The article outlines how a successful modern foreign policy career requires blending traditional diplomatic expertise with private sector acumen. Juster's career trajectory—from international law to high-stakes diplomacy (e.g., the Gulf War) and subsequently to the technology sector—demonstrates this synthesis. Key evidence includes his work managing complex negotiations under duress and his involvement in co-founding the U.S.-India High Technology Group. The implication for policy is that effective geopolitical strategy must actively integrate private sector knowledge and technological considerations to manage modern economic and security challenges.
Nuclear
This topic hub groups ThinkTankWeekly entries tagged Nuclear and links readers back to the original publishers.
-
1.
-
2.
The analysis concludes that China will hold the upper hand at the upcoming Trump-Xi summit, leveraging its dominance over critical minerals, rare earths, and magnet supply chains. This geopolitical leverage, combined with global instability (such as the Iran conflict), allows Beijing to dictate terms and buy time to consolidate its technological and industrial self-sufficiency. Strategically, the U.S. must avoid granting China a managed equilibrium by maintaining 'maximum pressure' on key sectors like AI and tech, rather than seeking broad agreements that could undermine American leadership.
-
3.
The analysis cautions that the upcoming Trump-Xi summit must not result in short-term strategic concessions for the US, which risks undermining long-term stability. China is rapidly consolidating global power, leveraging US policy shifts and increasing its assertiveness across the Indo-Pacific and in technology. Strategically, the US must prioritize addressing the immediate crisis in Iran, where China holds significant leverage, and must also focus on joint cooperation on AI. Ultimately, the US must resist political impulses and pursue a robust strategy to counter China's growing challenge to global dominance.
-
4.
The article argues that China views the Iran conflict as a critical case study demonstrating that military victory is unnecessary for strategic success. Iran's ability to impose costs by choking the Strait of Hormuz and spiking energy markets proved that economic disruption can be a more potent form of warfare than conventional combat. Beijing plans to apply this 'coercion over conquest' model to the Indo-Pacific, suggesting that layered campaigns of maritime quarantine, cyber disruption, and financial pressure are optimal. This strategy aims not for immediate conquest, but for cumulative pressure designed to constrain U.S. decision-making and exhaust its resources across multiple theaters.
-
5.
The Trump-Xi summit achieved a delicate détente, establishing a baseline of 'decent peace' that prioritizes stability and commercial cooperation over major geopolitical breakthroughs. Key evidence includes agreements on energy, trade (e.g., Boeing aircraft, Nvidia chips), and regional issues like the Strait of Hormuz, while China repeatedly emphasized Taiwan as the most critical issue for future stability. Strategically, the relationship is now defined by managed competition, with the pending $14 billion arms package to Taiwan serving as the most consequential test of this new, fragile truce. The outcome of this arms deal, and whether it is used as a bargaining chip, will determine the limits of the current détente.
-
6.
The CFR argues that any US-China dialogue on AI safety must be narrowly scoped and coupled with a 'maximum pressure' campaign. Because China views AI cooperation primarily as a means to close its technological gap, the US cannot rely on Beijing's good faith and must maintain a significant technological lead. The recommended strategy is to tighten export controls to widen the US-China AI capability gap, thereby eliminating China's leverage and forcing Beijing to prioritize global AI safety. This approach preserves US leadership while creating the necessary structural conditions for long-term, enforceable safety agreements.
-
7.
The Chatham House analysis argues that 'maximum pressure' sanctions, especially those aimed at regime change, are inherently unstable and create a dangerous escalatory momentum toward military action. The evidence points to repeated failures—such as the decades-long sanctions on Cuba and the inability to topple the Venezuelan regime—demonstrating that sanctions alone are insufficient to achieve stated political goals. Consequently, the risk of military intervention is not limited to a single administration but is a systemic policy danger for any US government that implements punitive sanctions without a coherent strategy for de-escalation or negotiation. Policymakers must therefore view sanctions as a limited tool, ensuring they are paired with clear off-ramps to prevent unnecessary conflict.
-
8.
