerrymandering, to consolidate political power within wealthy Northern Virginia suburbs. Key evidence cited includes the proposed district map's bias toward elite areas, alongside controversies regarding local policies on gender identity, the handling of alleged assaults by illegal aliens, and legislative efforts to restrict law enforcement cooperation in deportations. The piece concludes that these actions represent a systemic threat to the rule of law and public safety, serving as a warning intended to mobilize conservative voters for upcoming state and national elections.

    Read at Heritage

  276. 276.

    The article argues that outer space is vulnerable to disruption, mirroring how a limited force can destabilize a vital choke point like the Strait of Hormuz. This risk is amplified because most operational satellites are located in Low Earth Orbit (LEO), a region susceptible to anti-satellite weapons and debris creation. To protect the burgeoning space economy and maintain freedom of passage, the U.S. must prioritize diplomatic engagement with China and Russia to establish modern space governance. Strategically, the U.S. should also invest in technologies for debris mitigation and reassess its military reliance on LEO, thereby avoiding a potential conflict requiring superior military force.

    Read at CSIS

  277. 277.
    2026-05-04 | europe | 2026-W18 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    While King Charles III's state visit offers symbolic reassurance of enduring transatlantic ties, the report argues that it cannot resolve the deep structural forces pulling the U.S.-UK alliance apart. Key evidence points to significant strategic divergence, including disagreements on Iran, trade tariffs, climate policy, and NATO burden-sharing, compounded by political instability in both nations. Consequently, the 'special relationship' is undergoing a necessary recalibration, with the UK increasingly prioritizing partnerships with EU member states and viewing Europe as a more stable strategic anchor than the assumption of an unbreakable transatlantic bond. Policy implications suggest that the UK must focus on deepening continental cooperation to mitigate the risks of strategic isolation and geopolitical uncertainty.

    Read at CFR

  278. 278.
    2026-05-04 | middle_east | 2026-W18 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Trade

    The Chatham House analysis argues that a naval coalition in the Strait of Hormuz must prioritize strategic design and regional ownership over sheer military might to ensure long-term stability. Drawing lessons from past anti-piracy efforts, the coalition should compartmentalize responsibilities into specialized task groups and implement a tiered escort system for high-value vessels. Crucially, the strategy must limit the use of force solely to deter attacks, rather than attempting to militarily defeat Iran. By adopting a structured, regionally-led approach, the coalition can restore confidence in shipping while managing the persistent threat of conflict.

    Read at Chatham House

  279. 279.
    2026-05-04 | china_indopacific | 2026-W18 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, United States

    The article argues that the fall of Saigon taught the U.S. that geopolitical history is non-linear and that policymakers should resist the temptation of defeatism or over-predicting the future. Key evidence cited is the historical pattern that following the perceived failure of Vietnam, the U.S. emerged as a dominant power, and rival powers (China, USSR) made subsequent strategic errors. The primary policy implication is a warning against assuming current geopolitical trends are preordained; instead, the U.S. must remain flexible and capitalize on unpredictable opportunities and challenges, rather than succumbing to pessimism.

    Read at CFR

  280. 280.
    2026-05-04 | energy | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Energy

    The article argues that OPEC's ability to control oil prices through production quotas is largely symbolic, citing that geological and technical realities prevent rapid, precise adjustments to oil output. Evidence suggests that quotas are frequently ignored, with the UAE exceeding its limits and its production volatility statistically mirroring that of the decentralized US market. Therefore, OPEC functions less as an economic cartel and more as a political club, using the appearance of control to rally against the West. The UAE's exit signals that geopolitical differences with regional rivals, such as Saudi Arabia, now outweigh the strategic importance of anti-Western solidarity.

    Read at CATO

  281. 281.
    2026-05-04 | diplomacy | 2026-W18 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, United States, Diplomacy

    Michael Mandelbaum argues that U.S. foreign policy is uniquely defined by three pillars: an unusually ideological focus, a distinctive use of economic statecraft, and the strong role of democratic public opinion. Unlike most nations that prioritize power (realism), the U.S. frequently attempts to promote its political ideas and uses economic tools for political ends. This ideological commitment, which Mandelbaum calls the 'foreign policy of ideas,' suggests that American strategy will continue to blend traditional power interests with a strong emphasis on promoting democracy and human rights globally. This framework implies that the U.S. will often intervene to protect values, even when such actions do not yield immediate economic or security benefits.

    Read at CFR

  282. 282.
    2026-05-04 | economy | 2026-W18 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, United States, Economy

    The article argues that geopolitical instability in the Middle East is causing significant economic stress in the U.S. due to soaring gasoline prices, which disproportionately burden lower-income and rural households. Because American life is heavily car-dependent and demand for gasoline is relatively price inelastic, consumers have few immediate alternatives to driving, regardless of cost. While short-term policy fixes are impossible, the crisis underscores the urgent need for long-term reforms, including stricter fuel economy standards and better urban planning to reduce reliance on private vehicles. Strategically, the authors predict that elevated gas prices will become a major political flashpoint in upcoming elections, potentially destabilizing incumbents across various levels of government.

    Read at Brookings

  283. 283.
    2026-05-04 | 2026-W18 | Topics: China, Middle East

    Reduced Export Demand: The war has weakened global economic growth, with the IMF cutting its 2026 global GDP forecast to 3.1%. Major Chinese export markets — including India, Southeast Asian nations, and the UAE — have seen sharp declines in projected import growth. Since nearly one-third of China's GDP growth in 2025 came from net exports, this drop in foreign demand threatens to further dampen China's economic momentum. Energy Disruptions: Over one-third of China's crude oil supply transits the Strait of Hormuz annually. Since the war began, domestic gasoline prices in China have surged 39% and LNG prices by 42% — record increases surpassing even the spike following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Nevertheless, China is better insulated than most economies thanks to its massive strategic oil reserves (~1.4 billion barrels), diversified energy suppliers, heavy reliance on domestic coal, and comparatively high EV adoption rates. Supply Chain Challenges: Rising energy and commodity costs are squeezing Chinese manufacturers. Semiconductors face shortages of helium and naphtha; agriculture is being hit by soaring fertilizer and pesticide prices; and the plastics industry is under severe strain, with polypropylene prices rising 40% between February and mid-April. Investment Risks: The Middle East was China's top overseas investment destination in 2025, with over $26 billion committed. Iranian retaliatory strikes have already damaged Chinese-linked infrastructure, and ongoing instability threatens both existing and future Chinese investments across the region. In conclusion, while China is more resilient than many neighbors, the Iran War poses substantial short-term headwinds across multiple dimensions of its economy.

    Read at CSIS

  284. 284.
    2026-05-04 | middle_east | 2026-W18 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States

    The article argues that a significant, underappreciated risk for U.S. financial and tech markets is the potential reduction of capital flowing from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). Historically, GCC nations have heavily invested in U.S. assets to diversify away from volatile energy revenues, but the Iran war and resulting economic strain are causing these nations to prioritize domestic spending and infrastructure repair. A pullback in this crucial capital source could severely challenge U.S. hyperscalers and financial intermediaries, forcing them to rely more heavily on debt at a time when valuations are already under scrutiny.

    Read at CFR

  285. 285.
    2026-05-04 | middle_east | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East

    The Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) faces extreme vulnerability due to a deep political deadlock between the KDP and PUK, which prevents the formation of a stable regional government. This internal disunity severely undermines the KRI's ability to project influence, manage domestic challenges, or resist the erosion of its autonomy by the federal government in Baghdad. Compounding this crisis, the KRI is under constant threat from Iran-backed militias, while Baghdad simultaneously curtails its financial and oil export controls. Consequently, the KRI lacks a unified front to negotiate with regional powers or international actors, increasing the risk of a major political or security rupture.

    Read at Chatham House

  286. 286.
    2026-05-04 | energy | 2026-W18 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Energy

    The UAE's announced exit from OPEC and OPEC+ signals a significant weakening of the cartel's ability to coordinate and influence global oil supply. This move is driven by Abu Dhabi's desire for greater energy policy autonomy and a growing geopolitical divergence from Saudi Arabia. The withdrawal adds to market unpredictability, suggesting that major producers are increasingly prioritizing national strategic interests over coordinated cartel pricing efforts. This shift implies a move toward decentralized energy policies, challenging OPEC's historical role as the primary arbiter of global oil prices.

    Read at CFR

  287. 287.
    2026-05-04 | china_indopacific | 2026-W18 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The ongoing instability in the Gulf is creating systemic global risk by eroding energy and trade buffers, threatening macroeconomic stability across the Indo-Pacific. This immediate crisis distracts the United States from its core long-term strategic challenge: the economic and technological competition with China. While the U.S. gains some leverage in infrastructure, the article argues that Washington lacks a clear, predictable, and durable economic strategy to counter Beijing's methodical build-up of semiconductor and AI capacity. Policy must therefore prioritize developing a long-term economic competition framework that transcends crisis management and uses export controls with discipline to avoid accelerating Chinese indigenization.

    Read at CSIS

  288. 288.
    2026-05-04 | energy | 2026-W18 | Topics: Climate, Europe, Middle East, Trade, Energy

    The article argues that the UK's energy security challenge, exacerbated by global supply shocks, cannot be solved by increased fossil fuel extraction from the North Sea. Instead, the UK should model its strategy on Norway, which successfully decoupled its energy needs from fossil fuels by prioritizing electrification for heating and transport. This transition requires aggressive policy intervention—such as subsidies and infrastructure upgrades—to accelerate the adoption of heat pumps and electric vehicles. By rapidly shifting away from oil and gas dependency, the UK can significantly reduce its exposure to volatile international energy markets, thereby improving both resilience and environmental outcomes.

    Read at Chatham House

  289. 289.
    2026-05-04 | china_indopacific | 2026-W18 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States

    The analysis concludes that despite ongoing high-level purges, China's People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is undergoing a massive, deliberate, and highly successful modernization effort, making it a formidable military force. Key evidence points to the PLA's exponential growth in budget and capabilities—including missile, cyber, and maritime assets—and the purges themselves are viewed as Xi Jinping's serious effort to ensure the military's absolute loyalty to the Party and to him. Strategically, this indicates that China is building a force capable of presenting challenges to the U.S. military that have not been seen since World War II, necessitating a serious reassessment of US Indo-Pacific military policy.

    Read at Brookings

  290. 290.

    Emanuel argues that America's internal political divisions and systemic failures are its greatest strategic vulnerability, potentially overshadowing geopolitical challenges like China. Regarding the Middle East, he labels the current conflict with Iran a 'war of choice' and outlines a multi-phase strategy to stabilize the region. This plan involves immediately ensuring the free passage through the Strait of Hormuz, followed by establishing UN oversight and redefining the Abraham Accords. Ultimately, the U.S. must leverage these accords as a financing and infrastructure vehicle to bypass the Strait, thereby undermining Iran's regional leverage and securing long-term economic stability.

    Read at CFR

  291. 291.

    The Brookings report argues that deep energy system integration across the EU and with neighboring states is essential for navigating the energy trilemma—balancing security, affordability, and sustainability. This integration enhances security by allowing cross-border transfers to buffer supply shocks, while it boosts sustainability and affordability by optimizing the management of intermittent renewable sources like wind and solar. To realize these benefits, policymakers must undertake massive investments in cross-border infrastructure and, critically, address the political and social challenges of cost allocation and loss of local control. Ultimately, sustained political will is required to overcome these hurdles, transforming a more integrated energy system into a core driver of European growth and strategic autonomy.

    Read at Brookings

  292. 292.
    2026-05-04 | middle_east | 2026-W18 | Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The article analyzes the legal and strategic ambiguity of U.S. military involvement in Iran as the War Powers Act deadline approaches. Despite a current ceasefire, Pentagon officials are reviewing options for renewed strikes, signaling potential escalation in the Middle East. This heightened tension is reinforced by warnings from Iran's IRGC, which threatens severe retaliation against any new U.S. attacks. Strategically, the conflict is unlikely to achieve a quick resolution, suggesting instead a protracted, 'frozen conflict' characterized by cycles of renewed attacks and temporary de-escalations.

    Read at CFR

  293. 293.
    2026-05-04 | middle_east | 2026-W18 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Trump has rejected Iran's peace overtures and vowed to maintain the U.S. naval blockade, arguing that sustained pressure is necessary to force Tehran into a nuclear agreement. Experts concur that controlling the Strait of Hormuz is the primary strategic objective, as this leverage is essential to deter Iran's nuclear ambitions and stabilize the region. The continued blockade and potential military strikes are therefore viewed as the most critical policy tools to manage the conflict, despite the escalating financial and military costs. This suggests that the U.S. strategy remains focused on economic strangulation and military deterrence rather than immediate diplomatic resolution.

    Read at CFR

  294. 294.
    2026-05-04 | economy | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, Economy

    The global economy is increasingly characterized by structural chokepoints—including physical trade routes, financial systems, and regulatory bottlenecks—rather than being solely dictated by single geopolitical crises. These concentrated points of pressure, such as those affecting fertilizer flows or international finance, are becoming fundamental features of global commerce. Consequently, the strategic focus for policymakers and businesses must shift from merely acknowledging these bottlenecks to actively identifying the specific supply chain vulnerabilities they reveal. Managing exposure to these structural chokepoints will be the defining factor in determining future economic advantage.

    Read at CSIS

  295. 295.

    Global immunization efforts are facing significant setbacks due to a combination of conflict, declining public confidence, and weak health systems, threatening global health security. Evidence shows that the United States is experiencing measles outbreaks, while international support mechanisms like Gavi face funding uncertainty and political headwinds. For policy, the findings underscore the urgent need to reinforce both domestic public health messaging and stable international commitments to prevent outbreaks and maintain vaccine-preventable disease elimination status.

    Read at CSIS

  296. 296.
    2026-05-04 | middle_east | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    The publication argues that military pressure alone is insufficient to neutralize the Iranian regime's ideological grip, recommending instead that the West exploit the country's deep ethnic and political fractures. The reasoning centers on Iran's multi-ethnic composition—including the Kurds, Ahwazi Arabs, and Balochis—whose historical grievances and regional power bases can be leveraged. Policy implications suggest shifting from blanket sanctions to targeted diplomatic support for minority groups, thereby decentralizing power and forcing the regime to confront internal stability rather than external conflicts. This strategy aims to guide Iran toward a federated, post-clerical future.

    Read at CFR

  297. 297.
    2026-05-04 | middle_east | 2026-W18 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, United States

    The Chatham House analysis suggests that Israel's multi-front military campaign against Iran and Hezbollah is facing significant internal contradictions and political instability. Key evidence points to Prime Minister Netanyahu lacking political leverage and a stable coalition, while the national mood reflects strategic fatigue despite some opposition to a ceasefire. Consequently, the war's future trajectory and Israel's relationships with the US, Europe, and Gulf Arab states will be heavily dictated by domestic political dynamics and the upcoming electoral cycle, rather than solely by military necessity.

    Read at Chatham House

  298. 298.
    2026-05-04 | americas | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Americas

    The article argues that the recent 'Iran War' represents a 'post-deliberative' conflict, characterized by the near-total failure of Congress and the mainstream media to sustain robust public debate on the choice between war and peace. Key evidence cited is the lack of meaningful congressional deliberation or votes before the conflict, contrasting sharply with previous, albeit flawed, instances of military authorization. The implications are dire: this trend of congressional abdication and media passivity reinforces the 'imperial presidency,' necessitating sustained voter engagement and political pressure to restore constitutional oversight of executive military power.

    Read at CATO

  299. 299.
    2026-05-04 | society | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Society

    The Supreme Court's recent ruling significantly weakens the enforcement of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) by limiting the federal government's ability to mandate the creation of majority-minority districts. This legal shift provides states with greater latitude to redraw electoral maps, potentially diminishing the structural protections for minority voters and favoring Republican redistricting efforts. However, the analysis cautions that while the decision provides a structural advantage to Republicans, the ultimate electoral impact remains complex. The success of gerrymandering efforts could be undermined by broader political trends or voter dissatisfaction, suggesting that the 2026 midterm outcome is not as straightforward as the legal ruling suggests.

    Read at Brookings

  300. 300.
    2026-05-04 | diplomacy | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Diplomacy

    The Chatham House analysis details the complex legal history of the Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute, arguing that the UK's historical title and continuous display of state authority are legally robust. The article systematically challenges Argentina's claims, asserting that doctrines like *uti possidetis* and self-determination are inapplicable against the UK, especially since the UK was already the established power at the time of Argentina's independence. For policy, the findings underscore that the dispute is fundamentally a matter of international law and historical precedent, rather than a simple colonial issue. Therefore, any resolution requires sophisticated diplomatic engagement that navigates the principles of self-determination and intertemporal law, making military action legally tenuous.

    Read at Chatham House

  301. 301.
    2026-05-04 | middle_east | 2026-W18 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    Pakistan has undergone a significant geopolitical pivot, transforming from a pariah state into an indispensable mediator in major regional conflicts, notably facilitating talks between the US and Iran. This shift is driven by Pakistan's ability to deepen regional alliances (e.g., with Saudi Arabia and Turkey) and its strategic value as a resource hub (rare earths). Consequently, major global powers, including the US and Western democracies, are increasingly willing to overlook human rights concerns to leverage Islamabad's diplomatic contacts and geographic position. Policymakers should recognize Pakistan's growing role as a critical, albeit complex, node for future diplomatic and economic engagement across South Asia and the Middle East.

    Read at CFR

  302. 302.
    2026-05-04 | economy | 2026-W18 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States, Economy

    Amid global trade fragmentation driven by US protectionism and China's export controls, the EU is proactively adapting by pursuing a 'de-risking' strategy to secure its economic future. Key evidence includes the rapid negotiation of landmark bilateral agreements (e.g., Mercosur, India, Indonesia), which go beyond tariff reduction to establish rules on critical minerals, climate, and labor rights. Strategically, this signals that the EU is solidifying its role as a major global trade hub, leveraging preferential agreements to diversify supply chains and reduce dependence on external economic coercion. Policymakers should recognize that the EU's future strategy involves deepening its single market while using these strategic trade pacts to cement its influence in the new, multipolar trade order.

    Read at CSIS

  303. 303.
    2026-05-04 | defense | 2026-W18 | Topics: China, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Defense

    Türkiye is undergoing a profound strategic shift to achieve defense-industrial autonomy by building a sophisticated, multi-layered missile arsenal. This transformation is evidenced by a twin-track approach that combines limited foreign imports with aggressive domestic development of both ballistic and cruise missiles. Key advancements include extending missile ranges far beyond initial capabilities and enabling diverse, multi-platform strike options through domestic engine development. This rapid build-up significantly enhances Türkiye's strategic deterrent capabilities, reducing reliance on NATO guarantees and projecting power across wider regional areas.

    Read at IISS

  304. 304.
    2026-05-04 | africa | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, Africa

    The recent coordinated attacks in Mali demonstrate that security cannot be achieved through military means alone, exposing the deep fragility of the ruling junta and its external alliances. The strikes by jihadist and Tuareg militants highlighted the limits of military support, including the withdrawal of Russian mercenaries, while simultaneously revealing profound, unresolved ethnic and political grievances. Consequently, the article argues that purely military solutions are unviable; sustainable stabilization requires a strategic pivot toward comprehensive political negotiation, local-level mediation, and addressing underlying community tensions.

    Read at Chatham House

  305. 305.
    2026-05-04 | economy | 2026-W18 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Economy

    The article argues that the U.S. economy is facing a severe downturn, risking stagflation, driven by a confluence of global and domestic shocks. The primary catalyst is the Iran conflict and the resulting disruption of the Strait of Hormuz, which has created a major global supply shock, spiking energy and agricultural input costs. These external pressures, combined with domestic vulnerabilities like tech layoffs, private credit risks, and tariff uncertainty, are fueling inflation and slowing growth. Policymakers must urgently address supply chain resilience and energy security, as the resulting economic instability is poised to become a critical political issue during the upcoming midterm elections, complicating the Federal Reserve's dual mandate.

    Read at CFR

  306. 306.
    2026-05-04 | energy | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Energy

    The UAE's decision to withdraw from OPEC is a significant geopolitical move, driven primarily by the deterioration of its bilateral relationship with Saudi Arabia and the belief that the cartel's decision-making historically favors Riyadh over Abu Dhabi's economic interests. While the move is not an immediate threat to OPEC's global oil flows, it serves as a powerful symbolic blow to the cartel's cohesion and stability. Strategically, the departure signals a growing trend among Gulf states to assert economic autonomy and resist regional dominance. If the UAE can demonstrate that leaving the cartel is economically beneficial, it could prompt other members to reconsider their participation.

    Read at CFR

  307. 307.
    2026-05-04 | middle_east | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, Trade

    The ongoing instability stemming from the Iran conflict and the vulnerability of the Strait of Hormuz are forcing Saudi Arabia to fundamentally reassess its long-term economic strategy. Recognizing the existential threat posed by potential chokepoint closures, the Kingdom is pivoting its economic geography and infrastructure development away from the Gulf and toward the Red Sea. This strategic shift aims to reduce dependence on Hormuz and establish Saudi Arabia as a major regional logistics hub. However, this westward reorientation introduces new maritime security risks from the Houthis, making regional stability and infrastructure investment critical to the success of Vision 2030.

    Read at Chatham House

  308. 308.
    2026-05-01 | china_indopacific | 2026-W18 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, United States

    The article argues that the rapidly expanding nuclear capabilities of China, coupled with its refusal to engage in arms control talks, are replacing the bipolar nuclear order with a destabilizing tripolar dynamic. Beijing views a strong deterrent as stabilizing, while the U.S. responds by strengthening its own forces and avoiding treaties that exclude China. This escalating arms race, further complicated by Russia's involvement, is creating an anarchic international security environment. To de-escalate, both powers must move beyond rhetoric and increase concrete transparency, particularly regarding short-range nuclear capabilities, to defuse acute regional risks.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  309. 309.
    2026-05-01 | middle_east | 2026-W18 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    The article argues that continued maximalist diplomacy has failed, necessitating a comprehensive 'golden bridge' of compromise for lasting U.S.-Iran peace. This framework requires the U.S. to acknowledge Iran's right to peaceful nuclear development while Iran agrees to strict international oversight. Key to the deal is establishing a regional fund, financed by surcharges on goods transiting the Strait of Hormuz, which would finance reconstruction efforts across the Gulf. Implementing this compromise would stabilize the region, normalize relations, and provide a viable alternative to escalating military conflict.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  310. 310.
    2026-05-01 | energy | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States, Energy

    The article argues that Libya's current stability is a 'false peace,' maintained by transactional financial deals between rival ruling elites rather than genuine political unification. Key evidence shows that both factions continue to siphon state resources, particularly oil wealth, for personal gain, leading to profound fiscal crises and institutional weakness. For effective stabilization, the US must abandon focusing on elite bargains and instead adopt a broader strategy: bolstering the independence of financial institutions (like the Central Bank and NOC), enforcing transparency through audits, and supporting the groundwork for national elections.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  311. 311.
    2026-05-01 | energy | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States, Energy

    Commercial transits through the Strait of Hormuz have dropped to historic lows, indicating severe disruption to global energy supply chains. This decline is driven by the ongoing geopolitical conflict between the U.S. and Iran, which has resulted in a partial blockade and increased reliance on the 'shadow fleet.' The low transits, coupled with high oil prices and the potential for prolonged blockades, suggest that the region's maritime stability is critically compromised. Policymakers must recognize the extreme vulnerability of global energy markets to localized conflict, necessitating contingency planning for alternative shipping routes and enhanced diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions.

    Read at USNI

  312. 312.
    2026-04-30 | defense | 2026-W18 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, United States, Defense

    The article argues that decades of U.S. policy aimed at denuclearizing North Korea have failed, allowing the regime to successfully accelerate its nuclear program and solidify its rule. North Korea has skillfully leveraged shifting geopolitics, bolstering ties with China and Russia, which has rendered previous containment strategies obsolete. Consequently, the U.S. must abandon the goal of complete denuclearization and instead craft a new, pragmatic strategy focused on 'managing' the threat to achieve a stable, albeit cold, peace on the Korean Peninsula.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  313. 313.
    2026-04-30 | china_indopacific | 2026-W18 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The transition to critical minerals (lithium, cobalt, rare earths) presents a 'new resource curse' far more volatile than the historical oil curse. This risk is amplified by the rapid technological shifts, the geographical concentration of deposits, and the fact that China currently dominates the processing and refining stages for most critical minerals. Unlike the stable, rules-bound oil market, the current geopolitical environment lacks a reliable global governance framework, making supply chains highly susceptible to state-level geopolitical throttling. Policymakers must therefore prepare for unprecedented structural instability, necessitating strategic efforts to diversify supply chains and mitigate risks associated with technological and geopolitical competition.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  314. 314.
    2026-04-29 | china_indopacific | 2026-W18 | Topics: AI, China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The primary threat to Taiwan is not a traditional military invasion, but rather a sophisticated 'gray zone' coercion utilizing economic and logistical control, such as establishing a quarantine over maritime and air links. China is leveraging this control to restrict key exports, particularly advanced semiconductor components, thereby forcing regional compliance without triggering a full-scale conflict. Consequently, the U.S. must shift its strategic focus from preparing for military war games to developing integrated economic and diplomatic plans with allies. Deterring a severe financial and political crisis requires pre-coordinated responses to cushion market shocks and manage potential partial decoupling from China.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  315. 315.
    2026-04-29 | middle_east | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    The article argues that external military pressure, such as the U.S.-Israeli war, intended to topple the Iranian regime has paradoxically strengthened it by allowing hard-line elements to consolidate power. Instead of collapsing due to internal economic and political discontent, the regime leveraged the crisis to centralize authority, empowering the IRGC and adopting a more aggressive, militarized posture. Policymakers should abandon the assumption that Iran is a brittle, leader-centric state susceptible to rapid collapse. Continued intervention risks hardening the regime's resolve, increasing its nuclear capabilities, and making it less predictable and more dangerous to regional stability.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  316. 316.
    2026-04-29 | defense | 2026-W18 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States, Defense

    The Marine Corps is adapting its deployment strategy for SOUTHCOM due to a shortage of traditional amphibious ready groups (ARGs), necessitating the use of alternative, modular platforms. Key evidence includes the planned utilization of specialized vessels like Expeditionary Sea Bases (ESBs) and Spearhead-class Expeditionary Fast Transports (EPFs), alongside a systemic reassessment of the force generation model, which is being extended from a 36-month to a 56-month cycle. Strategically, this signals a shift toward prioritizing flexible, distributed force projection capabilities over large, traditional task forces, allowing the U.S. military to maintain mission readiness in contested areas with fewer assets.

    Read at USNI

  317. 317.
    2026-04-28 | middle_east | 2026-W18 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article analyzes the shifting U.S. policy rhetoric regarding Iran, noting a pivot away from explicit calls for regime change. Key evidence cited includes statements from high-ranking officials (Trump, Hegseth, Vance) who initially suggested encouraging internal revolt but later downplayed the goal of overthrowing the government. This suggests that future U.S. strategy may favor limited, targeted military or economic pressure rather than large-scale, destabilizing interventions aimed at regime collapse. Policymakers should anticipate a focus on achieving strategic objectives without committing to the high risks associated with promoting internal revolution.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  318. 318.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W18 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    While Turkey seeks to maintain neutrality during the Iran conflict to prevent regional chaos and protect its borders, the article argues that this passive stance is insufficient to ensure its security. Turkey's geopolitical vulnerability is highlighted by external pressures, particularly Israel's expanding regional dominance, which risks encircling Ankara. Therefore, Turkey must move beyond mere non-involvement and adopt a proactive diplomatic strategy. Its primary goal should be to negotiate a durable, constrained settlement for Iran—similar to the JCPOA—that limits its nuclear and missile programs without causing state collapse, thereby stabilizing the region and preserving Turkey's strategic influence.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  319. 319.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The analysis concludes that while an indefinite ceasefire has temporarily paused hostilities, a lasting resolution to the Iran conflict is highly improbable due to fundamental, irreconcilable differences between the US and the Iranian regime. Key sticking points include the Iranian control over the vital Strait of Hormuz and the regime's insistence on its nuclear enrichment capabilities, which the US demands be curtailed by a lengthy moratorium. Consequently, the conflict remains strategically volatile; if diplomatic negotiations fail to bridge these deep divides, the region is likely to revert to an active military phase, maintaining significant geopolitical risk.

    Read at Brookings

  320. 320.
    2026-04-27 | diplomacy | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Diplomacy

    The UN humanitarian system is facing unprecedented strain due to multiplying global conflicts and insufficient funding, leading to a gap between humanitarian need and operational capacity. The core challenge is the declining political will of major powers to sustain the multilateral order, putting the UN's reform agenda under intense pressure. To address this, the analysis argues that effective global leadership requires a significant overhaul of the UN system and a renewed commitment to donor roles. Specifically, nations must redefine their contributions to international aid and governance, even if they have reduced their own national spending, to ensure a coherent global response.

    Read at Chatham House

  321. 321.
    2026-04-27 | diplomacy | 2026-W17 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Diplomacy

    The conflict in Sudan is entrenched, with military efforts by the SAF and RSF showing no sign of resolution, while regional competition further complicates diplomatic efforts. Despite various international initiatives (Quad, Quintet), progress is hampered by a lack of coordination and the focus on military gains rather than civilian needs. The analysis argues that the only viable path forward is establishing a credible, inclusive, and civilian-led political process. Therefore, international policy must shift away from military intervention and instead focus on coordinating all mediating bodies under a single umbrella to support a non-aligned political transition.

    Read at Chatham House

  322. 322.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The podcast analyzes the complex intersection of geopolitical flashpoints, US domestic politics, and global economic stability. Key discussions center on the volatile situation in Iran, potential Strait of Hormuz blockades, and the broader health of the global economy, framed against the backdrop of US midterm election preparations. The panel argues that the US faces the challenge of managing multiple, simultaneous crises—ranging from regional conflicts to economic downturns—which complicates strategic decision-making. Policy implications suggest that the US must balance aggressive diplomatic engagement in the Middle East with managing internal political divisions and global financial pressures.

    Read at Chatham House

  323. 323.

    The U.S. military's future focus in the Western Hemisphere is shifting from great power competition to combating transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), drug trafficking, and narco-terrorism. This pivot is evidenced by recent threat assessments that prioritize illicit border actors over state rivals, leading to increased joint military operations and intelligence sharing with regional allies. Strategically, the U.S. will continue to deepen military cooperation through joint training and counter-cartel campaigns. However, the article cautions that sustained success requires coupling these security efforts with broader diplomatic and economic initiatives to address local concerns regarding sovereignty and human rights.

    Read at CSIS

  324. 324.
    2026-04-27 | defense | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States, Defense

    Geopolitical prediction markets pose a critical national security threat by creating a financial incentive for military and intelligence insiders to trade on classified information. The indictment of a U.S. soldier who allegedly bet on the capture of Nicolás Maduro serves as key evidence of this vulnerability, demonstrating how easily classified intelligence can be monetized. The authors argue that the current regulatory environment is dangerously lax, particularly regarding offshore platforms. To mitigate this risk, policy must mandate rigorous domestic enforcement, implement pre-emptive government vetting of market listings, and launch a coordinated global effort to close regulatory loopholes and harmonize international standards.

    Read at CFR

  325. 325.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Middle East, NATO, Russia, United States

    The Iran War has exposed a critical gap between U.S. analytical foresight and actual policy execution, forcing a reassessment of foundational assumptions. Key evidence demonstrates that Iran has invalidated previous assumptions by broadening its attacks across all Gulf nations and gaining significant economic leverage through its control of the Strait of Hormuz. While the regime's resilience to decapitation remains accurate, the conflict shows Iran is abandoning plausible deniability for more overt, direct attacks. Consequently, U.S. policy must urgently update its strategic framework to account for Iran's increased regional aggression and its sustained ability to maintain power despite external pressure.

    Read at CFR

  326. 326.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The analysis suggests that U.S. policy toward Iran must move beyond purely military options, advocating instead for a calibrated, multi-domain strategy. Key reasoning emphasizes that direct confrontation carries prohibitive economic costs and risks regional destabilization, necessitating a focus on internal Iranian dynamics and regional allies. Therefore, the optimal strategy involves coupling sustained diplomatic pressure and targeted sanctions with limited, credible military deterrence to manage escalation while undermining Iran's regional influence.

    Read at CFR

  327. 327.

    The analysis argues that while U.S. sanctions are powerful tools for geopolitical leverage, they inevitably generate unintended loopholes, exemplified by the 'shadow fleet.' Enforcement strategies must be highly tailored, ranging from the banking-focused 'carrot and stick' model used against Iran, to the price-cap mechanism implemented against Russia. This shift demonstrates that modern sanctions must balance punitive goals with the critical need to maintain global energy market stability. Policymakers must therefore design sophisticated regimes that prevent market shocks while achieving strategic objectives.

    Read at CFR

  328. 328.
    2026-04-27 | energy | 2026-W17 | Topics: Climate, Middle East, Energy

    This briefing examines the historical and geopolitical significance of the Gulf region's dominance in global oil and gas supplies. The analysis argues that the region's wealth and influence have been intrinsically tied to fossil fuel exports, making it a critical flashpoint for global energy security, particularly amid current tensions like those around the Strait of Hormuz. While Part 1 establishes this historical dependency, the series warns that the future stability of the Gulf is threatened by two major forces: escalating regional conflicts and the irreversible global energy transition. Policymakers must therefore consider how Gulf producers will manage this dual challenge to maintain their geopolitical influence and ensure global energy stability.

    Read at Chatham House

  329. 329.
    2026-04-27 | europe | 2026-W17 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, United States

    The podcast examines whether the geopolitical shockwaves from the US-Iran conflict are forcing Europe toward greater unity or deeper fragmentation. Key evidence suggests that renewed global instability is pressuring European nations to fundamentally reconsider their economic priorities and security architecture. The discussion highlights Europe's challenge in navigating an increasingly unpredictable United States while simultaneously managing its complex relationship with Russia. Ultimately, the analysis questions whether this crisis represents a moment of internal division or the necessary catalyst for developing a more coherent and unified European geopolitical stance.

    Read at Chatham House

  330. 330.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Regional stability remains precarious, characterized by ongoing diplomatic efforts between Israel and Lebanon set against a backdrop of a stalled U.S.-Iran negotiation. The U.S. faces a strategic dilemma: how to translate military pressure into political concessions without risking a massive, costly escalation, as evidenced by heightened rhetoric near the Strait of Hormuz. This impasse keeps regional actors volatile, while the U.S. military continues to absorb significant losses. Policy implications suggest that major powers are currently constrained from decisive action, leading to continued high-stakes tension and limited diplomatic breakthroughs.

    Read at CFR

  331. 331.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    The article argues that the U.S. naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is a high-risk gamble unlikely to succeed in coercing Iran into accepting U.S. terms. While the blockade aims to trigger an economic collapse, the analysis notes that Iran has demonstrated resilience, and the global energy market remains highly vulnerable to escalation. Furthermore, the U.S. faces significant domestic political backlash and the risk of a direct military confrontation with Iran or China. Consequently, the authors suggest that the potential for catastrophic global economic fallout outweighs the strategic benefits, making the current policy unsustainable.

    Read at CFR

  332. 332.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The Brookings article argues that any temporary nuclear deal with Iran is fundamentally flawed and dangerous. The core reasoning is that such agreements imply that the Iranian regime's moderation is predictable, which is an unreliable hope, and they undermine the permanent, global nature of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Furthermore, temporary limits send dangerous signals to both Iranian hardliners and regional rivals, suggesting that a nuclear option is permissible. Policy should therefore reject time-bound limitations, focusing instead on establishing permanent compliance mechanisms and robust international monitoring to manage the nuclear program.

    Read at Brookings

  333. 333.
    2026-04-27 | energy | 2026-W17 | Topics: Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Energy

    The energy crisis stemming from the Strait of Hormuz demonstrates the profound vulnerability of relying on volatile fossil fuel imports. The analysis argues that the EU's existing carbon pricing mechanism, the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), is the essential long-term solution, as it has proven effective in driving decarbonization and reducing emissions while generating revenue for clean energy investments. Policymakers must therefore strengthen the ETS and prioritize coordinated joint procurement of resources to mitigate geopolitical shocks. Ad-hoc national subsidies, conversely, risk undermining the 'polluter pays principle' and fragmenting the European market.

    Read at Chatham House

  334. 334.

    The article argues that Section 702 is an indispensable intelligence asset, crucial for thwarting modern threats including terrorism, cybercrime, and foreign espionage. Its effectiveness is evidenced by its proven ability to provide actionable intelligence on state and non-state actors, despite ongoing privacy concerns regarding U.S. persons' data. The report counters critics by highlighting the extraordinary oversight reforms already implemented, such as mandatory internal audits and national security nexus requirements. Therefore, the policy recommendation is a straightforward reauthorization of the program as is, avoiding restrictive changes like mandatory warrants that could severely hamper national security capabilities.

    Read at CSIS

  335. 335.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    Chatham House warns that Israel is accelerating a de facto annexation of the West Bank, a process that severely undermines the possibility of a viable Palestinian state. Key evidence includes far-right policies driving massive settlement expansion and the establishment of Israeli governance over occupied areas, such as the controversial process of registering West Bank land as state property. The report argues that this unilateral action is dangerous, jeopardizing regional stability and the prospects for peace. For policy, the authors recommend that the US and regional powers (including the UAE and Saudi Arabia) must coordinate to condition political and military support on Israel reversing these annexation measures to prevent further conflict.

    Read at Chatham House

  336. 336.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The conflict with Iran demonstrated that US forward military bases are highly vulnerable to sustained attacks, regardless of the US's conventional military overmatch. Iran leveraged its proximity and ability to launch missiles and drones against multiple US bases across the region, forcing the Pentagon to consider remote operations. This vulnerability necessitates a strategic reevaluation of the operational value of large, forward-deployed bases, raising questions about their utility in modern conflict and potentially impacting basing strategies across both the Middle East and the Indo-Pacific.

