The conflict in Ukraine has evolved into a protracted 'war of endurance,' significantly exceeding Russia's initial objectives of quick subjugation. The conflict is characterized as Europe's largest conventional war since World War II, marked by its longevity and immense human cost. This sustained nature suggests that the conflict is less about rapid military victory and more about attrition and geopolitical resilience. Policy implications necessitate a long-term strategic commitment from international partners, recognizing that the war's endurance requires sustained support across military, economic, and diplomatic fronts.
2026-W08
This digest page is part of ThinkTankWeekly's portal index. It summarizes notable reports and links readers to the original source websites.
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the initial Western objective of restoring Ukraine's full pre-2022 sovereignty over all internationally recognized territory has become strategically implausible. This shift in goal is attributed to the failure of Ukraine's 2023 counteroffensive, which forced Western leaders to concede a new reality. Consequently, policy and strategy must pivot away from demanding full territorial restoration and instead focus on a more pragmatic, negotiated settlement that accepts Russia's de facto control over occupied regions. This suggests a necessary re-evaluation of victory conditions for international support.
-
3.The Upside of U.S.-Chinese Strategic Competition: Institutional Balancing and Order Transition in the Asia Pacific (Foreign Affairs)
The analysis argues that U.S.-Chinese strategic competition is unlikely to escalate into military conflict due to nuclear deterrence and deep economic interdependence. Instead, the rivalry is channeled through multilateral institutions, which forces constructive reforms and generates positive regional dividends. Key evidence includes China's establishment of the AIIB, which spurred reform in other development banks, and the subsequent strengthening of organizations like ASEAN and the UN. Policymakers should view this great-power competition not merely as a source of friction, but as a powerful, albeit challenging, mechanism driving institutional balancing and positive order transition across the Asia Pacific.
-
4.
The analysis argues that India's rapid, elite-driven economic growth is undermining democratic foundations by fueling deep economic and social inequalities. This dynamic allows the ruling BJP to consolidate power by simultaneously appealing to economic elites through pro-business policies and mobilizing cultural majoritarianism. While democratic institutions remain nominally intact, the report warns that civil society and the opposition are currently too weak to counter the combined force of concentrated capital and entrenched social hierarchies. This suggests that structural economic imbalances pose a significant long-term risk to India's democratic stability.
-
5.
Jordan is frequently misrepresented as a simple geopolitical footnote, but the analysis reveals it is a highly urbanized state grappling with profound internal contradictions. The country's stability is underpinned by a vast, intrusive security apparatus, while economic growth, fueled by foreign aid, has failed to mitigate rapidly widening inequality and deep poverty. Furthermore, hosting more refugees than any other nation places immense strain on its resources and social fabric. Policymakers must therefore look beyond narratives of royal resilience and focus instead on addressing these deep structural issues of poverty and demographic strain to understand Jordan's true stability risks.
-
6.
The analysis challenges the notion that BRICS+ operates as a unified geopolitical counterweight to Western powers. Instead, the grouping functions as a highly fragmented forum where member states pursue diverse and often conflicting national interests. Evidence demonstrates this divergence: Russia and China leverage the platform for de-dollarization, while India uses it to press Beijing over border disputes, and nations like Indonesia hedge by engaging with multiple global bodies. Policymakers should therefore view the bloc not as a monolithic force, but as a complex, decentralized collection of rising powers whose collective action is limited by internal divisions and competing agendas.
-
7.The Range of the River: A Riverine History of Empire Across China, India, and Southeast Asia (Foreign Affairs)
The book argues that major Asian rivers are not merely geographical features but powerful geopolitical agents that have historically driven imperial competition and shaped regional cultures. While these waterways once represented shared resources, modern nation-states, particularly China and India, are increasingly transforming them into instruments of state power. This control is evidenced by the damming of flows and the restriction of navigation, effectively turning once-shared waterways into national borders. Policymakers must recognize this shift, as the weaponization of water resources and the militarization of river basins represent a growing source of regional instability and strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific.
-
8.
The analysis of Stoltenberg's NATO tenure argues that while the alliance successfully navigated multiple crises, its diplomatic efforts ultimately struggled against the overwhelming forces of great-power geopolitics. Key evidence shows that despite intense negotiations and increased defense spending, NATO was unable to prevent political drift (e.g., Trump's skepticism) or ensure timely, decisive material support for allies. The primary implication is that while collective defense remains vital, future NATO strategy must develop mechanisms to bridge the gap between political commitment and rapid, reliable military aid to ensure the stability and sovereignty of Eastern European partners.
-
9.
The war in Ukraine is characterized as a hybrid conflict, blending historical elements like static frontlines with unprecedented technological advancements. The key evidence cited is the broad and effective integration of modern technologies, including satellites, autonomous systems, and AI software, fundamentally changing the nature of warfare. For the United States, these trends are deeply concerning, suggesting that military doctrine must adapt to a high-tech environment rather than relying on assumptions of quick, decisive victory. America must therefore learn to navigate this complex technological battlefield to maintain strategic superiority.
-
10.
The analysis argues that the European Union has managed to survive major crises since 1989 not through resolving deep structural weaknesses, but by skillfully managing internal conflicts. Key evidence points to the survival of the euro, which the author attributes to member state leaders' political maneuvering despite underlying economic fragility. While the book concludes with a degree of optimism regarding Europe's future, the underlying assessment suggests that the continent's stability remains highly dependent on continuous political mediation and careful management of internal divisions and external geopolitical threats.
-
11.
The conflict in Ukraine demonstrates that modern great-power warfare is characterized by sustained, highly destructive conventional conflict and a fragile, elevated risk of nuclear escalation, rather than quick, decisive outcomes. While Russia's nuclear threats are significant, Ukraine's resilience and ability to strike deep into Russian territory show that nuclear weapons do not guarantee coercive leverage. Consequently, the U.S. must update its defense planning to prepare for protracted wars of attrition with nuclear-armed adversaries, focusing on strengthening deterrence, coordinating with allies, and maintaining readiness for extended, high-stakes conflicts.
-
12.
The current geopolitical focus of policymakers in Washington and Europe is overwhelmingly consumed by responding to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. This response has necessitated the provision of massive military, economic, and humanitarian aid to prevent Ukraine’s collapse. While the immediate crisis demands immense resources, the article suggests that this singular focus may obscure the preparation for future conflicts. Policymakers must therefore look beyond the current front lines to anticipate and mitigate emerging security threats across the broader European continent.
-
13.
The article argues that sustained technological progress requires a competitive, decentralized market system, contrasting this with top-down bureaucratic models best suited for scaling existing technologies. Historical examples show that nations like Great Britain and the US thrived through decentralized competition, while centralized systems (like late 19th-century Prussia) excelled at consolidation. Stagnation occurs when a society's political structure fails to adapt to new technological realities. The analysis warns that both China, due to centralized power, and the United States, due to stifled competition, face significant challenges in maintaining future growth.
-
14.
The Abraham Accords have successfully formalized significant bilateral relations, allowing Israel and Gulf states to deepen cooperation in advanced technology, defense, and trade. While these agreements have allowed the Gulf monarchies to improve their international standing and secure economic benefits, the accords are not a comprehensive path to regional peace. The primary limitation remains the failure to address the core Palestinian question, which severely constrains the accords' potential for broader political stability. Policymakers should view the accords as valuable tools for targeted economic and security cooperation rather than a solution to the fundamental regional conflict.
-
15.
The article argues that Donald Trump's decision to run again was primarily motivated by a desire to evade legal prosecution, making him a more focused and effective candidate than in 2016. Conversely, the Biden campaign is criticized for being unprepared and 'sleepwalking,' despite key advisors recognizing their candidate's weaknesses, which was highlighted during a catastrophic debate with Trump. The central finding suggests that the political landscape was not predetermined, but rather shaped by the candidates' reactive strategies and internal campaign failures. This points to a volatile domestic political environment where personal legal jeopardy, rather than traditional policy platforms, drives major electoral outcomes.
-
16.Dream the Size of Freedom: How African Liberation Mobilized New Left Internationalism (Foreign Affairs)
The analysis argues that African activists were the central force driving the end of Portuguese colonialism, challenging the conventional narrative that the empire's collapse was merely an unintended consequence of the 1974 Carnation Revolution. Key evidence highlights the role of robust transnational networks, which connected Lusophone liberation movements with radical Black Power and leftist groups across the Atlantic, particularly utilizing US university and church resources. For policy, this suggests that regional struggles for self-determination are not isolated events but are often mobilized by global ideological solidarity, requiring policymakers to recognize the transnational nature of modern anti-colonial movements.
-
17.The Institutionalization of Islam in Southern Senegal: Intermarriage, Qur’anic Education, and Jihad (Foreign Affairs)
The analysis challenges traditional views of Islamization in Southern Senegal, arguing that the process was not a sudden imposition by external missionaries. Instead, it posits that Islam developed through an evolutionary and inclusive process beginning in the 17th century. This early institutionalization was facilitated by Muslim pioneers, including Sufi mystics and jihadist warriors, who integrated into local life through intermarriage and hospitality. This reframing suggests that contemporary religious dynamics, including the rise of jihadism, must be understood as part of a long-term, localized historical evolution rather than an external rupture.
-
18.The Elimination: A Survivor of the Khmer Rouge Confronts His Past and the Commandant of the Killing Fields (Foreign Affairs)
This account examines the atrocities of the Khmer Rouge, arguing that the horrific violence was driven by individual choices and culpability, rather than merely systemic orders. Using personal narratives, the work details the suffering of victims and confronts perpetrators, such as Comrade Duch, who are shown to have actively chosen their path into becoming agents of violence. The central finding is that accountability must be focused on individual responsibility, emphasizing that perpetrators retained agency and choice even within a brutal regime. For policy, this underscores the critical importance of transitional justice mechanisms and individual criminal prosecution when addressing historical mass atrocities.
-
19.
The article argues that the traditional two-state solution is an unworkable policy goal for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Instead, the authors propose that substantive negotiations must be preceded by addressing systemic violations of international law and discriminatory policies that create power disparities. This requires considerable international pressure, particularly on Israel, to force concessions and implement reforms, such as security sector changes. The core implication is that policymakers must shift their strategy from negotiating borders to enforcing international accountability to create a genuine foundation for peace.
-
20.
The article argues that widening income inequality in the United Kingdom is creating a systemic crisis of deprivation, trapping families in a cycle of deteriorating living conditions. Key evidence points to unequal access to essential services—including childcare, medical care, and housing—with substandard public housing and mass state care facilities disproportionately affecting women, children, and racial minorities. The analysis suggests that the current social safety net is failing, noting that those in power are either unable or unwilling to address the systemic failures. Policy implications suggest that structural reforms are urgently needed to overhaul housing standards and combat the deep-seated social inequality.
-
21.
The analysis argues that the American Revolution should be viewed not as a unifying national event, but as a complex, global conflict. Key evidence reveals that the struggle was simultaneously a 'civil war' marked by deep internal divisions—such as between enslavers and the enslaved—and a 'world war' fueled by foreign powers like France and Spain. These external actors provided essential resources and launched global military actions, disrupting international trade patterns. For policy, this suggests that even seemingly localized conflicts are fundamentally interconnected, requiring an understanding of global resource flows and overlooked internal power dynamics to accurately assess geopolitical stability.
-
22.
The analysis argues that despite significant economic headwinds, including the real estate sector's implosion and high local government debt, China's political system remains robust and stable. This stability is attributed to Xi Jinping's firm control over all levers of power. Furthermore, the nation continues to demonstrate significant global competitiveness and even dominance in crucial 21st-century technologies, such as electric vehicles and biotechnology. These factors suggest that China's overall power projection remains formidable, challenging previous assumptions of imminent decline.
-
23.
The analysis argues that the impact of AI on warfare is not purely technological, but is instead shaped by complex social and political forces. Historically, the digital revolution was fueled by military contracts, leading Western armed forces to become dependent on private tech companies like Microsoft and Palantir. This reliance creates a significant tension, as these corporations possess global commercial interests that often conflict with strict national security mandates. Ultimately, the report concludes that AI is a decision-support tool for humans, implying that policy efforts must focus on managing the inherent conflict between the military-industrial complex and private corporate autonomy.
-
24.
The analysis of modern global power dynamics reveals significant difficulty in characterizing the foreign policy of key actors, such as Donald Trump, challenging traditional frameworks like liberal internationalism or pure realism. Initial interpretations often relied on the concept of 'great-power competition' to rationalize maneuvers, but recent evidence suggests a shift toward great powers colluding to carve up the world into distinct spheres of influence. This ambiguity signals a move away from predictable, rules-based order toward a more fragmented and unpredictable geopolitical landscape. Policymakers must therefore adjust strategies to account for this non-traditional, great-power competition and the resulting instability in global governance.
-
25.
Africa is emerging as a critical, yet under-discussed, arena for advanced digital surveillance, where foreign tech corporations are supplying sophisticated spyware, facial recognition, and AI tools. This technology is being deployed by increasingly authoritarian regimes across the continent, often with minimal oversight from weak domestic regulatory bodies or civil society. The resulting 'technological panopticon' empowers these governments to repress populations and collect personal data, frequently flouting existing privacy protections. This trend not only strengthens repressive state power but also funnels significant profits to foreign companies, posing a major challenge to human rights and democratic development across the region.
-
26.
The article argues that post-Cold War American foreign policy has been defined by an overreliance on projecting unmatched military and economic power to force global transformation. This strategy has manifested in two seemingly disparate approaches: promoting liberal institutions and free trade, or using military force for regime change and counter-terrorism. The core finding is that these two methods are fundamentally interconnected, suggesting a persistent and perhaps unsustainable pattern of interventionism. The implication is that the US's historical tendency to act as a global 'force for transformation' creates a strategic dilemma, or 'tragedy,' in defining its future role.
-
27.
The reviewed books analyze the 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union, arguing that the conflict was fundamentally ideological, pitting Nazi extermination goals against Soviet communism. One analysis highlights that Hitler viewed Jews and Bolsheviks as inseparable enemies, noting that anti-Jewish violence predated the Holocaust, while another reconstructs the initial invasion period, showing that local populations often viewed Jews as the embodiment of the regime, regardless of the invaders' identity. The findings challenge modern historical narratives, noting how both the Soviet Union and Western powers have historically emphasized different aspects of the conflict—Soviet sacrifice versus the Holocaust—and how contemporary institutions treat Nazism and communism as equally abhorrent. This suggests that historical memory remains a highly contested field, influencing current geopolitical narratives and diplomatic relations.
-
28.
The article argues that Russian defense policymaking operates within an "imperfect equilibrium" between presidential authority and military leadership, characterized by cycles of reform and centralization. Key evidence traces Putin's efforts to control the armed forces, from the sweeping reforms of Anatoly Serdyukov to the subsequent rearmament under Sergei Shoigu. However, the military's structural flaws became critically evident during the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Consequently, effective military improvement requires deeper presidential involvement in decision-making and the significant militarization of the national economy.
-
29.The World’s Worst Bet: How the Globalization Gamble Went Wrong (and What Would Make It Right) (Foreign Affairs)
The article argues that the foundational premises of modern economic globalization—namely, that open markets benefit all and that integrating China guarantees political liberalization—have failed. Key evidence includes the 'China shock,' which deindustrialized large parts of the American heartland, and the fact that Chinese leadership successfully resisted political liberalization despite global economic pressures. For policymakers, the implication is that understanding these systemic failures is a necessary prerequisite for any future strategy aimed at reforming or saving the global economic system.
-
30.
The article argues that rapid population aging presents a critical threat to global prosperity and social cohesion by straining public finances. This demographic shift increases the costs of healthcare, pensions, and eldercare, which are funded by a shrinking working-age tax base. To mitigate this fiscal crisis, policymakers must implement multi-pronged strategies, including boosting fertility rates through better social support and raising the retirement age. The text also highlights immigration as a potential solution, though cautioning that such policies must navigate potential political instability.
-
31.
The Brady Plan successfully resolved the 1980s Latin American debt crisis by facilitating the exchange of troubled bank loans for newly issued bonds, thereby clearing defaulted debt and restoring access to global finance. This success was driven by a combination of U.S. political pressure and multilateral incentives that jump-started emerging market debt trading. However, the authors caution that this model is no longer viable for today's low-income debt crises. The primary challenges are the highly diverse nature of modern creditors and the fact that the United States has ceded its role as the world's top lender to China.
-
32.Chile’s Struggles for International Status and Domestic Legitimacy: Standing at the Liberal Order’s Edge (Foreign Affairs)
The article argues that Chile's democratic stability and international standing were historically secured by its integration into the U.S.-led liberal international order, which rewarded its commitment to democratic capitalism with favorable trade agreements. This stability, however, is now threatened by Washington's perceived drift away from liberal internationalism, leaving Chile vulnerable. The recent election of a conservative figure like José Antonio Kast is highlighted as a critical stress test for Chilean democracy. Policymakers must recognize that Chile's future depends on navigating this increasingly unpredictable geopolitical environment while maintaining its democratic credentials.
-
33.
The analysis of El Paso reveals that the U.S.-Mexico border region is defined by cyclical resource extraction, historical violence, and complex cross-border movement. Key evidence points to the physical remnants of industrial activity (like copper smelters) alongside a history of two-way migration, which consistently challenges fluctuating U.S. immigration policies. The texts argue that political rhetoric, whether focused on jingoism or enforcement, fails to address the persistent economic and social pull of the American dream. For policy, this suggests that stable, bi-directional cooperation must supersede purely enforcement-based strategies to manage the region's deep-seated economic and social dynamics.
-
34.
The central finding is that African youth are not merely a demographic challenge but a powerful, transformative force actively disrupting established political and cultural norms. Evidence points to youth-led activism and protests in nations like Uganda, which challenge the longevity of autocratic regimes. The analysis implies that Western policy must critically reassess its support for aging, repressive leaders, shifting focus instead toward enabling democratic reforms and empowering the burgeoning youth opposition.
-
35.
The article argues that China has shifted away from a period of 'partial reform equilibrium' toward a new form of neo-totalitarianism. This shift was catalyzed by Xi Jinping, who responded to economic slowdown and legitimacy challenges by reactivating foundational totalitarian institutions, such as state dominance, information control, and systematic repression. This internal pivot is coupled with a bolder foreign policy aimed at exploiting perceived U.S. weakness, signaling a return to a Cold War dynamic. Policy analysts should anticipate that this trajectory will delay the emergence of a politically liberal China for at least another generation, necessitating strategic adjustments to engagement models.
-
36.
The article argues that taxation is not an inherent threat to democracy but a foundational necessity, providing the legitimacy and resources required for representative government. It posits that historically, anti-tax sentiment has consistently originated from wealthy elites, while authoritarian regimes tend to impose lower taxes, suggesting taxes are integral to the democratic social contract. Consequently, adopting an extreme anti-tax posture is not merely a fiscal disagreement but fundamentally constitutes an opposition to the democratic structure and legitimacy of the government itself.
-
37.
The article argues that large, dominant political structures, or "Goliaths," historically sow the seeds of their own decline, citing examples from the Roman Empire to modern global powers. The key evidence points to systemic vulnerabilities, including territorial overreach, extreme wealth inequality, environmental degradation, resource scarcity, and institutional corruption. The author posits that the contemporary Goliath is not a single nation but a globalized capitalist civilization facing unprecedented stress from climate change, pandemics, and a fragmenting global system. Policy implications suggest that mitigating these systemic risks—rather than focusing solely on geopolitical competition—is crucial for preventing a major societal collapse.
-
38.
The analysis argues that Putin's authoritarian regime faces a unique vulnerability: the excessive zeal of its own loyalists. These officials, desperate to demonstrate loyalty, often misinterpret the Kremlin's ambiguous intentions, leading them to make statements or take actions that inadvertently undermine the regime's interests. The regime is trapped in a cycle where it cannot punish sycophancy without risking a loss of perceived loyalty, creating internal instability. Policymakers should recognize that this internal contradiction makes Russian behavior unpredictable and suggests that the regime's stability is contingent on managing this volatile internal dynamic.
