The article outlines how a successful modern foreign policy career requires blending traditional diplomatic expertise with private sector acumen. Juster's career trajectory—from international law to high-stakes diplomacy (e.g., the Gulf War) and subsequently to the technology sector—demonstrates this synthesis. Key evidence includes his work managing complex negotiations under duress and his involvement in co-founding the U.S.-India High Technology Group. The implication for policy is that effective geopolitical strategy must actively integrate private sector knowledge and technological considerations to manage modern economic and security challenges.
Russia
This topic hub groups ThinkTankWeekly entries tagged Russia and links readers back to the original publishers.
-
1.
-
2.
The analysis suggests that Russia's ability to sustain its war effort in Ukraine is facing increasing internal and external pressures. Key evidence points to a tightening economic crisis, evidenced by widespread blackouts and a noticeable scaling back of traditional military displays. Furthermore, the discussion highlights Putin's increasing isolation and micromanagement, suggesting that the strategic initiative may be slipping out of Moscow's control. Policymakers should monitor these signs of internal strain, as they indicate potential vulnerabilities and a possible shift in Russia's military and geopolitical calculus.
-
3.
The analysis concludes that China will hold the upper hand at the upcoming Trump-Xi summit, leveraging its dominance over critical minerals, rare earths, and magnet supply chains. This geopolitical leverage, combined with global instability (such as the Iran conflict), allows Beijing to dictate terms and buy time to consolidate its technological and industrial self-sufficiency. Strategically, the U.S. must avoid granting China a managed equilibrium by maintaining 'maximum pressure' on key sectors like AI and tech, rather than seeking broad agreements that could undermine American leadership.
-
4.
The article argues that the ongoing Iran War has triggered a severe global hunger crisis, exacerbated by U.S. aid cuts and policy neglect, pushing millions to the brink of starvation. Key evidence includes the termination of U.S. support in countries like Afghanistan, Somalia, and Yemen, coupled with supply chain disruptions and massive cost increases across the region. Policy recommendations are urgent: the U.S. must immediately deploy its $5.4 billion in unspent humanitarian funds, establish a humanitarian corridor through the Strait of Hormuz, and reinstate life-saving aid to critical nations.
-
5.
The analysis cautions that the upcoming Trump-Xi summit must not result in short-term strategic concessions for the US, which risks undermining long-term stability. China is rapidly consolidating global power, leveraging US policy shifts and increasing its assertiveness across the Indo-Pacific and in technology. Strategically, the US must prioritize addressing the immediate crisis in Iran, where China holds significant leverage, and must also focus on joint cooperation on AI. Ultimately, the US must resist political impulses and pursue a robust strategy to counter China's growing challenge to global dominance.
-
6.
The CFR argues that any US-China dialogue on AI safety must be narrowly scoped and coupled with a 'maximum pressure' campaign. Because China views AI cooperation primarily as a means to close its technological gap, the US cannot rely on Beijing's good faith and must maintain a significant technological lead. The recommended strategy is to tighten export controls to widen the US-China AI capability gap, thereby eliminating China's leverage and forcing Beijing to prioritize global AI safety. This approach preserves US leadership while creating the necessary structural conditions for long-term, enforceable safety agreements.
-
7.
The Chatham House analysis argues that 'maximum pressure' sanctions, especially those aimed at regime change, are inherently unstable and create a dangerous escalatory momentum toward military action. The evidence points to repeated failures—such as the decades-long sanctions on Cuba and the inability to topple the Venezuelan regime—demonstrating that sanctions alone are insufficient to achieve stated political goals. Consequently, the risk of military intervention is not limited to a single administration but is a systemic policy danger for any US government that implements punitive sanctions without a coherent strategy for de-escalation or negotiation. Policymakers must therefore view sanctions as a limited tool, ensuring they are paired with clear off-ramps to prevent unnecessary conflict.
-
8.
Despite rising global tensions and skepticism regarding formal arms control, the paper argues that avoiding a new nuclear arms race remains achievable. It analyzes the stability of four key nuclear relationships—including the US-Russia, US-China, and the N5 group—to assess the current risk landscape. The research provides concrete recommendations for states to manage these complex dynamics and prevent costly escalation. Ultimately, the findings emphasize that proactive diplomatic engagement is crucial to maintaining strategic stability, especially in the context of the NPT Review Conference.
-
9.
India's foreign policy is defined by 'multialignment,' a self-interested strategy of maintaining strong, non-ideological ties with multiple global powers rather than adhering to any single bloc. This strategy is evidenced by India's simultaneous deepening of partnerships with the US (e.g., defense cooperation) while maintaining independent, critical relationships with Russia and France. Consequently, India is a major proponent of a multipolar global order, advocating for greater representation in international institutions. For external powers, the implication is that attempts to force alignment will fail; instead, a nuanced approach that works with India to maximize mutual gains is necessary for effective policy engagement.
-
10.
India is strategically deepening its security cooperation with the United States and Indo-Pacific partners while rigorously maintaining its principle of strategic autonomy. Rather than joining formal, treaty-based alliances, India utilizes flexible, transactional partnerships to build material capacity and legitimacy, even while signaling concern about regional challenges like China's growing influence. This selective engagement allows New Delhi to maximize its geopolitical flexibility and avoid explicit confrontation, but it simultaneously strains relationships with partners who press for clearer alignment. Policymakers must recognize that India's foreign policy is defined by this careful balancing act, requiring sustained, nuanced diplomacy to manage its diversified ties (e.g., between the West and Russia).
-
11.
India is uniquely positioned to anchor a democratic alternative to China’s authoritarian tech model, leveraging its democratic institutions and massive market to shape global technology norms. The analysis highlights that India’s tech governance remains rooted in the rule of law and pluralistic deliberation, contrasting sharply with state-led authoritarian models. However, the article stresses that India cannot lead alone; effective progress requires coordinated efforts from like-minded democratic powers, particularly the United States, to fill the growing normative vacuum. Strategically, democratic nations must urgently coordinate to establish shared frameworks for AI and data governance, or risk ceding future economic and regulatory influence to China.
-
12.
The CFR briefing concludes that the Trump-Xi summit established a fragile, symbolic détente rather than achieving substantive structural reform. This temporary stability is largely predicated on the mutual acknowledgment of critical vulnerabilities, particularly China's control over rare earth minerals and global supply chains, which previously forced a trade truce. While the talks reduced immediate escalation risk, the underlying structural threats—including technology dependence, market access issues, and geopolitical flashpoints like Taiwan—remain unaddressed. Policymakers must therefore focus on mitigating these persistent vulnerabilities rather than relying on the diplomatic breakthroughs suggested by the summit.
-
13.
The article argues that President Trump's plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Europe is strategically beneficial, asserting that the U.S. presence acts as an unnecessary 'glue' that prevents natural European self-sufficiency. Proponents argue that Europe has fundamentally changed, possessing nuclear deterrents and the capacity for regional defense, making American military dominance obsolete. Withdrawal will incentivize European states to rapidly rearm and form natural regional blocs, thereby restoring a balance of power without requiring constant American subsidies. Furthermore, reducing U.S. bases in Europe is presented as a positive development, as it limits American power projection and potential involvement in the Middle East.
-
14.
The state visit signaled a desire for 'strategic stability' and economic cooperation, evidenced by China's agreement to purchase major U.S. goods. However, the summit highlighted deep geopolitical divergences, particularly regarding Taiwan and the Middle East (Iran). Beijing appears to be using economic engagement to buy time and forestall tariffs, while the U.S. is leveraging the relationship to manage the Iran conflict. Policymakers must anticipate continued strategic competition, as both nations will use upcoming multilateral forums, such as the G20, to manage their conflicting priorities and maintain influence.
-
15.
The Chatham House analysis argues that the upcoming Trump-Xi summit will focus on managing the US-China rivalry through transactional, short-term agreements rather than resolving deep structural competition. Both leaders are primarily constrained by domestic political pressures—Trump's election cycle and Xi's economic stability—leading them to prioritize immediate economic levers like trade purchases and technology access. While the US agenda is narrow and improvisational, China is leveraging its economic statecraft, particularly rare earth controls, to maintain an asymmetric stalemate. For policy makers, the report advises looking past immediate headlines, emphasizing that sustained data and execution on commitments, such as trade fulfillment, are more critical than the summit's stated outcomes.
-
16.
The article argues that the proposed 'Golden Dome' homeland missile defense project is fiscally unsound and strategically infeasible, citing a projected cost of $1.2 trillion that consumes a massive portion of the defense budget for limited defensive capability. It contends that such systems are unlikely to protect against advanced threats and could dangerously increase the risk of preemptive conflict. Instead of funding this costly infrastructure, policymakers should focus on pragmatic, proven methods to de-escalate tensions and deter the use of nuclear weapons, rather than attempting to 'win' a nuclear war.
-
17.
The paper argues that Nordic-Baltic states are increasing engagement with the Indo-Pacific, driven by shared security concerns heightened by the war in Ukraine. The most significant area of convergence is the shared threat of subsea cable disruptions, which both regions view as a critical hybrid security challenge. While the Nordic-Baltic states are inclined toward a NATO-like defense architecture, the paper notes a structural disconnect with the diverse, often national-level, responses in the Indo-Pacific. Consequently, future collaboration is projected to be domain-specific—focusing on technical issues like critical infrastructure protection—rather than encompassing broad regional military or diplomatic alignment.
-
18.
The article argues that Russia's recent public displays, such as the diminished Victory Day parade, reveal deep structural cracks in its power and stability. Key evidence includes the military hardware's absence, slowing economic growth, and internal security tensions exacerbated by infighting and digital crackdowns. For policy, the analysis suggests that while Russia remains a threat, its declining geopolitical influence, coupled with the strengthening and consolidating hard-power capabilities of Europe and NATO, indicates a long-term erosion of Moscow's global standing.
-
19.
The article argues that the U.S.-India partnership should shift its focus from judging each country's domestic democratic performance to jointly championing democratic norms within the global international order. While strategic convergence (especially concerning China) remains the primary driver, the U.S. must recognize that India's engagement is rooted in self-interest and multialignment, not ideology. Policy should therefore guide the U.S. to work with India's efforts to democratize global governance structures, particularly in technology and security architecture. This approach allows the U.S. to leverage India's unique position to build a democratic alternative to authoritarian models without creating bilateral friction.
-
20.
The summit did not result in major breakthroughs but rather a return to managed stability in U.S.-China relations. Key outcomes include the establishment of a 'Board of Trade' and a 'Board of Investment,' which experts view as structural continuations of previous dialogues rather than radical new commitments. The discussions focused on managing existing trade flows and extending ceasefires, allowing China to maintain its economic status quo without making significant concessions. Strategically, this suggests that the U.S. must adjust its policy away from demanding fundamental systemic changes and instead focus on managing these stable, yet limited, bilateral agreements.
-
21.
The report argues that while the EU successfully transitioned away from Russian gas, its new LNG strategy risks replacing one dependency with another, creating new concentration risks. Utilizing a dual-risk framework (price volatility, geopolitical exposure, and supplier concentration), the analysis demonstrates that reliance on a single supplier or contract type is inherently unstable. Therefore, the core policy recommendation is that the EU must adopt a resilient energy portfolio that balances diversified long-term contracts with retained spot-market flexibility. Ultimately, long-term security requires mitigating geopolitical risks and actively managing critical chokepoint vulnerabilities, rather than simply substituting one major supplier for another.
-
22.
U.S. allies are increasing diplomatic and economic ties with China, driven by growing frustration and concerns over the perceived unreliability of the United States as a security and trade partner. Key evidence includes high-level visits from European and Indo-Pacific leaders, resulting in agreements focused on diversifying trade, green energy cooperation, and AI technology. Experts caution that while these moves signal a desire to 'de-risk' and reduce reliance on the U.S., the strategy is largely symbolic and lacks coordinated substance. The primary implication is that allies are adopting an 'a la carte' hedging approach, which grants China increased time and space to build geopolitical leverage with the West.
-
23.
The U.S.-China rivalry is defined by a state of 'mutually assured disruption,' where technological competition (semiconductor controls vs. rare earth embargoes) creates an unstable equilibrium. While the U.S. maintains a lead in AI frontier model development, China holds an advantage in deployment speed and cost, suggesting rough parity. Policy efforts should focus on immediate, proactive dialogue regarding AI safety and non-proliferation, drawing parallels to Cold War treaties. Crucially, any safety negotiations must be conducted while simultaneously tightening technological loopholes to maintain strategic leverage and prevent being outmaneuvered.
-
24.
The article argues that the concept of great power spheres of influence has evolved beyond traditional military boundaries, now manifesting in functional domains like critical technology and digital infrastructure. This shift allows powerful states, such as China, to consolidate an 'open sphere' by leveraging economic and technological influence, particularly if the United States makes unilateral concessions or is strategically distracted. The author warns that the U.S.'s willingness to make policy concessions regarding Taiwan and its diminishing reliability as a security guarantor could hasten China's consolidation of influence in the Indo-Pacific. Strategically, this necessitates that Washington update its understanding of modern spheres to prevent a major geopolitical division that could escalate into conflict.
-
25.
Following a period of appeasement to the US under a volatile administration, European nations have undergone a strategic pivot toward self-reliance and collective action. This shift was catalyzed by perceived US overreach, prompting Europe to coordinate joint military exercises, activate anti-coercion tools, and establish a collective defense financing program. Economically, the EU is rapidly constructing a parallel trading system through major bilateral deals (e.g., India, Australia), reducing dependence on traditional transatlantic markets. These developments signal that Europe is building a more resilient, sovereign security and economic core, materially altering its geopolitical trajectory toward strategic autonomy.
-
26.
Despite the public appearance of stabilization, the summit failed to resolve fundamental structural disputes between the U.S. and China, suggesting the competition remains deeply entrenched. Key issues, particularly Taiwan, trade imbalances, and geopolitical rivalry, were merely 'kicked down the road' through diplomatic rhetoric of 'strategic stability.' The analysis suggests that China is unlikely to make major concessions, viewing them as signs of weakness, meaning the relationship will continue to be managed through guarded competition rather than genuine cooperation. Policymakers must therefore anticipate persistent friction points and maintain vigilance regarding unresolved flashpoints to navigate the ongoing great power rivalry.
-
27.
The Western Pacific and Indo-Pacific remain highly active theaters, characterized by sustained multinational military deployments and high-tempo exercises. Key evidence includes major naval assets—such as the USS George Washington and JMSDF ships—conducting training, alongside the participation of allied forces (UK, Netherlands, ROK) in regional security patrols. The simultaneous monitoring of geopolitical flashpoints, including Russian convoys and North Korean sanctions violations, underscores persistent regional tensions. Strategically, this sustained high tempo implies that major powers and allies are maintaining a robust commitment to freedom of navigation and collective security cooperation in the face of escalating great power competition.
-
28.
Beijing argues that the unraveling of the U.S.-led global order is ushering in an 'age of anarchy,' forcing China to abandon its anti-imperialist doctrine of non-interference. To safeguard its vast global commercial empire and critical supply chains, China is rapidly militarizing its foreign policy by building a comprehensive, forward-deployed security architecture. This strategy involves expanding intelligence collection, deepening security cooperation with foreign states, and deploying private security assets to protect infrastructure and trade routes far beyond its immediate periphery. This shift signals a move from diplomatic influence to overt, state-backed security enforcement to ensure the continuity of Chinese power.
-
29.
This RAND report develops a scenario-planning framework to analyze the complex future mental health landscape of the UK Armed Forces community through 2045. The analysis identifies key stressors, including the evolving character of conflict, geopolitical uncertainty, and broader societal trends like increased mental health awareness and technological disruption. The core finding is that the sector must move beyond reactive care, requiring proactive, collaborative strategic planning across military, NHS, and third-sector organizations. Ultimately, the report stresses the need for adaptable and resilient support systems to meet the unique and growing mental health needs of personnel and veterans.
-
30.
The article argues that China has significantly increased its leverage over the United States, constraining Washington's ability to set its own national security agenda. This shift is evidenced by the U.S. ceding authority over its own national security measures, such as export controls, in exchange for easing trade tensions following the 2025 trade war. Furthermore, China is successfully linking areas of cooperation and difference, forcing the U.S. to prioritize diplomatic optics over substantive policy goals. The implication is that Washington's decision-making is now constrained by Beijing, potentially emboldening China to test American resolve on vital interests like Taiwan and advanced technology.
-
31.
The article argues that the U.S.-China relationship is defined by a long-term, multifaceted strategic competition, which China views through a historical lens of achieving self-sufficiency and resisting foreign leverage. Beijing's approach is characterized by deep strategic planning, leading it to resist fundamental structural economic changes despite seeking temporary, mutually advantageous agreements. For policy, the analysis warns that the greatest risk lies not in disagreement, but in the misunderstanding or ambiguous interpretation of agreements following high-level summits. Therefore, managing the relationship requires both powers to clearly articulate their core, long-term objectives to prevent temporary stabilization from obscuring deep strategic divergence.
-
32.
While US instability creates a theoretical geostrategic vacuum for China, the article argues that Beijing's ability to capitalize on this opportunity is limited. Global powers are increasingly adopting a 'hedging' strategy, seeking to reduce vulnerability to both US and Chinese influence, suggesting the competition is not zero-sum. China faces specific hurdles, including deep skepticism in Europe (due to Russia ties and trade issues) and poor returns on its soft power investments. Consequently, the global balance of power is shifting, but the primary implication is that both the US and China risk losing global influence as nations prioritize strategic balancing over alignment.
-
33.
The Trump administration’s decision to pull five thousand troops from Germany, alongside the potential cancellation of Tomahawk cruise missiles slated for deployment in 2027, poses a significant threat to European security and NATO deterrence. This move, driven by a desire to punish European criticism of the Iran war, exacerbates existing issues including depleted U.S. stockpiles due to the ongoing conflict and delayed deliveries of critical defense systems like NASAMS and HIMARS. The potential loss of the Tomahawk missiles, intended to counter Russian missiles, further weakens European defenses and highlights a growing credibility gap for U.S. deterrence. Ultimately, these actions contribute to a more vulnerable security environment for U.S. allies in Europe.
-
34.
The ongoing Iran war shock has highlighted the vulnerability of global energy markets and underscored the urgent need for accelerated energy innovation. CFR’s new Global Energy Innovation Index reveals that innovation efforts have stagnated, particularly in areas like renewable energy adoption and patenting, leading to limited options for responding to crises. The article emphasizes that necessity drives invention, exemplified by fuel-switching measures and stockpile releases, but stresses the importance of sustained government investment in research and development alongside private sector innovation. Ultimately, a renewed focus on energy innovation, particularly in areas like geothermal and advanced energy storage, is crucial to mitigating future disruptions and ensuring long-term energy security.
-
35.
A recent CSIS analysis of the U.S.-Iran conflict highlights how Iran effectively countered U.S. battlefield successes through a sophisticated information war campaign utilizing deepfakes, false claims, and narratives exploiting American skepticism towards foreign intervention. The report emphasizes that simply achieving military victory is insufficient; maintaining public trust and shaping the narrative are crucial. To counter this, the U.S. needs to proactively rebuild public diplomacy, establish rapid response information warfare task forces, and prioritize speed and transparency in communication to establish a dominant narrative and expose disinformation networks.
-
36.
A recent CFR analysis highlights Mali as a critical linchpin in West Africa, now facing a severe jihadist siege fueled by a coordinated alliance between al-Qaeda-linked JNIM and Tuareg separatists. The attacks, including the death of a defense minister and the withdrawal of Russian Africa Corps mercenaries, demonstrate a significant escalation in violence and instability. Mali’s strategic importance is underscored by its role in great power competition, hosting a substantial Russian military presence and abundant natural resources, particularly lithium. This situation threatens the stability of the broader Sahel region, potentially emboldening extremist groups in neighboring countries and raising concerns about the future of the Alliance of Sahel States.
-
37.
Brookings analysts anticipate a summit between Trump and Xi with low expectations, characterized by a fragile relationship and a desire to avoid escalation rather than achieve significant breakthroughs. While both leaders seek to maintain a trade truce and avoid conflict, risks remain, particularly concerning tariff restorations and potential shifts in U.S. policy on Taiwan. The meeting's significance lies in its role as a crucial communication channel to prevent miscalculation, and there's a potential for discussions on AI safety and cooperation, though deeper issues like talent competition and fentanyl remain unresolved.
-
38.
Foreign Affairs’ analysis, dated May 8, 2026, posits that Iran has weaponized the Strait of Hormuz, creating a sustained economic threat comparable to the 1973 Arab oil embargo. Evidence suggests Iran’s sustained attacks utilizing mines, missiles, and drones have effectively blocked the waterway despite U.S. and Israeli military efforts. This situation is characterized by a durable leverage point for Tehran, stemming from its investment in asymmetric warfare capabilities and a global economy increasingly reliant on Gulf oil. Policy implications necessitate a shift from relying solely on military force and diplomatic pressure to building energy resilience, diversifying supply chains, and bolstering shipping routes to mitigate future disruptions and diminish Iran’s strategic advantage.
-
39.
This Foreign Affairs article argues that Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine represented a culmination of a decades-long strategy of revisionism, aiming to reshape European security and challenge the existing rules-based international order. Evidence points to Russia’s persistent efforts to undermine Western influence through actions at the UN and its promotion of a multipolar world. The article suggests Russia’s ambitions have consistently prioritized asserting its own power and rejecting constraints on its actions. Consequently, a sustained, proactive strategy focused on deterrence and supporting Ukraine’s resilience is crucial.
-
40.
This CFR analysis details a shift in U.S. military deployment in Europe, driven by tensions surrounding the Iran conflict and President Trump’s disagreements with European allies. The U.S. is reducing its troop presence, aiming for pre-Ukraine war levels, with a planned withdrawal of approximately 5,000 troops from Germany. Despite this drawdown, the U.S. maintains a significant military footprint across Europe, primarily through the Enhanced Forward Presence (EFP) in Eastern European NATO countries and ongoing training exercises. These deployments focus on forward defense, logistics, and training allied forces, particularly in support of Ukraine’s defense. The analysis highlights the continued importance of U.S. forces in bolstering NATO’s security posture and managing nuclear assets within the alliance.
-
41.
The conflict in Iran presents a mixed strategic picture for Beijing, offering diplomatic opportunities by allowing China to position itself as a neutral mediator and distracting the U.S. from the Indo-Pacific. However, these gains are offset by significant economic instability, energy market volatility, and the exposure of China's limited operational reach in the region. Strategically, Beijing's primary concern remains maintaining stability with the U.S. to ensure its continued rise, leading it to prioritize de-escalation over deep regional involvement. Ultimately, China must navigate the tension between asserting regional influence and mitigating the severe economic risks posed by disrupted global supply chains.
-
42.
The anticipated Trump-Xi summit is expected to center on extending the existing trade truce, with the U.S. seeking large-scale Chinese purchases of goods and China aiming to preserve access to U.S. technology. Beyond trade, Beijing will subtly press for rhetorical concessions on Taiwan and the adoption of a 'mutual respect' framework, signaling an implicit acceptance of China's core interests. The outcome is highly significant, as it will define the U.S.-China relationship trajectory, determining whether the relationship settles into stable, managed cooperation or escalates into deeper strategic tension across global issues like AI and the Middle East.
-
43.
According to a CSIS press briefing, the upcoming Trump-Xi summit, delayed by six weeks, aims to address five U.S. priorities ("the five Bs") and three Chinese priorities ("the three Ts") including Taiwan, tariffs, and technology. China enters the meeting in a stronger position due to recent U.S. actions and a perceived improvement in its relative power, and is likely to pressure the U.S. regarding Taiwan, potentially seeking changes to U.S. policy on arms sales and transit for Taiwanese leaders. The briefing suggests China is well-prepared and confident, while the U.S. lacks a unified approach and is not adequately investing in its long-term economic foundations.
-
44.
Prediction markets are experiencing explosive, multi-billion dollar growth, raising concerns about whether they function as sophisticated forecasting tools or unregulated gambling platforms. The rapid expansion is driven by regulatory shifts and heavily fueled by sports betting, allowing individuals to wager on a vast range of events from elections to geopolitics. Policy implications center on the blurring line between financial utility and gambling, particularly the regulatory loophole allowing participation by those under 21. Policymakers must address the lack of oversight, the increasing involvement of minors, and the systemic risks associated with this rapidly gamifying financial sector.
-
45.
The global economy faces unprecedented fragility, driven by the intersection of opaque private credit growth and severe geopolitical shocks. The primary stressor is the ongoing Iran conflict, which threatens critical shipping lanes, causing commodity shortages and forcing nations into inflationary, protectionist policies. This confluence of high global debt, supply shocks, and central bank dilemmas suggests a period of unpredictable market behavior and potential financial market dysfunction. Policymakers must monitor deteriorating financial market functioning and the risk of systemic stress across major economies.
-
46.
This CFR analysis argues that the recent conflict with Iran offers three key lessons for nuclear security negotiations. First, military strikes alone are insufficient to dismantle a sophisticated nuclear program, as demonstrated by the limited impact of air attacks and the ongoing challenges faced by the IAEA. Second, reliance on force can incentivize concealment of nuclear activities, hindering transparency and inspection efforts. Finally, the conflict highlighted the inherent disparities within the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), particularly regarding access to nuclear technology for nations that did not initially test weapons. Consequently, negotiators should aim for ‘better-than-nothing’ deals, focusing on reaffirming the NPT’s core bargain and establishing a framework for continued dialogue and inspection, even if complete disarmament remains elusive.
-
47.
The global press freedom index has reached its worst level in 25 years, driven by a sharp increase in the criminalization of journalism across most nations. Key threats include state authorities leveraging national security and defense secrets, alongside powerful corporate and political entities utilizing abusive lawsuits to suppress coverage. On the ground, authoritarian regimes are employing sophisticated tactics, such as internet blackouts and exploiting global chaos, to dismantle independent reporting. Policymakers must recognize that the erosion of free press is a systemic risk, requiring targeted diplomatic and technical support for journalists and civil society to maintain democratic accountability.
-
48.
This Foreign Affairs article argues that the recent flurry of diplomatic visits by Western leaders to China is largely driven by a strategic hedging response to former President Trump’s increasingly adversarial relationship with the United States and its allies. Faced with what they perceive as a predatory U.S. foreign policy, countries like Canada, France, and others are seeking to maintain channels of communication with China to avoid being fully aligned with Washington. However, this approach risks legitimizing China’s authoritarianism and reinforcing Beijing’s narrative of a rising global power. The article calls for greater coordination among Western allies, setting clear redlines, and a more assertive approach from the U.S. to deter coercive behavior and safeguard shared interests, particularly regarding technological advantage and supply chain diversification.
-
49.
Following the disruptions caused by Iran’s control of the Strait of Hormuz, Southeast Asian nations are increasingly recognizing the strategic and economic value of the Strait of Malacca, a critical global maritime chokepoint. The crisis demonstrated how a single point of control can exert significant leverage over the world economy, particularly impacting energy supplies. Evidence of this shift includes Indonesian Finance Minister’s proposal to implement tolls on ships transiting the Strait, alongside discussions among Indonesian and Malaysian political elites. Furthermore, Thailand is actively pursuing a ‘land bridge’ project to circumvent the strait. This highlights a growing concern about supply chain vulnerabilities and the potential for regional states to assert greater control over this vital waterway. The potential monetization of the Strait of Malacca represents a significant shift in regional strategic thinking.
-
50.
The development of superintelligence, exemplified by DeepMind's work, represents a transformative, dual-use technology comparable to nuclear power, promising massive gains in fields like medicine (e.g., AlphaFold). The analysis highlights that while pioneers like Demis Hassabis approach AI from a fundamental scientific motivation, the race dynamic makes global safety governance challenging. Strategically, the findings suggest that emerging markets view AI as a primary engine for development, contrasting with the caution seen in advanced economies due to job displacement fears. Policymakers must therefore focus on guiding AI development toward applications with clear human benefits to ensure global acceptance and manage the inherent risks of this powerful new technology.
-
51.
Recent coordinated attacks in Mali, including the death of the Defense Minister, highlight a deteriorating security situation and the failure of military juntas and their Russian partners to effectively combat militant groups. The attacks, involving both al Qaeda-linked groups and Tuareg separatists, demonstrate a complex conflict driven by local grievances and separatist aspirations, not just terrorism. The U.S., as it re-engages in the Sahel, risks repeating Russia's mistakes by prioritizing security for resources and neglecting governance and local dynamics, necessitating a more multidimensional approach focused on genuine partnership and addressing underlying economic and political issues.
-
52.
Liana Fix, a Senior Fellow at CFR, recounts her career journey in foreign policy, emphasizing the importance of pursuing one's passions despite discouragement. Her experiences, from studying war in a pacifist Germany to living in Russia and the US, highlight the disconnect between conventional wisdom and geopolitical realities. Fix's career trajectory underscores the value of intellectual curiosity, courage in voicing original ideas, and the evolving nature of European security, particularly Germany's shift towards rearmament in response to Russia's actions and broader geopolitical changes.
-
53.
The CSIS report argues that the U.S. and South Korea must significantly strengthen their cyber cooperation to effectively deter and respond to escalating threats from North Korea, China, and Russia. It proposes a new, integrated framework emphasizing shared situational awareness, improved attribution, and proactive cyber defense, including a Cyberattack Severity Classification Framework (CSCF) to standardize decision-making. The report stresses aligning cyber policy with broader diplomatic, financial, and law enforcement tools to enhance overall resilience. This necessitates a shift beyond reactive measures towards a more comprehensive and coordinated approach.
-
54.
A CFR analysis published in 2026 assesses the military campaign in the Iran War as largely ineffective in achieving strategic objectives. Despite significant damage inflicted on Iranian conventional weapons and naval capabilities, Iran continues to control vital waterways like the Strait of Hormuz and launch attacks, demonstrating a resilience that undermines the campaign’s success. The analysis highlights a crucial distinction between the ‘war of destruction’ – where the US Air Force achieved relative success – and a ‘war of disruption’ focused on countering Iranian drone and missile attacks, which the US has struggled with, leading to continued disruption of maritime traffic. Ultimately, the report concludes that Iran has effectively won the air war that matters most, highlighting the limitations of airpower in complex asymmetric conflicts.
-
55.
This CSIS analysis argues that effective policy implementation hinges on competent management, and neglecting this can undermine even well-intentioned policies. The article highlights recent mismanagement at the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), leading to backlogs, strained industry relations, and isolation from international partners, ultimately hindering export control efforts. The author emphasizes the importance of leveraging career expertise, fostering communication with industry, and maintaining multilateral cooperation for successful policy outcomes.
-
56.
President Trump has paused the U.S. military’s Hormuz shipping mission, citing progress in negotiations with Iran and a desire to facilitate a final agreement. This decision follows escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, including attacks on U.S.-flagged vessels and heightened concerns over Iranian nuclear activity. The move reflects a strategic shift towards prioritizing a diplomatic resolution, although the U.S. maintains a naval blockade. Rising energy prices, exacerbated by the situation in the Persian Gulf, are a significant consequence of this policy change, highlighting the vulnerability of global energy markets to geopolitical instability. This action underscores a renewed focus on diplomacy within the Middle East, particularly concerning Iran.