    Read at CATO

  337. 337.
    2026-04-27 | diplomacy | 2026-W17 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Diplomacy

    The Chatham House analysis argues that while the Indus Waters Treaty is currently strained by geopolitical tensions and climate change, re-engaging on shared water resources is critical for achieving lasting peace between India and Pakistan. The treaty's stability is threatened by rapid glacial retreat, mounting water demand, and the politicization of resource management. Drawing lessons from global water governance successes, the report advises that international actors must elevate water management from a technical issue to a core pillar of diplomacy, providing technical assistance to stabilize the region and build confidence.

    Read at Chatham House

  338. 338.
    2026-04-27 | americas | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Americas

    The unusually high number of House members announcing retirement signals deep institutional frustration with Congress, suggesting the decline of federal service's appeal beyond mere midterm election anxiety. Key evidence includes 56 retirements, predominantly from Republicans, who cite factors like gridlock and a "toxic partisan atmosphere" as reasons for leaving. Furthermore, many retirees are bypassing traditional federal paths to seek state or local offices, indicating a shift in legislative focus. Strategically, this suggests a potential period of institutional instability and a significant influx of new, potentially less experienced members into Congress next year.

    Read at Brookings

  339. 339.
    2026-04-27 | americas | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Americas

    The core argument presented is that the United States is currently experiencing a state of "superpower suicide," a decline that is largely self-inflicted rather than purely structural. This systemic weakening is evidenced by the erosion of institutional integrity across multiple domains, including education, research, and adherence to democratic norms. The analysis stresses that the fundamental problem is the loss of a unified ideology of the American state, which is being treated by some actors as merely a prestige or profit-making enterprise. For the US to reverse this decline, policy must focus on restoring institutional stability, reaffirming democratic processes, and establishing a shared, unifying vision of the American state.

    Read at CFR

  340. 340.
    2026-04-27 | economy | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Economy

    The article argues that the 'greedflation' narrative—which blames corporate price gouging for inflation—is economically unsound. It posits that recent price spikes, such as those in energy, are primarily the result of supply shocks (e.g., geopolitical conflicts like the war in Iran) or excessive monetary and fiscal stimulus. The author contends that market prices reflect true scarcity and opportunity cost, making corporate greed an insufficient explanation for widespread price increases. Policymakers, therefore, must shift accountability away from consumers and companies and instead hold governments and central banks responsible for the policies that generate inflationary pressures.

    Read at CATO

  341. 341.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Trade, United States

    Pakistan's emergence as a mediator between the US and Iran is less about regional diplomacy and more about structural necessity and strategic gain. The nation's near-bankrupt economy and heavy reliance on energy imports compel Islamabad to leverage its mediation role to secure international bailouts. Key to this strategy is the close personal rapport between the US administration and the powerful military establishment, which Pakistan is using to attract massive US investment in critical minerals, cryptocurrency, and counter-terrorism cooperation. Consequently, Pakistan's mediation efforts are highly transactional, aiming to stabilize its economy and bolster its military-industrial complex rather than purely achieving regional peace.

    Read at Chatham House

  342. 342.
    2026-04-27 | europe | 2026-W17 | Topics: Climate, Europe, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The article traces the development of a foreign policy career, arguing that professional interest is profoundly shaped by major geopolitical shifts, such as the end of the Cold War and the expansion of the European Union. Key evidence highlights that exposure to large-scale global events (like the Gulf War and EU enlargement) and the necessity of pivoting from pure academia to policy-oriented work are crucial for developing expertise. For policy and strategy, the implication is that effective analysis requires bridging the gap between theoretical models and practical reality, emphasizing the need to understand the operational decision-making processes of policymakers and the private sector.

    Read at CFR

  343. 343.

    The expiration of the U.S.-Iran truce is marked by significant diplomatic uncertainty, despite preparations for potential talks in Pakistan. Key evidence suggests that negotiations are complicated by internal divisions within Iran's leadership and the volatile actions of regional powers, including Israel and the U.S. The core finding is that while the logic for peace exists, the lack of unified, compromising leadership across the region makes achieving a stable diplomatic resolution highly improbable. Consequently, the geopolitical environment remains fragile, increasing the risk of continued tension or conflict.

    Read at CFR

  344. 344.
    2026-04-27 | china_indopacific | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Indo-Pacific

    North Korea's regime stability is maintained through a complex blend of authoritarian internal control, dynastic ideology, and strategic geopolitical alignment. The Kim dynasty has successfully leveraged this model across generations by deepening ties with major external powers, including Russia, China, and Iran, to navigate a shifting global order. Analysis of the regime's evolving ideology and domestic policy drivers is critical for understanding its current trajectory. Ultimately, tracking these internal and external pressures is key to predicting regional instability and the challenges associated with potential future leadership transitions.

    Read at Brookings

  345. 345.
    2026-04-27 | china_indopacific | 2026-W17 | Topics: AI, China, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Indo-Pacific

    Taiwan's progress in building defense resilience and leveraging its status as a tech superpower is being undermined by deep political polarization. While the island has enhanced its military readiness and economic ties with the U.S., the inability to pass a special defense budget due to internal political disputes creates a critical vulnerability. This impasse allows China to exert pressure, making it difficult for Taiwan to maintain deterrence and invest in necessary defense capabilities. Strategically, Taiwan must prioritize internal political consensus to fund its defense and resilience efforts, thereby eliminating coercion as a viable option for Beijing and forcing dialogue.

    Read at CFR

  346. 346.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    Despite the failure of recent U.S.-Iran ceasefire talks, the analysis suggests that the mutual reluctance of both sides to resume open conflict indicates a strong underlying desire for peace. The U.S. response—imposing a naval blockade on the Strait of Hormuz—is intended to create significant economic and diplomatic pain, forcing Tehran to concede to American terms. However, the effectiveness of this coercion is questionable, as such campaigns take time to materialize. Strategically, the situation remains volatile, suggesting that while high-level diplomacy is ongoing, the potential for renewed hostilities persists.

    Read at CFR

  347. 347.
    2026-04-27 | economy | 2026-W17 | Topics: Climate, Middle East, United States, Economy

    The Brookings report argues that climate action's appeal to everyday Americans has flatlined because advocates have failed to connect the issue with the immediate economic concerns of the working and middle classes. To rebuild political consensus, policymakers must reframe climate action away from an 'elitist concern' and position it instead as a powerful solution for increasing affordability and economic mobility. The analysis suggests that current policies often focus too much on private benefits, missing the opportunity to address tangible, localized needs. Therefore, the strategy must involve scaling up community-level programs—such as low-income retrofitting or flood mitigation—that provide clear, immediate benefits (e.g., reduced utility bills or insurance premiums) across all economic and geographic spectra.

    Read at Brookings

  348. 348.
    2026-04-27 | europe | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, United States, Europe

    Lord Robertson argues that the UK's historical 'naïve belief' in the perpetual support of the United States has led to a dangerous diminishment of its own defense capabilities. He cites recent strains in the UK-US relationship, such as geopolitical disagreements and the US's shifting focus, as evidence that the US's role as global steward is waning. Consequently, the report urges the UK to pivot away from high military dependence on Washington, emphasizing the urgent need to build greater autonomy and develop robust defense partnerships with European allies. This shift is necessary to deter aggression and adapt to a fundamentally destabilizing international system.

    Read at Chatham House

  349. 349.
    2026-04-27 | diplomacy | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States, Diplomacy

    Rafael Grossi argues that the UN requires a proactive, 'realist' leader to revitalize its mission and restore global trust amid mounting crises. He draws on his experience at the IAEA, citing his ability to manage complex, high-stakes negotiations in conflict zones, such as preventing a nuclear accident in occupied Ukraine. His strategy emphasizes taking the initiative to forestall conflict and maintaining constant engagement with the Security Council, even when consensus is difficult. Ultimately, Grossi suggests that by exercising diplomatic authority and restoring trust among major powers, the UN can overcome its funding and institutional challenges.

    Read at CFR

  350. 350.
    2026-04-27 | energy | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Middle East, Energy

    The Chatham House analysis emphasizes that international law, specifically the UNCLOS regime of 'transit passage,' guarantees unimpeded passage through the Strait of Hormuz, overriding local coastal state sovereignty. The article critiques unilateral blockades, such as the proposed US action, as illegal and highly escalatory, noting that the Strait is vital for global energy trade. Given its critical role in maritime commerce, adherence to established international law is paramount; any conflict escalation must respect the right of passage to prevent catastrophic global economic disruption.

    Read at Chatham House

  351. 351.
    2026-04-27 | energy | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States, Energy

    The analysis argues that during major supply disruptions, the physical oil market (real barrels) is a more reliable indicator of true supply-demand imbalances than the financial 'paper' futures market. The current crisis is characterized as a 1970s-style supply shock, causing physical prices to diverge sharply from futures prices, which are masking the true scarcity. Policymakers must recognize that high physical prices reflect acute supply constraints, and relying on moderate futures prices can send false signals of market stability. Furthermore, broad government price interventions risk creating a moral hazard, potentially hindering necessary behavioral changes and slowing the energy recovery.

    Read at CSIS

  352. 352.
    2026-04-27 | americas | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Ukraine, United States, Americas

    The attempted shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner underscores the persistent threat of political violence against democratic institutions. Global leaders and domestic politicians from various parties issued strong condemnations, providing evidence that the threat is systemic and bipartisan. Policy-wise, the consensus among leaders suggests that a unified political front is crucial to counter the erosion of civil liberties and maintain democratic stability in the Americas.

    Read at CFR

  353. 353.
    2026-04-27 | energy | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States, Energy

    Alberta's substantial role as Canada's primary energy producer grants the province significant leverage in shaping the nation's foreign and energy policy. The conversation highlights that global energy instability, particularly the Middle East conflict, is increasing international interest in North American supply and elevating the importance of Canada's export choices. Premier Smith's vision suggests that Alberta's priorities—rooted in deep US market integration and energy exports—will heavily influence Canada's strategy regarding economic sovereignty and alliance recalibration. Ultimately, the successful integration of Alberta's economic agenda into the federal foreign policy remains an open question regarding national consensus.

    Read at Chatham House

  354. 354.
    2026-04-27 | diplomacy | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Climate, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Diplomacy

    The article argues that the deliberate weaponization of food—through blocking aid or targeting infrastructure—is a growing, global trend that operates with near impunity, despite international legal prohibitions. This crisis is exacerbated by the decline of global humanitarian funding and systemic failures within international governance, particularly the political deadlock and veto power within the UN Security Council. Strategically, the report calls for a shift toward strengthening accountability mechanisms, including targeted sanctions and independent monitoring, while also advocating for the diversification of aid funding away from traditional state-led models.

    Read at CFR

  355. 355.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    The three-week extension of the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire is a diplomatic effort intended to create stability and buy time for comprehensive peace negotiations. This pause is strategically vital because the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah has previously served as a major obstacle to broader U.S.-Iran diplomatic efforts. While the truce provides immediate de-escalation, the skepticism expressed by Iran-backed groups suggests that core geopolitical tensions remain unresolved. Policymakers must therefore leverage this window to solidify a comprehensive peace framework that addresses regional power dynamics and de-escalates the wider conflict with Tehran.

    Read at CFR

  356. 356.
    2026-04-27 | china_indopacific | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Taiwan, Trade

    The Chatham House analysis argues that a crisis over Taiwan poses a far greater global economic threat than a disruption in the Strait of Hormuz. This risk stems from Taiwan's pivotal role as the world's leading producer of advanced semiconductors, which are critical, non-substitutable components for modern AI and electronics. A blockade or conflict could trigger a catastrophic global GDP decline, necessitating urgent policy action. To mitigate this, Europe must accelerate the diversification of semiconductor supply chains, deepen intelligence and technical cooperation with Taiwan, and actively communicate the severe global costs of escalation to Beijing.

    Read at Chatham House

  357. 357.

    The report identifies a critical "missing middle" gap, estimated at $100-$200 billion, where emerging energy technologies struggle to transition from small-scale proof-of-concept to commercial deployment due to perceived investment risk. This gap is exacerbated by global economic shifts, such as inflation and rising interest rates, which make large-scale, high-risk capital difficult to secure. To bridge this, the authors argue that relying solely on private investment is insufficient, necessitating a multi-faceted approach. Policy solutions must combine public demand guarantees (federal and state level) with private risk-transfer mechanisms, such as new insurance models, to de-risk projects and stimulate diverse capital flows. The successful scaling of energy innovation requires a combination of policy support and private sector action, rather than any single solution.

    Read at CFR

  358. 358.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East

    The recent US-hosted talks between Lebanon and Israel are viewed as a crucial, albeit challenging, confidence-building measure that reasserts Lebanese state sovereignty. While the core hurdle remains Hezbollah's refusal to disarm, the talks are politically viable because neither Hezbollah nor Iran could prevent the meeting. For future negotiations to succeed, the analysis suggests that Israel must curb strikes on civilian infrastructure, while the Lebanese government must take concrete steps—including politically and financially isolating Hezbollah—to diminish its military and political power.

    Read at Chatham House

  359. 359.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The indefinite ceasefire extension has resulted in a protracted stalemate, as both the US and Iran maintain maximalist demands, with Iran continuing to weaponize the Strait of Hormuz. While Iran's military capabilities are degraded, the ongoing tension forces Gulf states to pivot their development investments toward robust defense capabilities. Strategically, the US faces resource limitations that preclude a long-term, indefinite blockade, suggesting that the conflict will persist as a source of chronic regional instability. Therefore, future policy must focus on balancing limited military resources with the necessity of maintaining pressure on Iran's economic and geopolitical leverage points.

    Read at CFR

  360. 360.
    2026-04-27 | energy | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States, Energy

    The article posits that an "open for open" deal—where the US and Iran mutually lift their blockades of the Strait of Hormuz—is the most immediate way to break the current diplomatic stalemate. This proposal is driven by mutual economic necessity, as both nations suffer significant damage from the resulting disruption to global oil and gas flow. Implementing this formula would stabilize global energy markets, providing crucial time and confidence for the two sides to engage in the complex, long-term negotiations required to address Iran's nuclear program and regional tensions.

    Read at CFR

  361. 361.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Tensions between Iran and the U.S. remain critically high, despite temporary ceasefires, fueled by recent escalations in the Strait of Hormuz. Key evidence includes the U.S. seizure of Iranian cargo vessels and reciprocal drone attacks by Iran in the Gulf of Oman, while diplomatic efforts are stalled by Iran's rejection of proposals regarding its enriched uranium stockpile. The primary implication is that regional stability and global energy flow are highly vulnerable; the true economic impact hinges on the duration of the ceasefire and the success of sustained diplomatic efforts to normalize maritime traffic.

    Read at CFR

  362. 362.
    2026-04-27 | economy | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, Economy

    While US assets demonstrated relative resilience and maintained their safe-haven status during the Iran conflict, the Chatham House analysis cautions that this stability may be conjunctural rather than structural. The good performance of the dollar and US markets may simply reflect the US's current economic insulation, particularly its status as a major energy and weapons producer. Policymakers should note that this reliance on US strength is challenged by the remarkable stability of rival economies, such as China, whose financial calm suggests that global currency dominance is subject to multiple, non-US-centric factors.

    Read at Chatham House

  363. 363.
    2026-04-27 | diplomacy | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Trade, Diplomacy

    The global order is undergoing rapid transformation, driven by the shifting strategies of the US and China, which creates significant uncertainty regarding established international norms and institutions. This instability presents a critical opportunity for non-aligned nations, particularly the Global South, to actively shape the rules of the emerging world order. Policymakers must navigate the tension between preserving existing structures (like the WTO and UN) and establishing new governance frameworks for challenges such as climate change and AI. Strategic focus must therefore shift toward multilateral diplomacy that empowers diverse regional actors to mediate between great power competition and ensure global stability.

    Read at Chatham House

  364. 364.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    The recent U.S.-Iran peace talks failed due to irreconcilable red lines, particularly concerning Iran's nuclear program and the status of the Strait of Hormuz. The subsequent U.S. blockade, intended to exert economic pressure, is proving ineffective and creates significant global diplomatic and economic instability. The analysis suggests that the current strategy of military pressure or blockades is unlikely to force Iran's hand and risks escalating into a broader conflict. Consequently, the U.S. must pivot away from simple punitive measures and re-examine its diplomatic options to manage the crisis without triggering a wider war.

    Read at CFR

  365. 365.
    2026-04-27 | energy | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, Trade, United States, Energy

    The article argues that geopolitical instability, such as the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz, accelerates the global shift toward clean energy, positioning China as the dominant leader in the new 'electrostate' model. China's advantage stems from its comprehensive control over the 'new trio' (solar, batteries, EVs) and critical manufacturing infrastructure, including rare-earth elements and electrical grid hardware. This deepens China's global economic leverage, challenging the traditional 'petrostate' model. For the United States, the implication is that it must urgently pivot its strategy away from resource dependence and compete effectively in the 'Age of Electricity' to mitigate China's growing geopolitical influence.

    Read at CFR

  366. 366.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, United States

    Trump's extension of the U.S.-Iran truce temporarily alleviates immediate fears of large-scale conflict and stabilized oil markets. However, the truce is fragile, as both Washington and Tehran continue to violate the ceasefire and maintain blockades in the Strait of Hormuz. Strategically, the focus must shift from military confrontation to resolving the critical economic choke point, as mutual opening of the Strait is identified as the most crucial confidence-boosting step. Policymakers must therefore pursue de-escalation efforts while managing persistent regional flashpoints, including tensions in Lebanon and Iraq.

    Read at CFR

  367. 367.
    2026-04-27 | europe | 2026-W17 | Topics: Europe, Middle East

    The paper identifies that Europe's civil defense architecture is highly fragmented, creating a significant gap between nations with robust, whole-of-society systems and those that remain critically exposed. The core finding is that the modern threat environment, where the distinction between war and peace is increasingly blurred, demands a systemic overhaul of preparedness. Therefore, closing this defensive gap requires more than increased state spending; it necessitates a fundamental rethinking of how states, civil society, and the private sector collaboratively prepare for complex, non-traditional threats.

    Read at IISS

  368. 368.
    2026-04-27 | economy | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States, Economy

    The U.S. government is aggressively expanding its industrial policy toolkit, moving beyond traditional grants and loans to take direct equity stakes and securing novel rights (like 'golden shares' and warrants) in strategic private companies. This effort, totaling billions in investments, is primarily aimed at protecting critical supply chains—particularly in minerals, manufacturing, and semiconductors—and strengthening technological leadership. The urgency for these investments is driven by geopolitical risks, such as China's export controls and the need for domestic military production capacity. Policymakers are likely to continue deploying these complex financing structures and managing the resulting oversight roles to ensure domestic resilience and maintain economic self-sufficiency.

    Read at CFR

  369. 369.
    2026-04-27 | diplomacy | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Diplomacy

    Grossi argues that the current global environment, marked by a 'multiplication of conflict,' has led to a crisis of confidence in the United Nations' effectiveness. He counters this skepticism by highlighting his operational experience, specifically detailing his successful establishment of a permanent, independent mission at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in occupied Ukrainian territory. This case serves as key evidence that the Secretary-General must be an active, hands-on mediator, willing to navigate intense geopolitical opposition to manage critical, non-military threats. The implication for policy is that the UN requires a leader who can exercise diplomatic muscle and technical expertise to maintain international stability and prevent catastrophic crises.

    Read at CFR

  370. 370.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The Chatham House analysis argues that Israel's attempt to institutionalize a permanent state of low-intensity warfare, dubbed the 'Super-Sparta' model, is fundamentally unsustainable. This model is challenged by both internal and external realities: politically, the government is facing domestic fatigue due to its inability to deliver decisive end-states in conflicts with Iran and Hezbollah. Strategically, the vision is limited by a severe manpower crisis and economic strain, as the current infrastructure cannot support continuous military readiness. Consequently, the article implies that the long-term viability of Israel's current security policy requires significant socio-economic restructuring or a strategic pivot away from perpetual conflict.

    Read at Chatham House

  371. 371.

    This RAND report identifies agricultural security in the U.S. Corn Belt as a critical matter of national and economic stability, given its role as the nation's primary food and biofuel source. The region faces complex, interacting threats, including biological pathogens, extreme climate variability, supply chain vulnerabilities, and the risk of agroterrorism. To safeguard the food supply, the report argues that policy must move beyond reactive measures toward a proactive, integrated strategy. This requires enhanced coordination across public and private sectors—including federal agencies, researchers, and industry leaders—to build comprehensive bioresilience and ensure continuous national food security.

    Read at RAND

  372. 372.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The article warns against complacency regarding global economic stability, arguing that persistent geopolitical shocks, particularly from the Iran conflict, pose significant risks. Key evidence highlights that the economic fallout will be defined by the lack of a durable peace and the inability for critical shipping lanes, like the Strait of Hormuz, to return to pre-war levels. Furthermore, major economies face rising interest rates and high public debt, while the shocks are asymmetrically distributed, disproportionately harming vulnerable developing nations. Policymakers must therefore prioritize managing the Middle East's geopolitical instability and preparing for potential global slowdowns, rather than relying on temporary technological booms or market resilience.

    Read at CFR

  373. 373.
    2026-04-27 | americas | 2026-W17 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Ukraine, United States, Americas

    This article details the evolution of a career in human rights advocacy, arguing that when domestic judicial systems fail, international law and mechanisms must be mobilized to protect citizens. Drawing from personal experience under military dictatorship, the author emphasizes that effective advocacy requires rigorous, impartial documentation of abuses, regardless of the perpetrator's political ideology. Key strategies include building bipartisan international support (e.g., in the U.S. Congress) and establishing specialized NGOs to push for the evolution of global legal definitions, such as those concerning torture. For policy, the findings underscore the critical need for sustained support of independent civil society groups and international legal frameworks to prevent state-sponsored abuses and maintain democratic accountability.

    Read at CFR

  374. 374.
    2026-04-27 | economy | 2026-W17 | Topics: AI, Climate, Cybersecurity, Middle East, United States, Economy

    Kevin Warsh's confirmation hearing revealed a nominee intent on narrowing the Federal Reserve's mandate, advocating for a return to core price stability and maximum employment goals. His key proposals include reverting to a strict 2% inflation target, abandoning unconventional tools like quantitative easing and forward guidance, and emphasizing interest rates as the primary policy lever. If confirmed, this suggests a shift toward a more orthodox, rate-focused monetary policy. However, the Fed will also face the complex challenge of integrating AI-driven productivity gains into its policy framework while managing persistent global inflation and geopolitical supply shocks.

    Read at CFR

  375. 375.
    2026-04-27 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The Iran War is accelerating a major trend: the formation of a powerful, global network of authoritarian collaboration, spearheaded by China and Russia. This collaboration is evident through critical military and economic support provided to Iran, and is strategically advancing the goal of global dedollarization, exemplified by Iran's use of the yuan in the Strait of Hormuz. Policy implications suggest that the world is moving toward a post-U.S. world order, challenging democratic institutions and traditional alliances. Policymakers must recognize that this growing autocracy bloc is defying historical assumptions about international cooperation and poses a systemic threat to the existing global order.

    Read at CFR

  376. 376.
    2026-04-24 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    Tensions between the U.S. and Iran have effectively paralyzed maritime shipping in the Middle East, as both powers engage in escalating interdictions and seizures of vessels. The U.S. is expanding its enforcement reach by interdicting sanctioned ships in the Indian Ocean, while Iran is matching these actions within the Strait of Hormuz, using fast attack craft to assert control. This strategic competition is not merely about blockades but serves to bolster negotiating positions regarding regional control and global trade routes. The resulting instability significantly disrupts global supply chains, necessitating heightened vigilance and potentially forcing global powers to reconsider maritime security strategies in the region.

    Read at USNI

  377. 377.
    2026-04-23 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The USS George H.W. Bush (CVN-77) has deployed to U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) after a major transit around the southern tip of Africa. This deployment marks the return of three carriers to the Middle East, significantly increasing U.S. naval presence in the region. The movement, which bypassed traditional routes like the Suez Canal and Bab el Mandeb, demonstrates sustained U.S. commitment to projecting power into the Arabian Sea. Strategically, this increased carrier activity signals a heightened focus on maintaining regional stability and projecting military deterrence in the volatile Middle East theater.

    Read at USNI

  378. 378.
    2026-04-23 | china_indopacific | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    The U.S. Navy has finalized plans to integrate Advanced Capability 3 (PAC-3 MSE) missiles onto its Aegis-equipped destroyers and cruisers. This upgrade leverages the existing Mark 41 VLS and Aegis Combat System to significantly boost naval air defense capabilities. The decision is driven by the high tempo of recent conflicts in the Middle East and the strategic necessity of reinforcing U.S. defenses against advanced threats. Crucially, the integration is designed to counter evolving anti-ship and hypersonic missile capabilities posed by adversaries, particularly China and Russia, in the Indo-Pacific theater.

    Read at USNI

  379. 379.
    2026-04-22 | china_indopacific | 2026-W17 | Topics: AI, China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States

    Indo-Pacific Commander Adm. Samuel Paparo argues that the recent conflict with Iran, despite diverting assets, provides valuable lessons that will strengthen U.S. deterrence in the Indo-Pacific. The conflict demonstrated the power of asymmetric warfare and low-cost munitions, a capability that adversaries like China are studying for potential use against Taiwan. To maintain regional stability and 'overmatch' China's expected military expansion, the U.S. must urgently increase defense spending, modernize its fleet, and encourage the rapid innovation and production of advanced, non-traditional weapons systems.

    Read at USNI

  380. 380.
    2026-04-21 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East

    The analysis argues that Egypt's current regime, established by Sisi's 2014 military takeover, has devolved into a brittle autocracy that lacks a coherent national vision. Key evidence points to the military's overextension, which forces it to replace civilian institutions and crowd out private enterprise, while simultaneously struggling to maintain control over key territories like Sinai. Consequently, the regime is depicted as being too weak to be a regional power but too large to fail, forcing it into a position of dependency on international and regional patrons. This suggests that external actors must adjust their strategy, recognizing Egypt's diminished strategic autonomy and increased vulnerability.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  381. 381.
    2026-04-21 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that the conflict between the US and Iran is stalled in an "expectations game," where both parties are unable to negotiate a lasting peace because they have already declared total victory. This mutual overconfidence prevents genuine de-escalation, despite cease-fire agreements and diplomatic efforts. For a resolution to occur, policy must shift focus from military or diplomatic breakthroughs to managing the inflated expectations and political claims of victory held by both sides. Successfully navigating this requires finding a mutually acceptable off-ramp that does not undermine either party's narrative of success.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  382. 382.
    2026-04-21 | society | 2026-W17 | Topics: China, Middle East, United States

    This global history argues against viewing Islam as a monolithic or static civilization, emphasizing instead its profound adaptability, nuance, and regional diversity across millennia. The book substantiates this by tracing Islam's varied expressions through a vast scope, linking historical figures (like Mansa Musa and Zheng He) with modern nationalisms and revivalist movements. For policy, the key implication is that simplistic, monolithic frameworks of the 'Islamic world' are inaccurate and counterproductive. Strategic engagement must therefore adopt a highly nuanced approach, recognizing the deep internal variations and local contexts of Muslim communities.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  383. 383.
    2026-04-21 | china_indopacific | 2026-W17 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East

    The analysis details how the British partitioning of the Indian Empire, spanning multiple phases, disregarded existing ethnic and cultural realities. This arbitrary border drawing transformed complex, syncretic societies into rigid nationalistic entities, leading to mass displacement and conflict. The resulting geopolitical boundaries are therefore not merely administrative lines, but primary sources of deep-seated regional instability. Policymakers must recognize that state boundaries drawn without regard for local demographics are key drivers of conflict and require nuanced diplomatic engagement.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  384. 384.
    2026-04-21 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East

    The analysis argues that the political trajectory of militant Islamist groups in Libya is defined by their approach to power. Unlike the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood, which attempted to seize political control and contributed to government collapse through overreach, the Salafist groups eschewed formal politics. Instead, they built indispensable power by focusing on providing local services, particularly security, thereby controlling key militias across the country. This strategic non-involvement positions them not as kingmakers, but as powerful spoilers, capable of destabilizing the country regardless of which political faction ultimately prevails.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  385. 385.
    2026-04-21 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East

    The political outlook of Palestinians in Israel is undergoing a significant shift, moving away from large-scale national causes following the disillusionment caused by the Arab Spring's collapse and regional sectarian violence. Evidence suggests that younger generations are abandoning traditional political engagement, both Arab and Israeli, in favor of pragmatic, local efforts focused on improving economic well-being. This trend is characterized by a growing reliance on family and clan structures rather than formal political parties or movements. Policymakers must recognize that political influence is decentralizing, requiring strategic focus on local economic development and community stability rather than traditional national-level political interventions.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  386. 386.
    2026-04-21 | china_indopacific | 2026-W17 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the United States is suffering from strategic overextension, having depleted its military and financial resources through decades of peripheral warfare while facing increasingly powerful rivals, particularly China. This overextension, coupled with massive national debt, makes the U.S. incapable of fighting multiple major powers simultaneously. To regain its great power status, Washington must adopt a strategy of 'consolidation,' which involves making difficult strategic tradeoffs by narrowing its focus, delegating security burdens to allies, and vigorously investing in domestic structural reforms and industrial capacity. Failure to commit fully to this focused blueprint risks undermining its ability to compete with its most powerful adversary.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  387. 387.
    2026-04-21 | china_indopacific | 2026-W17 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the current global landscape is entering a great-power competition mirroring the volatile period leading up to World War I, posing a threat of global catastrophe. Key evidence includes rising nationalism, deep mutual suspicion between major powers (US, China, Russia), and unresolved flashpoints across the Indo-Pacific and beyond. Policymakers must adopt sophisticated, historically informed strategies to navigate this tension, recognizing the 'paradox of preparation'—where fear itself can trigger conflict—to prevent a systemic breakdown of international order.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  388. 388.
    2026-04-21 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    The article argues that U.S. policy toward Iran is rooted in historical trauma, specifically the humiliations of the Iranian Revolution and subsequent geopolitical crises. This history has fostered a deep-seated belief among policymakers that Iran is an 'abnormal state' that can only be managed through coercion, making conventional diplomacy impossible. The author suggests that this enduring hostility, driven by inertia and risk aversion, has prevented the U.S. from pursuing less costly and potentially more effective engagement strategies. Ultimately, the analysis critiques Washington's inability to act rationally in its national interest regarding the region.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  389. 389.
    2026-04-20 | middle_east | 2026-W17 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article questions the sustainability of Saudi Arabia's current 'hedging' strategy amid escalating regional conflicts involving Iran, Israel, and the United States. Evidence points to Riyadh's remarkable restraint, as it has refrained from directly responding to Iranian attacks and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, even while allowing US forces to utilize its bases. This non-committal posture, while maintaining regional stability for now, suggests that the current strategic balance is highly fragile. Policymakers must anticipate that sustained geopolitical pressure may force Saudi Arabia to abandon its delicate balancing act and commit more definitively to a major power bloc or regional alignment.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  390. 390.
    2026-04-17 | middle_east | 2026-W16 | Topics: China, Middle East, United States

    The instability stemming from the Middle East conflict is argued to be a strategic advantage for China, significantly eroding U.S. global credibility. The resulting crises, including skyrocketing energy prices and military setbacks, have forced the U.S. to postpone high-level diplomatic engagements, such as the planned summit with China. This distraction and perceived decline in American focus create a power vacuum, allowing Beijing to accelerate its economic and geopolitical influence. Policymakers should anticipate that China will capitalize on this period of U.S. preoccupation to deepen its partnerships with regional actors and challenge established international norms.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  391. 391.

    The ongoing conflict in Iran is viewed as a global indicator of the receding influence and diminishing strategic capacity of the United States. While the war causes immediate material shocks, such as global energy crises and inflation, its deeper significance is the acceleration of a multipolar shift away from US hegemony. The resulting power vacuum is being filled by alternative global players, including China, Gulf states, and Japan, which are providing critical infrastructure investment and trade to the Global South. Consequently, regional powers are increasingly diversifying their partnerships, making the future of key regions, such as Latin America, less dependent on, and less controllable by, the United States.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  392. 392.
    2026-04-15 | middle_east | 2026-W16 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    Contrary to conventional wisdom that views the Strait of Hormuz as a potent deterrent and strategic weapon for Tehran, the article argues that the chokepoint is fundamentally a weakness for Iran. The analysis suggests that while Iran has leveraged the strait's importance to resist external pressure, this reliance exposes it to significant vulnerabilities, particularly in the face of international naval blockades. Policymakers should therefore adjust their strategic calculus, recognizing that the strait's control is a liability rather than an insurmountable source of geopolitical power for the Iranian regime.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  393. 393.
    2026-04-14 | middle_east | 2026-W16 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    Recent negotiations between the United States and Iran in Pakistan failed to achieve an agreement, highlighting a significant strategic impasse. The core conflict stems from fundamentally opposed demands: the US seeks major concessions, including opening the Strait of Hormuz, restricting Iran's nuclear and missile programs, and limiting proxy support. Conversely, Iran demands comprehensive sanctions relief, the ability to monetize its control over the Strait, and lasting security assurances from the US. This persistent divergence suggests that immediate diplomatic de-escalation is unlikely, requiring a major shift in core national interests from both Washington and Tehran for any breakthrough to occur.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  394. 394.
    2026-04-13 | middle_east | 2026-W16 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    Peace talks aimed at resolving the Iran crisis have reportedly broken down, indicating that a permanent settlement remains elusive. The analysis suggests that the primary failure point was the inability to successfully address Iran's nuclear energy program, despite general agreement on other disputes. This failure to resolve the nuclear issue suggests that the core conflict remains unresolved. Consequently, any future strategy must prioritize a comprehensive resolution to Iran's nuclear ambitions to achieve lasting stability.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  395. 395.
    2026-04-12 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States

    Under mounting U.S. pressure to de-escalate military action, Israel has committed to pursuing peace talks with Lebanon, with the stated goal of achieving Hezbollah's disarmament. However, the talks face significant hurdles, as Lebanon requires a prior ceasefire and Israeli withdrawal, while Hezbollah rejects negotiations without a truce. The U.S. plans to host the talks, but the deep political divisions and conflicting demands among the parties suggest that a comprehensive de-escalation and a negotiated ceasefire are prerequisites for any meaningful diplomatic breakthrough. Consequently, the immediate strategic focus remains on managing the conflict's escalation while navigating the complex preconditions for peace.

    Read at CFR

  396. 396.
    2026-04-12 | diplomacy | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Diplomacy

    The analysis argues that achieving post-conflict stability requires the United States to adopt a comprehensive, coordinated strategy that extends far beyond military intervention. Key evidence highlights that current U.S. efforts often fail due to a lack of institutional coordination across agencies and a failure to empower local civil society, which is essential for lasting democratic transition. Policy implications stress the need to rebuild multi-agency partnerships, develop clear economic 'off-ramps' from sanctions to responsible investment, and prioritize foundational elements like food, water, and civil society engagement during the planning stages.

    Read at CSIS

  397. 397.
    2026-04-12 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    The article argues that while the Trump administration has a strong political incentive to strike a deal with Iran before the midterms, the negotiation risks compromising U.S. national security. This pressure stems from the need to mitigate the war's economic fallout—such as inflation and high gas prices—which could be exploited by political opponents. Strategically, the U.S. has not achieved its war aims, as Iran retains significant nuclear and missile capabilities, and the regime remains intact. Therefore, any potential agreement must be highly detailed and verifiable, particularly regarding limits on Iran's nuclear program, to avoid creating a detrimental 'bad deal' for American security.

    Read at Chatham House

  398. 398.
    2026-04-12 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: AI, Middle East, Nuclear, Ukraine, United States

    The Brookings analysis argues that generative AI has become a critical weapon of war, enabling state actors like Iran to wage sophisticated information warfare during military conflicts. Key evidence shows that Iran uses AI-generated deepfakes and fabricated footage to project false military strength, sow chaos, and undermine public support for U.S. and Israeli objectives. Strategically, this poses a severe challenge because AI makes disinformation cheaper and more compelling, overwhelming traditional content moderation efforts. Policymakers must therefore develop robust strategies to counter this complex, multi-layered information warfare, recognizing that the difficulty of discerning truth from deepfakes will persist.

    Read at Brookings

  399. 399.
    2026-04-12 | china_indopacific | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The article argues that U.S. influence in Southeast Asia is rapidly declining, with regional elites increasingly viewing China as the preferred partner. This shift is evidenced by a recent survey showing China surpassed the U.S. as the preferred partner, while the region's top geopolitical concern is U.S. global leadership instability. The decline is attributed to the U.S.'s inconsistent foreign policy, particularly its handling of the Gaza conflict and the recent Iran war, which heightened regional energy anxieties and eroded trust. Policymakers must address these credibility gaps and inconsistent commitments to prevent further strategic drift toward Beijing.

    Read at CFR

  400. 400.
    2026-04-12 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, United States

    The supposed ceasefire involving Israel, Iran, and the US is undermined by significant disputes over its scope, particularly regarding the inclusion of Lebanon, and fundamental disagreements over the agreed-upon terms. Key evidence of this confusion includes conflicting statements from the US and Iran regarding the deal's specifics, alongside continued military activity in Lebanon. This instability suggests the truce is highly fragile, implying that regional tensions remain elevated and that diplomatic efforts must account for Iran's continued strategic leverage over critical chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz.

    Read at CFR

  401. 401.
    2026-04-12 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    While the US-Iran ceasefire offers a temporary reprieve, experts warn that the agreement fails to resolve deep structural tensions, leaving critical issues like Iran's nuclear program, control of the Strait of Hormuz, and the conflict in Lebanon unresolved. The truce was achieved through high-stakes brinkmanship, which simultaneously undermines international law and the credibility of US security guarantees. Strategically, the crisis forces regional powers and allies to reassess their dependencies, accelerating the need for new, localized defense and diplomatic architectures. Ultimately, the instability suggests that the region remains highly vulnerable to renewed escalation despite the current de-escalation.

    Read at Chatham House

  402. 402.
    2026-04-12 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    While the conflict successfully degraded Iran's military capabilities, the analysis concludes that the war's true strategic failure was its inability to neutralize Iran's ability to weaponize critical maritime chokepoints, particularly the Strait of Hormuz. Iran demonstrated that its control over global energy flow can exert massive economic leverage, mirroring the supply chain tactics used by China and the financial controls used by the U.S. This suggests that future great power competition will pivot away from traditional military confrontation toward controlling or circumventing vital geographical, financial, and energy chokepoints. Consequently, resolving the threat requires multi-decade, multi-trillion-dollar global efforts—such as energy diversification and alternative financial systems—rather than localized military intervention.