Despite rising global tensions and skepticism regarding formal arms control, the paper argues that avoiding a new nuclear arms race remains achievable. It analyzes the stability of four key nuclear relationships—including the US-Russia, US-China, and the N5 group—to assess the current risk landscape. The research provides concrete recommendations for states to manage these complex dynamics and prevent costly escalation. Ultimately, the findings emphasize that proactive diplomatic engagement is crucial to maintaining strategic stability, especially in the context of the NPT Review Conference.
-
9.
India's foreign policy is defined by 'multialignment,' a self-interested strategy of maintaining strong, non-ideological ties with multiple global powers rather than adhering to any single bloc. This strategy is evidenced by India's simultaneous deepening of partnerships with the US (e.g., defense cooperation) while maintaining independent, critical relationships with Russia and France. Consequently, India is a major proponent of a multipolar global order, advocating for greater representation in international institutions. For external powers, the implication is that attempts to force alignment will fail; instead, a nuanced approach that works with India to maximize mutual gains is necessary for effective policy engagement.
-
10.
India is strategically deepening its security cooperation with the United States and Indo-Pacific partners while rigorously maintaining its principle of strategic autonomy. Rather than joining formal, treaty-based alliances, India utilizes flexible, transactional partnerships to build material capacity and legitimacy, even while signaling concern about regional challenges like China's growing influence. This selective engagement allows New Delhi to maximize its geopolitical flexibility and avoid explicit confrontation, but it simultaneously strains relationships with partners who press for clearer alignment. Policymakers must recognize that India's foreign policy is defined by this careful balancing act, requiring sustained, nuanced diplomacy to manage its diversified ties (e.g., between the West and Russia).
-
11.
The CFR briefing concludes that the Trump-Xi summit established a fragile, symbolic détente rather than achieving substantive structural reform. This temporary stability is largely predicated on the mutual acknowledgment of critical vulnerabilities, particularly China's control over rare earth minerals and global supply chains, which previously forced a trade truce. While the talks reduced immediate escalation risk, the underlying structural threats—including technology dependence, market access issues, and geopolitical flashpoints like Taiwan—remain unaddressed. Policymakers must therefore focus on mitigating these persistent vulnerabilities rather than relying on the diplomatic breakthroughs suggested by the summit.
-
12.2026 International Affairs Fellowship Keynote With Ambassador Richard Verma: Geopolitical Challenges and the Path Forward (CFR)
Ambassador Verma argues that the U.S. foreign policy landscape is defined by intense great-power competition, regional conflicts (like the war in Ukraine), and persistent threats of terrorism. He posits that navigating these complex challenges requires a holistic, multi-sectoral approach that bridges traditional government expertise with private-sector economic insight. His own career, spanning military service, diplomacy, and the private sector, serves as evidence for the necessity of this breadth of experience. The key policy implication is the need for adaptive, resilient strategies that maintain global engagement while effectively managing geopolitical risks and economic security.
-
13.
The upcoming summit between Xi and Trump is unlikely to result in direct discussions or agreements regarding China's growing nuclear arsenal or US missile defense projects. Instead, the analysis suggests that strategic stability can be advanced by focusing on shared threat assessments in emerging domains, such as artificial intelligence and outer space. Progress can be made by establishing dialogue on AI risks in escalation and reaffirming commitments to keep AI out of nuclear launch decisions. This shift allows the superpowers to build confidence and manage strategic tensions without confronting immediate nuclear limits, thereby providing a pathway for dialogue.
-
14.
The article argues that President Trump's plan to withdraw U.S. troops from Europe is strategically beneficial, asserting that the U.S. presence acts as an unnecessary 'glue' that prevents natural European self-sufficiency. Proponents argue that Europe has fundamentally changed, possessing nuclear deterrents and the capacity for regional defense, making American military dominance obsolete. Withdrawal will incentivize European states to rapidly rearm and form natural regional blocs, thereby restoring a balance of power without requiring constant American subsidies. Furthermore, reducing U.S. bases in Europe is presented as a positive development, as it limits American power projection and potential involvement in the Middle East.
-
15.
