Heritage argues that the Smithsonian's new Latino exhibit, "¡Puro Ritmo!," is ideologically biased and incomplete, failing to provide a balanced historical narrative. The critique centers on the exhibit's conspicuous exclusion of Spanish musical and cultural contributions, which are argued to be foundational to the development of salsa, alongside the omission of Catholicism. The article suggests this pattern reflects a broader institutional tendency to frame complex cultural identities through a narrow, left-leaning lens, often minimizing Western influence. For policy, this highlights the vulnerability of publicly funded cultural institutions to political framing that distorts historical understanding and complicates the accurate representation of diverse ethnic and cultural heritages.
Heritage
This hub page collects curated ThinkTankWeekly entries for Heritage and links readers back to the publisher for the original reports.
-
1.
-
2.
This Heritage Foundation analysis argues that Donald Trump’s intervention was crucial in preventing the UK’s planned handover of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, a move perceived as a strategic concession to Communist China. The article contends that Prime Minister Starmer’s pursuit of the deal, fueled by a ‘Deep State’ and lacking a clear strategic rationale, posed a significant threat to U.S. and British security. Trump’s opposition, bolstered by support from figures like John Kennedy and Claire Bullivant, successfully halted the legislation, preventing China from gaining undue influence in the Indo-Pacific. The piece highlights Trump’s decisive action as a vital defense against a potentially disastrous foreign policy misstep.
-
3.
The article argues that Virginia Democrats are engaging in extreme partisan actions, notably through gerrymandering, to consolidate political power within wealthy Northern Virginia suburbs. Key evidence cited includes the proposed district map's bias toward elite areas, alongside controversies regarding local policies on gender identity, the handling of alleged assaults by illegal aliens, and legislative efforts to restrict law enforcement cooperation in deportations. The piece concludes that these actions represent a systemic threat to the rule of law and public safety, serving as a warning intended to mobilize conservative voters for upcoming state and national elections.
-
4.
The article argues that Maryland's new legislation represents a significant effort by Democratic lawmakers to impose heavy-handed government regulations on private education and parental rights, regardless of whether state funds are involved. Key evidence cited is the passage of bills like HB 649, which extends state nondiscrimination rules to private schools, mandating standards that critics argue violate religious freedom. The policy implication is that the most effective defense against educational overreach is not school choice funding, but the expansion of parental freedom and the building of a strong, organized coalition of parents to resist authoritarian government control.
-
5.
The article argues that despite public opposition and Supreme Court rulings against race-based admissions, the political Left continues employing what the author characterizes as discriminatory DEI policies to achieve racial preferences. Evidence cited includes Virginia's proposed HB 61 (mandating 42% of state contracts to minority/women-owned businesses with price-adjustment set-asides), declining Jewish enrollment at Harvard to 7% (lowest since WWII) following the 2023 Supreme Court decision, and the EU's Horizon Europe program ($100+ billion) conditioning research funding on DEI compliance. The Trump administration is pursuing legal challenges arguing these policies violate civil rights law and threaten to create a "balkanized" society with government-defined group rights.
-
6.Corporations Scoring High on Human Rights Campaign’s Equality Index Might Be Breaching Their Duty (Heritage)
The article argues that corporate managers may be breaching their fiduciary duties by adhering to the Human Rights Campaign’s (HRC) Corporate Equality Index, which promotes gender transition guidelines and identity-based policies. This alignment creates a material conflict with a recent executive order that defines sex as an immutable biological classification and restricts the promotion of gender ideology by federal contractors. Consequently, the author warns that corporations face significant legal and reputational risks if they prioritize HRC's social benchmarks over federal compliance and long-term shareholder interests.
-
7.
This article advocates for a robust U.S. strategy to support Iranian protesters, arguing that the current unrest presents a unique opportunity to topple the Islamic Republic and strike a blow against Chinese influence. The author contends that the regime's military weakness, exposed by recent U.S. strikes, and its economic failure have emboldened the populace despite Chinese-designed internet suppression tools. To assist the uprising, the piece suggests utilizing kinetic and cyberattacks against Iran's National Information Network to restore protester communications. Successfully weakening Tehran would undermine Beijing’s regional energy access and strategic foothold in the Middle East.
-
8.
The article contends that the Trump administration must initially assert federal supremacy through the Insurrection Act to dismantle local obstruction of immigration enforcement. It points to escalating violence and non-cooperation from municipal leaders in sanctuary cities as evidence that traditional ICE operations have become high-risk 'PR traps.' To sustain long-term mass deportation goals, the author suggests transitioning to a technology-centric approach that utilizes AI, facial recognition, and inter-agency data sharing to identify targets more subtly and efficiently. This strategy aims to bypass media-driven optics while restoring the normalization of federal law enforcement across the country.
-
9.
This article refutes recent media reports claiming a high rate of fund misuse in Arizona's Empowerment Scholarship Accounts (ESA) school choice program. The author argues that the reported 20% misspending rate is a gross exaggeration derived from a non-representative sample of transactions already flagged for audit. In reality, actual misspending is likely below 2% of total funds, a rate significantly lower than those found in other government programs like Medicaid or food stamps.
-
10.
The Heritage Foundation argues that reversing the EPA’s endangerment finding on greenhouse gases is a major deregulatory victory that removes the legal basis for over $1 trillion in compliance costs. The article contends that the original finding relied on flawed climate models and created a false choice between economic prosperity and environmental protection. By dismantling these regulations, the administration aims to unleash the U.S. energy sector while promoting a model of 'stewardship' that balances industrial growth with responsible conservation.
-
11.
Heritage argues that downsizing or closing the U.S. Department of Education would reduce compliance burdens and shift authority to states and localities, enabling more parent- and school-level decision-making. It cites past estimates of large federal administrative costs and contends that federal K-12 funding is a relatively small share of total spending, while student outcomes have remained weak under the current model. The report recommends converting Title I and IDEA into more flexible block grants or student-level micro-ESAs, expanding Ed-Flex waivers, increasing state-led transparency and assessment reforms, and tightening state civil-rights and DEI-related rules. Strategically, it implies states should stand up transition working groups, audit federal fund use, coordinate multistate legal and regulatory action, and prepare for interagency federal program handoffs as Washington’s education role contracts.
-
12.
The Heritage commentary argues that declining marriage and fertility rates pose a core national risk, citing a Congressional Budget Office projection that the U.S. population would begin shrinking by 2030 without immigration. It contends that family breakdown, not just economics, is driving long-term demographic and social decline, and that married two-parent households outperform alternatives across social and economic outcomes. The piece advocates a pro-family policy agenda including removing marriage penalties in welfare, expanding tax credits for married families, and using public recognition to reinforce marital stability. Strategically, it calls conservatives to prioritize family formation as a central domestic policy objective and rejects reliance on mass immigration as the primary demographic solution.
-
13.
The report argues that America’s long-term decline in marriage and fertility is a civilizational threat and that restoring stable married-parent families is essential to national renewal. It cites historical trends and social-science findings linking two-parent married households with better child outcomes, lower poverty and crime, and stronger economic and civic performance, while blaming welfare marriage penalties, cultural shifts, and institutional incentives for family breakdown. Strategically, it recommends a whole-of-government pro-family agenda: remove welfare and tax marriage penalties, strengthen work requirements, reduce regulatory and housing barriers, expand religion- and family-supportive policies, and create new marriage-centered incentives (FAM/HCE credits and NEST accounts). The implication is a shift from neutral or symptom-management policy toward explicit state preference for marriage and child-rearing within intact families as a national policy objective.