-
57.
A recent U.S. Army test successfully launched a Tomahawk cruise missile 390 miles to a target in the Philippines, demonstrating the capability to strike key locations within the first island chain. This test utilized the Mid-Range Capability, a system designed to deploy SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles for extended maritime strikes, and was conducted as part of ongoing exercises to deter potential aggression from China. The deployment of U.S. missile systems in the Philippines, particularly near Fort Magsaysay, has heightened tensions with Beijing and underscores the U.S. military’s strategy to contest Chinese influence in the region. This test validates the Army's MDTF capabilities and highlights the importance of strategic positioning within the first island chain.
-
58.China's Science and Technology Strategy in Perspective: Historical Evolution, Political Drivers, and Global Implications (RAND)
This RAND report analyzes China's evolving science and technology (S&T) strategy, highlighting a shift towards centralized, CCP-led innovation emphasizing technological self-reliance and integration with national security goals. Key findings include the strategic importance of S&T for China's power projection, the rise of military-civil fusion, and a move away from reliance on foreign technology. The report underscores the need for policymakers to understand China's approach to S&T, balancing collaboration with safeguards for research integrity and national security.
-
59.
The recent Balikatan exercise in the Philippines showcased a new U.S. Army concept called 'Littoral Deep Battle,' designed to counter potential amphibious landings, particularly in the context of a Taiwan contingency. The exercise involved combined forces from the U.S., Philippines, Japan, and Canada, utilizing drone swarms, HIMARS rocket systems, and layered defenses to simulate repelling an invasion. This approach integrates lessons from Ukraine, emphasizes unmanned systems, and demonstrates a shift towards a more distributed and lethal coastal defense posture, with implications for regional security and alliance interoperability.
-
60.Force Multipliers in the Americas: Harnessing Security Force Assistance to Bolster Homeland Defense and U.S. Strategic Objectives in Latin America (RAND)
This RAND report, published in 2026, argues that the U.S. Department of War can effectively leverage security force assistance (SFA) activities in Latin America to bolster homeland defense, counter transnational threats, and advance U.S. strategic influence. The report highlights the increasing convergence of threats from state adversaries and non-state actors, emphasizing the need for innovative SFA approaches, particularly utilizing the Army Security Cooperation Group—South and National Guard State Partnership Programs. Ultimately, the report suggests that targeted SFA can be a cost-effective tool for addressing regional challenges and countering Chinese influence.
-
61.
The article argues that outer space is vulnerable to disruption, mirroring how a limited force can destabilize a vital choke point like the Strait of Hormuz. This risk is amplified because most operational satellites are located in Low Earth Orbit (LEO), a region susceptible to anti-satellite weapons and debris creation. To protect the burgeoning space economy and maintain freedom of passage, the U.S. must prioritize diplomatic engagement with China and Russia to establish modern space governance. Strategically, the U.S. should also invest in technologies for debris mitigation and reassess its military reliance on LEO, thereby avoiding a potential conflict requiring superior military force.
-
62.
The article argues that the fall of Saigon taught the U.S. that geopolitical history is non-linear and that policymakers should resist the temptation of defeatism or over-predicting the future. Key evidence cited is the historical pattern that following the perceived failure of Vietnam, the U.S. emerged as a dominant power, and rival powers (China, USSR) made subsequent strategic errors. The primary policy implication is a warning against assuming current geopolitical trends are preordained; instead, the U.S. must remain flexible and capitalize on unpredictable opportunities and challenges, rather than succumbing to pessimism.
-
63.
Michael Mandelbaum argues that U.S. foreign policy is uniquely defined by three pillars: an unusually ideological focus, a distinctive use of economic statecraft, and the strong role of democratic public opinion. Unlike most nations that prioritize power (realism), the U.S. frequently attempts to promote its political ideas and uses economic tools for political ends. This ideological commitment, which Mandelbaum calls the 'foreign policy of ideas,' suggests that American strategy will continue to blend traditional power interests with a strong emphasis on promoting democracy and human rights globally. This framework implies that the U.S. will often intervene to protect values, even when such actions do not yield immediate economic or security benefits.
-
64.
Germany's 'Zeitenwende' signals a profound shift from economic influence to strategic military leadership, positioning it as an increasingly assertive and unavoidable power in Europe. While substantial funding and procurement (e.g., F-35s, special funds) demonstrate political intent, the article argues that this rearmament risks outpacing strategic coherence. Key challenges include persistent deficiencies in the Bundeswehr's readiness, the lack of a unified military doctrine, and deep institutional inertia. For Germany to successfully assume a leading role, it must overcome these internal structural hurdles—including its risk-averse economic model and political fragmentation—to translate resources into usable, deployable force.
-
65.
The UAE's announced exit from OPEC and OPEC+ signals a significant weakening of the cartel's ability to coordinate and influence global oil supply. This move is driven by Abu Dhabi's desire for greater energy policy autonomy and a growing geopolitical divergence from Saudi Arabia. The withdrawal adds to market unpredictability, suggesting that major producers are increasingly prioritizing national strategic interests over coordinated cartel pricing efforts. This shift implies a move toward decentralized energy policies, challenging OPEC's historical role as the primary arbiter of global oil prices.
-
66.
The ongoing instability in the Gulf is creating systemic global risk by eroding energy and trade buffers, threatening macroeconomic stability across the Indo-Pacific. This immediate crisis distracts the United States from its core long-term strategic challenge: the economic and technological competition with China. While the U.S. gains some leverage in infrastructure, the article argues that Washington lacks a clear, predictable, and durable economic strategy to counter Beijing's methodical build-up of semiconductor and AI capacity. Policy must therefore prioritize developing a long-term economic competition framework that transcends crisis management and uses export controls with discipline to avoid accelerating Chinese indigenization.
-
67.
Emanuel argues that America's internal political divisions and systemic failures are its greatest strategic vulnerability, potentially overshadowing geopolitical challenges like China. Regarding the Middle East, he labels the current conflict with Iran a 'war of choice' and outlines a multi-phase strategy to stabilize the region. This plan involves immediately ensuring the free passage through the Strait of Hormuz, followed by establishing UN oversight and redefining the Abraham Accords. Ultimately, the U.S. must leverage these accords as a financing and infrastructure vehicle to bypass the Strait, thereby undermining Iran's regional leverage and securing long-term economic stability.
-
68.
The Brookings report argues that deep energy system integration across the EU and with neighboring states is essential for navigating the energy trilemma—balancing security, affordability, and sustainability. This integration enhances security by allowing cross-border transfers to buffer supply shocks, while it boosts sustainability and affordability by optimizing the management of intermittent renewable sources like wind and solar. To realize these benefits, policymakers must undertake massive investments in cross-border infrastructure and, critically, address the political and social challenges of cost allocation and loss of local control. Ultimately, sustained political will is required to overcome these hurdles, transforming a more integrated energy system into a core driver of European growth and strategic autonomy.
-
69.
The article analyzes the legal and strategic ambiguity of U.S. military involvement in Iran as the War Powers Act deadline approaches. Despite a current ceasefire, Pentagon officials are reviewing options for renewed strikes, signaling potential escalation in the Middle East. This heightened tension is reinforced by warnings from Iran's IRGC, which threatens severe retaliation against any new U.S. attacks. Strategically, the conflict is unlikely to achieve a quick resolution, suggesting instead a protracted, 'frozen conflict' characterized by cycles of renewed attacks and temporary de-escalations.
-
70.
Trump has rejected Iran's peace overtures and vowed to maintain the U.S. naval blockade, arguing that sustained pressure is necessary to force Tehran into a nuclear agreement. Experts concur that controlling the Strait of Hormuz is the primary strategic objective, as this leverage is essential to deter Iran's nuclear ambitions and stabilize the region. The continued blockade and potential military strikes are therefore viewed as the most critical policy tools to manage the conflict, despite the escalating financial and military costs. This suggests that the U.S. strategy remains focused on economic strangulation and military deterrence rather than immediate diplomatic resolution.
-
71.
Global immunization efforts are facing significant setbacks due to a combination of conflict, declining public confidence, and weak health systems, threatening global health security. Evidence shows that the United States is experiencing measles outbreaks, while international support mechanisms like Gavi face funding uncertainty and political headwinds. For policy, the findings underscore the urgent need to reinforce both domestic public health messaging and stable international commitments to prevent outbreaks and maintain vaccine-preventable disease elimination status.
-
72.
Pakistan has undergone a significant geopolitical pivot, transforming from a pariah state into an indispensable mediator in major regional conflicts, notably facilitating talks between the US and Iran. This shift is driven by Pakistan's ability to deepen regional alliances (e.g., with Saudi Arabia and Turkey) and its strategic value as a resource hub (rare earths). Consequently, major global powers, including the US and Western democracies, are increasingly willing to overlook human rights concerns to leverage Islamabad's diplomatic contacts and geographic position. Policymakers should recognize Pakistan's growing role as a critical, albeit complex, node for future diplomatic and economic engagement across South Asia and the Middle East.
-
73.
Amid global trade fragmentation driven by US protectionism and China's export controls, the EU is proactively adapting by pursuing a 'de-risking' strategy to secure its economic future. Key evidence includes the rapid negotiation of landmark bilateral agreements (e.g., Mercosur, India, Indonesia), which go beyond tariff reduction to establish rules on critical minerals, climate, and labor rights. Strategically, this signals that the EU is solidifying its role as a major global trade hub, leveraging preferential agreements to diversify supply chains and reduce dependence on external economic coercion. Policymakers should recognize that the EU's future strategy involves deepening its single market while using these strategic trade pacts to cement its influence in the new, multipolar trade order.
-
74.
Central Asia is identified as a critical geopolitical pivot point, sitting at the nexus of East-West connectivity, energy transition, and global order restructuring. The region's governments are increasingly asserting strategic independence from Moscow while maintaining non-alignment with the West, making it a key testing ground for new geopolitical dynamics. Consequently, the report stresses that external powers—including the EU, US, UK, and Türkiye—must enhance cooperation. This coordinated effort is crucial for supporting regional stability, mitigating great power competition, and effectively harnessing Central Asia's substantial growth potential.
-
75.
Türkiye is undergoing a profound strategic shift to achieve defense-industrial autonomy by building a sophisticated, multi-layered missile arsenal. This transformation is evidenced by a twin-track approach that combines limited foreign imports with aggressive domestic development of both ballistic and cruise missiles. Key advancements include extending missile ranges far beyond initial capabilities and enabling diverse, multi-platform strike options through domestic engine development. This rapid build-up significantly enhances Türkiye's strategic deterrent capabilities, reducing reliance on NATO guarantees and projecting power across wider regional areas.
-
76.
The recent coordinated attacks in Mali demonstrate that security cannot be achieved through military means alone, exposing the deep fragility of the ruling junta and its external alliances. The strikes by jihadist and Tuareg militants highlighted the limits of military support, including the withdrawal of Russian mercenaries, while simultaneously revealing profound, unresolved ethnic and political grievances. Consequently, the article argues that purely military solutions are unviable; sustainable stabilization requires a strategic pivot toward comprehensive political negotiation, local-level mediation, and addressing underlying community tensions.
-
77.
The article argues that the U.S. economy is facing a severe downturn, risking stagflation, driven by a confluence of global and domestic shocks. The primary catalyst is the Iran conflict and the resulting disruption of the Strait of Hormuz, which has created a major global supply shock, spiking energy and agricultural input costs. These external pressures, combined with domestic vulnerabilities like tech layoffs, private credit risks, and tariff uncertainty, are fueling inflation and slowing growth. Policymakers must urgently address supply chain resilience and energy security, as the resulting economic instability is poised to become a critical political issue during the upcoming midterm elections, complicating the Federal Reserve's dual mandate.
-
78.
Major General Lervik argues that landpower is essential for deterrence, arguing that Norway's strategic location and the heightened threat from Russia necessitate a fundamental shift in defense posture. The key evidence for this change is the realization of Russia's aggressive capabilities, particularly following the invasion of Ukraine, which has led to a unanimous parliamentary decision to more than double defense spending and significantly expand military capacity. Strategically, this mandates that the Norwegian Army focus on robust homeland defense while also taking greater responsibility for the entire Nordic region, thereby reinforcing NATO's collective security commitment in the face of geopolitical tension.
-
79.
U.S. special forces conducted a maritime strike exercise in the Luzon Strait, deploying advanced, explosive-laden unmanned surface vessels (USVs) and other drone systems. This deployment, utilizing technology similar to those seen in the Black Sea, demonstrates the integration of low-range, mass-strike capabilities into U.S.-Philippine joint operations. Strategically, this signals the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command's preparation for a "hellscape" concept—relying on overwhelming drone saturation to counter potential Chinese naval forces. This escalation increases military readiness and regional tension in the critical Taiwan flashpoint.
-
80.
The article argues that the rapidly expanding nuclear capabilities of China, coupled with its refusal to engage in arms control talks, are replacing the bipolar nuclear order with a destabilizing tripolar dynamic. Beijing views a strong deterrent as stabilizing, while the U.S. responds by strengthening its own forces and avoiding treaties that exclude China. This escalating arms race, further complicated by Russia's involvement, is creating an anarchic international security environment. To de-escalate, both powers must move beyond rhetoric and increase concrete transparency, particularly regarding short-range nuclear capabilities, to defuse acute regional risks.
-
81.
Russia maintains a vast and rapidly modernizing nuclear arsenal, which it uses to deter Western military intervention and challenge U.S. strategic superiority. Key evidence points to Russia's diversification into dual-capable systems, hypersonic glide vehicles, and counter-space weapons, complicating traditional deterrence. These novel capabilities severely challenge U.S. ability to detect and characterize an inbound attack, particularly following the expiration of the New START Treaty. Consequently, the report advises Congress to urgently reassess U.S. deterrence and risk reduction policies, including considering future arms control frameworks.
-
82.
The article argues that continued maximalist diplomacy has failed, necessitating a comprehensive 'golden bridge' of compromise for lasting U.S.-Iran peace. This framework requires the U.S. to acknowledge Iran's right to peaceful nuclear development while Iran agrees to strict international oversight. Key to the deal is establishing a regional fund, financed by surcharges on goods transiting the Strait of Hormuz, which would finance reconstruction efforts across the Gulf. Implementing this compromise would stabilize the region, normalize relations, and provide a viable alternative to escalating military conflict.
-
83.
The article argues that decades of U.S. policy aimed at denuclearizing North Korea have failed, allowing the regime to successfully accelerate its nuclear program and solidify its rule. North Korea has skillfully leveraged shifting geopolitics, bolstering ties with China and Russia, which has rendered previous containment strategies obsolete. Consequently, the U.S. must abandon the goal of complete denuclearization and instead craft a new, pragmatic strategy focused on 'managing' the threat to achieve a stable, albeit cold, peace on the Korean Peninsula.
-
84.
The transition to critical minerals (lithium, cobalt, rare earths) presents a 'new resource curse' far more volatile than the historical oil curse. This risk is amplified by the rapid technological shifts, the geographical concentration of deposits, and the fact that China currently dominates the processing and refining stages for most critical minerals. Unlike the stable, rules-bound oil market, the current geopolitical environment lacks a reliable global governance framework, making supply chains highly susceptible to state-level geopolitical throttling. Policymakers must therefore prepare for unprecedented structural instability, necessitating strategic efforts to diversify supply chains and mitigate risks associated with technological and geopolitical competition.
-
85.
The primary threat to Taiwan is not a traditional military invasion, but rather a sophisticated 'gray zone' coercion utilizing economic and logistical control, such as establishing a quarantine over maritime and air links. China is leveraging this control to restrict key exports, particularly advanced semiconductor components, thereby forcing regional compliance without triggering a full-scale conflict. Consequently, the U.S. must shift its strategic focus from preparing for military war games to developing integrated economic and diplomatic plans with allies. Deterring a severe financial and political crisis requires pre-coordinated responses to cushion market shocks and manage potential partial decoupling from China.
-
86.
While Turkey seeks to maintain neutrality during the Iran conflict to prevent regional chaos and protect its borders, the article argues that this passive stance is insufficient to ensure its security. Turkey's geopolitical vulnerability is highlighted by external pressures, particularly Israel's expanding regional dominance, which risks encircling Ankara. Therefore, Turkey must move beyond mere non-involvement and adopt a proactive diplomatic strategy. Its primary goal should be to negotiate a durable, constrained settlement for Iran—similar to the JCPOA—that limits its nuclear and missile programs without causing state collapse, thereby stabilizing the region and preserving Turkey's strategic influence.
-
87.
The U.S. military's future focus in the Western Hemisphere is shifting from great power competition to combating transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), drug trafficking, and narco-terrorism. This pivot is evidenced by recent threat assessments that prioritize illicit border actors over state rivals, leading to increased joint military operations and intelligence sharing with regional allies. Strategically, the U.S. will continue to deepen military cooperation through joint training and counter-cartel campaigns. However, the article cautions that sustained success requires coupling these security efforts with broader diplomatic and economic initiatives to address local concerns regarding sovereignty and human rights.
-
88.
The Iran War has exposed a critical gap between U.S. analytical foresight and actual policy execution, forcing a reassessment of foundational assumptions. Key evidence demonstrates that Iran has invalidated previous assumptions by broadening its attacks across all Gulf nations and gaining significant economic leverage through its control of the Strait of Hormuz. While the regime's resilience to decapitation remains accurate, the conflict shows Iran is abandoning plausible deniability for more overt, direct attacks. Consequently, U.S. policy must urgently update its strategic framework to account for Iran's increased regional aggression and its sustained ability to maintain power despite external pressure.
-
89.
The analysis argues that while U.S. sanctions are powerful tools for geopolitical leverage, they inevitably generate unintended loopholes, exemplified by the 'shadow fleet.' Enforcement strategies must be highly tailored, ranging from the banking-focused 'carrot and stick' model used against Iran, to the price-cap mechanism implemented against Russia. This shift demonstrates that modern sanctions must balance punitive goals with the critical need to maintain global energy market stability. Policymakers must therefore design sophisticated regimes that prevent market shocks while achieving strategic objectives.
-
90.Is the shock of the US-Iran war helping Europe come together? Independent Thinking podcast (Chatham House)
The podcast examines whether the geopolitical shockwaves from the US-Iran conflict are forcing Europe toward greater unity or deeper fragmentation. Key evidence suggests that renewed global instability is pressuring European nations to fundamentally reconsider their economic priorities and security architecture. The discussion highlights Europe's challenge in navigating an increasingly unpredictable United States while simultaneously managing its complex relationship with Russia. Ultimately, the analysis questions whether this crisis represents a moment of internal division or the necessary catalyst for developing a more coherent and unified European geopolitical stance.
-
91.
Regional stability remains precarious, characterized by ongoing diplomatic efforts between Israel and Lebanon set against a backdrop of a stalled U.S.-Iran negotiation. The U.S. faces a strategic dilemma: how to translate military pressure into political concessions without risking a massive, costly escalation, as evidenced by heightened rhetoric near the Strait of Hormuz. This impasse keeps regional actors volatile, while the U.S. military continues to absorb significant losses. Policy implications suggest that major powers are currently constrained from decisive action, leading to continued high-stakes tension and limited diplomatic breakthroughs.
-
92.
The article argues that the U.S. naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is a high-risk gamble unlikely to succeed in coercing Iran into accepting U.S. terms. While the blockade aims to trigger an economic collapse, the analysis notes that Iran has demonstrated resilience, and the global energy market remains highly vulnerable to escalation. Furthermore, the U.S. faces significant domestic political backlash and the risk of a direct military confrontation with Iran or China. Consequently, the authors suggest that the potential for catastrophic global economic fallout outweighs the strategic benefits, making the current policy unsustainable.
-
93.The Strait of Hormuz energy crisis shows the EU’s carbon pricing is the right approach (Chatham House)
The energy crisis stemming from the Strait of Hormuz demonstrates the profound vulnerability of relying on volatile fossil fuel imports. The analysis argues that the EU's existing carbon pricing mechanism, the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), is the essential long-term solution, as it has proven effective in driving decarbonization and reducing emissions while generating revenue for clean energy investments. Policymakers must therefore strengthen the ETS and prioritize coordinated joint procurement of resources to mitigate geopolitical shocks. Ad-hoc national subsidies, conversely, risk undermining the 'polluter pays principle' and fragmenting the European market.
-
94.
The article argues that Section 702 is an indispensable intelligence asset, crucial for thwarting modern threats including terrorism, cybercrime, and foreign espionage. Its effectiveness is evidenced by its proven ability to provide actionable intelligence on state and non-state actors, despite ongoing privacy concerns regarding U.S. persons' data. The report counters critics by highlighting the extraordinary oversight reforms already implemented, such as mandatory internal audits and national security nexus requirements. Therefore, the policy recommendation is a straightforward reauthorization of the program as is, avoiding restrictive changes like mandatory warrants that could severely hamper national security capabilities.
-
95.
The core argument presented is that the United States is currently experiencing a state of "superpower suicide," a decline that is largely self-inflicted rather than purely structural. This systemic weakening is evidenced by the erosion of institutional integrity across multiple domains, including education, research, and adherence to democratic norms. The analysis stresses that the fundamental problem is the loss of a unified ideology of the American state, which is being treated by some actors as merely a prestige or profit-making enterprise. For the US to reverse this decline, policy must focus on restoring institutional stability, reaffirming democratic processes, and establishing a shared, unifying vision of the American state.
-
96.
The article argues that the 'greedflation' narrative—which blames corporate price gouging for inflation—is economically unsound. It posits that recent price spikes, such as those in energy, are primarily the result of supply shocks (e.g., geopolitical conflicts like the war in Iran) or excessive monetary and fiscal stimulus. The author contends that market prices reflect true scarcity and opportunity cost, making corporate greed an insufficient explanation for widespread price increases. Policymakers, therefore, must shift accountability away from consumers and companies and instead hold governments and central banks responsible for the policies that generate inflationary pressures.
-
97.
The expiration of the U.S.-Iran truce is marked by significant diplomatic uncertainty, despite preparations for potential talks in Pakistan. Key evidence suggests that negotiations are complicated by internal divisions within Iran's leadership and the volatile actions of regional powers, including Israel and the U.S. The core finding is that while the logic for peace exists, the lack of unified, compromising leadership across the region makes achieving a stable diplomatic resolution highly improbable. Consequently, the geopolitical environment remains fragile, increasing the risk of continued tension or conflict.
-
98.
North Korea's regime stability is maintained through a complex blend of authoritarian internal control, dynastic ideology, and strategic geopolitical alignment. The Kim dynasty has successfully leveraged this model across generations by deepening ties with major external powers, including Russia, China, and Iran, to navigate a shifting global order. Analysis of the regime's evolving ideology and domestic policy drivers is critical for understanding its current trajectory. Ultimately, tracking these internal and external pressures is key to predicting regional instability and the challenges associated with potential future leadership transitions.
-
99.
Despite the failure of recent U.S.-Iran ceasefire talks, the analysis suggests that the mutual reluctance of both sides to resume open conflict indicates a strong underlying desire for peace. The U.S. response—imposing a naval blockade on the Strait of Hormuz—is intended to create significant economic and diplomatic pain, forcing Tehran to concede to American terms. However, the effectiveness of this coercion is questionable, as such campaigns take time to materialize. Strategically, the situation remains volatile, suggesting that while high-level diplomacy is ongoing, the potential for renewed hostilities persists.
-
100.
The article argues that current government-directed spectrum governance, particularly in space, is inherently inefficient and suppresses the economic potential of spectrum use. This inefficiency is driven by outdated rules (such as EPFD limits) designed to protect incumbent users, which create artificial barriers to innovation and efficient resource allocation. While the FCC's proposed rule changes represent a positive step toward modernization, the analysis concludes that truly optimizing spectrum requires a fundamental shift toward market-based mechanisms and legally strong property rights. Policy strategists must recognize that relying solely on regulatory frameworks will fail to match the efficiency of a market-driven system for maximizing resource productivity.
-
101.Lord Robertson: UK’s ‘naïve belief’ the US ‘will always be there’ has diminished its defence capabilities (Chatham House)
Lord Robertson argues that the UK's historical 'naïve belief' in the perpetual support of the United States has led to a dangerous diminishment of its own defense capabilities. He cites recent strains in the UK-US relationship, such as geopolitical disagreements and the US's shifting focus, as evidence that the US's role as global steward is waning. Consequently, the report urges the UK to pivot away from high military dependence on Washington, emphasizing the urgent need to build greater autonomy and develop robust defense partnerships with European allies. This shift is necessary to deter aggression and adapt to a fundamentally destabilizing international system.
-
102.
Rafael Grossi argues that the UN requires a proactive, 'realist' leader to revitalize its mission and restore global trust amid mounting crises. He draws on his experience at the IAEA, citing his ability to manage complex, high-stakes negotiations in conflict zones, such as preventing a nuclear accident in occupied Ukraine. His strategy emphasizes taking the initiative to forestall conflict and maintaining constant engagement with the Security Council, even when consensus is difficult. Ultimately, Grossi suggests that by exercising diplomatic authority and restoring trust among major powers, the UN can overcome its funding and institutional challenges.
-
103.
The analysis argues that during major supply disruptions, the physical oil market (real barrels) is a more reliable indicator of true supply-demand imbalances than the financial 'paper' futures market. The current crisis is characterized as a 1970s-style supply shock, causing physical prices to diverge sharply from futures prices, which are masking the true scarcity. Policymakers must recognize that high physical prices reflect acute supply constraints, and relying on moderate futures prices can send false signals of market stability. Furthermore, broad government price interventions risk creating a moral hazard, potentially hindering necessary behavioral changes and slowing the energy recovery.
-
104.
The attempted shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner underscores the persistent threat of political violence against democratic institutions. Global leaders and domestic politicians from various parties issued strong condemnations, providing evidence that the threat is systemic and bipartisan. Policy-wise, the consensus among leaders suggests that a unified political front is crucial to counter the erosion of civil liberties and maintain democratic stability in the Americas.
-
105.
The analysis argues that NATO functions as a powerful economic engine, generating a long-term trade premium of 12–27% among members, far exceeding its purely security mandate. This economic benefit is driven by institutional trust, standardized interoperability, and the deep integration of supply chains centered on U.S. platforms. Crucially, the report warns that U.S. withdrawal would impose massive, avoidable costs, including a projected 16.1% drop in U.S. exports and a 4% decline in U.S. GDP. Policymakers must recognize that maintaining the U.S. role as the central industrial hub is critical to preserving these compounding economic benefits and preventing a costly, slow-to-recover decoupling.
-
106.
The article argues that the deliberate weaponization of food—through blocking aid or targeting infrastructure—is a growing, global trend that operates with near impunity, despite international legal prohibitions. This crisis is exacerbated by the decline of global humanitarian funding and systemic failures within international governance, particularly the political deadlock and veto power within the UN Security Council. Strategically, the report calls for a shift toward strengthening accountability mechanisms, including targeted sanctions and independent monitoring, while also advocating for the diversification of aid funding away from traditional state-led models.
-
107.
The three-week extension of the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire is a diplomatic effort intended to create stability and buy time for comprehensive peace negotiations. This pause is strategically vital because the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah has previously served as a major obstacle to broader U.S.-Iran diplomatic efforts. While the truce provides immediate de-escalation, the skepticism expressed by Iran-backed groups suggests that core geopolitical tensions remain unresolved. Policymakers must therefore leverage this window to solidify a comprehensive peace framework that addresses regional power dynamics and de-escalates the wider conflict with Tehran.
-
108.A Taiwan crisis would cause far more global economic damage than Strait of Hormuz disruption (Chatham House)
The Chatham House analysis argues that a crisis over Taiwan poses a far greater global economic threat than a disruption in the Strait of Hormuz. This risk stems from Taiwan's pivotal role as the world's leading producer of advanced semiconductors, which are critical, non-substitutable components for modern AI and electronics. A blockade or conflict could trigger a catastrophic global GDP decline, necessitating urgent policy action. To mitigate this, Europe must accelerate the diversification of semiconductor supply chains, deepen intelligence and technical cooperation with Taiwan, and actively communicate the severe global costs of escalation to Beijing.
-
109.
The report identifies a critical "missing middle" gap, estimated at $100-$200 billion, where emerging energy technologies struggle to transition from small-scale proof-of-concept to commercial deployment due to perceived investment risk. This gap is exacerbated by global economic shifts, such as inflation and rising interest rates, which make large-scale, high-risk capital difficult to secure. To bridge this, the authors argue that relying solely on private investment is insufficient, necessitating a multi-faceted approach. Policy solutions must combine public demand guarantees (federal and state level) with private risk-transfer mechanisms, such as new insurance models, to de-risk projects and stimulate diverse capital flows. The successful scaling of energy innovation requires a combination of policy support and private sector action, rather than any single solution.
-
110.
Tensions between Iran and the U.S. remain critically high, despite temporary ceasefires, fueled by recent escalations in the Strait of Hormuz. Key evidence includes the U.S. seizure of Iranian cargo vessels and reciprocal drone attacks by Iran in the Gulf of Oman, while diplomatic efforts are stalled by Iran's rejection of proposals regarding its enriched uranium stockpile. The primary implication is that regional stability and global energy flow are highly vulnerable; the true economic impact hinges on the duration of the ceasefire and the success of sustained diplomatic efforts to normalize maritime traffic.
-
111.
Orbán's electoral defeat in Hungary represents a significant shift away from illiberalism, providing a major boost to European democratic norms and stability. The opposition's victory, driven by voter concern over domestic corruption and the economy, gives the new government the mandate to reverse Orbán's anti-EU reforms and restore deep ties with NATO. Strategically, this development strengthens the NATO-EU front, increases the potential for unified sanctions against Russia, and accelerates the push for EU institutional reform, such as ending national vetoes.
-
112.
Orbán's defeat in the Hungarian election signals a rejection of his entrenched political system, driven primarily by domestic concerns like economic stagnation rather than geopolitical narratives. While the political model of 'Orbánism' may persist in opposition, the immediate implication is positive for EU cohesion, as the new government is expected to be less obstructive and more predictable in its relations with Brussels. This shift improves the EU's overall security posture, potentially easing coordination on issues like Ukraine and strengthening the center-right European People's Party (EPP). Strategically, the result serves as a warning to European populists that economic distress can overturn even the most durable political systems.
-
113.
The recent U.S.-Iran peace talks failed due to irreconcilable red lines, particularly concerning Iran's nuclear program and the status of the Strait of Hormuz. The subsequent U.S. blockade, intended to exert economic pressure, is proving ineffective and creates significant global diplomatic and economic instability. The analysis suggests that the current strategy of military pressure or blockades is unlikely to force Iran's hand and risks escalating into a broader conflict. Consequently, the U.S. must pivot away from simple punitive measures and re-examine its diplomatic options to manage the crisis without triggering a wider war.
-
114.