The state visit signaled a desire for 'strategic stability' and economic cooperation, evidenced by China's agreement to purchase major U.S. goods. However, the summit highlighted deep geopolitical divergences, particularly regarding Taiwan and the Middle East (Iran). Beijing appears to be using economic engagement to buy time and forestall tariffs, while the U.S. is leveraging the relationship to manage the Iran conflict. Policymakers must anticipate continued strategic competition, as both nations will use upcoming multilateral forums, such as the G20, to manage their conflicting priorities and maintain influence.
-
16.
The Chatham House analysis argues that the upcoming Trump-Xi summit will focus on managing the US-China rivalry through transactional, short-term agreements rather than resolving deep structural competition. Both leaders are primarily constrained by domestic political pressures—Trump's election cycle and Xi's economic stability—leading them to prioritize immediate economic levers like trade purchases and technology access. While the US agenda is narrow and improvisational, China is leveraging its economic statecraft, particularly rare earth controls, to maintain an asymmetric stalemate. For policy makers, the report advises looking past immediate headlines, emphasizing that sustained data and execution on commitments, such as trade fulfillment, are more critical than the summit's stated outcomes.
-
17.
The article argues that Taiwan faces a critical and complex energy security challenge, intensified by global conflicts and its deep reliance on imported fossil fuels. This vulnerability is compounded by the exponential energy demands of its semiconductor industry, which underpins its strategic global value, and the geopolitical threat of resource cutoff from China. To mitigate risks, Taiwan is rapidly diversifying energy sources away from the Middle East and increasing storage capacity. Policy must therefore urgently balance massive industrial energy growth, climate transition goals, and geopolitical instability to ensure sustained national resilience.
-
18.
The article argues that the proposed 'Golden Dome' homeland missile defense project is fiscally unsound and strategically infeasible, citing a projected cost of $1.2 trillion that consumes a massive portion of the defense budget for limited defensive capability. It contends that such systems are unlikely to protect against advanced threats and could dangerously increase the risk of preemptive conflict. Instead of funding this costly infrastructure, policymakers should focus on pragmatic, proven methods to de-escalate tensions and deter the use of nuclear weapons, rather than attempting to 'win' a nuclear war.
-
19.
The Brookings article argues that Donald Trump's ambiguous comments regarding Taiwan—specifically suggesting that U.S. security support is negotiable leverage with China—dangerously undermine decades of established U.S. deterrence policy. By implying that Taiwan must 'cool down' and questioning the necessity of military intervention, Trump signals to Beijing that America's commitment is conditional. This shift from resolute deterrence to dealmaking will not reduce, but rather intensify, Chinese pressure on Taiwan. Therefore, the U.S. must maintain a consistent, unwavering focus on upholding stability in the Taiwan Strait and resist using Taiwan's security status as a bargaining chip with Beijing.
-
20.Malcolm Turnbull: AUKUS is ‘a huge wealth transfer from the Australian government to the US and the UK’ (Chatham House)
Malcolm Turnbull argues that the AUKUS security pact constitutes a 'huge wealth transfer' and a poor strategic decision for Australia. He criticizes the deal by citing logistical flaws, specifically noting that US naval yards cannot produce the required submarines at sufficient scale or speed. Furthermore, he points to the UK's shipbuilding industry being in 'complete disarray.' Strategically, Turnbull suggests that Australia would have been better positioned by maintaining its relationship with France to develop common defense platforms for Europe, rather than committing to the current trilateral arrangement.
-
21.
The article argues that Russia's recent public displays, such as the diminished Victory Day parade, reveal deep structural cracks in its power and stability. Key evidence includes the military hardware's absence, slowing economic growth, and internal security tensions exacerbated by infighting and digital crackdowns. For policy, the analysis suggests that while Russia remains a threat, its declining geopolitical influence, coupled with the strengthening and consolidating hard-power capabilities of Europe and NATO, indicates a long-term erosion of Moscow's global standing.
-
22.
The article argues that the U.S.-India partnership should shift its focus from judging each country's domestic democratic performance to jointly championing democratic norms within the global international order. While strategic convergence (especially concerning China) remains the primary driver, the U.S. must recognize that India's engagement is rooted in self-interest and multialignment, not ideology. Policy should therefore guide the U.S. to work with India's efforts to democratize global governance structures, particularly in technology and security architecture. This approach allows the U.S. to leverage India's unique position to build a democratic alternative to authoritarian models without creating bilateral friction.