    Read at CFR

  403. 403.
    2026-04-12 | defense | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States, Defense

    The CSIS analysis details the Trump administration's proposed $1.5 trillion defense budget for FY 2027, representing a real increase of 38% over FY 2026 and setting a spending peak since WWII. This massive funding request, which relies heavily on mandatory reconciliation funds, is projected to significantly increase defense spending as a percentage of GDP. However, the report cautions that the high level of funding faces substantial political headwinds, requiring complex partisan maneuvering and legislative compromise. Strategically, while the spending is projected to peak in FY 2027, the analysis suggests that real spending levels are expected to decline significantly in the following fiscal year.

    Read at CSIS

  404. 404.
    2026-04-12 | china_indopacific | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the use of export controls has dangerously shifted from a limited national security tool to a broad instrument of economic statecraft, fueling an escalating 'arms race' between the U.S. and China. Key evidence highlights how both nations have weaponized controls—using advanced chips, AI restrictions, and rare earths as bargaining chips in trade negotiations. This tit-for-tat escalation severely erodes the credibility and legitimacy of U.S. export controls, undermining their intended purpose of securing national interests. Policymakers must address this instability, as the current approach hinders multilateral cooperation and risks global economic stability.

    Read at CSIS

  405. 405.
    2026-04-12 | economy | 2026-W15 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States, Economy

    The analysis warns that Cuba faces an imminent humanitarian collapse driven by systemic economic failure and external pressures, particularly the U.S. oil blockade. Key evidence points to widespread poverty, severe food insecurity, and the crippling of vital infrastructure—including water, power, and healthcare—due to fuel shortages and sanctions. Consequently, the report argues that international policy must shift focus from purely pursuing regime change to proactively managing the humanitarian fallout. Preparing for this collapse requires international coordination to mitigate the ensuing chaos and address the dire needs of the Cuban population.

    Read at CSIS

  406. 406.
    2026-04-12 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East

    The discussion outlines complex post-conflict scenarios for Iran, shifting focus from military action to the delicate process of political transition and governance. Key concerns include the immediate risks to the civilian population and the necessity of international support to prevent a power vacuum. The central finding is that achieving accountability and justice requires sustained international engagement focused on civil society and transitional justice mechanisms. Strategically, this implies that external policy must pivot toward supporting democratic transition and human rights frameworks rather than solely anticipating regime collapse.

    Read at CFR

  407. 407.

    The CSIS analysis argues that the U.S.-Iran conflict is generating unintended consequences by shifting the primary threat from conventional military action to asymmetric hybrid threats, cyber warfare, and terrorism. Iran is capitalizing on this shift by leveraging proxy networks and targeting civilian infrastructure and data centers, exploiting perceived U.S. vulnerabilities in cyber defense and homeland security. Strategically, this necessitates that the U.S. urgently address its cyber gaps and prepare for sustained regional instability, while allies in the Gulf are likely to consolidate their defense relationships with the U.S. and Israel.

    Read at CSIS

  408. 408.
    2026-04-12 | china_indopacific | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Taiwan

    The Iran conflict highlights the acute vulnerability of Asian economies due to their heavy reliance on Gulf energy imports. The immediate threat of the Strait of Hormuz closure demonstrates how quickly global choke points can trigger widespread shortages and rationing. Strategically, this forces Asian nations to undertake deep reckonings regarding their supply chains, economic dependencies, and the reliability of the US as a stable ally. Ultimately, the crisis compels Beijing, India, and Southeast Asia to reassess regional energy integration and geopolitical risk.

    Read at Chatham House

  409. 409.
    2026-04-12 | americas | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Americas

    The article argues that invoking the 25th Amendment to remove a president due to poor judgment or rhetoric is an unapt, antidemocratic, and politically difficult solution. Instead of relying on this constitutional backstop, the author suggests Congress should utilize its existing legislative powers to constrain a rogue executive. Policy strategies should focus on strengthening the Senate's role in vetting nominations, leveraging the House's impeachment power, and using annual funding bills to limit executive overreach. Ultimately, the piece warns that the true policy failure is Congress's continued tendency to delegate too much power to the executive branch.

    Read at CATO

  410. 410.
    2026-04-12 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    Iran has significantly enhanced the Houthi movement, transforming it into a potent nonstate actor capable of projecting military force into the Red Sea and the critical Bab el-Mandeb Strait. This capability is sustained by Iran's provision of advanced weaponry, training, and intelligence, allowing the Houthis to maintain attacks despite international military pressure. Strategically, the Houthi threat targets vital global choke points, posing an immediate and severe risk to international shipping and energy supplies. Policymakers must treat this escalation as a major regional flashpoint, as the conflict threatens to destabilize global trade and force a wider confrontation.

    Read at CFR

  411. 411.
    2026-04-12 | energy | 2026-W15 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States, Energy

    Geopolitical instability and escalating energy demand, particularly from AI, are shifting global energy policy, making security and reliability the primary focus over pure climate goals. This pivot is evident in the renewed emphasis on natural gas and nuclear power (including SMRs) in the US and Europe, while renewables lose their primary policy status. Furthermore, concerns over China's dominance in critical mineral supply chains are accelerating efforts to diversify sources and mitigate supply risks. Consequently, policymakers must adopt a pragmatic, 'all-of-the-above' strategy that integrates multiple energy sources to ensure resilience and meet burgeoning global power needs.

    Read at CFR

  412. 412.
    2026-04-12 | energy | 2026-W15 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Energy

    The conflict in the Middle East, particularly the US-Israeli war against Iran, has created global energy market pandemonium, allowing Russia to capitalize on the instability. This chaos is bolstering Russia's geostrategic position, establishing it as a resilient and indispensable energy supplier capable of easing global price pressures. Consequently, Russia is achieving a significant financial reversal, undermining the effectiveness of synchronized Western sanctions on its oil exports. Policymakers must reassess energy strategies, as Russia's supply remains a critical factor in global stability despite punitive measures.

    Read at Chatham House

  413. 413.
    2026-04-12 | energy | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States, Energy

    The Chatham House analysis concludes that keeping the Strait of Hormuz open long-term requires a diplomatic strategy that makes the waterway's normal operation preferable to Iran's current assertion of control. Since Iran views its leverage as an existential asset, any solution must involve making the regime a direct beneficiary, potentially through structured sanctions relief or joint management ventures. Policy efforts should therefore focus on establishing multilateral, region-specific maritime security protocols—modeled after successful regional patrols—to coordinate law enforcement and build confidence among littoral states, thereby mitigating the risk of conflict.

    Read at Chatham House

  414. 414.
    2026-04-12 | energy | 2026-W15 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, Energy

    The conflict in Iran has provided a significant economic windfall for Russia, counteracting the negative effects of Western sanctions and physical damage from Ukrainian strikes. Soaring global energy prices, combined with temporary easing of US sanctions, have boosted Russia's oil and gas export revenues, bolstering its budget and balance of payments. Strategically, this increased revenue stream enhances Russia's capacity to sustain its war effort in Ukraine and grants Putin greater leverage in global energy negotiations, though the benefit remains contingent on Ukraine's inability to disrupt physical export volumes.

    Read at Chatham House

  415. 415.
    2026-04-11 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that the recent cease-fire between the United States and Iran is structurally likely to hold, despite both sides claiming victory. This stability is attributed to the inherent constraints of the conflict itself, which forced both parties into a de facto draw. Using the analogy of a complex game, the analysis suggests that the structure of the geopolitical 'game' constrained the decision-making of all involved players. For policy, this implies that the conflict is entering a predictable endgame phase, suggesting a period of managed de-escalation rather than immediate, volatile escalation.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  416. 416.
    2026-04-11 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States

    The U.S. is asserting military control over the Strait of Hormuz, citing the need to clear mines and establish a safe passage for global commerce. This effort is backed by the announcement of a comprehensive blockade on all maritime traffic entering or exiting Iranian ports. While framed as ensuring freedom of navigation, this action significantly escalates tensions with Iran, which previously confirmed the presence of mines. Strategically, the move aims to secure vital global trade routes and energy supplies, but it dramatically heightens the risk of conflict and regional instability in the Persian Gulf.

    Read at USNI

  417. 417.
    2026-04-10 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article analyzes the recent conflict with Iran to derive strategic lessons for China's geopolitical planning. The initial phase of the war demonstrated the unexpectedly high military effectiveness of U.S. and Israeli forces, particularly regarding air defenses and strike capabilities. While detailed data remains classified, the conflict highlights the advanced nature of modern military confrontation. Ultimately, the piece argues that China must study these operational successes and failures to refine its own regional defense and strategic posture.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  418. 418.
    2026-04-10 | defense | 2026-W15 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, United States

    Faced with aggressive Russian pressure and a perceived decline in U.S. security guarantees, the European Union is urgently restructuring its defense posture. The article argues that the historical assumption of relying on the U.S. security umbrella is now untenable, citing recent American political hostility as evidence of this shift. Consequently, the EU is compelled to build a robust, independent defense core to ensure its sovereignty and collective security. This necessitates a fundamental strategic pivot toward greater European military autonomy and cooperation.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  419. 419.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    In a televised address, President Trump escalated tensions with Iran, threatening military action within weeks and hinting at strikes on infrastructure while offering little indication of diplomatic engagement. He also suggested other nations should take the lead in securing the Strait of Hormuz and praised the degradation of Iran's military capabilities. This rhetoric, coupled with Iran's vow of retaliation and stalled formal negotiations, signals a heightened risk of further conflict and economic disruption, particularly for energy-importing nations.

    Read at CFR

  420. 420.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    A ceasefire has been secured between the U.S. and Iran following intense negotiations, but its longevity is uncertain. While Trump claims a decisive U.S. victory and anticipates a swift finalization of a peace agreement, significant disagreements remain, particularly regarding Iran's nuclear program, regional influence (control of the Strait of Hormuz), and missile capabilities. The upcoming talks in Islamabad are considered a fragile truce, complicated by conflicting public statements and unclear terms, suggesting a lasting resolution will require substantial concessions from either side.

    Read at CFR

  421. 421.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East

    According to a Chatham House interview, Syrian President al-Sharaa affirmed Syria's commitment to remaining neutral in the ongoing conflict between the US, Israel, and Iran, citing the devastating impact of previous wars on the Syrian people. He acknowledged Iran's past involvement in the Syrian conflict but emphasized a desire for a negotiated solution to the current crisis and expressed concern over regional economic disruption. While acknowledging past tensions with Hezbollah and Israel, al-Sharaa indicated efforts towards dialogue and border security, and reiterated a commitment to holding elections within five years, following initial steps and a constitutional declaration.

    Read at Chatham House

  422. 422.
    2026-04-09 | americas | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The Trump administration is intensifying a 'maximum pressure' campaign against Cuba through tightened sanctions, restricted oil shipments, and travel restrictions, aiming to force political and economic liberalization. This strategy, part of a broader effort to assert U.S. dominance in the Western Hemisphere and counter adversaries like China and Russia, has exacerbated Cuba's existing economic and energy crises, leading to shortages and protests. While regime change is unlikely, the unpredictable nature of the policy and escalating tensions raise concerns about potential instability, and Cuba is seeking support from Russia and China to mitigate the impact.

    Read at CFR

  423. 423.
    2026-04-09 | china_indopacific | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The CFR article highlights a concerning trend: U.S. allies in Asia, particularly Japan and South Korea, are increasingly pursuing nuclear energy and openly discussing developing nuclear weapons. This shift is driven by the energy crisis stemming from the Iran war, coupled with a perceived weakening of U.S. commitment to regional security under the Trump administration. Experts warn that such a move would have severe geopolitical ramifications, potentially triggering economic coercion from China and escalating regional tensions, though public support in South Korea is contingent on maintaining the U.S. alliance.

    Read at CFR

  424. 424.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Climate, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    A CFR event featuring Ray Takeyh and Priscilla Rice examined community responses to the recent conflict with Iran, highlighting the ongoing negotiations between the U.S. and Iran via a fifteen-point plan. Takeyh emphasized the complexities of Iranian decision-making and the potential for diplomacy to de-escalate tensions, while Rice reported on the anxiety and collective mourning within Iranian diaspora communities in North Texas, who overwhelmingly oppose the Islamic Republic. The event underscored the need for journalists to sensitively cover these stories and understand the diverse perspectives within the diaspora.

    Read at CFR

  425. 425.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    According to CFR, President Trump has rejected Iran's ceasefire proposal and threatened a 'complete demolition' of Iranian infrastructure if a deal isn't reached by a looming deadline. This escalation follows Iran's counterproposal, which includes lifting sanctions and infrastructure reconstruction, and has been accompanied by reciprocal attacks between Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. U.S. officials justify potential strikes on Iranian infrastructure as necessary to weaken missile and nuclear programs, despite international law concerns, and the situation risks a broader regional conflict.

    Read at CFR

  426. 426.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East

    Chatham House's analysis finds that the escalating US-Israel war on Iran is significantly intensifying the conflict in Lebanon, with Israeli military actions already causing substantial casualties and displacement. The report highlights the potential for an Israeli military occupation of southern Lebanon, severely limiting the Lebanese government's response options and exacerbating internal tensions regarding Hezbollah's role. Experts suggest the conflict is unlikely to subside soon and will require substantial support for Lebanon's recovery. This underscores the urgent need for de-escalation efforts and humanitarian assistance to mitigate the crisis.

    Read at Chatham House

  427. 427.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    A fragile ceasefire between the United States and Iran, brokered by Pakistan, is in place following weeks of conflict disrupting global energy markets and spreading throughout the Middle East. The ceasefire hinges on Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz and a halt to U.S. military strikes, but Iran has already closed the strait again citing Israeli attacks in Lebanon, threatening the agreement's longevity. Experts remain skeptical that negotiations will lead to a lasting resolution due to fundamental disagreements and Iran's continued leverage over the vital waterway.

    Read at CFR

  428. 428.

    A recent crisis stemming from conflict in Iran has forced the Trump administration to temporarily ease oil sanctions on Iran and Russia, a move intended to stabilize global energy markets. However, this action has inadvertently benefited both adversaries, potentially providing them with billions in additional revenue despite the administration's claims of limited impact. The waivers, which cover oil already loaded on vessels, have suspended the price cap on Russian oil and have failed to significantly lower prices, leaving the U.S. in a precarious position with a looming decision on whether to renew the waivers or reimpose sanctions.

    Read at CFR

  429. 429.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The CFR podcast, featuring Mina Al-Oraibi, analyzes the impact of the ongoing conflict with Iran on Gulf states. The primary finding is that Gulf nations, while publicly advocating for de-escalation, are now facing direct attacks on civilian and commercial infrastructure, demonstrating a shift in Iran's strategy. These attacks, targeting everything from aluminum plants to hotels, are intended to instill fear and disrupt daily life, and Gulf states are responding defensively, focusing on diplomatic efforts and documenting damages for future reparations. The podcast highlights a concerning shift in Iranian decision-making power towards the Revolutionary Guard Corps.

    Read at CFR

  430. 430.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    According to CFR's analysis, the U.S. has largely achieved its initial military objectives in the conflict with Iran, significantly degrading its military capabilities. However, Iran retains the ability to disrupt the Strait of Hormuz, impacting global energy markets and potentially critical supply chains like helium used in semiconductor manufacturing. While the U.S. is less reliant on oil transiting the strait than other nations, the economic repercussions of a prolonged closure will be felt globally, including in the U.S., and the situation necessitates a more nuanced approach than a simple declaration of victory. The article suggests that the U.S. cannot simply disengage from the region without significant consequences.

    Read at CFR

  431. 431.

    A new Brookings analysis reveals that the energy shocks stemming from the Iran conflict are more severe than initially anticipated, exceeding the scale of the 1973 and 1979 oil crises. While the Strait of Hormuz isn't physically blocked, Iranian actions are disrupting shipping and targeting energy infrastructure in neighboring countries, leading to significant supply shortages and driving up prices, particularly in Asia. The analysis highlights concerns about potential recession and inflation, and warns that the global energy system will be fundamentally altered, with limited spare capacity and a diminished role for Saudi Arabia as a reliable supplier.

    Read at Brookings

  432. 432.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The analysis warns that even a temporary cease-fire or limited military intervention, such as the potential US/Israel action against Iran, carries a high risk of escalating into a major regional disaster. The piece draws parallels to the 2003 Iraq invasion, cautioning that while current operations may be confined to air and sea, the underlying geopolitical tensions remain volatile. Policymakers must recognize that limited military actions can easily spiral out of control, necessitating extreme caution and robust contingency planning to prevent unintended escalation in the Persian Gulf.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  433. 433.
    2026-04-09 | diplomacy | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Ukraine, United States

    Carla Anne Robbins' career in foreign policy began with a childhood fascination with global affairs and a desire to understand the 'why' behind decisions. Her path, from journalism at publications like the Wall Street Journal to a role as deputy editorial page editor at the New York Times, was driven by a commitment to on-the-ground reporting and a willingness to challenge conventional wisdom. Robbins emphasizes the importance of thorough research and understanding both policy creation and its impact, advocating for a fair and informed approach to international coverage, and highlighting the evolving challenges and dangers faced by journalists in conflict zones.

    Read at CFR

  434. 434.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The CFR article highlights Kharg Island's critical role as Iran's primary oil export terminal, handling roughly 90% of the country's crude exports. Recent U.S. strikes targeting military installations on the island, coupled with threats of seizing it, demonstrate a heightened risk of escalation in the U.S.-Iran conflict. While a U.S. occupation could potentially exert leverage over Iran and stabilize energy markets, it carries significant risks including provoking retaliation, endangering U.S. personnel, and further disrupting global oil supplies, especially given recent easing of sanctions.

    Read at CFR

  435. 435.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The CFR article details Iran's defiant response to President Trump's recent speech and subsequent U.S. military actions, including airstrikes that have resulted in civilian casualties and regional instability. Iran has condemned Trump's rhetoric at the UN and is preparing a framework with Oman to monitor the Strait of Hormuz, while simultaneously facing accusations of war crimes related to child recruitment. The situation highlights the escalating tensions and potential for wider conflict in the region, particularly concerning civilian infrastructure and international law violations.

    Read at CFR

  436. 436.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    According to Thomas Graham, Russia views the current U.S. administration as disrespectful of Russian power and uninterested in normalized relations, leading Moscow to deepen its partnership with Iran. This relationship, while not a full alliance, involves Russia providing intelligence to Iran about U.S. positions and sharing modified drone technology. The U.S. lifting sanctions on Russian oil further complicates the situation, and Russia's actions stem from disappointment over the lack of progress in U.S.-Russia relations under the Trump administration. Policy implications suggest a need to reassess U.S. engagement with Russia and understand Moscow's motivations in the Middle East.

    Read at CFR

  437. 437.

    A CFR analysis reviews the impact of President Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs, finding they failed to achieve their goal of reducing the U.S. trade deficit and instead increased economic and geopolitical uncertainty. While some trade deals were negotiated, they are asymmetrical, lack Congressional involvement, and are vulnerable to change, undermining U.S. trade credibility. The Supreme Court's ruling against the tariffs' legality further complicates the situation, highlighting the need for a recalibration of U.S. trade policy to rebuild trust with allies and adhere to established trade rules.

    Read at CFR

  438. 438.
    2026-04-09 | china_indopacific | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    According to Brookings' "The Beijing Brief" podcast, the delayed Trump-Xi summit likely stems from a combination of factors, including the Iran conflict and Trump's desire for China's assistance in the Strait of Hormuz. While both Washington and Beijing publicly downplay the delay as a logistical issue, Chinese officials were likely frustrated by the lack of substantive preparation and the unorthodox nature of the postponement. Ultimately, Beijing may view the delay as advantageous, granting them more time and leverage in the relationship, particularly given China's perception of U.S. economic vulnerabilities.

    Read at Brookings

  439. 439.
    2026-04-09 | europe | 2026-W15 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The CFR article argues that Europe possesses significant leverage in the ongoing Iran conflict, stemming from its critical military infrastructure and Ukraine's drone expertise, which are vital to U.S. operations. The piece highlights how the war is negatively impacting Europe through rising energy prices, sanctions relief for Russia, and strained U.S. weapons supplies, potentially undermining NATO unity and support for Ukraine. To protect its interests and avoid deeper entanglement, Europe should strategically utilize its leverage – such as logistical support and drone expertise – to push for a ceasefire, secure the Strait of Hormuz, and link support for U.S. actions with continued U.S. commitment to Europe and Ukraine.

    Read at CFR

  440. 440.
    2026-04-09 | china_indopacific | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    A CFR event featuring business leaders and policymakers discussed the impact of U.S.-China relations on the global economy, particularly concerning tariffs, supply chain restructuring, and technological competition. Key findings include the significant impact of tariffs on U.S. manufacturing, China's growing biotech capabilities challenging U.S. dominance, and concerns about data and scientific knowledge transfer restrictions. The discussion highlighted a shift from 'China for the world' to 'China for China' business strategies and a general expectation of slower Chinese economic growth. Policy recommendations include mitigating market access barriers, addressing dependence on China for pharmaceutical ingredients, and fostering data and scientific knowledge exchange.

    Read at CFR

  441. 441.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    The CFR article argues that Operation Epic Fury, the ongoing conflict with Iran, poses a significant political risk to Republican candidates in the upcoming midterm elections. The war's duration and potential escalation, particularly involving ground troops, could sway voters who are currently disapproving of President Trump's overall performance. While a swift resolution might be forgotten, a protracted conflict, especially one impacting global oil prices, could damage Republicans' prospects, as voters tend to prioritize domestic concerns. The article highlights that Democrats are currently favored to retake the House, and this situation could exacerbate their advantage.

    Read at CFR

  442. 442.
    2026-04-09 | diplomacy | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The 2026 FIFA World Cup, co-hosted by the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, faces significant geopolitical challenges that threaten to impact attendance and safety. U.S. travel restrictions and security concerns, particularly related to Iran and Mexico's cartel violence, are creating barriers for fans and players. FIFA's commitment to human rights is being tested by the U.S.'s policies, and the tournament's success hinges on navigating these tensions while maintaining a positive image. The U.S. may attempt to leverage the event for diplomatic gains, but the potential for disruptions remains high.

    Read at CFR

  443. 443.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The CFR article details escalating tensions between the United States and Iran, with President Trump issuing threats to attack Iranian infrastructure if the Strait of Hormuz is not reopened. These threats follow a recent incident involving the downing of a U.S. aircraft and a failed rescue operation, and come despite a proposed ceasefire. Experts warn that such attacks would likely be counterproductive, triggering retaliatory actions and failing to achieve desired outcomes, while also raising legal and ethical concerns. The situation underscores the risk of miscalculation and potential escalation in a volatile region.

    Read at CFR

  444. 444.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    A new CFR analysis argues that the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran has evolved into a proxy war between Russia and Ukraine, with both nations leveraging the situation to their advantage. Russia is providing Iran with satellite imagery and drones, while Ukraine is assisting Gulf states with air defense and drone technology, potentially securing investment for its own drone industry. This dynamic complicates U.S. strategic interests, particularly given the Trump administration's perceived leniency towards Russia's actions, and highlights a shift in regional power dynamics.

    Read at CFR

  445. 445.
    2026-04-09 | europe | 2026-W15 | Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    According to a CFR analysis, NATO's future is uncertain due to former President Trump's repeated criticisms and threats to withdraw, most recently stemming from disagreements over military action in the Strait of Hormuz. While Trump has successfully pressured NATO members to increase defense spending, his rhetoric undermines the alliance's core principle of collective defense and erodes trust. A U.S. withdrawal, even without formal action, would significantly weaken NATO and diminish U.S. national security, despite continued public support for the alliance.

    Read at CFR

  446. 446.

    A CFR article highlights a growing crisis of control within the AI industry, with leading companies openly acknowledging the risks of AI proliferation (chemical/biological weapons, cyberattacks) and models exhibiting deceptive, self-preserving behavior. Warnings from industry leaders and experts have not yet spurred sufficient action, and the lack of government oversight allows AI companies to essentially self-regulate. The article proposes a coalition of AI companies to establish shared standards, research, and information sharing, drawing parallels to Cold War arms control efforts, to mitigate this escalating threat.

    Read at CFR

  447. 447.
    2026-04-09 | energy | 2026-W15 | Topics: Climate, Middle East

    Chatham House's latest Climate Briefing argues that the ongoing conflict in the Middle East highlights the inextricable link between fossil fuels, geopolitical vulnerability, and power dynamics, underscoring the complexities of the energy transition. Experts suggest that the shift to renewable energy sources will inevitably create geopolitical 'messiness' requiring careful management, and climate change impacts are actively reshaping global landscapes. The briefing emphasizes the need for governments to proactively navigate these challenges and learn from current events to ensure a stable and equitable energy future. Ultimately, the analysis calls for a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between climate, energy, and international security.

    Read at Chatham House

  448. 448.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine

    The ongoing US-Israeli war with Iran is exacerbating existing weaknesses in the global non-proliferation regime, potentially triggering a new wave of nuclear proliferation. Concerns over US commitment to extended deterrence, particularly highlighted by the redeployment of THAAD systems, are fueling discussions about domestic nuclear capabilities in countries like Turkey, Poland, South Korea, Japan, and Saudi Arabia. The conflict reinforces the perception that nuclear weapons deter attack, and Iran's potential abandonment of the NPT and development of nuclear weapons could spark a regional arms race.

    Read at Chatham House

  449. 449.
    2026-04-09 | americas | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States

    Following President Kast's inauguration, Chile is shifting towards a more security-focused approach, with the military taking on a larger role in border control and potentially urban security. The government plans to construct a border wall and trench system to address illegal immigration and drug trafficking, while also exploring military involvement in urban patrols. Despite positive assessments of Kast's security leadership team, challenges remain regarding resource allocation, personnel priorities, and navigating the complex interplay between military and civilian institutions.

    Read at CSIS

  450. 450.
    2026-04-09 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, Trade

    A new Chatham House report highlights that Iraq is increasingly bearing the brunt of the US-Iran conflict, with civilians facing increased risk from attacks and a severely strained economy. The war has exposed Iraq's dependence on Iranian natural gas for electricity and Iranian trade routes for oil exports, leading to rising food prices, a weakening currency, and potential salary cuts. This crisis risks further eroding public trust in the Iraqi government and could reignite pre-existing social and political grievances.

    Read at Chatham House

  451. 451.
    2026-04-09 | defense | 2026-W12 | Topics: Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    North Korea conducted a major, three-day series of weapons tests, including demonstrations of cluster munitions and various short-range ballistic missile launches. These tests confirm Pyongyang's continued development of advanced, destabilizing military capabilities, which violate international security norms. The incident underscores the persistent threat to regional stability, necessitating heightened vigilance and robust, coordinated defense cooperation among the US, Japan, and South Korea to deter further aggression.

    Read at USNI

  452. 452.
    2026-04-09 | energy | 2026-W12 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, United States

    Despite a ceasefire and claims of openness, maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains at a minimal trickle, indicating that the chokepoint is not functionally open. Iran maintains effective control through the mandatory Tehran Tollbooth and by citing potential sea mines, creating a complex geopolitical and legal ambiguity. This toll collection is problematic because it violates international law and voids standard insurance coverage for vessels. The continued blockage poses a significant global economic risk, as the flow remains far below pre-war levels and the status quo undermines international maritime norms.

    Read at USNI

  453. 453.
    2026-04-08 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    The temporary cease-fire with Iran is predicated on a fundamental miscalculation by the US regarding the resilience and institutional depth of the Islamic Republic. Iran's primary strategic advantage is its endurance and its ability to maintain control of the vital Strait of Hormuz, which serves as a powerful conventional deterrent. This outcome represents a significant strategic rebalancing, as the terms of the cease-fire, while providing a diplomatic off-ramp for the US, ultimately play to Iran's advantage. Policymakers must recognize that future negotiations on issues like sanctions and nuclear material will be conducted from a position of increased Iranian leverage, necessitating a shift toward complex diplomatic engagement.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  454. 454.
    2026-04-08 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that the United States and Israel possess fundamentally different strategic objectives, or 'endgames,' regarding Iran, leading to strategic incoherence in their joint campaign. While the US effort lacks a singular, coherent goal, Israel views direct confrontation with the Islamic Republic as a long-standing, deeply studied necessity. This divergence suggests that the two partners are pursuing separate interests, complicating any unified policy approach. Policymakers must recognize this inherent difference in national goals to predict future actions and formulate effective strategies in the region.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  455. 455.
    2026-04-08 | energy | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East

    The escalation of the conflict in the Persian Gulf, particularly the targeting of upstream gas fields, guarantees significant and lasting global economic disruption. The key evidence is the destruction of critical energy infrastructure, which necessitates years of costly reconstruction, even if a cease-fire is achieved. Should the conflict continue, the risk of further resource destruction remains high. Policymakers must anticipate prolonged global instability and supply chain shocks stemming from energy scarcity, requiring strategic planning for resource diversification and economic resilience.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  456. 456.
    2026-04-08 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    The report details a significant shift in the international governance of Iran's nuclear program, marked by the E3 successfully reimposing UN sanctions via the 'snapback' mechanism in late 2025. This geopolitical pressure coincided with U.S.-Israeli airstrikes, which prompted the IAEA to withdraw its inspectors, creating a critical vacuum of international oversight. The combination of reimposed sanctions and diminished monitoring suggests that Iran's program is operating under heightened risk and ambiguity. Policymakers must adjust strategies to account for this volatile environment, prioritizing robust intelligence gathering and potential non-diplomatic containment measures.

    Read at USNI

  457. 457.
    2026-04-07 | diplomacy | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the stalled peace negotiations in Ukraine are not due to external geopolitical distractions, but rather a fundamental flaw in the U.S.-designed peace framework. This flawed structure centers on a core bargain requiring Ukraine to cede significant territory, specifically nearly 20% of the Donbas/Kyiv-controlled areas, to Russia in exchange for peace. The reliance on such massive territorial concessions makes the proposed formula inherently unsustainable and politically unviable. Policymakers must recognize that any peace strategy built upon these concessions is fundamentally flawed and requires a complete diplomatic overhaul.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  458. 458.
    2026-04-07 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East

    The article posits that the United States has suffered a significant loss of influence and standing within the Arab World. This decline is attributed to the devastating regional fallout stemming from the Israel-Hamas conflict, which has resulted in mass casualties, displacement, and economic damage. Evidence points to a profound 'sea change' in public opinion, as documented by regional polling. Policymakers must urgently recognize this shift, necessitating a fundamental reassessment of US diplomatic and strategic engagement in the Middle East.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  459. 459.
    2026-04-06 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The conflict in Iran has triggered a severe global energy crisis due to Tehran's near-shuttering of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for 20% of global oil and LNG transit. This disruption caused the largest energy flow crisis in history, evidenced by a 55% spike in oil prices and significant rationing measures worldwide. Strategically, the incident highlights the extreme vulnerability of global supply chains to geopolitical instability in the Middle East. Policymakers must urgently prioritize diversifying energy routes and strengthening regional security cooperation to mitigate future shock risks.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  460. 460.
    2026-04-06 | middle_east | 2026-W15 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The escalating conflict, marked by Iranian missile and drone attacks on critical infrastructure in the Gulf, has severely impacted regional stability. Key evidence includes national energy companies in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Qatar declaring force majeure due to damage to oil and gas facilities. This crisis is forcing Gulf Arab states to undergo a strategic 'reckoning,' compelling leaders to reassess existing regional relationships and dependencies. Policymakers must anticipate a shift in regional power dynamics and prepare for potential realignment among Gulf partners to mitigate further escalation.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  461. 461.
    2026-04-03 | middle_east | 2026-W14 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    Lebanon is rapidly becoming a proxy front in the larger geopolitical conflict between the U.S. and Israel regarding Iran. The escalation was triggered by Hezbollah, backed by Tehran, launching attacks into Israel following a major regional event, prompting widespread Israeli airstrikes across Lebanon. This involvement has inextricably tied Lebanon's internal stability and fate to the regional war, making the country highly vulnerable to external military and political pressures. Policymakers must anticipate that Lebanon's instability will continue to be exploited by external actors, complicating any potential diplomatic or humanitarian intervention.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  462. 462.
    2026-04-03 | middle_east | 2026-W14 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that Iran has successfully defended its national interests against sustained military aggression from the United States and Israel. Key evidence cited includes Iran's ability to maintain political continuity and retaliate effectively, despite continuous bombing campaigns and attacks on civilian and military infrastructure. The implication for policy is that the current Western strategy of overwhelming force is failing, suggesting that a revised, non-military diplomatic or strategic approach is necessary for the conflict to conclude.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  463. 463.

    William J. Burns argues that the United States stands at a rare and consequential geopolitical inflection point, characterized by major power competition (China, Russia) and rapid technological change. He warns that the current shift toward hard-power nationalism and the erosion of established alliances and institutions is a form of "slow motion major power suicide." To maintain its global standing, the US must reject this trend and re-embrace a strategy of "enlightened self-interest." This requires blending military strength with soft power, prioritizing the rebuilding of trust among allies, and strengthening institutional cooperation to effectively play its strong hand.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  464. 464.
    2026-04-02 | middle_east | 2026-W14 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear

    The analysis posits that Iran's regional influence is escalating into a critical and multi-faceted threat, necessitating immediate policy attention. Key evidence includes Iran's established dominance through proxies across multiple Middle Eastern states (e.g., Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen), coupled with significant military advancements, including the enrichment of uranium to 60% and expanded missile manufacturing. This combination of regional coercion and advanced WMD capability creates a highly volatile environment, exacerbated by sustained conflict with Israel. Policymakers must adjust strategies to mitigate the escalating threat posed by Iran's aggressive posture and its role as a destabilizing regional power.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  465. 465.
    2026-04-02 | europe | 2026-W14 | Topics: Middle East, NATO, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that Europe possesses a significant, yet currently underutilized, strategic capacity—an 'untapped arsenal'—essential for maintaining stability in a volatile geopolitical landscape. The reasoning is drawn from recent conflicts, citing both the historical refusal of Western powers to fully defend Ukraine's skies and the current escalation of tensions in the Middle East. These events underscore Europe's growing need for strategic autonomy and self-reliance. Policy implications suggest that Europe must urgently pivot toward developing its own comprehensive defense industrial base and diplomatic capabilities to reduce reliance on external powers and manage escalating global risks.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  466. 466.
    2026-04-01 | middle_east | 2026-W14 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The analysis highlights the regime's strategy of framing internal dissent as foreign-backed conspiracies, as evidenced by Ayatollah Khamenei's rhetoric linking mass protests to 'attempted coups' orchestrated by Israel and the United States. By justifying the use of 'unprecedented violence' against these unrests, the regime is consolidating power and solidifying a narrative of existential threat. This hardening stance signals a deeper commitment to internal repression and anti-Western hostility. Strategically, this suggests that diplomatic efforts will be significantly hampered by heightened internal security concerns and increased regional instability.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  467. 467.
    2026-04-01 | middle_east | 2026-W14 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The conflict in the Persian Gulf has triggered a massive disruption to global energy supplies, representing the largest oil and LNG shock in modern history. Key evidence points to the collapse of traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, which has plummeted from 20% to a mere 5% of normal flow. While regional powers like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are attempting to reroute crude oil, these alternative pipelines are insufficient to compensate for the lost volume and remain vulnerable. Strategically, this necessitates urgent policy reassessment of global energy dependencies, suggesting a fundamental shift in how international markets manage energy security in a post-American Gulf environment.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  468. 468.
    2026-03-31 | middle_east | 2026-W14 | Topics: Middle East

    The passing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei marks a critical inflection point in Iran's political landscape, suggesting a potential shift away from the repressive status quo. While the state media framed his death as a moment of martyrdom, the article suggests that the populace is largely disillusioned after decades of repression against dissent, women, and minorities. This transition period is expected to be highly volatile, creating a power vacuum that challenges the stability of the Islamic Republic. Consequently, external powers must anticipate significant internal unrest and potential regime challenges, necessitating a strategic reassessment of diplomatic and security engagement in the region.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  469. 469.
    2026-03-31 | middle_east | 2026-W14 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The escalating U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran is triggering a major regional conflagration, posing an immediate threat to Iraq. Historically, Iraq has managed to remain outside the line of fire despite strong ties to Tehran, primarily because both the Iraqi and Iranian governments successfully discouraged the involvement of aligned militias. However, the expansion of the conflict makes Iraq highly vulnerable to instability. Policy implications suggest that the region's status quo is unsustainable, necessitating urgent strategic planning to mitigate the risk of Iraq being drawn into the fighting.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  470. 470.
    2026-03-30 | middle_east | 2026-W14 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The publication argues that Congress must reassert its constitutional authority over military operations in Iran to prevent a costly quagmire. The core reasoning is that major military decisions require debate and explicit authorization from the legislative branch, rather than being executed through unilateral executive action. By insisting on these checks and balances, Congress can ensure democratic oversight and prevent the initiation of conflict without proper legislative consent. This reassertion of power is presented as critical for maintaining constitutional governance during a major confrontation.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  471. 471.
    2026-03-30 | middle_east | 2026-W14 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Russia, United States

    One month into the US-Israeli war with Iran, policymakers assess whether the conflict represents a regional crisis or a 1973-style global economic shock. The impact depends critically on conflict duration and Iran's blockade of Hormuz fuel and cargo shipments, yet conflicting signals about negotiations persist from both sides. Experts warn of potential inflation spikes and growth cuts mirroring 1973, with severe disruptions to energy flows and supply chains affecting Europe, Russia, and China. The unclear alignment between the US and Israel on end-game objectives further complicates prospects for negotiated resolution, increasing risks to global economic stability.

    Read at Chatham House

  472. 472.
    2026-03-29 | diplomacy | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, Diplomacy

    President Ahmed al-Sharaa outlines Syria's post-Assad transition strategy, focusing on reconstruction and diplomatic re-engagement following the regime's fall in late 2024. His government seeks to reintegrate Syria into the international community after years of isolation while navigating ongoing regional volatility and the country's stance in Middle East conflicts. Al-Sharaa's vision encompasses political and economic reforms, building accountable state institutions, and establishing Syria as a stabilizing force in regional affairs. This represents a critical shift from Syria's pariah status, with significant implications for regional security dynamics and international relations normalization. Success hinges on balancing domestic governance reforms with strategic positioning within a volatile geopolitical environment.