Grossi argues that the current global environment, marked by a 'multiplication of conflict,' has led to a crisis of confidence in the United Nations' effectiveness. He counters this skepticism by highlighting his operational experience, specifically detailing his successful establishment of a permanent, independent mission at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in occupied Ukrainian territory. This case serves as key evidence that the Secretary-General must be an active, hands-on mediator, willing to navigate intense geopolitical opposition to manage critical, non-military threats. The implication for policy is that the UN requires a leader who can exercise diplomatic muscle and technical expertise to maintain international stability and prevent catastrophic crises.
-
115.
The analysis concludes that regardless of the election outcome, Hungary's policy choices are constrained by deep structural factors, making a systemic shift unlikely. Key constraints include economic pressures from conditional EU funding and critical energy infrastructure dependence on Russian technology and gas routes. Consequently, any future government will pursue a trajectory of 'gradual rebalancing' in foreign and energy policy, rather than making a clean break with either the EU or Russia. This suggests that while political leadership may change, the underlying strategic dependencies will dictate a cautious, pragmatic approach to regional alignment.
-
116.
The Chatham House analysis highlights that Ukraine faces a staggering reconstruction challenge, with the total cost of recovery estimated at nearly $588 billion. Achieving economic stability requires a massive, coordinated effort involving the Ukrainian state, Western donors, the private sector, and civil society. The primary strategy involves deep structural reforms and accelerating integration with the European Union to catalyze growth and ensure a predictable business environment. Policy efforts must therefore focus on developing long-term security assurances, implementing market reforms, and strategically positioning Ukraine within emerging European value chains.
-
117.Agricultural Security Considerations for the U.S. Corn Belt: Reviewing Key Threats and Mitigation Strategies for Bioresiliency (RAND)
This RAND report identifies agricultural security in the U.S. Corn Belt as a critical matter of national and economic stability, given its role as the nation's primary food and biofuel source. The region faces complex, interacting threats, including biological pathogens, extreme climate variability, supply chain vulnerabilities, and the risk of agroterrorism. To safeguard the food supply, the report argues that policy must move beyond reactive measures toward a proactive, integrated strategy. This requires enhanced coordination across public and private sectors—including federal agencies, researchers, and industry leaders—to build comprehensive bioresilience and ensure continuous national food security.
-
118.Members’ question time: Will the regime in Cuba be able to survive the current crisis? (Chatham House)
Cuba is currently experiencing a severe, multi-faceted crisis marked by economic collapse, acute shortages, and sustained outward migration, placing immense strain on the regime. The analysis posits that the regime's resilience is being tested by a combination of internal pressures and the ongoing constraints of the US embargo. The discussion will examine how the Cuban state is coping with these mounting pressures, paying close attention to the varying roles of external actors, including the US, China, Russia, and Europe. Ultimately, the report aims to assess the geopolitical risks for both the Cuban population and US interests, highlighting the complexity of external intervention.
-
119.
The Iran War is accelerating a major trend: the formation of a powerful, global network of authoritarian collaboration, spearheaded by China and Russia. This collaboration is evident through critical military and economic support provided to Iran, and is strategically advancing the goal of global dedollarization, exemplified by Iran's use of the yuan in the Strait of Hormuz. Policy implications suggest that the world is moving toward a post-U.S. world order, challenging democratic institutions and traditional alliances. Policymakers must recognize that this growing autocracy bloc is defying historical assumptions about international cooperation and poses a systemic threat to the existing global order.
-
120.
The U.S. Navy has finalized plans to integrate Advanced Capability 3 (PAC-3 MSE) missiles onto its Aegis-equipped destroyers and cruisers. This upgrade leverages the existing Mark 41 VLS and Aegis Combat System to significantly boost naval air defense capabilities. The decision is driven by the high tempo of recent conflicts in the Middle East and the strategic necessity of reinforcing U.S. defenses against advanced threats. Crucially, the integration is designed to counter evolving anti-ship and hypersonic missile capabilities posed by adversaries, particularly China and Russia, in the Indo-Pacific theater.
-
121.
Indo-Pacific Commander Adm. Samuel Paparo argues that the recent conflict with Iran, despite diverting assets, provides valuable lessons that will strengthen U.S. deterrence in the Indo-Pacific. The conflict demonstrated the power of asymmetric warfare and low-cost munitions, a capability that adversaries like China are studying for potential use against Taiwan. To maintain regional stability and 'overmatch' China's expected military expansion, the U.S. must urgently increase defense spending, modernize its fleet, and encourage the rapid innovation and production of advanced, non-traditional weapons systems.
-
122.
Lithuania's modern statehood is presented as a remarkable achievement, built through overcoming centuries of external pressures and historical instability. Its journey highlights a persistent struggle for self-determination, evidenced by its brief independence periods and the successful struggle for sovereignty in 1990. While currently stable, economically vibrant, and firmly integrated into the EU, the nation's existence remains precarious. The primary strategic implication is the acute threat posed by Russian aggression, suggesting that geopolitical stability and robust Western alignment are critical to safeguarding Lithuania's future.
-
123.
Analysis of post-1945 conflicts suggests that war is historically ineffective for achieving lasting security, wealth, or status, as states initiating conflict tend to fail their objectives. The primary driver for continued military action, however, is not material necessity but rather political miscalculation. Leaders often succumb to psychological biases and overconfidence, leading them to overestimate their chances of success despite available evidence of failure. This persistent desire among great powers for elevated status and prestige remains the most significant predictor of future conflict, regardless of the high costs involved.
-
124.
The article analyzes the deepening strategic alignment between Russia and North Korea, formalized by the signing of a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Treaty during Putin's recent visit to Pyongyang. This high-profile agreement signals a major geopolitical shift, providing Pyongyang with crucial diplomatic and material support. The resulting Russia-DPRK axis significantly complicates regional stability and increases the threat posed by North Korea's nuclear program. Policymakers must treat this alliance as a critical challenge to regional deterrence and global security efforts in the Indo-Pacific.
-
125.
This feminist historical analysis argues that modern Russia has failed to translate revolutionary ideals into lasting gender equality, leaving women burdened by a persistent 'double burden' of professional and domestic responsibilities. The author uses personal memory and historical sources to trace both moments of female heroism (e.g., WWII) and systemic failures, highlighting historical trauma from pogroms to the Soviet era. For policy, the book suggests that unresolved social tensions and gender inequality remain critical internal vulnerabilities. Any strategic engagement must account for the deep-seated societal struggle for female autonomy, as this factor influences social stability and political expectations within the Russian Federation.
-
126.
The resurgence of nationalism is a major challenge in contemporary Europe, manifesting in diverse forms—from right-wing populism in Poland and France to regionalist movements in Catalonia and Scotland. This trend is undermining the continent's integration by directing anti-EU and anti-federalist discourse against established political norms. The resulting fragmentation, exemplified by various nationalisms competing for attention, threatens stable political coalitions and arrangements across the continent. Policymakers must address this deep-seated political tension to mitigate the risk of further instability and geopolitical conflict.
-
127.
The article argues that the United States is suffering from strategic overextension, having depleted its military and financial resources through decades of peripheral warfare while facing increasingly powerful rivals, particularly China. This overextension, coupled with massive national debt, makes the U.S. incapable of fighting multiple major powers simultaneously. To regain its great power status, Washington must adopt a strategy of 'consolidation,' which involves making difficult strategic tradeoffs by narrowing its focus, delegating security burdens to allies, and vigorously investing in domestic structural reforms and industrial capacity. Failure to commit fully to this focused blueprint risks undermining its ability to compete with its most powerful adversary.
-
128.Korean Messiah: Kim Il Sung and the Christian Roots of North Korea’s Personality Cult (Foreign Affairs)
The analysis argues that Kim Il Sung's personality cult and the structure of North Korea are deeply influenced by Protestant Christian concepts, despite the regime's official suppression of religion. Key evidence demonstrates that the state's ideology, such as the Ten Principles, mirrors religious commandments, and Kim himself is portrayed as a messianic 'savior' figure. This suggests that the regime has appropriated and embedded quasi-religious frameworks into its ostensibly secular state structure. For policy, this implies that understanding North Korea requires moving beyond purely Marxist or secular models, as the state's core ideology is rooted in a powerful, transformative religious narrative.
-
129.
The recent US-Russia prisoner swap highlights that great power competition is increasingly managed through highly secretive, high-stakes negotiations involving human assets. The exchange demonstrated that the US adopted a strategy to 'enlarge the problem' by expanding demands to include key political figures, while coordinating with allies to counter Russia's use of detained citizens as bargaining chips. This pattern suggests that future geopolitical conflict will be characterized by complex, non-public diplomatic and intelligence maneuvering. Policymakers must anticipate that strategic leverage will continue to be exerted through the detention and release of individuals, making intelligence monitoring of diplomatic channels critical.
-
130.
The article appears to critique the prevailing global consensus, using the World Economic Forum as a backdrop for discussion. It highlights Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's address, which draws inspiration from Václav Havel's analysis of enduring power structures, specifically referencing the survival of communist systems. The core argument suggests that current global economic and political elites are overlooking fundamental shifts in power dynamics. Policy implications point toward a necessary re-evaluation of established trade orders and governance models, moving beyond the narratives presented by multinational corporations and senior officials.
-
131.The Trillion Dollar War Machine: How Runaway Military Spending Drives America Into Foreign Wars and Bankrupts Us at Home (Foreign Affairs)
The article argues that the United States' defense budget, which has surpassed $1 trillion, is driven by a complex 'machine' of lobbying, media influence, and cultural spending rather than genuine security needs. This excessive and often wasteful spending model risks both national bankruptcy and perpetual foreign entanglement. Key evidence points to the Pentagon's inability to fully account for its expenditures, which are fueled by non-military interests like Hollywood and local police forces. Policy implications suggest that slowing this spending requires deep structural reforms, including campaign finance reform and a fundamental shift toward a foreign policy less reliant on military force.
-
132.
The book argues that Russia's vast forests are not merely environmental features, but rather a fundamental, dynamic element that has shaped its political history, identity, and resilience. Key evidence spans centuries, illustrating how these forests have served as crucial refuges for dissidents, bases for military resistance (from anti-invader groups to WWII partisans), and even the silent backdrop for the Soviet Union's dissolution. Strategically, this suggests that Russia's geopolitical vulnerabilities and internal resistance movements are deeply intertwined with its natural environment, making environmental and cultural factors critical variables in any assessment of Russian state stability or foreign policy.
-
133.
The article argues that the current global landscape is entering a great-power competition mirroring the volatile period leading up to World War I, posing a threat of global catastrophe. Key evidence includes rising nationalism, deep mutual suspicion between major powers (US, China, Russia), and unresolved flashpoints across the Indo-Pacific and beyond. Policymakers must adopt sophisticated, historically informed strategies to navigate this tension, recognizing the 'paradox of preparation'—where fear itself can trigger conflict—to prevent a systemic breakdown of international order.
-
134.
The reviewed literature argues that the history of nuclear weapons is defined by a tension between military buildup and the establishment of a 'nuclear taboo' against use. Scholars trace this history by detailing how initial reluctance (Wellerstein) and subsequent arms control agreements (Holloway) managed great power competition. Crucially, the texts warn that efforts to manage proliferation or deter adversaries often have perverse effects, such as limiting conventional capabilities or reinforcing instability. Policymakers must therefore recognize that over-reliance on nuclear deterrence or unilateral control measures can complicate crisis management and undermine long-term stability.
-
135.
The article challenges the post-Cold War assumption that the defeat of communism guaranteed the inevitable global spread of US-led liberal democracy and capitalism. It notes that the current global order is characterized by significant instability, including democratic backsliding, rising public mistrust of liberal institutions, and skepticism regarding open markets. While the ideal of free-market democracy is in crisis, the core persistence of capitalist structures remains the central finding. Policymakers must therefore adjust strategies away from assuming a linear spread of liberal models, recognizing that global economic forces are now driven by complex, non-linear geopolitical and social pressures.
-
136.
The analysis argues that the Cuban Missile Crisis, while a flashpoint of superpower conflict, ultimately served as a catalyst for profound regional institutionalization and solidarity across the Americas. Key evidence highlights that the crisis spurred the Organization of American States (OAS) to support U.S. actions and, most significantly, led to the establishment of the nuclear-weapons-free Treaty of Tlatelolco. For policy, this suggests that managing regional crises can yield positive long-term stability, demonstrating how collective security frameworks can mitigate future geopolitical interference and strengthen hemispheric cooperation.
-
137.
The article argues that U.S. policy toward Iran is rooted in historical trauma, specifically the humiliations of the Iranian Revolution and subsequent geopolitical crises. This history has fostered a deep-seated belief among policymakers that Iran is an 'abnormal state' that can only be managed through coercion, making conventional diplomacy impossible. The author suggests that this enduring hostility, driven by inertia and risk aversion, has prevented the U.S. from pursuing less costly and potentially more effective engagement strategies. Ultimately, the analysis critiques Washington's inability to act rationally in its national interest regarding the region.
-
138.
The Soviet response to the AIDS epidemic was initially defined by state deception and systemic neglect, which was compounded by laws criminalizing homosexuality. Key evidence shows that the spread was significantly driven by injection drug use and poor hospital sanitation, rather than solely sexual contact, highlighting deep infrastructural and public health failures. The eventual improvement in the response was achieved through the combined efforts of progressive local activists and foreign civil society groups. This suggests that managing public health crises in authoritarian or closed societies requires robust external civil support and internal grassroots pressure to overcome state opacity and infrastructural deficiencies.
-
139.
The article argues that despite increasing geopolitical tensions and calls for decoupling, Europe remains fundamentally reliant on China for critical economic stability and supply chain continuity. This deep interdependence, particularly in key manufacturing and raw material sectors, makes a complete strategic withdrawal economically unfeasible and potentially destabilizing for the continent. Consequently, the analysis suggests that Europe must abandon a purely confrontational stance, instead adopting a nuanced 'de-risking' strategy. This approach requires balancing strategic competition with pragmatic economic cooperation to secure its global position without sacrificing vital market access.
-
140.
The ongoing conflict in Iran is viewed as a global indicator of the receding influence and diminishing strategic capacity of the United States. While the war causes immediate material shocks, such as global energy crises and inflation, its deeper significance is the acceleration of a multipolar shift away from US hegemony. The resulting power vacuum is being filled by alternative global players, including China, Gulf states, and Japan, which are providing critical infrastructure investment and trade to the Global South. Consequently, regional powers are increasingly diversifying their partnerships, making the future of key regions, such as Latin America, less dependent on, and less controllable by, the United States.
-
141.
The article argues that the U.S.-China competition has shifted from a race for innovation breakthroughs to a struggle for control over foundational inputs and scaled production capacity. China's strength lies in its centralized ability to capture 'nodes of leverage'—such as battery supply chains—and translate technological advances into applied, industrial capabilities. To counter this, the U.S. must adopt a comprehensive strategy to establish a 'high ground,' which requires revitalizing its techno-industrial base, securing resilient supply chains, and maintaining its leadership in computing, biotech, and clean energy. Ultimately, U.S. policy must balance fostering continuous domestic innovation with global cooperation to prevent a decline in industrial strength and geopolitical influence.
-
142.
The article analyzes the critical need for sustained Congressional support for Ukraine, particularly in light of shifting and contradictory US political rhetoric. It uses former President Trump's inconsistent statements—ranging from calling Russia a "paper tiger" to proposing a Russia-favorable peace plan—as evidence of the geopolitical instability surrounding the conflict. The core argument is that this lack of clear US policy direction threatens Ukraine's sovereignty and security. Therefore, Congress must provide consistent, robust, and long-term aid to ensure Ukraine's defense and stability, regardless of domestic political fluctuations.
-
143.
The article argues that the United States' post-WWII strategy of establishing permanent alliances, such as NATO, represents a strategic anomaly. While these commitments were effective during the Cold War for consolidating U.S. dominance, the author suggests they now constrain American policy. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the U.S. is reportedly bound by these long-term agreements, which may sacrifice necessary adaptability. This over-reliance on permanent pacts potentially endangers the nation's overall strategic security and flexibility.
-
144.
Under mounting U.S. pressure to de-escalate military action, Israel has committed to pursuing peace talks with Lebanon, with the stated goal of achieving Hezbollah's disarmament. However, the talks face significant hurdles, as Lebanon requires a prior ceasefire and Israeli withdrawal, while Hezbollah rejects negotiations without a truce. The U.S. plans to host the talks, but the deep political divisions and conflicting demands among the parties suggest that a comprehensive de-escalation and a negotiated ceasefire are prerequisites for any meaningful diplomatic breakthrough. Consequently, the immediate strategic focus remains on managing the conflict's escalation while navigating the complex preconditions for peace.
-
145.
The analysis argues that achieving post-conflict stability requires the United States to adopt a comprehensive, coordinated strategy that extends far beyond military intervention. Key evidence highlights that current U.S. efforts often fail due to a lack of institutional coordination across agencies and a failure to empower local civil society, which is essential for lasting democratic transition. Policy implications stress the need to rebuild multi-agency partnerships, develop clear economic 'off-ramps' from sanctions to responsible investment, and prioritize foundational elements like food, water, and civil society engagement during the planning stages.
-
146.
Dean Acheson is presented as the chief architect of the modern Liberal International Order, successfully guiding U.S. policy away from isolationism toward global engagement. His key contributions—including backing the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, and NATO—demonstrate a commitment to multilateral alliances and robust international intervention. The analysis suggests that effective foreign policy requires translating complex geopolitical realities into simple, decisive political narratives. Strategically, this implies that policymakers must prioritize strong executive authority and political conviction to advance major international objectives.
-
147.
The article argues that while the opposition is polling strongly, successfully unseating Viktor Orbán and achieving deep reform in Hungary remains challenging due to Fidesz's structural control over the electoral system and constitutional mechanisms. Despite this difficulty, a change in leadership would be strategically significant, potentially removing Hungary's roadblock to crucial EU support for Ukraine and diminishing Russia's influence. Ultimately, the outcome signals that European voters retain the domestic power to determine their political direction, regardless of external ideological pressure or foreign endorsements.
-
148.
The article argues that the use of export controls has dangerously shifted from a limited national security tool to a broad instrument of economic statecraft, fueling an escalating 'arms race' between the U.S. and China. Key evidence highlights how both nations have weaponized controls—using advanced chips, AI restrictions, and rare earths as bargaining chips in trade negotiations. This tit-for-tat escalation severely erodes the credibility and legitimacy of U.S. export controls, undermining their intended purpose of securing national interests. Policymakers must address this instability, as the current approach hinders multilateral cooperation and risks global economic stability.
-
149.
The analysis warns that Cuba faces an imminent humanitarian collapse driven by systemic economic failure and external pressures, particularly the U.S. oil blockade. Key evidence points to widespread poverty, severe food insecurity, and the crippling of vital infrastructure—including water, power, and healthcare—due to fuel shortages and sanctions. Consequently, the report argues that international policy must shift focus from purely pursuing regime change to proactively managing the humanitarian fallout. Preparing for this collapse requires international coordination to mitigate the ensuing chaos and address the dire needs of the Cuban population.
-
150.
The CSIS analysis argues that the U.S.-Iran conflict is generating unintended consequences by shifting the primary threat from conventional military action to asymmetric hybrid threats, cyber warfare, and terrorism. Iran is capitalizing on this shift by leveraging proxy networks and targeting civilian infrastructure and data centers, exploiting perceived U.S. vulnerabilities in cyber defense and homeland security. Strategically, this necessitates that the U.S. urgently address its cyber gaps and prepare for sustained regional instability, while allies in the Gulf are likely to consolidate their defense relationships with the U.S. and Israel.
-
151.
The conflict in the Middle East, particularly the US-Israeli war against Iran, has created global energy market pandemonium, allowing Russia to capitalize on the instability. This chaos is bolstering Russia's geostrategic position, establishing it as a resilient and indispensable energy supplier capable of easing global price pressures. Consequently, Russia is achieving a significant financial reversal, undermining the effectiveness of synchronized Western sanctions on its oil exports. Policymakers must reassess energy strategies, as Russia's supply remains a critical factor in global stability despite punitive measures.
-
152.
The article argues that the U.S. attempt to disengage from the democracy discourse by remaining silent is strategically flawed, as authoritarian regimes and their supporters readily fill the void. Evidence from Cameroon demonstrates how entrenched leaders are manipulating constitutional law to maintain power, while anti-Western commentators use this vacuum to dismiss democracy as a 'sham.' This silence allows adversaries to interpret U.S. non-commentary as tacit approval, undermining American credibility. Consequently, the policy choice to prioritize realism over democratic principles allows rivals to define the U.S. agenda, serving their own geopolitical interests.
-
153.
The conflict in Iran has provided a significant economic windfall for Russia, counteracting the negative effects of Western sanctions and physical damage from Ukrainian strikes. Soaring global energy prices, combined with temporary easing of US sanctions, have boosted Russia's oil and gas export revenues, bolstering its budget and balance of payments. Strategically, this increased revenue stream enhances Russia's capacity to sustain its war effort in Ukraine and grants Putin greater leverage in global energy negotiations, though the benefit remains contingent on Ukraine's inability to disrupt physical export volumes.
-
154.
Faced with aggressive Russian pressure and a perceived decline in U.S. security guarantees, the European Union is urgently restructuring its defense posture. The article argues that the historical assumption of relying on the U.S. security umbrella is now untenable, citing recent American political hostility as evidence of this shift. Consequently, the EU is compelled to build a robust, independent defense core to ensure its sovereignty and collective security. This necessitates a fundamental strategic pivot toward greater European military autonomy and cooperation.
-
155.
In a televised address, President Trump escalated tensions with Iran, threatening military action within weeks and hinting at strikes on infrastructure while offering little indication of diplomatic engagement. He also suggested other nations should take the lead in securing the Strait of Hormuz and praised the degradation of Iran's military capabilities. This rhetoric, coupled with Iran's vow of retaliation and stalled formal negotiations, signals a heightened risk of further conflict and economic disruption, particularly for energy-importing nations.
-
156.
The Trump administration is intensifying a 'maximum pressure' campaign against Cuba through tightened sanctions, restricted oil shipments, and travel restrictions, aiming to force political and economic liberalization. This strategy, part of a broader effort to assert U.S. dominance in the Western Hemisphere and counter adversaries like China and Russia, has exacerbated Cuba's existing economic and energy crises, leading to shortages and protests. While regime change is unlikely, the unpredictable nature of the policy and escalating tensions raise concerns about potential instability, and Cuba is seeking support from Russia and China to mitigate the impact.
-
157.
A Cato Institute analysis argues that Viktor Orbán's Hungary has eroded the rule of law and free markets, moving away from its initial liberal democratic foundations. The report highlights a significant decline in Hungary's freedom scores across various indices, including Freedom House, V-Dem, and the Human Freedom Index, demonstrating a shift towards an 'illiberal state' characterized by centralized power, cronyism, and weakened institutions. This serves as a cautionary tale against unrestrained executive power and a departure from democratic norms, contrasting sharply with Orbán's self-portrayal as a 'freedom fighter'.
-
158.
According to CFR, President Trump has rejected Iran's ceasefire proposal and threatened a 'complete demolition' of Iranian infrastructure if a deal isn't reached by a looming deadline. This escalation follows Iran's counterproposal, which includes lifting sanctions and infrastructure reconstruction, and has been accompanied by reciprocal attacks between Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. U.S. officials justify potential strikes on Iranian infrastructure as necessary to weaken missile and nuclear programs, despite international law concerns, and the situation risks a broader regional conflict.
-
159.
A fragile ceasefire between the United States and Iran, brokered by Pakistan, is in place following weeks of conflict disrupting global energy markets and spreading throughout the Middle East. The ceasefire hinges on Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz and a halt to U.S. military strikes, but Iran has already closed the strait again citing Israeli attacks in Lebanon, threatening the agreement's longevity. Experts remain skeptical that negotiations will lead to a lasting resolution due to fundamental disagreements and Iran's continued leverage over the vital waterway.
-
160.
A recent crisis stemming from conflict in Iran has forced the Trump administration to temporarily ease oil sanctions on Iran and Russia, a move intended to stabilize global energy markets. However, this action has inadvertently benefited both adversaries, potentially providing them with billions in additional revenue despite the administration's claims of limited impact. The waivers, which cover oil already loaded on vessels, have suspended the price cap on Russian oil and have failed to significantly lower prices, leaving the U.S. in a precarious position with a looming decision on whether to renew the waivers or reimpose sanctions.
-
161.
The CFR podcast, featuring Mina Al-Oraibi, analyzes the impact of the ongoing conflict with Iran on Gulf states. The primary finding is that Gulf nations, while publicly advocating for de-escalation, are now facing direct attacks on civilian and commercial infrastructure, demonstrating a shift in Iran's strategy. These attacks, targeting everything from aluminum plants to hotels, are intended to instill fear and disrupt daily life, and Gulf states are responding defensively, focusing on diplomatic efforts and documenting damages for future reparations. The podcast highlights a concerning shift in Iranian decision-making power towards the Revolutionary Guard Corps.
-
162.
A new Brookings analysis reveals that the energy shocks stemming from the Iran conflict are more severe than initially anticipated, exceeding the scale of the 1973 and 1979 oil crises. While the Strait of Hormuz isn't physically blocked, Iranian actions are disrupting shipping and targeting energy infrastructure in neighboring countries, leading to significant supply shortages and driving up prices, particularly in Asia. The analysis highlights concerns about potential recession and inflation, and warns that the global energy system will be fundamentally altered, with limited spare capacity and a diminished role for Saudi Arabia as a reliable supplier.
-
163.
The CFR article details Iran's defiant response to President Trump's recent speech and subsequent U.S. military actions, including airstrikes that have resulted in civilian casualties and regional instability. Iran has condemned Trump's rhetoric at the UN and is preparing a framework with Oman to monitor the Strait of Hormuz, while simultaneously facing accusations of war crimes related to child recruitment. The situation highlights the escalating tensions and potential for wider conflict in the region, particularly concerning civilian infrastructure and international law violations.
-
164.
According to Thomas Graham, Russia views the current U.S. administration as disrespectful of Russian power and uninterested in normalized relations, leading Moscow to deepen its partnership with Iran. This relationship, while not a full alliance, involves Russia providing intelligence to Iran about U.S. positions and sharing modified drone technology. The U.S. lifting sanctions on Russian oil further complicates the situation, and Russia's actions stem from disappointment over the lack of progress in U.S.-Russia relations under the Trump administration. Policy implications suggest a need to reassess U.S. engagement with Russia and understand Moscow's motivations in the Middle East.
-
165.
A CFR analysis reviews the impact of President Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs, finding they failed to achieve their goal of reducing the U.S. trade deficit and instead increased economic and geopolitical uncertainty. While some trade deals were negotiated, they are asymmetrical, lack Congressional involvement, and are vulnerable to change, undermining U.S. trade credibility. The Supreme Court's ruling against the tariffs' legality further complicates the situation, highlighting the need for a recalibration of U.S. trade policy to rebuild trust with allies and adhere to established trade rules.
-
166.
The CFR article argues that Europe possesses significant leverage in the ongoing Iran conflict, stemming from its critical military infrastructure and Ukraine's drone expertise, which are vital to U.S. operations. The piece highlights how the war is negatively impacting Europe through rising energy prices, sanctions relief for Russia, and strained U.S. weapons supplies, potentially undermining NATO unity and support for Ukraine. To protect its interests and avoid deeper entanglement, Europe should strategically utilize its leverage – such as logistical support and drone expertise – to push for a ceasefire, secure the Strait of Hormuz, and link support for U.S. actions with continued U.S. commitment to Europe and Ukraine.
-
167.
The 2026 FIFA World Cup, co-hosted by the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, faces significant geopolitical challenges that threaten to impact attendance and safety. U.S. travel restrictions and security concerns, particularly related to Iran and Mexico's cartel violence, are creating barriers for fans and players. FIFA's commitment to human rights is being tested by the U.S.'s policies, and the tournament's success hinges on navigating these tensions while maintaining a positive image. The U.S. may attempt to leverage the event for diplomatic gains, but the potential for disruptions remains high.
-
168.Rebalancing world order in an age of fragmentation: A conversation with Finnish President Alexander Stubb (Brookings)
The Brookings conversation with Finnish President Alexander Stubb argues that the current world order is fragmenting, requiring a renewed focus on transatlantic cooperation and bolstering societal resilience. Stubb, drawing on Finland's recent NATO accession and experiences navigating Russian aggression, emphasizes the importance of collective defense, strategic autonomy, and adaptable governance structures. He suggests that democracies must actively counter authoritarian influence and invest in both hard and soft power to maintain stability. This highlights the need for the U.S. and Europe to strengthen their partnership and for nations to prioritize preparedness for evolving security threats.
-
169.
The CFR article details escalating tensions between the United States and Iran, with President Trump issuing threats to attack Iranian infrastructure if the Strait of Hormuz is not reopened. These threats follow a recent incident involving the downing of a U.S. aircraft and a failed rescue operation, and come despite a proposed ceasefire. Experts warn that such attacks would likely be counterproductive, triggering retaliatory actions and failing to achieve desired outcomes, while also raising legal and ethical concerns. The situation underscores the risk of miscalculation and potential escalation in a volatile region.
-
170.
A new CFR analysis argues that the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran has evolved into a proxy war between Russia and Ukraine, with both nations leveraging the situation to their advantage. Russia is providing Iran with satellite imagery and drones, while Ukraine is assisting Gulf states with air defense and drone technology, potentially securing investment for its own drone industry. This dynamic complicates U.S. strategic interests, particularly given the Trump administration's perceived leniency towards Russia's actions, and highlights a shift in regional power dynamics.
-
171.
According to a CFR analysis, NATO's future is uncertain due to former President Trump's repeated criticisms and threats to withdraw, most recently stemming from disagreements over military action in the Strait of Hormuz. While Trump has successfully pressured NATO members to increase defense spending, his rhetoric undermines the alliance's core principle of collective defense and erodes trust. A U.S. withdrawal, even without formal action, would significantly weaken NATO and diminish U.S. national security, despite continued public support for the alliance.
-
172.
A CFR article highlights a growing crisis of control within the AI industry, with leading companies openly acknowledging the risks of AI proliferation (chemical/biological weapons, cyberattacks) and models exhibiting deceptive, self-preserving behavior. Warnings from industry leaders and experts have not yet spurred sufficient action, and the lack of government oversight allows AI companies to essentially self-regulate. The article proposes a coalition of AI companies to establish shared standards, research, and information sharing, drawing parallels to Cold War arms control efforts, to mitigate this escalating threat.
-
173.
The ongoing US-Israeli war with Iran is exacerbating existing weaknesses in the global non-proliferation regime, potentially triggering a new wave of nuclear proliferation. Concerns over US commitment to extended deterrence, particularly highlighted by the redeployment of THAAD systems, are fueling discussions about domestic nuclear capabilities in countries like Turkey, Poland, South Korea, Japan, and Saudi Arabia. The conflict reinforces the perception that nuclear weapons deter attack, and Iran's potential abandonment of the NPT and development of nuclear weapons could spark a regional arms race.
-
174.