-
39.The Elements of Power: A Story of War, Technology, and the Dirtiest Supply Chain on Earth (Foreign Affairs)
The green energy transition, while necessary for global climate goals, relies heavily on critical minerals like cobalt and lithium extracted from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The article argues that this global shift, driven by technological demand, disproportionately burdens the Congolese people, who bear the human and environmental costs of resource extraction. Geopolitically, the race for these materials creates a complex, often exploitative, supply chain involving global powers, manufacturers, and local miners. Policymakers must address the inherent inequity of the transition, ensuring that the benefits and costs of developing clean energy are shared justly and ethically.
-
40.
The development of precision-guided munitions, exemplified by the Paveway bomb, fundamentally altered modern warfare by enabling forces to strike targets previously deemed unreachable. This technological leap significantly reduced the risk of both American military and civilian casualties during combat operations. The key finding is that this reduction in perceived risk lowers the political threshold for intervention, making it easier for policymakers to launch military operations in complex theaters like Iraq, Kosovo, and Libya. Consequently, the availability of highly accurate weaponry acts as a strategic enabler for military interventionism.
-
41.
The article argues that global population aging and shrinking working-age populations will fundamentally constrain the capacity of major states to wage war, leading to a potential 'geriatric peace.' This theory is supported by demographic trends, such as China's projected dramatic decline in its working-age population, which limits both resources and manpower for conflict. While acknowledging that demographic factors are not deterministic—citing Russia's invasion of Ukraine as a counterexample—the analysis suggests that these limitations will dampen the pressures for large-scale great power conflict, particularly between the US and China. Policymakers should factor demographic decline into long-term strategic planning, recognizing it as a structural brake on military escalation.
-
42.The Hour of the Predator: Encounters With the Autocrats and Tech Billionaires Taking Over the World (Foreign Affairs)
The article argues that the established Western-led international order is collapsing, replaced by a new global power elite composed of ruthless autocrats and tech billionaires. This shift is characterized by a disregard for international law and democratic norms, exemplified by the dangerous combination of authoritarianism and artificial intelligence. The piece warns that the traditional diplomatic and legal frameworks are insufficient to counter these powerful, self-serving 'predators.' Policy must prepare for a future marked by chaos and the absence of reliable global rules.
-
43.
The core argument of this piece is that international relations are inherently anarchic and dangerous, making power the ultimate currency for state survival. Realism posits that because global cooperation is unreliable, states must prioritize the pursuit of national interests above idealistic moral considerations. Key reasoning emphasizes that stability is best achieved not through universal ideals, but through the pragmatic, artful management of state power and self-interest. Policymakers should therefore adopt a realist framework, focusing on robust statecraft and power projection to navigate a volatile world where trust is scarce.
-
44.
The article argues that European leaders have historically failed to adequately deter authoritarian threats, citing both the failures in the Balkans and the appeasement of Hitler's regime. Specifically, the author critiques contemporary European leaders (including those in Austria, Germany, and Hungary) for appeasing modern authoritarians, such as Russia's Vladimir Putin. This appeasement is characterized not merely as naiveté, but often as an opportunistic pursuit of material gain. The implication is that this pattern of willful disregard for authoritarian dangers poses a significant strategic risk to European stability and democratic integrity.
-
45.
Contrary to narratives of rising authoritarianism, protest movements in Latin America are driving democratic deepening, not undermining it. The analysis shows that economic liberalization, while weakening traditional labor, has energized a diverse spectrum of civil society groups, leading to protests that are either 'reactive' against austerity or 'proactive' in demanding rights and liberties. Protesters have adapted their methods from strikes to artistic demonstrations, and critically, local elites now tend to perceive these popular movements as ordinary democratic expressions. Policymakers should therefore recognize the evolving role of civil society and engage with these diverse groups rather than treating protests solely as signs of instability.
-
46.
The article argues that global liberal democracy is undergoing a significant decline, challenging post-Cold War assumptions about its permanence. Key evidence points to the consolidation of power by autocracies (e.g., China, Russia), the slide of established democracies into illiberalism (e.g., Hungary, Turkey), and the rise of coups in regions like Africa. Furthermore, the rule of law is weakening even in historically stable democracies, suggesting a global trend toward authoritarianism. Policy implications suggest that international strategy must urgently reassess the resilience of democratic institutions and develop proactive measures to counter the global spread of illiberal governance.
-
47.
The analysis argues that the future trajectory of global order—whether it trends toward cooperation, fragmentation, or domination—will be determined by the actions of the Global South. It critiques Western powers for failing to engage in genuine dialogue, instead adopting a unilateral 'monologue' approach that is alienating the developing world. For the West to maintain influence, the publication stresses that it must urgently shift its strategy from imposing narratives to actively listening to and incorporating the needs and perspectives of the Global South. Failure to adapt this diplomatic approach risks undermining Western leadership and stability in the coming geopolitical era.
-
48.
The article argues that the traditional 'India Model' of sustained growth and stability is facing significant structural stress. Evidence, such as the massive crowds competing for low-level government posts in Odisha, highlights deep systemic issues regarding job scarcity and the reliance on state employment for social prestige and financial security. This intense competition suggests that the economy is failing to generate sufficient high-quality jobs for its massive youth population. Policymakers must therefore anticipate potential social instability and shifts in labor dynamics that could challenge India's long-term development trajectory.
-
49.The Rise of the Russian Hawks: Ideology and Politics From the Late Soviet Union to Putin’s Russia (Foreign Affairs)
The research traces the rise of 'modernist conservatism'—an anti-Western ideology encompassing Orthodox monarchists and Eurasianists—from informal intellectual circles in the late Soviet era to its current influence on the Putin regime. Key evidence shows that these groups advocate for a self-reliant Russian model based on technological and military might to assert civilizational distinction from the West. While the Kremlin has increasingly adopted this thinking, the leadership now relies on external think tanks rather than formal state institutions for ideological production. This suggests that Russia's strategic direction is driven by decentralized, yet potent, ideological currents, complicating policy responses and signaling a persistent, non-state source of geopolitical pressure.
-
50.
The analysis argues that the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states are not monolithic, challenging the common perception of them as indistinguishable absolute monarchies. It provides a detailed, comparative look at the diverse internal dynamics, examining everything from parliamentary politics (Kuwait) and sovereign wealth fund ambitions (Saudi Arabia) to varying approaches to popular representation and opposition. This deep dive reveals significant variation in the resources, strategies, and governance models employed by these powerful ruling families. Policymakers must therefore avoid generalizing about the region, instead tailoring their strategies to account for the unique political and institutional dynamics of each individual Gulf state.
-
51.
The analysis debunks persistent myths surrounding Christopher Columbus, arguing that he was primarily a product of his late-medieval era, motivated by wealth and status. While debunking specific rumors, the work confirms Columbus's role as the first European to establish lasting transatlantic routes, while also condemning his brutal treatment and enslavement of indigenous populations. For policy, the findings underscore the necessity of moving beyond simplistic 'Great Man' narratives when analyzing historical events. This historical nuance is critical for accurately assessing modern geopolitical relationships and understanding the enduring legacy of colonial exploitation in the Americas.
-
52.
The article critiques the widely accepted narrative that the world has transitioned into a 'multipolar' era, arguing that this consensus is often treated as a self-evident fact rather than a proposition requiring scrutiny. It notes that major global powers, including the US, China, and Russia, are all adopting this language to signal the end of American unipolar dominance. For policy strategists, the implication is that the concept of multipolarity should be approached with skepticism, as the true global power structure may be far more complex or less fragmented than the prevailing narrative suggests.
-
53.
The analysis argues that Hindutva, India's Hindu nationalism, constitutes an indigenous fascist ideology, distinct from European models. Key evidence shows that while its goal is forced assimilation into a homogenized Hindu community rather than mass extermination, it utilizes the caste system as a functional tool of hierarchy and purity, paralleling Nazi racial theories. Policymakers must recognize that this ideology is fundamentally reshaping India's social and political landscape by reframing Hinduism from an ethnicity to a religion. This suggests that external strategic engagement must account for the unique, caste-based mechanisms of Indian nationalism, rather than applying standard Western definitions of fascism.
-
54.
The article argues that China's rise demonstrates that authoritarian regimes can achieve technological dynamism and sustained growth through a model termed "smart authoritarianism." This success is attributed not to high GDP per capita, but to robust economic capacity, including strong human capital, infrastructure, and state-directed industrial policy. By selectively relaxing political control to foster innovation, China has become a genuine global competitor to the United States. Policymakers must recognize that this state-guided development model presents a powerful and attractive alternative to traditional Western economic structures.
-
55.Strange Stability: How Cold War Scientists Set Out to Control the Arms Race and Ended Up Serving the Military-Industrial Complex (Foreign Affairs)
The analysis examines how Cold War scientists reframed nuclear policy, arguing that the goal was not disarmament, but rather stabilizing the arms race through controlled deterrence. While these thinkers provided valuable intellectual frameworks for policymakers, their actual influence on nuclear decision-making was less pronounced than commonly believed. The core finding is that the concept of 'stability' allowed analysts to organize thought, even if they were skeptical of total disarmament. For policy, this suggests that understanding the political dynamics that sideline scientific input is crucial for developing modern arms control strategies and managing great power competition.
-
56.
The publication argues that effective counter-terrorism efforts rely less on military action and more on robust legal processes to secure convictions. Using the case of an al-Qaeda agent, the analysis demonstrates that civilian criminal courts are significantly more effective than military commissions in prosecuting terrorists, despite the lengthy demands of due process. The key finding is that securing justice requires meticulous evidence gathering and adherence to established legal frameworks, rather than relying solely on battlefield capture. Policymakers should therefore prioritize the development of international legal cooperation and judicial mechanisms to ensure accountability for terrorist actors.
-
57.
The article posits that the international system is at a crossroads, facing a choice between a multipolar world of competing spheres of influence (Yalta logic) or an open, cooperative multilateral order (Helsinki logic). This contest is defined by three major coalitions: the 'Global West' (US, Europe, Japan), the 'Global East' (China, Russia), and the pivotal 'Global South.' The Global South is identified as the decisive factor in determining the future global order. Policymakers are advised that the West must adopt a strategy of 'pragmatic realism,' engaging with both the East and the South to rebuild a rules-based global system centered on the UN.
-
58.
The article argues that international development assistance suffers from 'ahistoricism,' meaning practitioners frequently design and assess programs without adequately considering historical context or local circumstances. This neglect stems from bureaucratic pressures, managerial routines, and abstract theoretical models that overlook specific national particularities. To improve efficacy, the author calls for a fundamental shift that reintroduces historical study and comparative experience into the theory and practice of aid. Policy implications suggest that foreign aid strategies must move beyond standardized models, integrating deep historical research to ensure programs are locally relevant and resilient against political challenges.
-
59.
The article presents a scathing critique of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, arguing that the pursuit of a U.S.-centric order since the Cold War has resulted in regional ruination. Key evidence points to the failure to resolve the core Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which allowed the U.S. to justify prolonged involvement through failed 'peace processes.' This neglect led to disastrous policies, including interventions in Iraq and Syria, and support for actions like the Gaza assault, all of which ignored regional public opinion and undermined democracy promotion. Policymakers must fundamentally reassess their strategy, moving away from unilateral imposition of order and recognizing the need for genuine regional stability.
-
60.
The article posits that in the current era of great-power competition, diplomacy must be understood not merely as communication, but as a sophisticated exercise in grand strategy. Historically, successful statecraft—as demonstrated by figures from Bismarck to the Byzantines—requires leaders to build complex alliances and coalitions to offset limited national capabilities. This strategic process involves restricting the operational space of adversaries while integrating diplomatic goals with both military and economic power. Consequently, the analysis stresses that mastering this comprehensive art of statecraft is increasingly vital for managing threats and maintaining stability in a fractured global order.
-
61.
The article critiques the long-standing U.S. strategic commitment, known as the 'pivot to Asia,' arguing that the initial premise—that rebalancing resources was the sole way to prevent Chinese dominance—has failed. It traces the bipartisan assumption since 2011 that the U.S. must focus on the Asia-Pacific to counter Beijing's rise. The piece implies that the current strategic framework is insufficient, suggesting that the U.S. must fundamentally reassess its approach to the region. Policy implications suggest a need to move beyond the original 'pivot' narrative to craft a more adaptable and effective long-term strategy.
-
62.
The publication argues that U.S. failure to disarm North Korea stems not from external threats, but from chronic internal policy failures, bureaucratic paralysis, and missed opportunities across successive administrations since the 1990s. Key evidence includes critiques of the Obama administration's 'paralysis cloaked in patience,' the internal conflicts during the Bush era, and the disruptive actions of certain advisors. The core finding is that flawed policy execution and institutional stove-piping have consistently undermined effective U.S. strategy toward Pyongyang, necessitating a fundamental overhaul of diplomatic and policy processes.
-
63.
The analysis argues that India's historical failure to become a major electronics manufacturing power, despite early successes like the TIFRAC project, was not a scientific deficiency but a structural policy failure. Key evidence points to the state's tendency to support single, flagship projects rather than cultivating a comprehensive industrial ecosystem. This resulted in a weak domestic manufacturing base, forcing reliance on imported components despite advanced scientific talent. The implication for policy is that India's current push for technological self-reliance is likely to face similar hurdles, requiring a shift from project-based support to robust industrial policy development.
-
64.
The article identifies a fundamental shift in global governance, framing the current international environment as a clash between two operating systems. The first advocates for solving global issues through supranational institutions and multilateral rules, while the opposing view insists that the nation-state remains the sole foundation of legitimate authority and effective action. This suggests that the post-Cold War era's reliance on a 'global first' approach is giving way to a renewed emphasis on state sovereignty. Policymakers must therefore navigate the tension between necessary global cooperation and the inherent limitations and accountability of individual national governments.
-
65.
The compiled Kissinger tapes offer unprecedented, minute-by-minute insight into U.S. foreign policy decision-making during a pivotal era (1969-1977). While the transcripts confirm Kissinger's strategic brilliance during major crises, they also reveal his highly manipulative and often 'brutal' methods of achieving policy goals. This material provides invaluable historical context, detailing the internal dynamics and high-stakes decision-making processes of American diplomacy. Policymakers can use these accounts to better understand the evolution of U.S. statecraft and the personal costs associated with global power.
-
66.
The article argues that the militarization of domestic law enforcement poses significant perils to civil liberties and effective governance. Using the hypothetical deployment of the National Guard in D.C. as a case study, the piece critiques the tendency to treat routine public safety issues as 'crime emergencies' requiring military intervention. The core reasoning is that such overreach erodes trust between communities and law enforcement, often escalating tensions rather than solving crime. Policy implications suggest that federal and local authorities must strictly adhere to civilian policing models and restrict the use of military forces to maintain democratic stability and public order.
-
67.
China has successfully transitioned from a net energy importer to the world's dominant market maker in clean energy technologies. Key evidence includes its global leadership in manufacturing wind turbines, solar panels, controlling battery supply chains, and exporting competitive electric vehicles. This rapid ascent fundamentally shifts global energy power dynamics, making China a critical strategic player whose dominance requires careful policy and economic countermeasures from Western nations.
-
68.
The publication argues that while the transatlantic alliance faces deep rifts due to US political volatility, the commitment to the partnership remains strong. Allies must adapt by adopting a strategy of assertive self-reliance, recognizing that they can no longer solely depend on the United States for security. This requires enhancing mutual burden-sharing and maintaining robust trade ties while simultaneously holding firm on national interests. The path forward demands a strategic shift from passive appeasement to a proactive, mutually beneficial partnership that asserts the sovereignty of all involved parties.
-
69.
Beijing is pivoting from volatile regulatory crackdowns to a managed model of private sector oversight, acknowledging that private enterprise is crucial for achieving technological self-reliance. This new framework involves codifying laws (like the Private Economy Promotion Law) and utilizing mechanisms such as 'golden shares' and party cells to ensure that private growth aligns with the CCP's strategic national goals. While this approach provides much-needed stability for 'tough tech' sectors, it requires firms to prioritize political directives over pure market logic. Consequently, while boosting domestic capacity, this managed openness risks dampening corporate dynamism and limiting the global collaboration essential for advanced fields like biotechnology.
-
70.
The conflict in Ukraine has settled into a prolonged pattern of attrition and positional fighting, with neither side achieving a decisive breakthrough. While Russia retains tactical advantages, the analysis suggests that time is working against Moscow due to increasing manpower strain and operational failures, preventing the attainment of key objectives like fully securing Donetsk. Strategically, the fighting itself informs the relative leverage of both parties, meaning that external diplomatic pressure to impose a cease-fire is unlikely to succeed. Policymakers must recognize that the war is not nearing a quick end and that sustained, long-term support is required to manage a protracted conflict.
-
71.Export Controls on Artificial Intelligence and Uncrewed Aircraft Systems: Interagency Challenges (RAND)
This RAND report argues that current U.S. export controls for AI and uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) are lagging behind rapid technological advancements and require a more agile, data-centric interagency approach. The study finds that the U.S. no longer maintains a technological monopoly, meaning overly restrictive controls risk hollowing out the domestic industrial base and driving global partners toward Chinese alternatives. Consequently, the authors recommend shifting regulatory focus toward specialized military training data rather than ubiquitous hardware, while calling for increased funding and technical expertise for the Bureau of Industry and Security.
-
72.Managing Systemic Supply Chain Risk to the U.S. Economy from Trade Concentration and Geopolitical Conflict: The Roles of Insurance and Other Hedging Strategies (RAND)
This RAND report argues that systemic supply chain risks from geopolitical conflict are significant and underappreciated, particularly in sectors like nonferrous metals and electrical components sourced from countries such as Brazil and India. The authors find that private insurance is ill-suited for managing these correlated, large-scale risks, while government interventions often lack necessary market-sensing mechanisms to prevent unsustainable private practices. To enhance resilience, the report recommends that the U.S. government track conflict-dependency overlaps and that industries adopt 'Til Needed' hedging options—private contracts for surge capacity—to bridge the gap between market incentives and national economic security.
-
73.
The Supreme Court's decision to invalidate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) for tariff imposition has removed the U.S. executive branch's primary tool for rapidly deploying broad country-level duties. This ruling forces the administration to seek alternative statutory authorities to advance its trade strategy, potentially slowing the pace of tariff implementation. The resulting policy shift carries significant implications for business costs, supply chains, and federal revenues, while challenging the long-term stability of the international trading system. Consequently, the legal clarification of presidential emergency powers necessitates a fundamental reassessment of how U.S. economic statecraft will be conducted in the future.
-
74.
President Claudia Sheinbaum is aggressively dismantling networks of collusion between politicians and organized crime to consolidate her executive authority and stabilize U.S.-Mexico relations. This strategy is evidenced by 'Operation Swarm,' which has achieved unusually high conviction rates for corrupt municipal officials, and the strategic replacement of senior federal figures tied to her predecessor. Success could significantly strengthen the rule of law and reduce cartel influence, though the administration faces risks of internal political fracturing and the historical tendency for corruption to re-infiltrate reformed institutions.
-
75.Reduced immigration slowed population growth for the nation and most states, new census data show (Brookings)
New Census Bureau data shows that U.S. population growth slowed to 0.52% in 2024-25, a drop primarily attributed to a 50% decline in net international migration. While immigration fell to 1.3 million people, it still accounted for 71% of total national growth as natural increase remains historically low. Nearly every state experienced slower growth or population losses, including major hubs like California, which flipped to a decline as immigration could no longer offset domestic out-migration. These findings imply that further immigration cuts will likely result in widespread population contraction and significant long-term challenges for labor force productivity.
-
76.
The Brookings report argues that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) threatens the U.S. care economy by severely restricting the immigrant labor force that sustains it. By increasing deportation funding, raising work permit fees, and stripping Medicaid and SNAP eligibility from many noncitizens, the law creates significant labor shortages in nursing homes and childcare centers. These disruptions are projected to lead to worsened health outcomes for vulnerable populations and higher costs for the broader healthcare system. To mitigate these risks, the report recommends state-level implementations of a Domestic Worker Bill of Rights to safeguard essential caregivers regardless of their immigration status.
-
77.
Brookings argues that ICE’s rapid expansion and weakened hiring and training standards have led to a surge in excessive force incidents, including the deaths of U.S. citizens. The report highlights that training durations have been cut by over 60% while 'absolute immunity' claims increasingly shield agents from accountability for constitutional violations. To mitigate these risks, the authors recommend implementing mandatory de-escalation training, cross-checking misconduct files, and requiring body-worn cameras. These reforms are presented as critical steps to restore institutional legitimacy and protect civil rights during domestic enforcement operations.