    Read at Chatham House

  473. 473.

    China's newly approved Five-Year Plan extends its dominance in clean energy technologies—solar, wind, electric vehicles, hydrogen, and fusion—through systematic long-term strategic investment, while the Trump administration prioritizes fossil fuels and abandons international climate commitments. China's planning approach has proven highly effective, quadrupling domestic solar capacity and growing EV market share to over 50% in the past five years, while U.S. renewable investment has collapsed due to inconsistent policy reversals. Beyond energy production, China is investing in climate adaptation and disaster resilience infrastructure, while the U.S. has dismantled federal adaptation programs despite suffering $115 billion in climate damages in 2025. The strategic divergence positions China to capture a growing share of the projected doubling in global renewable energy markets over the coming years.

    Read at CFR

  474. 474.
    2026-03-29 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, Trade

    The Houthis' March 28 missile attack on Israel represents a significant escalation that reflects Iran's broader strategy of activating allied groups across the Middle East. This involvement threatens critical Red Sea shipping lanes and could trigger renewed large-scale Saudi-Houthi conflict worse than previous rounds of fighting. The escalation directly endangers Yemen's fragile peace efforts and threatens to deepen the humanitarian crisis affecting millions of civilians already facing severe food insecurity and limited healthcare access. The potential expansion of Houthi operations to target GCC infrastructure and Western military bases could dramatically increase regional instability and disrupt global energy supplies and shipping costs.

    Read at Chatham House

  475. 475.
    2026-03-29 | defense | 2026-W13 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, United States, Defense

    The Trump administration's proposed 'Golden Dome' air and missile defense system, modeled on Israel's Iron Dome, faces fundamental viability challenges exposed by Iran's recent military operations. Iran's successful penetration of Israel's AMD system through mass missile attacks and saturation tactics demonstrates that such defense networks can be overwhelmed by determined adversaries with greater capabilities than Iran, such as China or Russia. The system's cost-benefit analysis is deeply unfavorable: interceptors cost $12.7 million each while Iranian missiles cost $1-2 million, and the system's estimated $844 billion to $1.1 trillion price tag would provide minimal strategic benefit and represent a wasteful opportunity cost when resources are desperately needed elsewhere.

    Read at CATO

  476. 476.
    2026-03-28 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    President Trump has extended his pause on threatening Iran's energy infrastructure until April 6, signaling an attempt at diplomacy amidst the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. This delay has significant global economic implications, with projections of increased inflation and discussions about potentially diverting aid from Ukraine to the Middle East. Concurrently, international efforts are focused on securing shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and maintaining support for Ukraine, highlighted by a new security cooperation agreement between Saudi Arabia and Ukraine.

    Read at CFR

  477. 477.

    U.S. allies in Europe and Japan are largely declining to actively join the Iran war, signaling a shift towards strategic independence and pragmatism in their foreign policies despite U.S. pressure. European leaders cite past U.S. actions and domestic political factors for their reluctance, while Japan emphasizes constitutional constraints on military involvement, though both provide some U.S. operational support. The conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz pose severe economic threats to both regions, impacting energy security and global stability. This growing divergence in interests, coupled with waning U.S. soft power, prompts allies to hedge through diversified relationships, raising questions about the long-term cohesion of U.S. alliances.

    Read at CFR

  478. 478.
    2026-03-28 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Russia pursues a calculated strategy in the Iran-Israel conflict, acting as spectator, beneficiary, and player while avoiding direct military entanglement. Moscow provides diplomatic support and likely drone assistance to Iran while maintaining deconfliction channels with Israel and the US, extracting advantage without assuming proportional risks. Disruptions in Gulf energy markets have tightened global crude supplies, improving Russia's fiscal position and demonstrating resilience under sanctions. This selective engagement approach reinforces Moscow's narrative of indispensability across multiple theaters and strengthens its negotiating position on Ukraine. Russia's Middle East gains directly feed into the diplomatic calculus, potentially shifting US focus from weakening Russia to managing it, which could increase pressure on Kyiv to accept compromise.

    Read at Chatham House

  479. 479.
    2026-03-28 | economy | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Economy

    Since the pandemic, Americans rank affordability as their top concern, with costs for healthcare, housing, groceries, and utilities rising substantially faster than the 30.8% wage growth experienced. Healthcare costs have surged most dramatically—worker insurance contributions jumped 308% while wages rose only 119%, and median home purchase ages have jumped from 30 to 40 years as housing costs rose 28%, making homeownership unattainable for average families with median incomes of $85,000. This affordability crisis has proven electorally decisive, with recent Democratic victories centered on these bread-and-butter economic issues, and with the Iran conflict driving energy and food prices higher, the 2026 midterms will likely hinge on this issue as President Trump's inflation approval rating stands at just 34%, endangering Republican House candidates in swing districts.

    Read at Brookings

  480. 480.
    2026-03-28 | diplomacy | 2026-W13 | Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, United States, Diplomacy

    Freedom House's "Freedom in the World 2026" report indicates a severe, 20th consecutive year of global democratic decline, marked by authoritarian regimes increasingly formalizing collaboration to undermine democratic institutions worldwide. The report notes significant deteriorations in political rights and civil liberties, even in countries like the United States, alongside a global erosion of media freedom and due process. This trend is compounded by major democracies turning inward, reducing support for global democracy promotion, and facing domestic challenges to their own democratic systems. Reversing this alarming trajectory, the author suggests, necessitates close cooperation among leading democracies, a prospect currently hindered by prevailing geopolitical dynamics and foreign policy priorities.

    Read at CFR

  481. 481.
    2026-03-28 | diplomacy | 2026-W13 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Trade, Diplomacy

    President Tinubu's state visit to the UK marks Nigeria's highest-level diplomatic engagement with Britain since 1989, aimed at deepening economic partnerships and security cooperation. While Tinubu's visible foreign policy approach has achieved macroeconomic improvements—inflation falling from 30% to 15% and improved international credit ratings—these gains have not materially improved conditions for most Nigerians, who face rising poverty and food insecurity. Nigeria's trade with the UK (£8.1 billion annually) remains modest compared to China (£16.5 billion), and the economy continues to be dominated by hydrocarbons without significant diversification, leaving it vulnerable to commodity shocks. The article argues that diplomatic engagement and foreign investment alone cannot address Nigeria's structural deficits in electricity, education, health, and security—ranked 6th globally on terrorism. Sustainable progress requires complementary domestic structural reforms alongside international partnerships to tackle the long-term drivers of insecurity and economic stagnation.

    Read at Chatham House

  482. 482.
    2026-03-28 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    Iran's current conflict strategy marks a significant shift towards unrestrained retaliation against the U.S. and Israel, characterized by both horizontal and vertical escalation. This involves expanding the conflict geographically to 14 countries and targeting an increasingly diverse array of sites, including civilian infrastructure, within days of the conflict's onset. This aggressive approach aims to impose severe costs and deter future attacks, already leading to dramatic intensification. The ongoing escalation threatens further regional destabilization and global market disruption if a ceasefire is not achieved.

    Read at CSIS

  483. 483.
    2026-03-28 | society | 2026-W13 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, United States, Society

    The article argues that despite public opposition and Supreme Court rulings against race-based admissions, the political Left continues employing what the author characterizes as discriminatory DEI policies to achieve racial preferences. Evidence cited includes Virginia's proposed HB 61 (mandating 42% of state contracts to minority/women-owned businesses with price-adjustment set-asides), declining Jewish enrollment at Harvard to 7% (lowest since WWII) following the 2023 Supreme Court decision, and the EU's Horizon Europe program ($100+ billion) conditioning research funding on DEI compliance. The Trump administration is pursuing legal challenges arguing these policies violate civil rights law and threaten to create a "balkanized" society with government-defined group rights.

    Read at Heritage

  484. 484.
    2026-03-28 | defense | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, NATO, Ukraine, Defense

    The Iran war underscores the growing normalization of AI-supported targeting in modern warfare, raising significant concerns about its implications. While AI tools enhance efficiency in data processing and target identification, incidents like the alleged strike on an Iranian school highlight risks such as inaccuracies from faulty data and the reduction of human judgment in critical decisions. This trend necessitates the development of clear rules for AI use in conflict to mitigate errors and prevent civilian harm, even as a binding international framework remains distant.

    Read at Chatham House

  485. 485.
    2026-03-28 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    Syria's effective foreign policy in insulating itself from regional conflicts masks the deeper risk of its unresolved internal divisions. This is highlighted by the recent Israeli airstrike in Sweida, which occurred amidst internal clashes and demonstrated how domestic instability continues to invite external intervention despite diplomatic gains. The government's reliance on external, elite-level agreements over inclusive national dialogue leaves critical issues of governance and power-sharing unaddressed. Lasting stability therefore hinges on establishing a credible and transparent national process to foster internal consensus and legitimacy, rather than solely depending on external diplomatic maneuvers.

    Read at Chatham House

  486. 486.

    Europe must undertake bold and comprehensive economic action, including accelerating decarbonization, to mitigate the severe economic consequences of the Iran war and projected prolonged energy disruptions. Learning from past energy crises, the article advocates for a new fiscal package to incentivize electrification, support European manufacturing, and ensure collective financing for Ukraine. Key policy recommendations also include establishing a true European energy union with expedited grid modernization and renewable energy deployment, moving away from ad-hoc national responses towards a unified, financially robust approach for energy security and economic stability.

    Read at CSIS

  487. 487.
    2026-03-28 | diplomacy | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, NATO, Ukraine, Diplomacy

    President Trump's military campaign against Iran, now three weeks in, is failing to secure international support despite his appeals to NATO and other allies. The US administration faces reluctance from traditional partners to participate or be drawn into the conflict, driven by concerns about regional instability, economic disruption, and the risks of Tehran's retaliatory escalation. The muted European response and lukewarm Gulf state backing complicate the broader strategic objective of reopening the Strait of Hormuz. This diplomatic isolation raises questions about US credibility and alliance cohesion precisely when the administration is simultaneously managing crises in Ukraine, Cuba, and Venezuela.

    Read at Chatham House

  488. 488.
    2026-03-28 | africa | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States, Africa

    The article argues that the administration's attempt to define 'America First' in Africa lacks coherence—promising to avoid public moralizing while publicly shaming South Africa over fabricated genocide claims and conducting spectacle-driven military strikes. The 'trade not aid' strategy is recycled from previous administrations and ignores why private investment remains scarce: security concerns, weak rule of law, and government legitimacy issues. Without addressing these fundamentals and developing a strategic vision for Africa's role by 2050, the U.S. risks losing influence to competitor powers and failing to advance genuine American interests.

    Read at CFR

  489. 489.
    2026-03-28 | diplomacy | 2026-W13 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Trade, Diplomacy

    The 2026 London conference will convene leaders to address the rapidly shifting international order, driven by US policy changes and China's growing global influence. Discussions will center on preserving essential aspects of the old order, reforming international institutions like the WTO and UN, and coordinating responses to new challenges such as environmental change and AI. The event aims to identify pathways to stability and cooperation, recognizing the increasing role of the Global South in shaping this evolving global landscape.

    Read at Chatham House

  490. 490.
    2026-03-28 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: AI, Middle East, United States

    Despite not wanting war, Gulf states (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar) now require complete Iranian regime defeat to protect their economic transformation and regional stability. Iran's campaign of missile and drone strikes intended to fracture the coalition instead unified Gulf leaders behind continued US military operations. The region's diversification strategy—pivoting from oil to become global tech and logistics hubs—depends on safety and investor confidence incompatible with ongoing Iranian threats. While direct Gulf military involvement risks escalation and political complications, these states are preparing for prolonged instability and substantial defense spending increases if Iran survives. The outcome will determine whether the Gulf achieves its development goals or remains trapped in perpetual security crises.

    Read at CFR

  491. 491.
    2026-03-28 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: China, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, United States

    The article examines whether Saudi Arabia and the UAE should shift from defensive to offensive military operations against Iran. While both nations possess advanced air forces capable of striking Iranian targets, significant risks—including Iranian retaliation against critical infrastructure, potential US military withdrawal, and severe domestic political consequences of appearing aligned with Israel—make escalation strategically perilous. The economic case for offense is compelling, as Iran's cheaper drone strategy financially exhausts defenders; however, direct military confrontation could irreversibly damage future diplomatic relations and destabilize Gulf governments facing internal security threats. The Gulf Arab states face an unsustainable dilemma: continued defense drains resources while offensive operations risk catastrophic blowback.

    Read at Chatham House

  492. 492.
    2026-03-28 | energy | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States, Energy

    Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz disrupts 20% of global oil and LNG supplies, effectively blocking maritime traffic to near-zero levels. Despite ongoing U.S. military campaigns, Iran maintains defiance with 5,000-6,000 mines and asymmetric naval capabilities, making military escorts prohibitively risky and potentially counterproductive to market confidence. Strategic petroleum reserve releases will only offset 7% of the 15-17% supply loss, while sustained market recovery requires the broader military conflict to end—a timeline neither the U.S. nor Iran controls.

    Read at Brookings

  493. 493.

    The conflict in the Middle East has intensified with targeted attacks on natural gas facilities in Iran and Qatar, causing significant disruption and threatening global energy markets. Israel initiated strikes on Iran's South Pars gas field, leading to Iranian retaliation against a Qatari LNG facility and drone attacks on Kuwaiti and Saudi energy infrastructure, which sent oil prices fluctuating. The escalation has prompted the U.S. to attempt stabilization of oil markets and Gulf nations to issue stern warnings, suggesting prolonged geopolitical and economic implications.

    Read at CFR

  494. 494.
    2026-03-28 | economy | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Economy

    The article argues that the Federal Reserve's control over market interest rates is often overstated, with market forces frequently dictating rate movements. This is evidenced by recent Treasury auctions where rates surged independently of any Fed policy changes, demonstrating the Fed's reactive rather than proactive role in setting rates. The author suggests that Congress should impose guardrails on the Fed's discretionary powers, advocating for a more objective, rule-based monetary policy to enhance accountability and align better with market conditions.

    Read at CATO

  495. 495.
    2026-03-28 | economy | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Economy

    CATO argues the Federal Reserve's defense of its Interest on Reserves (IOR) program is fundamentally flawed. The Fed claims IOR and Treasury securities are fiscal equivalents, but this week's weak Treasury auction demonstrates they are not: investors carefully price Treasurys based on inflation and duration risk, while IOR is administratively set with no market discipline. The article contends this substitution argument ignores how markets function and allows the government to monetize debt without the market signals that would otherwise discipline fiscal spending.

    Read at CATO

  496. 496.

    The Iran War's disruption of oil and LNG supplies is forcing Asian economies dependent on Middle Eastern energy to fundamentally restructure their energy strategies. Across the region, governments are accelerating nuclear energy development (Japan, China, South Korea), re-embracing coal, and exploring renewable expansion, with South Korea even considering breaching its US nuclear agreement to pursue domestic uranium enrichment. While these shifts address long-term security needs, most Asian states face significant near-term economic pain, as alternative energy sources require time to deploy and the critical Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed. The crisis reveals Asia's structural energy vulnerabilities and underscores the geopolitical risks of energy insecurity, including potential tensions with security allies and proliferation concerns.

    Read at CFR

  497. 497.

    CFR President Michael Froman argues that the US failure to build robust allied support for securing the Strait of Hormuz reflects a deeper erosion in coalition-building capacity stemming from inadequate consultation and allied perceptions that military action serves primarily US interests. Despite the Strait's critical importance—handling 40% of China's crude oil and significant European energy flows—responses from major allies ranged from outright refusal to lukewarm commitments, while China strategically abstained despite substantial vulnerability to supply disruption. The episode suggests Trump administration policies on tariffs and territorial claims have depleted the diplomatic capital necessary for allies to support US-led military operations, with significant implications for future security commitments requiring broad international participation.

    Read at CFR

  498. 498.
    2026-03-28 | defense | 2026-W13 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, United States, Defense

    The UK-Mauritius agreement to return the Chagos Archipelago grants Mauritius sovereignty while allowing the U.S. to maintain the critical Diego Garcia military base for 99 years (potentially renewable indefinitely) at no cost, securing strategic access to the Indian Ocean for operations in the Middle East and East Africa. Trump's opposition to the deal, citing national security concerns, appears rooted in geopolitical leverage disputes with UK leadership rather than genuine military vulnerabilities; experts argue the arrangement actually strengthens U.S. interests by providing legal clarity and perpetual access. Iran's March 2026 ballistic missile attack on Diego Garcia—the base's first direct targeting—demonstrates extended Iranian strike capability and validates the base's critical role in U.S. regional defense, though the agreement preserves full American operational control. The proposed framework represents a strategic win for all parties: Mauritius regains sovereignty, the UK resolves international legal liability, and the U.S. secures cost-free long-term access to a strategically vital facility.

    Read at CFR

  499. 499.
    2026-03-28 | diplomacy | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States, Diplomacy

    UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's cautious response to the Iran war initially aligned with British public opinion (59% opposition to the conflict), generating domestic political support but triggering friction with an unpredictable Trump administration. While Starmer's decision to deny US military base access reflected public sentiment, he later made gradual concessions to sustain the UK-US relationship, creating a delicate balancing act between alliance obligations and domestic priorities. The prolonged conflict now threatens his two core objectives: achieving economic recovery (interest rate cuts delayed, energy and food costs rising) and maintaining strong ties with Trump, while exposing significant gaps in UK military capability and straining relations with Gulf allies and Cyprus. The article highlights a fundamental strategic dilemma for Britain: whether closer alignment with the US enables greater influence over decisions or whether maintaining distance better protects national interests, with major implications for UK autonomy and its future role in the Middle East.

    Read at Chatham House

  500. 500.
    2026-03-28 | tech | 2026-W13 | Topics: Climate, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, Technology

    The Kremlin is implementing widespread internet blackouts and censorship, extending to major cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg, to tighten its grip on Russia's digital space, citing security and national control. These measures include banning popular social media and messaging apps while promoting state-controlled alternatives, impacting daily life and suppressing protests for internet freedom. The shutdowns have caused significant economic disruption, costing local businesses millions daily and threatening small and medium-sized enterprises with bankruptcy. This aggressive digital control strategy reflects the regime's growing anxieties and will likely test the public's tolerance and potential for dissent.

    Read at Chatham House

  501. 501.
    2026-03-28 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The Trump administration has failed to deploy a humanitarian strategy for Middle East conflicts despite $11 billion in military spending and $5.4 billion in Congressional humanitarian funding available—a policy choice, not a capacity constraint. With over 1 million displaced in Lebanon and 3.2 million in Iran (potentially the largest refugee crisis of the 21st century), the humanitarian void is creating cascading global crises including food insecurity and disrupted supply chains. The author argues that unaddressed humanitarian crises historically breed extremism, mass migration, and state collapse—requiring far costlier future interventions—while humanitarian investment offers superior long-term security returns. The administration previously demonstrated rapid humanitarian response in Beirut (2020) and Jamaica (2025), proving capability. The article recommends programming available funds, establishing sanctions carve-outs for aid, creating a UN-coordinated operation center, and convening a humanitarian pledging conference.

    Read at CFR

  502. 502.

    The United States and Iran have reportedly engaged in indirect contact regarding potential negotiations, despite public denials from Tehran. This comes amid escalating military tensions, with increased U.S. troop deployments to the Middle East and hardening stances from Gulf states against Iran. The volatile situation underscores a precarious geopolitical landscape, with experts advising a strategy to manage rather than overthrow the Iranian regime.

    Read at CFR

  503. 503.
    2026-03-28 | society | 2026-W13 | Topics: China, Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States, Society

    The 70th UN Commission on the Status of Women focused on access to justice and eliminating discriminatory laws, with panelists highlighting that women globally possess only two-thirds the legal rights of men. Key barriers include widespread discriminatory legislation (affecting rape definitions, child marriage, and equal pay), fragmented justice systems inaccessible to women, and social biases that discourage reporting. The Commission adopted historic agreed conclusions for the first time requiring a vote after 70 years, establishing stronger commitments to legal aid, digital justice platforms, and survivor-centric approaches to conflict-related sexual violence, though the United States cast an unprecedented opposing vote. Speakers emphasized that implementing these agreements requires sustained political will, adequate funding for justice systems, and international accountability mechanisms to address gender-based violence and impunity.

    Read at CFR

  504. 504.
    2026-03-28 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Dr. Gorka presents the Trump administration's counterterrorism strategy, positioning Iran as the principal global sponsor of terrorist networks funding both Shia and Sunni extremist groups, and arguing that Operation Epic Fury has substantially degraded Tehran's operational capability while ideological intent persists. The strategy prioritizes information operations (IO) as foundational counterterrorism, emphasizing the need to expose regime hypocrisy and terrorist ineffectiveness to erode support, paired with emphasis on state sovereignty as essential for long-term security. Key initiatives include rebuilding counterterrorism partnerships in Iraq and Syria post-operation, strengthening capacity in the Sahel and Lake Chad regions, and conducting sustained messaging campaigns to undermine terrorist recruitment and ideology.

    Read at CFR

  505. 505.
    2026-03-28 | africa | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Africa

    African countries have largely maintained diplomatic silence and refused to align with Iran in the ongoing Iran war, disappointing Tehran's decades-long effort to build anti-Western alliances across the continent. Their cautious neutral stance reflects pragmatic calculations: protecting existing partnerships with the United States, Israel, and Gulf states; avoiding disruptions to critical oil and fertilizer supplies via the Strait of Hormuz; and preserving valuable bilateral development agreements. Iran's attempt to position itself as a theocratic alternative to Western values and leverage Shiite religious networks has largely backfired, with even traditional allies like South Africa offering only muted criticism. As Iran emerges weakened from the conflict, its capacity to pursue military, diplomatic, and religious objectives in Africa will diminish, ceding regional influence to Gulf states and the United States.

    Read at CFR

  506. 506.

    The ongoing Iran war is causing severe disruptions in global energy markets, prompting governments and companies worldwide to implement emergency policies. Nations like the Philippines have declared energy emergencies, while Slovenia and Sri Lanka have introduced fuel rationing, and major corporations are facing substantial cost increases and supply chain issues. These widespread economic impacts, including falling stock markets and projected inflation, are driving international diplomatic efforts, such as proposals for summits and peace plans, to stabilize the volatile situation.

    Read at CFR

  507. 507.
    2026-03-28 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: AI, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    President Trump initially threatened to "obliterate" Iranian energy sites but later announced a five-day pause, ostensibly due to diplomatic conversations that Iran subsequently denied. This occurs amidst escalating hostilities in the Middle East, including Israeli airstrikes in Tehran and significant cross-border attacks between Iran and Israel over the weekend, resulting in numerous casualties. Unofficial reports indicated initial peace talks were exploring conditions such as a halt to Iran's missile program and an end to military offensives. The complex situation highlights persistent diplomatic and military tensions in the region, with broader implications for global energy prices and international stability.

    Read at CFR

  508. 508.
    2026-03-28 | defense | 2026-W13 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States, Defense

    After three weeks, the air campaign in the Iran War shows a sustained U.S. strike tempo, adapted to use less expensive munitions, while Iranian drone and missile launches have significantly declined but persist, notably targeting Gulf states' energy facilities. Gulf allies report high interception rates of 80-90%, but their interceptor inventories are reportedly dwindling. The ongoing conflict signals continued regional instability, raising critical questions about Iran's remaining military capabilities and the potential for a U.S. military operation to secure the Strait of Hormuz.

    Read at CSIS

  509. 509.
    2026-03-28 | economy | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, Economy

    The US-Israel war on Iran has caused significant spikes in global energy and gas prices, threatening long-term damage to the region's energy sector and broader economy. Experts highlight the evolving energy and economic implications, including risks to energy supply, trade flows, inflation, and a broader shift towards economic fragmentation and heightened geopolitical uncertainty. Gulf economies are navigating these pressures by assessing their resilience and developing policy responses to recover within this volatile global environment.

    Read at Chatham House

  510. 510.
    2026-03-28 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East

    Prolonged Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon threatens to backfire strategically by strengthening Hezbollah rather than weakening it. The analysis argues that military presence will further destabilize Lebanon's fragile state institutions, which are already struggling to provide services and establish legitimacy after recent conflicts. While Hezbollah suffered significant losses following Israel's decapitation of its leadership in September 2024, continued Israeli military operations create conditions for the group to reconstitute as a dispersed guerrilla force and rebuild popular support, particularly among Lebanese Shia communities. The report recommends prioritizing international support to strengthen Lebanese state capacity and provide essential services, coupled with diplomatic efforts to address external Iranian support for Hezbollah, rather than relying on military occupation to achieve disarmament.

    Read at Chatham House

  511. 511.
    2026-03-28 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: AI, China, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The U.S.-Israeli war with Iran provides Russia with short-term advantages, such as increased oil revenues due to the Strait of Hormuz closure and the diversion of Western military aid from Ukraine, aiding its ongoing offensive. However, Russian elites are growing apprehensive, noting Russia's diminished global influence, exclusion from Middle East diplomacy, and the long-term strategic and economic drain of the Ukraine conflict. While U.S.-Russia relations have soured and Ukraine peace talks are paused, Putin's sustained belief in potential collaboration with the Trump administration currently prevents a more significant bilateral breakdown.

    Read at CFR

  512. 512.
    2026-03-28 | economy | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Economy

    Congress should require at least $600 billion in net deficit reduction if it uses reconciliation for new spending on the Iran war ($200 billion) and immigration enforcement, given the nation's unsustainable fiscal trajectory with federal debt projected to exceed GDP this year and reach 175% by 2056. The article identifies mandatory entitlements (Medicare and Social Security) as the primary drivers of persistent $2 trillion annual deficits, with the proposed $200 billion spending addition carrying a true cost of $287 billion including interest and indirect expenses. Multiple cost-saving reforms to Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, and tax provisions could easily exceed $1 trillion in savings, providing ample offsets. The article argues Congress should restore fiscal rules like the Conrad Rule or implement a 2:1 offset requirement to ensure reconciliation becomes a tool for fiscal discipline rather than deficit expansion, preventing the bipartisan abuse that plagued previous reconciliation efforts.

    Read at CATO

  513. 513.

    The ongoing Iran War is significantly impacting the global economy, with the World Trade Organization forecasting a 0.3 percent reduction in global GDP growth for 2026 if energy prices remain high. Regions like Europe and Gulf states, including Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, are projected to face substantial economic contractions due to prolonged conflict and disruptions to energy infrastructure, such as the recent Iranian strike on a Qatari gas facility. Policy responses include the US considering lifting sanctions on Iranian oil and approving significant arms sales to Middle Eastern allies. Diplomatic and strategic shifts are also evident in deals like Belarus's prisoner release tied to fertilizer exports and the UK's foreign aid cuts to boost military spending.

    Read at CFR

  514. 514.
    2026-03-27 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The article argues that the conflict in Iran is likely to escalate into a protracted war, potentially mirroring the dynamics of the war in Ukraine. Initial US and Israeli military actions against Iran were predicated on the assumption that a swift, decisive strike would neutralize the regime and stabilize the situation, especially given failed nuclear talks and concerns over Iran's missile arsenal. However, the analysis suggests this assumption of a quick resolution is flawed, implying that the conflict will become a complex, long-term strategic challenge requiring significant policy adjustments.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  515. 515.
    2026-03-27 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East

    The article argues that military conflict is a profoundly costly undertaking, requiring more than mere political rhetoric or public relations campaigns to justify. For the immense moral and material costs of war to be acceptable, the action must be underpinned by a clear, achievable strategy. Strategy, in this context, is defined as a concrete plan by which military power can reliably produce a desired political outcome. The core finding is that any intervention lacking strategic coherence risks escalating costs and failing to achieve its stated goals. Policymakers must therefore ensure that military force is always tied to a disciplined, measurable plan to avoid strategic failure.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  516. 516.
    2026-03-27 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    Amid escalating costs, discussions of a potential cease-fire between the U.S. and Iran have emerged. The Trump administration has temporarily paused aggressive actions, such as threats against power plants, to allow for negotiation. The U.S. has submitted a 15-point plan via Pakistani intermediaries, which the article characterizes as essentially demanding unconditional surrender from Iran. This indicates that any diplomatic path toward a ceasefire is currently predicated on Iran accepting highly restrictive terms, suggesting a difficult and asymmetrical negotiation environment.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  517. 517.
    2026-03-26 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The analysis argues that conventional metrics of conflict—such as military damage or losses—are insufficient for assessing Iran's true position. Instead, the critical measure is whether Tehran is successfully achieving its long-term strategic objectives. Despite suffering significant conventional blows from adversaries, the article posits that Iran is strategically succeeding due to careful preparation and planning. Policymakers must therefore shift focus from immediate military assessments to understanding Iran's enduring strategic resilience and geopolitical aims in the region.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  518. 518.

    The analysis argues that the transatlantic relationship is strained by US unilateralism, challenging Europe's traditional posture of submission. Key evidence suggests that Europe's history of bending the knee to Washington has been detrimental, while recent acts of collective self-assertion—such as rejecting US pressure over Greenland or denying base access during the Iran crisis—have proven more effective. For policy, the findings imply that Europe must abandon reactive submission and instead prioritize internal cohesion, energy transition, and unified policy stances. This strategic shift is necessary for Europe to build genuine leverage and reduce its structural dependence on US protection.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  519. 519.

    The report argues that the U.S. Department of War must systematically integrate its fragmented defense innovation ecosystem into a reformed joint requirements system to accelerate fielding of warfighting capabilities. Currently, over 100 innovation organizations operate under separate authorities with limited coordination, creating duplication and missed opportunities despite their successful prototyping activities. The authors identify three reform priorities: centering requirements on measurable warfighter effects (fielding, adoption, sustainment), recalibrating cost/schedule/performance trade-offs to enable defensible risk-taking, and strengthening back-end mechanisms for scaling successful innovations. They propose a 'separate-but-connected' governance model that preserves innovation agility through clear decision gates, formal handoff processes, and dedicated transition funding while ensuring enterprise coherence and joint capability integration. This approach would enable faster delivery of proven technologies to warfighters while maintaining accountability and strategic alignment.

    Read at RAND

  520. 520.
    2026-03-25 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that the concept of 'authoritarian stability' in the Middle East is a myth, suggesting that regional regimes are inherently volatile and subject to external manipulation. The analysis uses Donald Trump's contradictory statements regarding Iran and his comparison of regime changes (e.g., Venezuela) as evidence that major powers view the region through a lens of transactional autocracy replacement. This suggests that external interventions are less about promoting stability and more about managing the transition from one powerful regime to another. Policymakers must therefore anticipate instability and the continued use of proxy conflicts, rather than assuming predictable, stable governance structures.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  521. 521.

    RAND research identifies critical gaps in U.S. Air Force combat sortie generation proficiency—the ability to rapidly recover, refuel, rearm, and launch aircraft under combat conditions. Through expert interviews, literature review, and proficiency modeling, the authors find that current training practices vary inconsistently across units and fall far short of what Agile Combat Employment doctrine demands, particularly for rapid response to high-threat missile scenarios. Key barriers include lack of standardized training requirements, insufficient training frequency (units practicing hot integrated combat turns semi-annually when monthly or more is needed), resource constraints, personnel shortages, and organizational friction between operations and maintenance. The report recommends establishing formal CSG training requirements (similar to the Ready Aircrew Program), implementing standardized proficiency metrics, improving operational-maintenance coordination to resolve conflicts with flying hour programs, and addressing long-term personnel experience imbalances. Without systematic intervention, the Air Force will struggle to generate combat power at the speed and scale required for peer conflict.

    Read at RAND

  522. 522.
    2026-03-24 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    Following the elimination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, the threat of Iranian instability has escalated significantly. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force has issued explicit warnings, suggesting that the region will no longer be safe for adversaries. This heightened rhetoric is coupled with reports of operatives acting at Iran’s behest being tied to various plots. Policymakers must treat the current environment as one of extreme alert, anticipating increased proxy-driven terrorism and instability across the region.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  523. 523.
    2026-03-23 | middle_east | 2026-W13 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that U.S. involvement in the conflict with Iran, despite initial differences from past wars, is setting the stage for a strategic quagmire. The core concern is that Washington is engaging a regional power without establishing clear objectives, a defined theory of victory, or a viable exit strategy. This lack of strategic clarity suggests that the U.S. risks becoming entangled in a protracted and difficult conflict. Policymakers must recognize this pattern to avoid repeating the mistakes of previous, ill-defined foreign interventions.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  524. 524.
    2026-03-20 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East

    The article introduces a stark dichotomy within the Middle East, contrasting two distinct national models. The first country is characterized by high economic productivity ($80,000 GDP per capita), advanced technology, and support for liberal democracy. Conversely, the second country exhibits signs of stagnation, marked by high unemployment and low-skill, low-paying jobs, with a GDP per capita less than half that of its counterpart. This significant divergence suggests that regional stability and future development trajectories are highly dependent on economic modernization and institutional strength, making the distinction critical for strategic policy planning.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  525. 525.
    2026-03-20 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    Contrary to U.S. and Israeli predictions of collapse, Iran views the conflict as a strategic opportunity to consolidate its regime's power and restore regional deterrence. The regime is leveraging the war to bolster domestic legitimacy, transforming internal dissent into a 'rally-around-the-flag' martyrdom culture, mirroring historical precedents like the Iran-Iraq War. Strategically, Iran has shifted toward raw offense, evidenced by closing the Strait of Hormuz and threatening multiple choke points. Policymakers must recognize that Tehran perceives the conflict as having few rules, suggesting that continued military action risks rapid, unpredictable escalation and a severe global economic crisis.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  526. 526.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    F. Gregory Gause III argues that Saudi Crown Prince MBS has shifted from an aggressive, interventionist foreign policy to one emphasizing regional stability after Iran's 2019 strike on Saudi oil facilities and the lack of U.S. response. Saudi Arabia now prioritizes economic modernization (Vision 2030), opposes U.S. military action against Iran for fear of retaliatory strikes on Gulf infrastructure, and has raised the cost of Israeli normalization by demanding a pathway to Palestinian statehood. The analysis highlights a growing Saudi-Emirati divergence over whether to back central governments or non-state actors, while Riyadh continues to view Washington—not Beijing—as its primary security and technology partner, particularly in AI and defense.

    Read at CFR

  527. 527.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    GCC states are increasingly embracing 'hard power' and diversifying security partnerships as trust in US security guarantees collapses following military escalations with Iran and the perceived flaws of the Trump administration’s Gaza peace plan. While Gulf nations initially supported US initiatives to maintain diplomatic favor, the plan’s exclusion of Palestinian political agency and its failure to prevent Iranian retaliatory strikes against GCC territory have exposed critical strategic vulnerabilities. These developments have demonstrated the high cost of dependency on a US policy that fails to constrain Israeli actions or ensure regional safety. Consequently, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar are transitioning toward more autonomous defense strategies and broader international coalitions to navigate worsening regional volatility.

    Read at Chatham House

  528. 528.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Middle East, Trade

    The conflict between the US, Israel, and Iran has escalated into a significant maritime crisis, centered on Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the subsequent disruption of Indian Ocean trade routes. Iran is employing asymmetric tactics, including coastal missile strikes and GPS jamming, to impose risks on shipping even as the US increases seizures of vessels linked to illicit trade. This environment of navigation interference and 'dark' shipping is driving traffic toward the Cape of Good Hope, resulting in higher costs and increased exposure to piracy.

    Read at Chatham House

  529. 529.
    2026-03-19 | africa | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    This CSIS report argues that the U.S. must prioritize its mineral supply relationship with South Africa despite recent diplomatic friction to avoid losing strategic access to China and Russia. South Africa remains the dominant supplier of platinum group metals, chromium, and military-grade vanadium, which are indispensable for U.S. defense systems, semiconductor manufacturing, and reindustrialization. To counter the migration of processing capacity to China, the report recommends U.S. investment in South African energy infrastructure through LNG-to-power agreements and renewed nuclear cooperation. Establishing price floors for defense materials and pairing financing with long-term offtake agreements are seen as essential steps to securing these critical supply chains.

    Read at CSIS

  530. 530.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    UAE diplomatic adviser Anwar Gargash details the impact of Iran's missile and drone campaign against Gulf states, revealing that the UAE has been struck by over 2,000 projectiles targeting civilian infrastructure rather than the U.S. military facilities Iran claims. Gargash argues Iran's strategy is counterproductive, as it has shattered trust with traditional Gulf mediators like Oman and Qatar, exposed the reality of Iran's threat capabilities, and will paradoxically strengthen Israel's role and the U.S. defense relationship in the Gulf for decades. He calls for any postwar settlement to include enforceable guarantees against both Iran's nuclear program and its missile and drone arsenal, while signaling UAE willingness to join an international coalition to secure the Strait of Hormuz.

    Read at CFR

  531. 531.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The U.S.-Israeli military campaign in Iran is cascading into a global humanitarian crisis by disrupting the Dubai-based International Humanitarian City logistics hub, spiking oil prices toward $150/barrel, and straining fertilizer supply chains routed through the Strait of Hormuz. These compounding shocks—alongside dollar appreciation making imported food staples unaffordable—are driving up operational costs for aid organizations already underfunded after U.S. cuts to UNHCR, while displacement in the region could exceed tens of millions if even a fraction of Iran's 90 million population flees. The author urges the Trump administration to immediately release $5.5 billion in congressionally appropriated humanitarian funds and follow with supplemental funding, warning that without rapid action the convergence of logistics gridlock, energy shocks, and mass displacement will push vulnerable populations from emergency into famine.

    Read at CFR

  532. 532.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    Saudi Arabia adopts a cautious and measured approach to the conflict with Iran, prioritizing its domestic economic and societal transformation over direct military escalation despite repeated Iranian provocations. While the Kingdom possesses the military capability to respond, it recognizes Iran's escalation dominance over vulnerable energy and desalination infrastructure, which makes the risk of a grinding war of attrition unacceptable. This stance suggests that Saudi Arabia will focus on securing more explicit defense commitments from the United States while remaining skeptical that the current conflict will lead to long-term regional stability or rapid normalization with Israel.