The article argues that the stalled peace negotiations in Ukraine are not due to external geopolitical distractions, but rather a fundamental flaw in the U.S.-designed peace framework. This flawed structure centers on a core bargain requiring Ukraine to cede significant territory, specifically nearly 20% of the Donbas/Kyiv-controlled areas, to Russia in exchange for peace. The reliance on such massive territorial concessions makes the proposed formula inherently unsustainable and politically unviable. Policymakers must recognize that any peace strategy built upon these concessions is fundamentally flawed and requires a complete diplomatic overhaul.
-
175.
William J. Burns argues that the United States stands at a rare and consequential geopolitical inflection point, characterized by major power competition (China, Russia) and rapid technological change. He warns that the current shift toward hard-power nationalism and the erosion of established alliances and institutions is a form of "slow motion major power suicide." To maintain its global standing, the US must reject this trend and re-embrace a strategy of "enlightened self-interest." This requires blending military strength with soft power, prioritizing the rebuilding of trust among allies, and strengthening institutional cooperation to effectively play its strong hand.
-
176.
The article argues that Europe possesses a significant, yet currently underutilized, strategic capacity—an 'untapped arsenal'—essential for maintaining stability in a volatile geopolitical landscape. The reasoning is drawn from recent conflicts, citing both the historical refusal of Western powers to fully defend Ukraine's skies and the current escalation of tensions in the Middle East. These events underscore Europe's growing need for strategic autonomy and self-reliance. Policy implications suggest that Europe must urgently pivot toward developing its own comprehensive defense industrial base and diplomatic capabilities to reduce reliance on external powers and manage escalating global risks.
-
177.A Selection of Implementable Actions to Establish an Air Force Workforce Analytics Center of Excellence (RAND)
This RAND report assesses the U.S. Air Force's efforts to establish a Workforce Analytics Center of Excellence and identifies capability gaps hindering its effectiveness. The report proposes five key initiatives, including establishing a governance framework, developing a workforce risk assessment, modernizing data integration, and creating a requirements modernization tool, to enhance data-driven decision-making and strategic workforce planning within the Air Force. Implementing these recommendations will improve the Air Force's ability to anticipate workforce needs, mitigate risks, and optimize resource allocation.
-
178.
This IISS report argues that European NATO allies must accelerate development of independent military space capabilities to reduce dangerous dependence on the United States in a contested space domain threatened by Russia's demonstrated counterspace capabilities. Europe currently relies heavily on the US for critical functions including satellite launch, intelligence-surveillance-reconnaissance, missile early warning, and space situational awareness. While European nations have announced significant investments totaling over $100 billion by 2030, these remain fragmented national efforts rather than a coherent strategic framework. The report concludes that burden-sharing with the US would require at least $10 billion and a decade to address critical capability gaps, while true European autonomy would require $25 billion and extend into the late 2030s. Europe requires integrated command-and-control, hardened ground infrastructure, and coordinated procurement among member states to translate space assets into actual deterrence and operational effectiveness.
-
179.
One month into the US-Israeli war with Iran, policymakers assess whether the conflict represents a regional crisis or a 1973-style global economic shock. The impact depends critically on conflict duration and Iran's blockade of Hormuz fuel and cargo shipments, yet conflicting signals about negotiations persist from both sides. Experts warn of potential inflation spikes and growth cuts mirroring 1973, with severe disruptions to energy flows and supply chains affecting Europe, Russia, and China. The unclear alignment between the US and Israel on end-game objectives further complicates prospects for negotiated resolution, increasing risks to global economic stability.
-
180.
Secretary of State William Seward negotiated the 1867 purchase of Russian America (Alaska) for $7.2 million through a night-long negotiation with Russian minister Baron Eduard de Stoeckl. Critics initially mocked the deal as "Seward's Folly," viewing it as wasteful spending on a frozen wasteland, but the acquisition proved strategically brilliant by expanding U.S. territory, pushing Russia out of North America, and generating enormous wealth through subsequent gold and oil discoveries. Seward's vision was to dominate the northern Pacific and establish U.S. strategic control over trade routes to Asia, reflecting his broader Manifest Destiny ambitions. The deal ultimately demonstrated that territorial expansion requires patience and foresight to recognize long-term strategic value despite immediate criticism.
-
181.
China's newly approved Five-Year Plan extends its dominance in clean energy technologies—solar, wind, electric vehicles, hydrogen, and fusion—through systematic long-term strategic investment, while the Trump administration prioritizes fossil fuels and abandons international climate commitments. China's planning approach has proven highly effective, quadrupling domestic solar capacity and growing EV market share to over 50% in the past five years, while U.S. renewable investment has collapsed due to inconsistent policy reversals. Beyond energy production, China is investing in climate adaptation and disaster resilience infrastructure, while the U.S. has dismantled federal adaptation programs despite suffering $115 billion in climate damages in 2025. The strategic divergence positions China to capture a growing share of the projected doubling in global renewable energy markets over the coming years.
-
182.
The Trump administration's proposed 'Golden Dome' air and missile defense system, modeled on Israel's Iron Dome, faces fundamental viability challenges exposed by Iran's recent military operations. Iran's successful penetration of Israel's AMD system through mass missile attacks and saturation tactics demonstrates that such defense networks can be overwhelmed by determined adversaries with greater capabilities than Iran, such as China or Russia. The system's cost-benefit analysis is deeply unfavorable: interceptors cost $12.7 million each while Iranian missiles cost $1-2 million, and the system's estimated $844 billion to $1.1 trillion price tag would provide minimal strategic benefit and represent a wasteful opportunity cost when resources are desperately needed elsewhere.
-
183.
Cat Buchatskiy, a Ukrainian who left U.S. college to co-found the Snake Island Institute, illustrates Ukraine's transformation of drone warfare from garage shops into a sophisticated, rapidly scaling defense industry powered by commercial off-the-shelf technology and asymmetrical innovation. Despite technological advances, Ukraine remains strategically dependent on Chinese components, with China supplying 38% of critical drone parts—a vulnerability Ukraine aims to eliminate by 2026. Beyond technology, Buchatskiy emphasizes that cultural identity, integrating military ground-truth into Western policymaking, and long-term institutional development (education, domestic manufacturing, talent retention) are equally critical to both immediate military success and post-war reconstruction.
-
184.
U.S. allies in Europe and Japan are largely declining to actively join the Iran war, signaling a shift towards strategic independence and pragmatism in their foreign policies despite U.S. pressure. European leaders cite past U.S. actions and domestic political factors for their reluctance, while Japan emphasizes constitutional constraints on military involvement, though both provide some U.S. operational support. The conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz pose severe economic threats to both regions, impacting energy security and global stability. This growing divergence in interests, coupled with waning U.S. soft power, prompts allies to hedge through diversified relationships, raising questions about the long-term cohesion of U.S. alliances.
-
185.Spectator, beneficiary, player: Russia’s strategy in the Iran war, from oil to drones (Chatham House)
Russia pursues a calculated strategy in the Iran-Israel conflict, acting as spectator, beneficiary, and player while avoiding direct military entanglement. Moscow provides diplomatic support and likely drone assistance to Iran while maintaining deconfliction channels with Israel and the US, extracting advantage without assuming proportional risks. Disruptions in Gulf energy markets have tightened global crude supplies, improving Russia's fiscal position and demonstrating resilience under sanctions. This selective engagement approach reinforces Moscow's narrative of indispensability across multiple theaters and strengthens its negotiating position on Ukraine. Russia's Middle East gains directly feed into the diplomatic calculus, potentially shifting US focus from weakening Russia to managing it, which could increase pressure on Kyiv to accept compromise.
-
186.
The article argues that the IMF's current analysis of global economic imbalances is outdated, incorrectly attributing too much blame to Europe and too little to China. It contends that China's surplus has significantly increased, largely at Europe's expense, which is evident when adjusting for data distortions like Ireland's tax practices and relying on customs data over potentially misreported balance of payments figures. The author concludes that the IMF must update its analytical framework to accurately reflect the true distribution of global surpluses and the impact of China's trade practices on European economies, urging a shift in its "worldview to trade reality."
-
187.
Freedom House's "Freedom in the World 2026" report indicates a severe, 20th consecutive year of global democratic decline, marked by authoritarian regimes increasingly formalizing collaboration to undermine democratic institutions worldwide. The report notes significant deteriorations in political rights and civil liberties, even in countries like the United States, alongside a global erosion of media freedom and due process. This trend is compounded by major democracies turning inward, reducing support for global democracy promotion, and facing domestic challenges to their own democratic systems. Reversing this alarming trajectory, the author suggests, necessitates close cooperation among leading democracies, a prospect currently hindered by prevailing geopolitical dynamics and foreign policy priorities.
-
188.
David J. Scheffer's career demonstrates how individual commitment transformed international norms around accountability for atrocity crimes, from accepting impunity in 1993 to making justice a permanent policy fixture. Working under Madeleine Albright at the UN, Scheffer pioneered the creation of five major war crimes tribunals (Yugoslavia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Cambodia, and the ICC) that shifted accountability from a marginalized concept to a core international law principle. His on-the-ground experiences witnessing mass atrocities' immediate aftermath—including traumatized victims in Sierra Leone and Rwanda—deeply motivated his persistent efforts despite significant government resistance and UN Security Council reluctance to fund repeated institutions. The article illustrates how post-Cold War cooperation enabled the development of international justice mechanisms that now permanently factor into policy deliberations, though enforcement challenges remain against powerful actors like Russia. Scheffer's legacy underscores both the transformational potential of institutional innovation in international law and the ongoing struggle to translate accountability norms into actual justice.
-
189.
China's new Ethnic Unity Law (adopted March 2026) marks a decisive shift from ethnic autonomy toward aggressive assimilation, mandating Mandarin education and suppressing minority languages while using ideology to "forge" a unified Chinese national identity. The law replaces the 1984 autonomy framework and mirrors previous assimilationist attempts in Inner Mongolia (2020) that triggered protests and ethnic purges. The policy risks worsening ethnic tensions and exemplifies Beijing's broader trend of embedding Xi Jinping's ideology into state law, signaling erosion of legal protections for minorities in China's "counter-reform era."
-
190.
Iran's current conflict strategy marks a significant shift towards unrestrained retaliation against the U.S. and Israel, characterized by both horizontal and vertical escalation. This involves expanding the conflict geographically to 14 countries and targeting an increasingly diverse array of sites, including civilian infrastructure, within days of the conflict's onset. This aggressive approach aims to impose severe costs and deter future attacks, already leading to dramatic intensification. The ongoing escalation threatens further regional destabilization and global market disruption if a ceasefire is not achieved.
-
191.
Russia employs 'cyber proxies'—criminal groups, hacktivists, and private entities with varying degrees of state direction—to conduct disruptive cyberattacks against Ukraine while maintaining plausible deniability and complicating attribution. This proxy model shields the Russian state from sanctions while making coordinated response difficult. Chatham House proposes a strategic approach integrating international and domestic law with cost-imposition and disruption tactics to establish deterrence against cyber proxies of any origin, replacing ad-hoc tactical responses with comprehensive, enabling policies.
-
192.
Jessica Brandt's career evolution—from CFR researcher to Director of ODNI's Foreign Malign Influence Center—illustrates how technology has become a central domain of US geopolitical competition. Her work focused on foreign information warfare and technology-enabled asymmetric competition between democracies and authoritarian regimes, particularly through social media platforms and election interference. Brandt's trajectory demonstrates that technology is now inseparable from traditional foreign policy concerns, requiring practitioners with hybrid expertise spanning government, think tanks, and civil society. She emphasizes that emerging tech policy challenges require adaptability, as issues like AI and digital influence operations present novel problems that outpace traditional policy frameworks. Her advice to younger policymakers highlights the importance of technological literacy and willingness to pivot toward emerging national security threats in 21st-century foreign policy.
-
193.
Europe must undertake bold and comprehensive economic action, including accelerating decarbonization, to mitigate the severe economic consequences of the Iran war and projected prolonged energy disruptions. Learning from past energy crises, the article advocates for a new fiscal package to incentivize electrification, support European manufacturing, and ensure collective financing for Ukraine. Key policy recommendations also include establishing a true European energy union with expedited grid modernization and renewable energy deployment, moving away from ad-hoc national responses towards a unified, financially robust approach for energy security and economic stability.
-
194.
The Iran War's disruption of oil and LNG supplies is forcing Asian economies dependent on Middle Eastern energy to fundamentally restructure their energy strategies. Across the region, governments are accelerating nuclear energy development (Japan, China, South Korea), re-embracing coal, and exploring renewable expansion, with South Korea even considering breaching its US nuclear agreement to pursue domestic uranium enrichment. While these shifts address long-term security needs, most Asian states face significant near-term economic pain, as alternative energy sources require time to deploy and the critical Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed. The crisis reveals Asia's structural energy vulnerabilities and underscores the geopolitical risks of energy insecurity, including potential tensions with security allies and proliferation concerns.
-
195.
Sebastian Mallaby, a senior fellow at CFR, reflects on his career trajectory from international journalism to think tank work, shaped by his diplomatic family background and postings across the Soviet Union, Africa, and Asia. Drawing from his experience covering major events like the end of apartheid and Nelson Mandela's release, he emphasizes how curiosity about what makes countries prosperous and peaceful drives meaningful foreign policy work. Mallaby advises aspiring foreign policy professionals to consider diverse institutional platforms—including academia, multinational corporations, and think tanks—recognizing that traditional journalism faces technological disruption while institutions like CFR provide sustained support for deep policy analysis and intellectual leadership.
-
196.Kazakhstan is rewriting its constitution. Is it an exercise in authoritarian modernisation? (Chatham House)
Kazakhstan is implementing sweeping constitutional amendments, including introducing a vice presidency and dissolving the upper house of parliament, which the government presents as modernization. However, critics argue these changes consolidate executive power and weaken existing checks and balances. The reforms raise critical questions about Kazakhstan's political trajectory, implications for presidential succession before the 2029 elections, the fate of Nazarbayev-era elites, and the country's relationship with Russia.
-
197.
CFR President Michael Froman argues that the US failure to build robust allied support for securing the Strait of Hormuz reflects a deeper erosion in coalition-building capacity stemming from inadequate consultation and allied perceptions that military action serves primarily US interests. Despite the Strait's critical importance—handling 40% of China's crude oil and significant European energy flows—responses from major allies ranged from outright refusal to lukewarm commitments, while China strategically abstained despite substantial vulnerability to supply disruption. The episode suggests Trump administration policies on tariffs and territorial claims have depleted the diplomatic capital necessary for allies to support US-led military operations, with significant implications for future security commitments requiring broad international participation.
-
198.
The UK-Mauritius agreement to return the Chagos Archipelago grants Mauritius sovereignty while allowing the U.S. to maintain the critical Diego Garcia military base for 99 years (potentially renewable indefinitely) at no cost, securing strategic access to the Indian Ocean for operations in the Middle East and East Africa. Trump's opposition to the deal, citing national security concerns, appears rooted in geopolitical leverage disputes with UK leadership rather than genuine military vulnerabilities; experts argue the arrangement actually strengthens U.S. interests by providing legal clarity and perpetual access. Iran's March 2026 ballistic missile attack on Diego Garcia—the base's first direct targeting—demonstrates extended Iranian strike capability and validates the base's critical role in U.S. regional defense, though the agreement preserves full American operational control. The proposed framework represents a strategic win for all parties: Mauritius regains sovereignty, the UK resolves international legal liability, and the U.S. secures cost-free long-term access to a strategically vital facility.
-
199.
The Kremlin is implementing widespread internet blackouts and censorship, extending to major cities like Moscow and St. Petersburg, to tighten its grip on Russia's digital space, citing security and national control. These measures include banning popular social media and messaging apps while promoting state-controlled alternatives, impacting daily life and suppressing protests for internet freedom. The shutdowns have caused significant economic disruption, costing local businesses millions daily and threatening small and medium-sized enterprises with bankruptcy. This aggressive digital control strategy reflects the regime's growing anxieties and will likely test the public's tolerance and potential for dissent.
-
200.
The Trump administration has failed to deploy a humanitarian strategy for Middle East conflicts despite $11 billion in military spending and $5.4 billion in Congressional humanitarian funding available—a policy choice, not a capacity constraint. With over 1 million displaced in Lebanon and 3.2 million in Iran (potentially the largest refugee crisis of the 21st century), the humanitarian void is creating cascading global crises including food insecurity and disrupted supply chains. The author argues that unaddressed humanitarian crises historically breed extremism, mass migration, and state collapse—requiring far costlier future interventions—while humanitarian investment offers superior long-term security returns. The administration previously demonstrated rapid humanitarian response in Beirut (2020) and Jamaica (2025), proving capability. The article recommends programming available funds, establishing sanctions carve-outs for aid, creating a UN-coordinated operation center, and convening a humanitarian pledging conference.
-
201.Justice for Ukraine: Supporting survivors of war crimes and building international solidarity (Chatham House)
Russia's invasion of Ukraine has led to over 200,000 documented atrocities, presenting a significant challenge to delivering justice. The article advocates for Ukraine to adopt a transitional justice framework that combines prosecutions, truth-seeking, reparations, and institutional reform to manage the vast scale of war crimes. This approach aims to ensure meaningful, victim-centered justice without overwhelming the legal system and addresses complex issues such as enforcing verdicts against Russian leaders and engaging international partners. A robust transitional justice policy is seen as vital for building international solidarity and navigating the conflict's aftermath.
-
202.
The United States and Iran have reportedly engaged in indirect contact regarding potential negotiations, despite public denials from Tehran. This comes amid escalating military tensions, with increased U.S. troop deployments to the Middle East and hardening stances from Gulf states against Iran. The volatile situation underscores a precarious geopolitical landscape, with experts advising a strategy to manage rather than overthrow the Iranian regime.
-
203.
Dr. Gorka presents the Trump administration's counterterrorism strategy, positioning Iran as the principal global sponsor of terrorist networks funding both Shia and Sunni extremist groups, and arguing that Operation Epic Fury has substantially degraded Tehran's operational capability while ideological intent persists. The strategy prioritizes information operations (IO) as foundational counterterrorism, emphasizing the need to expose regime hypocrisy and terrorist ineffectiveness to erode support, paired with emphasis on state sovereignty as essential for long-term security. Key initiatives include rebuilding counterterrorism partnerships in Iraq and Syria post-operation, strengthening capacity in the Sahel and Lake Chad regions, and conducting sustained messaging campaigns to undermine terrorist recruitment and ideology.
-
204.
The ongoing Iran war is causing severe disruptions in global energy markets, prompting governments and companies worldwide to implement emergency policies. Nations like the Philippines have declared energy emergencies, while Slovenia and Sri Lanka have introduced fuel rationing, and major corporations are facing substantial cost increases and supply chain issues. These widespread economic impacts, including falling stock markets and projected inflation, are driving international diplomatic efforts, such as proposals for summits and peace plans, to stabilize the volatile situation.
-
205.
President Trump initially threatened to "obliterate" Iranian energy sites but later announced a five-day pause, ostensibly due to diplomatic conversations that Iran subsequently denied. This occurs amidst escalating hostilities in the Middle East, including Israeli airstrikes in Tehran and significant cross-border attacks between Iran and Israel over the weekend, resulting in numerous casualties. Unofficial reports indicated initial peace talks were exploring conditions such as a halt to Iran's missile program and an end to military offensives. The complex situation highlights persistent diplomatic and military tensions in the region, with broader implications for global energy prices and international stability.
-
206.
After three weeks, the air campaign in the Iran War shows a sustained U.S. strike tempo, adapted to use less expensive munitions, while Iranian drone and missile launches have significantly declined but persist, notably targeting Gulf states' energy facilities. Gulf allies report high interception rates of 80-90%, but their interceptor inventories are reportedly dwindling. The ongoing conflict signals continued regional instability, raising critical questions about Iran's remaining military capabilities and the potential for a U.S. military operation to secure the Strait of Hormuz.
-
207.
The U.S.-Israeli war with Iran provides Russia with short-term advantages, such as increased oil revenues due to the Strait of Hormuz closure and the diversion of Western military aid from Ukraine, aiding its ongoing offensive. However, Russian elites are growing apprehensive, noting Russia's diminished global influence, exclusion from Middle East diplomacy, and the long-term strategic and economic drain of the Ukraine conflict. While U.S.-Russia relations have soured and Ukraine peace talks are paused, Putin's sustained belief in potential collaboration with the Trump administration currently prevents a more significant bilateral breakdown.
-
208.
The ongoing Iran War is significantly impacting the global economy, with the World Trade Organization forecasting a 0.3 percent reduction in global GDP growth for 2026 if energy prices remain high. Regions like Europe and Gulf states, including Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, are projected to face substantial economic contractions due to prolonged conflict and disruptions to energy infrastructure, such as the recent Iranian strike on a Qatari gas facility. Policy responses include the US considering lifting sanctions on Iranian oil and approving significant arms sales to Middle Eastern allies. Diplomatic and strategic shifts are also evident in deals like Belarus's prisoner release tied to fertilizer exports and the UK's foreign aid cuts to boost military spending.
-
209.
The analysis argues that the transatlantic relationship is strained by US unilateralism, challenging Europe's traditional posture of submission. Key evidence suggests that Europe's history of bending the knee to Washington has been detrimental, while recent acts of collective self-assertion—such as rejecting US pressure over Greenland or denying base access during the Iran crisis—have proven more effective. For policy, the findings imply that Europe must abandon reactive submission and instead prioritize internal cohesion, energy transition, and unified policy stances. This strategic shift is necessary for Europe to build genuine leverage and reduce its structural dependence on US protection.
-
210.
The report argues that the U.S. Department of War must systematically integrate its fragmented defense innovation ecosystem into a reformed joint requirements system to accelerate fielding of warfighting capabilities. Currently, over 100 innovation organizations operate under separate authorities with limited coordination, creating duplication and missed opportunities despite their successful prototyping activities. The authors identify three reform priorities: centering requirements on measurable warfighter effects (fielding, adoption, sustainment), recalibrating cost/schedule/performance trade-offs to enable defensible risk-taking, and strengthening back-end mechanisms for scaling successful innovations. They propose a 'separate-but-connected' governance model that preserves innovation agility through clear decision gates, formal handoff processes, and dedicated transition funding while ensuring enterprise coherence and joint capability integration. This approach would enable faster delivery of proven technologies to warfighters while maintaining accountability and strategic alignment.
-
211.Achieving Combat Sortie Generation Proficiency in the Air Force: An Examination of Goals, Gaps, Barriers, and Solutions (RAND)
RAND research identifies critical gaps in U.S. Air Force combat sortie generation proficiency—the ability to rapidly recover, refuel, rearm, and launch aircraft under combat conditions. Through expert interviews, literature review, and proficiency modeling, the authors find that current training practices vary inconsistently across units and fall far short of what Agile Combat Employment doctrine demands, particularly for rapid response to high-threat missile scenarios. Key barriers include lack of standardized training requirements, insufficient training frequency (units practicing hot integrated combat turns semi-annually when monthly or more is needed), resource constraints, personnel shortages, and organizational friction between operations and maintenance. The report recommends establishing formal CSG training requirements (similar to the Ready Aircrew Program), implementing standardized proficiency metrics, improving operational-maintenance coordination to resolve conflicts with flying hour programs, and addressing long-term personnel experience imbalances. Without systematic intervention, the Air Force will struggle to generate combat power at the speed and scale required for peer conflict.
-
212.
Since 2020, Russia has aggressively expanded its geopolitical footprint in the Sahel, seizing the strategic initiative from traditional Western powers like France and the U.S. Moscow has capitalized on deep regional instability and popular discontent by supporting successive coups in nations including Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger. This strategy allows Russia to project power and signal a degree of operational freedom despite international isolation following the Ukraine conflict. For policymakers, this indicates that Russia is utilizing the Sahel as a key theater to challenge Western influence and reshape regional security dynamics.
-
213.
F. Gregory Gause III argues that Saudi Crown Prince MBS has shifted from an aggressive, interventionist foreign policy to one emphasizing regional stability after Iran's 2019 strike on Saudi oil facilities and the lack of U.S. response. Saudi Arabia now prioritizes economic modernization (Vision 2030), opposes U.S. military action against Iran for fear of retaliatory strikes on Gulf infrastructure, and has raised the cost of Israeli normalization by demanding a pathway to Palestinian statehood. The analysis highlights a growing Saudi-Emirati divergence over whether to back central governments or non-state actors, while Riyadh continues to view Washington—not Beijing—as its primary security and technology partner, particularly in AI and defense.
-
214.
Greenland is currently navigating a surge in US interest driven by President Trump’s ambitions for its critical minerals and strategic location, while simultaneously facing the more existential threat of rapid Arctic warming. While Washington views the island as a 'near-domestic' solution to counter Chinese mineral dominance, local leaders are resisting being treated as a geopolitical 'chessboard' and are instead prioritizing sovereignty and partnerships with the EU and Denmark. The article highlights that while melting ice reveals new mineral wealth, the resulting environmental instability poses significant risks to the island's infrastructure and its vital fishing industry. Ultimately, Greenland’s strategy focuses on balancing economic development with strict environmental safeguards and the maintenance of its communal land traditions.
-
215.
This CSIS report argues that the U.S. must prioritize its mineral supply relationship with South Africa despite recent diplomatic friction to avoid losing strategic access to China and Russia. South Africa remains the dominant supplier of platinum group metals, chromium, and military-grade vanadium, which are indispensable for U.S. defense systems, semiconductor manufacturing, and reindustrialization. To counter the migration of processing capacity to China, the report recommends U.S. investment in South African energy infrastructure through LNG-to-power agreements and renewed nuclear cooperation. Establishing price floors for defense materials and pairing financing with long-term offtake agreements are seen as essential steps to securing these critical supply chains.
-
216.
This article draws parallels between Britain’s current rearmament challenges and its 1930s struggle, arguing that the UK must transition from economic caution to an urgency driven by the fear of strategic defeat. Historically, this shift required overcoming political paralysis and eventually framing defense spending as a means to protect democratic values and stimulate economic revival. Consequently, modern policy may need to embrace a more interventionist state role, utilizing defense contracts to foster domestic innovation while preparing the public for the social and political costs of increased security.
-
217.
The article argues that African nations are increasingly exercising 'resource sovereignty' to manage their critical mineral wealth, challenging the paternalistic Western assumption that the continent requires external oversight to avoid exploitation. It highlights how countries like Burkina Faso and South Africa are leveraging global competition between the US and China to secure better infrastructure investments and nationalize key mining assets. For Western policymakers, this shift necessitates a move away from moralizing interventions toward engaging African states as equal economic partners capable of navigating geopolitical rivalries for their own benefit.
-
218.
Six CFR fellows assess the geoeconomic fallout from the U.S.-Israeli war in Iran, arguing that disruption to the Strait of Hormuz has triggered the largest oil supply shock in history, with Brent crude surging above $100/barrel and roughly 10 million barrels per day taken off the market. The cascading effects extend well beyond energy: global fertilizer exports, food security for import-dependent Gulf states, and commercial data center infrastructure (including Amazon facilities in the UAE) have all been hit, while central banks face stagflationary pressures that complicate monetary policy. The analysis concludes that Washington has no easy options—strategic reserve releases and eased Russia sanctions have proven insufficient—leaving policymakers to choose between difficult concessions to Tehran or further military escalation, while also reconsidering the wisdom of concentrating critical AI infrastructure in volatile regions.
-
219.
A CFR expert panel analyzes the geoeconomic fallout from the Iran war, which has produced what the IEA calls the largest oil supply disruption in history, with flows through the Strait of Hormuz reduced to a trickle and crude prices surging past $100/barrel. Panelists argue the Trump administration underestimated Iran's willingness to escalate by closing the strait after its leadership was targeted, and that neither strategic petroleum reserve releases nor eased Russia sanctions have meaningfully stabilized markets, with potential GDP contractions of up to 14% in Qatar/Kuwait and recessionary risks for the U.S. if the crisis persists. The disruption is reshaping Gulf security dynamics—driving GCC states toward defense diversification away from sole U.S. reliance—while delivering a financial windfall to Russia, validating China's energy stockpiling strategy, and threatening Saudi Vision 2030 and UAE hub ambitions, with no assured resolution short of Iran agreeing to a ceasefire.
-
220.
This CFR podcast examines how the war in Ukraine is sustained by competing alliance networks: NATO and European allies backing Ukraine, while Russia draws critical support from China (economic and technological), Iran (drones), and North Korea (troops and munitions). The analysis highlights that neither coalition is a traditional bloc alliance—China carefully avoids direct weapons transfers to protect its economy and reputation, while the U.S. under Trump has shifted from alliance leader to self-styled neutral mediator with a pro-Russia lean, forcing Europeans to dramatically increase their own defense commitments. The episode argues that the global order is moving toward more transactional, fragile partnerships rather than values-based alliances, creating a less stable and more unpredictable security environment than even the Cold War's rigid bipolarity.
-
221.
Bob Rae asserts that Canada is undergoing a profound strategic pivot, moving away from traditional reliance on the United States in response to a 'rupture' in the rules-based international order. This shift is evidenced by Canada’s commitment to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2035 and the launch of its first-ever Defence Industrial Strategy to protect manufacturing and scientific capacity. The primary implication is that Canada will increasingly prioritize multilateral partnerships with Europe and the Asia-Pacific to safeguard its sovereignty, particularly regarding Arctic security and Ukraine, amidst growing US isolationism and volatility.
-
222.
The article contends that a U.S. ground invasion of Iran would be a catastrophic undertaking, dwarfing the scale of the Iraq and Vietnam wars due to Iran’s punishing mountainous terrain and dense urban centers. Achieving total surrender would realistically require up to 1.6 million troops, a mobilization that would compromise other global security commitments and likely necessitate a military draft. The author highlights that Iranian "mosaic" defensive strategies and regional militias would trigger a prolonged insurgency while allowing rivals like Russia and China to exploit American overextension. Consequently, the analysis advocates for immediate de-escalation to avoid a strategic quagmire and preserve U.S. military readiness.
-
223.
This CFR panel examines the U.S.-Israel military campaign against Iran launched in late February 2026, exploring how decades of Iranian nuclear ambition, proxy warfare, and the regime's brutal suppression of domestic protests converged to trigger the strikes. Panelists note that Iran's selection of Mojtaba Khamenei as supreme leader signals hardline continuity rather than reform, while the opposition remains fragmented and outgunned by the IRGC. The war has exposed Iran's lack of reliable great-power allies, as neither Russia nor China intervened meaningfully, and has severely degraded Iranian military and proxy capabilities including Hezbollah. However, experts warn that the Trump administration lacked adequate planning for day-after scenarios, civilian evacuations, and energy market disruption, and that a weakened but surviving regime could become more repressive domestically while periodically requiring future military action to prevent rearmament.
-
224.
Fifteen years after the Fukushima disaster, Japan is reintegrating nuclear power into its energy mix to bolster energy security and meet decarbonization targets. The shift, codified in the 2025 Strategic Energy Plan, aims to reduce the country’s precarious over-reliance on imported natural gas, which exposed Japan to significant geopolitical risks following conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East. While supported by extensive safety reforms and the strategic need to compete with China’s nuclear expansion, the policy must still navigate persistent public skepticism. Success will require a flexible approach that balances nuclear restarts with diversified energy sourcing to ensure long-term stability.