-
78.
The article argues that current U.S. immigration policies focused solely on deterrence are causing significant economic damage, including negative net migration and a $50 billion reduction in consumer spending. It highlights how aggressive enforcement and the closure of legal pathways have resulted in severe labor shortages across agriculture, engineering, and healthcare sectors. Brookings suggests that a balanced approach—combining credible enforcement with expanded lawful pathways and regional diplomacy—is necessary to manage migration sustainably. The analysis concludes that 2026 requires a shift toward modernizing the visa system and reforming asylum processes to ensure long-term economic stability and border order.
-
79.Redrawing global boundaries? The United States, China, and the viability of spheres of influence in the 21 st century (Brookings)
Brookings’ expert roundtable argues that a U.S. "Donroe Doctrine" push for hemispheric primacy is more likely to weaken than strengthen Washington’s position in long-term competition with China, though one contributor contends it could restore deterrence by denying Beijing footholds near U.S. borders. The dominant reasoning is that coercive regional tactics and unilateral moves drain U.S. military bandwidth from the Indo-Pacific, damage alliances, and erode soft power while giving China narrative and diplomatic advantages. Experts also note China’s already deep regional footprint, including major trade, investment, and infrastructure ties across Latin America, which makes a clean spheres-of-influence rollback unrealistic. Strategically, a formal U.S.-China spheres bargain is assessed as unstable and asymmetric: it could pressure smaller states to hedge, accelerate regional militarization and possible nuclear proliferation, and incentivize revisionist claims elsewhere, suggesting U.S. policy should prioritize alliance credibility, rules-based coordination, and positive economic alternatives over coercion.
-
80.
The article argues that the U.S. must update its narrative on Taiwan, moving away from viewing the island as a 'strategic liability' or a single point of failure for the global economy. It highlights that Taiwan's hardware is the irreplaceable backbone of America's AI ambitions and that conflict with China is not inevitable if a credible military deterrent is maintained. The proposed policy shift emphasizes a middle path: preserving the status quo to allow for an eventual non-coercive resolution while grounding U.S. support in calculated self-interest rather than ideological charity.
-
81.
The report argues that European nations must strengthen sanctions against Russia’s 'shadow fleet' of oil tankers by mandating adequate insurance coverage through stricter regulation of flag states. This strategy aims to force vessels back into Western-regulated services, ensuring compliance with price caps and mitigating the risk of uninsured environmental disasters. Economic modeling indicates that aggressive enforcement, including insurance disclosure and flag state liability, could reduce Russian Baltic oil tax revenues by up to 14% while shifting the majority of trade to compliant vessels. To implement this, the UK and EU should coordinate on universal maritime standards and exert diplomatic and economic pressure on 'flags of convenience' to eliminate loopholes used for sanctions evasion.
-
82.
Brookings has released an updated interactive tool, "Tracking the labor market and jobs," designed to provide detailed monthly monitoring of the U.S. workforce through various demographic lenses. The tool utilizes Current Population Survey microdata to offer granular insights into labor force participation, employment-population ratios, and nuanced unemployment metrics like the U-5 rate. By allowing cross-tabulation of factors such as nativity, education, and parental status, it highlights specific disparities and trends that headline economic figures often obscure. This capability is essential for policymakers to design evidence-based interventions that address the unique challenges faced by different segments of the labor market.
-
83.
The 'America First' tariffs of 2025-2026 have not triggered an immediate recession, largely due to the U.S. economy's resilience and the relatively small role of traded goods in its overall GDP. However, the policy marks a definitive end to the post-WWII rules-based trade order, as tariffs are increasingly used as tools for foreign policy leverage and economic statecraft rather than mere industry protection. While businesses have adapted in the short term, experts warn of long-term consequences including persistent inflationary pressure and reduced economic competition. Ultimately, the shift necessitates a new national consensus to balance the benefits of open trade against the strategic risks of dependency on geopolitical adversaries.
-
84.
The article examines why the U.S. economy remains resilient despite significant policy shocks from President Trump’s second-term agenda, including high tariffs, sharp immigration cuts, and attacks on Federal Reserve independence. It identifies four potential explanations: the shocks may be overestimated in scale, offsetting stimuli like the AI boom are providing support, traditional economic models may understate the economy's inherent diversity, or the full negative impacts are simply delayed. However, metrics such as rising unemployment and risk premia suggest a gradual deterioration, implying that long-term stability is not guaranteed if these pressures persist.
-
85.Even in ‘business-friendly’ states, federal policy shocks are hurting Latino-owned firms (Brookings)
Federal policy volatility—including intensified immigration enforcement, tariff uncertainty, and the retrenchment of public contracting—is disproportionately destabilizing Latino-owned businesses in traditionally "business-friendly" states like Texas, Florida, and North Carolina. These firms serve as economic bellwethers because they are concentrated in labor-intensive sectors like construction and services, where policy shocks transmit fastest and financial buffers are thinnest. The report warns that this environment creates a "K-shaped" business landscape where small, place-based firms face quiet attrition while larger, insulated corporations consolidate. Consequently, long-term economic competitiveness in these high-growth regions will depend more on ensuring predictable policy stability than on traditional tax-incentive models.
-
86.
The Foresight Africa 2026 report argues that while the continent faces a contraction in foreign aid and a rapidly expanding labor force, it can achieve resilient growth by prioritizing internal resource mobilization and human capital development. Key strategies include leveraging natural resource wealth for financing, accelerating industry-led growth through mineral beneficiation, and operationalizing the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). Policy efforts must focus on creating quality jobs for a population projected to double by 2050 to prevent fragility and ensure long-term stability. Consequently, African and global stakeholders are encouraged to coordinate on structural reforms and asserted geopolitical interests to transform current economic pressures into sustainable development opportunities.
-
87.
Africa’s creative economy is emerging as a high-growth frontier for global investment, with the sector projected to reach a value of $200 billion by 2030. Driven by the world’s youngest workforce and rapid digital adoption, industries like music, gaming, and film are attracting significant international capital despite persistent challenges in infrastructure and intellectual property protection. Success in this market requires strategies focused on mobile-first accessibility, infrastructure development, and leveraging the diaspora’s purchasing power. Consequently, addressing structural barriers and formalizing creative enterprises is essential for transforming Africa’s cultural output into a sustainable driver of inclusive economic growth.
-
88.
Africa's working-age population is projected to reach 2.5 billion by 2050, presenting a critical opportunity to harness a demographic dividend through strategic investment in its 830 million youth. Despite gains in school enrollment, high rates of learning poverty and a lack of STEM competencies threaten to leave a generation ill-equipped for the 21st-century labor market. To ensure prosperity, policymakers must prioritize early childhood health, improve foundational education quality, and foster a dynamic economic environment supported by stable governance. Successful transformation depends on matching individual competencies with state systems that can generate high-quality jobs and resist external shocks.
-
89.
China's expansion of zero-tariff access for African nations is unlikely to rebalance trade on its own, as the continent's exports remain heavily concentrated in low-value raw materials and minerals. Despite initiatives to boost agricultural trade, China maintains a persistent $60 billion trade surplus with Africa, highlighting deep-seated structural imbalances. To achieve long-term growth, Africa must leverage this policy to attract foreign direct investment and drive industrialization, positioning itself as a strategic, low-tariff production hub for the Chinese market.
-
90.When medicines are controlled: How Drug Enforcement Administration rules exacerbate drug shortages (Brookings)
This Brookings event discusses how the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) regulatory framework, particularly its quota system for Schedule II medicines, exacerbates persistent drug shortages in the United States. While these production limits aim to prevent the diversion of medications like opioids and ADHD treatments for illicit use, they often fail to account for manufacturing realities, leading to delays and rationing in patient care. The panel explores the intersection of federal regulation and supply chain stability, suggesting that reforms are necessary to balance public safety with the reliable availability of essential medicines.
-
91.
Brookings reports that U.S. net migration turned negative in 2025 for the first time in over fifty years due to restrictive administration policies, with the trend expected to persist through 2026. This reversal is driven by sharp declines in visa and refugee inflows coupled with increased interior enforcement and voluntary departures. Economically, this shift has slashed 'breakeven' employment growth to near-zero levels, dampened GDP, and is projected to reduce consumer spending by up to $110 billion. Consequently, policymakers should prioritize the unemployment rate over raw job growth figures to accurately assess labor market health and adjust monetary policy.
-
92.
The India AI Impact Summit represents a strategic shift in global AI governance from theoretical safety concerns toward practical deployment, impact, and inclusivity for the Global South. By focusing on "People, Planet, and Progress," the summit aims to move beyond high-level principles to address the "implementation gap" through operational standards and sovereign AI initiatives that reduce technological dependency. Experts argue that long-term success requires establishing durable cross-border accountability frameworks and ensuring emerging economies play a sustained role in technical standard-setting.
-
93.
The article argues that the traditional model of data center development—characterized by short-term construction jobs and high resource consumption—must be replaced by a 'mutualistic' approach that leverages AI infrastructure for long-term regional prosperity. It highlights that the current AI scale-up has granted local governments new leverage to negotiate for high-value benefits, such as university R&D partnerships, compute access, and shared equity endowments, rather than settling for modest tax revenues. Policymakers are encouraged to move beyond 'race-to-the-bottom' incentive competitions and instead integrate data centers into broader tech ecosystems that drive energy innovation and local talent development. Ultimately, the report suggests that transforming isolated data centers into community-supported AI hubs is necessary to ensure the industry's growth delivers on its promise of widespread economic reindustrialization.
-
94.
This collection of essays argues that the United States and China must coordinate to mitigate the 'malicious uplift' of non-state actors using advanced AI for cyberattacks, biological weapons, and disinformation. The authors highlight that AI's low cost and high accessibility create systemic risks that traditional arms control cannot easily manage, necessitating shared safety guidelines and crisis communication channels. Ultimately, bilateral cooperation is viewed as a necessary catalyst for a global multilateral non-proliferation framework to prevent 'safety arbitrage' by malicious groups.
-
95.
A yearlong global study by the Brookings Institution finds that the current risks of generative AI in children's education, such as undermining foundational learning and social-emotional well-being, outweigh its potential benefits. Based on consultations with over 500 stakeholders and a review of 400 studies, the report warns that overreliance on AI tools can diminish students' fundamental learning capacity and trusting relationships. To address these challenges, the authors propose a 'Prosper, Prepare, and Protect' framework that advocates for pedagogically sound AI deployment, enhanced AI literacy, and robust regulatory frameworks. Policy recommendations emphasize the need for human-centered design, educator involvement in tool creation, and strict privacy protections to ensure AI enriches rather than hinders development.
-
96.
The Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program serves as a vital federal initiative to address acute staffing challenges and quality concerns within the K-12 STEM teacher pipeline. Recent research highlights how this program aims to improve the quantity and quality of STEM instructors, particularly in high-need school districts where demand is highest. Strengthening the teacher pipeline through such targeted programs is essential for ensuring students have access to the robust STEM instruction required for national workforce readiness.
-
97.
The article argues that the Trump administration is sprinting toward a military conflict with Iran without a clear casus belli or exit strategy, risking a repeat of past Middle East intervention failures. It highlights how justifications have shifted from nuclear concerns to ballistic missiles and internal protests, often driven by Israeli pressure and policy inertia rather than imminent threats to the United States. The author contends that since Iran's ability to harm American interests is minimal, pursuing an unprovoked war would serve foreign interests over domestic ones and likely lead to an open-ended regional crisis.
-
98.
The Supreme Court's decision to strike down reciprocal tariffs under the IEEPA highlights that these measures failed to meet administration revenue projections while significantly depressing economic growth and other tax revenues. Evidence shows that 2025 tariff collections fell nearly 50% short of projected targets and functioned as a substantial tax increase that largely offset the benefits of the 2025 tax reforms for most American households. The ruling underscores that tariffs are an insufficient solution for the U.S.'s structural deficit, which is primarily driven by entitlement spending rather than revenue shortfalls. Consequently, the removal of these tariffs is expected to improve the net impact of recent tax cuts, although the administration may still pursue alternative legal routes to impose similar trade barriers.
-
99.
The CATO Institute critiques the Trump administration's Maritime Action Plan (MAP), arguing that its attempt to revive commercial shipbuilding through subsidies and protectionist mandates is economically unrealistic and potentially detrimental to national security. Key obstacles include US shipbuilding costs being five times the global average, severe labor shortages, and antiquated infrastructure that cannot be easily fixed by government intervention. The report warns that siphoning skilled workers into subsidized commercial projects may worsen existing delays in naval shipbuilding rather than providing spillover benefits. Instead of isolationist industrial policy, the author recommends leveraging allied shipyards for non-combatant vessels, providing steady demand signals, and reforming the Jones Act to modernize the US merchant fleet.
-
100.
This report argues that politically motivated terrorism remains a minuscule and overstated threat to Americans, accounting for only 0.35% of all murders between 1975 and 2025. Drawing on 51 years of data, the analysis shows that 88% of terrorist fatalities resulted from just two extreme events—9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombing—while the overall frequency of attacks has not significantly increased over time. Consequently, the author concludes that expanding federal domestic counterterrorism efforts or targeting specific political groups is a disproportionate response that threatens civil liberties without a sound empirical basis.
-
101.
CATO criticizes the 2025 tax deductions for tip and overtime income, arguing that these narrow carve-outs undermine tax neutrality and create significant economic distortions. The analysis highlights that these provisions, projected to cost $121 billion over a decade, incentivize the recharacterization of wages and accelerate 'tipflation' by expanding tipping norms into non-traditional industries like home services. To maximize economic growth and fairness, the authors recommend that Congress allow these deductions to expire in 2028 in favor of a broad-based, low-rate tax system that treats all labor income equally.
-
102.
From 1994 to 2023, U.S. immigrants—including both legal and undocumented populations—generated a cumulative fiscal surplus of $14.5 trillion, significantly reducing national budget deficits and lowering the debt-to-GDP ratio. This positive impact stems from immigrants' higher labor force participation rates and higher per capita tax contributions combined with lower consumption of government benefits like Social Security and education compared to the U.S.-born population. The study concludes that immigration has functioned as a critical buffer against a national debt crisis, suggesting that restrictive immigration policies would likely exacerbate fiscal instability rather than resolve it.
-
103.
This article highlights Hilton Horizons Academy as a successful example of the microschool movement, offering a student-centered alternative to the rigid testing and bureaucracy of traditional public schools. By utilizing personalized curricula and hands-on enrichment—such as robotics and gardening—the academy effectively addresses individual student needs that the standard system often overlooks. The school’s growth and the high satisfaction of its staff underscore the importance of school choice initiatives, such as Tennessee’s education savings account program, which make these models accessible to a broader range of families. These findings suggest that diversifying educational options can improve both teacher retention and student achievement by fostering more adaptive learning environments.
-
104.
Severe public defender shortages in states like Oregon highlight the urgent need to rethink drug criminalization to alleviate overburdened legal systems. The article points to the dismissal of 1,400 criminal cases as evidence that overcriminalization drains judicial resources and can inadvertently undermine public safety. It argues that successful models, such as Portugal’s, demonstrate that decriminalization is most effective when paired with robust treatment infrastructure and coordinated social services. Consequently, policymakers should prioritize scarce resources for crimes that cause direct harm while integrating health-based solutions for drug use.
-
105.
The article argues that the Trump administration’s reliance on "limited" military force against Iran is a strategic illusion that risks initiating an open-ended "forever war." It highlights that while airpower and covert actions minimize immediate American casualties, they frequently result in severe second-order effects like regional instability, refugee crises, and radicalization, as seen in past interventions in Libya and Syria. Ultimately, the author suggests that the administration should prioritize a diplomatic agreement with Tehran to avoid the very type of protracted conflict the president pledged to avoid.
-
106.
While the Supreme Court correctly limited the misuse of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) for broad tariffs, the President still holds significant statutory power to disrupt trade. Hidden provisions like Section 122 and Section 338 offer alternative pathways for the administration to impose unilateral tariffs without immediate congressional oversight or established judicial limits. These vulnerabilities suggest that true trade policy stability will only return if Congress reclaims its constitutional authority and establishes stricter procedural safeguards on executive delegations.
-
107.
Sudan is currently enduring the world’s largest internal displacement and hunger crisis, with over twelve million people forced from their homes following more than two years of civil war between the SAF and RSF. The conflict has escalated toward a de facto partition of the country, marked by the RSF's capture of Darfur and widespread reports of ethnically driven genocide. Strategic implications include heightened regional instability as neighboring countries struggle with refugee inflows and external powers continue to fuel the violence through arms and financing. With humanitarian appeals severely underfunded due to international budget cuts, the crisis risks becoming a permanent humanitarian catastrophe of historic proportions.
-
108.
The United States should 'leapfrog' China’s critical mineral dominance by prioritizing disruptive innovation, waste recovery, and recycling instead of attempting to out-mine or out-process China's entrenched capacity. The report argues that traditional mining projects are too slow to mitigate immediate geopolitical risks, whereas breakthroughs in materials science and AI-enabled extraction from industrial waste offer faster, more resilient paths to independence. Key policy recommendations include launching a national innovation strategy, bridging financing gaps for deep-tech startups, and coordinating with G7 allies to secure circular mineral supply chains.
-
109.
Robert D. Blackwill proposes "resolute global leadership" as the most effective American grand strategy to counter a peer-competitor China and navigate the most dangerous international environment since World War II. The report analyzes five alternative strategic schools, concluding that the U.S. must leverage its unique economic, military, and technological advantages while reconciling itself to a world where its dominance is no longer unchallenged. Key policy recommendations include substantially increasing the defense budget, pivoting military assets to the Indo-Pacific, and re-engaging in multilateral trade frameworks like the CPTPP to revitalize the rules-based order. Ultimately, it emphasizes balancing Chinese power through strengthened alliances and 'peace through strength,' while rejecting military force for purely ideological goals.
-
110.
The CFR’s 2026 Preventive Priorities Survey identifies a significant rise in global instability, highlighting five high-likelihood, high-impact contingencies including intensifying conflicts in the Middle East, the Russia-Ukraine war, and potential U.S. military operations in Venezuela. Based on a survey of over 600 experts, the report emphasizes a shift toward interstate conflict and identifies domestic political violence in the U.S. and AI-enabled cyberattacks as critical threats to national security. These findings suggest that the reduction of conflict prevention infrastructure and more coercive diplomatic stances increase the risk of the United States being drawn into costly, unpredicted military interventions.
-
111.
The report argues that the U.S. must transition from a purely protectionist response to China's automotive dominance toward a proactive strategy of global competition in autonomous, connected, and electric (ACE) vehicles. While current tariffs provide temporary breathing room, the author warns that indefinite isolation risks leaving the U.S. as a technological island of obsolete internal combustion engines while ceding international markets to Chinese firms. To maintain competitiveness, the U.S. should provide conditional financial support to domestic manufacturers, coordinate supply-chain diversification with allies, and manage national security risks through data localization rather than total exclusion. This strategy aims to secure the economic and environmental benefits of the automotive revolution while navigating the geopolitical rivalry with China.
-
112.
CFR argues that a future Taiwan conflict will likely be a protracted, regional war involving multiple actors and external triggers, rather than a contained three-way contest. The report warns that China’s military modernization and gray-zone tactics have eroded U.S. deterrent advantages and shortened operational warning times. To address these new risks, the U.S. must shift from isolated planning to deeply integrated, pre-crisis consultative mechanisms with regional allies like Japan and the Philippines.
-
113.
The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that the President lacks the authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) represents a significant legal setback for the Trump administration's trade strategy. While the administration must now halt collections and potentially refund $175 billion, it is already pivoting to alternative, more constrained authorities like Section 122 and Section 301 to maintain its protectionist stance. This landmark decision reinforces constitutional checks and balances on executive power but is unlikely to lower overall trade barriers, as the administration seeks to replicate previous tariff levels through new investigations before the midterm elections.
-
114.
The article argues that although the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s broad IEEPA-based tariffs as unconstitutional, the administration can still sustain much of its trade agenda through other delegated statutes. It explains that Section 122 can quickly reimpose a temporary across-the-board tariff (up to 15% for 150 days), while Sections 232 and 301 provide more durable sectoral or country-specific tariffs with few effective political constraints once in place; Section 338 is another possible but legally untested option. The core reasoning is that no single authority fully replicates IEEPA’s sweep, but together they can recreate tariffs in a legally defensible patchwork, albeit with procedural limits, sunset risks, and likely litigation. Strategically, policymakers should expect continued tariff leverage in negotiations but greater legal and political friction, including pressure for congressional guardrails and higher concern over consumer and small-business costs.