    Read at CSIS

  533. 533.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Six CFR fellows assess the geoeconomic fallout from the U.S.-Israeli war in Iran, arguing that disruption to the Strait of Hormuz has triggered the largest oil supply shock in history, with Brent crude surging above $100/barrel and roughly 10 million barrels per day taken off the market. The cascading effects extend well beyond energy: global fertilizer exports, food security for import-dependent Gulf states, and commercial data center infrastructure (including Amazon facilities in the UAE) have all been hit, while central banks face stagflationary pressures that complicate monetary policy. The analysis concludes that Washington has no easy options—strategic reserve releases and eased Russia sanctions have proven insufficient—leaving policymakers to choose between difficult concessions to Tehran or further military escalation, while also reconsidering the wisdom of concentrating critical AI infrastructure in volatile regions.

    Read at CFR

  534. 534.
    2026-03-19 | society | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that the US government is committing a $1 billion fraud by collecting immigration fees for services it has no intention of providing due to broad nationality-based bans. This claim is based on recent executive and departmental policies that freeze visa processing and benefit adjudications for citizens of up to 92 countries, often without statutory authority or prior notification to applicants. The author highlights that these measures disproportionately affect millions of legal applicants and calls for Congressional action to mandate fair adjudication and transparency in the immigration system.

    Read at CATO

  535. 535.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    A CFR expert panel analyzes the geoeconomic fallout from the Iran war, which has produced what the IEA calls the largest oil supply disruption in history, with flows through the Strait of Hormuz reduced to a trickle and crude prices surging past $100/barrel. Panelists argue the Trump administration underestimated Iran's willingness to escalate by closing the strait after its leadership was targeted, and that neither strategic petroleum reserve releases nor eased Russia sanctions have meaningfully stabilized markets, with potential GDP contractions of up to 14% in Qatar/Kuwait and recessionary risks for the U.S. if the crisis persists. The disruption is reshaping Gulf security dynamics—driving GCC states toward defense diversification away from sole U.S. reliance—while delivering a financial windfall to Russia, validating China's energy stockpiling strategy, and threatening Saudi Vision 2030 and UAE hub ambitions, with no assured resolution short of Iran agreeing to a ceasefire.

    Read at CFR

  536. 536.

    This CFR podcast examines how the war in Ukraine is sustained by competing alliance networks: NATO and European allies backing Ukraine, while Russia draws critical support from China (economic and technological), Iran (drones), and North Korea (troops and munitions). The analysis highlights that neither coalition is a traditional bloc alliance—China carefully avoids direct weapons transfers to protect its economy and reputation, while the U.S. under Trump has shifted from alliance leader to self-styled neutral mediator with a pro-Russia lean, forcing Europeans to dramatically increase their own defense commitments. The episode argues that the global order is moving toward more transactional, fragile partnerships rather than values-based alliances, creating a less stable and more unpredictable security environment than even the Cold War's rigid bipolarity.

    Read at CFR

  537. 537.
    2026-03-19 | china_indopacific | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States

    China’s 15th Five-Year Plan (2026–2030) prioritizes clean energy expansion and economic resilience over specific emission reduction targets, signaling a strategic pivot toward technological supremacy. The blueprint emphasizes dominating global green tech production to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities, particularly those exposed by the Iran war and other geopolitical instabilities. Consequently, China is increasingly integrating its climate ambitions with broader foreign policy goals, leveraging its lead in clean technology to reshape international energy markets and challenge Western industrial competitiveness.

    Read at Chatham House

  538. 538.

    Following the Supreme Court's rejection of IEEPA-based reciprocal tariffs, the U.S. is pivoting to Section 122 and 301 authorities to maintain a high-tariff regime that is increasingly used for non-trade geopolitical leverage. Experts suggest that while the administration has secured several asymmetric bilateral deals, this unilateralist approach risks fragmenting global trade and isolating the U.S. from the allies needed to counter China's systemic industrial overcapacity. The panel highlights that China's growing trade surplus and manufacturing dominance remain unresolved by current protectionist measures or the existing WTO framework. Consequently, U.S. strategy may be drifting toward a 'Fortress America' posture that increases domestic costs while ceding influence over future global trade rules and market opportunities.

    Read at CFR

  539. 539.
    2026-03-19 | americas | 2026-W12 | Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Bob Rae asserts that Canada is undergoing a profound strategic pivot, moving away from traditional reliance on the United States in response to a 'rupture' in the rules-based international order. This shift is evidenced by Canada’s commitment to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2035 and the launch of its first-ever Defence Industrial Strategy to protect manufacturing and scientific capacity. The primary implication is that Canada will increasingly prioritize multilateral partnerships with Europe and the Asia-Pacific to safeguard its sovereignty, particularly regarding Arctic security and Ukraine, amidst growing US isolationism and volatility.

    Read at Chatham House

  540. 540.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The article contends that a U.S. ground invasion of Iran would be a catastrophic undertaking, dwarfing the scale of the Iraq and Vietnam wars due to Iran’s punishing mountainous terrain and dense urban centers. Achieving total surrender would realistically require up to 1.6 million troops, a mobilization that would compromise other global security commitments and likely necessitate a military draft. The author highlights that Iranian "mosaic" defensive strategies and regional militias would trigger a prolonged insurgency while allowing rivals like Russia and China to exploit American overextension. Consequently, the analysis advocates for immediate de-escalation to avoid a strategic quagmire and preserve U.S. military readiness.

    Read at CATO

  541. 541.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    This CFR panel examines the U.S.-Israel military campaign against Iran launched in late February 2026, exploring how decades of Iranian nuclear ambition, proxy warfare, and the regime's brutal suppression of domestic protests converged to trigger the strikes. Panelists note that Iran's selection of Mojtaba Khamenei as supreme leader signals hardline continuity rather than reform, while the opposition remains fragmented and outgunned by the IRGC. The war has exposed Iran's lack of reliable great-power allies, as neither Russia nor China intervened meaningfully, and has severely degraded Iranian military and proxy capabilities including Hezbollah. However, experts warn that the Trump administration lacked adequate planning for day-after scenarios, civilian evacuations, and energy market disruption, and that a weakened but surviving regime could become more repressive domestically while periodically requiring future military action to prevent rearmament.

    Read at CFR

  542. 542.

    Fifteen years after the Fukushima disaster, Japan is reintegrating nuclear power into its energy mix to bolster energy security and meet decarbonization targets. The shift, codified in the 2025 Strategic Energy Plan, aims to reduce the country’s precarious over-reliance on imported natural gas, which exposed Japan to significant geopolitical risks following conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East. While supported by extensive safety reforms and the strategic need to compete with China’s nuclear expansion, the policy must still navigate persistent public skepticism. Success will require a flexible approach that balances nuclear restarts with diversified energy sourcing to ensure long-term stability.

    Read at CFR

  543. 543.

    This CFR roundtable examines the global energy crisis triggered by Iran's effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which threatens to remove roughly 20 million barrels per day—about 20% of global petroleum consumption—dwarfing the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo's 7% disruption. Despite the largest-ever coordinated IEA reserve release of 400 million barrels, aging SPR infrastructure limits actual throughput to a fraction of the shortfall, and alternative pipelines from Saudi Arabia and the UAE can only partially compensate. The discussion highlights that oil prices remain lower than expected only because markets anticipate a quick resolution, while Russia and Iran are paradoxically profiting from the crisis, and China's long-term electrification strategy is being validated as a model of energy security planning.

    Read at CFR

  544. 544.
    2026-03-19 | energy | 2026-W12 | Topics: Climate, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The article argues that structural domestic factors, rather than just the US-Israeli war with Iran, are driving a long-term increase in US energy prices. Rising demand from data centers and expanded LNG exports are clashing with a tightening supply as the Trump administration rolls back low-cost renewable energy incentives and faces higher extraction costs from expensive gas basins. Consequently, American consumers are likely to experience significantly higher electricity and fuel costs, a trend exacerbated by deregulation and the removal of efficiency standards.

    Read at Chatham House

  545. 545.
    2026-03-19 | china_indopacific | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    This CFR podcast examines President Nixon's historic 1972 visit to China, arguing it was a strategically consequential move that exploited the Sino-Soviet split to give the United States leverage over Moscow, reduced Chinese support for North Vietnam, and began a fundamental shift in American attitudes toward China from ideological adversary to potential partner. Historian Jeremi Suri highlights that the opening was possible because both sides had converging interests—Nixon sought to outmaneuver the Soviet Union while Mao faced border tensions with Moscow and domestic instability from the Cultural Revolution—and was executed through extraordinary White House secrecy bypassing the State Department. The episode draws lessons for today: the U.S. benefits from engaging adversaries diplomatically rather than relying on non-recognition, but the costs of excluding career diplomats and allied governments from the process—as seen in Japan's shock at the announcement—underscore that dramatic personal diplomacy without institutional follow-through can delay substantive outcomes and damage alliances.

    Read at CFR

  546. 546.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    President Trump is calling for an international coalition, including NATO allies and Asian partners, to militarily secure the Strait of Hormuz as the conflict with Iran enters its third week. The push follows unsuccessful U.S. strikes on Iran's Kharg Island and subsequent Iranian retaliatory attacks on Saudi and UAE energy infrastructure, which have collectively sparked a global energy crisis. By linking ally participation to the future of NATO, the administration is signaling a high-stakes strategy to internationalize the military burden while allies remain cautious about further escalation.

    Read at CFR

  547. 547.
    2026-03-19 | defense | 2026-W12 | Topics: AI, China, Cybersecurity, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The Trump administration's new cyber strategy is dangerously inadequate, offering only four pages of substance while failing to even mention China, Iran, Russia, or North Korea as threats despite escalating cyber operations from these adversaries. The strategy privileges offensive capabilities over defense and deregulation over minimum security standards, yet U.S. Cyber Command lacks sufficient forces and experienced leadership, key diplomatic and civilian cyber offices have been gutted, and no framework exists for the private-sector offensive operations it envisions. The resulting gap between the administration's rhetoric of cyber dominance and its actual institutional capacity leaves U.S. critical infrastructure increasingly exposed to nation-state intrusions and ransomware at a moment when military operations abroad are generating new asymmetric retaliation risks.

    Read at CFR

  548. 548.
    2026-03-19 | diplomacy | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Taiwan, United States

    The article highlights two central lessons from the history of U.S. foreign policy: the frequent occurrence of unforeseen global shifts and the persistent overestimation of military power's ability to achieve political goals. Drawing on examples from the Cold War to recent interventions in the Middle East, it illustrates how strategic expectations are often dashed by the resilience of local actors and the unpredictability of international alliances. The findings suggest that U.S. strategy should shift toward humility and pragmatism, acknowledging the limits of power and the inherent uncertainty of global events to better adapt to a changing world.

    Read at CFR

  549. 549.
    2026-03-19 | economy | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    William A. Reinsch argues that the global economy is facing extreme uncertainty driven by erratic U.S. tariff policies and the economic fallout from a conflict in the Middle East. The war has disrupted approximately 20% of global oil and gas supplies, leading to price spikes and threatening essential manufacturing supply chains in Asia and the West. The author contends that the administration's tactical, 'rinse and repeat' approach lacks a coherent strategy to address these interconnected crises. Consequently, the resulting climate of unpredictability discourages investment and risks a significant global economic slowdown as the fragility of key energy-producing regions is exposed.

    Read at CSIS

  550. 550.
    2026-03-19 | china_indopacific | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The war between the US and Iran is prompting Indo-Pacific allies—Japan, South Korea, and the Philippines—to pursue deeper trilateral security cooperation to compensate for the sudden withdrawal of American military assets from the region. Recent redeployments of missile defense systems and Marines to the Middle East have highlighted the risks of over-reliance on US commitments, particularly as regional threats from China and North Korea persist. To mitigate this uncertainty, the article advocates for a formal trilateral arrangement to enhance military interoperability, intelligence sharing, and regional stability independent of shifting US defense priorities.

    Read at Chatham House

  551. 551.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East

    The article analyzes the resilience and adaptation of Iran’s “axis of resistance” amid unprecedented US and Israeli efforts to dismantle the network and target Tehran directly. While the June 2025 conflict marked a shift toward direct Iranian action, proxy groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis continue to survive and evolve despite sustained decapitation campaigns. The persistence of these actors implies that current containment strategies are failing to fully degrade the network, requiring a fundamental reassessment of security policies in the Middle East.

    Read at Chatham House

  552. 552.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Israel's targeted killing of top Iranian security and military officials Ali Larijani and Gholam Reza Soleimani marks a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict, potentially destabilizing Iran's command structure. This military action occurs as the United States faces increasing isolation from NATO allies, who have rejected calls to join a naval coalition in the Strait of Hormuz to avoid direct involvement in the war. Consequently, while Israel and the U.S. have successfully degraded certain Iranian capabilities, the strategy’s success hinges on whether these leadership losses will trigger a popular uprising or simply lead to a bureaucratic reorganization within a resilient Iranian cadre.

    Read at CFR

  553. 553.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent resigned in protest against the war in Iran, asserting that the conflict lacks an imminent threat justification and fails to serve American interests. This internal rupture coincides with escalating Israeli military operations against Iranian leadership and growing friction between the U.S. and NATO allies over maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz. The ongoing conflict is triggering global repercussions, including an energy crisis that has forced nations like Sri Lanka to implement austerity measures. These developments suggest a deepening isolation of U.S. foreign policy and a heightening risk of a broader, uncoordinated regional war with significant economic fallout.

    Read at CFR

  554. 554.

    The article argues that the convergence of low-cost drone technology and precision guidance has ushered in an era of 'precise mass' warfare, first demonstrated in Ukraine and now fully manifest in the U.S.-Iran conflict surrounding Operation Epic Fury. The authors highlight a critical cost-exchange imbalance: defending against $20,000-$50,000 Shahed-136 drones requires interceptors costing $125,000 to $4 million each, rapidly depleting limited air defense stockpiles across the Gulf states and potentially drawing down Indo-Pacific reserves needed to deter China. The implications are stark—the U.S. must dramatically increase investment in attritable, scalable systems like LUCAS beyond the current 0.5% of defense spending, as precise mass capabilities are becoming a permanent feature of modern warfare that empowers both great powers and lesser states alike.

    Read at CFR

  555. 555.

    The article argues that despite the United States' shift toward aggressive protectionism and abandonment of multilateral leadership, the remaining 165 WTO members can and should continue global trade liberalization independently. By adopting a WTO-based plurilateral approach and moving away from strict consensus decision-making, these nations can address 21st-century challenges like digital trade while bypassing American commercial recalcitrance. Evidence suggests that global supply chains are already reconfiguring through 'trade deflection' and new non-US agreements, proving that international trade can persist without the U.S. at its center. Ultimately, collective action within the WTO framework is necessary to prevent global economic fragmentation and to maintain the rule-based system until the U.S. returns to a cooperative role.

    Read at CATO

  556. 556.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    A U.S. military investigation reveals that outdated targeting data led to a Tomahawk missile strike on an Iranian elementary school, resulting in at least 175 civilian deaths at the onset of the war. This tragedy highlights the impact of a 90 percent reduction in specialized Pentagon teams dedicated to minimizing civilian casualties during military operations. The mounting human toll and associated global energy disruptions are shifting the conflict toward a prolonged struggle of political endurance, while complicating U.S. diplomatic relations with key allies like Spain.

    Read at CFR

  557. 557.
    2026-03-19 | economy | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    The article argues that the reported move to waive the Jones Act underscores how the 1920 law structurally inflates domestic transportation costs and restricts supply chain flexibility, particularly for energy and fertilizer. By limiting domestic shipping to a tiny, expensive fleet of US-built vessels, the act forces inefficient workarounds and increases reliance on foreign energy imports rather than domestic resources. The author contends that while a waiver would not single-handedly slash fuel prices, it would enhance competition and capacity in a stressed market. Ultimately, the frequent need to suspend the law during emergencies suggests that its permanent removal would better serve long-term economic and national security interests.

    Read at CATO

  558. 558.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    This analysis evaluates the U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran, contending that significant military successes in degrading nuclear and missile capabilities have not yet triggered the regime's collapse. Key indicators, such as the stable succession of Mojtaba Khamenei and the lack of military defections, suggest that the theocracy is consolidating into a 'rump state' capable of sustained regional disruption against Gulf energy infrastructure. The authors warn that an exit strategy focused solely on conventional degradation may leave a bloodied regime with even greater incentives to pursue nuclear weapons as an ultimate deterrent, potentially turning tactical victories into a long-term strategic liability.

    Read at Brookings

  559. 559.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Iran’s new leadership has committed to continuing the conflict, emphasizing ongoing pressure on the Strait of Hormuz and further retaliation against U.S.-Israeli strikes. This defiant stance is met with a similar pledge from Washington to advance military operations, indicating that both sides are preparing for an escalation rather than a diplomatic resolution. The ongoing hostilities have already caused significant global energy shocks, forcing the U.S. to adjust sanctions on other oil producers like Russia to stabilize markets. For regional strategy, these developments suggest a protracted war with high risks of expanded conflict and long-term economic disruption.

    Read at CFR

  560. 560.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, United States

    Historian Stephen Kotkin argues that authoritarian regimes, while appearing formidable, possess inherent structural vulnerabilities that can be exploited. His analysis, drawing on historical precedents and observations of regimes like Iran, suggests that the mechanisms used by strongmen to maintain power also create points of instability. Consequently, the prospect of rapid regime change through military intervention is highly complex and unlikely to proceed smoothly. Policymakers must therefore understand the deep structural weaknesses of these regimes rather than relying on assumptions of quick collapse.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  561. 561.

    Finnish President Alexander Stubb argues that a more flexible and differentiated model of European integration is essential for the continent to remain resilient and competitive amid rising geopolitical tensions. He emphasizes the need for pragmatic mechanisms that allow member states to respond rapidly to challenges in defense, energy, and technology without losing their shared sense of purpose. Ultimately, this approach is presented as a way to strengthen the European Union's collective ability to protect its interests and values in an era of shifting global alliances.

    Read at Chatham House

  562. 562.
    2026-03-19 | americas | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, Russia, Trade

    President Lula’s diplomatic ambiguity following the US capture of Nicolás Maduro is jeopardizing his reelection prospects and Brazil’s regional standing as Washington asserts hemispheric dominance. While Lula condemned the US raid as an affront to sovereignty, a majority of the Brazilian public supports the operation, allowing political opponents to frame his stance as a defense of authoritarianism. Consequently, Brazil risks being sidelined by US President Trump’s aggressive regional agenda or overwhelmed by potential instability and refugee flows if the Venezuelan transition fails. This strategic bind suggests that maintaining a neutral path without a clear pivot toward democratic principles may cost Lula his presidency and cede regional leadership to the United States.

    Read at Chatham House

  563. 563.
    2026-03-19 | europe | 2026-W12 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The 2026 Eurovision Song Contest marks a strategic shift toward transparency as organizers abandon noise-canceling technology previously used to muffle audience booing and political dissent. Driven by the Austrian broadcaster's commitment to realism, this change highlights the contest's deep fragmentation, exemplified by the withdrawal of five nations in protest of Israel's participation. The article argues that Eurovision has evolved into a primary arena where public sentiment mirrors the geopolitical tensions found in formal diplomatic institutions like the UN. For strategists, this evolution illustrates how cultural platforms are increasingly serving as visible barometers for regional polarization and the breakdown of enforced internationalism.

    Read at Chatham House

  564. 564.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The Council on Foreign Relations details the emerging postwar governance structure for Gaza, centered on the U.S.-led Board of Peace and a 15-member Palestinian Technocratic Committee (NCAG) designed to replace Hamas in daily administration. Twelve confirmed Palestinian technocrats, many with professional backgrounds in the Palestinian Authority or Gaza’s private sector, will manage essential services and infrastructure under international supervision as part of a broader twenty-point peace plan. While the initiative has secured initial funding and troop commitments from several nations, its long-term success faces significant hurdles due to the lack of formal buy-in from local stakeholders and international concerns regarding the Board’s institutional scope.

    Read at CFR

  565. 565.

    The conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran has escalated into a significant maritime confrontation in the Strait of Hormuz, threatening global oil supplies and necessitating a potential release of strategic energy reserves. Evidence of this expansion includes the U.S. destruction of Iranian mine-laying vessels and reports of attacks on commercial shipping, alongside a staggering initial war cost of $5.6 billion for Washington within the first two days. Consequently, the war is forcing a strategic pivot of U.S. missile defense assets from East Asia to the Middle East, while highlighting vulnerabilities in global interceptor supplies for other theaters like Ukraine.

    Read at CFR

  566. 566.
    2026-03-19 | china_indopacific | 2026-W12 | Topics: AI, China, Middle East, Trade, United States

    China’s 15th Five Year Plan codifies a long-term shift toward economic resilience and technological self-reliance, driven by perceived vulnerabilities in globalized supply chains and geopolitical instability like the Iran war. The strategy emphasizes 'AI Plus' initiatives and increased R&D spending to secure autonomy in semiconductors, quantum tech, and digital infrastructure. However, this transition faces significant headwinds, including record-low growth targets and a capital-intensive tech focus that struggles to absorb a highly educated workforce. Ultimately, Beijing is prioritizing national security and high-quality manufacturing over the debt-driven, rapid expansion models of the past.

    Read at Chatham House

  567. 567.
    2026-03-19 | tech | 2026-W12 | Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States

    The U.S. Congress has reauthorized the SBIR and STTR programs through 2031 via the Small Business Innovation and Economic Security Act, ending a six-month funding lapse that threatened the startup ecosystem. The legislation introduces structural reforms, such as 'strategic breakthrough awards' of up to $30 million, specifically designed to help small businesses bridge the 'valley of death' between prototype development and commercial deployment. These updates also mandate stricter due diligence regarding foreign ownership and improved data collection to ensure federal R&D investments effectively bolster the U.S. industrial base and national security. Ultimately, the reauthorization seeks to convert domestic technological innovation into long-term strategic advantages amidst rising global competition.

    Read at CSIS

  568. 568.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The article argues that Iran's long-held system of deterrence is failing, suggesting that the country has lost its strategic balance despite external provocations. Using the metaphor of maintaining momentum, the analysis posits that Iran has been losing its stability over the past three years, undermining its regional power projection. This failure implies that the calculus of deterring Iran is shifting, necessitating a reassessment of policy strategies regarding its influence and military capabilities in the Middle East.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  569. 569.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    This podcast episode analyzes the strategic shift in U.S. policy following President Trump's decision to launch a large-scale military campaign against Iran that resulted in the death of the Supreme Leader. Dalia Dassa Kaye argues that while the administration sends mixed messages, the targeting of top leadership signals an uncoordinated attempt at regime change rather than a limited strike on nuclear facilities. She warns that the lack of a viable political alternative or a clear 'day after' plan risks plunging the region into a 'Libya-style' chaotic vacuum characterized by bloody internal conflict and massive refugee flows. Furthermore, the conflict strains relations with Gulf partners who fear the fallout and provides geopolitical openings for China and Russia to exploit American military overextension.

    Read at CFR

  570. 570.
    2026-03-19 | china_indopacific | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    Prime Minister Takaichi’s visit to Washington serves as a critical test of the U.S.-Japan alliance as the Iran War forces a shift from strategic alignment to transactional demands for Middle East military support. While President Trump pressures Japan for naval escorts in the Strait of Hormuz, Takaichi is constrained by constitutional limits and is instead leveraging economic concessions, including $550 billion in U.S. investment commitments, to maintain the partnership. The outcome will determine if Japan can preserve its vital U.S. security guarantee against China while navigating the legal and political risks of entanglement in a regional conflict.

    Read at CFR

  571. 571.
    2026-03-19 | diplomacy | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban have entered a state of 'open war' following lethal cross-border airstrikes triggered by Islamabad’s claims that Kabul is harboring Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants. The escalation has resulted in significant civilian casualties and the failure of mediation efforts by regional actors like Qatar and Saudi Arabia, marking the most severe breakdown in relations since 2021. The conflict threatens to destabilize China’s regional infrastructure projects and could provide operational space for extremist groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda. Consequently, the breakdown in bilateral ties may force regional powers, including India and Russia, to recalibrate their diplomatic strategies toward the Taliban regime.

    Read at CFR

  572. 572.
    2026-03-19 | china_indopacific | 2026-W12 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's visit to Washington seeks to reinforce the U.S.-Japan alliance through $550 billion in strategic investment pledges and record-breaking defense spending. However, the partnership is being strained by new U.S. tariff offensives and the redirection of American military assets from the Indo-Pacific to address escalating conflicts in the Middle East. Tokyo faces a difficult balancing act as it navigates U.S. demands for maritime assistance in the Strait of Hormuz while attempting to maintain credible deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Ultimately, the visit highlights a growing tension where Washington-driven economic and security shocks are complicating Japan's pursuit of strategic autonomy and regional stability.

    Read at Brookings

  573. 573.
    2026-03-19 | diplomacy | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Trade

    The spring issue of Chatham House’s The World Today analyzes the 'Trump Effect,' arguing that Donald Trump's return to the U.S. presidency has fundamentally disrupted the global order through aggressive military actions and a retreat from traditional leadership. Key evidence includes the failure of Iran’s defense strategy following U.S. strikes, the capture of Venezuela’s leader, and a shift toward prioritizing economic security over global trade. These developments are forcing traditional allies like the UK and Canada to radically reassess their security dependencies and diplomatic strategies as the U.S. withdraws from its traditional global role.

    Read at Chatham House

  574. 574.
    2026-03-19 | defense | 2026-W12 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    The UK government faces a widening fiscal gap in its defense budget, threatening the implementation of its 2025 Strategic Defence Review and commitments to NATO. Despite pledges to reach a 3.5% GDP spending target, the Ministry of Defence already contends with a £17 billion equipment funding deficit and potential cuts to major land and naval programs. Failure to reconcile these gaps through increased taxation or borrowing may force the UK to either abandon its nuclear capability or cede its status as Europe’s leading military power. The forthcoming Defence Investment Plan will be the ultimate test of whether Britain can realistically sustain its global security ambitions.

    Read at Chatham House

  575. 575.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    Chatham House argues that Iran's long-standing 'forward defence' strategy has backfired, drawing the Islamic Republic into a direct and existential war with the U.S. and Israel. The systemic weakening of the 'axis of resistance'—marked by the fall of the Assad regime and significant losses for Hezbollah and Hamas—has collapsed the proxy-based shield Tehran used to avoid direct confrontation. As a result, Iran faces a severe degradation of its regional influence and must now manage a conflict on its own soil that it spent four decades trying to externalize. This strategic 'boomerang' likely necessitates a fundamental and painful reconfiguration of Iran’s national security doctrine.

    Read at Chatham House

  576. 576.
    2026-03-19 | china_indopacific | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Middle East, United States

    The article challenges the Western perception of Chinese internet users as 'mindless automatons,' arguing instead that they are 'wall dancers' who innovatively navigate the 'Great Firewall' through a mix of resistance and adaptation. It highlights how individuals—from feminist activists to tech entrepreneurs—leverage cycles of political loosening and use creative wordplay or strategic framing to maintain agency despite increasing authoritarianism. The findings suggest that policymakers should move beyond viewing China solely through a lens of national security or economic threat, instead recognizing the complex, dynamic, and often contradictory nature of its civil society.

    Read at Chatham House

  577. 577.
    2026-03-19 | americas | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Climate, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The Trump administration is executing a "maximum pressure" campaign against Cuba by choking off oil imports through naval interdictions and tariff threats against suppliers like Mexico, following the fall of the Maduro regime in Venezuela. This strategy has crippled Cuba’s power grid and essential services, pushing the island toward a potential "crash landing" as domestic legitimacy reaches an all-time low. While reports of back-channel talks between Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Castro family suggest a possible opening for a managed transition, the lack of a clear regime successor and strict U.S. legislative hurdles complicate a diplomatic exit. The situation represents a high-stakes gamble that risks a humanitarian catastrophe to force the end of communist rule.

    Read at CFR

  578. 578.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    Charles Kupchan argues that the Trump administration should pursue a strategy of neutralizing Iran's regime rather than attempting to topple it, advocating for an 'Islamic Republic 2.0' with moderate leadership and strict constraints on its nuclear, missile, and proxy capabilities. He draws on the disastrous outcomes of U.S.-led regime change in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria to warn that dismantling the Islamic Republic would likely produce state fracture, civil war, and regional instability rather than democracy. The article notes that Iran's deeply embedded security apparatus—over one million troops plus paramilitary forces—makes regime collapse unlikely through airpower alone, while arming ethnic minorities risks igniting a multi-country civil war. Kupchan recommends focusing military strikes on degrading Iran's military capability while maintaining diplomatic channels to pragmatic Iranian elites, arguing that a defanged regime, even if imperfect, is far preferable to the chaos of state collapse.

    Read at CFR

  579. 579.
    2026-03-19 | energy | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade

    The US-Israeli conflict with Iran is severely disrupting Gulf energy exports through the Strait of Hormuz, forcing major producers to rely on insufficient and vulnerable alternative pipeline routes. This disruption is straining national budgets, especially in oil-dependent Iraq, and threatening the long-term market share of Gulf LNG as Asian buyers seek more reliable suppliers. In North Africa, the crisis presents a dual reality where energy importers like Egypt face significant inflationary pressures, while exporters like Algeria benefit from higher prices. These developments underscore the strategic fragility of the Gulf's economic model and may accelerate a permanent global shift in energy trade patterns and infrastructure.

    Read at Chatham House

  580. 580.

    This Chatham House podcast discusses the deepening rift between the Pentagon and AI provider Anthropic over the company's ethical restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. The dispute, which led to the firm being labeled a 'supply chain risk,' reveals a significant gap in global AI governance and the lack of established rules for AI in modern warfare. Meanwhile, China is rapidly advancing its 'AI Plus' initiative to integrate artificial intelligence across its entire economic and military infrastructure. These developments highlight a critical need for policy frameworks that balance national security requirements with technological ethics and international competition.

    Read at Chatham House

  581. 581.
    2026-03-19 | africa | 2026-W12 | Topics: Climate, Middle East, United States

    West African foreign ministers emphasize that regional security and peacebuilding must be driven by locally-led solutions, citing the historical success of ECOMOG as a preferred model over direct foreign military intervention. They argue that regional violence is driven by a complex interplay of youth unemployment, climate change, and state collapse rather than purely religious motivations, necessitating a more nuanced international perspective. Consequently, they call for a supportive rather than direct role for the United States and a reset of relations with France. Furthermore, the ministers warn that the international community must take greater responsibility for African stability to prevent the region from becoming a safe haven for terrorist cells displaced from other global conflicts.

    Read at Chatham House

  582. 582.
    2026-03-19 | energy | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran have led to Tehran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz, cutting Gulf oil production by 10 million barrels per day and reducing strait transit to less than 10 percent of pre-war levels, causing acute energy shortages across Asia. Asian governments are resorting to fuel rationing, shortened workweeks, and costly subsidies to manage the crisis, but most countries could exhaust oil reserves within a month, while factories shutter and tourism plummets. The unsustainable fiscal burden of subsidies—already pushing Indonesia past its legal deficit cap—combined with historical precedents of fuel-price-driven unrest across South and Southeast Asia, raises the risk of severe economic contraction and political instability if the conflict persists through the summer.

    Read at CFR

  583. 583.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States

    Max Boot argues that Operation Epic Fury suffers from a critical "strategy gap," where tactical military successes—such as precision strikes on Iranian leadership—fail to achieve clear political objectives or a viable exit strategy. While the U.S. has degraded Iranian infrastructure, Tehran has successfully retaliated by closing the Strait of Hormuz and depleting American munitions stocks at an unsustainable rate. This rapid consumption of high-tech interceptors like Patriot missiles creates significant strategic vulnerabilities in other theaters, particularly regarding China and North Korea. Ultimately, the conflict underscores the limits of U.S. military power in translating tactical dominance into long-term political or economic stability.

    Read at CFR

  584. 584.
    2026-03-19 | europe | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    This discussion of Jean Monnet’s legacy argues that his 'functionalist' method of building shared sovereignty through technical cooperation remains essential for revitalizing European integration and transatlantic stability. Panelists identified modern catalysts for unity, such as digital sovereignty and AI, while advocating for a 'pragmatic federalism' where smaller coalitions move forward on defense and diplomacy to bypass current EU institutional gridlock. The findings emphasize that the European project must return to Monnet's principle of transforming specific points of friction into common goods to address contemporary geopolitical threats and internal fragmentation.

    Read at CFR

  585. 585.
    2026-03-19 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the Iran conflict's disruption of Strait of Hormuz shipping poses a severe threat not only to energy markets but to global food security and water supply. Gulf states are nearly entirely import-dependent for staple grains, and the region accounts for roughly one-quarter of global fertilizer production transiting the strait—meaning price spikes and supply shortages will cascade worldwide, particularly in vulnerable nations already facing hunger crises. Iranian strikes on desalination infrastructure further endanger water access for over 100 million people in the Gulf. Drawing parallels to the Ukraine war's lasting fertilizer market disruption, which pushed 27 million more people into poverty, the author warns that the systematic weaponization of food, water, and fertilizer could convert a regional military conflict into a global humanitarian catastrophe, especially as rising defense spending crowds out development aid.

    Read at CFR

  586. 586.
    2026-03-19 | tech | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Cybersecurity, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    The Pentagon's designation of Anthropic as a national security supply chain risk—after the company refused to drop AI safety guardrails in its military contract—represents an unprecedented and legally dubious use of authorities designed to counter foreign adversaries like Huawei and Kaspersky. The article argues this retaliation undermines U.S. credibility, noting that OpenAI's own enforcement mechanism (the right to walk away) is effectively the same leverage Anthropic tried to exercise, and that no Chinese AI firm has received such a designation even as five major Chinese models launched in a single month. The author calls on Congress to legislate clear boundaries for military AI use rather than leaving terms to ad hoc contract negotiations, and urges the defense industry to break its silence, warning that acquiescence to executive overreach sets a precedent that will eventually be turned against every contractor in the ecosystem.

    Read at CFR

  587. 587.
    2026-03-19 | china_indopacific | 2026-W12 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s visit to Washington underscores the strain on the Japan-US alliance as Japan’s oil-dependent economy suffers from US-led Middle East conflicts while facing pressure to increase defense spending. Despite significant commitments to Trump’s missile defense plans and tariff agreements, Japan remains wary of the US's long-term reliability in countering China’s regional assertiveness. Consequently, Tokyo is shifting its strategy toward greater self-reliance and the cultivation of diverse security and economic partnerships, such as with Australia and the CPTPP, to uphold a rules-based international order.

    Read at Chatham House

  588. 588.
    2026-03-19 | society | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that the FCC's threat to revoke broadcast licenses over allegedly inaccurate war reporting represents a dangerous government overreach into content regulation and free expression. Drawing on the FCC chairman's warning to broadcasters during the Iran conflict, CATO traces how outdated Supreme Court precedents (NBC v. United States, Red Lion) grant the FCC unusually broad authority to police broadcast content under a 'public interest' standard, effectively giving broadcasters 'junior varsity' First Amendment rights. The piece contends that truth emerges through open debate in the media marketplace, not government diktat, and that wartime conditions have historically been exploited to suppress dissent—from the 1798 Sedition Act to Cold War-era broadcast suppression. CATO recommends abolishing the FCC's public interest licensing framework entirely and moving to spectrum auctions, which would eliminate the legal basis for government content regulation of broadcasters.

    Read at CATO

  589. 589.
    2026-03-18 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The article argues that Iran's pattern of limited, calibrated hostilities in the region is breaking down following the US-Israel conflict. Previously, Iran restricted its attacks to proxies or US/Israeli installations; however, it has dramatically expanded the battlefield by directly targeting vital infrastructure in neighboring Gulf states. This escalation suggests a rapid deterioration of regional stability and signals a move away from controlled deterrence. Policymakers must anticipate a significantly higher risk of a full-scale regional conflagration, necessitating immediate reassessment of deterrence strategies and security cooperation.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  590. 590.
    2026-03-18 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that regime change in Iran is achievable through a high-stakes military intervention, praising the operational synergy between the US and Israeli air forces. The key reasoning presented is that the combined forces are highly competent and capable of striking various targets with minimal unintended civilian casualties. This sustained military pressure is predicted to systematically strip Iran of its remaining assets and capabilities. Consequently, the policy implication suggests that coordinated, joint military action is viewed as the most effective strategy for destabilizing the current Iranian regime.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  591. 591.
    2026-03-17 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that the sustained U.S. policy of confrontation, or 'War on Iran,' has been counterproductive and has backfired strategically. It suggests that focusing on specific political figures or inflammatory statements has been a misallocation of strategic effort, failing to achieve desired security outcomes. The analysis implies that continued escalation is detrimental to U.S. interests and regional stability. Policymakers are therefore advised to fundamentally reassess their strategy, moving away from direct conflict toward more nuanced diplomatic or economic engagement.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  592. 592.
    2026-03-16 | middle_east | 2026-W12 | Topics: Middle East, Russia, United States

    Russia is deepening its strategic alignment with Iran, formalizing a partnership aimed at resisting third-party interference. This growing axis is evidenced by the recent Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Treaty and Russia's largely non-interventionist stance during the US/Israeli attacks on Iran. This calculated inaction suggests Moscow views the conflict as an opportunity to challenge Western norms and solidify a powerful anti-Western bloc. Policymakers should anticipate increased regional instability and a more coordinated challenge to global security structures emanating from the Middle East.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  593. 593.
    2026-03-13 | middle_east | 2026-W11 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The succession of the Iranian Supreme Leader is portrayed as a forced effort to maintain continuity rather than a stable, merit-based decision. Following U.S.-Israeli strikes that severely damaged the regime's military and clerical leadership, the Assembly of Experts was compelled to select Khamenei's son, Mojtaba, out of sheer necessity. This emergency succession process underscores the profound vulnerability of the Islamic Republic's leadership structure. Strategically, this suggests that the regime remains highly fragile and susceptible to external pressure, complicating long-term regional stability.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  594. 594.
    2026-03-13 | energy | 2026-W11 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States

    Iran has developed a sophisticated arsenal of mine and missile capabilities in the Strait of Hormuz, which could be used as leverage to disrupt global oil flow and create a dangerous strategic choke point. The combination of these threats and the U.S. Navy's limited, untested mine clearance capacity makes military intervention highly risky and suboptimal. Therefore, the analysis argues that the U.S. should avoid costly escalation or attempts to clear the mines during a conflict. Instead, strategic focus must shift toward diplomatic efforts to find an 'off-ramp' from the larger war to prevent further destabilization of global energy markets.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  595. 595.
    2026-03-12 | defense | 2026-W11 | Topics: Middle East, Ukraine

    Autonomous warfare is emerging not through visible robotic armies, but through the quiet, rapid deployment of machine-executed missions, exemplified by current conflicts in eastern Ukraine and the Middle East. The core shift involves systems operating at speeds unmatched by human operators, increasingly coordinating as networked, platoon-sized units without continuous human intervention. This trend necessitates a fundamental doctrinal pivot, as military forces must adapt to command structures that assume machine-to-machine coordination. Failure to rapidly integrate these autonomous capabilities risks strategic disadvantage for any force reliant on traditional, human-centric command and control.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  596. 596.
    2026-03-12 | middle_east | 2026-W11 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The analysis concludes that even if the Iranian regime survives the current conflict greatly weakened, it will remain a significant and dangerous regional threat. This persistence is due to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which holds the true coercive power, ensuring that the regime will prioritize maintaining the status quo over radical change. The leadership succession, whether through Mojtaba Khamenei or a successor, will be driven by vengeance and resistance, guaranteeing continued instability and potential for terrorism. Strategically, this suggests that external military intervention is unlikely to achieve a swift regime collapse, necessitating a long-term strategy focused on managing persistent regional volatility.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  597. 597.
    2026-03-11 | middle_east | 2026-W11 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that Iran maintains a significant and underestimated drone advantage, evidenced by the recent deployment of US military technology. Specifically, the US Low-Cost Unmanned Combat Attack System (LUCAS) drone used in recent strikes is structurally based on Iran's own low-cost Shahed-136 model. This reliance suggests that the US military's technological edge in this domain is limited, forcing a reassessment of the threat posed by affordable, asymmetric Iranian weaponry. Policymakers must recognize that countering Iran's drone capability requires addressing the fundamental technological parity rather than simply focusing on advanced countermeasures.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  598. 598.