-
23.
The article argues that China has matured into a full peer competitor to the United States in cyberspace, demonstrating capabilities across sophistication, scale, stealth, and strategy. Evidence points to China's deep penetration of U.S. critical infrastructure and its ability to mobilize a whole-of-society approach, including controlling the private sector's vulnerability supply chain. For policy, the US must abandon the concept of 'cyber deterrence' and instead adopt a reinvigorated, multi-domain strategy that strengthens its own cyber defenses, revitalizes its institutions, and develops clear, cross-domain responses to Chinese malicious activity.
-
24.
The summit did not result in major breakthroughs but rather a return to managed stability in U.S.-China relations. Key outcomes include the establishment of a 'Board of Trade' and a 'Board of Investment,' which experts view as structural continuations of previous dialogues rather than radical new commitments. The discussions focused on managing existing trade flows and extending ceasefires, allowing China to maintain its economic status quo without making significant concessions. Strategically, this suggests that the U.S. must adjust its policy away from demanding fundamental systemic changes and instead focus on managing these stable, yet limited, bilateral agreements.
-
25.
The U.S.-China rivalry is defined by a state of 'mutually assured disruption,' where technological competition (semiconductor controls vs. rare earth embargoes) creates an unstable equilibrium. While the U.S. maintains a lead in AI frontier model development, China holds an advantage in deployment speed and cost, suggesting rough parity. Policy efforts should focus on immediate, proactive dialogue regarding AI safety and non-proliferation, drawing parallels to Cold War treaties. Crucially, any safety negotiations must be conducted while simultaneously tightening technological loopholes to maintain strategic leverage and prevent being outmaneuvered.
-
26.
The article argues that the concept of great power spheres of influence has evolved beyond traditional military boundaries, now manifesting in functional domains like critical technology and digital infrastructure. This shift allows powerful states, such as China, to consolidate an 'open sphere' by leveraging economic and technological influence, particularly if the United States makes unilateral concessions or is strategically distracted. The author warns that the U.S.'s willingness to make policy concessions regarding Taiwan and its diminishing reliability as a security guarantor could hasten China's consolidation of influence in the Indo-Pacific. Strategically, this necessitates that Washington update its understanding of modern spheres to prevent a major geopolitical division that could escalate into conflict.
-
27.Iran’s Plan to Charge for Strait of Hormuz Transits Could Spread to Other Regions, Experts Warn (USNI)
Maritime experts warn that Iran's push to charge fees or impose controls on Strait of Hormuz transits sets a dangerous global precedent for maritime choke points. This 'tollbooth model' threatens the fundamental principle of freedom of navigation, raising concerns that other nations could replicate similar restrictions in key global waterways. The resulting instability poses a systemic risk to global trade and energy supplies, forcing international actors to prepare for potential long-term disruptions and the need to secure alternative supply routes.
-
28.
This RAND report develops a scenario-planning framework to analyze the complex future mental health landscape of the UK Armed Forces community through 2045. The analysis identifies key stressors, including the evolving character of conflict, geopolitical uncertainty, and broader societal trends like increased mental health awareness and technological disruption. The core finding is that the sector must move beyond reactive care, requiring proactive, collaborative strategic planning across military, NHS, and third-sector organizations. Ultimately, the report stresses the need for adaptable and resilient support systems to meet the unique and growing mental health needs of personnel and veterans.
-
29.
The article argues that China has significantly increased its leverage over the United States, constraining Washington's ability to set its own national security agenda. This shift is evidenced by the U.S. ceding authority over its own national security measures, such as export controls, in exchange for easing trade tensions following the 2025 trade war. Furthermore, China is successfully linking areas of cooperation and difference, forcing the U.S. to prioritize diplomatic optics over substantive policy goals. The implication is that Washington's decision-making is now constrained by Beijing, potentially emboldening China to test American resolve on vital interests like Taiwan and advanced technology.
-
30.
