The article argues that the Federal Reserve's recent rate hike decision, while justifiable on inflation grounds, highlights a critical lack of an underlying, transparent policy framework. The core problem is that the Fed's decisions appear discretionary, leading to market uncertainty because the committee's judgment, rather than clear data, dictates policy shifts. The author proposes that the Fed adopt a formal monetary policy rule—an algebraic formula linking the target rate to indicators like inflation and unemployment—to replace subjective guidance. Implementing such a rule would provide market predictability, enhance transparency, and shield the Fed from political attacks by making deviations from the standard easily quantifiable.
Trump Needs a Middle East Humanitarian Plan—Before It’s Too Late
English Summary
The Trump administration has failed to deploy a humanitarian strategy for Middle East conflicts despite $11 billion in military spending and $5.4 billion in Congressional humanitarian funding available—a policy choice, not a capacity constraint. With over 1 million displaced in Lebanon and 3.2 million in Iran (potentially the largest refugee crisis of the 21st century), the humanitarian void is creating cascading global crises including food insecurity and disrupted supply chains. The author argues that unaddressed humanitarian crises historically breed extremism, mass migration, and state collapse—requiring far costlier future interventions—while humanitarian investment offers superior long-term security returns. The administration previously demonstrated rapid humanitarian response in Beirut (2020) and Jamaica (2025), proving capability. The article recommends programming available funds, establishing sanctions carve-outs for aid, creating a UN-coordinated operation center, and convening a humanitarian pledging conference.
中文摘要
川普政府儘管掌握110億美元中東衝突軍事經費與54億美元國會人道主義經費，但未能為中東衝突部署人道主義戰略——此為政策選擇，而非能力制約。黎巴嫩逾百萬流離失所人口、伊朗320萬流離失所人口（可能為21世紀最大難民危機），人道主義真空正導致級聯全球危機，包括糧食不安全和供應鏈中斷。作者主張，歷史上未解決的人道主義危機往往滋生極端主義、大規模移民和國家崩潰，需要付出更大代價的未來干預，而人道主義投資提供優越的長期安全回報。該政府曾在貝魯特（2020年）和牙買加（2025年）迅速部署人道主義回應，證明其有此能力。文章建議編列現有經費、為援助設立制裁豁免、建立聯合國協調行動中心，並召開人道主義捐款會議。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The ongoing Ebola outbreak in the DRC serves as a critical warning that the global health security system is fundamentally unprepared for future biological threats. The difficulty in containing this outbreak is compounded by the rising risk of emerging pathogens and the growing potential for AI misuse in bioweapon development. Policy must therefore shift from reactive, crisis-driven funding to sustained, proactive investment in resilient public health infrastructure, particularly in conflict zones. Addressing this requires strengthening global surveillance, ensuring consistent international cooperation, and mitigating the intersection of conflict, climate change, and disease spread.
-
3.A Design Lab Pilot to Inform Strategies for Expanding Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Community Mental Health Centers (RAND)
Despite MOUD being the standard of care for opioid use disorder, access remains severely limited in Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs), which serve the primary population with co-occurring disorders. A Design Lab pilot identified payment limitations and regulatory complexity as the chief barriers to implementation. The most feasible and high-impact strategy identified was establishing a structured learning exchange between CMHC leaders and insurers to improve reimbursement understanding. Policymakers and payers are therefore advised to pilot this learning exchange model to initiate broader payment reform and expand evidence-based care for this vulnerable population.
-
4.
The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.
-
5.
Congress has significantly expanded presidential tariff authority by passing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, allowing the executive to impose up to 100% tariffs on key buyers of Russian energy and sanctions enablers. The article argues that this legislation represents a dangerous abdication of Congress's Article I authority, as it grants the executive vast, discretionary power without specifying criteria for enforcement. Historically, the executive could claim tariffs were its own doing; however, by writing and passing this new authority, Congress now owns the resulting trade policy and its economic consequences. This shift implies that future tariffs will be viewed by the public as a direct legislative action, potentially undermining the administration's credibility and creating political vulnerability.