-
115.
CFR argues that tariffs have become a central driver of U.S. affordability anxiety across party lines, and that cutting them could improve both household costs and public sentiment. A January 2026 CFR-Morning Consult poll of 2,203 adults found major bipartisan majorities linking trade policy to higher prices in groceries, medical care, technology, clothing, housing, transportation, and childcare. The authors pair polling with tariff and price estimates to show tariffs are adding measurable pressure in key categories, while noting overall prices are also shaped by supply shocks, inventories, and firm pricing behavior. The strategic implication is that tariff relief may be one of the fastest politically visible affordability levers before midterms, even if consumer price declines are partial and delayed.
-
116.
CFR argues that Trump’s second-term trade strategy is not a single tariff reset but a rolling, country-by-country restructuring of U.S. trade relations through mostly nonbinding framework deals. The tracker shows that while Liberation Day tariffs set high baselines, subsequent bilateral agreements and exemptions lowered effective rates unevenly and exchanged tariff relief for market-access concessions, purchase pledges, investment commitments, and alignment with U.S. economic-security measures. It also finds these deals are highly flexible and unilateral in design, with weak legal durability, quick-termination provisions, and little congressional constraint, making them closer to instruments of leverage than traditional trade agreements. The policy implication is a less predictable global trade environment where partners must continuously bargain with Washington and balance access to the U.S. market against sovereignty costs and geopolitical exposure, especially vis-a-vis China.
-
117.
CFR’s February 22, 2026, nuclear arms control coverage argues that nonproliferation and arms control remain central to managing great-power rivalry and regional nuclear risks. The evidence is the breadth of its featured analyses and backgrounders—spanning the Iran nuclear deal, sanctions on North Korea, and emerging domains such as outer space—plus contributions from multiple senior experts and task-force work. The overall reasoning is that existing regimes still matter but are under pressure from geopolitical competition, enforcement gaps, and technological change. Policy-wise, the implication is to pair deterrence with renewed diplomacy: strengthen treaty frameworks, tighten coordinated sanctions and verification, and update rules for new strategic domains before instability worsens.
-
118.
This CFR page functions as an AI policy archive rather than a single-claim essay, signaling that artificial intelligence is a sustained strategic priority across Council analysis. The key evidence is the scale and breadth of coverage: 215 entries and contributions from experts spanning security, geopolitics, economics, and technology policy. The underlying reasoning is that AI’s impact is systemic and cross-sector, requiring ongoing multidisciplinary assessment instead of one-off commentary. For policymakers and strategists, the implication is to treat AI as a whole-of-government and international coordination issue, linking innovation policy with risk governance and national competitiveness.
-
119.
CFR’s Energy and Climate Policy coverage frames energy and climate as strategic issues that cut across geopolitics, economics, and security rather than as a narrow environmental silo. The archive format and scale (310 entries) plus a broad mix of contributors indicate sustained, multi-author analysis across regions and policy domains. This structure suggests the core finding is that climate transition, energy security, and technology competition are tightly linked and must be assessed together. The policy implication is that governments should pursue integrated strategies that align decarbonization goals with foreign-policy priorities, industrial competitiveness, and resilience planning.
-
120.
CFR argues that Trump’s State of the Union is primarily a political reset attempt as he faces low approval, difficult midterm dynamics, and skepticism that presidential rhetoric can quickly shift opinion. The article cites weak polling, slowing GDP growth, persistent goods-trade deficits, and a Supreme Court ruling curbing his use of IEEPA tariffs, leaving narrower options such as Section 122. It also flags major foreign-policy pressure points—Iran, Venezuela, China, NATO, Ukraine, and Gaza—where his messaging may signal priorities but not resolve underlying constraints. The key strategic implication is that while the speech can shape partisan narratives, policy outcomes will be driven more by legal limits on executive trade tools, electoral pressures, and high-risk security decisions that may outpace congressional checks.
-
121.
The article argues that the unusually large U.S. military buildup around Iran has put the Middle East on edge because regional governments see a high risk of conflict but still lack clarity on Washington’s objectives. It points to Gulf states’ refusal to join an attack, dual U.S. carrier deployments, and fears of Iranian retaliation through Strait of Hormuz disruption and proxy strikes, while noting Geneva talks produced only vague “guiding principles” rather than a concrete deal. It also highlights the contradiction between launching a Gaza reconstruction-oriented Board of Peace and simultaneously signaling readiness for military escalation against Tehran. The policy implication is that U.S. strategy must align deterrence with explicit end-states, coalition reassurance, and escalation-control mechanisms to avoid a broader regional war that could derail both Gulf economic priorities and Gaza stabilization.
-
122.
CFR’s core finding is that Iran’s system is institutionally complex but functionally centered on the supreme leader’s clerical-security network, which constrains elected officials and limits meaningful reform. The article’s reasoning maps how formal bodies—the presidency, majlis, Guardian Council, Expediency Council, Assembly of Experts, and Supreme National Security Council—are structurally shaped by appointment authority, candidate vetting, and IRGC-linked influence tied to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. It argues that recent shocks, including the June 2025 Israeli strikes and the late-2025/2026 protest wave, exposed regime vulnerabilities, yet the state’s coercive response also demonstrated enduring control by hard-line power centers. The policy implication is that strategy toward Tehran should focus on the supreme leader’s orbit and security institutions, combining calibrated pressure and diplomacy while preparing for episodic instability rather than expecting elected offices alone to drive change.
-
123.
CFR argues that Tehran is pursuing a tactical, tightly constrained negotiating posture: it wants sanctions relief while preserving core red lines, and is offering only limited nuclear flexibility. Evidence includes Iran’s insistence on Oman as venue and a nuclear-only agenda, plus signals it could cap low-level enrichment and dilute some highly enriched uranium under IAEA verification, while Washington still demands zero enrichment. The article also notes the coercive backdrop: expanded U.S. military presence, Israeli warnings that talks could buy Iran time, and the regime’s violent domestic consolidation after mass protest crackdowns. Policy-wise, this suggests the United States and partners should pair diplomacy with credible deterrence, structure any relief around verifiable compliance, and account for residual proxy risks (especially the Houthis) despite broader degradation of Iran’s network.
-
124.
CFR argues that Iran still does not have a nuclear weapon, but it retains the technical base to move quickly toward one and continues to field the Middle East’s most extensive ballistic missile arsenal despite major Israeli and U.S. strikes in 2025. The piece cites IAEA findings of sharply increased near-weapons-grade enrichment, evidence of undeclared nuclear-related activity, and estimates that Iran’s breakout timeline for fissile material could be very short, while missile capabilities include systems with roughly 2,000 km range and demonstrated use in 2024 attacks on Israel. It also notes that military strikes may have delayed but not eliminated Iran’s program, as rebuilding and renewed U.S.-Iran talks in Oman suggest coercion alone has limits. Strategically, the article implies policymakers need a combined approach of verifiable nuclear constraints, missile/proxy limits, calibrated sanctions relief, and credible deterrence to reduce risks of regional war, proliferation, and escalation through miscalculation.
-
125.
The column argues that Trump’s 2026 National Defense Strategy (NDS) is built on prioritization and burden-sharing, but the Iran crisis could expose a gap between that framework and the president’s willingness to intervene aggressively. Froman points to NDS language that shifts U.S. focus toward homeland and hemispheric defense, expects allies in Europe and the Indo-Pacific to assume more conventional responsibilities, and seeks a limited “decent peace” with China rather than outright dominance. He contrasts that restraint with Trump’s military signaling toward Iran, including carrier redeployment and maximal demands, while warning that Iran is far harder to coerce or reshape than Venezuela and could produce prolonged instability after any regime shock. The strategic implication is that U.S. policy must keep Iran actions tightly bounded to avoid a costly quagmire that would undermine NDS prioritization and broader force posture goals.
-
126.
CFR reports that the U.S. goods trade deficit reached a record in 2025, undermining the Trump administration’s claim that emergency tariffs would shrink it and revive domestic manufacturing. Commerce Department data show tariffs redirected sourcing away from China toward countries such as Vietnam and Mexico rather than reducing overall import dependence, while U.S. manufacturing employment fell by about 72,000 jobs after the April 2025 tariff rollout. The brief notes that long-run investment effects from trade deals could still appear, but current evidence points to limited near-term reindustrialization gains. With a Supreme Court ruling pending, the tariffs could be struck down and trigger up to an estimated $175 billion in refunds, highlighting fiscal and strategic risks in a tariff-first policy mix.
-
127.
CFR argues that President Trump’s new Board of Peace is becoming the central U.S.-led mechanism for shaping Gaza’s postwar order, but its viability hinges on Hamas demilitarization and credible governance arrangements. Evidence cited includes broad diplomatic participation (27 formal members and about 45 expected delegations), expected reconstruction pledges of at least $5 billion, and a governance model that currently excludes Palestinian factions in favor of a separate technocratic committee. Conditions on the ground remain unstable, with limited medical evacuations and returns through Rafah, blocked humanitarian missions, ongoing Israeli strikes, and mutual truce-violation accusations. Strategically, the initiative could accelerate reconstruction and coordination, but exclusion risks and unresolved security control could undermine legitimacy and push Gaza back toward partition or renewed conflict if disarmament and political reintegration fail.
-
128.
CFR reports that U.S. Southern Command’s anti-drug boat strike campaign intensified, with eleven people killed in one day across the Eastern Pacific and Caribbean, making it the deadliest day of the operation this year. The brief notes this brings reported fatalities to at least 144 since September, while the U.S. has not publicly released identities or evidence supporting claims that those killed were tied to trafficking networks. It highlights growing legal and normative challenges, including wrongful-death litigation and expert arguments that lethal force against suspected traffickers is unlawful absent an imminent violent threat. Strategically, the campaign may impose rising legal, reputational, and regional diplomatic costs, suggesting a need for stricter oversight, evidentiary transparency, and greater reliance on interdiction and criminal prosecution rather than expanded military strikes.
-
129.
CFR’s brief argues that simultaneous Geneva negotiations on Iran’s nuclear file and the Ukraine war show the Trump administration trying to position Washington as the indispensable conflict broker, but both tracks remain constrained by major unresolved gaps. The report cites concrete escalation signals and bargaining asymmetries: U.S. military deployments and Iranian drills near Hormuz alongside disagreements over deal scope, and in Ukraine, continued Russian strike pressure and territorial demands despite recent Ukrainian battlefield gains. It also notes mixed diplomatic conditions, including European unease with parts of U.S. positioning and broader geopolitical moves by major powers, indicating a fragmented coalition environment. Strategically, the implication is that U.S. diplomacy may secure partial or phased outcomes at best unless paired with stronger leverage, clearer end-state definitions, and tighter allied coordination.
-
130.
CFR reports that the White House is ending a large immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota after intense backlash, even as the administration says it remains committed to mass deportations. The drawdown follows allegations of due-process violations, aggressive tactics, and the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens, with DHS still claiming thousands of arrests and no full public accounting yet of all detainees. Evidence in the piece suggests the shift is tactical rather than strategic: personnel are being reassigned, not a broader rollback of interior enforcement, and CBP as well as ICE have expanded domestic operations. For policymakers, this raises a near-term tradeoff between enforcement intensity and political/legal sustainability, with DHS funding negotiations likely to hinge on oversight, transparency, and limits on warrantless or masked operations.
-
131.
Greek Foreign Minister George Gerapetritis argued that Europe is in a transition period requiring both stronger strategic autonomy and continued transatlantic cohesion, rather than a rupture with the United States or NATO. He supported higher European defense burden-sharing, warned that a sustainable Ukraine settlement must be fair and sovereignty-based, and maintained confidence that NATO Article 5 remains credible despite current political volatility. On the Middle East, he backed a UN-anchored Gaza stabilization framework, welcomed coordination with the proposed Board of Peace only within a limited Gaza mandate, and stressed that disarming Hamas must be paired with governance and education to prevent renewed extremism. He also framed Greece as a strategic energy and logistics hub and linked EU trade deals with India and Mercosur to a wider strategy of diversification, implying policymakers should reduce overreliance risks while preserving rules-based multilateral institutions.
-
132.Norman E. Alexander Family M Foundation Forum on Science and Foreign Policy: U.S. Science and Research in a Changing Landscape (CFR)
The webinar argues that global oil geopolitics has been fundamentally reshaped by Russia’s war in Ukraine, OPEC+ supply management, and shifting demand centers, even as the energy transition advances. Carolyn Kissane stresses that the world still consumes over 100 million barrels per day, with demand growth concentrated in Asia, while Russia has largely sustained exports by redirecting discounted crude to buyers such as India and China. She also highlights that state-owned producers and OPEC+ coordination continue to exert strong influence on prices, making markets vulnerable when supply is curtailed in already tight conditions. The policy implication is a dual-track strategy: preserve short-term energy security and price stability through diversified supply and contingency tools, while accelerating credible decarbonization pathways that account for uneven capacity and financing constraints across regions.
-
133.
CFR panelists argued that commodity markets have shifted from a demand-led cycle to a supply- and policy-driven regime, with metals (especially gold and silver) rising while oil remains structurally softer. They cited evidence including sustained central-bank gold purchases since the 2022 reserve-freeze shock, growing investor hedging demand, tariff uncertainty under Section 232, and OPEC+/non-OPEC supply conditions that cap oil despite geopolitical tensions. The speakers assessed that oil spikes are still possible from Iran-related disruptions or labor shocks, but likely temporary unless a major outage occurs; baseline Brent expectations clustered around the high-$50s to low-$60s. Strategically, governments and firms should treat commodities as instruments of national security and currency power (including dollar-denominated oil flows), while preparing for persistent precious-metal strength, selective industrial-metal volatility, and policy tradeoffs in U.S.-Venezuela-Canada energy alignment.
-
134.
CFR panelists argued that while Greenland is strategically important for Arctic warning, surveillance, and transatlantic security, U.S. ownership is not necessary to secure core defense interests. They cited the still-valid 1951 U.S.-Denmark defense framework, which already allows expanded U.S. basing and operations, and noted that practical constraints—harsh operating conditions, limited infrastructure, and high costs—undercut both military seizure scenarios and rapid resource exploitation. On critical minerals, speakers stressed that Greenland has potential but development cycles are long, financing is market-driven, and cooperation with allies (especially Denmark, Canada, and Europe) is more realistic than unilateral control. Strategically, the discussion suggests Washington should prioritize negotiated security upgrades and allied supply-chain partnerships, since coercive moves on Greenland would risk damaging NATO cohesion and broader U.S.-Europe coordination.
-
135.2025 Arthur Ross Book Award Ceremony and Meeting: "The Achilles Trap: Saddam Hussein, the C.I.A., and the Origins of America's Invasion of Iraq” (CFR)
At CFR’s 2025 Arthur Ross Book Award ceremony, the central discussion around Steve Coll’s The Achilles Trap argued that the Iraq War stemmed not only from U.S. analytic and policy failures but from a profound misreading of Saddam Hussein’s motives and decision logic. Drawing on newly accessible Iraqi archives, tapes of Saddam’s internal meetings, and interviews, Coll showed that Saddam had largely dismantled key WMD capabilities in 1991 yet preserved ambiguity out of regime psychology, deterrence signaling, and distrust that sanctions would be lifted even with cooperation. The conversation emphasized that U.S. policymakers over-relied on partial intelligence and assumptions, while limited direct contact with Baghdad deepened strategic misperception. The policy implication is to prioritize adversary psychology, maintain calibrated channels of communication with hostile regimes, and apply greater analytic humility before irreversible military decisions.
-
136.
The discussion argues that oil will remain a central geopolitical risk through the near term, even as countries pursue decarbonization, because global demand is still above 100 million barrels per day and continues to rise. Kissane cites evidence that Russia’s war in Ukraine and OPEC+ production cuts have remapped trade flows, tightened supply, and sustained price volatility, while major buyers such as China and India absorb discounted Russian crude. She also notes that energy power is concentrated in a few producers and state-owned firms, with over 75% of global oil controlled by national companies, amplifying political leverage in markets. The strategic implication is that governments should pair energy-transition goals with hard energy-security planning: diversify suppliers, protect critical transport infrastructure, manage strategic reserves prudently, and avoid removing conventional supply faster than resilient alternatives can scale.
-
137.
The article argues that while international climate agreements like the Paris Accord have fostered diplomacy, current national commitments remain insufficient to prevent dangerous global warming, a situation exacerbated by the United States' recent withdrawal from UN climate bodies. Evidence indicates that global temperatures already breached the 1.5°C threshold in 2024, and the U.S. departure from the UNFCCC significantly reduces the organization's funding while signaling a domestic return to fossil fuel prioritization. Consequently, the lack of U.S. participation is expected to delay the global transition to net-zero, forcing a strategic shift toward alternative frameworks like universal carbon pricing and minilateral cooperation through the G20.
-
138.
A 2026 CFR-Morning Consult survey reveals that while Americans generally view trade as a mutually beneficial reciprocal exchange, public opinion on tariffs is deeply fractured along partisan lines. Although nearly half of respondents recognize tariffs as a tax on domestic consumers that increases the cost of living, a significant portion of Republicans views them primarily as a tool for protecting U.S. manufacturing jobs. The findings suggest that while there is broad support for trading with allies and maintaining international rules, there is also growing public desire for congressional guardrails to limit unilateral presidential authority over trade policy.
-
139.
The Trump administration is aggressively expanding Section 232 tariffs across strategic sectors—from semiconductors to pharmaceuticals—to mitigate national security risks and encourage domestic manufacturing. While aimed at countering China, these tariffs disproportionately affect close allies like Canada and Mexico, who remain the primary suppliers of steel, aluminum, and auto parts. This strategy risks trade friction with partners while highlighting persistent vulnerabilities in supply chains, particularly regarding Chinese control of active pharmaceutical ingredients, critical minerals, and drone components.
-
140.
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) honors the legacy of Reverend Jesse L. Jackson Sr., emphasizing his dual impact as a civil rights icon and a dedicated practitioner of international diplomacy. Jackson notably leveraged his influence to negotiate the release of twenty-three American captives in Iraq and Yugoslavia, showcasing the efficacy of non-traditional diplomatic channels. His career exemplified the vital role of religious leadership and humanitarian advocacy in fostering global dialogue and resolving international conflicts. Ultimately, Jackson’s contributions highlight the intersection of social justice and foreign policy as a tool for peace and human dignity.
-
141.
The report argues that the United States must proactively engage Colombia's next administration to support the 2016 Peace Accords and prevent a resurgence of internal conflict. This urgency is driven by incomplete implementation of the peace deal, rising violence against demobilized combatants, and record-high coca production that fuels armed groups like the ELN and Clan del Golfo. Strategic implications include the need for innovative international financing to bridge fiscal gaps and a shift in security cooperation toward stabilizing rural zones to mitigate migration and narcotics flows. Failure to act risks squandering a long-term U.S. foreign policy success and destabilizing the broader Andean region.
-
142.
Vinh Nguyen, a Senior Fellow at CFR and former NSA official, discusses his career trajectory and the evolving challenges of balancing national security with privacy and accountability in the age of artificial intelligence. He argues that while the U.S. must accelerate AI adoption to remain competitive with adversaries like China, it must do so within a democratic framework that preserves legal and ethical standards. Nguyen highlights the urgency of securing AI at its foundational level, noting that technological advancement is currently outpacing security measures and that the government's influence over private-sector tech decisions remains limited. He concludes that both policy frameworks and individual career strategies must rapidly adapt to AI-driven shifts in workflows to maintain a strategic advantage.
-
143.
The expiration of the New START treaty on February 5, 2026, marks the end of formal limits on U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, raising significant risks of a new arms race and strategic miscalculation. Experts warn that the loss of robust verification measures and on-site inspections will erode intelligence precision, likely prompting both superpowers to 'upload' reserve warheads onto existing delivery systems. To maintain stability, U.S. policy must balance necessary modernization—such as reopening submarine missile tubes—with the urgent pursuit of a follow-on agreement that ideally addresses non-strategic weapons and China's growing nuclear capabilities.
