The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
China’s Struggle for Influence in Central Asia. How is Beijing aiming to reshape the region?
English Summary
Chatham House argues that China’s expansion in Central Asia is not a linear success story but a contested process shaped by local resistance and regional power politics. The event framing points to grassroots protests, elite pushback, and Beijing’s need to adjust its economic and security approach, while Central Asian states actively hedge between China, Russia, the United States, the EU, and Turkey. It also highlights potential friction around China’s growing security role and asks whether renewed U.S. attention can translate into durable influence. For policymakers, the core implication is that strategy in Central Asia must account for local agency and competitive balancing dynamics, rather than assuming Beijing can unilaterally remake the region.
中文摘要
查塔姆研究所（Chatham House）指出，中國在中亞的擴張並非一條線性成功的敘事，而是一個受在地抵制與區域權力政治共同塑造的競逐過程。該活動的分析框架顯示，基層抗議、菁英層反制，以及北京必須調整其經濟與安全策略，皆為關鍵變數；同時，中亞國家也在中國、俄羅斯、美國、歐盟與土耳其之間主動採取避險平衡。文章亦強調，中國日益擴大的安全角色可能引發摩擦，並提出美國再度關注中亞是否能轉化為持久影響力的問題。對政策制定者而言，核心意涵是：中亞戰略必須納入在地能動性與競爭性平衡動態，而非假設北京可單方面重塑該區域。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.