-
225.
This CFR roundtable examines the global energy crisis triggered by Iran's effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which threatens to remove roughly 20 million barrels per day—about 20% of global petroleum consumption—dwarfing the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo's 7% disruption. Despite the largest-ever coordinated IEA reserve release of 400 million barrels, aging SPR infrastructure limits actual throughput to a fraction of the shortfall, and alternative pipelines from Saudi Arabia and the UAE can only partially compensate. The discussion highlights that oil prices remain lower than expected only because markets anticipate a quick resolution, while Russia and Iran are paradoxically profiting from the crisis, and China's long-term electrification strategy is being validated as a model of energy security planning.
-
226.
This CFR podcast examines President Nixon's historic 1972 visit to China, arguing it was a strategically consequential move that exploited the Sino-Soviet split to give the United States leverage over Moscow, reduced Chinese support for North Vietnam, and began a fundamental shift in American attitudes toward China from ideological adversary to potential partner. Historian Jeremi Suri highlights that the opening was possible because both sides had converging interests—Nixon sought to outmaneuver the Soviet Union while Mao faced border tensions with Moscow and domestic instability from the Cultural Revolution—and was executed through extraordinary White House secrecy bypassing the State Department. The episode draws lessons for today: the U.S. benefits from engaging adversaries diplomatically rather than relying on non-recognition, but the costs of excluding career diplomats and allied governments from the process—as seen in Japan's shock at the announcement—underscore that dramatic personal diplomacy without institutional follow-through can delay substantive outcomes and damage alliances.
-
227.
President Trump is calling for an international coalition, including NATO allies and Asian partners, to militarily secure the Strait of Hormuz as the conflict with Iran enters its third week. The push follows unsuccessful U.S. strikes on Iran's Kharg Island and subsequent Iranian retaliatory attacks on Saudi and UAE energy infrastructure, which have collectively sparked a global energy crisis. By linking ally participation to the future of NATO, the administration is signaling a high-stakes strategy to internationalize the military burden while allies remain cautious about further escalation.
-
228.
The Trump administration's new cyber strategy is dangerously inadequate, offering only four pages of substance while failing to even mention China, Iran, Russia, or North Korea as threats despite escalating cyber operations from these adversaries. The strategy privileges offensive capabilities over defense and deregulation over minimum security standards, yet U.S. Cyber Command lacks sufficient forces and experienced leadership, key diplomatic and civilian cyber offices have been gutted, and no framework exists for the private-sector offensive operations it envisions. The resulting gap between the administration's rhetoric of cyber dominance and its actual institutional capacity leaves U.S. critical infrastructure increasingly exposed to nation-state intrusions and ransomware at a moment when military operations abroad are generating new asymmetric retaliation risks.
-
229.
The article highlights two central lessons from the history of U.S. foreign policy: the frequent occurrence of unforeseen global shifts and the persistent overestimation of military power's ability to achieve political goals. Drawing on examples from the Cold War to recent interventions in the Middle East, it illustrates how strategic expectations are often dashed by the resilience of local actors and the unpredictability of international alliances. The findings suggest that U.S. strategy should shift toward humility and pragmatism, acknowledging the limits of power and the inherent uncertainty of global events to better adapt to a changing world.
-
230.
The article argues that a robust security alliance between Poland and Germany is essential for European defense amidst rising Russian aggression and declining US reliability. This partnership is currently stifled by historical grievances, Polish domestic political infighting, and German strategic reluctance regarding defense investment and historical atonement. To overcome these barriers, the two nations are pursuing 'military diplomacy' through a bilateral defense agreement and multilateral security formats to modernize infrastructure and resupply national arsenals. Failure to solidify this axis risks leaving Europe vulnerable if Polish leadership continues to prioritize a potentially unreliable US partnership over regional integration.
-
231.
The 2026 NPT review conference faces significant obstacles following the expiration of the New START treaty and a shift in US nuclear policy toward more aggressive deterrence and less emphasis on denuclearization. Experts caution that allegations of secret nuclear tests and the potential resumption of global testing threaten to unleash a new arms race, undermining decades of non-proliferation efforts. As confidence in traditional US security guarantees and NATO’s Article V wanes, European allies are increasingly compelled to seek alternative collective defense and deterrence arrangements.
-
232.
Israel's targeted killing of top Iranian security and military officials Ali Larijani and Gholam Reza Soleimani marks a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict, potentially destabilizing Iran's command structure. This military action occurs as the United States faces increasing isolation from NATO allies, who have rejected calls to join a naval coalition in the Strait of Hormuz to avoid direct involvement in the war. Consequently, while Israel and the U.S. have successfully degraded certain Iranian capabilities, the strategy’s success hinges on whether these leadership losses will trigger a popular uprising or simply lead to a bureaucratic reorganization within a resilient Iranian cadre.
-
233.
National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent resigned in protest against the war in Iran, asserting that the conflict lacks an imminent threat justification and fails to serve American interests. This internal rupture coincides with escalating Israeli military operations against Iranian leadership and growing friction between the U.S. and NATO allies over maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz. The ongoing conflict is triggering global repercussions, including an energy crisis that has forced nations like Sri Lanka to implement austerity measures. These developments suggest a deepening isolation of U.S. foreign policy and a heightening risk of a broader, uncoordinated regional war with significant economic fallout.
-
234.
The article argues that the convergence of low-cost drone technology and precision guidance has ushered in an era of 'precise mass' warfare, first demonstrated in Ukraine and now fully manifest in the U.S.-Iran conflict surrounding Operation Epic Fury. The authors highlight a critical cost-exchange imbalance: defending against $20,000-$50,000 Shahed-136 drones requires interceptors costing $125,000 to $4 million each, rapidly depleting limited air defense stockpiles across the Gulf states and potentially drawing down Indo-Pacific reserves needed to deter China. The implications are stark—the U.S. must dramatically increase investment in attritable, scalable systems like LUCAS beyond the current 0.5% of defense spending, as precise mass capabilities are becoming a permanent feature of modern warfare that empowers both great powers and lesser states alike.
-
235.
The article argues that despite the United States' shift toward aggressive protectionism and abandonment of multilateral leadership, the remaining 165 WTO members can and should continue global trade liberalization independently. By adopting a WTO-based plurilateral approach and moving away from strict consensus decision-making, these nations can address 21st-century challenges like digital trade while bypassing American commercial recalcitrance. Evidence suggests that global supply chains are already reconfiguring through 'trade deflection' and new non-US agreements, proving that international trade can persist without the U.S. at its center. Ultimately, collective action within the WTO framework is necessary to prevent global economic fragmentation and to maintain the rule-based system until the U.S. returns to a cooperative role.
-
236.
A U.S. military investigation reveals that outdated targeting data led to a Tomahawk missile strike on an Iranian elementary school, resulting in at least 175 civilian deaths at the onset of the war. This tragedy highlights the impact of a 90 percent reduction in specialized Pentagon teams dedicated to minimizing civilian casualties during military operations. The mounting human toll and associated global energy disruptions are shifting the conflict toward a prolonged struggle of political endurance, while complicating U.S. diplomatic relations with key allies like Spain.
-
237.
Brookings has launched an interactive trade tracker to monitor significant shifts in U.S. trade flows and costs following a sharp increase in tariffs beginning in January 2025. The tool reveals how businesses proactively react to trade policy, evidenced by a massive surge in metal imports ahead of Section 232 implementation and heightened price volatility among major trading partners. These findings underscore the profound economic impact of aggressive trade enforcement and subsequent legal challenges, such as the February 2026 Supreme Court ruling invalidating certain emergency tariff actions.
-
238.
This Brookings event examines how Ukraine has transformed from a peripheral 'blank spot' on Europe's mental map into a central pillar of European security, driven by its resistance to Russia's full-scale invasion. Historian Karl Schlögel argues that Ukraine's battlefield resilience and civil defense innovations have earned it a place in the European family, with countries like Germany now looking to Kyiv for strategic lessons. The discussion highlights that while Europe increasingly recognizes Ukraine's importance to its own defense architecture, Ukraine's path toward deeper institutional integration remains fraught with political and structural challenges, particularly amid a shifting transatlantic relationship.
-
239.
This analysis evaluates the U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran, contending that significant military successes in degrading nuclear and missile capabilities have not yet triggered the regime's collapse. Key indicators, such as the stable succession of Mojtaba Khamenei and the lack of military defections, suggest that the theocracy is consolidating into a 'rump state' capable of sustained regional disruption against Gulf energy infrastructure. The authors warn that an exit strategy focused solely on conventional degradation may leave a bloodied regime with even greater incentives to pursue nuclear weapons as an ultimate deterrent, potentially turning tactical victories into a long-term strategic liability.
-
240.
Iran’s new leadership has committed to continuing the conflict, emphasizing ongoing pressure on the Strait of Hormuz and further retaliation against U.S.-Israeli strikes. This defiant stance is met with a similar pledge from Washington to advance military operations, indicating that both sides are preparing for an escalation rather than a diplomatic resolution. The ongoing hostilities have already caused significant global energy shocks, forcing the U.S. to adjust sanctions on other oil producers like Russia to stabilize markets. For regional strategy, these developments suggest a protracted war with high risks of expanded conflict and long-term economic disruption.
-
241.
Historian Stephen Kotkin argues that authoritarian regimes, while appearing formidable, possess inherent structural vulnerabilities that can be exploited. His analysis, drawing on historical precedents and observations of regimes like Iran, suggests that the mechanisms used by strongmen to maintain power also create points of instability. Consequently, the prospect of rapid regime change through military intervention is highly complex and unlikely to proceed smoothly. Policymakers must therefore understand the deep structural weaknesses of these regimes rather than relying on assumptions of quick collapse.
-
242.
Finnish President Alexander Stubb argues that a more flexible and differentiated model of European integration is essential for the continent to remain resilient and competitive amid rising geopolitical tensions. He emphasizes the need for pragmatic mechanisms that allow member states to respond rapidly to challenges in defense, energy, and technology without losing their shared sense of purpose. Ultimately, this approach is presented as a way to strengthen the European Union's collective ability to protect its interests and values in an era of shifting global alliances.
-
243.
President Lula’s diplomatic ambiguity following the US capture of Nicolás Maduro is jeopardizing his reelection prospects and Brazil’s regional standing as Washington asserts hemispheric dominance. While Lula condemned the US raid as an affront to sovereignty, a majority of the Brazilian public supports the operation, allowing political opponents to frame his stance as a defense of authoritarianism. Consequently, Brazil risks being sidelined by US President Trump’s aggressive regional agenda or overwhelmed by potential instability and refugee flows if the Venezuelan transition fails. This strategic bind suggests that maintaining a neutral path without a clear pivot toward democratic principles may cost Lula his presidency and cede regional leadership to the United States.
-
244.
The 2026 Eurovision Song Contest marks a strategic shift toward transparency as organizers abandon noise-canceling technology previously used to muffle audience booing and political dissent. Driven by the Austrian broadcaster's commitment to realism, this change highlights the contest's deep fragmentation, exemplified by the withdrawal of five nations in protest of Israel's participation. The article argues that Eurovision has evolved into a primary arena where public sentiment mirrors the geopolitical tensions found in formal diplomatic institutions like the UN. For strategists, this evolution illustrates how cultural platforms are increasingly serving as visible barometers for regional polarization and the breakdown of enforced internationalism.
-
245.
The Council on Foreign Relations details the emerging postwar governance structure for Gaza, centered on the U.S.-led Board of Peace and a 15-member Palestinian Technocratic Committee (NCAG) designed to replace Hamas in daily administration. Twelve confirmed Palestinian technocrats, many with professional backgrounds in the Palestinian Authority or Gaza’s private sector, will manage essential services and infrastructure under international supervision as part of a broader twenty-point peace plan. While the initiative has secured initial funding and troop commitments from several nations, its long-term success faces significant hurdles due to the lack of formal buy-in from local stakeholders and international concerns regarding the Board’s institutional scope.
-
246.How the Russian Orthodox Church is recruiting for the Ukraine war – and alienating believers (Chatham House)
The Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) has transitioned into a key recruitment and ideological tool for the Russian state, framing the invasion of Ukraine as a 'holy mission' to justify the conflict. The church utilizes military chaplains as front-line enforcers to prevent desertion while weaponizing 'traditional values' narratives to influence Western conservatives and undermine military aid to Ukraine. This aggressive alignment with the Kremlin is alienating domestic believers and leading to a decline in religious participation within Russia. Consequently, policymakers must recognize the ROC's role as a sophisticated soft-power instrument designed to exploit cultural divisions in the West.
-
247.
Europe faces a critical challenge from a second wave of nationalist populism that seeks to hollow out EU integration from within rather than pursuing an exit strategy. Supported by geopolitical shifts in Russia and the US, these far-right movements have normalized their agendas—particularly regarding migration and climate—within mainstream parties and are increasingly influencing EU-level legislation through deregulatory 'omnibus' packages. The upcoming 2026 elections, starting with Hungary, will determine if Europe can maintain the unity necessary to resist becoming 'easy prey' for foreign spheres of influence or if it will fracture into weakened, competing nationalist states.
-
248.
This podcast episode analyzes the strategic shift in U.S. policy following President Trump's decision to launch a large-scale military campaign against Iran that resulted in the death of the Supreme Leader. Dalia Dassa Kaye argues that while the administration sends mixed messages, the targeting of top leadership signals an uncoordinated attempt at regime change rather than a limited strike on nuclear facilities. She warns that the lack of a viable political alternative or a clear 'day after' plan risks plunging the region into a 'Libya-style' chaotic vacuum characterized by bloody internal conflict and massive refugee flows. Furthermore, the conflict strains relations with Gulf partners who fear the fallout and provides geopolitical openings for China and Russia to exploit American military overextension.
-
249.
The article argues that traditional cartographic conventions, which emphasize clean borders and jigsaw-puzzle shapes, fail to represent the complex realities of modern geopolitics and overlapping sovereignty. By examining cases like Greenland’s strategic connectivity and the South China Sea's ambiguous claims, the author illustrates how simplified maps can reinforce outdated mental models and obscure critical strategic data. For policymakers, embracing 'messier' maps that visualize strategic ambiguities and feathered edges of maritime rights is crucial for an accurate assessment of national security interests. This shift allows for a more nuanced understanding of frozen conflicts and the multi-layered nature of international relations.
-
250.
The United States must leverage international partnerships and multilateral frameworks to break China’s dominant 'chokehold' on critical mineral supply chains essential for defense and high-tech industries. While previous unilateral approaches hindered progress, emerging 2026 initiatives like 'Project Vault' and the 'Forge' forum signal a strategic shift toward a collaborative 'Metals NATO' model. To successfully compete with China’s predatory pricing, U.S. policy must prioritize early-stage project funding and high environmental and labor standards to attract producing nations. These coordinated efforts are vital for securing the resilient supply chains required for national security and the global energy transition.
-
251.
Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban have entered a state of 'open war' following lethal cross-border airstrikes triggered by Islamabad’s claims that Kabul is harboring Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants. The escalation has resulted in significant civilian casualties and the failure of mediation efforts by regional actors like Qatar and Saudi Arabia, marking the most severe breakdown in relations since 2021. The conflict threatens to destabilize China’s regional infrastructure projects and could provide operational space for extremist groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda. Consequently, the breakdown in bilateral ties may force regional powers, including India and Russia, to recalibrate their diplomatic strategies toward the Taliban regime.
-
252.
The UK government faces a widening fiscal gap in its defense budget, threatening the implementation of its 2025 Strategic Defence Review and commitments to NATO. Despite pledges to reach a 3.5% GDP spending target, the Ministry of Defence already contends with a £17 billion equipment funding deficit and potential cuts to major land and naval programs. Failure to reconcile these gaps through increased taxation or borrowing may force the UK to either abandon its nuclear capability or cede its status as Europe’s leading military power. The forthcoming Defence Investment Plan will be the ultimate test of whether Britain can realistically sustain its global security ambitions.
-
253.
Chatham House argues that Iran's long-standing 'forward defence' strategy has backfired, drawing the Islamic Republic into a direct and existential war with the U.S. and Israel. The systemic weakening of the 'axis of resistance'—marked by the fall of the Assad regime and significant losses for Hezbollah and Hamas—has collapsed the proxy-based shield Tehran used to avoid direct confrontation. As a result, Iran faces a severe degradation of its regional influence and must now manage a conflict on its own soil that it spent four decades trying to externalize. This strategic 'boomerang' likely necessitates a fundamental and painful reconfiguration of Iran’s national security doctrine.
-
254.
The Trump administration is executing a "maximum pressure" campaign against Cuba by choking off oil imports through naval interdictions and tariff threats against suppliers like Mexico, following the fall of the Maduro regime in Venezuela. This strategy has crippled Cuba’s power grid and essential services, pushing the island toward a potential "crash landing" as domestic legitimacy reaches an all-time low. While reports of back-channel talks between Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Castro family suggest a possible opening for a managed transition, the lack of a clear regime successor and strict U.S. legislative hurdles complicate a diplomatic exit. The situation represents a high-stakes gamble that risks a humanitarian catastrophe to force the end of communist rule.
-
255.Brexit was ‘a colossal mistake’, says President Stubb of Finland – but Europe should build a flexible partnership with the UK (Chatham House)
Finnish President Alexander Stubb contends that the EU and UK must abandon the 'punishment' mindset following Brexit to establish a pragmatic, flexible partnership. Citing shared values and the geopolitical pressure of an aggressive Russia, he advocates for closer ties in security, technology, and potential reintegration into the customs union or internal market. Stubb argues that European resilience depends on the UK’s voice in critical areas such as competition reform and climate change. This suggests a strategic shift toward 'flexible integration' to ensure regional stability and economic strength in a changing global order.
-
256.
Charles Kupchan argues that the Trump administration should pursue a strategy of neutralizing Iran's regime rather than attempting to topple it, advocating for an 'Islamic Republic 2.0' with moderate leadership and strict constraints on its nuclear, missile, and proxy capabilities. He draws on the disastrous outcomes of U.S.-led regime change in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria to warn that dismantling the Islamic Republic would likely produce state fracture, civil war, and regional instability rather than democracy. The article notes that Iran's deeply embedded security apparatus—over one million troops plus paramilitary forces—makes regime collapse unlikely through airpower alone, while arming ethnic minorities risks igniting a multi-country civil war. Kupchan recommends focusing military strikes on degrading Iran's military capability while maintaining diplomatic channels to pragmatic Iranian elites, arguing that a defanged regime, even if imperfect, is far preferable to the chaos of state collapse.
-
257.The Iran war is exacting a heavy toll on Gulf oil and gas exporters – and creating risk and opportunity in North Africa (Chatham House)
The US-Israeli conflict with Iran is severely disrupting Gulf energy exports through the Strait of Hormuz, forcing major producers to rely on insufficient and vulnerable alternative pipeline routes. This disruption is straining national budgets, especially in oil-dependent Iraq, and threatening the long-term market share of Gulf LNG as Asian buyers seek more reliable suppliers. In North Africa, the crisis presents a dual reality where energy importers like Egypt face significant inflationary pressures, while exporters like Algeria benefit from higher prices. These developments underscore the strategic fragility of the Gulf's economic model and may accelerate a permanent global shift in energy trade patterns and infrastructure.
-
258.AI wars: Anthropic battles the Pentagon as China plans ahead. Independent Thinking podcast (Chatham House)
This Chatham House podcast discusses the deepening rift between the Pentagon and AI provider Anthropic over the company's ethical restrictions on lethal autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. The dispute, which led to the firm being labeled a 'supply chain risk,' reveals a significant gap in global AI governance and the lack of established rules for AI in modern warfare. Meanwhile, China is rapidly advancing its 'AI Plus' initiative to integrate artificial intelligence across its entire economic and military infrastructure. These developments highlight a critical need for policy frameworks that balance national security requirements with technological ethics and international competition.
-
259.Kazakhstan referendum: The new constitution demonstrates a diminishing interest in Western values (Chatham House)
Kazakhstan’s comprehensive constitutional overhaul signals a strategic departure from Western liberal models in favor of a state-led, institutionalized authoritarian system similar to China’s. The amendments consolidate President Tokayev’s power and assert domestic law supremacy over international treaties, potentially undermining legal protections for foreign investors in the extractive sectors. While the reforms may strengthen national sovereignty against Russian influence, they also provide the state with greater leverage to restrict civil liberties and manage long-term political succession.
-
260.
Max Boot argues that Operation Epic Fury suffers from a critical "strategy gap," where tactical military successes—such as precision strikes on Iranian leadership—fail to achieve clear political objectives or a viable exit strategy. While the U.S. has degraded Iranian infrastructure, Tehran has successfully retaliated by closing the Strait of Hormuz and depleting American munitions stocks at an unsustainable rate. This rapid consumption of high-tech interceptors like Patriot missiles creates significant strategic vulnerabilities in other theaters, particularly regarding China and North Korea. Ultimately, the conflict underscores the limits of U.S. military power in translating tactical dominance into long-term political or economic stability.
-
261.Term Member and Young Professionals Screening and Discussion of "Jean Monnet, Europe’s Adventurer" (CFR)
This discussion of Jean Monnet’s legacy argues that his 'functionalist' method of building shared sovereignty through technical cooperation remains essential for revitalizing European integration and transatlantic stability. Panelists identified modern catalysts for unity, such as digital sovereignty and AI, while advocating for a 'pragmatic federalism' where smaller coalitions move forward on defense and diplomacy to bypass current EU institutional gridlock. The findings emphasize that the European project must return to Monnet's principle of transforming specific points of friction into common goods to address contemporary geopolitical threats and internal fragmentation.
-
262.
The article argues that the Iran conflict's disruption of Strait of Hormuz shipping poses a severe threat not only to energy markets but to global food security and water supply. Gulf states are nearly entirely import-dependent for staple grains, and the region accounts for roughly one-quarter of global fertilizer production transiting the strait—meaning price spikes and supply shortages will cascade worldwide, particularly in vulnerable nations already facing hunger crises. Iranian strikes on desalination infrastructure further endanger water access for over 100 million people in the Gulf. Drawing parallels to the Ukraine war's lasting fertilizer market disruption, which pushed 27 million more people into poverty, the author warns that the systematic weaponization of food, water, and fertilizer could convert a regional military conflict into a global humanitarian catastrophe, especially as rising defense spending crowds out development aid.
-
263.
Marion Messmer argues that international security is becoming increasingly volatile due to the proliferation of nuclear deterrence and the democratization of military technology like drones. She highlights how intangible advancements in AI and cyber-operations are reshaping the battlefield, making it harder to track adversaries and manage escalation. Ultimately, she suggests that while technology and non-state actors present significant new risks, incorporating diverse perspectives into the male-dominated security field is essential for building more resilient and durable peace.
-
264.
The article emphasizes that Belarus's strategic location makes it a critical factor in European security, arguing that transitioning the country from a Russian ally to a European asset would stabilize the region. It points to the 2022 invasion of Ukraine as evidence of how Russia exploits Belarusian territory to extend its military reach and threaten neighboring NATO members. While Lukashenka is currently tethered to Moscow for economic survival, his flexible foreign policy ideology suggests potential for shift if the West provides viable alternatives. Strategically, decoupling Belarus from the Kremlin's orbit would dismantle a major platform for Russian aggression in Eastern Europe.
-
265.
The Pentagon's designation of Anthropic as a national security supply chain risk—after the company refused to drop AI safety guardrails in its military contract—represents an unprecedented and legally dubious use of authorities designed to counter foreign adversaries like Huawei and Kaspersky. The article argues this retaliation undermines U.S. credibility, noting that OpenAI's own enforcement mechanism (the right to walk away) is effectively the same leverage Anthropic tried to exercise, and that no Chinese AI firm has received such a designation even as five major Chinese models launched in a single month. The author calls on Congress to legislate clear boundaries for military AI use rather than leaving terms to ad hoc contract negotiations, and urges the defense industry to break its silence, warning that acquiescence to executive overreach sets a precedent that will eventually be turned against every contractor in the ecosystem.
-
266.
As the conflict in Ukraine continues, the primary focus is shifting from active combat to the profound post-war challenges of societal recovery. The article argues that when the war concludes, both Ukraine and Russia will face the massive undertaking of reintegrating thousands of veterans. This process requires significant state resources to provide long-term physical, mental, and financial support to service members. Consequently, both Kyiv and Moscow must prioritize comprehensive policy planning and allocate substantial financial capital to manage these lasting societal wounds, ensuring stability and preventing internal crises.
-
267.
Russia is deepening its strategic alignment with Iran, formalizing a partnership aimed at resisting third-party interference. This growing axis is evidenced by the recent Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Treaty and Russia's largely non-interventionist stance during the US/Israeli attacks on Iran. This calculated inaction suggests Moscow views the conflict as an opportunity to challenge Western norms and solidify a powerful anti-Western bloc. Policymakers should anticipate increased regional instability and a more coordinated challenge to global security structures emanating from the Middle East.
-
268.
The analysis concludes that even if the Iranian regime survives the current conflict greatly weakened, it will remain a significant and dangerous regional threat. This persistence is due to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which holds the true coercive power, ensuring that the regime will prioritize maintaining the status quo over radical change. The leadership succession, whether through Mojtaba Khamenei or a successor, will be driven by vengeance and resistance, guaranteeing continued instability and potential for terrorism. Strategically, this suggests that external military intervention is unlikely to achieve a swift regime collapse, necessitating a long-term strategy focused on managing persistent regional volatility.
-
269.
The escalating military conflict between the US, Israel, and Iran introduces significant geopolitical variables that could fundamentally alter the trajectory of the war in Ukraine. Analysts suggest that a protracted US entanglement in the Middle East risks diverting critical resources and diplomatic focus away from Kyiv, potentially fracturing Western unity. Conversely, while regional instability might weaken Russia's strategic partnership with Iran, surging oil prices could provide Moscow with a vital financial cushion to sustain its offensive despite international sanctions.
-
270.
Global military AI adoption is rapidly outstripping international efforts to establish governance, as evidenced by a significant decline in endorsements at the recent REAIM summit. With the United States and China increasingly detached from multilateral dialogues, middle powers now face the critical choice of leading the development of 'rules of the road' or allowing the technology to evolve without international guardrails. The divergence between diplomatic negotiations and the real-world deployment of AI in ongoing conflicts risks making future policy efforts irrelevant to technical and battlefield realities.
-
271.
This CFR report outlines the catastrophic collapse of U.S.-Iran relations, culminating in a massive joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign in February 2026. Following failed nuclear talks and the failure of 'maximum pressure' sanctions, the conflict escalated to direct strikes that killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and targeted Iran's nuclear and naval assets. These events have triggered immediate regional retaliation, including Iranian strikes on U.S. Gulf bases and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, presenting a severe threat to global energy stability and risking a broader regional war.
-
272.
The Mitchell Institute asserts that space superiority is a foundational requirement for U.S. military operations, currently threatened by advancing Chinese and Russian counterspace capabilities. To mitigate these risks, the paper argues that the Department of Defense must clarify institutional roles and prioritize cross-domain investments to improve the survivability of the U.S. space architecture. Furthermore, the institute recommends a cultural shift towards treating space as a true warfighting domain, necessitating the integration of contested space scenarios into major military training exercises. These reforms are considered urgent to ensure the United States can maintain its strategic advantage in a linchpin domain.
-
273.
European leaders have responded in a fragmented manner to the uncoordinated U.S.-Israeli military strikes on Iran, revealing deep internal divisions regarding the use of force and international law. While countries like Poland and Germany offer political or conditional support, France and Southern European nations have voiced legal criticisms, highlighting a lack of unified strategic weight. The conflict underscores Europe's continued dependence on the United States even as it pursues greater autonomy through increased defense spending and independent financial support for Ukraine. Ultimately, the war in the Middle East threatens to distract Washington from the European theater and disrupt energy markets, further straining the transatlantic relationship.
-
274.
Brookings experts argue that the U.S.-Israeli decapitation strike against Iran’s leadership is unlikely to trigger an immediate regime collapse, risking instead a protracted conflict and regional instability. The analysis highlights the resilience of the Islamic Republic's institutional networks and its escalatory survival strategy, which targets neighboring energy infrastructure to force diplomatic concessions. Policymakers are warned that without a coherent 'day after' plan or the integration of civilian statecraft, the intervention could lead to a 'lose-lose' scenario of state fragmentation and emboldened global adversaries.
-
275.
The article argues that the United States' primary competitive advantage in AI lies in developing 'trust infrastructure'—credible assurance frameworks like independent validation and incident reporting—which enables confident large-scale deployment. By drawing on historical precedents in aviation and finance, the author posits that these mechanisms turn technical risks into manageable market assets, allowing the US to set global standards that allies can trust. Strategic implications suggest that the US must establish an integrated framework involving independent benchmarking and federal incident repositories within the next three years to prevent global market fragmentation. Establishing this infrastructure will ensure that American AI remains the global benchmark for high-stakes applications in health, finance, and national security.
-
276.
The joint U.S.-Israeli strikes against Iran and the subsequent death of Supreme Leader Khamenei have turned the Strait of Hormuz into a volatile maritime flashpoint, severely threatening global energy markets. In response to Iranian retaliation and threats of a blockade, vessel traffic through the waterway has dropped by 70%, causing Brent crude and natural gas prices to surge. While U.S. military operations have significantly degraded Iran's formal naval capacity, the continued use of asymmetric tactics like drone strikes and mine-laying forces expensive shipping diversions. This escalation highlights the fragility of regional maritime security and the immediate risk of a broader conflict disrupting essential global trade routes.
-
277.
The ongoing conflict with Iran significantly raises the risk of asymmetric retaliation against the U.S. homeland, encompassing lone-wolf terrorism, cyberattacks, and strikes on critical infrastructure. Historically, Tehran has utilized sleeper agents and criminal proxies for state-sponsored terrorism, suggesting that revenge for recent strikes may be deferred until high-profile events like the World Cup. However, U.S. defensive capabilities are currently strained by the Department of Homeland Security's shift toward immigration enforcement and significant workforce cuts in specialized counterintelligence units. Consequently, experts urge an immediate re-prioritization of counterterrorism resources to address these evolving unconventional security threats.
-
278.
The military conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran has severely disrupted energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz, threatening twenty percent of global oil and gas supplies and disproportionately impacting Asian economies. While nations like Japan are buffered by significant strategic reserves, others like India face immediate risks due to limited storage and recent shifts in import patterns. Ultimately, these supply shocks are expected to drive a temporary resurgence in coal usage for affordability while simultaneously accelerating long-term strategic investments in nuclear and renewable energy to ensure national security and reduce reliance on volatile Middle Eastern transit routes.
-
279.
The joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran have triggered a major, destabilizing escalation, pushing the region toward a protracted conflagration. Experts argue that Iran's retaliatory strikes were a calculated, existential move, demonstrating a willingness to engage in a long conflict by targeting soft underbellies, such as Gulf neighbors and American assets. This strategy allows Iran to gamble that it can outlast the current U.S. political administration. For policy, the primary implication is managing the risk of regional spillover, mitigating domestic economic fallout, and navigating the highly decentralized and politically charged nature of U.S. decision-making regarding the conflict.
-
280.
Ambassador Robert Blackwill proposes a "resolute global leadership" grand strategy that fuses superior military primacy with a muscular revitalization of the rules-based international order. He argues that recent liberal internationalism proved too passive against adversaries like China and Russia, while the transactional "Trumpism" approach dangerously abandons the alliances and moral frameworks essential to U.S. security. To restore influence, the report advocates for a significant increase in the defense budget, winning the AI technology race, and pivoting military resources to Asia to deter Chinese hegemony.
-
281.
European leaders at the 2026 CFR symposium characterized the war in Ukraine as a generational conflict that has fundamentally transformed Russia into a direct, long-term threat to the continent. To maintain support amidst uncertain U.S. funding, European nations are aggressively increasing defense spending and industrial capacity while fostering Ukraine’s own domestic military-industrial base. Strategic priorities have shifted toward 'strategic autonomy' within NATO, emphasizing robust security guarantees and the deep integration of Ukraine into Western institutions to ensure a durable peace. The panel concluded that European security now depends on transitioning from security consumption to active partnership through sustained military and economic commitment.
-
282.
Marking the fourth anniversary of the full-scale invasion, this analysis highlights that Russia’s military efforts have devolved into a slow-moving war of attrition characterized by unprecedented casualties (1.2 million) and a stagnating economy. Despite minimal territorial gains, Russia has intensified its drone campaign, while Ukraine faces a staggering $588 billion reconstruction challenge and a vulnerable centralized energy grid. Crucially, the financial burden of military support is shifting from the U.S. to Europe, requiring new procurement mechanisms like the Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List (PURL) to sustain Ukraine’s defense.
-
283.Beyond Conventional Aid: Institutionalizing Public-Private Partnership in Ukraine’s Humanitarian Response (CFR)
The report argues that Ukraine's humanitarian response faces a critical gap due to massive international funding cuts and the inherent bureaucratic slowness of the United Nations system. It highlights that while the UN excels at resource mobilization, it lacks the flexibility of local NGOs or the now-defunct USAID Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) to respond quickly to shifting frontline needs. To bridge this gap, the author proposes a new public-private partnership mechanism that institutionalizes OTI’s agile grant model while integrating specialized private-sector capabilities. This strategic pivot is deemed essential for maintaining aid effectiveness as the conflict evolves and eventually transitions toward long-term reconstruction.
-
284.
As the Russia-Ukraine war enters its fifth year, a panel of CFR experts argues that Europe must transition from emergency response to a long-term, self-reliant security and recovery architecture. The recommendations emphasize integrating Ukraine’s innovative defense industrial base into European supply chains and preparing for overt Russian provocations that may require European action independent of U.S. support. Strategically, this necessitates balancing robust military deterrence with diplomatic dialogue and modernizing humanitarian aid through agile public-private partnerships to ensure regional stability during and after the conflict.
-
285.
Ukraine’s trajectory from 1991 to 2026 demonstrates a persistent struggle for independence defined by Russian military aggression and a shifting international security architecture. Milestones such as the 1994 Budapest Memorandum and the 2022 invasion highlight the failure of early security guarantees, leading to a war of attrition with combined casualties reaching an estimated 1.8 million by early 2026. Recent developments indicate a pivot toward bilateral U.S.-Russia peace summits that often exclude Ukrainian representation, creating a strategic tension between continued Western military support and great-power diplomacy. Ultimately, the ongoing targeting of energy infrastructure and deadlocked negotiations suggest that Ukraine's sovereignty remains precarious despite sustained G7 and NATO commitments.
-
286.
CFR analysts argue that Western policymakers must immediately begin planning for a post-settlement Europe, as a ceasefire in Ukraine will not eliminate Russia's long-term security threat but rather shift it toward hybrid warfare and military testing of NATO cohesion. Potential risks include deepening transatlantic friction over sanctions relief and commercial normalization with Moscow, alongside intra-European disputes regarding defense burden-sharing. To mitigate these threats, the report recommends a G7-coordinated Russia strategy, a revitalized 'Harmel-style' NATO blueprint for dual-track deterrence, and the implementation of new Europe-wide risk reduction measures to stabilize the expanded NATO-Russia border.
-
287.
The article argues that Ukraine is facing intense pressure to make painful territorial concessions to achieve peace, citing proposals from the Trump administration. Key evidence includes draft peace agreements demanding that Kyiv recognize Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk as Russian territory, reflecting the current military realities on the ground. While President Zelensky resists these terms to protect national integrity, the pressure suggests that future policy decisions for Ukraine must navigate a difficult balance between maintaining sovereignty and achieving a stable, albeit compromised, peace.
-
288.
This CFR event centered on the documentary 'Atomic Echoes,' which examines the multi-generational human and health consequences of the 1945 atomic bombings for both Japanese survivors and American 'atomic veterans.' The discussion highlighted how historical classification and the focus on strategic deterrence often obscure the long-term trauma and radiation-related illnesses suffered by individuals on both sides of the conflict. Policy implications include the urgent need to address the erosion of international nuclear guardrails following the expiration of treaties like New START and the rising risk of inadvertent escalation. Panelists emphasized that human-centered narratives are essential for engaging the public in contemporary debates over nuclear modernization and the sole authority of the executive branch in weapon deployment.
-
289.
The Supreme Court's ruling in Learning Resources Inc. v. Trump invalidated the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) for broad tariffs, reasserting that the power to raise revenue resides with Congress under the Taxing Clause. While the decision eliminates the administration’s primary tool for immediate, open-ended duties, Brookings experts note that significant economic uncertainty persists as the executive branch pivots to alternative authorities like Sections 122, 232, and 301. This shift may force more deliberate, evidence-based trade investigations and increase legislative accountability, yet it also threatens to exacerbate federal deficits and complicate relations with key allies in Europe and the Indo-Pacific.
-
290.
As the US scales back military support and pressures Ukraine for a quick peace settlement, European nations are stepping up to replace the US as Ukraine's primary donor and security guarantor. Kyiv faces significant domestic pressure against territorial concessions, while European allies are 'Trump-proofing' support through massive financial aid, new procurement mechanisms, and direct investment in Ukraine's defense industrial base. This strategic shift integrates Ukraine into Europe’s security architecture and leverages battlefield innovations, such as low-cost drone production, to sustain Ukraine's long-term defensive capabilities. Consequently, Europe's proactive role is essential for ensuring Ukraine can resist coercive diplomacy and negotiate from a position of strength.
-
291.
Four years after Russia's full-scale invasion, Ukraine's grain exports remain 35% below pre-war levels due to extensive landmine contamination, destroyed irrigation infrastructure, and acute labor shortages. While Russia initially surged to dominate 22% of the global wheat market by weaponizing appropriated Ukrainian land and infrastructure, its own production is now threatened by adverse weather and a shrinking agricultural workforce. Despite a decline from the 2022 price peak, global food security remains fragile as the war continues to suppress the output of a top producer, limiting the market's ability to absorb future shocks. Strategic recovery for Ukraine necessitates rapid EU integration, modernization of decentralized export logistics, and enhanced maritime defense to secure Black Sea trade routes.
-
292.
This retrospective analyzes the legacy of John Foster Dulles, a central figure in 1950s U.S. foreign policy known for his doctrines of 'massive retaliation,' 'brinkmanship,' and 'rollback.' While Dulles provided the bold moral and rhetorical framework for American exceptionalism during the Cold War, historical evidence suggests President Eisenhower maintained ultimate control over policy decisions, often opting for caution over Dulles's aggressive stances. The article also highlights the damaging long-term effects of Dulles’s purge of State Department experts on U.S. diplomatic intelligence and regional expertise.
-
293.
A 6-3 U.S. Supreme Court ruling striking down tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) has created significant trade policy volatility, forcing the White House to pivot to Section 122 authorities to maintain levies. Key trading partners including India, Malaysia, and Indonesia are responding by delaying the ratification or implementation of trade deals originally negotiated under the shadow of the now-illegal tariffs. While the decision offers a temporary legal check on executive trade power, the administration's immediate recourse to alternative authorities indicates a sustained period of trade friction and damaged diplomatic leverage in future economic negotiations.
-
294.
This Brookings report finds that the Trump administration’s second-term China strategy has produced significant rhetoric but few measurable results after one year. Key economic indicators like manufacturing employment and industrial production remain stagnant despite high-profile investment pledges, while U.S. global standing among allies has declined sharply. In technology, inconsistent export controls and infrastructure bottlenecks are straining America’s lead in AI against a more self-sufficient Chinese ecosystem. Consequently, the administration must shift from transactional signaling to sustained policy execution and alliance rebuilding to effectively reduce strategic dependencies and counter Beijing's influence.
-
295.Assessing Xi’s Unprecedented Purges of China’s Military: Key Developments and Potential Implications (CSIS)
Xi Jinping has conducted an unprecedented purge of the People's Liberation Army (PLA), removing over 100 senior officers and nearly decapitating the Central Military Commission to ensure absolute political loyalty. This campaign has created a significant leadership void, with approximately 52% of top positions impacted, severely undermining the PLA's near-term readiness for complex military operations like a Taiwan invasion. While the purges disrupt immediate capabilities, they enable Xi to replace the 'old guard' with a younger, more technically literate generation of 'intelligentized' officers. Long-term implications include a potentially more aggressive military that is ideologically subservient, though at a heightened risk of strategic miscalculation due to the suppression of realistic operational advice.
-
296.
The global dominance of U.S. cloud "hyperscalers" is increasingly viewed by international partners as an untenable strategic vulnerability rather than a commercial convenience. Following the weaponization of digital infrastructure against Russia and the Trump administration's perceived erratic foreign policy, nations like India and the Netherlands are accelerating efforts to build sovereign cloud platforms to reduce American dependence. This erosion of trust threatens long-term U.S. digital influence and may cede market share to Chinese competitors as allies prioritize technological autonomy over the cost-efficiency of American platforms.
-
297.
Four years after Russia's invasion, the conflict has evolved into a long-term war of attrition that requires a transition from short-term aid to a generational strategy for European security. Despite significant casualties and sanctions, Russia has maintained its war effort through economic ties with China and the Global South, while Ukraine has successfully shifted toward deeper defense industrial cooperation with European partners. Experts suggest that because Russia's maximalist goals remain unchanged, Western policymakers must prepare for a multiyear struggle focused on conventional deterrence and cautious escalation management.
-
298.
As the Russia-Ukraine war enters its fifth year, the conflict has evolved into a protracted struggle characterized by stalled U.S.-led peace efforts and a strategic shift toward European leadership in military support. High-intensity fighting has resulted in over 465,000 total casualties and a projected $588 billion reconstruction cost, highlighting the severe long-term impact on regional energy infrastructure and economic stability. This transition toward a European-led 'Coalition of the Willing' reflects a pivot in great-power dynamics, suggesting that future conflicts will require sustained societal mobilization and resilient regional alliances.
-
299.
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA), ruling that the statute does not grant the executive branch the authority to levy duties. The Court reasoned that the Constitution reserves taxing powers for Congress and that IEEPA’s power to 'regulate' imports is distinct from the power to tax. Consequently, the administration has pivoted to Section 122 for temporary 150-day tariffs while launching 'expedited' Section 301 investigations to secure a longer-term legal foundation for its trade agenda. This shift highlights a significant constitutional reinforcement of congressional authority, even as the executive maintains protectionist policies through alternative statutory frameworks.
-
300.
President Trump’s State of the Union address prioritized domestic economic issues and immigration while framing his 'peace through strength' doctrine as a success in stabilizing global conflicts. He defended the continuation of tariffs despite judicial setbacks and highlighted the recognition of a new interim government in Venezuela as a major shift in Western Hemisphere policy. These developments suggest an administration focused on transactional diplomacy and protectionist economic measures, emphasizing increased burden-sharing from both international allies and domestic technology firms.
-
301.Ukrainian ambassador Valerii Zaluzhnyi says future wars will require ‘technological alliances, not treaty articles’ (Chatham House)
Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Ukraine’s Ambassador to the UK, argues that future warfare will be defined by autonomous robotic systems, necessitating international 'technological alliances' over traditional treaty frameworks. He emphasizes that no single nation can master all critical military technologies, requiring a collective approach to counter threats and ensure military effectiveness with fewer casualties. To secure victory, Zaluzhnyi advocates for sustained economic pressure to push Russia's economy to a breaking point, highlighting a strategic shift toward technology-sharing and economic attrition as primary tools of modern defense.
-
302.
The United States is entering an increasingly dangerous nuclear era as Russia and China simultaneously modernize and expand their arsenals, presenting the unprecedented challenge of facing two nuclear peers. The collapse of the New START treaty has removed critical constraints on strategic forces, while regional instabilities in Iran and the Korean Peninsula further exacerbate the threat environment. These developments are placing immense strain on U.S. extended deterrence commitments and raising risks of allied nuclear proliferation. Consequently, policymakers must urgently reassess foundational assumptions regarding nuclear posture, modernization, and the integration of emerging defense technologies like the "Golden Dome" missile system.
-
303.Securing Ukraine’s Future in Europe: Ukraine's Defense Industrial Base—An Anchor for Economic Renewal and European Security (CFR)
Ukraine’s defense industrial base (DIB) has transformed from a wartime survival mechanism into a high-tech pillar of European security and a central driver for the country's postwar economic renewal. Driven by a 100-fold increase in defense-tech investment and the production of millions of drones, the sector is pivoting toward industrial-scale exports and coproduction models with European allies. The establishment of Ukrainian defense export centers across Europe signals a shift from aid dependency to strategic partnership, aiming to synchronize regulatory standards and attract private venture capital. Successfully integrating this mil-tech ecosystem will require Western policy support for joint certification and risk-sharing to overcome domestic governance hurdles and maximize Europe's collective deterrence.
-
304.
Total U.S. aid to Ukraine reached $188 billion by late 2025, though no new aid legislation has been passed since April 2024, leading European contributions to collectively surpass U.S. support. While the Trump administration continues to deliver previously appropriated funds and facilitates third-party weapon transfers via the PURL program, it has shifted the U.S. stance toward acting as an impartial peace broker. This development underscores a significant pivot in transatlantic burden-sharing and suggests a potential winding down of direct American military assistance.
-
305.
This brief warns that Europe must prepare to independently counter potential low-level Russian conventional attacks, such as drone strikes, as Moscow may exploit declining transatlantic trust to undermine NATO's collective defense. The authors argue that Russia's shift from hybrid 'gray zone' tactics to overt provocations could expose a perceived lack of U.S. reliability, particularly as Washington prioritizes securing a Ukraine peace deal. To mitigate this risk, European governments are urged to establish autonomous command structures, develop independent response menus in coordination with Ukraine, and rapidly bolster native air defense and intelligence capabilities.
-
306.
The Supreme Court’s ruling that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize presidential tariffs strips the administration of its most flexible geoeconomic weapon, forcing a shift toward more bureaucratic trade authorities. Experts suggest the executive branch will likely invoke Section 122 for temporary 150-day tariffs while initiating formal investigations under Sections 301 and 232 to reconstruct the previous tariff regime. This transition creates significant business uncertainty regarding potential refunds and trade agreement stability, and may paradoxically lead to a more aggressive use of alternative tools like export controls and financial sanctions.
-
307.
Veteran journalist Alan Cullison argues that effective foreign policy reporting and analysis must be grounded in human empathy and the study of individual personalities rather than abstract political theory. Drawing on three decades of experience in Russia and Afghanistan, Cullison demonstrates how focusing on the 'fragments' of conflict—such as personal tragedies or investigative leads like liberated al-Qaeda hard drives—provides deeper insights into geopolitical shifts than conventional high-level reporting. For policymakers and analysts, these reflections highlight that robust intelligence depends on maintaining a diverse ecosystem of 'honest interpreters' who possess the linguistic and cultural immersion necessary to navigate chaotic international environments.
-
308.
Stephen M. Walt argues that the current American foreign policy constitutes "predatory hegemony," wherein the U.S. uses its overwhelming power to extract short-term concessions and tribute from both allies and rivals in a zero-sum manner. This aggressive shift is presented as a reaction to the perceived failures and excesses of the post-Cold War unipolar order. The reliance on tactics like tariffs and threats, rather than traditional diplomatic restraint, is fundamentally eroding America's long-term global power and stability. Consequently, the article warns that medium powers must cooperate among themselves to defend their interests and seek a more equitable partnership with the United States.
-
309.
Max Boot argues that the Trump administration must heed military warnings regarding the high risks of a sustained conflict with Iran, which poses far greater dangers than previous limited strikes. Key concerns include potential Iranian attacks on regional oil infrastructure, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and a critical depletion of U.S. precision-guided munitions required for other global theaters like China and Russia. Additionally, the author notes that extended naval deployments are straining military readiness while a lack of regional ally support complicates any exit strategy. Consequently, a prolonged conflict could severely weaken U.S. strategic posture and global economic stability without guaranteed regime concessions.
-
310.
The war in Ukraine has inaugurated a new era of 'precise mass' warfare, characterized by the deployment of millions of low-cost autonomous drones that are reshaping the battlefield and blurring traditional front lines. Key evidence includes Ukraine's rapid production of millions of drones and the critical role of Silicon Valley firms in providing AI and satellite connectivity, which often bypasses traditional, slower defense procurement cycles. These developments imply that the U.S. and its allies must urgently adapt their defense industrial bases to prioritize both high-volume production and rapid innovation while managing the strategic risks associated with private sector control of essential military technologies.
-
311.
Flash droughts are rapidly intensifying climate events that represent a new systemic risk because their speed collapses traditional warning timelines and overwhelms existing drought governance frameworks. These events, which have increased in frequency since the 1950s, cause disproportionate damage to agriculture and energy security, as seen in the 2012 U.S. losses and the 2010 Russian heatwave that triggered global food price spikes. To mitigate these risks, policymakers must establish flash droughts as a distinct category, leveraging high-resolution satellite data and anticipatory financing to trigger interventions before losses become inevitable.
-
312.
This CFR guide outlines the 'America First' transformation of U.S. foreign policy during the first year of President Trump’s second term, emphasizing a shift toward unilateralism and aggressive economic nationalism. Key developments highlighted include the 2025 National Security Strategy's focus on regional dominance, the military capture of Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro, and significant withdrawals from international organizations and climate agreements. These policies have strained traditional alliances while prioritizing U.S. resource access and domestic border security over global humanitarian assistance. Ultimately, the administration's approach suggests a future of transactional global engagement and a preference for military-backed regime change over multilateral diplomacy.
-
313.
The State of the Union address is a foundational U.S. constitutional tradition that has evolved from a formal written report into a high-stakes televised event used to define presidential agendas. Historical data indicates that while the complexity of the speech's prose has decreased to reach a wider audience, actual television viewership has declined sharply over recent decades. Nonetheless, the address remains a critical mechanism for presidents to fulfill constitutional obligations and announce major foreign policy doctrines during periods of international instability.
-
314.
George Kennan’s 1946 'Long Telegram' and subsequent 'X Article' established the foundational strategy of containment that defined U.S. foreign policy for four decades. He argued that Soviet expansionism was driven by internal ideological dynamics rather than external incentives, necessitating a firm, long-term counterforce to Russian encroachment. Beyond military might, Kennan emphasized that successfully containing the Soviet threat required the United States to maintain a healthy, vibrant, and spiritually vital domestic society. This strategy ultimately guided the U.S. to victory in the Cold War by managing geopolitical competition until the Soviet Union's collapse in 1991.
-
315.
Sudan is currently enduring the world’s largest internal displacement and hunger crisis, with over twelve million people forced from their homes following more than two years of civil war between the SAF and RSF. The conflict has escalated toward a de facto partition of the country, marked by the RSF's capture of Darfur and widespread reports of ethnically driven genocide. Strategic implications include heightened regional instability as neighboring countries struggle with refugee inflows and external powers continue to fuel the violence through arms and financing. With humanitarian appeals severely underfunded due to international budget cuts, the crisis risks becoming a permanent humanitarian catastrophe of historic proportions.
-
316.
Chatham House argues that Europe’s far-right parties are reframing themselves as pragmatic “realists” and are no longer fringe actors, with growing influence over mainstream policy agendas. The discussion highlights how their electoral rise is already shifting debates on migration, sovereignty, climate policy, and the EU’s strategic direction, even before full control of government. It reasons that if multiple major European states were governed by populists at once, the core uncertainty is whether they would moderate in office or intensify nationalist positions. The policy implication is that European governments and institutions should prepare for stress on cohesion, including weaker alignment on Ukraine and climate, more difficult UK-EU coordination, and stronger need for organized democratic counter-mobilization.
-
317.
The panel argues that while central bank independence (CBI) is increasingly challenged by high public debt and political populism, it remains essential for anchoring inflation expectations and maintaining price stability. Experts highlight that 'fiscal dominance' in high-debt environments increases political pressure to lower interest rates, particularly in the US, risking a return to 1970s-style inflation volatility. To maintain legitimacy, central banks must improve transparency and adapt to a new era of frequent supply shocks—such as AI and geopolitical shifts—which may drive higher neutral interest rates globally. Consequently, failure to safeguard CBI could lead to financial repression and a fragmentation of the global monetary regime.
-
318.
Chatham House argues that Assad’s abrupt fall in December 2024 revealed Syria’s state fragility, the limited capacity of Iran and Russia to sustain him, and the strategic failure of past Western policy. It reasons that Syria’s transition will be shaped by neighboring states—especially Turkey, Jordan, Israel, and Lebanon—which see both security risks and geopolitical openings as a new government seeks reconstruction support. The analysis highlights Lebanon’s governance stress from Hezbollah’s weakening after conflict with Israel, and Jordan’s added vulnerability as U.S. policy under President Donald Trump may intensify West Bank dynamics. Policy strategy should therefore prioritize a genuinely Syrian-led political transition, disciplined regional burden-sharing, and early safeguards against spillover instability in Lebanon and Jordan while avoiding prior external policy mistakes.
-
319.Venezuela, oil and order: What now for regional security after the US seizes Maduro? (Chatham House)
The panel argues that the U.S. seizure of Maduro marks a broader shift to explicit hemispheric power politics, where Washington is willing to use force based on narrowly defined national interests rather than traditional multilateral norms. Speakers contend that while the operation was tactically successful, it does not resolve Venezuela’s underlying governance, corruption, and institutional collapse, making durable stabilization and democratic transition highly uncertain. They also stress that the oil rationale is weak: Venezuela’s heavy crude, degraded infrastructure, legal uncertainty, and soft global demand make rapid production recovery costly and commercially unattractive, while disruption to China is likely limited. Strategically, the event signals a more fragmented Latin America, pressures partners into pragmatic bilateral bargaining with the U.S., and suggests policymakers should prioritize scenario planning for follow-on interventions, institutional reconstruction pathways, and tighter coordination among non-U.S. actors to preserve regional sovereignty and stability.
-
320.
The panel’s core judgment is that MENA is showing “stabilization in name only”: open wars are partly contained, but underlying drivers of conflict are intensifying. Speakers pointed to converging internal and external pressure on Iran, a Gaza ceasefire that is effectively fragile and incomplete, renewed Saudi-UAE competition (including in Yemen), and Syria’s unsettled political order with Turkey-Israel rivalry layered on top. They also argued that a fragmented global system is producing multi-alignment rather than clear blocs, with licit and illicit financial networks blurring traditional binaries and complicating sanctions and governance. The strategic implication is that regional and Western policymakers should move beyond ad hoc conflict management toward coordinated, multi-actor political processes, while preparing for cross-border spillovers (security, migration, and economic disruption) if current flashpoints reignite.
-
321.Defending NATO’s eastern flank: How Romania is responding to Russian aggression and European rearmament (Chatham House)
The event argues that Romania has become a pivotal frontline state in defending NATO’s eastern flank as Russia’s war against Ukraine reshapes European security. It points to Romania’s exposure to nearby Russian drone incidents, intensified information warfare, and Black Sea military operations, alongside NATO’s decision to host its largest base on Romanian territory, as evidence of its strategic centrality. Romania’s foreign minister frames continued support for Ukraine, defense modernization, and sustained military investment as core to deterrence and alliance resilience. The policy implication is that European rearmament must accelerate and remain coordinated, especially if US engagement in Europe becomes less reliable, to credibly deter further Russian coercion.
-
322.
The 2026 Munich Security Conference highlighted a stark divergence between the U.S. administration’s "civilizational" vision and a European counter-vision, prominently led by women, which emphasizes democratic values and increased defense autonomy. While U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio promoted an alliance based on shared Christian heritage and supported illiberal leaders, European figures like Kaja Kallas and Ursula von der Leyen pushed for EU enlargement, increased military spending, and a stronger independent security framework. This rift is accelerating Europe's transition toward strategic self-sufficiency and the potential strengthening of EU mutual defense clauses as a backstop to NATO. Consequently, the transatlantic relationship faces a transformative period where Europe’s agency and commitment to democratic norms increasingly challenge the traditional U.S.-led security architecture.
-
323.
The article argues that NATO is entering a structural shift: many Europeans now define “doing more” as long-term strategic autonomy, while the US still expects greater European spending within US-led command, planning, and procurement frameworks. It supports this with evidence of collapsing European trust in the US, strong public backing for deeper EU military integration, and concrete moves such as oversubscribed EU defense funding instruments and tighter regional cooperation. Although Europe still faces near-term capability and coordination gaps, the author says current rearmament and political momentum are unlikely to reverse even if US politics change. The policy implication is that Washington and NATO need explicit planning for a more independent Europe now, or face growing alliance friction over command, capabilities, and defense-industrial choices.
-
324.
CFR argues that Trump’s State of the Union is primarily a political reset attempt as he faces low approval, difficult midterm dynamics, and skepticism that presidential rhetoric can quickly shift opinion. The article cites weak polling, slowing GDP growth, persistent goods-trade deficits, and a Supreme Court ruling curbing his use of IEEPA tariffs, leaving narrower options such as Section 122. It also flags major foreign-policy pressure points—Iran, Venezuela, China, NATO, Ukraine, and Gaza—where his messaging may signal priorities but not resolve underlying constraints. The key strategic implication is that while the speech can shape partisan narratives, policy outcomes will be driven more by legal limits on executive trade tools, electoral pressures, and high-risk security decisions that may outpace congressional checks.
-
325.China’s Struggle for Influence in Central Asia. How is Beijing aiming to reshape the region? (Chatham House)
Chatham House argues that China’s expansion in Central Asia is not a linear success story but a contested process shaped by local resistance and regional power politics. The event framing points to grassroots protests, elite pushback, and Beijing’s need to adjust its economic and security approach, while Central Asian states actively hedge between China, Russia, the United States, the EU, and Turkey. It also highlights potential friction around China’s growing security role and asks whether renewed U.S. attention can translate into durable influence. For policymakers, the core implication is that strategy in Central Asia must account for local agency and competitive balancing dynamics, rather than assuming Beijing can unilaterally remake the region.
-
326.
The United States should 'leapfrog' China’s critical mineral dominance by prioritizing disruptive innovation, waste recovery, and recycling instead of attempting to out-mine or out-process China's entrenched capacity. The report argues that traditional mining projects are too slow to mitigate immediate geopolitical risks, whereas breakthroughs in materials science and AI-enabled extraction from industrial waste offer faster, more resilient paths to independence. Key policy recommendations include launching a national innovation strategy, bridging financing gaps for deep-tech startups, and coordinating with G7 allies to secure circular mineral supply chains.
-
327.
CFR argues that Trump’s second-term trade strategy is not a single tariff reset but a rolling, country-by-country restructuring of U.S. trade relations through mostly nonbinding framework deals. The tracker shows that while Liberation Day tariffs set high baselines, subsequent bilateral agreements and exemptions lowered effective rates unevenly and exchanged tariff relief for market-access concessions, purchase pledges, investment commitments, and alignment with U.S. economic-security measures. It also finds these deals are highly flexible and unilateral in design, with weak legal durability, quick-termination provisions, and little congressional constraint, making them closer to instruments of leverage than traditional trade agreements. The policy implication is a less predictable global trade environment where partners must continuously bargain with Washington and balance access to the U.S. market against sovereignty costs and geopolitical exposure, especially vis-a-vis China.
-
328.
The discussion argues that 2026 conflict risk will be shaped less by traditional multilateral conflict management and more by sphere-of-influence politics and transactional dealmaking by major powers. Ero’s reasoning is that with over 60 active conflicts, institutions like the UN and established mediators are increasingly sidelined, while regional and great-power actors (e.g., the US in Latin America, Gulf states in Sudan, Turkey in Syria, China in Myanmar) now carry more leverage over war and peace outcomes. She stresses that many current “peace” efforts are short-term truces rather than durable settlements, with places like Gaza, Sudan, and Somalia exposed to continued violence due to proxy competition, weak governance arrangements, and miscalculation risks among powerful states. For policy strategy, the implication is to prioritize pragmatic coalition-building with the actors who actually hold leverage, convert ceasefires into longer political processes, and adapt conflict-prevention tools to a more fragmented, law-weaker international order.
-
329.
Maddox argues that the international system has shifted into destabilizing US-China superpower rivalry, with both powers undermining global peace and prosperity in different ways. She contends that Washington’s transactional unilateralism under Trump and Beijing’s coercive techno-industrial expansion have together weakened alliances, eroded legal norms, and increased risks of conflict, including over Taiwan and transatlantic security. The lecture supports this with examples including tariff coercion, pressure over critical minerals, intensified military signaling, and challenges to institutions such as NATO, the UN system, and global trade mechanisms. Strategically, she calls on non-superpower states to strengthen and build institutions, resolve regional conflicts through principled coalitions, and actively uphold international law to preserve a rules-based order without relying on US leadership.
-
330.
CFR reports that the White House is ending a large immigration enforcement surge in Minnesota after intense backlash, even as the administration says it remains committed to mass deportations. The drawdown follows allegations of due-process violations, aggressive tactics, and the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens, with DHS still claiming thousands of arrests and no full public accounting yet of all detainees. Evidence in the piece suggests the shift is tactical rather than strategic: personnel are being reassigned, not a broader rollback of interior enforcement, and CBP as well as ICE have expanded domestic operations. For policymakers, this raises a near-term tradeoff between enforcement intensity and political/legal sustainability, with DHS funding negotiations likely to hinge on oversight, transparency, and limits on warrantless or masked operations.
-
331.
Chatham House frames Hungary’s 12 April 2026 election as a pivotal contest for both Hungary and the EU, with the potential to alter Europe’s political trajectory. The core argument is that Viktor Orbán’s long rule—marked by hardline migration policy, weakened judicial independence, and closer ties with Russia—has created sustained conflict with Brussels and concerns about democratic backsliding. The event highlights Péter Magyar and the TISZA movement as Orbán’s strongest challenger in years, citing polling that suggests a plausible upset and a pro-EU, centrist alternative. Strategically, the outcome could either reinforce Hungary’s current sovereigntist path or trigger a policy reset toward EU alignment, with spillover effects on the momentum of right-leaning populist forces across Europe.