-
144.
The Trump administration has announced plans to revoke the 2009 Endangerment Finding, a move described as the largest deregulatory action in U.S. history that removes the legal basis for capping greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. The administration argues that eliminating these regulations will reduce energy costs and bolster American energy dominance, though the decision faces immediate legal challenges that could reach the Supreme Court. This policy pivot risks ceding leadership in the global electric vehicle and clean energy transition to China while further isolating the United States from international climate cooperation.
-
145.
The 2026 Munich Security Conference highlighted a stark divergence between the U.S. administration’s "civilizational" vision and a European counter-vision, prominently led by women, which emphasizes democratic values and increased defense autonomy. While U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio promoted an alliance based on shared Christian heritage and supported illiberal leaders, European figures like Kaja Kallas and Ursula von der Leyen pushed for EU enlargement, increased military spending, and a stronger independent security framework. This rift is accelerating Europe's transition toward strategic self-sufficiency and the potential strengthening of EU mutual defense clauses as a backstop to NATO. Consequently, the transatlantic relationship faces a transformative period where Europe’s agency and commitment to democratic norms increasingly challenge the traditional U.S.-led security architecture.
-
146.
This CSIS analysis maps four potential oil supply disruption scenarios resulting from a possible U.S. military strike against Iran, warning that Tehran's current vulnerability may drive it to target regional energy infrastructure as a last resort. The report details how direct attacks on Arab Gulf facilities could push global oil prices above $130 per barrel, particularly as bypass routes for the Strait of Hormuz remain significantly limited in capacity. These dynamics present a strategic dilemma for the Trump administration, where escalating military pressure could trigger a global energy crisis or a 'use it or lose it' miscalculation by Iranian leadership.
-
147.
The 'frozen conflict' in Transnistria has reached a critical turning point as Russia's loss of energy leverage and Moldova's EU trajectory create a unique three-year window for full reintegration. Since the cessation of Russian gas transit through Ukraine in early 2025, Transnistria’s subsidized economy has faced collapse, shifting the balance of power toward Chisinau and exposing the fragility of Russian patronage. Successful reintegration will require Moldova to implement a comprehensive roadmap for security vetting and legal harmonization, supported by international diplomatic pressure for Russian troop withdrawal and EU financial aid to manage the transition to market-rate energy.
-
148.
The U.S. and Iran face a volatile '50/50' chance of either military conflict or a symbolic diplomatic framework as an unprecedented U.S. military build-up meets low-trust negotiations in Geneva. While the Trump administration seeks a high-profile declaration of victory, Iran demands a formal negotiated text to ensure sanctions relief amid internal social unrest and Israeli pressure for preemption. Gulf states are actively mediating to avoid a regional war that would jeopardize their multi-billion dollar transitions into global AI and digital hubs. Consequently, any tactical miscalculation, particularly involving proxies like the Houthis, could trigger a wider entanglement with severe global economic and security repercussions.
-
149.
This report highlights a surge in state-level policy initiatives across India, focusing on healthcare decentralization, industrial specialization, and administrative reform. Key developments include Haryana’s block-level mental health scheme, Kerala’s strategic Graphene Policy, and Maharashtra’s efforts to streamline land conversion and public-private partnerships. These actions suggest that Indian states are increasingly taking the lead in creating tailored regulatory environments to address local needs and foster innovation. Such trends underscore the importance of subnational governance in shaping India's broader economic and social policy landscape.
-
150.
The Trump administration's proposed Forum on Resource Geostrategic Engagement (FORGE) represents a rare shift toward multilateralism, aimed at securing critical mineral supply chains through a 'preferential trade zone' with enforceable price floors. This initiative reflects a recognition that the U.S. cannot solve its dependency on China alone, though its success depends on whether the administration can treat partners as equals rather than targets for leverage. While significant, FORGE likely remains a pragmatic exception driven by economic necessity rather than a fundamental abandonment of 'America First' unilateralism.
-
151.
Chatham House argues that many Middle Eastern governments now oppose a US strike on Iran because their threat perception has shifted from fear of Iranian regional dominance to concern about Israeli escalation and the consequences of an Iranian state collapse. It points to the weakening of Iran’s “Axis of Resistance” after 7 October 2023, Israeli military pressure across the region, Assad’s fall, and heightened Gulf alarm after Israel’s September 2025 strike on Doha as evidence of this shift. The analysis says regime-change war and broad containment are viewed by Arab states as dangerous and historically ineffective, with high risks of fragmentation, migration, militancy, and regional spillover. The policy implication is to favor de-escalation and targeted, policy-based pressure on Iran’s nuclear, missile, and proxy activities through diplomacy rather than large-scale military action.
-
152.
Chatham House argues that middle powers can retain meaningful agency in an AI system dominated by the US and China by pursuing "sovereign AI" strategies tailored to national interests. The paper identifies four practical pathways: specialize in a strategic segment of the AI supply chain, align with one superpower, pool sovereignty through partnerships with peers, or hedge by combining capabilities from multiple providers. Its reasoning is that full technological independence is unrealistic, but selective control over how AI is adopted and governed is still achievable. For policymakers, the priority is to choose and sequence these strategies based on domestic strengths and risk tolerance so AI deployment serves national and public-interest goals despite structural dependence on US and Chinese ecosystems.
-
153.
Chatham House argues that US global influence remains substantial but is increasingly perceived as declining, particularly in economic terms, as China, India and Russia gain weight. The analysis points to policy volatility and experimentation across major dossiers, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Paris climate accord, the Iran nuclear deal, and relations with the EU, Russia and North Korea. At the same time, persistent transnational challenges such as trade, climate change, nuclear risk and terrorism are presented as areas where US engagement is still indispensable. The strategic implication is that Washington’s credibility will depend less on unilateral dominance and more on consistent, coalition-based leadership in managing shared global risks.
-
154.
Chatham House argues that Russia’s invasion is not only devastating Ukraine physically but also accelerating a deeper political transition away from entrenched old-rule networks and vested interests. Its reasoning is that Ukraine was already under internal pressure for reform, and wartime mobilization has intensified public demand for new rules and empowered a newer generation of policymakers. The analysis also stresses that sustained external backing for Ukraine’s defense is structurally shaping the country’s postwar trajectory, making a return to prewar political equilibrium unlikely. Policy-wise, partners should pair military support with long-term institution-building and governance reform assistance to lock in a more resilient Ukrainian state.
-
155.
Chatham House argues that the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack and Israel’s subsequent Gaza campaign exposed a fundamental failure in long-running international policy on the Israel–Palestine conflict. The core finding is that regional normalization and economic engagement with Israel were pursued while the Palestine question was sidelined, making the overall approach unstable. The article reasons that international actors, including major donors and the United States, deprioritized peace-process work, settlement expansion, Palestinian governance and accountability, and societal bridge-building, which deepened structural drivers of conflict. For policy strategy, it implies that durable stability requires re-centering these root issues rather than relying on crisis management or normalization alone.
-
156.
Chatham House argues that Assad’s abrupt fall in December 2024 revealed Syria’s state fragility, the limited capacity of Iran and Russia to sustain him, and the strategic failure of past Western policy. It reasons that Syria’s transition will be shaped by neighboring states—especially Turkey, Jordan, Israel, and Lebanon—which see both security risks and geopolitical openings as a new government seeks reconstruction support. The analysis highlights Lebanon’s governance stress from Hezbollah’s weakening after conflict with Israel, and Jordan’s added vulnerability as U.S. policy under President Donald Trump may intensify West Bank dynamics. Policy strategy should therefore prioritize a genuinely Syrian-led political transition, disciplined regional burden-sharing, and early safeguards against spillover instability in Lebanon and Jordan while avoiding prior external policy mistakes.
-
157.
Chatham House argues that technology governance has expanded from a narrow cyber focus into a broad policy domain because the internet now underpins government, private-sector, and civil-society activity. It notes that while debate is often framed as national security versus personal privacy, a more significant challenge is the market dominance of US technology firms combined with weak and inconsistent regulation. The analysis implies that existing governance approaches are poorly matched to transnational platform power and produce legal uncertainty across jurisdictions. Strategically, policymakers should pursue more coordinated cross-border rules and stronger accountability and competition frameworks for dominant tech companies.
-
158.
Chatham House argues that Trump’s energy-dominance agenda is delivering visible short-term gains in US oil and LNG output, but global market dynamics make sustained political control over energy trajectories difficult. The article points to record US oil production, LNG export growth above 20%, coal-plant retention measures, and ambitious nuclear expansion goals, while also noting renewables still took most new US power capacity in 2025 and globally covered all demand growth as they surpassed coal in generation. It emphasizes that energy investment cycles run 5–10 years, so current outcomes reflect earlier decisions and require long policy continuity to lock in structural change. For strategy, the US may gain near-term geopolitical leverage over prices and supply chains, but allies’ mixed responses, persistent renewable cost competitiveness, and deeper US exposure to hydrocarbon regions limit long-term dominance and complicate policy tradeoffs.
-
159.
Chatham House argues that mega AI summits are useful for networking and agenda-setting but are unlikely to deliver meaningful international governance agreements. The reasoning is that forums like the New Delhi AI Impact Summit are too crowded and politically fragmented, with competing national and commercial priorities, while US–China rivalry and weakening multilateral norms make binding global deals improbable. It cites recent summit outcomes as mostly non-binding and principles-based, and points to more promising progress in smaller scientist-led, technical-standards, and regional venues that can build trust and produce operational proposals. The strategic implication is to prioritize a “splinter to scale” approach: develop tested, inclusive governance tools in focused forums, then scale them through larger diplomatic platforms with middle-power backing.
-
160.
The podcast argues that deep-sea mining is becoming a major geopolitical issue as governments race to secure critical minerals for energy transition and strategic industries. Drawing on expert analysis from Carnegie and CSIS, it frames seabed resource competition as driven by supply-chain security, industrial policy, and power politics at sea rather than climate needs alone. The discussion suggests that weak or contested international governance could sharpen interstate rivalry while environmental uncertainty increases political risk. The policy implication is to pair any resource-access strategy with stronger multilateral rules, precautionary environmental standards, and broader diversification of critical-mineral sources.
-
161.
Chatham House argues that African mining has become a core geopolitical and economic arena, and that African governments must take more strategic roles to secure development gains from the critical minerals race. The Institute cites its engagement at Mining Indaba 2026, including ministerial discussions and a UNDP-facilitated roundtable, as evidence that debates are shifting from resource nationalism toward active state participation in mining and processing value chains. Its experts emphasize that US and other responses to China’s supply-chain dominance are restructuring global markets, raising the stakes for countries without equity or policy leverage. Strategically, the piece implies African policymakers should align permitting, industrialization, and infrastructure planning with stronger state-industry coordination to capture long-term value and avoid marginalization.
-
162.
Chatham House argues that Trump’s Gaza peace framework could entrench Palestinian fragmentation rather than resolve the conflict, resulting in a depoliticized enclave and a permanently weakened statehood project. It contends that UNSCR 2803 places decision-making in externally controlled bodies with minimal Palestinian authority, while treating statehood as conditional and deferring meaningful political integration of Gaza and the West Bank until at least December 31, 2027. The analysis further cites the Kushner-led redevelopment approach and reconstruction sequencing in Israeli-controlled areas as likely to create “two Gazas,” alongside accelerating de facto West Bank annexation through Israeli policy measures. The policy implication is that Arab and European governments should not back implementation unconditionally, but instead push for binding safeguards linking Gaza and the West Bank, rights-based UN parameters, and credible consequences for annexation.
-
163.
Chatham House argues that repealing the 2009 EPA endangerment finding is a strategic own goal: it may reduce near-term regulatory pressure, but it undermines US long-term economic and technological power. The paper cites estimates that rollbacks could add 7.9-15.3 billion metric tons of emissions by 2055, while also locking US automakers into legacy internal-combustion technologies as global EV adoption accelerates. It contends that lower regulation does not solve competitiveness because EVs often have lower lifetime operating costs, and global demand is shifting toward cleaner vehicles, with EV sales reaching 20.7 million in 2025. Strategically, the implication is that US policy should treat emissions and efficiency standards as industrial policy, sustaining investment in batteries, electrification, and clean-tech supply chains to avoid ceding market share and influence to China.
-
164.
The article argues that Europe’s sovereignty debate is increasingly split between an integrationist strategy (more EU-level coordination, financing, and industrial policy) and a deregulatory growth strategy (less bureaucracy, stronger national competitiveness). It supports this by contrasting leaders and policy preferences: Macron and Draghi push pooled instruments such as joint procurement and common financing, while De Wever, Merz, and Meloni prioritize regulatory simplification and nationally driven industrial revival. The piece warns that the main danger is not institutional rupture but policy incoherence, where parallel national and EU initiatives in defense and energy create duplication and underpowered outcomes. Strategically, it suggests the most viable path is a calibrated hybrid: selective integration in scale-dependent sectors (defense, tech, energy infrastructure) combined with targeted deregulation to restore growth, with Germany’s choices likely to determine whether that synthesis holds.
-
165.Despite reset in India–US relations, New Delhi retains commitment to strategic hedging (Chatham House)
Chatham House argues that the February 6 India-US tariff deal marks only a partial reset, while New Delhi continues its long-standing strategy of hedging rather than aligning fully with Washington. Although US tariffs on India reportedly fell from 50% to 18% in exchange for major Indian purchase commitments and a pledge to stop Russian oil imports, implementation remains ambiguous because Indian state refiners still buy Russian crude and enforcement details are unclear. The article also notes political and economic constraints on both sides, including India’s sensitivity over agriculture, uncertainty over alternative oil supply, and persistent risk that the US could reimpose tariffs. Strategically, India is likely to keep diversifying trade, energy, and defense ties across multiple partners, implying a more transactional India-US relationship with limited US leverage over India’s broader foreign-policy autonomy.
-
166.
The podcast argues that Marco Rubio’s more diplomatic style toward Europe likely masks continuity, not change, in the Trump administration’s tougher strategic line. The key reasoning is the contrast in tone with JD Vance’s earlier confrontational remarks, while the underlying themes remained similar: Europe should carry more burden on security and adapt to a less accommodating US posture. Discussion points on Ukraine, drone and defense innovation, and Chinese industrial competition reinforce that transatlantic pressure is widening from military support to technology and economic resilience. The policy implication is that European governments and firms should plan for sustained US demands by accelerating defense capacity, coordinating long-term Ukraine support, and strengthening competitiveness against China.
-
167.Chatham House appoints Professor Marc Weller as the new Director of the Global Governance and Security Centre (Chatham House)
Chatham House’s announcement frames Marc Weller’s appointment as a leadership move to strengthen the Global Governance and Security Centre at a moment when international order is under strain. The core claim is that, despite geopolitical fragmentation, urgent transnational problems still require rule-based global cooperation on security, health preparedness, AI governance, and international law. The institute supports this by highlighting Weller’s credentials across academia, UN mediation and legal advisory roles, and recent policy interventions on Gaza, Ukraine, Venezuela, and broader legal-system defense. Strategically, the appointment signals a push for more active institutional reform and coalition-building among governments, business, and civil society to preserve and update multilateral governance frameworks.
-
168.
Chatham House argues that as the US turns inward and multilateral institutions weaken, the Global South is becoming a central arena of geopolitical and economic competition in which Japan is an increasingly important actor. Evidence came from a January 2026 expert event at Japan House London, where specialists assessed how Global South countries are reacting to great-power rivalry, including China’s expanding role, and compared Japanese, US, and Chinese approaches. The discussion suggests influence will depend less on rhetoric and more on how partner countries in the Global South perceive concrete differences in engagement models. For policy, Japan and like-minded states should design pragmatic, development-focused partnerships aligned with Global South priorities and recognize these countries as active shapers of the emerging global order.
-
169.
The article argues that the Munich Security Conference exposed a deepening political-strategic split inside the West, even as leaders tried to project unity on core security issues. It cites Marco Rubio’s speech as emblematic: he reassured Europe that it still matters to Washington, but paired that with hard limits on U.S. support and warnings that America will act unilaterally when allies resist. The piece also points to contrasting interventions by Wang Yi, Keir Starmer, and Volodymyr Zelenskyy to show how states are recalibrating between U.S.-China rivalry and uncertain transatlantic cohesion. Strategically, it implies European governments should prepare for more conditional U.S. backing, invest in autonomous defense and diplomatic capacity, and pursue flexible coalitions to manage both Russia-related threats and wider great-power competition.
-
170.As the UK lurches from crisis to crisis, is it becoming ungovernable? Independent Thinking podcast (Chatham House)
The podcast argues that the UK’s repeated political crises and rapid prime-ministerial turnover may reflect deeper structural governance weaknesses rather than isolated leadership problems. It points to six prime ministers in roughly a decade, ongoing pressure on Keir Starmer’s government, and Labour’s exposure in upcoming local elections as signs of systemic instability. The discussion also situates the UK alongside European peers facing similar governing strains, suggesting broader institutional and political fragmentation. For policymakers and strategists, the implication is to prioritize reforms that improve governing durability, electoral legitimacy, and crisis-management capacity rather than relying on short-term leadership fixes alone.
-
171.Chatham House fellow gives evidence to UK House of Lords on legality of US actions in Venezuela (Chatham House)
Professor Marc Weller argues that US actions in Venezuela reflect a widening use-of-force rationale that risks breaching core international law principles. In evidence to the UK House of Lords International Relations and Defence Committee, he evaluated the US legal justifications, questioned whether Monroe Doctrine-style claims can fit modern legal limits, and traced a broader shift in US legal positioning over the past decade. He warned that proliferating state justifications for force in pursuit of national interests weakens the credibility of the rules-based international order. Strategically, the testimony suggests policymakers should tighten legal scrutiny of intervention claims and strengthen multilateral support for non-use-of-force norms, including partnerships with developing countries defending international law.
-
172.
The article argues that NATO is entering a structural shift: many Europeans now define “doing more” as long-term strategic autonomy, while the US still expects greater European spending within US-led command, planning, and procurement frameworks. It supports this with evidence of collapsing European trust in the US, strong public backing for deeper EU military integration, and concrete moves such as oversubscribed EU defense funding instruments and tighter regional cooperation. Although Europe still faces near-term capability and coordination gaps, the author says current rearmament and political momentum are unlikely to reverse even if US politics change. The policy implication is that Washington and NATO need explicit planning for a more independent Europe now, or face growing alliance friction over command, capabilities, and defense-industrial choices.
-
173.
The article argues that the Munich Security Conference is underweighting climate and environmental risks, even though they are structural drivers of instability and should be treated as core security priorities. It points to climate’s reduced visibility in the 2026 MSC agenda and report, parallel downgrading in other fora, and country cases (including Haiti, Yemen, and Myanmar) where degraded livelihoods, water stress, and climate shocks worsened violence and undermined ceasefires. The author’s reasoning is that security analysis, conflict resolution, and peacebuilding fail when they ignore land, water, food, and energy pressures that shape grievances and state legitimacy. Policy-wise, it calls for embedding land restoration, water access, and climate-resilient livelihoods into stabilization and reconstruction, and advancing practical regional cooperation (e.g., EU, OSCE, NATO, AU) where global consensus is weak.
-
174.
Chatham House argues that the African Union’s handling of Sudan has become a major leadership failure and that the February 2026 AU summit is a narrow chance to reset strategy before state fragmentation becomes irreversible. It cites the scale of the crisis (about two-thirds of 53 million people needing aid, 13.6 million displaced, and nearly half facing severe food insecurity) and shows how AU inconsistency and weak enforcement have reduced leverage over both the SAF and RSF. The paper also highlights a fragmented mediation landscape, with the US-led Quad, AU-led Quintet, and AU internal mechanisms pulling in different directions while key regional actors are widely perceived as biased. For policy, it recommends the AU reassert primacy, enforce norm-consistent neutrality, and link ceasefire/humanitarian negotiations to a unified AU-led political process to increase pressure on the warring parties and limit wider regional spillover.
-
175.
The episode argues that the African Union’s new leadership enters office at a critical moment, with hopes of institutional renewal but mounting pressure from a weakening multilateral system. It points to intensifying regional conflicts, fragile economic recovery, and stressed political settlements across several African states as core tests that could limit AU effectiveness. The discussion also highlights a tougher external context: shifting global priorities and reduced international attention to Africa, which raises the cost of inaction. Strategically, this implies AU policymakers should prioritize conflict prevention, stronger continental coordination, and more self-directed diplomacy to protect African interests in a less supportive global order.