The article argues that the U.S.-China relationship is defined by a long-term, multifaceted strategic competition, which China views through a historical lens of achieving self-sufficiency and resisting foreign leverage. Beijing's approach is characterized by deep strategic planning, leading it to resist fundamental structural economic changes despite seeking temporary, mutually advantageous agreements. For policy, the analysis warns that the greatest risk lies not in disagreement, but in the misunderstanding or ambiguous interpretation of agreements following high-level summits. Therefore, managing the relationship requires both powers to clearly articulate their core, long-term objectives to prevent temporary stabilization from obscuring deep strategic divergence.
-
31.
The article argues that traditional, brute-force anti-cartel strategies are ineffective and often backfire, empowering criminal groups rather than eliminating them. Instead, the U.S. should adopt a policy of "conditional repression," which involves setting clear red lines and applying severe pressure only when cartels cross them (e.g., through fentanyl trafficking or violence). This targeted approach aims to coerce cartels into reducing their most pernicious harms—such as extortion and environmental damage—while minimizing collateral damage. The U.S. should lead this shift, encouraging Latin American partners to adopt similar conditional strategies to stabilize the region.
-
32.
While US instability creates a theoretical geostrategic vacuum for China, the article argues that Beijing's ability to capitalize on this opportunity is limited. Global powers are increasingly adopting a 'hedging' strategy, seeking to reduce vulnerability to both US and Chinese influence, suggesting the competition is not zero-sum. China faces specific hurdles, including deep skepticism in Europe (due to Russia ties and trade issues) and poor returns on its soft power investments. Consequently, the global balance of power is shifting, but the primary implication is that both the US and China risk losing global influence as nations prioritize strategic balancing over alignment.
-
33.
The analysis concludes that any future nuclear deal with Iran must fundamentally differ from the 2015 JCPOA, as Iran's capabilities have advanced significantly since the treaty's inception. Key evidence shows that Iran has improved its centrifuge technology and installation speed, shifting the threat from merely enriching uranium to rapidly achieving weaponization. Consequently, a viable policy strategy must mandate comprehensive oversight, requiring Iran to fully implement the Additional Protocol and allowing inspectors access to military and non-nuclear research sites to monitor both fissile material production and covert weaponization activities.
-
34.
The Chief of Naval Operations estimates that the U.S. submarine industrial base is on track to achieve a production rate of two Virginia-class attack submarines annually by 2032. This acceleration is predicated on significant investments in the workforce, distributed construction, and partnerships between major shipbuilders. Achieving this high build rate is strategically critical, as it supports the U.S. commitment to the AUKUS security pact by ensuring sufficient submarines can be sold to Australia in the 2030s. Furthermore, the Navy is actively studying foreign shipbuilding designs to rapidly improve domestic construction efficiency and capacity.
-
35.
The Trump administration’s decision to pull five thousand troops from Germany, alongside the potential cancellation of Tomahawk cruise missiles slated for deployment in 2027, poses a significant threat to European security and NATO deterrence. This move, driven by a desire to punish European criticism of the Iran war, exacerbates existing issues including depleted U.S. stockpiles due to the ongoing conflict and delayed deliveries of critical defense systems like NASAMS and HIMARS. The potential loss of the Tomahawk missiles, intended to counter Russian missiles, further weakens European defenses and highlights a growing credibility gap for U.S. deterrence. Ultimately, these actions contribute to a more vulnerable security environment for U.S. allies in Europe.
-
36.
The ongoing Iran war shock has highlighted the vulnerability of global energy markets and underscored the urgent need for accelerated energy innovation. CFR’s new Global Energy Innovation Index reveals that innovation efforts have stagnated, particularly in areas like renewable energy adoption and patenting, leading to limited options for responding to crises. The article emphasizes that necessity drives invention, exemplified by fuel-switching measures and stockpile releases, but stresses the importance of sustained government investment in research and development alongside private sector innovation. Ultimately, a renewed focus on energy innovation, particularly in areas like geothermal and advanced energy storage, is crucial to mitigating future disruptions and ensuring long-term energy security.
-
37.