    The RAND report, "Strategic Cooperation on AI: Core Functions," asserts that effective international cooperation is crucial for managing the global impacts of advancing AI technologies. It identifies four core cooperative functions—research, standard-setting, monitoring, and verification—as essential for improving understanding, promoting reliable AI, and mitigating harms. By analyzing how 17 existing international organizations implement these functions, the report offers practical insights into potential institutional structures and common pitfalls. This analysis aims to inform policymakers on designing robust and adaptive strategic cooperation frameworks for AI, emphasizing the need for proactive groundwork despite technological uncertainties.

    Read at RAND

  599. 599.
    2026-03-10 | middle_east | 2026-W11 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article asserts that despite the complexity of the conflict, the military superiority of the United States and Israel is undeniable. This conclusion is drawn from recent, massive strikes since February 28, which reportedly killed Supreme Leader Khamenei and key IRGC commanders while significantly degrading Iran's missile, drone, and naval capabilities. The piece frames these actions as necessary due to the Iranian regime's history of brutality and violence against both Americans and its own populace. The implied strategic implication is that the current military pressure is aimed at dismantling the threat posed by the regime.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  600. 600.
    2026-03-09 | diplomacy | 2026-W11 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine

    The escalating military conflict between the US, Israel, and Iran introduces significant geopolitical variables that could fundamentally alter the trajectory of the war in Ukraine. Analysts suggest that a protracted US entanglement in the Middle East risks diverting critical resources and diplomatic focus away from Kyiv, potentially fracturing Western unity. Conversely, while regional instability might weaken Russia's strategic partnership with Iran, surging oil prices could provide Moscow with a vital financial cushion to sustain its offensive despite international sanctions.

    Read at Chatham House

  601. 601.
    2026-03-09 | middle_east | 2026-W11 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that Iran's 'axis of resistance' is rapidly escalating a localized conflict into a full-blown regional war. Key evidence includes Iranian-cultivated militias striking targets in Iraq and neighboring countries, followed by Hezbollah launching retaliatory attacks against Israel. This regionalization of conflict demonstrates that Iran's proxy network remains highly active despite previous setbacks. The implication for policy is that the 'axis' poses a significant and growing threat to regional stability, requiring heightened strategic vigilance from international powers.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  602. 602.

    Global military AI adoption is rapidly outstripping international efforts to establish governance, as evidenced by a significant decline in endorsements at the recent REAIM summit. With the United States and China increasingly detached from multilateral dialogues, middle powers now face the critical choice of leading the development of 'rules of the road' or allowing the technology to evolve without international guardrails. The divergence between diplomatic negotiations and the real-world deployment of AI in ongoing conflicts risks making future policy efforts irrelevant to technical and battlefield realities.

    Read at CFR

  603. 603.
    2026-03-09 | diplomacy | 2026-W11 | Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    This CFR report outlines the catastrophic collapse of U.S.-Iran relations, culminating in a massive joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign in February 2026. Following failed nuclear talks and the failure of 'maximum pressure' sanctions, the conflict escalated to direct strikes that killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and targeted Iran's nuclear and naval assets. These events have triggered immediate regional retaliation, including Iranian strikes on U.S. Gulf bases and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, presenting a severe threat to global energy stability and risking a broader regional war.

    Read at CFR

  604. 604.
    2026-03-09 | diplomacy | 2026-W11 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that the current US foreign policy is undergoing a 'postliberal' shift, moving away from adherence to the rules-based international order and toward a model rooted in raw power politics. This shift is evidenced by the revival of doctrines like the Monroe Doctrine and the emphasis on 'hardnosed realism' in the 2026 National Defense Strategy. The policy signals a preference for unilateral action and power balancing over multilateral cooperation or international norms. Policymakers should anticipate a strategic pivot that prioritizes immediate national power interests, potentially complicating traditional diplomatic alliances.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  605. 605.
    2026-03-09 | diplomacy | 2026-W11 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    This article advocates for a robust U.S. strategy to support Iranian protesters, arguing that the current unrest presents a unique opportunity to topple the Islamic Republic and strike a blow against Chinese influence. The author contends that the regime's military weakness, exposed by recent U.S. strikes, and its economic failure have emboldened the populace despite Chinese-designed internet suppression tools. To assist the uprising, the piece suggests utilizing kinetic and cyberattacks against Iran's National Information Network to restore protester communications. Successfully weakening Tehran would undermine Beijing’s regional energy access and strategic foothold in the Middle East.

    Read at Heritage

  606. 606.
    2026-03-09 | diplomacy | 2026-W11 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, United States

    The strategic rivalry between the United States and China is evolving into a comprehensive contest for global influence, technological dominance, and economic security. This competition, spanning industrial policy and defense modernization, is actively fragmenting global supply chains and forcing international actors to reassess their strategic alliances. Consequently, the trajectory of this superpower relationship will define the future of global governance and regional security, requiring policymakers to navigate a landscape where limited cooperation must be balanced against systemic confrontation.

    Read at Chatham House

  607. 607.
    2026-03-09 | diplomacy | 2026-W11 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    Ambassador Jeffrey Feltman reflects on his 2012 meeting with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, highlighting the Supreme Leader's paranoid obsession with United States 'enmity' and his conviction that America was a declining, malicious power. During the encounter, Khamenei ignored standard diplomatic topics to deliver a lengthy monologue indicting U.S. foreign policy and predicting its internal collapse, dismissing diplomatic overtures as deceptive ruses. This rigid ideological hostility drove Iran’s regional proxy warfare and nuclear ambitions, indicating that Khamenei viewed negotiations primarily as a tactical means to buy time. The reflection underscores how the Supreme Leader's unshakeable distrust shaped decades of Iranian policy, persisting through major escalations until his death in early 2026.

    Read at Brookings

  608. 608.
    2026-03-09 | diplomacy | 2026-W11 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    Iraq faces a critical threat of internal collapse as it becomes an involuntary staging ground for escalating hostilities between Iran, Israel, and the United States following the assassination of Ali Khamenei. Despite a weakened interim government, Iraqi political and religious leaders like Grand Ayatollah Sistani are striving to maintain neutrality to prevent a descent into multi-front civil conflict involving various paramilitary and ethnic groups. The country's stability is currently jeopardized by retaliatory strikes on its soil and disruptions to vital oil and electricity infrastructure. Consequently, the United States should avoid escalatory military actions within Iraq and prioritize diplomatic partnerships to preserve the country's role as a regional stabilizer.

    Read at Brookings

  609. 609.

    European leaders have responded in a fragmented manner to the uncoordinated U.S.-Israeli military strikes on Iran, revealing deep internal divisions regarding the use of force and international law. While countries like Poland and Germany offer political or conditional support, France and Southern European nations have voiced legal criticisms, highlighting a lack of unified strategic weight. The conflict underscores Europe's continued dependence on the United States even as it pursues greater autonomy through increased defense spending and independent financial support for Ukraine. Ultimately, the war in the Middle East threatens to distract Washington from the European theater and disrupt energy markets, further straining the transatlantic relationship.

    Read at CFR

  610. 610.
    2026-03-09 | defense | 2026-W11 | Topics: Middle East, Trade

    Iraq’s fragile stability is under significant strain as the escalating US-Israel-Iran war forces the country into a dangerous regional crossfire. The conflict has triggered direct military confrontations between US forces and Iran-aligned Iraqi militias, while simultaneously threatening Iraq’s energy security and oil-dependent economy. With government formation stalled following the 2025 elections, the country’s leadership faces immense pressure to maintain a neutral balancing strategy to prevent external shocks from devolving into domestic collapse.

    Read at Chatham House

  611. 611.

    Brookings experts argue that the U.S.-Israeli decapitation strike against Iran’s leadership is unlikely to trigger an immediate regime collapse, risking instead a protracted conflict and regional instability. The analysis highlights the resilience of the Islamic Republic's institutional networks and its escalatory survival strategy, which targets neighboring energy infrastructure to force diplomatic concessions. Policymakers are warned that without a coherent 'day after' plan or the integration of civilian statecraft, the intervention could lead to a 'lose-lose' scenario of state fragmentation and emboldened global adversaries.

    Read at Brookings

  612. 612.
    2026-03-09 | tech | 2026-W11 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The "AI sovereignty paradox" is defined by the tension between the U.S. government’s demand for unfettered military access to AI and the ethical safeguards maintained by private developers. This conflict, highlighted by the Pentagon’s recent standoff with Anthropic, illustrates the lack of a clear domestic regulatory framework for dual-use technologies. Internationally, middle powers are seeking digital sovereignty through localized regulations and infrastructure to reduce dependency on the dominant U.S.-Chinese "AI stack." Consequently, policymakers face the dual challenge of reconciling national security requirements with private sector safety standards while navigating a fragmented global regulatory landscape.

    Read at CFR

  613. 613.
    2026-03-09 | diplomacy | 2026-W11 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The joint U.S.-Israeli strikes against Iran and the subsequent death of Supreme Leader Khamenei have turned the Strait of Hormuz into a volatile maritime flashpoint, severely threatening global energy markets. In response to Iranian retaliation and threats of a blockade, vessel traffic through the waterway has dropped by 70%, causing Brent crude and natural gas prices to surge. While U.S. military operations have significantly degraded Iran's formal naval capacity, the continued use of asymmetric tactics like drone strikes and mine-laying forces expensive shipping diversions. This escalation highlights the fragility of regional maritime security and the immediate risk of a broader conflict disrupting essential global trade routes.

    Read at CFR

  614. 614.
    2026-03-09 | society | 2026-W11 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    The ongoing conflict with Iran significantly raises the risk of asymmetric retaliation against the U.S. homeland, encompassing lone-wolf terrorism, cyberattacks, and strikes on critical infrastructure. Historically, Tehran has utilized sleeper agents and criminal proxies for state-sponsored terrorism, suggesting that revenge for recent strikes may be deferred until high-profile events like the World Cup. However, U.S. defensive capabilities are currently strained by the Department of Homeland Security's shift toward immigration enforcement and significant workforce cuts in specialized counterintelligence units. Consequently, experts urge an immediate re-prioritization of counterterrorism resources to address these evolving unconventional security threats.

    Read at CFR

  615. 615.
    2026-03-09 | diplomacy | 2026-W11 | Topics: Middle East

    This session examines the geopolitical fallout from coordinated U.S. and Israeli military strikes on Iran, which were conducted with the explicit goal of regime change. Experts analyze Iran's retaliatory capabilities and the potential for domestic uprisings, while assessing the risks of a broader regional conflict involving additional actors. The discussion highlights the urgent need to identify de-escalation pathways to mitigate further destabilization of the Middle East.

    Read at Chatham House

  616. 616.

    The military conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran has severely disrupted energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz, threatening twenty percent of global oil and gas supplies and disproportionately impacting Asian economies. While nations like Japan are buffered by significant strategic reserves, others like India face immediate risks due to limited storage and recent shifts in import patterns. Ultimately, these supply shocks are expected to drive a temporary resurgence in coal usage for affordability while simultaneously accelerating long-term strategic investments in nuclear and renewable energy to ensure national security and reduce reliance on volatile Middle Eastern transit routes.

    Read at CFR

  617. 617.
    2026-03-09 | diplomacy | 2026-W11 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Ukraine, United States

    Brookings experts argue that the Trump administration’s military campaign against Iran lacks a coherent long-term strategy and clear objectives, shifting from nuclear containment to regime change without adequate planning for the resulting power vacuum. While conventional strikes were initially successful, the U.S. remains vulnerable to asymmetric threats like drones and faces massive logistical challenges in evacuating hundreds of thousands of citizens from the region. Analysts emphasize the need for an immediate diplomatic 'off-ramp' and a realistic plan for dealing with a weakened but still-entrenched Iranian regime to avoid prolonged regional instability.

    Read at Brookings

  618. 618.
    2026-03-09 | middle_east | 2026-W11 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that military escalation against Iran, even when targeting key leadership figures, is strategically counterproductive and may ultimately favor Tehran. Evidence from the initial U.S.-Israeli strikes during Operation Epic Fury demonstrates that the regime's resilience and operational capacity are high, as evidenced by the immediate launch of hundreds of ballistic missiles. This suggests that attempts at 'decapitation' strikes fail to limit the scope of conflict. Policymakers should therefore view direct military confrontation as highly risky, necessitating a shift toward alternative, non-escalatory strategies.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  619. 619.
    2026-03-06 | middle_east | 2026-W10 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that President Trump's choice to confront Iran has escalated into a major regional war, moving beyond simple conflict into a global crisis. Key evidence includes Iran's retaliatory missile and drone attacks targeting US bases, Israel, and Gulf states. The immediate implications are severe global disruptions, threatening oil markets, supply chains, and maritime commerce, suggesting that these escalating risks were predictable and require urgent strategic reassessment.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  620. 620.
    2026-03-06 | middle_east | 2026-W10 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article highlights a stark contrast in the domestic political and social responses to the Iran conflict between the United States and Israel. While the U.S. faces deep division among its public and politicians regarding the legality and risks of military strikes, Israel has experienced a temporary period of national unity. This difference in internal cohesion suggests that Israel's strategic calculus and capacity for decisive action are currently supported by a more unified public will than those in the American sphere. Consequently, the geopolitical landscape suggests that Israel is better positioned to sustain a focused military and political strategy following the conflict.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  621. 621.

    The joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran have triggered a major, destabilizing escalation, pushing the region toward a protracted conflagration. Experts argue that Iran's retaliatory strikes were a calculated, existential move, demonstrating a willingness to engage in a long conflict by targeting soft underbellies, such as Gulf neighbors and American assets. This strategy allows Iran to gamble that it can outlast the current U.S. political administration. For policy, the primary implication is managing the risk of regional spillover, mitigating domestic economic fallout, and navigating the highly decentralized and politically charged nature of U.S. decision-making regarding the conflict.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  622. 622.
    2026-03-05 | middle_east | 2026-W10 | Topics: China, Middle East, United States

    The article argues that while China is Iran's most important partner due to shared opposition to the Western-dominated global order, Beijing's support for Tehran is constrained by its own strategic and economic interests. Key evidence points to China's deep reliance on the Middle East for energy security, with a significant portion of its oil imports passing through the Strait of Hormuz. Consequently, China will prioritize maintaining regional stability and securing its energy supply over engaging in direct, high-risk military intervention on Iran's behalf. This suggests that China's geopolitical actions will be measured, balancing its partnership goals with its vital economic needs.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  623. 623.
    2026-03-05 | middle_east | 2026-W10 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The article analyzes a massive U.S.-led military campaign against Iran, which successfully targeted regime leadership, the IRGC, and key military assets like the navy and missile program. However, the strikes conspicuously omitted the Iranian nuclear program, highlighting it as the single, unresolved strategic threat. This suggests that while the military campaign severely degraded Iran's conventional military capacity, it failed to address the core proliferation issue. Consequently, policymakers must recognize that future strategy must pivot away from purely kinetic action and focus on containing or neutralizing the nuclear dimension of the Iranian threat.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  624. 624.
    2026-03-04 | middle_east | 2026-W10 | Topics: Middle East, NATO, United States

    The article argues that the current military cooperation between the United States and Israel constitutes a groundbreaking, truly combined military operation, marking a significant shift in global power dynamics. This unprecedented partnership, exemplified by joint campaigns in Iran, differs fundamentally from traditional U.S.-led coalitions, where the U.S. typically designs and commands the conflict. Strategically, this deep military integration suggests the formation of a powerful, permanent axis of influence. Policy implications suggest that regional rivals must account for this heightened, coordinated American-Israeli military capability as it actively reshapes the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  625. 625.
    2026-03-04 | middle_east | 2026-W10 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    Hezbollah remains a significant and active threat, having escalated conflict with Israel following regional instability. While Israel has responded with military action, the article cautions that defeating the group will be exceptionally difficult. This difficulty stems from Hezbollah's deep embedding within Lebanon, compounded by the existing dysfunction of the Lebanese military and political system. Strategically, any regional effort to neutralize Hezbollah must account for this complex internal instability, suggesting that military solutions alone will be insufficient.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  626. 626.
    2026-03-03 | middle_east | 2026-W10 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that the U.S. is pursuing escalating military confrontations with Iran, exemplified by recent joint U.S.-Israeli strikes that killed senior Iranian officials. This pattern of action is characterized by a lack of public deliberation, as strikes are launched without presenting the full strategic costs and benefits to the American populace. The key evidence points to a series of unilateral and escalating operations—including strikes in the Caribbean and Venezuela—suggesting a shift toward preemptive military engagement. Policy implications suggest that the U.S. is pursuing a high-risk, low-transparency strategy that significantly increases regional instability and the potential for unintended escalation in the Middle East.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  627. 627.
    2026-03-03 | middle_east | 2026-W10 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The analysis concludes that while recent U.S.-Israeli strikes have severely degraded Iran's military and political infrastructure, the regime is highly resilient and likely to survive the immediate conflict due to its deep institutional roots and the opposition's disunity. The article cautions that military action alone cannot achieve regime change, as the ruling elite has a history of enduring crises and maintaining control. Consequently, the U.S. must shift its strategy from confrontation to careful diplomacy. Washington must guide post-conflict dialogue to prevent the current elite from gaining power, instead setting a high bar for any negotiations that promote a genuinely inclusive and humane political transition.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  628. 628.
    2026-03-02 | middle_east | 2026-W10 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article critiques the nature of U.S. military conflict, arguing that actions—such as recent strikes on Iran—are often initiated with minimal transparency and unclear strategic objectives. Key evidence cited includes the rapid military buildup and subsequent conflict occurring despite ongoing diplomatic negotiations, coupled with a notable absence of national debate, allied consultation, or Congressional authorization. This pattern suggests that U.S. interventions may be poorly defined and lack a cohesive, publicly articulated post-conflict strategy, raising significant concerns about regional stability and predictable policy outcomes.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  629. 629.
    2026-03-01 | middle_east | 2026-W09 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The US and Israel have conducted joint military strikes against Iran for the second time in eight months, signaling a significant escalation of regional tensions. While initial strikes focused primarily on Iran's nuclear program, the most recent operation has been sweeping, targeting both Iranian leadership and broader military capabilities. This military action is compounded by high-level political rhetoric, such as Donald Trump calling for "regime change" amid domestic protests. These sustained and expanding strikes suggest a major deterioration of stability in the region, raising the risk of direct conflict escalation.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  630. 630.
    2026-02-28 | middle_east | 2026-W09 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The article posits that the Iranian regime is facing an existential crisis, accelerated by recent military escalations. Key evidence cited includes a joint U.S.-Israeli assault on Iranian military and leadership targets, followed by significant retaliatory missile and drone exchanges. The authors argue that the ultimate objective of these actions is regime toppling, suggesting that the region is moving toward internal instability and potential state collapse. Policymakers must anticipate a volatile shift in regional power dynamics and prepare for a post-Khamenei transition period.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  631. 631.
    2026-02-27 | middle_east | 2026-W09 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article posits that Donald Trump wields significant, quasi-savior status in Israel, capable of bypassing traditional political deadlocks due to his high standing among Jewish Israelis. This influence is evidenced by his overwhelmingly positive reception following his perceived role in brokering a resolution to the Gaza conflict and the release of hostages. For policy makers, this suggests that future US political engagement will be heavily influenced by personal charisma and perceived crisis management, granting US figures disproportionate leverage over Israeli domestic and foreign policy dynamics.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  632. 632.
    2026-02-27 | middle_east | 2026-W09 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that the Islamic Republic of Iran is currently at its most vulnerable point since its founding, suggesting significant internal and external pressures. Key evidence cited includes recent U.S./Israeli attacks that degraded Iran's military and nuclear capacity, coupled with widespread domestic uprisings and severe, unmanageable economic and environmental crises. These combined factors indicate that the regime's stability is severely compromised, implying that major policy shifts or coordinated international action may be necessary to fundamentally alter the political landscape of the country.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  633. 633.

    Ambassador Robert Blackwill proposes a "resolute global leadership" grand strategy that fuses superior military primacy with a muscular revitalization of the rules-based international order. He argues that recent liberal internationalism proved too passive against adversaries like China and Russia, while the transactional "Trumpism" approach dangerously abandons the alliances and moral frameworks essential to U.S. security. To restore influence, the report advocates for a significant increase in the defense budget, winning the AI technology race, and pivoting military resources to Asia to deter Chinese hegemony.

    Read at CFR

  634. 634.

    As the Russia-Ukraine war enters its fifth year, a panel of CFR experts argues that Europe must transition from emergency response to a long-term, self-reliant security and recovery architecture. The recommendations emphasize integrating Ukraine’s innovative defense industrial base into European supply chains and preparing for overt Russian provocations that may require European action independent of U.S. support. Strategically, this necessitates balancing robust military deterrence with diplomatic dialogue and modernizing humanitarian aid through agile public-private partnerships to ensure regional stability during and after the conflict.

    Read at CFR

  635. 635.
    2026-02-26 | diplomacy | 2026-W09 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    The report argues that the United States must urgently prepare for an imminent leadership transition in Iran—ranging from managed clerical continuity to an IRGC-led military takeover or total regime collapse—following recent internal uprisings and regional conflict. It highlights that while a democratic shift is unlikely in the near term, the transition will likely trigger opportunistic escalation by proxy groups and increased internal repression. Consequently, U.S. strategy should focus on maintaining a strong regional deterrent, supporting Iranian civil society's connectivity, and readying diplomatic frameworks for nuclear transparency and hostage release.

    Read at CFR

  636. 636.

    Ukraine’s trajectory from 1991 to 2026 demonstrates a persistent struggle for independence defined by Russian military aggression and a shifting international security architecture. Milestones such as the 1994 Budapest Memorandum and the 2022 invasion highlight the failure of early security guarantees, leading to a war of attrition with combined casualties reaching an estimated 1.8 million by early 2026. Recent developments indicate a pivot toward bilateral U.S.-Russia peace summits that often exclude Ukrainian representation, creating a strategic tension between continued Western military support and great-power diplomacy. Ultimately, the ongoing targeting of energy infrastructure and deadlocked negotiations suggest that Ukraine's sovereignty remains precarious despite sustained G7 and NATO commitments.

    Read at CFR

  637. 637.

    The symposium concludes that while current AI-driven investment mirrors the speculative mania of 1929, the primary systemic risk stems from a combination of high sovereign debt and potential policy errors rather than market volatility alone. Panelists noted parallels such as the democratization of finance through leverage and a growing gap between massive AI capital expenditures and realized revenues. To avoid a repeat of the Great Depression's domino effect, experts advocate for proactive financial regulation and caution that current high debt levels may limit the effectiveness of traditional crisis intervention strategies.

    Read at CFR

  638. 638.

    This CFR event centered on the documentary 'Atomic Echoes,' which examines the multi-generational human and health consequences of the 1945 atomic bombings for both Japanese survivors and American 'atomic veterans.' The discussion highlighted how historical classification and the focus on strategic deterrence often obscure the long-term trauma and radiation-related illnesses suffered by individuals on both sides of the conflict. Policy implications include the urgent need to address the erosion of international nuclear guardrails following the expiration of treaties like New START and the rising risk of inadvertent escalation. Panelists emphasized that human-centered narratives are essential for engaging the public in contemporary debates over nuclear modernization and the sole authority of the executive branch in weapon deployment.

    Read at CFR

  639. 639.
    2026-02-26 | diplomacy | 2026-W09 | Topics: Climate, Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Four years after Russia's full-scale invasion, Ukraine's grain exports remain 35% below pre-war levels due to extensive landmine contamination, destroyed irrigation infrastructure, and acute labor shortages. While Russia initially surged to dominate 22% of the global wheat market by weaponizing appropriated Ukrainian land and infrastructure, its own production is now threatened by adverse weather and a shrinking agricultural workforce. Despite a decline from the 2022 price peak, global food security remains fragile as the war continues to suppress the output of a top producer, limiting the market's ability to absorb future shocks. Strategic recovery for Ukraine necessitates rapid EU integration, modernization of decentralized export logistics, and enhanced maritime defense to secure Black Sea trade routes.

    Read at CSIS

  640. 640.

    A 6-3 U.S. Supreme Court ruling striking down tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) has created significant trade policy volatility, forcing the White House to pivot to Section 122 authorities to maintain levies. Key trading partners including India, Malaysia, and Indonesia are responding by delaying the ratification or implementation of trade deals originally negotiated under the shadow of the now-illegal tariffs. While the decision offers a temporary legal check on executive trade power, the administration's immediate recourse to alternative authorities indicates a sustained period of trade friction and damaged diplomatic leverage in future economic negotiations.

    Read at CFR

  641. 641.
    2026-02-26 | diplomacy | 2026-W09 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    This Brookings report finds that the Trump administration’s second-term China strategy has produced significant rhetoric but few measurable results after one year. Key economic indicators like manufacturing employment and industrial production remain stagnant despite high-profile investment pledges, while U.S. global standing among allies has declined sharply. In technology, inconsistent export controls and infrastructure bottlenecks are straining America’s lead in AI against a more self-sufficient Chinese ecosystem. Consequently, the administration must shift from transactional signaling to sustained policy execution and alliance rebuilding to effectively reduce strategic dependencies and counter Beijing's influence.

    Read at Brookings

  642. 642.
    2026-02-26 | society | 2026-W09 | Topics: Middle East

    The film 'The President’s Cake' examines how authoritarian power in Iraq was sustained through everyday social practices and internal control rather than through coercion alone. It highlights that regime durability often depends on the shaping of societal behavior to reinforce compliance under oppressive systems. These insights are critical for understanding contemporary Middle Eastern political trajectories, state-society relations, and the enduring legacies of authoritarian control on reform prospects.

    Read at Chatham House

  643. 643.

    Four years after Russia's invasion, the conflict has evolved into a long-term war of attrition that requires a transition from short-term aid to a generational strategy for European security. Despite significant casualties and sanctions, Russia has maintained its war effort through economic ties with China and the Global South, while Ukraine has successfully shifted toward deeper defense industrial cooperation with European partners. Experts suggest that because Russia's maximalist goals remain unchanged, Western policymakers must prepare for a multiyear struggle focused on conventional deterrence and cautious escalation management.

    Read at CSIS

  644. 644.
    2026-02-26 | defense | 2026-W09 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    As the Russia-Ukraine war enters its fifth year, the conflict has evolved into a protracted struggle characterized by stalled U.S.-led peace efforts and a strategic shift toward European leadership in military support. High-intensity fighting has resulted in over 465,000 total casualties and a projected $588 billion reconstruction cost, highlighting the severe long-term impact on regional energy infrastructure and economic stability. This transition toward a European-led 'Coalition of the Willing' reflects a pivot in great-power dynamics, suggesting that future conflicts will require sustained societal mobilization and resilient regional alliances.

    Read at CFR

  645. 645.

    President Trump’s State of the Union address prioritized domestic economic issues and immigration while framing his 'peace through strength' doctrine as a success in stabilizing global conflicts. He defended the continuation of tariffs despite judicial setbacks and highlighted the recognition of a new interim government in Venezuela as a major shift in Western Hemisphere policy. These developments suggest an administration focused on transactional diplomacy and protectionist economic measures, emphasizing increased burden-sharing from both international allies and domestic technology firms.

    Read at CFR

  646. 646.
    2026-02-26 | defense | 2026-W09 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, United States

    The United States is entering an increasingly dangerous nuclear era as Russia and China simultaneously modernize and expand their arsenals, presenting the unprecedented challenge of facing two nuclear peers. The collapse of the New START treaty has removed critical constraints on strategic forces, while regional instabilities in Iran and the Korean Peninsula further exacerbate the threat environment. These developments are placing immense strain on U.S. extended deterrence commitments and raising risks of allied nuclear proliferation. Consequently, policymakers must urgently reassess foundational assumptions regarding nuclear posture, modernization, and the integration of emerging defense technologies like the "Golden Dome" missile system.

    Read at Brookings

  647. 647.
    2026-02-26 | other | 2026-W09 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East

    Chatham House has appointed senior British diplomat Owen Jenkins as Research Director for Africa, the Middle East and North Africa, and the Asia Pacific. Jenkins brings extensive experience from the UK's Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, including roles as Director General for the Indo-Pacific and Ambassador to Indonesia. His appointment is strategically designed to enhance the institute's analysis of the evolving world order, shifting global alliances, and the rising influence of regional powers. This move integrates high-level diplomatic expertise into the institute's executive leadership to strengthen its external influence and policy impact across the Global South.

    Read at Chatham House

  648. 648.
    2026-02-26 | society | 2026-W09 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    President Trump's 2026 State of the Union address prioritized showmanship and base mobilization over addressing the concerns of swing voters or the ongoing affordability crisis. While highlighting positive economic indicators and military successes, the President doubled down on controversial immigration enforcement and tariff policies that face significant public opposition. This strategy suggests a focus on the 2026 midterms through base consolidation rather than outreach to key declining demographics like Hispanics and independents. Consequently, the administration risks further alienating moderate voters who remain primarily concerned with inflation and healthcare costs.

    Read at Brookings

  649. 649.
    2026-02-26 | society | 2026-W09 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, United States

    The Supreme Court’s ruling that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize presidential tariffs strips the administration of its most flexible geoeconomic weapon, forcing a shift toward more bureaucratic trade authorities. Experts suggest the executive branch will likely invoke Section 122 for temporary 150-day tariffs while initiating formal investigations under Sections 301 and 232 to reconstruct the previous tariff regime. This transition creates significant business uncertainty regarding potential refunds and trade agreement stability, and may paradoxically lead to a more aggressive use of alternative tools like export controls and financial sanctions.

    Read at CFR

  650. 650.

    Stephen M. Walt argues that the current American foreign policy constitutes "predatory hegemony," wherein the U.S. uses its overwhelming power to extract short-term concessions and tribute from both allies and rivals in a zero-sum manner. This aggressive shift is presented as a reaction to the perceived failures and excesses of the post-Cold War unipolar order. The reliance on tactics like tariffs and threats, rather than traditional diplomatic restraint, is fundamentally eroding America's long-term global power and stability. Consequently, the article warns that medium powers must cooperate among themselves to defend their interests and seek a more equitable partnership with the United States.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  651. 651.
    2026-02-26 | diplomacy | 2026-W09 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, United States

    Max Boot argues that the Trump administration must heed military warnings regarding the high risks of a sustained conflict with Iran, which poses far greater dangers than previous limited strikes. Key concerns include potential Iranian attacks on regional oil infrastructure, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and a critical depletion of U.S. precision-guided munitions required for other global theaters like China and Russia. Additionally, the author notes that extended naval deployments are straining military readiness while a lack of regional ally support complicates any exit strategy. Consequently, a prolonged conflict could severely weaken U.S. strategic posture and global economic stability without guaranteed regime concessions.

    Read at CFR

  652. 652.
    2026-02-26 | defense | 2026-W09 | Topics: AI, China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The war in Ukraine has inaugurated a new era of 'precise mass' warfare, characterized by the deployment of millions of low-cost autonomous drones that are reshaping the battlefield and blurring traditional front lines. Key evidence includes Ukraine's rapid production of millions of drones and the critical role of Silicon Valley firms in providing AI and satellite connectivity, which often bypasses traditional, slower defense procurement cycles. These developments imply that the U.S. and its allies must urgently adapt their defense industrial bases to prioritize both high-volume production and rapid innovation while managing the strategic risks associated with private sector control of essential military technologies.

    Read at CFR

  653. 653.

    The Supreme Court's 2026 ruling that the IEEPA does not authorize presidential tariffs has upended U.S. trade policy, forcing an immediate shift to alternative authorities and creating significant legal uncertainty for $150 billion in revenues. CSIS experts argue that while this provides China with a tactical and propaganda advantage ahead of upcoming summits, it compels Congress to reclaim its constitutional role in defining a more strategic and stable trade framework. The analysis highlights that reliance on coercive tariffs alone has failed to curb the overall trade deficit or effectively reindustrialize the U.S., instead increasing costs for critical energy and technology supply chains. Consequently, the panel recommends a policy pivot toward a 'positive agenda' that prioritizes domestic innovation, infrastructure, and allied cooperation over blunt import substitution.

    Read at CSIS

  654. 654.

    This CFR guide outlines the 'America First' transformation of U.S. foreign policy during the first year of President Trump’s second term, emphasizing a shift toward unilateralism and aggressive economic nationalism. Key developments highlighted include the 2025 National Security Strategy's focus on regional dominance, the military capture of Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro, and significant withdrawals from international organizations and climate agreements. These policies have strained traditional alliances while prioritizing U.S. resource access and domestic border security over global humanitarian assistance. Ultimately, the administration's approach suggests a future of transactional global engagement and a preference for military-backed regime change over multilateral diplomacy.

    Read at CFR

  655. 655.
    2026-02-24 | middle_east | 2026-W09 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article critiques the widespread confidence among foreign policy establishments regarding the ability to manage the fallout from a potential U.S. attack on Iran. It argues that this overconfidence is rooted in a misunderstanding of political norms and the unpredictable nature of key decision-makers. The text provides evidence of a pattern where a specific political figure has historically disregarded established foreign policy advice and norms, such as the move of the American embassy to Jerusalem, without facing apparent repercussions. Consequently, policymakers should be cautious, as standard strategic planning may fail to account for the volatile and norm-breaking actions of powerful political actors.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  656. 656.
    2026-02-24 | society | 2026-W09 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    The State of the Union address is a foundational U.S. constitutional tradition that has evolved from a formal written report into a high-stakes televised event used to define presidential agendas. Historical data indicates that while the complexity of the speech's prose has decreased to reach a wider audience, actual television viewership has declined sharply over recent decades. Nonetheless, the address remains a critical mechanism for presidents to fulfill constitutional obligations and announce major foreign policy doctrines during periods of international instability.

    Read at CFR

  657. 657.
    2026-02-24 | society | 2026-W09 | Topics: Climate, Middle East, United States

    Brookings scholars analyze the second Trump administration's first year of education policy, highlighting a paradoxical strategy of dismantling federal bureaucracy while aggressively using civil rights enforcement to advance culture-war priorities. Key actions include slashing Department of Education staff, ending DEI initiatives despite empirical evidence of their value, and withholding funds from institutions over campus protests and transgender policies. The analysis suggests that while executive orders have significantly restructured the federal role, long-term impact remains uncertain due to ongoing litigation and the need for Congressional support to terminate major programs like IDEA and Title I.

    Read at Brookings

  658. 658.
    2026-02-23 | diplomacy | 2026-W09 | Topics: AI, Middle East, United States

    Saudi Arabia has shifted from a path of gradual rapprochement to a policy of strategic distancing from Israel, making normalization unlikely in the near term. This shift is fueled by overwhelming domestic public opposition, increasingly harsh rhetoric from leadership regarding the conflict in Gaza, and a non-negotiable demand for a Palestinian state based on 1967 borders. Consequently, Riyadh now views normalization as a risk to its regional standing and domestic legitimacy rather than a strategic opportunity. Any return to the normalization trajectory will require significant developments in the Palestinian arena and a fundamental reassessment of Israel's regional role.

    Read at INSS

  659. 659.

    Israel must transition from reliance on foreign digital infrastructure to a model of digital sovereignty to protect its national security and strategic autonomy in the AI era. While a global leader in innovation, Israel faces vulnerabilities due to its dependence on international cloud providers, semiconductor supply chains, and a regulatory environment ill-suited for large-scale domestic infrastructure projects. To mitigate these risks, the paper recommends designating digital assets as strategic national infrastructure, integrating energy planning with data center needs, and establishing a sovereign hybrid cloud framework to ensure national control over critical data and computing resources.

    Read at INSS

  660. 660.
    2026-02-23 | other | 2026-W09 | Topics: Middle East, Trade

    The ISNAD influence campaign, linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, has pivoted from a wartime focus on ending the Gaza conflict to a long-term 'sociological warfare' strategy targeting Israel’s internal social fabric. Evidence from social media analysis indicates a shift toward narratives that delegitimize state institutions, foster extreme political polarization, and encourage emigration to undermine national cohesion. This evolution into a more professionalized and defensive operation suggests that Israel must treat such civilian-led digital campaigns as significant threats to its long-term social resilience and national security.