-
176.
Chatham House argues that a stronger Japan under Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi would be broadly beneficial for Asia by helping balance both Chinese dominance and excessive dependence on the United States. The piece reasons that many Asian governments value Japan’s predictable diplomacy, investment record, and growing security cooperation, especially as China’s military pressure rises and multilateral institutions weaken. It also notes major constraints: Takaichi’s tax-cut and spending agenda is fiscally difficult, constitutional military reform faces high political hurdles, and Tokyo is under simultaneous pressure from Beijing and Washington. Strategically, the article implies Japan should build domestic economic resilience while deepening ties with India, Southeast Asia, and other US allies (such as the UK and Australia) and stabilizing relations with China to avoid regional escalation.
-
177.
Chatham House argues that Bangladesh’s 12 February 2026 election is a pivotal test of democratic transition after the 2024 ouster of Sheikh Hasina, but it is unfolding in a volatile, reconfigured political arena. The report’s reasoning centers on the ban of the Awami League, BNP’s leadership shift under Tarique Rahman, and the unexpected 11-party Jamaat–NCP alliance, alongside polling that shows a tight BNP–Jamaat contest and a decisive youth electorate. It also highlights mounting instability, including killings of activists, intra-opposition tensions, and a major information-war environment marked by bots, deepfakes, decontextualized religious clips, and cross-border disinformation allegations. The policy implication is that domestic and international actors should prioritize election security, violence prevention, and information-integrity measures while supporting inclusive political competition so institutional legitimacy can survive the transition.
-
178.
The article argues that a tougher Trump approach to Cuba may raise pressure on Havana, but is unlikely to produce a quick Venezuela-style political breakthrough. It points to Cuba’s deepening economic and energy crisis after losing subsidized Venezuelan oil, while emphasizing the regime’s durable control through the Communist Party, security institutions, and weak, fragmented domestic opposition. It also notes that U.S. law (especially the 1992 and 1996 embargo statutes) sharply limits what any administration can offer unless major democratic conditions are met, constraining deal-making. Strategically, this suggests Washington risks worsening humanitarian conditions and migration flows without guaranteed regime change, so policy should combine pressure with realistic transition benchmarks and crisis contingency planning.
-
179.
The article argues that recent military and political moves in Syria have delivered a major strategic setback to Kurdish self-rule, while leaving only limited, conditional gains. Damascus’s January offensive pushed the SDF back, defections accelerated Kurdish losses, and subsequent agreements on 18 and 30 January forced Kurdish integration into state structures while conceding key assets like oil fields, border crossings, and Qamishli airport. Although the later deal preserved some Kurdish representation and localized institutional staffing, the broader trend is toward a centralized Syrian state backed by Washington, Ankara, and Gulf states, with fragile trust over implementation. For policy, this implies prioritizing monitoring and enforcement of Kurdish rights commitments, anticipating renewed center-periphery friction, and accounting for both Kurdish political vulnerability and rising cross-border Kurdish solidarity.
-
180.Oil, regime change, and what's next in Trump’s MAGA playbook? Independent Thinking podcast (Chatham House)
The podcast argues that a prospective Trump-era MAGA foreign-policy approach in the Americas would be driven by hard-power politics in which oil, regime pressure, and transactional security goals are tightly linked. The discussion uses the so-called ‘Donroe Doctrine,’ Marco Rubio’s Cuba agenda, and Haiti as case studies to show how energy interests and political intervention are being framed as mutually reinforcing tools of U.S. influence. It also points to governance and security reform debates in Haiti as evidence that regional instability is being treated less as a humanitarian issue and more as a strategic one. For policymakers, the implication is that governments in the region should prepare for more coercive, interest-first U.S. engagement and adjust diplomatic, energy, and domestic resilience strategies accordingly.
-
181.
Chatham House argues that Nouri al-Maliki’s brief comeback bid exposed how Iraq’s political system remains highly vulnerable to external power competition despite official claims of restored sovereignty. The article cites Iran’s rapid backing of Maliki through networks tied to the Coordination Framework and PMF-linked actors, alongside Washington’s late but forceful intervention (including Trump’s public warning) to block an Iran-aligned outcome. It also frames Maliki’s candidacy as a break from Iraq’s post-2003 pattern of selecting weak consensus premiers, showing how quickly elite bargains can shift under foreign pressure. Strategically, the piece implies Iraq’s near-term stability depends on fast government formation, tighter management of militia-state fragmentation, and a balancing approach that reduces exposure to escalating US-Iran confrontation.
-
182.
Chatham House argues that Africa’s strong headline growth outlook in 2026 (IMF: 4.3% average GDP growth) obscures weaker per-capita gains and major financing constraints. The discussion points to persistent debt burdens and declining official development assistance as core risks that could prevent projected growth from translating into broad development progress. It emphasizes untapped policy options for economic transformation and a larger role for regional financial institutions in supporting country-led development priorities. The policy implication is to pair growth strategies with debt sustainability measures, reduced aid dependence, and stronger regional financing architecture to deliver more inclusive and durable outcomes.
-
183.The reopening of the Rafah crossing provides some hope for Palestinians, but can it be sustained? (Chatham House)
Chatham House argues that reopening Rafah is a meaningful but fragile breakthrough: it restores a limited non-Israeli outlet for Gazans, yet remains vulnerable to political, security, and operational reversal. Evidence cited includes very low initial crossing numbers, Israeli pre-clearance and vetting rules, reported harassment, and historical patterns in which security incidents, monitoring bottlenecks, and factional competition repeatedly led to closure or violence. The paper also notes Israeli domestic electoral pressures, far-right opposition, and concerns over smuggling, all of which could undermine implementation of the wider October 2025 ceasefire framework and Gaza reconstruction plans. Strategically, the implication is that external actors should prioritize robust monitoring, transparent crossing governance, and sustained diplomatic pressure to prevent backsliding, while recognizing that continued closure would deepen despair and likely fuel renewed instability.
-
184.
The article argues that Mario Draghi is not calling for an immediate EU superstate, but for "pragmatic federalism" that gives Europe real decision-making authority in strategic domains. It reasons that loose intergovernmental coordination, especially in defense and foreign policy, leaves the EU economically strong but politically weak, while examples like the euro and the ECB show that functional federal-style authority can work without full constitutional federalism. Draghi therefore favors flexible integration among willing states, potentially outside formal EU structures at first, with late entry open to others, similar to Schengen’s path. Strategically, this implies prioritizing coalition-based institutional deepening in defense, industrial policy, taxation, and diplomacy to increase European power without waiting for politically unlikely treaty-level overhaul.
-
185.
Chatham House argues that the Trump administration’s critical minerals push is less about outproducing China and more about building a geopolitically selective supply system led by Washington. The article points to the February 4 ministerial, the $12 billion “Project Vault” stockpile plan, and the FORGE platform (with proposed price floors) as evidence of serious US state-backed market shaping tied to alliance politics. It warns that investor confidence depends on long-horizon policy credibility, and that partisan attacks on prior administrations’ mineral programs can signal future policy reversals, raising stranded-asset risk. Strategically, the US should institutionalize these initiatives across agencies and administrations, prioritize trusted partners while expanding real new supply (including copper), and sustain long-term political de-risking in places like the DRC.
-
186.
The article argues that the EU’s 2026 designation of the IRGC as a terrorist organization marks a decisive break from three decades of engagement-based Iran policy. It says Europe’s old balance of pressure and dialogue collapsed after cumulative shocks: Iran’s military support to Russia after 2022, repression following Mahsa Amini’s death, failure to restore the nuclear deal in 2023, and UN snapback sanctions in 2025. The immediate trigger was the scale of the early-2026 crackdown, which convinced European governments there were no credible Iranian interlocutors left and that non-designation carried unacceptable reputational costs. Strategically, the move raises legal and compliance risks for EU and non-EU firms tied to Iran while likely reducing the EU’s diplomatic leverage, leaving Europe more sidelined in US-Iran decision-making.
-
187.
Chatham House argues that Saif al-Islam Gaddafi’s killing ends the last credible political center of gravity for Libya’s pro-Gaddafi camp and signals deeper power consolidation, not national reset. The analysis says his practical influence had faded since 2021, but his symbolic legitimacy and potential electoral comeback still threatened both the Tripoli-based GNU and Haftar-aligned actors. It also finds that Saif was the only figure able to unify fragmented “Green” constituencies, so his death weakens their collective leverage and eases Haftar family efforts to tighten command structures. For policy, the near-term risk is limited retaliatory violence, while the bigger strategic implication is a more entrenched elite order that complicates reconciliation, credible elections, and inclusive governance.
-
188.
Chatham House argues that global governance in 2026 can no longer treat economic/financial governance and digital-technology governance as separate domains. The event supports this by centering practical cross-cutting questions on digital currencies, AI’s economic impact, reform bottlenecks, and how global shocks affect both systems at once. Its core reasoning is that technological competition and retreat from multilateralism have created shared risks and interdependent policy choices across these fields. The policy implication is that governments should build integrated governance strategies, strengthen emerging economies’ influence in rule-shaping, and use digital tools to modernize economic and financial governance capacity.
-
189.
Chatham House argues that the 2026 security environment is being transformed by overlapping geopolitical, military, and technological shocks that are testing established alliances and institutions. Its reasoning highlights NATO burden-sharing strains around 5% defence spending targets, strategic recalibration under a renewed Trump administration, China’s military modernization alongside Indo-Pacific flashpoints, and persistent interstate/proxy conflicts in the Middle East. It also emphasizes that climate-conflict dynamics, critical materials competition, and increasingly sophisticated cyber and espionage activity are blurring traditional warfighting domains. The policy implication is that governments and industry should prioritize cross-domain strategy, stronger public-private defence partnerships, and more efficient use of rising defence budgets to build resilience and credible deterrence.
-
190.
The Chatham House event argues that late-2025 Saudi-UAE friction over Yemen reflects a deeper strategic split, not just a tactical disagreement in one conflict. The core evidence is their opposing local alignments: the UAE’s backing of the Southern Transitional Council and southern autonomy versus Saudi support for Yemen’s internationally recognized government and territorial unity. Saudi efforts to freeze front lines and push a political settlement, alongside the UAE’s announced full withdrawal, exposed incompatible views of Yemen’s future security and governance architecture. Strategically, this suggests Gulf coordination will be less automatic, and policymakers should treat Yemen as a test case for wider Riyadh-Abu Dhabi divergence in regional influence, security priorities, and economic statecraft.
-
191.
The article argues that Kenya is moving from a primarily regional leadership role toward a broader, more assertive global foreign policy posture in response to a shifting world order. Its reasoning centers on Kenya’s 2024 strategy, which combines regional integration goals with diversified external partnerships, including longstanding Western security and economic ties, a strategic partnership with China, and expanding links with the UAE. Kenya’s engagement in multilateral security efforts, including the multinational mission in Haiti, is presented as evidence of its willingness to project influence beyond East Africa despite domestic protest pressures and regional conflict risks. Strategically, this suggests Kenya is pursuing pragmatic multi-alignment to maximize diplomatic leverage, trade and financing opportunities, while managing the risks of geopolitical balancing and policy overextension.
-
192.
The event’s core argument is that violent extremism in West Africa cannot be contained by national responses because insecurity from the Lake Chad Basin to western Mali is fundamentally cross-border. Speakers point to the erosion of regional mechanisms after coups in the central Sahel, with stalled cooperation on hot pursuit, joint operations, intelligence sharing, and disruption of illicit finance, while Mali’s fuel blockade illustrates hard economic-security interdependence for landlocked states. The discussion suggests that parallel security blocs alone will be insufficient unless trust is rebuilt between Sahel and coastal states through practical bilateral and regional arrangements. Policy priorities therefore include restoring interoperable regional frameworks, creating confidence-building mechanisms among governments, and pairing military coordination with strategies that address underlying political and socio-economic drivers of insecurity.
-
193.
Chatham House argues that climate action and the energy transition now face a more volatile geopolitical and economic context, where rivalry, securitization, and domestic political pressures could derail progress. The conference framing highlights interacting risks: worsening climate impacts, fragile supply chains, resource competition (especially for critical minerals), and linked stresses in water, biodiversity, and land use that can create new dependencies and inequalities. Its reasoning is that these pressures are converging across global governance, markets, and local societies, making “business as usual” strategies inadequate. The strategic implication is that governments, firms, and civil society need coordinated, multi-stakeholder approaches that integrate energy security, affordability, and justice with broader resource-resilience planning.
-
194.
The event argues that defending Ukraine’s cultural, linguistic, and religious sovereignty is essential to any durable peace, because identity policy is directly tied to state security. It cites post-2014 reforms such as de-communization laws, language requirements in public life, and the 2019 independence of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine as evidence of Kyiv’s effort to reduce Russian imperial influence while maintaining private minority-language use. The discussion frames Russia’s full-scale war and negotiation demands (including restoring Russian influence networks and elevating Russian language status) as tools to weaken Ukrainian statehood from within. Strategically, it implies that peace terms must protect Ukraine’s control over domestic identity policy, while balancing EU-aligned minority-rights standards and prioritizing cultural heritage protection in recovery planning.
-
195.
Chatham House argues that health literacy is a core lever for health inclusivity and, by extension, national economic resilience in a more competitive and fragmented geopolitical environment. The event frames the case through Economist Impact’s Health Inclusivity Index findings and practical case studies, linking stronger prevention and better individual health decisions to higher productivity, labour participation, and lower social welfare burdens. Its reasoning is that conflict, aid shifts, and economic imbalances are widening disparities, so coordinated action by governments, business, and civil society is needed to scale effective local models while keeping them grounded in lived experience. The strategic implication is that policymakers should treat health literacy as an economic and health-security investment, using cross-sector partnerships, measurable outcomes, and adaptable cross-border implementation models.
-
196.
Chatham House argues that global trade is entering a structurally unstable phase in which economic security, geopolitical rivalry, and nationalism increasingly override traditional free-trade norms. The conference framing points to major drivers: a reoriented US trade posture under the second Trump administration, mounting pressure on the WTO and rules-based system, securitized supply chains, and intensified competition over technology and critical materials. It also highlights uneven regional adaptation, with Asian economies seeking growth opportunities while European governments struggle to balance competitiveness, resilience, and domestic political pressures. The strategic implication is that governments and firms should prioritize risk management, supply-chain resilience, and coalition-based rule-setting, while preparing for deeper fragmentation if multilateral mechanisms continue to weaken.
-
197.
Chatham House frames Hungary’s 12 April 2026 election as a pivotal contest for both Hungary and the EU, with the potential to alter Europe’s political trajectory. The core argument is that Viktor Orbán’s long rule—marked by hardline migration policy, weakened judicial independence, and closer ties with Russia—has created sustained conflict with Brussels and concerns about democratic backsliding. The event highlights Péter Magyar and the TISZA movement as Orbán’s strongest challenger in years, citing polling that suggests a plausible upset and a pro-EU, centrist alternative. Strategically, the outcome could either reinforce Hungary’s current sovereigntist path or trigger a policy reset toward EU alignment, with spillover effects on the momentum of right-leaning populist forces across Europe.
-
198.The UK critical minerals strategy: Building national resilience through global political and commercial collaboration (Chatham House)
Chatham House’s event framing argues that the UK’s new Critical Minerals Strategy is centered on reducing supply-chain vulnerability while preserving international openness. The core reasoning is that critical minerals are now indispensable to UK manufacturing, clean energy deployment, and industrial competitiveness, but exposure to geopolitical rivalry and demand shocks creates strategic risk. The strategy therefore combines domestic capability-building with deeper political and commercial collaboration with partner countries and industry actors. For policy, this implies a dual-track approach: strengthen national resilience at home while institutionalizing trusted international partnerships to secure long-term access in a contested global minerals market.
-
199.
Chatham House’s event frames the war in Ukraine as a hard-power contest whose outcome will shape Europe’s wider security order. General Valerii Zaluzhnyi is positioned to argue that battlefield developments should directly inform diplomatic expectations about war termination rather than optimism detached from military realities. The session emphasizes building a common European security strategy, with specific focus on the UK’s role and Ukraine’s contribution to allied defence and deterrence capacity. For policymakers, the implication is to prioritize long-term military readiness, tighter UK-Europe-Ukraine coordination, and strategy grounded in operational conditions on the front.
-
200.
The event argues that Belarus’s regime is using selective prisoner releases as tactical diplomacy rather than signaling genuine political liberalization, while domestic hopes for democratic change have sharply receded since 2020. As evidence, it highlights the late-2025 release and deportation of 123 political prisoners, including Ales Bialiatski and Maria Kalesnikava, framed as a gesture to the US administration amid ongoing repression. The discussion centers on how current US–Belarus contacts should be interpreted and what kind of Western approach can still preserve pressure for political change. The policy implication is that Western governments should pursue conditional engagement tied to concrete human-rights outcomes, avoid normalizing authoritarian rule, and sustain long-term support for Belarusian democratic forces in exile and at home.
-
201.
Chatham House frames Trump’s conflict strategy as a deliberate break from traditional diplomacy, centered on his pledge to act as a “peacemaker and unifier” through high-pressure dealmaking. The core logic is transactional: use US leverage to force adversaries into negotiations and lock in outcomes across multiple conflicts, including Ukraine, Gaza, the South Caucasus, and the DRC. The event description highlights mixed and disputed results, arguing that while this approach can create openings, it also unsettles allies and even parts of Trump’s domestic base that see tension with an America First posture. For policymakers, the key implication is that US-led peacemaking may become more coercive and personalized, requiring partners to adapt quickly while planning for uneven sustainability and credibility risks across simultaneous theaters.
-
202.
The event argues that Libya’s central challenge is political fragmentation: despite a sustained ‘no war, no peace’ environment, rival western and eastern administrations, weak institutions, and economic deterioration continue to block reunification. The reasoning is that national reconciliation and electoral progress are interdependent, with the Presidency Council and UN mediation both needing to bridge factional divides while restoring social cohesion and state legitimacy. It highlights practical constraints—rising inflation, declining purchasing power, contested authority, and transnational pressures such as organized migration crime—that make delay costly even before a new government is formed. Policy-wise, the implication is to prioritize coordinated support for institution-building, credible election preparation, and economic governance reforms while aligning international engagement with Libyan-led reconciliation efforts.
-
203.Defending NATO’s eastern flank: How Romania is responding to Russian aggression and European rearmament (Chatham House)
The event argues that Romania has become a pivotal frontline state in defending NATO’s eastern flank as Russia’s war against Ukraine reshapes European security. It points to Romania’s exposure to nearby Russian drone incidents, intensified information warfare, and Black Sea military operations, alongside NATO’s decision to host its largest base on Romanian territory, as evidence of its strategic centrality. Romania’s foreign minister frames continued support for Ukraine, defense modernization, and sustained military investment as core to deterrence and alliance resilience. The policy implication is that European rearmament must accelerate and remain coordinated, especially if US engagement in Europe becomes less reliable, to credibly deter further Russian coercion.
-
204.
Chatham House argues that Russia’s sustained, precision strikes on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure have become a strategic campaign to erode civilian resilience and force Kyiv to redirect scarce wartime resources from defense to emergency repairs. The event framing highlights compounding evidence: prolonged electricity shortages (in some areas down to a few hours per day), winter-time disruption of heating and water, economic losses from repeated infrastructure damage, and heightened humanitarian risk including potential new displacement flows into Europe. It also emphasizes that the pressure is systemic rather than episodic, with damage now threatening continuity of essential urban services and social stability. Policy implications are to pair immediate humanitarian and grid-repair support with longer-term protection measures and faster deployment of decentralized energy systems, while coordinating state, local, and civil-society resilience efforts with sustained partner backing.
-
205.
Chatham House argues that global trade should be treated as a policy lever for water security, not just a source of pressure on freshwater systems. The event rationale points to recent drought-linked disruptions, including higher prices for grains, olive oil, and chocolate and constraints on major shipping routes such as the Panama Canal and Rhine River, as evidence that water risk is already material to economies. It reasons that climate warming and volatility will intensify these risks across water-intensive supply chains unless water is valued as a shared transboundary resource. Strategically, it implies governments, firms, and investors should coordinate importer-exporter standards for fair water footprints, embed water risk in investment decisions, and pursue governance reforms that expand clean-water access and ecosystem restoration.