A recent CSIS analysis of the U.S.-Iran conflict highlights how Iran effectively countered U.S. battlefield successes through a sophisticated information war campaign utilizing deepfakes, false claims, and narratives exploiting American skepticism towards foreign intervention. The report emphasizes that simply achieving military victory is insufficient; maintaining public trust and shaping the narrative are crucial. To counter this, the U.S. needs to proactively rebuild public diplomacy, establish rapid response information warfare task forces, and prioritize speed and transparency in communication to establish a dominant narrative and expose disinformation networks.
-
38.
The recent Israeli strikes on Beirut, marking the first since a ceasefire announcement, significantly undermines efforts to establish a stable peace in Lebanon and highlights the fragility of the nascent truce. The attacks, targeting a Hezbollah commander, demonstrate that ongoing conflict remains a major obstacle to a regional peace deal, particularly as Iran explores U.S. proposals. Furthermore, escalating tensions in the region, evidenced by continued U.S. military assessments of damage to facilities and shifting U.S. strategic priorities (including reduced reliance on regional partners), underscore the need for a diplomatic resolution. This situation demands a renewed focus on de-escalation and a return to direct negotiations between key parties to prevent further instability.
-
39.
Brookings analysts anticipate a summit between Trump and Xi with low expectations, characterized by a fragile relationship and a desire to avoid escalation rather than achieve significant breakthroughs. While both leaders seek to maintain a trade truce and avoid conflict, risks remain, particularly concerning tariff restorations and potential shifts in U.S. policy on Taiwan. The meeting's significance lies in its role as a crucial communication channel to prevent miscalculation, and there's a potential for discussions on AI safety and cooperation, though deeper issues like talent competition and fentanyl remain unresolved.
-
40.
This CFR analysis details a shift in U.S. military deployment in Europe, driven by tensions surrounding the Iran conflict and President Trump’s disagreements with European allies. The U.S. is reducing its troop presence, aiming for pre-Ukraine war levels, with a planned withdrawal of approximately 5,000 troops from Germany. Despite this drawdown, the U.S. maintains a significant military footprint across Europe, primarily through the Enhanced Forward Presence (EFP) in Eastern European NATO countries and ongoing training exercises. These deployments focus on forward defense, logistics, and training allied forces, particularly in support of Ukraine’s defense. The analysis highlights the continued importance of U.S. forces in bolstering NATO’s security posture and managing nuclear assets within the alliance.
-
41.
The conflict in Iran presents a mixed strategic picture for Beijing, offering diplomatic opportunities by allowing China to position itself as a neutral mediator and distracting the U.S. from the Indo-Pacific. However, these gains are offset by significant economic instability, energy market volatility, and the exposure of China's limited operational reach in the region. Strategically, Beijing's primary concern remains maintaining stability with the U.S. to ensure its continued rise, leading it to prioritize de-escalation over deep regional involvement. Ultimately, China must navigate the tension between asserting regional influence and mitigating the severe economic risks posed by disrupted global supply chains.
-
42.
The anticipated Trump-Xi summit is expected to center on extending the existing trade truce, with the U.S. seeking large-scale Chinese purchases of goods and China aiming to preserve access to U.S. technology. Beyond trade, Beijing will subtly press for rhetorical concessions on Taiwan and the adoption of a 'mutual respect' framework, signaling an implicit acceptance of China's core interests. The outcome is highly significant, as it will define the U.S.-China relationship trajectory, determining whether the relationship settles into stable, managed cooperation or escalates into deeper strategic tension across global issues like AI and the Middle East.
-
43.
According to a CSIS press briefing, the upcoming Trump-Xi summit, delayed by six weeks, aims to address five U.S. priorities ("the five Bs") and three Chinese priorities ("the three Ts") including Taiwan, tariffs, and technology. China enters the meeting in a stronger position due to recent U.S. actions and a perceived improvement in its relative power, and is likely to pressure the U.S. regarding Taiwan, potentially seeking changes to U.S. policy on arms sales and transit for Taiwanese leaders. The briefing suggests China is well-prepared and confident, while the U.S. lacks a unified approach and is not adequately investing in its long-term economic foundations.
-
44.
