The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
US foreign policy
English Summary
Chatham House argues that US global influence remains substantial but is increasingly perceived as declining, particularly in economic terms, as China, India and Russia gain weight. The analysis points to policy volatility and experimentation across major dossiers, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Paris climate accord, the Iran nuclear deal, and relations with the EU, Russia and North Korea. At the same time, persistent transnational challenges such as trade, climate change, nuclear risk and terrorism are presented as areas where US engagement is still indispensable. The strategic implication is that Washington’s credibility will depend less on unilateral dominance and more on consistent, coalition-based leadership in managing shared global risks.
中文摘要
研究所認為，美國的全球影響力仍然可觀，但外界愈發認為其影響力正在下降，尤其在經濟層面；與此同時，中國、印度與俄羅斯的分量上升。分析指出，美國在多項重大議題上的政策呈現波動與試驗性調整，包括《跨太平洋夥伴協定》、巴黎氣候協定、伊朗核協議，以及與歐盟、俄羅斯和北韓的關係。與此同時，貿易、氣候變遷、核風險與恐怖主義等持續性的跨國挑戰，仍被視為美國參與不可或缺的領域。其戰略意涵在於：華盛頓的可信度將較少取決於單邊主導，而更取決於能否以一致且以聯盟為基礎的領導方式，管理共同的全球風險。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.