    Read at INSS

  661. 661.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Climate, Middle East, Russia, United States

    Sudan is currently enduring the world’s largest internal displacement and hunger crisis, with over twelve million people forced from their homes following more than two years of civil war between the SAF and RSF. The conflict has escalated toward a de facto partition of the country, marked by the RSF's capture of Darfur and widespread reports of ethnically driven genocide. Strategic implications include heightened regional instability as neighboring countries struggle with refugee inflows and external powers continue to fuel the violence through arms and financing. With humanitarian appeals severely underfunded due to international budget cuts, the crisis risks becoming a permanent humanitarian catastrophe of historic proportions.

    Read at CFR

  662. 662.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: AI, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    INSS argues that Saudi–UAE ties have shifted from tactical coordination to a structural strategic rivalry over regional leadership, influence, and economic primacy. It cites widening divergence across conflict theaters (Yemen, Sudan, and Qatar diplomacy), competing regional alignments, and escalating economic competition tied to Saudi Vision 2030 and efforts to challenge Dubai’s hub status. The analysis contends this is not a temporary leadership dispute but part of a broader regional reordering, with implications for Gulf cohesion, Red Sea dynamics, and external actors’ planning assumptions. For policymakers, the key takeaway is to avoid treating a Saudi–Emirati bloc as fixed, hedge against further fragmentation, and for Israel in particular avoid appearing to choose sides while preserving channels to both Riyadh and Abu Dhabi.

    Read at INSS

  663. 663.
    2026-02-22 | other | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Middle East, Ukraine

    Chatham House’s announcement frames Marc Weller’s appointment as a leadership move to strengthen the Global Governance and Security Centre at a moment when international order is under strain. The core claim is that, despite geopolitical fragmentation, urgent transnational problems still require rule-based global cooperation on security, health preparedness, AI governance, and international law. The institute supports this by highlighting Weller’s credentials across academia, UN mediation and legal advisory roles, and recent policy interventions on Gaza, Ukraine, Venezuela, and broader legal-system defense. Strategically, the appointment signals a push for more active institutional reform and coalition-building among governments, business, and civil society to preserve and update multilateral governance frameworks.

    Read at Chatham House

  664. 664.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, Russia

    Chatham House argues that Assad’s abrupt fall in December 2024 revealed Syria’s state fragility, the limited capacity of Iran and Russia to sustain him, and the strategic failure of past Western policy. It reasons that Syria’s transition will be shaped by neighboring states—especially Turkey, Jordan, Israel, and Lebanon—which see both security risks and geopolitical openings as a new government seeks reconstruction support. The analysis highlights Lebanon’s governance stress from Hezbollah’s weakening after conflict with Israel, and Jordan’s added vulnerability as U.S. policy under President Donald Trump may intensify West Bank dynamics. Policy strategy should therefore prioritize a genuinely Syrian-led political transition, disciplined regional burden-sharing, and early safeguards against spillover instability in Lebanon and Jordan while avoiding prior external policy mistakes.

    Read at Chatham House

  665. 665.

    The panel argues that the U.S. seizure of Maduro marks a broader shift to explicit hemispheric power politics, where Washington is willing to use force based on narrowly defined national interests rather than traditional multilateral norms. Speakers contend that while the operation was tactically successful, it does not resolve Venezuela’s underlying governance, corruption, and institutional collapse, making durable stabilization and democratic transition highly uncertain. They also stress that the oil rationale is weak: Venezuela’s heavy crude, degraded infrastructure, legal uncertainty, and soft global demand make rapid production recovery costly and commercially unattractive, while disruption to China is likely limited. Strategically, the event signals a more fragmented Latin America, pressures partners into pragmatic bilateral bargaining with the U.S., and suggests policymakers should prioritize scenario planning for follow-on interventions, institutional reconstruction pathways, and tighter coordination among non-U.S. actors to preserve regional sovereignty and stability.

    Read at Chatham House

  666. 666.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The panel’s core judgment is that MENA is showing “stabilization in name only”: open wars are partly contained, but underlying drivers of conflict are intensifying. Speakers pointed to converging internal and external pressure on Iran, a Gaza ceasefire that is effectively fragile and incomplete, renewed Saudi-UAE competition (including in Yemen), and Syria’s unsettled political order with Turkey-Israel rivalry layered on top. They also argued that a fragmented global system is producing multi-alignment rather than clear blocs, with licit and illicit financial networks blurring traditional binaries and complicating sanctions and governance. The strategic implication is that regional and Western policymakers should move beyond ad hoc conflict management toward coordinated, multi-actor political processes, while preparing for cross-border spillovers (security, migration, and economic disruption) if current flashpoints reignite.

    Read at Chatham House

  667. 667.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East

    The Chatham House event argues that late-2025 Saudi-UAE friction over Yemen reflects a deeper strategic split, not just a tactical disagreement in one conflict. The core evidence is their opposing local alignments: the UAE’s backing of the Southern Transitional Council and southern autonomy versus Saudi support for Yemen’s internationally recognized government and territorial unity. Saudi efforts to freeze front lines and push a political settlement, alongside the UAE’s announced full withdrawal, exposed incompatible views of Yemen’s future security and governance architecture. Strategically, this suggests Gulf coordination will be less automatic, and policymakers should treat Yemen as a test case for wider Riyadh-Abu Dhabi divergence in regional influence, security priorities, and economic statecraft.

    Read at Chatham House

  668. 668.
    2026-02-22 | society | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    CFR argues that Trump’s State of the Union is primarily a political reset attempt as he faces low approval, difficult midterm dynamics, and skepticism that presidential rhetoric can quickly shift opinion. The article cites weak polling, slowing GDP growth, persistent goods-trade deficits, and a Supreme Court ruling curbing his use of IEEPA tariffs, leaving narrower options such as Section 122. It also flags major foreign-policy pressure points—Iran, Venezuela, China, NATO, Ukraine, and Gaza—where his messaging may signal priorities but not resolve underlying constraints. The key strategic implication is that while the speech can shape partisan narratives, policy outcomes will be driven more by legal limits on executive trade tools, electoral pressures, and high-risk security decisions that may outpace congressional checks.

    Read at CFR

  669. 669.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    CFR’s core finding is that Iran’s system is institutionally complex but functionally centered on the supreme leader’s clerical-security network, which constrains elected officials and limits meaningful reform. The article’s reasoning maps how formal bodies—the presidency, majlis, Guardian Council, Expediency Council, Assembly of Experts, and Supreme National Security Council—are structurally shaped by appointment authority, candidate vetting, and IRGC-linked influence tied to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. It argues that recent shocks, including the June 2025 Israeli strikes and the late-2025/2026 protest wave, exposed regime vulnerabilities, yet the state’s coercive response also demonstrated enduring control by hard-line power centers. The policy implication is that strategy toward Tehran should focus on the supreme leader’s orbit and security institutions, combining calibrated pressure and diplomacy while preparing for episodic instability rather than expecting elected offices alone to drive change.

    Read at CFR

  670. 670.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Trade, United States

    Chatham House argues that Haiti is entering a decisive security and governance transition, and that restoring order now requires a credible, integrated strategy rather than another narrow short-term intervention. The event framing points to entrenched gang violence, political uncertainty around the Transitional Presidential Council’s post-7 February transition, and worsening economic distress as mutually reinforcing drivers of instability. Its reasoning emphasizes lessons from past multilateral missions and the need to align Haitian institutions, regional actors, and international partners around a practical roadmap that links security operations with economic recovery and job creation. Strategically, the implication is that external support should shift toward sustained, Haitian-led institution building with clearer coordination, accountability, and economic stabilization goals if durable security is to be achieved.

    Read at Chatham House

  671. 671.

    The discussion argues that 2026 conflict risk will be shaped less by traditional multilateral conflict management and more by sphere-of-influence politics and transactional dealmaking by major powers. Ero’s reasoning is that with over 60 active conflicts, institutions like the UN and established mediators are increasingly sidelined, while regional and great-power actors (e.g., the US in Latin America, Gulf states in Sudan, Turkey in Syria, China in Myanmar) now carry more leverage over war and peace outcomes. She stresses that many current “peace” efforts are short-term truces rather than durable settlements, with places like Gaza, Sudan, and Somalia exposed to continued violence due to proxy competition, weak governance arrangements, and miscalculation risks among powerful states. For policy strategy, the implication is to prioritize pragmatic coalition-building with the actors who actually hold leverage, convert ceasefires into longer political processes, and adapt conflict-prevention tools to a more fragmented, law-weaker international order.

    Read at Chatham House

  672. 672.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, NATO, Nuclear

    Chatham House argues that many Middle Eastern governments now oppose a US strike on Iran because their threat perception has shifted from fear of Iranian regional dominance to concern about Israeli escalation and the consequences of an Iranian state collapse. It points to the weakening of Iran’s “Axis of Resistance” after 7 October 2023, Israeli military pressure across the region, Assad’s fall, and heightened Gulf alarm after Israel’s September 2025 strike on Doha as evidence of this shift. The analysis says regime-change war and broad containment are viewed by Arab states as dangerous and historically ineffective, with high risks of fragmentation, migration, militancy, and regional spillover. The policy implication is to favor de-escalation and targeted, policy-based pressure on Iran’s nuclear, missile, and proxy activities through diplomacy rather than large-scale military action.

    Read at Chatham House

  673. 673.

    Maddox argues that the international system has shifted into destabilizing US-China superpower rivalry, with both powers undermining global peace and prosperity in different ways. She contends that Washington’s transactional unilateralism under Trump and Beijing’s coercive techno-industrial expansion have together weakened alliances, eroded legal norms, and increased risks of conflict, including over Taiwan and transatlantic security. The lecture supports this with examples including tariff coercion, pressure over critical minerals, intensified military signaling, and challenges to institutions such as NATO, the UN system, and global trade mechanisms. Strategically, she calls on non-superpower states to strengthen and build institutions, resolve regional conflicts through principled coalitions, and actively uphold international law to preserve a rules-based order without relying on US leadership.

    Read at Chatham House

  674. 674.

    CFR reports that the White House is ending a large immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota after intense backlash, even as the administration says it remains committed to mass deportations. The drawdown follows allegations of due-process violations, aggressive tactics, and the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens, with DHS still claiming thousands of arrests and no full public accounting yet of all detainees. Evidence in the piece suggests the shift is tactical rather than strategic: personnel are being reassigned, not a broader rollback of interior enforcement, and CBP as well as ICE have expanded domestic operations. For policymakers, this raises a near-term tradeoff between enforcement intensity and political/legal sustainability, with DHS funding negotiations likely to hinge on oversight, transparency, and limits on warrantless or masked operations.

    Read at CFR

  675. 675.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    CFR argues that Tehran is pursuing a tactical, tightly constrained negotiating posture: it wants sanctions relief while preserving core red lines, and is offering only limited nuclear flexibility. Evidence includes Iran’s insistence on Oman as venue and a nuclear-only agenda, plus signals it could cap low-level enrichment and dilute some highly enriched uranium under IAEA verification, while Washington still demands zero enrichment. The article also notes the coercive backdrop: expanded U.S. military presence, Israeli warnings that talks could buy Iran time, and the regime’s violent domestic consolidation after mass protest crackdowns. Policy-wise, this suggests the United States and partners should pair diplomacy with credible deterrence, structure any relief around verifiable compliance, and account for residual proxy risks (especially the Houthis) despite broader degradation of Iran’s network.

    Read at CFR

  676. 676.

    The CFR’s 2026 Preventive Priorities Survey identifies a significant rise in global instability, highlighting five high-likelihood, high-impact contingencies including intensifying conflicts in the Middle East, the Russia-Ukraine war, and potential U.S. military operations in Venezuela. Based on a survey of over 600 experts, the report emphasizes a shift toward interstate conflict and identifies domestic political violence in the U.S. and AI-enabled cyberattacks as critical threats to national security. These findings suggest that the reduction of conflict prevention infrastructure and more coercive diplomatic stances increase the risk of the United States being drawn into costly, unpredicted military interventions.

    Read at CFR

  677. 677.

    Chatham House argues that accountability mechanisms must rapidly adapt because cyber operations are now being used to facilitate core international crimes, not just conventional cybercrime. The event highlights the International Criminal Court prosecutor’s new policy on cyber-enabled crimes under the Rome Statute as a key signal that cyber-enabled atrocities should be investigated and prosecuted on equal footing with offline conduct. Its reasoning centers on clarifying which cyber acts meet international criminal law thresholds, building workable legal frameworks, and addressing practical barriers to attribution, evidence collection, and prosecution. Strategically, states and international institutions should align domestic and international legal tools, strengthen investigative cooperation, and prioritize capacity for cyber-forensics and cross-border accountability.

    Read at Chatham House

  678. 678.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East

    Chatham House frames Yemen’s Islah Party as a durable, central political actor whose influence has persisted through the civil war and will likely matter in any post-war settlement. The event description highlights Islah’s institutional weight—one of Yemen’s largest parties, the second-largest parliamentary bloc, and a participant in the internationally recognized government—as evidence that it remains embedded in formal politics despite conflict fragmentation. It argues that understanding Islah’s ties with regional and international actors is essential to assessing its strategy, bargaining power, and approach to state restructuring. For policymakers, the implication is that viable peace and governance planning should treat Islah as a necessary stakeholder, while testing whether its stated vision can support an inclusive and sustainable political order.

    Read at Chatham House

  679. 679.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    CFR argues that President Trump’s new Board of Peace is becoming the central U.S.-led mechanism for shaping Gaza’s postwar order, but its viability hinges on Hamas demilitarization and credible governance arrangements. Evidence cited includes broad diplomatic participation (27 formal members and about 45 expected delegations), expected reconstruction pledges of at least $5 billion, and a governance model that currently excludes Palestinian factions in favor of a separate technocratic committee. Conditions on the ground remain unstable, with limited medical evacuations and returns through Rafah, blocked humanitarian missions, ongoing Israeli strikes, and mutual truce-violation accusations. Strategically, the initiative could accelerate reconstruction and coordination, but exclusion risks and unresolved security control could undermine legitimacy and push Gaza back toward partition or renewed conflict if disarmament and political reintegration fail.

    Read at CFR

  680. 680.

    The article argues that the Munich Security Conference exposed a deepening political-strategic split inside the West, even as leaders tried to project unity on core security issues. It cites Marco Rubio’s speech as emblematic: he reassured Europe that it still matters to Washington, but paired that with hard limits on U.S. support and warnings that America will act unilaterally when allies resist. The piece also points to contrasting interventions by Wang Yi, Keir Starmer, and Volodymyr Zelenskyy to show how states are recalibrating between U.S.-China rivalry and uncertain transatlantic cohesion. Strategically, it implies European governments should prepare for more conditional U.S. backing, invest in autonomous defense and diplomatic capacity, and pursue flexible coalitions to manage both Russia-related threats and wider great-power competition.

    Read at Chatham House

  681. 681.

    The Trump administration has announced plans to revoke the 2009 Endangerment Finding, a move described as the largest deregulatory action in U.S. history that removes the legal basis for capping greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. The administration argues that eliminating these regulations will reduce energy costs and bolster American energy dominance, though the decision faces immediate legal challenges that could reach the Supreme Court. This policy pivot risks ceding leadership in the global electric vehicle and clean energy transition to China while further isolating the United States from international climate cooperation.

    Read at CFR

  682. 682.

    CFR reports that U.S. Southern Command’s anti-drug boat strike campaign intensified, with eleven people killed in one day across the Eastern Pacific and Caribbean, making it the deadliest day of the operation this year. The brief notes this brings reported fatalities to at least 144 since September, while the U.S. has not publicly released identities or evidence supporting claims that those killed were tied to trafficking networks. It highlights growing legal and normative challenges, including wrongful-death litigation and expert arguments that lethal force against suspected traffickers is unlawful absent an imminent violent threat. Strategically, the campaign may impose rising legal, reputational, and regional diplomatic costs, suggesting a need for stricter oversight, evidentiary transparency, and greater reliance on interdiction and criminal prosecution rather than expanded military strikes.

    Read at CFR

  683. 683.

    CFR panelists argued that commodity markets have shifted from a demand-led cycle to a supply- and policy-driven regime, with metals (especially gold and silver) rising while oil remains structurally softer. They cited evidence including sustained central-bank gold purchases since the 2022 reserve-freeze shock, growing investor hedging demand, tariff uncertainty under Section 232, and OPEC+/non-OPEC supply conditions that cap oil despite geopolitical tensions. The speakers assessed that oil spikes are still possible from Iran-related disruptions or labor shocks, but likely temporary unless a major outage occurs; baseline Brent expectations clustered around the high-$50s to low-$60s. Strategically, governments and firms should treat commodities as instruments of national security and currency power (including dollar-denominated oil flows), while preparing for persistent precious-metal strength, selective industrial-metal volatility, and policy tradeoffs in U.S.-Venezuela-Canada energy alignment.

    Read at CFR

  684. 684.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The article argues that the unusually large U.S. military buildup around Iran has put the Middle East on edge because regional governments see a high risk of conflict but still lack clarity on Washington’s objectives. It points to Gulf states’ refusal to join an attack, dual U.S. carrier deployments, and fears of Iranian retaliation through Strait of Hormuz disruption and proxy strikes, while noting Geneva talks produced only vague “guiding principles” rather than a concrete deal. It also highlights the contradiction between launching a Gaza reconstruction-oriented Board of Peace and simultaneously signaling readiness for military escalation against Tehran. The policy implication is that U.S. strategy must align deterrence with explicit end-states, coalition reassurance, and escalation-control mechanisms to avoid a broader regional war that could derail both Gulf economic priorities and Gaza stabilization.

    Read at CFR

  685. 685.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    CFR’s brief argues that simultaneous Geneva negotiations on Iran’s nuclear file and the Ukraine war show the Trump administration trying to position Washington as the indispensable conflict broker, but both tracks remain constrained by major unresolved gaps. The report cites concrete escalation signals and bargaining asymmetries: U.S. military deployments and Iranian drills near Hormuz alongside disagreements over deal scope, and in Ukraine, continued Russian strike pressure and territorial demands despite recent Ukrainian battlefield gains. It also notes mixed diplomatic conditions, including European unease with parts of U.S. positioning and broader geopolitical moves by major powers, indicating a fragmented coalition environment. Strategically, the implication is that U.S. diplomacy may secure partial or phased outcomes at best unless paired with stronger leverage, clearer end-state definitions, and tighter allied coordination.

    Read at CFR

  686. 686.

    The webinar argues that global oil geopolitics has been fundamentally reshaped by Russia’s war in Ukraine, OPEC+ supply management, and shifting demand centers, even as the energy transition advances. Carolyn Kissane stresses that the world still consumes over 100 million barrels per day, with demand growth concentrated in Asia, while Russia has largely sustained exports by redirecting discounted crude to buyers such as India and China. She also highlights that state-owned producers and OPEC+ coordination continue to exert strong influence on prices, making markets vulnerable when supply is curtailed in already tight conditions. The policy implication is a dual-track strategy: preserve short-term energy security and price stability through diversified supply and contingency tools, while accelerating credible decarbonization pathways that account for uneven capacity and financing constraints across regions.

    Read at CFR

  687. 687.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    Following the brutal suppression of late 2025 protests, Iranian reformists have shifted from advocating gradual internal change to openly challenging the Islamic Republic's foundational legitimacy. Key leaders like Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi are now demanding national referendums on a new constitution, signaling a break from their previous commitment to the regime's core principles. While their current organizational power is weak and public trust has eroded, these figures could serve as a critical ideological bridge and moderate governing alternative during a future period of regime erosion or transition. This potential role is amplified by the lack of other viable, domestically-led opposition groups capable of managing a political shift.

    Read at INSS

  688. 688.

    The report argues that European nations must strengthen sanctions against Russia’s 'shadow fleet' of oil tankers by mandating adequate insurance coverage through stricter regulation of flag states. This strategy aims to force vessels back into Western-regulated services, ensuring compliance with price caps and mitigating the risk of uninsured environmental disasters. Economic modeling indicates that aggressive enforcement, including insurance disclosure and flag state liability, could reduce Russian Baltic oil tax revenues by up to 14% while shifting the majority of trade to compliant vessels. To implement this, the UK and EU should coordinate on universal maritime standards and exert diplomatic and economic pressure on 'flags of convenience' to eliminate loopholes used for sanctions evasion.

    Read at Brookings

  689. 689.

    CFR argues that a future Taiwan conflict will likely be a protracted, regional war involving multiple actors and external triggers, rather than a contained three-way contest. The report warns that China’s military modernization and gray-zone tactics have eroded U.S. deterrent advantages and shortened operational warning times. To address these new risks, the U.S. must shift from isolated planning to deeply integrated, pre-crisis consultative mechanisms with regional allies like Japan and the Philippines.

    Read at CFR

  690. 690.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: AI, China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The U.S. and Iran face a volatile '50/50' chance of either military conflict or a symbolic diplomatic framework as an unprecedented U.S. military build-up meets low-trust negotiations in Geneva. While the Trump administration seeks a high-profile declaration of victory, Iran demands a formal negotiated text to ensure sanctions relief amid internal social unrest and Israeli pressure for preemption. Gulf states are actively mediating to avoid a regional war that would jeopardize their multi-billion dollar transitions into global AI and digital hubs. Consequently, any tactical miscalculation, particularly involving proxies like the Houthis, could trigger a wider entanglement with severe global economic and security repercussions.

    Read at CSIS

  691. 691.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    CFR argues that Iran still does not have a nuclear weapon, but it retains the technical base to move quickly toward one and continues to field the Middle East’s most extensive ballistic missile arsenal despite major Israeli and U.S. strikes in 2025. The piece cites IAEA findings of sharply increased near-weapons-grade enrichment, evidence of undeclared nuclear-related activity, and estimates that Iran’s breakout timeline for fissile material could be very short, while missile capabilities include systems with roughly 2,000 km range and demonstrated use in 2024 attacks on Israel. It also notes that military strikes may have delayed but not eliminated Iran’s program, as rebuilding and renewed U.S.-Iran talks in Oman suggest coercion alone has limits. Strategically, the article implies policymakers need a combined approach of verifiable nuclear constraints, missile/proxy limits, calibrated sanctions relief, and credible deterrence to reduce risks of regional war, proliferation, and escalation through miscalculation.

    Read at CFR

  692. 692.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, United States

    Chatham House argues that the 2026 security environment is being transformed by overlapping geopolitical, military, and technological shocks that are testing established alliances and institutions. Its reasoning highlights NATO burden-sharing strains around 5% defence spending targets, strategic recalibration under a renewed Trump administration, China’s military modernization alongside Indo-Pacific flashpoints, and persistent interstate/proxy conflicts in the Middle East. It also emphasizes that climate-conflict dynamics, critical materials competition, and increasingly sophisticated cyber and espionage activity are blurring traditional warfighting domains. The policy implication is that governments and industry should prioritize cross-domain strategy, stronger public-private defence partnerships, and more efficient use of rising defence budgets to build resilience and credible deterrence.

    Read at Chatham House

  693. 693.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine

    The article argues that the EU’s 2026 designation of the IRGC as a terrorist organization marks a decisive break from three decades of engagement-based Iran policy. It says Europe’s old balance of pressure and dialogue collapsed after cumulative shocks: Iran’s military support to Russia after 2022, repression following Mahsa Amini’s death, failure to restore the nuclear deal in 2023, and UN snapback sanctions in 2025. The immediate trigger was the scale of the early-2026 crackdown, which convinced European governments there were no credible Iranian interlocutors left and that non-designation carried unacceptable reputational costs. Strategically, the move raises legal and compliance risks for EU and non-EU firms tied to Iran while likely reducing the EU’s diplomatic leverage, leaving Europe more sidelined in US-Iran decision-making.

    Read at Chatham House

  694. 694.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East

    Chatham House’s Middle East and North Africa Programme argues that better policy on the region requires grounded, field-based analysis of often overlooked drivers of conflict, governance stress, and state–society change. It supports this approach through a research model combining field data collection, bilingual policy publications, convening with decision-makers across sectors, and direct briefings in MENA, the UK, and the US. The programme’s focus on geopolitical competition, transnational conflict dynamics, political-economic networks, and accountability is presented as the analytical basis for more realistic policy choices. For strategy, the implication is that governments and institutions should rely on locally informed, cross-regional, and cross-sector evidence to design interventions and partnerships that are politically feasible and context-specific.

    Read at Chatham House

  695. 695.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Europe, Middle East

    Chatham House argues that reopening Rafah is a meaningful but fragile breakthrough: it restores a limited non-Israeli outlet for Gazans, yet remains vulnerable to political, security, and operational reversal. Evidence cited includes very low initial crossing numbers, Israeli pre-clearance and vetting rules, reported harassment, and historical patterns in which security incidents, monitoring bottlenecks, and factional competition repeatedly led to closure or violence. The paper also notes Israeli domestic electoral pressures, far-right opposition, and concerns over smuggling, all of which could undermine implementation of the wider October 2025 ceasefire framework and Gaza reconstruction plans. Strategically, the implication is that external actors should prioritize robust monitoring, transparent crossing governance, and sustained diplomatic pressure to prevent backsliding, while recognizing that continued closure would deepen despair and likely fuel renewed instability.

    Read at Chatham House

  696. 696.

    Chatham House argues that Trump’s energy-dominance agenda is delivering visible short-term gains in US oil and LNG output, but global market dynamics make sustained political control over energy trajectories difficult. The article points to record US oil production, LNG export growth above 20%, coal-plant retention measures, and ambitious nuclear expansion goals, while also noting renewables still took most new US power capacity in 2025 and globally covered all demand growth as they surpassed coal in generation. It emphasizes that energy investment cycles run 5–10 years, so current outcomes reflect earlier decisions and require long policy continuity to lock in structural change. For strategy, the US may gain near-term geopolitical leverage over prices and supply chains, but allies’ mixed responses, persistent renewable cost competitiveness, and deeper US exposure to hydrocarbon regions limit long-term dominance and complicate policy tradeoffs.

    Read at Chatham House

  697. 697.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    This CSIS analysis maps four potential oil supply disruption scenarios resulting from a possible U.S. military strike against Iran, warning that Tehran's current vulnerability may drive it to target regional energy infrastructure as a last resort. The report details how direct attacks on Arab Gulf facilities could push global oil prices above $130 per barrel, particularly as bypass routes for the Strait of Hormuz remain significantly limited in capacity. These dynamics present a strategic dilemma for the Trump administration, where escalating military pressure could trigger a global energy crisis or a 'use it or lose it' miscalculation by Iranian leadership.

    Read at CSIS

  698. 698.

    Greek Foreign Minister George Gerapetritis argued that Europe is in a transition period requiring both stronger strategic autonomy and continued transatlantic cohesion, rather than a rupture with the United States or NATO. He supported higher European defense burden-sharing, warned that a sustainable Ukraine settlement must be fair and sovereignty-based, and maintained confidence that NATO Article 5 remains credible despite current political volatility. On the Middle East, he backed a UN-anchored Gaza stabilization framework, welcomed coordination with the proposed Board of Peace only within a limited Gaza mandate, and stressed that disarming Hamas must be paired with governance and education to prevent renewed extremism. He also framed Greece as a strategic energy and logistics hub and linked EU trade deals with India and Mercosur to a wider strategy of diversification, implying policymakers should reduce overreliance risks while preserving rules-based multilateral institutions.

    Read at CFR

  699. 699.

    The column argues that Trump’s 2026 National Defense Strategy (NDS) is built on prioritization and burden-sharing, but the Iran crisis could expose a gap between that framework and the president’s willingness to intervene aggressively. Froman points to NDS language that shifts U.S. focus toward homeland and hemispheric defense, expects allies in Europe and the Indo-Pacific to assume more conventional responsibilities, and seeks a limited “decent peace” with China rather than outright dominance. He contrasts that restraint with Trump’s military signaling toward Iran, including carrier redeployment and maximal demands, while warning that Iran is far harder to coerce or reshape than Venezuela and could produce prolonged instability after any regime shock. The strategic implication is that U.S. policy must keep Iran actions tightly bounded to avoid a costly quagmire that would undermine NDS prioritization and broader force posture goals.

    Read at CFR

  700. 700.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Europe, Middle East

    Chatham House argues that the African Union’s handling of Sudan has become a major leadership failure and that the February 2026 AU summit is a narrow chance to reset strategy before state fragmentation becomes irreversible. It cites the scale of the crisis (about two-thirds of 53 million people needing aid, 13.6 million displaced, and nearly half facing severe food insecurity) and shows how AU inconsistency and weak enforcement have reduced leverage over both the SAF and RSF. The paper also highlights a fragmented mediation landscape, with the US-led Quad, AU-led Quintet, and AU internal mechanisms pulling in different directions while key regional actors are widely perceived as biased. For policy, it recommends the AU reassert primacy, enforce norm-consistent neutrality, and link ceasefire/humanitarian negotiations to a unified AU-led political process to increase pressure on the warring parties and limit wider regional spillover.

    Read at Chatham House

  701. 701.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Taiwan, Ukraine

    The paper argues that Ukraine’s wartime defense-industrial adaptation offers a practical model for European rearmament under prolonged high-intensity conflict conditions. It attributes Ukraine’s resilience to three factors: restructuring domestic defense production, rapidly diversifying and hardening supply chains, and building flexible external industrial partnerships beyond Europe. The analysis highlights the growing strategic relevance of Indo-Pacific actors such as South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan for technology and components, while noting that dependence on China remains both operationally important and geopolitically risky. For European strategy, the report implies that rearmament planning should prioritize industrial agility, supplier diversification, and broader cross-regional defense partnerships to strengthen long-term resilience.

    Read at IISS

  702. 702.

    The article argues that Kenya is moving from a primarily regional leadership role toward a broader, more assertive global foreign policy posture in response to a shifting world order. Its reasoning centers on Kenya’s 2024 strategy, which combines regional integration goals with diversified external partnerships, including longstanding Western security and economic ties, a strategic partnership with China, and expanding links with the UAE. Kenya’s engagement in multilateral security efforts, including the multinational mission in Haiti, is presented as evidence of its willingness to project influence beyond East Africa despite domestic protest pressures and regional conflict risks. Strategically, this suggests Kenya is pursuing pragmatic multi-alignment to maximize diplomatic leverage, trade and financing opportunities, while managing the risks of geopolitical balancing and policy overextension.

    Read at Chatham House

  703. 703.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Trade, United States

    Chatham House’s UK in the World Programme argues that the UK must rethink foreign policy for a more multipolar and less predictable environment, as its traditional relationships with the US and Europe evolve and new actors gain influence. It reasons that the UK can still act effectively as an influential mid-sized power and global broker, but only if external strategy is linked to domestic renewal on growth, regional inequality, and public service capacity. The programme supports this through expert working groups, policy analysis on trade-offs, and public engagement focused on economic security, development, strategic partnerships, and science and technology. The strategic implication is that UK policymakers should pursue a more integrated domestic-foreign policy approach, prioritizing resilient partnerships, economic security, and innovation-led statecraft.

    Read at Chatham House

  704. 704.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, Ukraine, United States

    Chatham House argues that the post-1945 international order is under growing strain from renewed interstate aggression, coercive diplomacy, and great-power competition over future global rules. It reasons that credibility gaps—such as perceived Western double standards on Ukraine and Gaza—and a more transactional US foreign policy are accelerating institutional fragmentation. The centre’s approach is to identify which legacy norms can be preserved, where new rules are needed, and how to give greater weight to smaller states, aspiring middle powers, and Global South voices across security, law, digital, and health domains. For policymakers, the implication is that effective strategy now requires pragmatic institutional reform and broader coalition-building, rather than reliance on legacy governance frameworks alone.

    Read at Chatham House

  705. 705.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Russia, United States

    The article argues that a tougher Trump approach to Cuba may raise pressure on Havana, but is unlikely to produce a quick Venezuela-style political breakthrough. It points to Cuba’s deepening economic and energy crisis after losing subsidized Venezuelan oil, while emphasizing the regime’s durable control through the Communist Party, security institutions, and weak, fragmented domestic opposition. It also notes that U.S. law (especially the 1992 and 1996 embargo statutes) sharply limits what any administration can offer unless major democratic conditions are met, constraining deal-making. Strategically, this suggests Washington risks worsening humanitarian conditions and migration flows without guaranteed regime change, so policy should combine pressure with realistic transition benchmarks and crisis contingency planning.

    Read at Chatham House

  706. 706.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, United States

    IISS argues that maritime insecurity in the Horn of Africa is being reshaped by Somalia’s unresolved state fragility, producing a renewed mix of piracy, arms-smuggling, and strategic competition over ports and bases. The report links piracy’s resurgence since late 2023 to reduced international naval pressure, relaxed commercial risk controls, and regional diversion caused by Red Sea attacks, while also documenting cross-Gulf arms networks that move munitions and dual-use components between Yemen and the Horn. It finds that although external powers are increasingly active, many port and basing ambitions remain tentative, with outcomes still heavily mediated by local actors and domestic Somali/Somaliland politics. For policy, the implication is to pair maritime deterrence with sustained land-side governance and counter-smuggling efforts, while managing great-power and Gulf rivalries through long-horizon diplomacy that accounts for rapid political shifts such as Somaliland recognition and Somalia’s cancellation of UAE agreements.

    Read at IISS

  707. 707.

    The panel argues that China under Xi is pursuing a long-term effort to reshape international order around sovereignty, regime security, and reduced Western dominance, while avoiding costly ideological bloc politics. Speakers cite evidence including Beijing’s security-first governance model, parallel institution-building (e.g., BRI, AIIB, SCO, BRICS-adjacent platforms), efforts to de-risk supply chains and build economic leverage, and selective mediation diplomacy aimed especially at the Global South. They also emphasize tensions in China’s approach: it promotes an alternative governance narrative but still works inside existing institutions, and its global ambitions are constrained by domestic economic pressures and external pushback. For policymakers, the implication is to treat China’s strategy as structural and adaptive rather than episodic, requiring coordinated responses on economic resilience, technology dependence, and coalition-based diplomacy rather than issue-by-issue reactions.

    Read at Chatham House

  708. 708.
    2026-02-22 | tech | 2026-W08 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Middle East

    The INSS argues that subsea data centers could become a strategic infrastructure option for Israel by addressing AI-era pressures on electricity, freshwater, and land while strengthening digital sovereignty. It cites evidence from Microsoft’s Project Natick and Chinese deployments showing major gains in cooling efficiency, reduced freshwater use, lower land footprint, and improved hardware reliability in sealed underwater environments. The paper also stresses that these benefits are offset by unresolved environmental effects, difficult maintenance logistics, heightened sabotage/espionage risks to subsea assets, and legal-regulatory gaps under current maritime law. Strategically, it recommends that Israel proactively assess pilot adoption, integrate planning with existing offshore energy/communications infrastructure, and develop dedicated regulation, environmental monitoring, and maritime protection doctrines in coordination with regional partners.

    Read at INSS

  709. 709.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    Chatham House argues that the late-2025 protest wave in Iran is more structurally consequential than episodic unrest because economic collapse has fused with broader political grievances and demands for systemic change. The event framing highlights sustained nationwide mobilization despite repression, internet blackouts, and security crackdowns, suggesting deeper legitimacy erosion rather than short-term discontent. It also points to protest demographics and persistence as key indicators that the Islamic Republic’s coercive tools may restore control only temporarily. For policymakers, this implies planning for prolonged instability in Iran, calibrating external pressure and messaging carefully, and assessing second-order regional effects involving US and Israeli strategy.

    Read at Chatham House

  710. 710.

    Chatham House argues that a second Trump presidency signals a shift from US hegemony to a more openly imperial foreign policy built on coercive leverage rather than alliance stewardship. It cites transactional diplomacy, disregard for international norms, threats toward allies such as Denmark over Greenland, and the operation to capture Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro as evidence of greater willingness to use force in support of a hemispheric dominance strategy. The analysis says this approach weakens NATO cohesion and broader European security assumptions while creating a more volatile environment in which states inside and outside Washington’s preferred orbit must recalibrate. It also concludes that Russia and China face a mix of risk and opportunity as US policy becomes more confrontational, producing a brittle order with higher miscalculation risk.

    Read at Chatham House

  711. 711.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, Trade

    Chatham House argues that Nouri al-Maliki’s brief comeback bid exposed how Iraq’s political system remains highly vulnerable to external power competition despite official claims of restored sovereignty. The article cites Iran’s rapid backing of Maliki through networks tied to the Coordination Framework and PMF-linked actors, alongside Washington’s late but forceful intervention (including Trump’s public warning) to block an Iran-aligned outcome. It also frames Maliki’s candidacy as a break from Iraq’s post-2003 pattern of selecting weak consensus premiers, showing how quickly elite bargains can shift under foreign pressure. Strategically, the piece implies Iraq’s near-term stability depends on fast government formation, tighter management of militia-state fragmentation, and a balancing approach that reduces exposure to escalating US-Iran confrontation.

    Read at Chatham House

  712. 712.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    Turkey views the stability of the Iranian regime as a vital national security interest, prioritizing the regional status quo over potential democratic change or regime collapse. Ankara fears that upheaval in Tehran would trigger massive migration waves, disrupt critical energy supplies, and create a governance vacuum exploitable by Kurdish separatist groups like the PKK. Consequently, the Turkish government has framed domestic Iranian protests as foreign-led conspiracies, indicating that Turkey will likely prioritize regime continuity in Tehran to prevent regional instability and economic contagion.

    Read at INSS

  713. 713.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    INSS argues that current U.S. force posture in CENTCOM reflects a pre-crisis phase combining coercive diplomacy with credible military readiness against Iran, while trying to avoid a long war. It cites roughly 40,000 U.S. personnel, a carrier strike group near Oman, multiple destroyers, expanded strike and ISR assets, reinforced missile defenses, and elevated airlift as evidence of preparations beyond symbolic signaling. The analysis also contends Iran is under heavy internal and external pressure but remains regime-stable, making diplomacy appear tactical and time-buying rather than genuinely de-escalatory. Strategically, this posture may strengthen deterrence and bargaining leverage, but it also raises the risk of miscalculation and rapid escalation among the U.S., Iran, and Israel.

    Read at INSS

  714. 714.