This CFR analysis argues that the recent conflict with Iran offers three key lessons for nuclear security negotiations. First, military strikes alone are insufficient to dismantle a sophisticated nuclear program, as demonstrated by the limited impact of air attacks and the ongoing challenges faced by the IAEA. Second, reliance on force can incentivize concealment of nuclear activities, hindering transparency and inspection efforts. Finally, the conflict highlighted the inherent disparities within the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), particularly regarding access to nuclear technology for nations that did not initially test weapons. Consequently, negotiators should aim for ‘better-than-nothing’ deals, focusing on reaffirming the NPT’s core bargain and establishing a framework for continued dialogue and inspection, even if complete disarmament remains elusive.
-
45.
This Foreign Affairs article argues that the recent flurry of diplomatic visits by Western leaders to China is largely driven by a strategic hedging response to former President Trump’s increasingly adversarial relationship with the United States and its allies. Faced with what they perceive as a predatory U.S. foreign policy, countries like Canada, France, and others are seeking to maintain channels of communication with China to avoid being fully aligned with Washington. However, this approach risks legitimizing China’s authoritarianism and reinforcing Beijing’s narrative of a rising global power. The article calls for greater coordination among Western allies, setting clear redlines, and a more assertive approach from the U.S. to deter coercive behavior and safeguard shared interests, particularly regarding technological advantage and supply chain diversification.
-
46.
The development of superintelligence, exemplified by DeepMind's work, represents a transformative, dual-use technology comparable to nuclear power, promising massive gains in fields like medicine (e.g., AlphaFold). The analysis highlights that while pioneers like Demis Hassabis approach AI from a fundamental scientific motivation, the race dynamic makes global safety governance challenging. Strategically, the findings suggest that emerging markets view AI as a primary engine for development, contrasting with the caution seen in advanced economies due to job displacement fears. Policymakers must therefore focus on guiding AI development toward applications with clear human benefits to ensure global acceptance and manage the inherent risks of this powerful new technology.
-
47.
This CFR analysis argues that Trump’s ‘Project Freedom’ – primarily a naval escort operation and blockade – will fail to open the Strait of Hormuz and resolve the ongoing conflict with Iran. The strategy relies on overly optimistic assumptions about Iran’s economic vulnerability and the immediate impact of a blockade, while failing to account for Iran’s resilience and ability to adapt through alternative trade routes. Evidence suggests Iran’s continued capacity to attack commercial vessels and retaliate underscores the futility of force-based approaches. Ultimately, a diplomatic solution remains the only viable path forward, despite the current impasse.
-
48.
Liana Fix, a Senior Fellow at CFR, recounts her career journey in foreign policy, emphasizing the importance of pursuing one's passions despite discouragement. Her experiences, from studying war in a pacifist Germany to living in Russia and the US, highlight the disconnect between conventional wisdom and geopolitical realities. Fix's career trajectory underscores the value of intellectual curiosity, courage in voicing original ideas, and the evolving nature of European security, particularly Germany's shift towards rearmament in response to Russia's actions and broader geopolitical changes.
-
49.
The CSIS report argues that the U.S. and South Korea must significantly strengthen their cyber cooperation to effectively deter and respond to escalating threats from North Korea, China, and Russia. It proposes a new, integrated framework emphasizing shared situational awareness, improved attribution, and proactive cyber defense, including a Cyberattack Severity Classification Framework (CSCF) to standardize decision-making. The report stresses aligning cyber policy with broader diplomatic, financial, and law enforcement tools to enhance overall resilience. This necessitates a shift beyond reactive measures towards a more comprehensive and coordinated approach.
-
50.
A CSIS report argues that despite increased speculation and geopolitical pressures, Japan and South Korea are unlikely to develop nuclear weapons in the foreseeable future. The analysis highlights deeply ingrained domestic political and bureaucratic constraints, as well as a continued reliance on the U.S. security umbrella, as primary deterrents. While concerns about U.S. commitment and regional instability may fuel debate, the costs and risks associated with nuclear proliferation remain significant obstacles. This suggests policymakers should focus on strengthening alliance commitments and addressing regional security concerns through non-nuclear means.