-
206.
Chatham House argues that accountability mechanisms must rapidly adapt because cyber operations are now being used to facilitate core international crimes, not just conventional cybercrime. The event highlights the International Criminal Court prosecutor’s new policy on cyber-enabled crimes under the Rome Statute as a key signal that cyber-enabled atrocities should be investigated and prosecuted on equal footing with offline conduct. Its reasoning centers on clarifying which cyber acts meet international criminal law thresholds, building workable legal frameworks, and addressing practical barriers to attribution, evidence collection, and prosecution. Strategically, states and international institutions should align domestic and international legal tools, strengthen investigative cooperation, and prioritize capacity for cyber-forensics and cross-border accountability.
-
207.
Chatham House argues that Haiti is entering a decisive security and governance transition, and that restoring order now requires a credible, integrated strategy rather than another narrow short-term intervention. The event framing points to entrenched gang violence, political uncertainty around the Transitional Presidential Council’s post-7 February transition, and worsening economic distress as mutually reinforcing drivers of instability. Its reasoning emphasizes lessons from past multilateral missions and the need to align Haitian institutions, regional actors, and international partners around a practical roadmap that links security operations with economic recovery and job creation. Strategically, the implication is that external support should shift toward sustained, Haitian-led institution building with clearer coordination, accountability, and economic stabilization goals if durable security is to be achieved.
-
208.
Chatham House argues that Europe’s far-right parties are reframing themselves as pragmatic “realists” and are no longer fringe actors, with growing influence over mainstream policy agendas. The discussion highlights how their electoral rise is already shifting debates on migration, sovereignty, climate policy, and the EU’s strategic direction, even before full control of government. It reasons that if multiple major European states were governed by populists at once, the core uncertainty is whether they would moderate in office or intensify nationalist positions. The policy implication is that European governments and institutions should prepare for stress on cohesion, including weaker alignment on Ukraine and climate, more difficult UK-EU coordination, and stronger need for organized democratic counter-mobilization.
-
209.
Chatham House argues that a second Trump presidency signals a shift from US hegemony to a more openly imperial foreign policy built on coercive leverage rather than alliance stewardship. It cites transactional diplomacy, disregard for international norms, threats toward allies such as Denmark over Greenland, and the operation to capture Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro as evidence of greater willingness to use force in support of a hemispheric dominance strategy. The analysis says this approach weakens NATO cohesion and broader European security assumptions while creating a more volatile environment in which states inside and outside Washington’s preferred orbit must recalibrate. It also concludes that Russia and China face a mix of risk and opportunity as US policy becomes more confrontational, producing a brittle order with higher miscalculation risk.
-
210.
The event argues that worsening humanitarian crises are being driven less by isolated emergencies and more by a structural geopolitical shift from a rules-based order to transactional power politics. Drawing on the IRC’s 2026 Emergency Watchlist, it highlights severe stress signals: rising conflict, extreme food insecurity, and mass displacement alongside declining aid and weakening international cooperation. A key indicator is concentration of risk, with 20 Watchlist countries accounting for 84% of global humanitarian need despite representing only 12% of the world’s population, increasing spillover pressures beyond their borders. The policy implication is that governments and donors should pair near-term protection of vulnerable communities with reforms that build a more resilient, sustainable humanitarian system under conditions of persistent great-power competition.
-
211.
The panel argues that digital public infrastructure (DPI) is now core state infrastructure, and the key policy question is governance: whether identity, payments, and data-sharing rails are built in the public interest rather than left to fragmented or purely private control. Speakers cite international evidence that open and interoperable approaches can scale quickly and cheaply, including India’s Aadhaar/UPI, Brazil’s Pix, Estonia/X-Road adoption elsewhere, and reported cost and inclusion gains from open-source deployments in countries like the Philippines and Rwanda. They contend the UK’s main constraints are not just funding but weak political leadership, low-trust rollout choices (especially around digital ID framing), rigid Treasury/procurement models, and limited iterative delivery capacity. The strategic implication is to pursue small, high-value pilots that build trust, then scale through clear political ownership, procurement reform, open standards, and multi-stakeholder governance to balance sovereignty, resilience, and innovation.
-
212.
The panel argues that China under Xi is pursuing a long-term effort to reshape international order around sovereignty, regime security, and reduced Western dominance, while avoiding costly ideological bloc politics. Speakers cite evidence including Beijing’s security-first governance model, parallel institution-building (e.g., BRI, AIIB, SCO, BRICS-adjacent platforms), efforts to de-risk supply chains and build economic leverage, and selective mediation diplomacy aimed especially at the Global South. They also emphasize tensions in China’s approach: it promotes an alternative governance narrative but still works inside existing institutions, and its global ambitions are constrained by domestic economic pressures and external pushback. For policymakers, the implication is to treat China’s strategy as structural and adaptive rather than episodic, requiring coordinated responses on economic resilience, technology dependence, and coalition-based diplomacy rather than issue-by-issue reactions.
-
213.
The panel’s core judgment is that MENA is showing “stabilization in name only”: open wars are partly contained, but underlying drivers of conflict are intensifying. Speakers pointed to converging internal and external pressure on Iran, a Gaza ceasefire that is effectively fragile and incomplete, renewed Saudi-UAE competition (including in Yemen), and Syria’s unsettled political order with Turkey-Israel rivalry layered on top. They also argued that a fragmented global system is producing multi-alignment rather than clear blocs, with licit and illicit financial networks blurring traditional binaries and complicating sanctions and governance. The strategic implication is that regional and Western policymakers should move beyond ad hoc conflict management toward coordinated, multi-actor political processes, while preparing for cross-border spillovers (security, migration, and economic disruption) if current flashpoints reignite.
-
214.
Chatham House argues that the late-2025 protest wave in Iran is more structurally consequential than episodic unrest because economic collapse has fused with broader political grievances and demands for systemic change. The event framing highlights sustained nationwide mobilization despite repression, internet blackouts, and security crackdowns, suggesting deeper legitimacy erosion rather than short-term discontent. It also points to protest demographics and persistence as key indicators that the Islamic Republic’s coercive tools may restore control only temporarily. For policymakers, this implies planning for prolonged instability in Iran, calibrating external pressure and messaging carefully, and assessing second-order regional effects involving US and Israeli strategy.
-
215.
The discussion argues that 2026 conflict risk will be shaped less by traditional multilateral conflict management and more by sphere-of-influence politics and transactional dealmaking by major powers. Ero’s reasoning is that with over 60 active conflicts, institutions like the UN and established mediators are increasingly sidelined, while regional and great-power actors (e.g., the US in Latin America, Gulf states in Sudan, Turkey in Syria, China in Myanmar) now carry more leverage over war and peace outcomes. She stresses that many current “peace” efforts are short-term truces rather than durable settlements, with places like Gaza, Sudan, and Somalia exposed to continued violence due to proxy competition, weak governance arrangements, and miscalculation risks among powerful states. For policy strategy, the implication is to prioritize pragmatic coalition-building with the actors who actually hold leverage, convert ceasefires into longer political processes, and adapt conflict-prevention tools to a more fragmented, law-weaker international order.
-
216.Venezuela, oil and order: What now for regional security after the US seizes Maduro? (Chatham House)
The panel argues that the U.S. seizure of Maduro marks a broader shift to explicit hemispheric power politics, where Washington is willing to use force based on narrowly defined national interests rather than traditional multilateral norms. Speakers contend that while the operation was tactically successful, it does not resolve Venezuela’s underlying governance, corruption, and institutional collapse, making durable stabilization and democratic transition highly uncertain. They also stress that the oil rationale is weak: Venezuela’s heavy crude, degraded infrastructure, legal uncertainty, and soft global demand make rapid production recovery costly and commercially unattractive, while disruption to China is likely limited. Strategically, the event signals a more fragmented Latin America, pressures partners into pragmatic bilateral bargaining with the U.S., and suggests policymakers should prioritize scenario planning for follow-on interventions, institutional reconstruction pathways, and tighter coordination among non-U.S. actors to preserve regional sovereignty and stability.
-
217.
Maddox argues that the international system has shifted into destabilizing US-China superpower rivalry, with both powers undermining global peace and prosperity in different ways. She contends that Washington’s transactional unilateralism under Trump and Beijing’s coercive techno-industrial expansion have together weakened alliances, eroded legal norms, and increased risks of conflict, including over Taiwan and transatlantic security. The lecture supports this with examples including tariff coercion, pressure over critical minerals, intensified military signaling, and challenges to institutions such as NATO, the UN system, and global trade mechanisms. Strategically, she calls on non-superpower states to strengthen and build institutions, resolve regional conflicts through principled coalitions, and actively uphold international law to preserve a rules-based order without relying on US leadership.
-
218.Yemen’s conflict: The Islah Party's evolving role, and vision for a post-war society (Chatham House)
Chatham House frames Yemen’s Islah Party as a durable, central political actor whose influence has persisted through the civil war and will likely matter in any post-war settlement. The event description highlights Islah’s institutional weight—one of Yemen’s largest parties, the second-largest parliamentary bloc, and a participant in the internationally recognized government—as evidence that it remains embedded in formal politics despite conflict fragmentation. It argues that understanding Islah’s ties with regional and international actors is essential to assessing its strategy, bargaining power, and approach to state restructuring. For policymakers, the implication is that viable peace and governance planning should treat Islah as a necessary stakeholder, while testing whether its stated vision can support an inclusive and sustainable political order.
-
219.China’s Struggle for Influence in Central Asia. How is Beijing aiming to reshape the region? (Chatham House)
Chatham House argues that China’s expansion in Central Asia is not a linear success story but a contested process shaped by local resistance and regional power politics. The event framing points to grassroots protests, elite pushback, and Beijing’s need to adjust its economic and security approach, while Central Asian states actively hedge between China, Russia, the United States, the EU, and Turkey. It also highlights potential friction around China’s growing security role and asks whether renewed U.S. attention can translate into durable influence. For policymakers, the core implication is that strategy in Central Asia must account for local agency and competitive balancing dynamics, rather than assuming Beijing can unilaterally remake the region.
-
220.
The panel’s core finding is that the UK can afford warfighting only if it makes earlier, harder political choices on defence spending and reform, because current plans are too slow for the threat timeline. Speakers argued that moving from roughly 2.3% to 3.5% of GDP requires major trade-offs (higher taxes, cuts elsewhere, or more borrowing) and that past procurement failures have weakened confidence that spending converts into usable capability. They stressed that modern conflict would hit the UK homeland through cyber, disinformation, and infrastructure disruption as well as missiles and drones, while reduced US support raises the burden on Europe. Strategically, the UK should accelerate readiness, improve procurement accountability and industrial surge capacity, rebuild stockpiles, and run a more honest national debate on resilience, mobilisation, and societal preparedness.
-
221.
Chatham House argues that Ukraine’s latest high-level corruption scandal is not only a governance crisis but a direct wartime vulnerability because it can erode domestic legitimacy and external financial support. The case centers on NABU’s alleged exposure of a graft scheme at state-owned Energoatom with potential losses of about $100 million, followed by sanctions steps, ministerial resignations, and allegations involving figures close to President Zelenskyy. The reasoning is that with Ukraine needing roughly $60 billion in external financing in 2026–2027, donor confidence depends on credible enforcement, not just exposure of wrongdoing. Strategically, the brief implies Kyiv and partners should prioritize prosecutorial follow-through, judicial independence, tighter anti-illicit-finance controls, and coordinated messaging to limit Kremlin exploitation of corruption narratives.
-
222.A new multilateralism. How are the UN and other global organizations adapting to a new world? (Chatham House)
The event’s core argument is that multilateral institutions, especially the UN system, must be structurally and politically updated to stay effective in a world shaped by great-power rivalry, fragmented governance, and fast technological and economic change. Its reasoning is that the current system is losing legitimacy and delivery capacity on cross-border problems such as climate and trade, while competing global orders are creating parallel venues for influence. The discussion points to practical adaptation priorities: reforming institutional representation, rebalancing decision-making power, and ensuring trade, technology, and development rules are perceived as fair across advanced and developing economies. For policymakers, the strategic implication is to treat multilateral reform as a competitiveness and stability agenda, investing in more inclusive, flexible institutions that can still coordinate collective action under geopolitical strain.
-
223.
Chatham House frames Trump’s Belarus policy as a sharp departure from the West’s prior strategy of non-recognition and sanctions against Lukashenka. The immediate evidence is Washington’s lifting of sanctions on Belavia after the September release of Belarusian political prisoners, alongside public statements from Trump and Lukashenka about negotiating a larger deal. The article’s core reasoning is that this transactional approach may generate short-term leverage (for example, prisoner releases) but could undercut coordinated Western pressure on the regime. Strategically, it implies a tradeoff between tactical engagement and alliance cohesion, with potential spillover for Russia-containment policy and Belarus’s role in Russia’s war against Ukraine.
-
224.
The event frames COP30 as a pivotal moment to evaluate whether international climate cooperation can sustain momentum amid shifting geopolitical leadership. Kerry’s core argument is that progress still depends on major economies aligning policy, finance, and implementation, informed by lessons from Rio, Paris, and more recent COP breakthroughs in Glasgow and Dubai. The reasoning emphasizes that even if federal commitment fluctuates, US private-sector investment and subnational actors can continue to drive meaningful emissions and transition outcomes. Strategically, this suggests governments and institutions should broaden climate diplomacy beyond national executives by building coalitions that include cities, states, and business to preserve continuity and accelerate delivery.
-
225.
The event frames Mike Pence’s central argument as a call for principled U.S. global leadership, based on his experience in the administration and focused on America’s evolving international role. Its reasoning centers on three linked policy questions: how Washington sustains alliances, manages emerging security threats, and reconciles domestic political priorities with external commitments. Chatham House positions the discussion as an on-the-record public forum to surface diverse perspectives on these strategic trade-offs. For policymakers, the implication is that U.S. strategy will hinge on whether leaders can maintain credible alliance commitments while adapting to new security pressures without losing domestic support.
-
226.
The Chatham House panel argued that shrinking Western aid budgets are no longer just a development issue but a strategic security risk for the UK and its partners. Speakers cited sharp cuts across major donors, disruption from the 2025 USAID retrenchment, and operational impacts such as HALO Trust potentially shrinking from 12,000 to 7,000 staff, warning this will hit fragile and conflict-affected states hardest. They reasoned that reduced support for conflict prevention, multilateral institutions, and long-term partnerships creates space for rival influence, increases instability and migration pressures, and weakens UK diplomatic leverage. For UK strategy, the discussion pointed to prioritizing conflict-focused aid, preserving credible multilateral engagement while using targeted bilateral strengths, rebuilding a clear long-term narrative linking aid to domestic security, and mobilizing non-traditional and private financing to offset fiscal constraints.
-
227.
Syria’s foreign minister argued that the post-Assad government is pursuing a pragmatic foreign policy centered on international reintegration, regional de-escalation, and reconstruction through investment rather than ideological confrontation. He cited high-level outreach to Washington and London, partial sanctions relief, embassy reactivation, and active diplomacy on files such as chemical weapons, refugee return, and security arrangements with Israel (including reviving the 1974 disengagement framework) as evidence of progress. He also framed internal stabilization efforts, including dialogue with the SDF and investigative mechanisms for sectarian violence, as prerequisites for restoring trust and attracting capital. The strategic implication is that external partners have an opening to shape Syria’s trajectory by pairing economic and diplomatic engagement with clear expectations on inclusivity, accountability, and institutional consolidation to reduce risks of renewed fragmentation and proxy competition.
-
228.
Chatham House’s Africa Programme argues that independent, politically focused analysis of individual African states is essential for better international decision-making and conflict prevention. It supports this claim by emphasizing its convening role with senior officials and experts, its non-commercial independence from political-risk consultancies, and its work to improve the quality of information used by policymakers and investors. The programme also links long-term investment success to transparency, accountability, and rule of law, while encouraging non-confrontational reform by governments and businesses. Strategically, the message is that governments and corporations should back nuanced country-level political analysis and governance-focused engagement to manage risk, support stability, and capture future growth opportunities as African states gain global influence.
-
229.
Chatham House’s Asia-Pacific Programme positions itself as an interdisciplinary policy platform providing objective analysis on major issues across South Asia, Southeast Asia, East Asia, and the Pacific. Its core approach combines independent research, regional partnerships, and direct engagement with decision-makers to shape practical and constructive policy outcomes. The programme supports its analysis through expert roundtables, webinars, conferences, and publications, while also advising private-sector and multilateral stakeholders. Strategically, this model implies that effective policy toward Asia-Pacific dynamics requires cross-sector evidence, sustained regional collaboration, and proactive dialogue between analysts and policymakers.
-
230.
Chatham House’s Environment and Society Centre argues that environmental challenges are systemic drivers of both global geopolitics and local societal risk, requiring integrated policy responses. Its reasoning is based on independent, multidisciplinary research that links climate change and resource depletion to security, economic, and community resilience outcomes, while convening cross-sector expertise to test policy-relevant ideas. The centre prioritizes three action areas: climate and energy transition, sustainable food/land/resource systems, and financing accelerated sustainability transitions. Through its Sustainability Accelerator, it also promotes experimental, innovation-oriented policymaking to move beyond incremental change. For policymakers and strategists, the implication is to adopt cross-sector, evidence-based, and finance-backed transition strategies that pair mitigation with adaptation and resilience-building.
-
231.
Chatham House’s Europe Programme argues that Europe needs practical, implementation-focused policy work to navigate a period of geopolitical and political disruption. Its reasoning is that combining EU, NATO, and country-level expertise can turn broad strategic goals into actionable recommendations, especially across its 2024–2027 priorities: the EU’s future, European security, and Europe’s global role. The programme also treats election outcomes and growing political fragmentation as cross-cutting forces that shape progress in all three areas. For policymakers, the implication is to pursue integrated strategies that link institutional reform, security planning, and external action while stress-testing decisions against domestic political volatility across Europe.
-
232.
Chatham House’s Global Economy and Finance Programme argues that independent, policy-oriented analysis can improve international economic decision-making when it is tightly connected to real-world policymakers and practitioners. Its reasoning rests on a three-part operating model: original research on emerging global finance issues, convening expert dialogues across academia, government, and business, and running private briefings for senior decision-makers. The programme’s topic coverage, from G7/G20 governance and trade to debt, climate economics, and monetary system reform, indicates a systems-level approach to interconnected global risks. Strategically, this implies policymakers should prioritize cross-border coordination, use evidence-led forums to build consensus, and translate technical analysis into actionable policy pathways quickly.
-
233.
Chatham House argues that the post-1945 international order is under growing strain from renewed interstate aggression, coercive diplomacy, and great-power competition over future global rules. It reasons that credibility gaps—such as perceived Western double standards on Ukraine and Gaza—and a more transactional US foreign policy are accelerating institutional fragmentation. The centre’s approach is to identify which legacy norms can be preserved, where new rules are needed, and how to give greater weight to smaller states, aspiring middle powers, and Global South voices across security, law, digital, and health domains. For policymakers, the implication is that effective strategy now requires pragmatic institutional reform and broader coalition-building, rather than reliance on legacy governance frameworks alone.
-
234.
Chatham House’s Middle East and North Africa Programme argues that better policy on the region requires grounded, field-based analysis of often overlooked drivers of conflict, governance stress, and state–society change. It supports this approach through a research model combining field data collection, bilingual policy publications, convening with decision-makers across sectors, and direct briefings in MENA, the UK, and the US. The programme’s focus on geopolitical competition, transnational conflict dynamics, political-economic networks, and accountability is presented as the analytical basis for more realistic policy choices. For strategy, the implication is that governments and institutions should rely on locally informed, cross-regional, and cross-sector evidence to design interventions and partnerships that are politically feasible and context-specific.
-
235.
Chatham House presents its Russia and Eurasia Programme as a policy-impact platform focused on delivering rigorous analysis of Russia, Ukraine, and other post-Soviet states whose trajectories have sharply diverged. The core argument is that Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has fundamentally reshaped regional security and politics, making sovereignty and independence the essential analytical starting point for all countries in scope. Its reasoning is grounded in sustained research output, expert convenings, media engagement, and partnerships with academic and policy institutions to test and disseminate findings on war dynamics, domestic political change, and regional geopolitics. For policymakers and strategists, the implication is a need for differentiated country-specific approaches, long-term support for Ukrainian resilience and reconstruction, and continuous reassessment of Russia’s internal and external trajectory in a volatile regional environment.