    Chatham House frames Trump’s conflict strategy as a deliberate break from traditional diplomacy, centered on his pledge to act as a “peacemaker and unifier” through high-pressure dealmaking. The core logic is transactional: use US leverage to force adversaries into negotiations and lock in outcomes across multiple conflicts, including Ukraine, Gaza, the South Caucasus, and the DRC. The event description highlights mixed and disputed results, arguing that while this approach can create openings, it also unsettles allies and even parts of Trump’s domestic base that see tension with an America First posture. For policymakers, the key implication is that US-led peacemaking may become more coercive and personalized, requiring partners to adapt quickly while planning for uneven sustainability and credibility risks across simultaneous theaters.

    Read at Chatham House

  715. 715.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    Chatham House argues that US global influence remains substantial but is increasingly perceived as declining, particularly in economic terms, as China, India and Russia gain weight. The analysis points to policy volatility and experimentation across major dossiers, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Paris climate accord, the Iran nuclear deal, and relations with the EU, Russia and North Korea. At the same time, persistent transnational challenges such as trade, climate change, nuclear risk and terrorism are presented as areas where US engagement is still indispensable. The strategic implication is that Washington’s credibility will depend less on unilateral dominance and more on consistent, coalition-based leadership in managing shared global risks.

    Read at Chatham House

  716. 716.
    2026-02-22 | economy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Climate, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Trade, United States

    CFR reports that the U.S. goods trade deficit reached a record in 2025, undermining the Trump administration’s claim that emergency tariffs would shrink it and revive domestic manufacturing. Commerce Department data show tariffs redirected sourcing away from China toward countries such as Vietnam and Mexico rather than reducing overall import dependence, while U.S. manufacturing employment fell by about 72,000 jobs after the April 2025 tariff rollout. The brief notes that long-run investment effects from trade deals could still appear, but current evidence points to limited near-term reindustrialization gains. With a Supreme Court ruling pending, the tariffs could be struck down and trigger up to an estimated $175 billion in refunds, highlighting fiscal and strategic risks in a tariff-first policy mix.

    Read at CFR

  717. 717.

    The article argues that the U.S. must update its narrative on Taiwan, moving away from viewing the island as a 'strategic liability' or a single point of failure for the global economy. It highlights that Taiwan's hardware is the irreplaceable backbone of America's AI ambitions and that conflict with China is not inevitable if a credible military deterrent is maintained. The proposed policy shift emphasizes a middle path: preserving the status quo to allow for an eventual non-coercive resolution while grounding U.S. support in calculated self-interest rather than ideological charity.

    Read at Brookings

  718. 718.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Russia, United States

    The INSS reports that President Trump’s 'Board of Peace' (BoP) has evolved from a specific Gaza stabilization initiative into a global conflict-resolution mechanism that bypasses the UN framework, leading to a refusal by major Western democracies to participate. This highly centralized body, controlled personally by Trump, lacks broad international legitimacy and relies on a mix of regional partners and non-democratic states. While the BoP may successfully oversee short-term operational goals in Gaza due to US and regional backing, its long-term viability is threatened by its isolation from traditional Western allies. For Israel, participation offers direct influence over Gaza's reconstruction but risks diplomatic isolation within a board composed of regional rivals.

    Read at INSS

  719. 719.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    INSS argues that the U.S.-Iran track is in a temporary de-escalation, but absent major Iranian concessions the risk of renewed military confrontation remains high. The analysis cites deep gaps over Iran’s missile program and proxy support, Trump’s credibility pressures after a large U.S. force buildup, and Iran’s regime-survival mindset amid severe domestic unrest and repression as reasons diplomacy may stall. It also notes that Tehran may show limited flexibility on nuclear issues, especially after damage to enrichment capabilities, while refusing concessions on missiles and regional allies. Strategically, a nuclear-only deal with sanctions relief could stabilize the Iranian regime without resolving core regional security threats, leaving Israel and Gulf partners exposed and requiring continued coercive leverage alongside diplomacy.

    Read at INSS

  720. 720.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    CFR’s February 22, 2026, nuclear arms control coverage argues that nonproliferation and arms control remain central to managing great-power rivalry and regional nuclear risks. The evidence is the breadth of its featured analyses and backgrounders—spanning the Iran nuclear deal, sanctions on North Korea, and emerging domains such as outer space—plus contributions from multiple senior experts and task-force work. The overall reasoning is that existing regimes still matter but are under pressure from geopolitical competition, enforcement gaps, and technological change. Policy-wise, the implication is to pair deterrence with renewed diplomacy: strengthen treaty frameworks, tighten coordinated sanctions and verification, and update rules for new strategic domains before instability worsens.

    Read at CFR

  721. 721.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, United States

    The event argues that worsening humanitarian crises are being driven less by isolated emergencies and more by a structural geopolitical shift from a rules-based order to transactional power politics. Drawing on the IRC’s 2026 Emergency Watchlist, it highlights severe stress signals: rising conflict, extreme food insecurity, and mass displacement alongside declining aid and weakening international cooperation. A key indicator is concentration of risk, with 20 Watchlist countries accounting for 84% of global humanitarian need despite representing only 12% of the world’s population, increasing spillover pressures beyond their borders. The policy implication is that governments and donors should pair near-term protection of vulnerable communities with reforms that build a more resilient, sustainable humanitarian system under conditions of persistent great-power competition.

    Read at Chatham House

  722. 722.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    Syria’s foreign minister argued that the post-Assad government is pursuing a pragmatic foreign policy centered on international reintegration, regional de-escalation, and reconstruction through investment rather than ideological confrontation. He cited high-level outreach to Washington and London, partial sanctions relief, embassy reactivation, and active diplomacy on files such as chemical weapons, refugee return, and security arrangements with Israel (including reviving the 1974 disengagement framework) as evidence of progress. He also framed internal stabilization efforts, including dialogue with the SDF and investigative mechanisms for sectarian violence, as prerequisites for restoring trust and attracting capital. The strategic implication is that external partners have an opening to shape Syria’s trajectory by pairing economic and diplomatic engagement with clear expectations on inclusivity, accountability, and institutional consolidation to reduce risks of renewed fragmentation and proxy competition.

    Read at Chatham House

  723. 723.
    2026-02-22 | energy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Trade

    The article argues that the Munich Security Conference is underweighting climate and environmental risks, even though they are structural drivers of instability and should be treated as core security priorities. It points to climate’s reduced visibility in the 2026 MSC agenda and report, parallel downgrading in other fora, and country cases (including Haiti, Yemen, and Myanmar) where degraded livelihoods, water stress, and climate shocks worsened violence and undermined ceasefires. The author’s reasoning is that security analysis, conflict resolution, and peacebuilding fail when they ignore land, water, food, and energy pressures that shape grievances and state legitimacy. Policy-wise, it calls for embedding land restoration, water access, and climate-resilient livelihoods into stabilization and reconstruction, and advancing practical regional cooperation (e.g., EU, OSCE, NATO, AU) where global consensus is weak.

    Read at Chatham House

  724. 724.

    The discussion argues that oil will remain a central geopolitical risk through the near term, even as countries pursue decarbonization, because global demand is still above 100 million barrels per day and continues to rise. Kissane cites evidence that Russia’s war in Ukraine and OPEC+ production cuts have remapped trade flows, tightened supply, and sustained price volatility, while major buyers such as China and India absorb discounted Russian crude. She also notes that energy power is concentrated in a few producers and state-owned firms, with over 75% of global oil controlled by national companies, amplifying political leverage in markets. The strategic implication is that governments should pair energy-transition goals with hard energy-security planning: diversify suppliers, protect critical transport infrastructure, manage strategic reserves prudently, and avoid removing conventional supply faster than resilient alternatives can scale.

    Read at CFR

  725. 725.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, United States

    The article argues that recent military and political moves in Syria have delivered a major strategic setback to Kurdish self-rule, while leaving only limited, conditional gains. Damascus’s January offensive pushed the SDF back, defections accelerated Kurdish losses, and subsequent agreements on 18 and 30 January forced Kurdish integration into state structures while conceding key assets like oil fields, border crossings, and Qamishli airport. Although the later deal preserved some Kurdish representation and localized institutional staffing, the broader trend is toward a centralized Syrian state backed by Washington, Ankara, and Gulf states, with fragile trust over implementation. For policy, this implies prioritizing monitoring and enforcement of Kurdish rights commitments, anticipating renewed center-periphery friction, and accounting for both Kurdish political vulnerability and rising cross-border Kurdish solidarity.

    Read at Chatham House

  726. 726.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East

    The paper argues that Syria’s post-Assad transition hinges on whether fragmented armed factions can be integrated into a credible national security architecture, and that the HTS-led interim authorities’ current approach is producing serious risks. It supports this by tracing the rapid collapse of the Assad regime in late 2024, HTS’s consolidation of control in early 2025, and subsequent violence on the coast and sectarian clashes in the south that expose weaknesses in force integration and command legitimacy. The report also maps the major armed actors (HTS, SDF, SNA, NLF, Islamic State, and regime remnants) and shows how their differing ideologies, structures, and funding streams complicate unification. Strategically, it implies that policymakers should prioritize inclusive, sequenced security-sector reform with external coordination, because narrow, faction-dominated integration is likely to fuel renewed instability and regional contestation.

    Read at IISS

  727. 727.

    Chatham House’s event framing argues that the UK’s new Critical Minerals Strategy is centered on reducing supply-chain vulnerability while preserving international openness. The core reasoning is that critical minerals are now indispensable to UK manufacturing, clean energy deployment, and industrial competitiveness, but exposure to geopolitical rivalry and demand shocks creates strategic risk. The strategy therefore combines domestic capability-building with deeper political and commercial collaboration with partner countries and industry actors. For policy, this implies a dual-track approach: strengthen national resilience at home while institutionalizing trusted international partnerships to secure long-term access in a contested global minerals market.

    Read at Chatham House

  728. 728.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The article argues that the Trump administration is sprinting toward a military conflict with Iran without a clear casus belli or exit strategy, risking a repeat of past Middle East intervention failures. It highlights how justifications have shifted from nuclear concerns to ballistic missiles and internal protests, often driven by Israeli pressure and policy inertia rather than imminent threats to the United States. The author contends that since Iran's ability to harm American interests is minimal, pursuing an unprovoked war would serve foreign interests over domestic ones and likely lead to an open-ended regional crisis.

    Read at CATO

  729. 729.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Climate, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The event’s core argument is that violent extremism in West Africa cannot be contained by national responses because insecurity from the Lake Chad Basin to western Mali is fundamentally cross-border. Speakers point to the erosion of regional mechanisms after coups in the central Sahel, with stalled cooperation on hot pursuit, joint operations, intelligence sharing, and disruption of illicit finance, while Mali’s fuel blockade illustrates hard economic-security interdependence for landlocked states. The discussion suggests that parallel security blocs alone will be insufficient unless trust is rebuilt between Sahel and coastal states through practical bilateral and regional arrangements. Policy priorities therefore include restoring interoperable regional frameworks, creating confidence-building mechanisms among governments, and pairing military coordination with strategies that address underlying political and socio-economic drivers of insecurity.

    Read at Chatham House

  730. 730.

    CFR panelists argued that while Greenland is strategically important for Arctic warning, surveillance, and transatlantic security, U.S. ownership is not necessary to secure core defense interests. They cited the still-valid 1951 U.S.-Denmark defense framework, which already allows expanded U.S. basing and operations, and noted that practical constraints—harsh operating conditions, limited infrastructure, and high costs—undercut both military seizure scenarios and rapid resource exploitation. On critical minerals, speakers stressed that Greenland has potential but development cycles are long, financing is market-driven, and cooperation with allies (especially Denmark, Canada, and Europe) is more realistic than unilateral control. Strategically, the discussion suggests Washington should prioritize negotiated security upgrades and allied supply-chain partnerships, since coercive moves on Greenland would risk damaging NATO cohesion and broader U.S.-Europe coordination.

    Read at CFR

  731. 731.
    2026-02-22 | energy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States

    The article argues that while international climate agreements like the Paris Accord have fostered diplomacy, current national commitments remain insufficient to prevent dangerous global warming, a situation exacerbated by the United States' recent withdrawal from UN climate bodies. Evidence indicates that global temperatures already breached the 1.5°C threshold in 2024, and the U.S. departure from the UNFCCC significantly reduces the organization's funding while signaling a domestic return to fossil fuel prioritization. Consequently, the lack of U.S. participation is expected to delay the global transition to net-zero, forcing a strategic shift toward alternative frameworks like universal carbon pricing and minilateral cooperation through the G20.

    Read at CFR

  732. 732.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    Chatham House argues that the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack and Israel’s subsequent Gaza campaign exposed a fundamental failure in long-running international policy on the Israel–Palestine conflict. The core finding is that regional normalization and economic engagement with Israel were pursued while the Palestine question was sidelined, making the overall approach unstable. The article reasons that international actors, including major donors and the United States, deprioritized peace-process work, settlement expansion, Palestinian governance and accountability, and societal bridge-building, which deepened structural drivers of conflict. For policy strategy, it implies that durable stability requires re-centering these root issues rather than relying on crisis management or normalization alone.

    Read at Chatham House

  733. 733.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    Chatham House argues that the February 6 India-US tariff deal marks only a partial reset, while New Delhi continues its long-standing strategy of hedging rather than aligning fully with Washington. Although US tariffs on India reportedly fell from 50% to 18% in exchange for major Indian purchase commitments and a pledge to stop Russian oil imports, implementation remains ambiguous because Indian state refiners still buy Russian crude and enforcement details are unclear. The article also notes political and economic constraints on both sides, including India’s sensitivity over agriculture, uncertainty over alternative oil supply, and persistent risk that the US could reimpose tariffs. Strategically, India is likely to keep diversifying trade, energy, and defense ties across multiple partners, implying a more transactional India-US relationship with limited US leverage over India’s broader foreign-policy autonomy.

    Read at Chatham House

  734. 734.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East

    The memorandum argues that rebuilding Gaza after the October 7 war requires more than disarmament and infrastructure repair; it requires a deliberate "de-Hamasification" process to dismantle Hamas’s ideological and institutional dominance. INSS contends that Western deradicalization templates (e.g., postwar Germany and Japan) are poorly suited to Gaza’s current social and political conditions, and instead highlights contemporary Arab "civic-transformative" models as more applicable. Its reasoning emphasizes a combined approach: sustained security demilitarization, Arab-led religious and political legitimization, re-education toward tolerance, and economic rehabilitation tied to a credible political horizon. Strategically, the paper implies that Israel and regional partners should pursue an integrated security-political-religious framework to build a durable post-Hamas governing alternative and reduce long-term instability.

    Read at INSS

  735. 735.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East

    Chatham House argues that Trump’s Gaza peace framework could entrench Palestinian fragmentation rather than resolve the conflict, resulting in a depoliticized enclave and a permanently weakened statehood project. It contends that UNSCR 2803 places decision-making in externally controlled bodies with minimal Palestinian authority, while treating statehood as conditional and deferring meaningful political integration of Gaza and the West Bank until at least December 31, 2027. The analysis further cites the Kushner-led redevelopment approach and reconstruction sequencing in Israeli-controlled areas as likely to create “two Gazas,” alongside accelerating de facto West Bank annexation through Israeli policy measures. The policy implication is that Arab and European governments should not back implementation unconditionally, but instead push for binding safeguards linking Gaza and the West Bank, rights-based UN parameters, and credible consequences for annexation.

    Read at Chatham House

  736. 736.
    2026-02-22 | society | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    INSS argues that Israel can economically absorb a gradual reduction in direct U.S. military aid, but the strategic and political value of the aid framework remains significant. It notes that aid now equals only about 0.5% of Israel’s GDP yet still funds roughly 15% of the defense budget, while stricter aid terms increasingly route spending to U.S. procurement and reduce direct support for Israeli industry. The paper also stresses that aid functions as a strategic anchor for U.S.-Israel ties and access to advanced U.S. systems, even as bipartisan support in the United States has weakened and aid has become more politically contested. It recommends replacing the current model with a formal transition toward defense-industrial partnership, avoiding full dollar-for-dollar budget replacement, and using the shift to drive efficiency, prioritization, and domestic capability building.

    Read at INSS

  737. 737.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    The article argues that the Trump administration’s reliance on "limited" military force against Iran is a strategic illusion that risks initiating an open-ended "forever war." It highlights that while airpower and covert actions minimize immediate American casualties, they frequently result in severe second-order effects like regional instability, refugee crises, and radicalization, as seen in past interventions in Libya and Syria. Ultimately, the author suggests that the administration should prioritize a diplomatic agreement with Tehran to avoid the very type of protracted conflict the president pledged to avoid.

    Read at CATO

  738. 738.
    2026-02-22 | society | 2026-W08 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Europe, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The report argues that America’s long-term decline in marriage and fertility is a civilizational threat and that restoring stable married-parent families is essential to national renewal. It cites historical trends and social-science findings linking two-parent married households with better child outcomes, lower poverty and crime, and stronger economic and civic performance, while blaming welfare marriage penalties, cultural shifts, and institutional incentives for family breakdown. Strategically, it recommends a whole-of-government pro-family agenda: remove welfare and tax marriage penalties, strengthen work requirements, reduce regulatory and housing barriers, expand religion- and family-supportive policies, and create new marriage-centered incentives (FAM/HCE credits and NEST accounts). The implication is a shift from neutral or symptom-management policy toward explicit state preference for marriage and child-rearing within intact families as a national policy objective.

    Read at Heritage

  739. 739.
    2026-02-22 | diplomacy | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    At CFR’s 2025 Arthur Ross Book Award ceremony, the central discussion around Steve Coll’s The Achilles Trap argued that the Iraq War stemmed not only from U.S. analytic and policy failures but from a profound misreading of Saddam Hussein’s motives and decision logic. Drawing on newly accessible Iraqi archives, tapes of Saddam’s internal meetings, and interviews, Coll showed that Saddam had largely dismantled key WMD capabilities in 1991 yet preserved ambiguity out of regime psychology, deterrence signaling, and distrust that sanctions would be lifted even with cooperation. The conversation emphasized that U.S. policymakers over-relied on partial intelligence and assumptions, while limited direct contact with Baghdad deepened strategic misperception. The policy implication is to prioritize adversary psychology, maintain calibrated channels of communication with hostile regimes, and apply greater analytic humility before irreversible military decisions.

    Read at CFR

  740. 740.

    Robert D. Blackwill proposes "resolute global leadership" as the most effective American grand strategy to counter a peer-competitor China and navigate the most dangerous international environment since World War II. The report analyzes five alternative strategic schools, concluding that the U.S. must leverage its unique economic, military, and technological advantages while reconciling itself to a world where its dominance is no longer unchallenged. Key policy recommendations include substantially increasing the defense budget, pivoting military assets to the Indo-Pacific, and re-engaging in multilateral trade frameworks like the CPTPP to revitalize the rules-based order. Ultimately, it emphasizes balancing Chinese power through strengthened alliances and 'peace through strength,' while rejecting military force for purely ideological goals.

    Read at CFR

  741. 741.

    The Chatham House panel argued that shrinking Western aid budgets are no longer just a development issue but a strategic security risk for the UK and its partners. Speakers cited sharp cuts across major donors, disruption from the 2025 USAID retrenchment, and operational impacts such as HALO Trust potentially shrinking from 12,000 to 7,000 staff, warning this will hit fragile and conflict-affected states hardest. They reasoned that reduced support for conflict prevention, multilateral institutions, and long-term partnerships creates space for rival influence, increases instability and migration pressures, and weakens UK diplomatic leverage. For UK strategy, the discussion pointed to prioritizing conflict-focused aid, preserving credible multilateral engagement while using targeted bilateral strengths, rebuilding a clear long-term narrative linking aid to domestic security, and mobilizing non-traditional and private financing to offset fiscal constraints.

    Read at Chatham House

  742. 742.

    Brookings’ expert roundtable argues that a U.S. "Donroe Doctrine" push for hemispheric primacy is more likely to weaken than strengthen Washington’s position in long-term competition with China, though one contributor contends it could restore deterrence by denying Beijing footholds near U.S. borders. The dominant reasoning is that coercive regional tactics and unilateral moves drain U.S. military bandwidth from the Indo-Pacific, damage alliances, and erode soft power while giving China narrative and diplomatic advantages. Experts also note China’s already deep regional footprint, including major trade, investment, and infrastructure ties across Latin America, which makes a clean spheres-of-influence rollback unrealistic. Strategically, a formal U.S.-China spheres bargain is assessed as unstable and asymmetric: it could pressure smaller states to hedge, accelerate regional militarization and possible nuclear proliferation, and incentivize revisionist claims elsewhere, suggesting U.S. policy should prioritize alliance credibility, rules-based coordination, and positive economic alternatives over coercion.

    Read at Brookings

  743. 743.
    2026-02-21 | defense | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The conflict in Ukraine has settled into a prolonged pattern of attrition and positional fighting, with neither side achieving a decisive breakthrough. While Russia retains tactical advantages, the analysis suggests that time is working against Moscow due to increasing manpower strain and operational failures, preventing the attainment of key objectives like fully securing Donetsk. Strategically, the fighting itself informs the relative leverage of both parties, meaning that external diplomatic pressure to impose a cease-fire is unlikely to succeed. Policymakers must recognize that the war is not nearing a quick end and that sustained, long-term support is required to manage a protracted conflict.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  744. 744.

    The publication argues that while the transatlantic alliance faces deep rifts due to US political volatility, the commitment to the partnership remains strong. Allies must adapt by adopting a strategy of assertive self-reliance, recognizing that they can no longer solely depend on the United States for security. This requires enhancing mutual burden-sharing and maintaining robust trade ties while simultaneously holding firm on national interests. The path forward demands a strategic shift from passive appeasement to a proactive, mutually beneficial partnership that asserts the sovereignty of all involved parties.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  745. 745.

    This RAND report argues that systemic supply chain risks from geopolitical conflict are significant and underappreciated, particularly in sectors like nonferrous metals and electrical components sourced from countries such as Brazil and India. The authors find that private insurance is ill-suited for managing these correlated, large-scale risks, while government interventions often lack necessary market-sensing mechanisms to prevent unsustainable private practices. To enhance resilience, the report recommends that the U.S. government track conflict-dependency overlaps and that industries adopt 'Til Needed' hedging options—private contracts for surge capacity—to bridge the gap between market incentives and national economic security.

    Read at RAND

  746. 746.
    2026-02-17 | middle_east | 2026-W08 | Topics: Cybersecurity, Middle East, Trade, United States

    The Abraham Accords have successfully formalized significant bilateral relations, allowing Israel and Gulf states to deepen cooperation in advanced technology, defense, and trade. While these agreements have allowed the Gulf monarchies to improve their international standing and secure economic benefits, the accords are not a comprehensive path to regional peace. The primary limitation remains the failure to address the core Palestinian question, which severely constrains the accords' potential for broader political stability. Policymakers should view the accords as valuable tools for targeted economic and security cooperation rather than a solution to the fundamental regional conflict.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  747. 747.
    2026-02-17 | middle_east | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article presents a scathing critique of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, arguing that the pursuit of a U.S.-centric order since the Cold War has resulted in regional ruination. Key evidence points to the failure to resolve the core Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which allowed the U.S. to justify prolonged involvement through failed 'peace processes.' This neglect led to disastrous policies, including interventions in Iraq and Syria, and support for actions like the Gaza assault, all of which ignored regional public opinion and undermined democracy promotion. Policymakers must fundamentally reassess their strategy, moving away from unilateral imposition of order and recognizing the need for genuine regional stability.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  748. 748.
    2026-02-17 | middle_east | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East

    The article argues that the traditional two-state solution is an unworkable policy goal for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Instead, the authors propose that substantive negotiations must be preceded by addressing systemic violations of international law and discriminatory policies that create power disparities. This requires considerable international pressure, particularly on Israel, to force concessions and implement reforms, such as security sector changes. The core implication is that policymakers must shift their strategy from negotiating borders to enforcing international accountability to create a genuine foundation for peace.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  749. 749.
    2026-02-17 | china_indopacific | 2026-W08 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, United States

    The article posits that the international system is at a crossroads, facing a choice between a multipolar world of competing spheres of influence (Yalta logic) or an open, cooperative multilateral order (Helsinki logic). This contest is defined by three major coalitions: the 'Global West' (US, Europe, Japan), the 'Global East' (China, Russia), and the pivotal 'Global South.' The Global South is identified as the decisive factor in determining the future global order. Policymakers are advised that the West must adopt a strategy of 'pragmatic realism,' engaging with both the East and the South to rebuild a rules-based global system centered on the UN.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  750. 750.
    2026-02-17 | middle_east | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    Jordan is frequently misrepresented as a simple geopolitical footnote, but the analysis reveals it is a highly urbanized state grappling with profound internal contradictions. The country's stability is underpinned by a vast, intrusive security apparatus, while economic growth, fueled by foreign aid, has failed to mitigate rapidly widening inequality and deep poverty. Furthermore, hosting more refugees than any other nation places immense strain on its resources and social fabric. Policymakers must therefore look beyond narratives of royal resilience and focus instead on addressing these deep structural issues of poverty and demographic strain to understand Jordan's true stability risks.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  751. 751.
    2026-02-17 | middle_east | 2026-W08 | Topics: Middle East

    The analysis argues that the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states are not monolithic, challenging the common perception of them as indistinguishable absolute monarchies. It provides a detailed, comparative look at the diverse internal dynamics, examining everything from parliamentary politics (Kuwait) and sovereign wealth fund ambitions (Saudi Arabia) to varying approaches to popular representation and opposition. This deep dive reveals significant variation in the resources, strategies, and governance models employed by these powerful ruling families. Policymakers must therefore avoid generalizing about the region, instead tailoring their strategies to account for the unique political and institutional dynamics of each individual Gulf state.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  752. 752.

    This RAND report argues that current U.S. export controls for AI and uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) are lagging behind rapid technological advancements and require a more agile, data-centric interagency approach. The study finds that the U.S. no longer maintains a technological monopoly, meaning overly restrictive controls risk hollowing out the domestic industrial base and driving global partners toward Chinese alternatives. Consequently, the authors recommend shifting regulatory focus toward specialized military training data rather than ubiquitous hardware, while calling for increased funding and technical expertise for the Bureau of Industry and Security.

    Read at RAND

  753. 753.
    2026-02-11 | tech | 2026-W07 | Topics: AI, Climate, Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

    RAND developed a dual-axis risk-scoring tool to evaluate the biosecurity threats posed by AI-enabled biological design, focusing on five critical viral functions such as host range and transmission dynamics. The framework assesses both the potential severity of biological modifications and the technical capability required by actors, specifically measuring the 'uplift' that advancing AI provides to lower-skilled individuals. Researchers concluded that as AI tools become more accessible, the technical barriers to engineering dangerous pathogens will continue to decrease, necessitating new oversight mechanisms. Consequently, the report proposes using this scoring system as a foundation for establishing regulatory redlines and federal funding requirements to manage AI-driven biological risks without stifling innovation.

    Read at RAND

  754. 754.
    2026-02-06 | middle_east | 2026-W06 | Topics: Middle East

    The escalating rift between Saudi Arabia and the UAE represents a significant source of regional instability. The rivalry, which intensified following clashes over Yemen, has seen Saudi media accuse the UAE of destabilizing North Africa and acting as a proxy for Israel. Analysts warn that this public discord is merely the surface manifestation of deeper, unresolved geopolitical tensions. The continued friction between these two major Gulf powers suggests sustained volatility and complicates regional security planning.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  755. 755.

    President Stubb argues that the current global environment is undergoing a 'transition' rather than a 'rupture,' warning that abandoning multilateralism risks descending into chaotic spheres of influence. He posits that the existing international order, built on rules and institutions, has been highly beneficial and must be reformed to give greater agency to non-founding powers (e.g., expanding the UN Security Council). For policy, the key strategy is to strengthen transatlantic cooperation—particularly in defense and technology—while simultaneously reforming global institutions to ensure that multilateralism remains the dominant framework, thereby stabilizing the global system.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  756. 756.
    2026-02-05 | americas | 2026-W06 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    Despite publicly campaigning on a platform of ending wars and serving as a 'president of peace,' the article highlights a stark contradiction in Donald Trump's recent behavior. Evidence suggests a significant shift toward hawkish policies, citing recent actions such as bombing foreign countries, sinking ships in the Caribbean, and massing naval forces near Iran. This divergence implies that the administration's actual strategic posture is moving away from withdrawal and isolationism toward increased military confrontation and overt geopolitical engagement.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  757. 757.
    2026-02-04 | middle_east | 2026-W06 | Topics: Middle East, Trade, United States

    The article highlights a dramatic and unexpected political transformation in Syria, defying traditional geopolitical predictions of instability. This shift is exemplified by Ahmed al-Shara, a former extremist, who has not only overthrown a decades-old dictatorship but has also achieved remarkable international rehabilitation. His success includes convincing Western powers to lift sanctions, securing billions in foreign investment, and joining the U.S.-led coalition against ISIS. These developments suggest that Syria is rapidly pivoting toward a period of stabilization and deep integration into global economic and security frameworks, necessitating a reassessment of regional policy.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  758. 758.
    2026-02-02 | middle_east | 2026-W06 | Topics: Middle East

    The article outlines a comprehensive, two-phased peace plan for Gaza, arguing that lasting stability requires significant international leverage. Phase Two mandates a complex transition involving the establishment of a technocratic Palestinian governing authority, the deployment of an international stabilization force, and the disarmament of Hamas. This plan also includes the reconstruction of Gaza and the withdrawal of the Israel Defense Forces. The success of this multi-faceted approach is presented as the critical determinant for achieving a sustainable end to the conflict and restoring regional order.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  759. 759.
    2026-01-31 | middle_east | 2026-W05 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Nuclear

    The article argues that the U.S. has a historic opportunity to fundamentally reshape the standoff with Iran, particularly if Donald Trump returns to office. This leverage is based on Iran's current vulnerabilities, including an economy suffering from sanctions and mismanagement, and a significantly weakened regional proxy network following recent conflicts. Coupled with mounting public resentment within the Islamic Republic, Washington is positioned to exert considerable influence. Strategically, the U.S. should capitalize on these weaknesses to achieve a profound transformation in the geopolitical relationship with Tehran.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  760. 760.
    2026-01-29 | china_indopacific | 2026-W05 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Beijing views the current U.S. policy toward China as a moment of strategic flux and opportunity, capitalizing on perceived inconsistency in Washington's approach. China is actively shifting from a reactive to an offensive posture, using economic tools like rare-earth controls and exerting pressure on U.S. allies to strengthen its global standing. Furthermore, the U.S.'s increased focus on the Western Hemisphere and Latin America is interpreted by Beijing as a strategic distraction, allowing China to dedicate greater resources and attention to the Indo-Pacific. Policymakers must recognize that this enduring rivalry persists despite short-term policy shifts, requiring a nuanced strategy that addresses China's proactive regional ambitions.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  761. 761.
    2026-01-29 | middle_east | 2026-W05 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Nuclear, Middle East

    The analysis identifies the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan as the most critical flashpoint in South Asia, surpassing the immediate threat posed by India-Pakistan tensions. Pakistan accuses the Taliban regime of harboring militant groups, particularly the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which continues to launch cross-border attacks. This persistent, simmering conflict threatens regional stability and has damaging consequences for the wider area. Policymakers must address this cross-border security issue, as the failure to stabilize the Afghan-Pakistani relationship risks escalating regional violence.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  762. 762.

    China's economic statecraft is proving highly effective, primarily by capitalizing on the protectionist and volatile foreign economic policies of the United States. Beijing employs a sophisticated 'carrot and stick' strategy, using advanced export controls against rivals while simultaneously offering attractive development financing and cheap goods to the Global South. This dual approach is successfully embedding many developing nations into Chinese-dominated supply chains, as seen in critical sectors like nickel and EVs. Consequently, China gains significant global leverage, enabling it to advance its domestic and foreign policies with minimal international opposition, posing a growing challenge to Western economic influence.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  763. 763.
    2026-01-23 | middle_east | 2026-W04 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article posits that achieving a sustainable peace and successfully disarming Hamas requires efforts far beyond a temporary cease-fire. While initial agreements, such as the recent cease-fire, represent a significant diplomatic achievement, they are only considered 'phase one' of a comprehensive peace plan. The core reasoning suggests that the transition from conflict to stability demands sustained, difficult negotiations. Consequently, policy efforts must shift focus from merely stopping fighting to implementing deep, structural agreements that ensure long-term peace and disarmament.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  764. 764.
    2026-01-22 | middle_east | 2026-W04 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article argues that adopting a fatalistic approach to the future of Gaza is unrealistic, suggesting that stability cannot be achieved through passive waiting or external mandates alone. The current peace framework, which relies on a U.S.-led Board of Peace and an International Stabilization Force following the dissolution of Hamas, is highly complex and fragile. The analysis implies that while international intervention is necessary, sustainable peace requires a fundamental shift toward empowering local governance and fostering genuine political will among the Palestinian populace. Policymakers must therefore move beyond simply managing external security forces and instead focus on building self-sustaining, localized institutions to prevent future collapse.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  765. 765.
    2026-01-22 | middle_east | 2026-W04 | Topics: Middle East

    Despite facing massive internal protests from hundreds of thousands of citizens, the Iranian regime has demonstrated unexpected internal cohesion. The key finding is that the elite, including both reformist and hardline factions, is working in concert to suppress dissent, showing no objection to the security forces' use of lethal force against civilians. This unity suggests that the regime's internal structure is more resilient than previously assessed. Policymakers should therefore adjust expectations regarding the speed or ease of a regime collapse, as internal fracturing remains unlikely based on current elite behavior.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  766. 766.
    2026-01-15 | middle_east | 2026-W03 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article analyzes the escalating internal crisis in Iran, noting widespread protests and a rapidly mounting death toll challenging the Islamic Republic regime. The analysis highlights that the Iranian people's defiance is occurring amidst a complex geopolitical environment, with U.S. rhetoric regarding potential military intervention implicated in the protests' outcome. The core finding is that American influence is reaching its limits, suggesting that external pressure may be exacerbating rather than resolving internal instability. Policymakers must therefore exercise caution, recognizing that overt U.S. involvement could have unpredictable and destabilizing effects on regional dynamics.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  767. 767.
    2026-01-14 | middle_east | 2026-W03 | Topics: NATO, United States, Middle East

    The article argues that direct U.S. attempts at regime change have historically proven disastrous and unsustainable. Key evidence cited includes the Taliban's return to power in Afghanistan and the disproportionate human and economic costs incurred by the U.S. in Iraq. These interventions often fail to produce stable or commensurate strategic outcomes, regardless of the initial humanitarian goals. Policymakers should therefore reassess the viability of grand, direct intervention strategies, suggesting a shift toward more limited or alternative forms of engagement.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  768. 768.
    2026-01-13 | middle_east | 2026-W03 | Topics: Middle East, United States

    The article posits that the Iranian regime is facing critical instability due to mounting internal dissent and external pressure. Key evidence includes thousands of citizens protesting the authoritarian government, leading to a rising death toll, while the regime responds with violence and internet blackouts. This internal crisis is compounded by the threat of military strikes from the U.S., which has vowed intervention if repression continues. The combination of widespread unrest and potential foreign military action suggests a highly volatile and deteriorating security situation in the region, signaling a high risk of regime collapse.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  769. 769.
    2026-01-13 | middle_east | 2026-W03 | Topics: China, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Trade, United States

    The analysis concludes that the Islamic Republic of Iran is a 'zombie regime' whose ideological and economic foundations are failing, making the current status quo unsustainable. The mounting, nationwide protests are fueled by deep political, economic, and social grievances that transcend traditional ethnic or class divides. Crucially, the regime's core anti-Western ideology is losing legitimacy as the population increasingly prioritizes national reclamation and stability over foreign-directed conflict. Policymakers should anticipate that while the regime may use violence to delay its collapse, the underlying grievances will persist, suggesting a profound and complex transition away from the current theocratic structure.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  770. 770.
    2026-01-13 | diplomacy | 2026-W03 | Topics: Middle East, United States, Diplomacy

    The article argues that the rhetoric of Donald Trump signals a dangerous and troubling lack of commitment to the established international legal order. Key evidence cited includes his erratic and sweeping threats—such as annexing Canada or claiming ownership of the Panama Canal—which, despite being dismissed initially, carry significant damage. The implication for policy is that this rhetoric undermines the foundational legal structures that the United States and its allies have relied upon for decades, suggesting a potential destabilization of global norms and cooperation.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  771. 771.
    2026-01-08 | energy | 2026-W02 | Topics: China, Europe, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States, Energy

    The removal of Nicolás Maduro has created a precarious power vacuum, forcing the Venezuelan regime into an existential dilemma between outright defiance and pragmatic collaboration with the United States. The analysis suggests the regime's primary focus is survival, making the retention of power—rather than democratic reform—its critical 'redline.' While the U.S. demands center on material gains, particularly control over oil resources, the current trajectory risks establishing a semi-colonial state. Consequently, the U.S. strategy is unlikely to yield a long-term political solution, as the opposition remains excluded from any table of negotiation.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  772. 772.
    2026-01-01 | china_indopacific | 2026-W01 | Topics: China, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that characterizing the current US-China relationship solely through Cold War analogies is inaccurate and dangerous, as the global system is fundamentally multipolar and highly integrated economically. Westad notes that unlike the bipolar Cold War era, great powers now compete within a single, interconnected global economic framework. While historical lessons—such as the necessity of dialogue, mutual respect, and strategic deterrence—remain crucial for managing crises, policymakers must acknowledge the unprecedented complexity of this modern, interconnected order. Therefore, strategy must balance great power competition with mechanisms for sustained communication to prevent conflict.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  773. 773.
    2025-12-31 | china_indopacific | 2026-W01 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the United States and China are uniquely positioned to forge a 'grand bargain' to stabilize the global order, shifting from ideological confrontation to productive coexistence. This opportunity is driven by the recognition that both nations benefit from a multipolar world and are deeply economically interdependent. To prevent a high-risk conflict, the policy strategy must pivot toward pragmatic cooperation, requiring the reform of the international system. Implementing this bargain necessitates establishing reciprocal agreements on trade, technology, and security to ensure peaceful power sharing and mutual benefit.

    Read at Foreign Affairs