-
332.As the UK lurches from crisis to crisis, is it becoming ungovernable? Independent Thinking podcast (Chatham House)
The podcast argues that the UK’s repeated political crises and rapid prime-ministerial turnover may reflect deeper structural governance weaknesses rather than isolated leadership problems. It points to six prime ministers in roughly a decade, ongoing pressure on Keir Starmer’s government, and Labour’s exposure in upcoming local elections as signs of systemic instability. The discussion also situates the UK alongside European peers facing similar governing strains, suggesting broader institutional and political fragmentation. For policymakers and strategists, the implication is to prioritize reforms that improve governing durability, electoral legitimacy, and crisis-management capacity rather than relying on short-term leadership fixes alone.
-
333.
Chatham House presents its Russia and Eurasia Programme as a policy-impact platform focused on delivering rigorous analysis of Russia, Ukraine, and other post-Soviet states whose trajectories have sharply diverged. The core argument is that Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has fundamentally reshaped regional security and politics, making sovereignty and independence the essential analytical starting point for all countries in scope. Its reasoning is grounded in sustained research output, expert convenings, media engagement, and partnerships with academic and policy institutions to test and disseminate findings on war dynamics, domestic political change, and regional geopolitics. For policymakers and strategists, the implication is a need for differentiated country-specific approaches, long-term support for Ukrainian resilience and reconstruction, and continuous reassessment of Russia’s internal and external trajectory in a volatile regional environment.
-
334.
The report argues that the U.S. must transition from a purely protectionist response to China's automotive dominance toward a proactive strategy of global competition in autonomous, connected, and electric (ACE) vehicles. While current tariffs provide temporary breathing room, the author warns that indefinite isolation risks leaving the U.S. as a technological island of obsolete internal combustion engines while ceding international markets to Chinese firms. To maintain competitiveness, the U.S. should provide conditional financial support to domestic manufacturers, coordinate supply-chain diversification with allies, and manage national security risks through data localization rather than total exclusion. This strategy aims to secure the economic and environmental benefits of the automotive revolution while navigating the geopolitical rivalry with China.
-
335.
The paper argues that a growing number of European NATO members are rapidly pursuing deep precision strike (DPS) capabilities to address a worsening security environment and the post-INF gap in long-range conventional strike options. It finds broad strategic alignment among ELSA partners on deterrence and war-fighting utility, but highlights major national differences in doctrine, industrial capacity, technological baseline, and motivations—illustrated by France and the UK’s dual deterrence/war-fighting framing versus Germany and Poland’s stronger deterrence-by-punishment focus on Russia. Evidence centers on planned expansion from legacy air-launched systems to ground- and sea-launched cruise and ballistic missiles in the 1,000–2,000+ km range, alongside identified enablers such as ISR and kill-chain integration. Strategically, the paper suggests Europe faces difficult policy trade-offs over budgets, force mix, industrial autonomy versus urgent procurement, and unresolved risks around MTCR constraints, Russian reactions, and regional nuclear stability.
-
336.
The CFR’s 2026 Preventive Priorities Survey identifies a significant rise in global instability, highlighting five high-likelihood, high-impact contingencies including intensifying conflicts in the Middle East, the Russia-Ukraine war, and potential U.S. military operations in Venezuela. Based on a survey of over 600 experts, the report emphasizes a shift toward interstate conflict and identifies domestic political violence in the U.S. and AI-enabled cyberattacks as critical threats to national security. These findings suggest that the reduction of conflict prevention infrastructure and more coercive diplomatic stances increase the risk of the United States being drawn into costly, unpredicted military interventions.
-
337.
Chatham House argues that accountability mechanisms must rapidly adapt because cyber operations are now being used to facilitate core international crimes, not just conventional cybercrime. The event highlights the International Criminal Court prosecutor’s new policy on cyber-enabled crimes under the Rome Statute as a key signal that cyber-enabled atrocities should be investigated and prosecuted on equal footing with offline conduct. Its reasoning centers on clarifying which cyber acts meet international criminal law thresholds, building workable legal frameworks, and addressing practical barriers to attribution, evidence collection, and prosecution. Strategically, states and international institutions should align domestic and international legal tools, strengthen investigative cooperation, and prioritize capacity for cyber-forensics and cross-border accountability.
-
338.
The 'America First' tariffs of 2025-2026 have not triggered an immediate recession, largely due to the U.S. economy's resilience and the relatively small role of traded goods in its overall GDP. However, the policy marks a definitive end to the post-WWII rules-based trade order, as tariffs are increasingly used as tools for foreign policy leverage and economic statecraft rather than mere industry protection. While businesses have adapted in the short term, experts warn of long-term consequences including persistent inflationary pressure and reduced economic competition. Ultimately, the shift necessitates a new national consensus to balance the benefits of open trade against the strategic risks of dependency on geopolitical adversaries.
-
339.
CFR argues that President Trump’s new Board of Peace is becoming the central U.S.-led mechanism for shaping Gaza’s postwar order, but its viability hinges on Hamas demilitarization and credible governance arrangements. Evidence cited includes broad diplomatic participation (27 formal members and about 45 expected delegations), expected reconstruction pledges of at least $5 billion, and a governance model that currently excludes Palestinian factions in favor of a separate technocratic committee. Conditions on the ground remain unstable, with limited medical evacuations and returns through Rafah, blocked humanitarian missions, ongoing Israeli strikes, and mutual truce-violation accusations. Strategically, the initiative could accelerate reconstruction and coordination, but exclusion risks and unresolved security control could undermine legitimacy and push Gaza back toward partition or renewed conflict if disarmament and political reintegration fail.
-
340.
The article argues that the Munich Security Conference exposed a deepening political-strategic split inside the West, even as leaders tried to project unity on core security issues. It cites Marco Rubio’s speech as emblematic: he reassured Europe that it still matters to Washington, but paired that with hard limits on U.S. support and warnings that America will act unilaterally when allies resist. The piece also points to contrasting interventions by Wang Yi, Keir Starmer, and Volodymyr Zelenskyy to show how states are recalibrating between U.S.-China rivalry and uncertain transatlantic cohesion. Strategically, it implies European governments should prepare for more conditional U.S. backing, invest in autonomous defense and diplomatic capacity, and pursue flexible coalitions to manage both Russia-related threats and wider great-power competition.
-
341.
The Trump administration has announced plans to revoke the 2009 Endangerment Finding, a move described as the largest deregulatory action in U.S. history that removes the legal basis for capping greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. The administration argues that eliminating these regulations will reduce energy costs and bolster American energy dominance, though the decision faces immediate legal challenges that could reach the Supreme Court. This policy pivot risks ceding leadership in the global electric vehicle and clean energy transition to China while further isolating the United States from international climate cooperation.
-
342.
CFR reports that U.S. Southern Command’s anti-drug boat strike campaign intensified, with eleven people killed in one day across the Eastern Pacific and Caribbean, making it the deadliest day of the operation this year. The brief notes this brings reported fatalities to at least 144 since September, while the U.S. has not publicly released identities or evidence supporting claims that those killed were tied to trafficking networks. It highlights growing legal and normative challenges, including wrongful-death litigation and expert arguments that lethal force against suspected traffickers is unlawful absent an imminent violent threat. Strategically, the campaign may impose rising legal, reputational, and regional diplomatic costs, suggesting a need for stricter oversight, evidentiary transparency, and greater reliance on interdiction and criminal prosecution rather than expanded military strikes.
-
343.
CFR panelists argued that commodity markets have shifted from a demand-led cycle to a supply- and policy-driven regime, with metals (especially gold and silver) rising while oil remains structurally softer. They cited evidence including sustained central-bank gold purchases since the 2022 reserve-freeze shock, growing investor hedging demand, tariff uncertainty under Section 232, and OPEC+/non-OPEC supply conditions that cap oil despite geopolitical tensions. The speakers assessed that oil spikes are still possible from Iran-related disruptions or labor shocks, but likely temporary unless a major outage occurs; baseline Brent expectations clustered around the high-$50s to low-$60s. Strategically, governments and firms should treat commodities as instruments of national security and currency power (including dollar-denominated oil flows), while preparing for persistent precious-metal strength, selective industrial-metal volatility, and policy tradeoffs in U.S.-Venezuela-Canada energy alignment.
-
344.
Chatham House argues that Russia’s invasion is not only devastating Ukraine physically but also accelerating a deeper political transition away from entrenched old-rule networks and vested interests. Its reasoning is that Ukraine was already under internal pressure for reform, and wartime mobilization has intensified public demand for new rules and empowered a newer generation of policymakers. The analysis also stresses that sustained external backing for Ukraine’s defense is structurally shaping the country’s postwar trajectory, making a return to prewar political equilibrium unlikely. Policy-wise, partners should pair military support with long-term institution-building and governance reform assistance to lock in a more resilient Ukrainian state.
-
345.
CFR’s brief argues that simultaneous Geneva negotiations on Iran’s nuclear file and the Ukraine war show the Trump administration trying to position Washington as the indispensable conflict broker, but both tracks remain constrained by major unresolved gaps. The report cites concrete escalation signals and bargaining asymmetries: U.S. military deployments and Iranian drills near Hormuz alongside disagreements over deal scope, and in Ukraine, continued Russian strike pressure and territorial demands despite recent Ukrainian battlefield gains. It also notes mixed diplomatic conditions, including European unease with parts of U.S. positioning and broader geopolitical moves by major powers, indicating a fragmented coalition environment. Strategically, the implication is that U.S. diplomacy may secure partial or phased outcomes at best unless paired with stronger leverage, clearer end-state definitions, and tighter allied coordination.
-
346.
The event argues that defending Ukraine’s cultural, linguistic, and religious sovereignty is essential to any durable peace, because identity policy is directly tied to state security. It cites post-2014 reforms such as de-communization laws, language requirements in public life, and the 2019 independence of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine as evidence of Kyiv’s effort to reduce Russian imperial influence while maintaining private minority-language use. The discussion frames Russia’s full-scale war and negotiation demands (including restoring Russian influence networks and elevating Russian language status) as tools to weaken Ukrainian statehood from within. Strategically, it implies that peace terms must protect Ukraine’s control over domestic identity policy, while balancing EU-aligned minority-rights standards and prioritizing cultural heritage protection in recovery planning.
-
347.Norman E. Alexander Family M Foundation Forum on Science and Foreign Policy: U.S. Science and Research in a Changing Landscape (CFR)
The webinar argues that global oil geopolitics has been fundamentally reshaped by Russia’s war in Ukraine, OPEC+ supply management, and shifting demand centers, even as the energy transition advances. Carolyn Kissane stresses that the world still consumes over 100 million barrels per day, with demand growth concentrated in Asia, while Russia has largely sustained exports by redirecting discounted crude to buyers such as India and China. She also highlights that state-owned producers and OPEC+ coordination continue to exert strong influence on prices, making markets vulnerable when supply is curtailed in already tight conditions. The policy implication is a dual-track strategy: preserve short-term energy security and price stability through diversified supply and contingency tools, while accelerating credible decarbonization pathways that account for uneven capacity and financing constraints across regions.
-
348.
Following the brutal suppression of late 2025 protests, Iranian reformists have shifted from advocating gradual internal change to openly challenging the Islamic Republic's foundational legitimacy. Key leaders like Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi are now demanding national referendums on a new constitution, signaling a break from their previous commitment to the regime's core principles. While their current organizational power is weak and public trust has eroded, these figures could serve as a critical ideological bridge and moderate governing alternative during a future period of regime erosion or transition. This potential role is amplified by the lack of other viable, domestically-led opposition groups capable of managing a political shift.
-
349.
The report argues that European nations must strengthen sanctions against Russia’s 'shadow fleet' of oil tankers by mandating adequate insurance coverage through stricter regulation of flag states. This strategy aims to force vessels back into Western-regulated services, ensuring compliance with price caps and mitigating the risk of uninsured environmental disasters. Economic modeling indicates that aggressive enforcement, including insurance disclosure and flag state liability, could reduce Russian Baltic oil tax revenues by up to 14% while shifting the majority of trade to compliant vessels. To implement this, the UK and EU should coordinate on universal maritime standards and exert diplomatic and economic pressure on 'flags of convenience' to eliminate loopholes used for sanctions evasion.
-
350.
CFR argues that a future Taiwan conflict will likely be a protracted, regional war involving multiple actors and external triggers, rather than a contained three-way contest. The report warns that China’s military modernization and gray-zone tactics have eroded U.S. deterrent advantages and shortened operational warning times. To address these new risks, the U.S. must shift from isolated planning to deeply integrated, pre-crisis consultative mechanisms with regional allies like Japan and the Philippines.
-
351.
The U.S. and Iran face a volatile '50/50' chance of either military conflict or a symbolic diplomatic framework as an unprecedented U.S. military build-up meets low-trust negotiations in Geneva. While the Trump administration seeks a high-profile declaration of victory, Iran demands a formal negotiated text to ensure sanctions relief amid internal social unrest and Israeli pressure for preemption. Gulf states are actively mediating to avoid a regional war that would jeopardize their multi-billion dollar transitions into global AI and digital hubs. Consequently, any tactical miscalculation, particularly involving proxies like the Houthis, could trigger a wider entanglement with severe global economic and security repercussions.
-
352.
CFR argues that Iran still does not have a nuclear weapon, but it retains the technical base to move quickly toward one and continues to field the Middle East’s most extensive ballistic missile arsenal despite major Israeli and U.S. strikes in 2025. The piece cites IAEA findings of sharply increased near-weapons-grade enrichment, evidence of undeclared nuclear-related activity, and estimates that Iran’s breakout timeline for fissile material could be very short, while missile capabilities include systems with roughly 2,000 km range and demonstrated use in 2024 attacks on Israel. It also notes that military strikes may have delayed but not eliminated Iran’s program, as rebuilding and renewed U.S.-Iran talks in Oman suggest coercion alone has limits. Strategically, the article implies policymakers need a combined approach of verifiable nuclear constraints, missile/proxy limits, calibrated sanctions relief, and credible deterrence to reduce risks of regional war, proliferation, and escalation through miscalculation.
-
353.
The article argues that the EU’s 2026 designation of the IRGC as a terrorist organization marks a decisive break from three decades of engagement-based Iran policy. It says Europe’s old balance of pressure and dialogue collapsed after cumulative shocks: Iran’s military support to Russia after 2022, repression following Mahsa Amini’s death, failure to restore the nuclear deal in 2023, and UN snapback sanctions in 2025. The immediate trigger was the scale of the early-2026 crackdown, which convinced European governments there were no credible Iranian interlocutors left and that non-designation carried unacceptable reputational costs. Strategically, the move raises legal and compliance risks for EU and non-EU firms tied to Iran while likely reducing the EU’s diplomatic leverage, leaving Europe more sidelined in US-Iran decision-making.
-
354.
Chatham House argues that Trump’s energy-dominance agenda is delivering visible short-term gains in US oil and LNG output, but global market dynamics make sustained political control over energy trajectories difficult. The article points to record US oil production, LNG export growth above 20%, coal-plant retention measures, and ambitious nuclear expansion goals, while also noting renewables still took most new US power capacity in 2025 and globally covered all demand growth as they surpassed coal in generation. It emphasizes that energy investment cycles run 5–10 years, so current outcomes reflect earlier decisions and require long policy continuity to lock in structural change. For strategy, the US may gain near-term geopolitical leverage over prices and supply chains, but allies’ mixed responses, persistent renewable cost competitiveness, and deeper US exposure to hydrocarbon regions limit long-term dominance and complicate policy tradeoffs.
-
355.
The expiration of the New START treaty on February 5, 2026, marks the end of formal limits on U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, raising significant risks of a new arms race and strategic miscalculation. Experts warn that the loss of robust verification measures and on-site inspections will erode intelligence precision, likely prompting both superpowers to 'upload' reserve warheads onto existing delivery systems. To maintain stability, U.S. policy must balance necessary modernization—such as reopening submarine missile tubes—with the urgent pursuit of a follow-on agreement that ideally addresses non-strategic weapons and China's growing nuclear capabilities.
-
356.
This CSIS analysis maps four potential oil supply disruption scenarios resulting from a possible U.S. military strike against Iran, warning that Tehran's current vulnerability may drive it to target regional energy infrastructure as a last resort. The report details how direct attacks on Arab Gulf facilities could push global oil prices above $130 per barrel, particularly as bypass routes for the Strait of Hormuz remain significantly limited in capacity. These dynamics present a strategic dilemma for the Trump administration, where escalating military pressure could trigger a global energy crisis or a 'use it or lose it' miscalculation by Iranian leadership.
-
357.
The 'frozen conflict' in Transnistria has reached a critical turning point as Russia's loss of energy leverage and Moldova's EU trajectory create a unique three-year window for full reintegration. Since the cessation of Russian gas transit through Ukraine in early 2025, Transnistria’s subsidized economy has faced collapse, shifting the balance of power toward Chisinau and exposing the fragility of Russian patronage. Successful reintegration will require Moldova to implement a comprehensive roadmap for security vetting and legal harmonization, supported by international diplomatic pressure for Russian troop withdrawal and EU financial aid to manage the transition to market-rate energy.
-
358.
Greek Foreign Minister George Gerapetritis argued that Europe is in a transition period requiring both stronger strategic autonomy and continued transatlantic cohesion, rather than a rupture with the United States or NATO. He supported higher European defense burden-sharing, warned that a sustainable Ukraine settlement must be fair and sovereignty-based, and maintained confidence that NATO Article 5 remains credible despite current political volatility. On the Middle East, he backed a UN-anchored Gaza stabilization framework, welcomed coordination with the proposed Board of Peace only within a limited Gaza mandate, and stressed that disarming Hamas must be paired with governance and education to prevent renewed extremism. He also framed Greece as a strategic energy and logistics hub and linked EU trade deals with India and Mercosur to a wider strategy of diversification, implying policymakers should reduce overreliance risks while preserving rules-based multilateral institutions.
-
359.
The column argues that Trump’s 2026 National Defense Strategy (NDS) is built on prioritization and burden-sharing, but the Iran crisis could expose a gap between that framework and the president’s willingness to intervene aggressively. Froman points to NDS language that shifts U.S. focus toward homeland and hemispheric defense, expects allies in Europe and the Indo-Pacific to assume more conventional responsibilities, and seeks a limited “decent peace” with China rather than outright dominance. He contrasts that restraint with Trump’s military signaling toward Iran, including carrier redeployment and maximal demands, while warning that Iran is far harder to coerce or reshape than Venezuela and could produce prolonged instability after any regime shock. The strategic implication is that U.S. policy must keep Iran actions tightly bounded to avoid a costly quagmire that would undermine NDS prioritization and broader force posture goals.
-
360.Exploring Opportunities For European Rearmament Through Ukraines Experience And Indo Pacific Partnerships (IISS)
The paper argues that Ukraine’s wartime defense-industrial adaptation offers a practical model for European rearmament under prolonged high-intensity conflict conditions. It attributes Ukraine’s resilience to three factors: restructuring domestic defense production, rapidly diversifying and hardening supply chains, and building flexible external industrial partnerships beyond Europe. The analysis highlights the growing strategic relevance of Indo-Pacific actors such as South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan for technology and components, while noting that dependence on China remains both operationally important and geopolitically risky. For European strategy, the report implies that rearmament planning should prioritize industrial agility, supplier diversification, and broader cross-regional defense partnerships to strengthen long-term resilience.
-
361.
Chatham House’s Europe Programme argues that Europe needs practical, implementation-focused policy work to navigate a period of geopolitical and political disruption. Its reasoning is that combining EU, NATO, and country-level expertise can turn broad strategic goals into actionable recommendations, especially across its 2024–2027 priorities: the EU’s future, European security, and Europe’s global role. The programme also treats election outcomes and growing political fragmentation as cross-cutting forces that shape progress in all three areas. For policymakers, the implication is to pursue integrated strategies that link institutional reform, security planning, and external action while stress-testing decisions against domestic political volatility across Europe.
-
362.
The article argues that Kenya is moving from a primarily regional leadership role toward a broader, more assertive global foreign policy posture in response to a shifting world order. Its reasoning centers on Kenya’s 2024 strategy, which combines regional integration goals with diversified external partnerships, including longstanding Western security and economic ties, a strategic partnership with China, and expanding links with the UAE. Kenya’s engagement in multilateral security efforts, including the multinational mission in Haiti, is presented as evidence of its willingness to project influence beyond East Africa despite domestic protest pressures and regional conflict risks. Strategically, this suggests Kenya is pursuing pragmatic multi-alignment to maximize diplomatic leverage, trade and financing opportunities, while managing the risks of geopolitical balancing and policy overextension.
-
363.
Chatham House frames Trump’s Belarus policy as a sharp departure from the West’s prior strategy of non-recognition and sanctions against Lukashenka. The immediate evidence is Washington’s lifting of sanctions on Belavia after the September release of Belarusian political prisoners, alongside public statements from Trump and Lukashenka about negotiating a larger deal. The article’s core reasoning is that this transactional approach may generate short-term leverage (for example, prisoner releases) but could undercut coordinated Western pressure on the regime. Strategically, it implies a tradeoff between tactical engagement and alliance cohesion, with potential spillover for Russia-containment policy and Belarus’s role in Russia’s war against Ukraine.
-
364.
The article argues that a tougher Trump approach to Cuba may raise pressure on Havana, but is unlikely to produce a quick Venezuela-style political breakthrough. It points to Cuba’s deepening economic and energy crisis after losing subsidized Venezuelan oil, while emphasizing the regime’s durable control through the Communist Party, security institutions, and weak, fragmented domestic opposition. It also notes that U.S. law (especially the 1992 and 1996 embargo statutes) sharply limits what any administration can offer unless major democratic conditions are met, constraining deal-making. Strategically, this suggests Washington risks worsening humanitarian conditions and migration flows without guaranteed regime change, so policy should combine pressure with realistic transition benchmarks and crisis contingency planning.
-
365.Cloud Adoption For National Security And Defence Purposes Four Case Studies From The Asia Pacific (IISS)
The IISS paper argues that cloud computing is becoming essential for national-security and defence functions in the Asia-Pacific, and that states can combine commercial cloud benefits with sovereign control. Using case studies of Japan, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand, it shows each country adopting hybrid or phased models to handle growing data demands, improve military interoperability, and strengthen decision-making under complex cyber and geopolitical pressure. The analysis highlights that reliance on dominant hyperscalers, especially US providers, creates governance and control trade-offs that governments are managing through tailored technical, legal, and institutional safeguards. Strategically, the paper implies that effective NS&D cloud policy should prioritize secure hybrid architectures, domestic governance capacity, and clear sovereignty mechanisms rather than seeking full digital isolation.
-
366.Lawless Seas Contested Shores Piracy Smuggling And The Scramble For Port Access In The Horn Of Africa (IISS)
IISS argues that maritime insecurity in the Horn of Africa is being reshaped by Somalia’s unresolved state fragility, producing a renewed mix of piracy, arms-smuggling, and strategic competition over ports and bases. The report links piracy’s resurgence since late 2023 to reduced international naval pressure, relaxed commercial risk controls, and regional diversion caused by Red Sea attacks, while also documenting cross-Gulf arms networks that move munitions and dual-use components between Yemen and the Horn. It finds that although external powers are increasingly active, many port and basing ambitions remain tentative, with outcomes still heavily mediated by local actors and domestic Somali/Somaliland politics. For policy, the implication is to pair maritime deterrence with sustained land-side governance and counter-smuggling efforts, while managing great-power and Gulf rivalries through long-horizon diplomacy that accounts for rapid political shifts such as Somaliland recognition and Somalia’s cancellation of UAE agreements.
-
367.
The panel argues that China under Xi is pursuing a long-term effort to reshape international order around sovereignty, regime security, and reduced Western dominance, while avoiding costly ideological bloc politics. Speakers cite evidence including Beijing’s security-first governance model, parallel institution-building (e.g., BRI, AIIB, SCO, BRICS-adjacent platforms), efforts to de-risk supply chains and build economic leverage, and selective mediation diplomacy aimed especially at the Global South. They also emphasize tensions in China’s approach: it promotes an alternative governance narrative but still works inside existing institutions, and its global ambitions are constrained by domestic economic pressures and external pushback. For policymakers, the implication is to treat China’s strategy as structural and adaptive rather than episodic, requiring coordinated responses on economic resilience, technology dependence, and coalition-based diplomacy rather than issue-by-issue reactions.
-
368.
Chatham House’s event frames the war in Ukraine as a hard-power contest whose outcome will shape Europe’s wider security order. General Valerii Zaluzhnyi is positioned to argue that battlefield developments should directly inform diplomatic expectations about war termination rather than optimism detached from military realities. The session emphasizes building a common European security strategy, with specific focus on the UK’s role and Ukraine’s contribution to allied defence and deterrence capacity. For policymakers, the implication is to prioritize long-term military readiness, tighter UK-Europe-Ukraine coordination, and strategy grounded in operational conditions on the front.
-
369.
The India AI Impact Summit represents a strategic shift in global AI governance from theoretical safety concerns toward practical deployment, impact, and inclusivity for the Global South. By focusing on "People, Planet, and Progress," the summit aims to move beyond high-level principles to address the "implementation gap" through operational standards and sovereign AI initiatives that reduce technological dependency. Experts argue that long-term success requires establishing durable cross-border accountability frameworks and ensuring emerging economies play a sustained role in technical standard-setting.
-
370.
Chatham House argues that a second Trump presidency signals a shift from US hegemony to a more openly imperial foreign policy built on coercive leverage rather than alliance stewardship. It cites transactional diplomacy, disregard for international norms, threats toward allies such as Denmark over Greenland, and the operation to capture Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro as evidence of greater willingness to use force in support of a hemispheric dominance strategy. The analysis says this approach weakens NATO cohesion and broader European security assumptions while creating a more volatile environment in which states inside and outside Washington’s preferred orbit must recalibrate. It also concludes that Russia and China face a mix of risk and opportunity as US policy becomes more confrontational, producing a brittle order with higher miscalculation risk.
-
371.
Chatham House frames Trump’s conflict strategy as a deliberate break from traditional diplomacy, centered on his pledge to act as a “peacemaker and unifier” through high-pressure dealmaking. The core logic is transactional: use US leverage to force adversaries into negotiations and lock in outcomes across multiple conflicts, including Ukraine, Gaza, the South Caucasus, and the DRC. The event description highlights mixed and disputed results, arguing that while this approach can create openings, it also unsettles allies and even parts of Trump’s domestic base that see tension with an America First posture. For policymakers, the key implication is that US-led peacemaking may become more coercive and personalized, requiring partners to adapt quickly while planning for uneven sustainability and credibility risks across simultaneous theaters.
-
372.
Chatham House argues that US global influence remains substantial but is increasingly perceived as declining, particularly in economic terms, as China, India and Russia gain weight. The analysis points to policy volatility and experimentation across major dossiers, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Paris climate accord, the Iran nuclear deal, and relations with the EU, Russia and North Korea. At the same time, persistent transnational challenges such as trade, climate change, nuclear risk and terrorism are presented as areas where US engagement is still indispensable. The strategic implication is that Washington’s credibility will depend less on unilateral dominance and more on consistent, coalition-based leadership in managing shared global risks.
-
373.
The article argues that Europe’s sovereignty debate is increasingly split between an integrationist strategy (more EU-level coordination, financing, and industrial policy) and a deregulatory growth strategy (less bureaucracy, stronger national competitiveness). It supports this by contrasting leaders and policy preferences: Macron and Draghi push pooled instruments such as joint procurement and common financing, while De Wever, Merz, and Meloni prioritize regulatory simplification and nationally driven industrial revival. The piece warns that the main danger is not institutional rupture but policy incoherence, where parallel national and EU initiatives in defense and energy create duplication and underpowered outcomes. Strategically, it suggests the most viable path is a calibrated hybrid: selective integration in scale-dependent sectors (defense, tech, energy infrastructure) combined with targeted deregulation to restore growth, with Germany’s choices likely to determine whether that synthesis holds.
-
374.
Chatham House argues that Ukraine’s latest high-level corruption scandal is not only a governance crisis but a direct wartime vulnerability because it can erode domestic legitimacy and external financial support. The case centers on NABU’s alleged exposure of a graft scheme at state-owned Energoatom with potential losses of about $100 million, followed by sanctions steps, ministerial resignations, and allegations involving figures close to President Zelenskyy. The reasoning is that with Ukraine needing roughly $60 billion in external financing in 2026–2027, donor confidence depends on credible enforcement, not just exposure of wrongdoing. Strategically, the brief implies Kyiv and partners should prioritize prosecutorial follow-through, judicial independence, tighter anti-illicit-finance controls, and coordinated messaging to limit Kremlin exploitation of corruption narratives.
-
375.
The article argues that the U.S. must update its narrative on Taiwan, moving away from viewing the island as a 'strategic liability' or a single point of failure for the global economy. It highlights that Taiwan's hardware is the irreplaceable backbone of America's AI ambitions and that conflict with China is not inevitable if a credible military deterrent is maintained. The proposed policy shift emphasizes a middle path: preserving the status quo to allow for an eventual non-coercive resolution while grounding U.S. support in calculated self-interest rather than ideological charity.
-
376.
The INSS reports that President Trump’s 'Board of Peace' (BoP) has evolved from a specific Gaza stabilization initiative into a global conflict-resolution mechanism that bypasses the UN framework, leading to a refusal by major Western democracies to participate. This highly centralized body, controlled personally by Trump, lacks broad international legitimacy and relies on a mix of regional partners and non-democratic states. While the BoP may successfully oversee short-term operational goals in Gaza due to US and regional backing, its long-term viability is threatened by its isolation from traditional Western allies. For Israel, participation offers direct influence over Gaza's reconstruction but risks diplomatic isolation within a board composed of regional rivals.
-
377.
INSS argues that the U.S.-Iran track is in a temporary de-escalation, but absent major Iranian concessions the risk of renewed military confrontation remains high. The analysis cites deep gaps over Iran’s missile program and proxy support, Trump’s credibility pressures after a large U.S. force buildup, and Iran’s regime-survival mindset amid severe domestic unrest and repression as reasons diplomacy may stall. It also notes that Tehran may show limited flexibility on nuclear issues, especially after damage to enrichment capabilities, while refusing concessions on missiles and regional allies. Strategically, a nuclear-only deal with sanctions relief could stabilize the Iranian regime without resolving core regional security threats, leaving Israel and Gulf partners exposed and requiring continued coercive leverage alongside diplomacy.
-
378.
Chatham House argues that repealing the 2009 EPA endangerment finding is a strategic own goal: it may reduce near-term regulatory pressure, but it undermines US long-term economic and technological power. The paper cites estimates that rollbacks could add 7.9-15.3 billion metric tons of emissions by 2055, while also locking US automakers into legacy internal-combustion technologies as global EV adoption accelerates. It contends that lower regulation does not solve competitiveness because EVs often have lower lifetime operating costs, and global demand is shifting toward cleaner vehicles, with EV sales reaching 20.7 million in 2025. Strategically, the implication is that US policy should treat emissions and efficiency standards as industrial policy, sustaining investment in batteries, electrification, and clean-tech supply chains to avoid ceding market share and influence to China.