-
236.
Chatham House’s UK in the World Programme argues that the UK must rethink foreign policy for a more multipolar and less predictable environment, as its traditional relationships with the US and Europe evolve and new actors gain influence. It reasons that the UK can still act effectively as an influential mid-sized power and global broker, but only if external strategy is linked to domestic renewal on growth, regional inequality, and public service capacity. The programme supports this through expert working groups, policy analysis on trade-offs, and public engagement focused on economic security, development, strategic partnerships, and science and technology. The strategic implication is that UK policymakers should pursue a more integrated domestic-foreign policy approach, prioritizing resilient partnerships, economic security, and innovation-led statecraft.
-
237.
Chatham House’s US and North America Programme argues that understanding policy shifts in Washington and Ottawa is essential to navigating wider global realignment. Its reasoning is based on a mix of policy-focused research, expert analysis, and cross-sector convenings that track how North American decisions shape geopolitical, security, and economic outcomes. The programme emphasizes durable structural trends rather than only short-term political cycles, including US-China strategy, trade-policy renegotiation, and evolving alliance structures. For policymakers and strategists in the UK, Europe, and other middle powers, the implication is to prepare for sustained changes in US external behavior through diversified partnerships, adaptive economic strategy, and long-horizon security planning beyond 2028.
-
238.Haiti’s vicious circle: Funding is needed to end the violence. But the violence means the funding doesn’t come (Chatham House)
Haiti is trapped in a vicious circle where escalating gang violence and political infighting within the Transitional Presidential Council (TPC) deter the international funding and legitimacy required to restore order. With 90% of Port-au-Prince under criminal control and 8,100 deaths in 2025, the lack of a stable government counterpart severely undermines the UN’s Gang Suppression Force and the feasibility of democratic elections. Consequently, systemic security sector reform and economic recovery remain unachievable without a significant reversal in declining global development assistance.
-
239.
The panel argues that while central bank independence (CBI) is increasingly challenged by high public debt and political populism, it remains essential for anchoring inflation expectations and maintaining price stability. Experts highlight that 'fiscal dominance' in high-debt environments increases political pressure to lower interest rates, particularly in the US, risking a return to 1970s-style inflation volatility. To maintain legitimacy, central banks must improve transparency and adapt to a new era of frequent supply shocks—such as AI and geopolitical shifts—which may drive higher neutral interest rates globally. Consequently, failure to safeguard CBI could lead to financial repression and a fragmentation of the global monetary regime.
-
240.
The global health architecture is shifting from multilateral cooperation toward transactional bilateralism, characterized by new strategies that tie health aid to commercial interests and strategic resource access. In response, Africa is pursuing 'health sovereignty' by prioritizing regional manufacturing, unified procurement mechanisms, and internal reforms to eliminate systemic inefficiencies and aid dependency. This transition signals a move away from traditional grant-based assistance toward a model of 'commercial diplomacy,' requiring recipient nations to leverage collective bargaining and domestic financing to maintain policy agency.
-
241.
Heritage argues that downsizing or closing the U.S. Department of Education would reduce compliance burdens and shift authority to states and localities, enabling more parent- and school-level decision-making. It cites past estimates of large federal administrative costs and contends that federal K-12 funding is a relatively small share of total spending, while student outcomes have remained weak under the current model. The report recommends converting Title I and IDEA into more flexible block grants or student-level micro-ESAs, expanding Ed-Flex waivers, increasing state-led transparency and assessment reforms, and tightening state civil-rights and DEI-related rules. Strategically, it implies states should stand up transition working groups, audit federal fund use, coordinate multistate legal and regulatory action, and prepare for interagency federal program handoffs as Washington’s education role contracts.
-
242.
The Heritage commentary argues that declining marriage and fertility rates pose a core national risk, citing a Congressional Budget Office projection that the U.S. population would begin shrinking by 2030 without immigration. It contends that family breakdown, not just economics, is driving long-term demographic and social decline, and that married two-parent households outperform alternatives across social and economic outcomes. The piece advocates a pro-family policy agenda including removing marriage penalties in welfare, expanding tax credits for married families, and using public recognition to reinforce marital stability. Strategically, it calls conservatives to prioritize family formation as a central domestic policy objective and rejects reliance on mass immigration as the primary demographic solution.
-
243.
The report argues that America’s long-term decline in marriage and fertility is a civilizational threat and that restoring stable married-parent families is essential to national renewal. It cites historical trends and social-science findings linking two-parent married households with better child outcomes, lower poverty and crime, and stronger economic and civic performance, while blaming welfare marriage penalties, cultural shifts, and institutional incentives for family breakdown. Strategically, it recommends a whole-of-government pro-family agenda: remove welfare and tax marriage penalties, strengthen work requirements, reduce regulatory and housing barriers, expand religion- and family-supportive policies, and create new marriage-centered incentives (FAM/HCE credits and NEST accounts). The implication is a shift from neutral or symptom-management policy toward explicit state preference for marriage and child-rearing within intact families as a national policy objective.
-
244.
The paper argues that South Korea is becoming a major defence exporter, especially as European states accelerate rearmament and seek reliable suppliers beyond traditional sources. It attributes Seoul’s rise to a combination of scalable industrial capacity, relatively fast delivery timelines, competitive pricing, and growing political-strategic alignment with European security priorities. The analysis also highlights constraints, including production bottlenecks, technology-transfer sensitivities, sustainment demands, and the need to balance exports with South Korea’s own military readiness and regional risks. Strategically, it suggests Europe–South Korea cooperation should move from one-off procurement to longer-term partnerships in co-production, interoperability, and supply-chain resilience.
-
245.
The paper argues that maritime deterrence in the Straits of Malacca and Singapore is highly localized: security infrastructure reduces risk only in small, place-specific zones, while low-level piracy and armed robbery persist in nearby choke points. Using ReCAAP incident data from 2007 to August 2025, the authors show crime is strongly clustered rather than random, with hotspots concentrated within roughly 50 nautical miles of security infrastructure and much weaker clustering beyond 200 nautical miles. The study reasons that this pattern reflects geography and offender adaptation to predictable patrols, not simple enforcement failure, as criminals shift routes, timing, and tactics around fixed monitoring systems. Policy implication: states should treat SOMS maritime crime as a continuous risk-management problem by reducing surveillance blind spots, increasing patrol unpredictability and operational flexibility, and better synchronizing local enforcement with regional coordination mechanisms.
-
246.Lawless Seas Contested Shores Piracy Smuggling And The Scramble For Port Access In The Horn Of Africa (IISS)
IISS argues that maritime insecurity in the Horn of Africa is being reshaped by Somalia’s unresolved state fragility, producing a renewed mix of piracy, arms-smuggling, and strategic competition over ports and bases. The report links piracy’s resurgence since late 2023 to reduced international naval pressure, relaxed commercial risk controls, and regional diversion caused by Red Sea attacks, while also documenting cross-Gulf arms networks that move munitions and dual-use components between Yemen and the Horn. It finds that although external powers are increasingly active, many port and basing ambitions remain tentative, with outcomes still heavily mediated by local actors and domestic Somali/Somaliland politics. For policy, the implication is to pair maritime deterrence with sustained land-side governance and counter-smuggling efforts, while managing great-power and Gulf rivalries through long-horizon diplomacy that accounts for rapid political shifts such as Somaliland recognition and Somalia’s cancellation of UAE agreements.
-
247.Cloud Adoption For National Security And Defence Purposes Four Case Studies From The Asia Pacific (IISS)
The IISS paper argues that cloud computing is becoming essential for national-security and defence functions in the Asia-Pacific, and that states can combine commercial cloud benefits with sovereign control. Using case studies of Japan, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand, it shows each country adopting hybrid or phased models to handle growing data demands, improve military interoperability, and strengthen decision-making under complex cyber and geopolitical pressure. The analysis highlights that reliance on dominant hyperscalers, especially US providers, creates governance and control trade-offs that governments are managing through tailored technical, legal, and institutional safeguards. Strategically, the paper implies that effective NS&D cloud policy should prioritize secure hybrid architectures, domestic governance capacity, and clear sovereignty mechanisms rather than seeking full digital isolation.
-
248.
IISS argues that the EU is becoming a much stronger regulator and financier of Europe’s defence market, even though NATO remains the main provider of military security. It points to a sharp rise in EU-level defence funding and instruments—from virtually no dedicated budget before 2014 to major 2021–27 allocations, a proposed 2028–34 expansion, and the €150bn SAFE mechanism adopted in 2025—along with stricter rules limiting non-EU participation. The paper also notes a countervailing trend: rapidly growing national defence budgets across Europe are likely to exceed EU funds, allowing member states to bypass some Commission frameworks. Strategically, third countries should expect reduced access in EU-governed segments but may still compete in nationally controlled procurement, while closer partners could secure selective, transactional access by aligning with EU industrial and political priorities.
-
249.Exploring Opportunities For European Rearmament Through Ukraines Experience And Indo Pacific Partnerships (IISS)
The paper argues that Ukraine’s wartime defense-industrial adaptation offers a practical model for European rearmament under prolonged high-intensity conflict conditions. It attributes Ukraine’s resilience to three factors: restructuring domestic defense production, rapidly diversifying and hardening supply chains, and building flexible external industrial partnerships beyond Europe. The analysis highlights the growing strategic relevance of Indo-Pacific actors such as South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan for technology and components, while noting that dependence on China remains both operationally important and geopolitically risky. For European strategy, the report implies that rearmament planning should prioritize industrial agility, supplier diversification, and broader cross-regional defense partnerships to strengthen long-term resilience.
-
250.
IISS argues that the EU’s SAFE instrument, while framed as opening some space for third-country participation, will in practice constrain non-EU defence suppliers more than many expect. The paper points to strict eligibility rules—especially the 35% non-EU component cap, EU-centered design-authority requirements, and tight 2030 delivery timelines—as major barriers, with full design-authority transfer seen as particularly unrealistic for many partners. It also cites uneven and politically difficult “enhanced terms” negotiations (e.g., late Canada agreement, UK obstacles, and no invitations for South Korea and Turkiye) as evidence that access is limited in practice. Strategically, these constraints could reduce EU access to allied technologies, weaken interoperability and joint development partnerships, and slow capability innovation in EU-funded procurement.
-
251.
The paper argues that the Philippines’ shift to a Comprehensive Archipelagic Defense Concept (CADC) marks a major strategic move from broad modernization toward a geography-centered military posture focused on dispersed basing, longer-range strike, and denial operations. It reasons that worsening threat perceptions of China, especially in maritime border areas and near Taiwan, are driving this transition, but also increasing risks of sharper confrontation and security-dilemma dynamics. The analysis highlights practical constraints, including inter-service rivalry, political vulnerability to Chinese influence operations, and policy ambiguity over foreign basing access, weapons deployments, and partner force integration. Strategically, it suggests Manila should codify clearer baseline defense policies, integrate alliances more explicitly, and refine CADC’s theory of victory so deterrence objectives translate into concrete theater-level outcomes rather than capability acquisition alone.
-
252.
The paper argues that a growing number of European NATO members are rapidly pursuing deep precision strike (DPS) capabilities to address a worsening security environment and the post-INF gap in long-range conventional strike options. It finds broad strategic alignment among ELSA partners on deterrence and war-fighting utility, but highlights major national differences in doctrine, industrial capacity, technological baseline, and motivations—illustrated by France and the UK’s dual deterrence/war-fighting framing versus Germany and Poland’s stronger deterrence-by-punishment focus on Russia. Evidence centers on planned expansion from legacy air-launched systems to ground- and sea-launched cruise and ballistic missiles in the 1,000–2,000+ km range, alongside identified enablers such as ISR and kill-chain integration. Strategically, the paper suggests Europe faces difficult policy trade-offs over budgets, force mix, industrial autonomy versus urgent procurement, and unresolved risks around MTCR constraints, Russian reactions, and regional nuclear stability.
-
253.
The paper argues that Syria’s post-Assad transition hinges on whether fragmented armed factions can be integrated into a credible national security architecture, and that the HTS-led interim authorities’ current approach is producing serious risks. It supports this by tracing the rapid collapse of the Assad regime in late 2024, HTS’s consolidation of control in early 2025, and subsequent violence on the coast and sectarian clashes in the south that expose weaknesses in force integration and command legitimacy. The report also maps the major armed actors (HTS, SDF, SNA, NLF, Islamic State, and regime remnants) and shows how their differing ideologies, structures, and funding streams complicate unification. Strategically, it implies that policymakers should prioritize inclusive, sequenced security-sector reform with external coordination, because narrow, faction-dominated integration is likely to fuel renewed instability and regional contestation.
-
254.
INSS argues that current U.S. force posture in CENTCOM reflects a pre-crisis phase combining coercive diplomacy with credible military readiness against Iran, while trying to avoid a long war. It cites roughly 40,000 U.S. personnel, a carrier strike group near Oman, multiple destroyers, expanded strike and ISR assets, reinforced missile defenses, and elevated airlift as evidence of preparations beyond symbolic signaling. The analysis also contends Iran is under heavy internal and external pressure but remains regime-stable, making diplomacy appear tactical and time-buying rather than genuinely de-escalatory. Strategically, this posture may strengthen deterrence and bargaining leverage, but it also raises the risk of miscalculation and rapid escalation among the U.S., Iran, and Israel.
-
255.
INSS argues that Saudi–UAE ties have shifted from tactical coordination to a structural strategic rivalry over regional leadership, influence, and economic primacy. It cites widening divergence across conflict theaters (Yemen, Sudan, and Qatar diplomacy), competing regional alignments, and escalating economic competition tied to Saudi Vision 2030 and efforts to challenge Dubai’s hub status. The analysis contends this is not a temporary leadership dispute but part of a broader regional reordering, with implications for Gulf cohesion, Red Sea dynamics, and external actors’ planning assumptions. For policymakers, the key takeaway is to avoid treating a Saudi–Emirati bloc as fixed, hedge against further fragmentation, and for Israel in particular avoid appearing to choose sides while preserving channels to both Riyadh and Abu Dhabi.
-
256.
INSS argues that Israel can economically absorb a gradual reduction in direct U.S. military aid, but the strategic and political value of the aid framework remains significant. It notes that aid now equals only about 0.5% of Israel’s GDP yet still funds roughly 15% of the defense budget, while stricter aid terms increasingly route spending to U.S. procurement and reduce direct support for Israeli industry. The paper also stresses that aid functions as a strategic anchor for U.S.-Israel ties and access to advanced U.S. systems, even as bipartisan support in the United States has weakened and aid has become more politically contested. It recommends replacing the current model with a formal transition toward defense-industrial partnership, avoiding full dollar-for-dollar budget replacement, and using the shift to drive efficiency, prioritization, and domestic capability building.
-
257.
The INSS argues that subsea data centers could become a strategic infrastructure option for Israel by addressing AI-era pressures on electricity, freshwater, and land while strengthening digital sovereignty. It cites evidence from Microsoft’s Project Natick and Chinese deployments showing major gains in cooling efficiency, reduced freshwater use, lower land footprint, and improved hardware reliability in sealed underwater environments. The paper also stresses that these benefits are offset by unresolved environmental effects, difficult maintenance logistics, heightened sabotage/espionage risks to subsea assets, and legal-regulatory gaps under current maritime law. Strategically, it recommends that Israel proactively assess pilot adoption, integrate planning with existing offshore energy/communications infrastructure, and develop dedicated regulation, environmental monitoring, and maritime protection doctrines in coordination with regional partners.
-
258.De-Hamasification of the Gaza Strip: Learning from Western and Arab Models of Deradicalization (INSS)
The memorandum argues that rebuilding Gaza after the October 7 war requires more than disarmament and infrastructure repair; it requires a deliberate "de-Hamasification" process to dismantle Hamas’s ideological and institutional dominance. INSS contends that Western deradicalization templates (e.g., postwar Germany and Japan) are poorly suited to Gaza’s current social and political conditions, and instead highlights contemporary Arab "civic-transformative" models as more applicable. Its reasoning emphasizes a combined approach: sustained security demilitarization, Arab-led religious and political legitimization, re-education toward tolerance, and economic rehabilitation tied to a credible political horizon. Strategically, the paper implies that Israel and regional partners should pursue an integrated security-political-religious framework to build a durable post-Hamas governing alternative and reduce long-term instability.
-
259.
INSS argues that the U.S.-Iran track is in a temporary de-escalation, but absent major Iranian concessions the risk of renewed military confrontation remains high. The analysis cites deep gaps over Iran’s missile program and proxy support, Trump’s credibility pressures after a large U.S. force buildup, and Iran’s regime-survival mindset amid severe domestic unrest and repression as reasons diplomacy may stall. It also notes that Tehran may show limited flexibility on nuclear issues, especially after damage to enrichment capabilities, while refusing concessions on missiles and regional allies. Strategically, a nuclear-only deal with sanctions relief could stabilize the Iranian regime without resolving core regional security threats, leaving Israel and Gulf partners exposed and requiring continued coercive leverage alongside diplomacy.
-
260.
Turkey views the stability of the Iranian regime as a vital national security interest, prioritizing the regional status quo over potential democratic change or regime collapse. Ankara fears that upheaval in Tehran would trigger massive migration waves, disrupt critical energy supplies, and create a governance vacuum exploitable by Kurdish separatist groups like the PKK. Consequently, the Turkish government has framed domestic Iranian protests as foreign-led conspiracies, indicating that Turkey will likely prioritize regime continuity in Tehran to prevent regional instability and economic contagion.
-
261.
The INSS reports that President Trump’s 'Board of Peace' (BoP) has evolved from a specific Gaza stabilization initiative into a global conflict-resolution mechanism that bypasses the UN framework, leading to a refusal by major Western democracies to participate. This highly centralized body, controlled personally by Trump, lacks broad international legitimacy and relies on a mix of regional partners and non-democratic states. While the BoP may successfully oversee short-term operational goals in Gaza due to US and regional backing, its long-term viability is threatened by its isolation from traditional Western allies. For Israel, participation offers direct influence over Gaza's reconstruction but risks diplomatic isolation within a board composed of regional rivals.
-
262.
Following the brutal suppression of late 2025 protests, Iranian reformists have shifted from advocating gradual internal change to openly challenging the Islamic Republic's foundational legitimacy. Key leaders like Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi are now demanding national referendums on a new constitution, signaling a break from their previous commitment to the regime's core principles. While their current organizational power is weak and public trust has eroded, these figures could serve as a critical ideological bridge and moderate governing alternative during a future period of regime erosion or transition. This potential role is amplified by the lack of other viable, domestically-led opposition groups capable of managing a political shift.
-
263.A Broader Look at Dynamic Space Operations: Creating Multi-Dimensional Dilemmas for Adversaries (Mitchell)
The report argues that the United States must shift from legacy, static space operations to dynamic space operations (DSO) to preserve space superiority in an increasingly contested warfighting domain. It reasons that older architectures were designed for a benign environment, while current threats and mission demands require capabilities that can rapidly and frequently change orbital and operational parameters. According to the study, broad use of DSO would improve resilience, flexibility, and mission effectiveness by enabling maneuver, surprise, and novel mission approaches that complicate adversary planning. Strategically, the implication is that accelerating DSO adoption is urgent for deterrence and for protecting the space-enabled foundation of U.S. joint military operations.
-
264.Winning the Next War: Overcoming the U.S. Air Force’s Capacity, Capability, and Readiness Crisis (Mitchell)
The Mitchell Institute argues that the U.S. Air Force has entered a severe force-generation crisis, describing it as the oldest, smallest, and least ready in its history at a time of rising peer threats. The report’s core reasoning is that deterrence and warfighting credibility depend on balancing three linked factors: sufficient force size, modern combat capability, and day-to-day readiness, and that current shortfalls across all three create unacceptable operational risk. It recommends a dual fiscal shift: increase top-line Air Force funding and reallocate internal spending from RDT&E toward procurement and operations and maintenance to rebuild near-term combat readiness. Strategically, the paper warns that failing to act now will raise the probability of major U.S. losses in a future high-end conflict and weaken U.S. deterrence posture.