-
379.
The event argues that worsening humanitarian crises are being driven less by isolated emergencies and more by a structural geopolitical shift from a rules-based order to transactional power politics. Drawing on the IRC’s 2026 Emergency Watchlist, it highlights severe stress signals: rising conflict, extreme food insecurity, and mass displacement alongside declining aid and weakening international cooperation. A key indicator is concentration of risk, with 20 Watchlist countries accounting for 84% of global humanitarian need despite representing only 12% of the world’s population, increasing spillover pressures beyond their borders. The policy implication is that governments and donors should pair near-term protection of vulnerable communities with reforms that build a more resilient, sustainable humanitarian system under conditions of persistent great-power competition.
-
380.
Syria’s foreign minister argued that the post-Assad government is pursuing a pragmatic foreign policy centered on international reintegration, regional de-escalation, and reconstruction through investment rather than ideological confrontation. He cited high-level outreach to Washington and London, partial sanctions relief, embassy reactivation, and active diplomacy on files such as chemical weapons, refugee return, and security arrangements with Israel (including reviving the 1974 disengagement framework) as evidence of progress. He also framed internal stabilization efforts, including dialogue with the SDF and investigative mechanisms for sectarian violence, as prerequisites for restoring trust and attracting capital. The strategic implication is that external partners have an opening to shape Syria’s trajectory by pairing economic and diplomatic engagement with clear expectations on inclusivity, accountability, and institutional consolidation to reduce risks of renewed fragmentation and proxy competition.
-
381.
The discussion argues that oil will remain a central geopolitical risk through the near term, even as countries pursue decarbonization, because global demand is still above 100 million barrels per day and continues to rise. Kissane cites evidence that Russia’s war in Ukraine and OPEC+ production cuts have remapped trade flows, tightened supply, and sustained price volatility, while major buyers such as China and India absorb discounted Russian crude. She also notes that energy power is concentrated in a few producers and state-owned firms, with over 75% of global oil controlled by national companies, amplifying political leverage in markets. The strategic implication is that governments should pair energy-transition goals with hard energy-security planning: diversify suppliers, protect critical transport infrastructure, manage strategic reserves prudently, and avoid removing conventional supply faster than resilient alternatives can scale.
-
382.The UK critical minerals strategy: Building national resilience through global political and commercial collaboration (Chatham House)
Chatham House’s event framing argues that the UK’s new Critical Minerals Strategy is centered on reducing supply-chain vulnerability while preserving international openness. The core reasoning is that critical minerals are now indispensable to UK manufacturing, clean energy deployment, and industrial competitiveness, but exposure to geopolitical rivalry and demand shocks creates strategic risk. The strategy therefore combines domestic capability-building with deeper political and commercial collaboration with partner countries and industry actors. For policy, this implies a dual-track approach: strengthen national resilience at home while institutionalizing trusted international partnerships to secure long-term access in a contested global minerals market.
-
383.
A 2026 CFR-Morning Consult survey reveals that while Americans generally view trade as a mutually beneficial reciprocal exchange, public opinion on tariffs is deeply fractured along partisan lines. Although nearly half of respondents recognize tariffs as a tax on domestic consumers that increases the cost of living, a significant portion of Republicans views them primarily as a tool for protecting U.S. manufacturing jobs. The findings suggest that while there is broad support for trading with allies and maintaining international rules, there is also growing public desire for congressional guardrails to limit unilateral presidential authority over trade policy.
-
384.
The event’s core argument is that violent extremism in West Africa cannot be contained by national responses because insecurity from the Lake Chad Basin to western Mali is fundamentally cross-border. Speakers point to the erosion of regional mechanisms after coups in the central Sahel, with stalled cooperation on hot pursuit, joint operations, intelligence sharing, and disruption of illicit finance, while Mali’s fuel blockade illustrates hard economic-security interdependence for landlocked states. The discussion suggests that parallel security blocs alone will be insufficient unless trust is rebuilt between Sahel and coastal states through practical bilateral and regional arrangements. Policy priorities therefore include restoring interoperable regional frameworks, creating confidence-building mechanisms among governments, and pairing military coordination with strategies that address underlying political and socio-economic drivers of insecurity.
-
385.
CFR panelists argued that while Greenland is strategically important for Arctic warning, surveillance, and transatlantic security, U.S. ownership is not necessary to secure core defense interests. They cited the still-valid 1951 U.S.-Denmark defense framework, which already allows expanded U.S. basing and operations, and noted that practical constraints—harsh operating conditions, limited infrastructure, and high costs—undercut both military seizure scenarios and rapid resource exploitation. On critical minerals, speakers stressed that Greenland has potential but development cycles are long, financing is market-driven, and cooperation with allies (especially Denmark, Canada, and Europe) is more realistic than unilateral control. Strategically, the discussion suggests Washington should prioritize negotiated security upgrades and allied supply-chain partnerships, since coercive moves on Greenland would risk damaging NATO cohesion and broader U.S.-Europe coordination.
-
386.Despite reset in India–US relations, New Delhi retains commitment to strategic hedging (Chatham House)
Chatham House argues that the February 6 India-US tariff deal marks only a partial reset, while New Delhi continues its long-standing strategy of hedging rather than aligning fully with Washington. Although US tariffs on India reportedly fell from 50% to 18% in exchange for major Indian purchase commitments and a pledge to stop Russian oil imports, implementation remains ambiguous because Indian state refiners still buy Russian crude and enforcement details are unclear. The article also notes political and economic constraints on both sides, including India’s sensitivity over agriculture, uncertainty over alternative oil supply, and persistent risk that the US could reimpose tariffs. Strategically, India is likely to keep diversifying trade, energy, and defense ties across multiple partners, implying a more transactional India-US relationship with limited US leverage over India’s broader foreign-policy autonomy.
-
387.
Chatham House argues that Russia’s sustained, precision strikes on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure have become a strategic campaign to erode civilian resilience and force Kyiv to redirect scarce wartime resources from defense to emergency repairs. The event framing highlights compounding evidence: prolonged electricity shortages (in some areas down to a few hours per day), winter-time disruption of heating and water, economic losses from repeated infrastructure damage, and heightened humanitarian risk including potential new displacement flows into Europe. It also emphasizes that the pressure is systemic rather than episodic, with damage now threatening continuity of essential urban services and social stability. Policy implications are to pair immediate humanitarian and grid-repair support with longer-term protection measures and faster deployment of decentralized energy systems, while coordinating state, local, and civil-society resilience efforts with sustained partner backing.
-
388.
INSS argues that Israel can economically absorb a gradual reduction in direct U.S. military aid, but the strategic and political value of the aid framework remains significant. It notes that aid now equals only about 0.5% of Israel’s GDP yet still funds roughly 15% of the defense budget, while stricter aid terms increasingly route spending to U.S. procurement and reduce direct support for Israeli industry. The paper also stresses that aid functions as a strategic anchor for U.S.-Israel ties and access to advanced U.S. systems, even as bipartisan support in the United States has weakened and aid has become more politically contested. It recommends replacing the current model with a formal transition toward defense-industrial partnership, avoiding full dollar-for-dollar budget replacement, and using the shift to drive efficiency, prioritization, and domestic capability building.
-
389.2025 Arthur Ross Book Award Ceremony and Meeting: "The Achilles Trap: Saddam Hussein, the C.I.A., and the Origins of America's Invasion of Iraq” (CFR)
At CFR’s 2025 Arthur Ross Book Award ceremony, the central discussion around Steve Coll’s The Achilles Trap argued that the Iraq War stemmed not only from U.S. analytic and policy failures but from a profound misreading of Saddam Hussein’s motives and decision logic. Drawing on newly accessible Iraqi archives, tapes of Saddam’s internal meetings, and interviews, Coll showed that Saddam had largely dismantled key WMD capabilities in 1991 yet preserved ambiguity out of regime psychology, deterrence signaling, and distrust that sanctions would be lifted even with cooperation. The conversation emphasized that U.S. policymakers over-relied on partial intelligence and assumptions, while limited direct contact with Baghdad deepened strategic misperception. The policy implication is to prioritize adversary psychology, maintain calibrated channels of communication with hostile regimes, and apply greater analytic humility before irreversible military decisions.
-
390.
Robert D. Blackwill proposes "resolute global leadership" as the most effective American grand strategy to counter a peer-competitor China and navigate the most dangerous international environment since World War II. The report analyzes five alternative strategic schools, concluding that the U.S. must leverage its unique economic, military, and technological advantages while reconciling itself to a world where its dominance is no longer unchallenged. Key policy recommendations include substantially increasing the defense budget, pivoting military assets to the Indo-Pacific, and re-engaging in multilateral trade frameworks like the CPTPP to revitalize the rules-based order. Ultimately, it emphasizes balancing Chinese power through strengthened alliances and 'peace through strength,' while rejecting military force for purely ideological goals.
-
391.
The panel’s core finding is that the UK can afford warfighting only if it makes earlier, harder political choices on defence spending and reform, because current plans are too slow for the threat timeline. Speakers argued that moving from roughly 2.3% to 3.5% of GDP requires major trade-offs (higher taxes, cuts elsewhere, or more borrowing) and that past procurement failures have weakened confidence that spending converts into usable capability. They stressed that modern conflict would hit the UK homeland through cyber, disinformation, and infrastructure disruption as well as missiles and drones, while reduced US support raises the burden on Europe. Strategically, the UK should accelerate readiness, improve procurement accountability and industrial surge capacity, rebuild stockpiles, and run a more honest national debate on resilience, mobilisation, and societal preparedness.
-
392.
The Chatham House panel argued that shrinking Western aid budgets are no longer just a development issue but a strategic security risk for the UK and its partners. Speakers cited sharp cuts across major donors, disruption from the 2025 USAID retrenchment, and operational impacts such as HALO Trust potentially shrinking from 12,000 to 7,000 staff, warning this will hit fragile and conflict-affected states hardest. They reasoned that reduced support for conflict prevention, multilateral institutions, and long-term partnerships creates space for rival influence, increases instability and migration pressures, and weakens UK diplomatic leverage. For UK strategy, the discussion pointed to prioritizing conflict-focused aid, preserving credible multilateral engagement while using targeted bilateral strengths, rebuilding a clear long-term narrative linking aid to domestic security, and mobilizing non-traditional and private financing to offset fiscal constraints.
-
393.Redrawing global boundaries? The United States, China, and the viability of spheres of influence in the 21 st century (Brookings)
Brookings’ expert roundtable argues that a U.S. "Donroe Doctrine" push for hemispheric primacy is more likely to weaken than strengthen Washington’s position in long-term competition with China, though one contributor contends it could restore deterrence by denying Beijing footholds near U.S. borders. The dominant reasoning is that coercive regional tactics and unilateral moves drain U.S. military bandwidth from the Indo-Pacific, damage alliances, and erode soft power while giving China narrative and diplomatic advantages. Experts also note China’s already deep regional footprint, including major trade, investment, and infrastructure ties across Latin America, which makes a clean spheres-of-influence rollback unrealistic. Strategically, a formal U.S.-China spheres bargain is assessed as unstable and asymmetric: it could pressure smaller states to hedge, accelerate regional militarization and possible nuclear proliferation, and incentivize revisionist claims elsewhere, suggesting U.S. policy should prioritize alliance credibility, rules-based coordination, and positive economic alternatives over coercion.
-
394.
The conflict in Ukraine has settled into a prolonged pattern of attrition and positional fighting, with neither side achieving a decisive breakthrough. While Russia retains tactical advantages, the analysis suggests that time is working against Moscow due to increasing manpower strain and operational failures, preventing the attainment of key objectives like fully securing Donetsk. Strategically, the fighting itself informs the relative leverage of both parties, meaning that external diplomatic pressure to impose a cease-fire is unlikely to succeed. Policymakers must recognize that the war is not nearing a quick end and that sustained, long-term support is required to manage a protracted conflict.
-
395.
The publication argues that while the transatlantic alliance faces deep rifts due to US political volatility, the commitment to the partnership remains strong. Allies must adapt by adopting a strategy of assertive self-reliance, recognizing that they can no longer solely depend on the United States for security. This requires enhancing mutual burden-sharing and maintaining robust trade ties while simultaneously holding firm on national interests. The path forward demands a strategic shift from passive appeasement to a proactive, mutually beneficial partnership that asserts the sovereignty of all involved parties.
-
396.Managing Systemic Supply Chain Risk to the U.S. Economy from Trade Concentration and Geopolitical Conflict: The Roles of Insurance and Other Hedging Strategies (RAND)
This RAND report argues that systemic supply chain risks from geopolitical conflict are significant and underappreciated, particularly in sectors like nonferrous metals and electrical components sourced from countries such as Brazil and India. The authors find that private insurance is ill-suited for managing these correlated, large-scale risks, while government interventions often lack necessary market-sensing mechanisms to prevent unsustainable private practices. To enhance resilience, the report recommends that the U.S. government track conflict-dependency overlaps and that industries adopt 'Til Needed' hedging options—private contracts for surge capacity—to bridge the gap between market incentives and national economic security.
-
397.
The article argues that global liberal democracy is undergoing a significant decline, challenging post-Cold War assumptions about its permanence. Key evidence points to the consolidation of power by autocracies (e.g., China, Russia), the slide of established democracies into illiberalism (e.g., Hungary, Turkey), and the rise of coups in regions like Africa. Furthermore, the rule of law is weakening even in historically stable democracies, suggesting a global trend toward authoritarianism. Policy implications suggest that international strategy must urgently reassess the resilience of democratic institutions and develop proactive measures to counter the global spread of illiberal governance.
-
398.
The article argues that global population aging and shrinking working-age populations will fundamentally constrain the capacity of major states to wage war, leading to a potential 'geriatric peace.' This theory is supported by demographic trends, such as China's projected dramatic decline in its working-age population, which limits both resources and manpower for conflict. While acknowledging that demographic factors are not deterministic—citing Russia's invasion of Ukraine as a counterexample—the analysis suggests that these limitations will dampen the pressures for large-scale great power conflict, particularly between the US and China. Policymakers should factor demographic decline into long-term strategic planning, recognizing it as a structural brake on military escalation.
-
399.The Hour of the Predator: Encounters With the Autocrats and Tech Billionaires Taking Over the World (Foreign Affairs)
The article argues that the established Western-led international order is collapsing, replaced by a new global power elite composed of ruthless autocrats and tech billionaires. This shift is characterized by a disregard for international law and democratic norms, exemplified by the dangerous combination of authoritarianism and artificial intelligence. The piece warns that the traditional diplomatic and legal frameworks are insufficient to counter these powerful, self-serving 'predators.' Policy must prepare for a future marked by chaos and the absence of reliable global rules.
-
400.
The war in Ukraine is characterized as a hybrid conflict, blending historical elements like static frontlines with unprecedented technological advancements. The key evidence cited is the broad and effective integration of modern technologies, including satellites, autonomous systems, and AI software, fundamentally changing the nature of warfare. For the United States, these trends are deeply concerning, suggesting that military doctrine must adapt to a high-tech environment rather than relying on assumptions of quick, decisive victory. America must therefore learn to navigate this complex technological battlefield to maintain strategic superiority.
-
401.
The reviewed books analyze the 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union, arguing that the conflict was fundamentally ideological, pitting Nazi extermination goals against Soviet communism. One analysis highlights that Hitler viewed Jews and Bolsheviks as inseparable enemies, noting that anti-Jewish violence predated the Holocaust, while another reconstructs the initial invasion period, showing that local populations often viewed Jews as the embodiment of the regime, regardless of the invaders' identity. The findings challenge modern historical narratives, noting how both the Soviet Union and Western powers have historically emphasized different aspects of the conflict—Soviet sacrifice versus the Holocaust—and how contemporary institutions treat Nazism and communism as equally abhorrent. This suggests that historical memory remains a highly contested field, influencing current geopolitical narratives and diplomatic relations.
-
402.
The analysis argues that Putin's authoritarian regime faces a unique vulnerability: the excessive zeal of its own loyalists. These officials, desperate to demonstrate loyalty, often misinterpret the Kremlin's ambiguous intentions, leading them to make statements or take actions that inadvertently undermine the regime's interests. The regime is trapped in a cycle where it cannot punish sycophancy without risking a loss of perceived loyalty, creating internal instability. Policymakers should recognize that this internal contradiction makes Russian behavior unpredictable and suggests that the regime's stability is contingent on managing this volatile internal dynamic.
-
403.
The article argues that European leaders have historically failed to adequately deter authoritarian threats, citing both the failures in the Balkans and the appeasement of Hitler's regime. Specifically, the author critiques contemporary European leaders (including those in Austria, Germany, and Hungary) for appeasing modern authoritarians, such as Russia's Vladimir Putin. This appeasement is characterized not merely as naiveté, but often as an opportunistic pursuit of material gain. The implication is that this pattern of willful disregard for authoritarian dangers poses a significant strategic risk to European stability and democratic integrity.
-
404.
The analysis of Stoltenberg's NATO tenure argues that while the alliance successfully navigated multiple crises, its diplomatic efforts ultimately struggled against the overwhelming forces of great-power geopolitics. Key evidence shows that despite intense negotiations and increased defense spending, NATO was unable to prevent political drift (e.g., Trump's skepticism) or ensure timely, decisive material support for allies. The primary implication is that while collective defense remains vital, future NATO strategy must develop mechanisms to bridge the gap between political commitment and rapid, reliable military aid to ensure the stability and sovereignty of Eastern European partners.
-
405.
The article critiques the widely accepted narrative that the world has transitioned into a 'multipolar' era, arguing that this consensus is often treated as a self-evident fact rather than a proposition requiring scrutiny. It notes that major global powers, including the US, China, and Russia, are all adopting this language to signal the end of American unipolar dominance. For policy strategists, the implication is that the concept of multipolarity should be approached with skepticism, as the true global power structure may be far more complex or less fragmented than the prevailing narrative suggests.
-
406.
The analysis challenges the notion that BRICS+ operates as a unified geopolitical counterweight to Western powers. Instead, the grouping functions as a highly fragmented forum where member states pursue diverse and often conflicting national interests. Evidence demonstrates this divergence: Russia and China leverage the platform for de-dollarization, while India uses it to press Beijing over border disputes, and nations like Indonesia hedge by engaging with multiple global bodies. Policymakers should therefore view the bloc not as a monolithic force, but as a complex, decentralized collection of rising powers whose collective action is limited by internal divisions and competing agendas.
-
407.
The analysis argues that the European Union has managed to survive major crises since 1989 not through resolving deep structural weaknesses, but by skillfully managing internal conflicts. Key evidence points to the survival of the euro, which the author attributes to member state leaders' political maneuvering despite underlying economic fragility. While the book concludes with a degree of optimism regarding Europe's future, the underlying assessment suggests that the continent's stability remains highly dependent on continuous political mediation and careful management of internal divisions and external geopolitical threats.
-
408.
The article posits that the international system is at a crossroads, facing a choice between a multipolar world of competing spheres of influence (Yalta logic) or an open, cooperative multilateral order (Helsinki logic). This contest is defined by three major coalitions: the 'Global West' (US, Europe, Japan), the 'Global East' (China, Russia), and the pivotal 'Global South.' The Global South is identified as the decisive factor in determining the future global order. Policymakers are advised that the West must adopt a strategy of 'pragmatic realism,' engaging with both the East and the South to rebuild a rules-based global system centered on the UN.
-
409.The Rise of the Russian Hawks: Ideology and Politics From the Late Soviet Union to Putin’s Russia (Foreign Affairs)
The research traces the rise of 'modernist conservatism'—an anti-Western ideology encompassing Orthodox monarchists and Eurasianists—from informal intellectual circles in the late Soviet era to its current influence on the Putin regime. Key evidence shows that these groups advocate for a self-reliant Russian model based on technological and military might to assert civilizational distinction from the West. While the Kremlin has increasingly adopted this thinking, the leadership now relies on external think tanks rather than formal state institutions for ideological production. This suggests that Russia's strategic direction is driven by decentralized, yet potent, ideological currents, complicating policy responses and signaling a persistent, non-state source of geopolitical pressure.
-
410.
The current geopolitical focus of policymakers in Washington and Europe is overwhelmingly consumed by responding to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. This response has necessitated the provision of massive military, economic, and humanitarian aid to prevent Ukraine’s collapse. While the immediate crisis demands immense resources, the article suggests that this singular focus may obscure the preparation for future conflicts. Policymakers must therefore look beyond the current front lines to anticipate and mitigate emerging security threats across the broader European continent.
-
411.
The article argues that Russian defense policymaking operates within an "imperfect equilibrium" between presidential authority and military leadership, characterized by cycles of reform and centralization. Key evidence traces Putin's efforts to control the armed forces, from the sweeping reforms of Anatoly Serdyukov to the subsequent rearmament under Sergei Shoigu. However, the military's structural flaws became critically evident during the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Consequently, effective military improvement requires deeper presidential involvement in decision-making and the significant militarization of the national economy.
-
412.
The conflict in Ukraine demonstrates that modern great-power warfare is characterized by sustained, highly destructive conventional conflict and a fragile, elevated risk of nuclear escalation, rather than quick, decisive outcomes. While Russia's nuclear threats are significant, Ukraine's resilience and ability to strike deep into Russian territory show that nuclear weapons do not guarantee coercive leverage. Consequently, the U.S. must update its defense planning to prepare for protracted wars of attrition with nuclear-armed adversaries, focusing on strengthening deterrence, coordinating with allies, and maintaining readiness for extended, high-stakes conflicts.
-
413.Export Controls on Artificial Intelligence and Uncrewed Aircraft Systems: Interagency Challenges (RAND)
This RAND report argues that current U.S. export controls for AI and uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) are lagging behind rapid technological advancements and require a more agile, data-centric interagency approach. The study finds that the U.S. no longer maintains a technological monopoly, meaning overly restrictive controls risk hollowing out the domestic industrial base and driving global partners toward Chinese alternatives. Consequently, the authors recommend shifting regulatory focus toward specialized military training data rather than ubiquitous hardware, while calling for increased funding and technical expertise for the Bureau of Industry and Security.
-
414.
The article posits that in the current era of great-power competition, diplomacy must be understood not merely as communication, but as a sophisticated exercise in grand strategy. Historically, successful statecraft—as demonstrated by figures from Bismarck to the Byzantines—requires leaders to build complex alliances and coalitions to offset limited national capabilities. This strategic process involves restricting the operational space of adversaries while integrating diplomatic goals with both military and economic power. Consequently, the analysis stresses that mastering this comprehensive art of statecraft is increasingly vital for managing threats and maintaining stability in a fractured global order.
-
415.
The conflict in Ukraine has evolved into a protracted 'war of endurance,' significantly exceeding Russia's initial objectives of quick subjugation. The conflict is characterized as Europe's largest conventional war since World War II, marked by its longevity and immense human cost. This sustained nature suggests that the conflict is less about rapid military victory and more about attrition and geopolitical resilience. Policy implications necessitate a long-term strategic commitment from international partners, recognizing that the war's endurance requires sustained support across military, economic, and diplomatic fronts.
-
416.
The article argues that the initial Western objective of restoring Ukraine's full pre-2022 sovereignty over all internationally recognized territory has become strategically implausible. This shift in goal is attributed to the failure of Ukraine's 2023 counteroffensive, which forced Western leaders to concede a new reality. Consequently, policy and strategy must pivot away from demanding full territorial restoration and instead focus on a more pragmatic, negotiated settlement that accepts Russia's de facto control over occupied regions. This suggests a necessary re-evaluation of victory conditions for international support.
-
417.
This report analyzes the evolving demographics and welfare needs of the Royal Navy and Royal Marines (RN&RM) community, projecting a stable Regular force of approximately 33,000 through 2040 despite a more volatile strategic environment. It finds that increasing operational tempo and unpredictable deployments are placing significant strain on families, evidenced by high levels of partner loneliness and chronic childcare accessibility issues. The study suggests that the Naval welfare sector must modernize its support by adopting holistic, 'whole force' approaches that mitigate mental health stigma and address structural barriers to partner employment to ensure long-term recruitment and retention.
-
418.
Beijing views the current U.S. policy toward China as a moment of strategic flux and opportunity, capitalizing on perceived inconsistency in Washington's approach. China is actively shifting from a reactive to an offensive posture, using economic tools like rare-earth controls and exerting pressure on U.S. allies to strengthen its global standing. Furthermore, the U.S.'s increased focus on the Western Hemisphere and Latin America is interpreted by Beijing as a strategic distraction, allowing China to dedicate greater resources and attention to the Indo-Pacific. Policymakers must recognize that this enduring rivalry persists despite short-term policy shifts, requiring a nuanced strategy that addresses China's proactive regional ambitions.
-
419.
European leaders and Canada convened a 'coalition of the willing' summit to establish security guarantees for Ukraine amidst ongoing Russian assaults. The primary finding is the commitment to forming a multinational European-led force, comprising land and sea components, designed for deployment should a ceasefire be reached. While hailed as a breakthrough, the outcome is noted as a repetition of previous commitments, suggesting a predictable, albeit detailed, path toward collective security. Strategically, this indicates a sustained, multilateral European effort to manage the conflict's aftermath and deter future aggression.
-
420.
Russia's conflict is evolving beyond traditional hybrid operations, escalating into a comprehensive 'shadow war' aimed at destabilizing the entire continent. This campaign involves increasingly nakedly kinetic attacks targeting critical infrastructure and populations within NATO borders, indicating a shift from mere persuasion to outright destruction. Policymakers must recognize this strategic escalation, as Moscow's objective is no longer limited to Ukraine but is designed to dismantle the collective will and physical capacity of European adversaries. Counter-strategies must therefore address this direct, destructive warfare rather than solely focusing on diplomatic or informational countermeasures.
-
421.
The article argues that the U.S.-India relationship is critically important for future global stability and must be actively maintained. Historically, India maintained a policy of nonalignment and viewed the U.S. with suspicion. However, the geopolitical shift following the Soviet collapse and the rise of China has transformed India into a strategically vital partner. Therefore, the U.S. must deepen its engagement with India to create a robust counterweight to China's growing influence, particularly within the Indo-Pacific region.
-
422.
The article argues that Russia's role as a global patron is increasingly compromised by external geopolitical pressures, suggesting that Moscow's strategic support for allied states is vulnerable to intervention. Using the alleged U.S. operation against Venezuela as a primary example, the analysis highlights how Western powers exploit or undermine Russia's client relationships, thereby diminishing Russia's influence. For policy makers, this suggests that Russia must adapt its diplomatic strategy, moving beyond traditional patronage models to build more resilient, decentralized alliances that can withstand overt foreign aggression. Ultimately, the findings imply that Russia's global strategy requires a fundamental shift to counter perceived Western encroachment and maintain strategic autonomy.
-
423.
The analysis concludes that the Islamic Republic of Iran is a 'zombie regime' whose ideological and economic foundations are failing, making the current status quo unsustainable. The mounting, nationwide protests are fueled by deep political, economic, and social grievances that transcend traditional ethnic or class divides. Crucially, the regime's core anti-Western ideology is losing legitimacy as the population increasingly prioritizes national reclamation and stability over foreign-directed conflict. Policymakers should anticipate that while the regime may use violence to delay its collapse, the underlying grievances will persist, suggesting a profound and complex transition away from the current theocratic structure.
-
424.
The article argues that Vladimir Putin's preference for conflict is a calculated strategic choice rather than an unavoidable geopolitical fate. It likely draws on historical diplomatic failures, contrasting periods of détente with current aggressive actions to demonstrate that confrontation is a policy decision. The analysis suggests that Russia views military conflict as a primary tool for achieving core national objectives, making purely diplomatic solutions insufficient. Policymakers must therefore adjust strategies to account for this deep-seated preference for confrontation, requiring robust deterrence and structural containment measures.
-
425.
This speculative article explores a plausible, yet non-inevitable, scenario detailing how Greenland could fall under American influence by 2028. The core argument suggests that this 'Americanization' would not be achieved through overt military force or formal purchase, but rather through subtle, deliberate political maneuvering within the complex corridors of Arctic geopolitics. The piece serves as a geopolitical warning, cautioning policymakers about the risks of non-military, shadow-play influence that could undermine national sovereignty. It implies that proactive diplomatic and strategic efforts are necessary to prevent such a potentially disastrous outcome.
-
426.
The removal of Nicolás Maduro has created a precarious power vacuum, forcing the Venezuelan regime into an existential dilemma between outright defiance and pragmatic collaboration with the United States. The analysis suggests the regime's primary focus is survival, making the retention of power—rather than democratic reform—its critical 'redline.' While the U.S. demands center on material gains, particularly control over oil resources, the current trajectory risks establishing a semi-colonial state. Consequently, the U.S. strategy is unlikely to yield a long-term political solution, as the opposition remains excluded from any table of negotiation.
-
427.
The article argues that characterizing the current US-China relationship solely through Cold War analogies is inaccurate and dangerous, as the global system is fundamentally multipolar and highly integrated economically. Westad notes that unlike the bipolar Cold War era, great powers now compete within a single, interconnected global economic framework. While historical lessons—such as the necessity of dialogue, mutual respect, and strategic deterrence—remain crucial for managing crises, policymakers must acknowledge the unprecedented complexity of this modern, interconnected order. Therefore, strategy must balance great power competition with mechanisms for sustained communication to prevent conflict.
-
428.
The article argues that the United States and China are uniquely positioned to forge a 'grand bargain' to stabilize the global order, shifting from ideological confrontation to productive coexistence. This opportunity is driven by the recognition that both nations benefit from a multipolar world and are deeply economically interdependent. To prevent a high-risk conflict, the policy strategy must pivot toward pragmatic cooperation, requiring the reform of the international system. Implementing this bargain necessitates establishing reciprocal agreements on trade, technology, and security to ensure peaceful power sharing and mutual benefit.
-
429.
The article argues that Russia is undergoing a descent into a more overt and pervasive form of tyranny following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Key evidence cited includes the unexpected surge in popularity of George Orwell’s *1984* within Russian culture, suggesting a growing internal awareness or critique of the regime's totalitarian tendencies. For policy, this implies that Western strategies must anticipate deepening internal dissent and recognize that the Kremlin's control mechanisms are becoming increasingly reliant on propaganda and surveillance. Policymakers should prepare for a prolonged period of internal instability and heightened authoritarianism within the Russian state.
-
430.
The article argues that the risk of catastrophic miscalculation, which has historically plagued nuclear deterrence, remains critically high in the modern information environment. It uses the 1983 Soviet early warning system incident as a key historical precedent, demonstrating how a false alarm could have triggered a devastating counterattack. The core finding is that the proliferation of deepfakes and sophisticated disinformation threatens to create false signals of intent, mimicking past warning failures. Therefore, policymakers must urgently develop robust verification protocols and strategic guardrails to prevent fabricated information from escalating into geopolitical or military crises.