-
51.China will benefit from the Iran war, regardless of any deal between Trump and Tehran (Chatham House)
The war in Iran is unlikely to establish China as a direct replacement for the US as the Gulf's security provider, but it is accelerating the region's strategic shift away from absolute reliance on American guarantees. This dynamic allows China to gain influence by positioning itself as a diplomatic and technological partner, rather than a military guarantor. Gulf states are diversifying their defense procurement and seeking alternative regional stability models. Consequently, China is well-positioned to promote its own normative framework for regional cooperation, making its principles appealing to nations seeking stability without US-centric security commitments.
-
52.Beyond ‘clean’ versus ‘cheap’: The energy and growth strategy that states and regions are missing (Brookings)
The article argues that states are failing to capitalize on the energy transition by adopting a false dichotomy between 'clean' or 'cheap' energy. The core finding is that energy must be viewed not merely as a commodity cost, but as a strategic lever for industrial and economic transformation. This shift is underpinned by technological evidence, including the exponential cost declines of renewables and the rise of distributed energy resources (DERs). Policy implications suggest that the most critical resource is demand-side flexibility and efficiency, which offers a cheaper and faster path to capacity than building new centralized infrastructure. Therefore, states must adopt a new operating model that co-evolves economic development with the energy system by rewarding efficiency as a core industrial resource.
-
53.
A CFR analysis published in 2026 assesses the military campaign in the Iran War as largely ineffective in achieving strategic objectives. Despite significant damage inflicted on Iranian conventional weapons and naval capabilities, Iran continues to control vital waterways like the Strait of Hormuz and launch attacks, demonstrating a resilience that undermines the campaign’s success. The analysis highlights a crucial distinction between the ‘war of destruction’ – where the US Air Force achieved relative success – and a ‘war of disruption’ focused on countering Iranian drone and missile attacks, which the US has struggled with, leading to continued disruption of maritime traffic. Ultimately, the report concludes that Iran has effectively won the air war that matters most, highlighting the limitations of airpower in complex asymmetric conflicts.
-
54.
President Trump has paused the U.S. military’s Hormuz shipping mission, citing progress in negotiations with Iran and a desire to facilitate a final agreement. This decision follows escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, including attacks on U.S.-flagged vessels and heightened concerns over Iranian nuclear activity. The move reflects a strategic shift towards prioritizing a diplomatic resolution, although the U.S. maintains a naval blockade. Rising energy prices, exacerbated by the situation in the Persian Gulf, are a significant consequence of this policy change, highlighting the vulnerability of global energy markets to geopolitical instability. This action underscores a renewed focus on diplomacy within the Middle East, particularly concerning Iran.
-
55.
France’s deployment of its Carrier Strike Group (CSG) to the Middle East, spearheaded by the Charles de Gaulle, reflects a strategic effort to bolster maritime security amid heightened tensions and the ongoing conflict between the U.S., Israel, and Iran. This move, part of a multinational coalition with the UK, aims to reassure commercial shipping operators, conduct mine clearance operations, and provide crisis exit options. The deployment underscores France’s commitment to maintaining a defensive posture and contributing to stability in a volatile region, particularly concerning the Strait of Hormuz. France’s actions are supported by a broader European effort, Operation Aspides, and involve collaboration with nations like Italy and the Netherlands, demonstrating a coordinated response to protect maritime trade routes.
-
56.
A recent U.S. Army test successfully launched a Tomahawk cruise missile 390 miles to a target in the Philippines, demonstrating the capability to strike key locations within the first island chain. This test utilized the Mid-Range Capability, a system designed to deploy SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles for extended maritime strikes, and was conducted as part of ongoing exercises to deter potential aggression from China. The deployment of U.S. missile systems in the Philippines, particularly near Fort Magsaysay, has heightened tensions with Beijing and underscores the U.S. military’s strategy to contest Chinese influence in the region. This test validates the Army's MDTF capabilities and highlights the importance of strategic positioning within the first island chain.
-
57.China's Science and Technology Strategy in Perspective: Historical Evolution, Political Drivers, and Global Implications (RAND)
This RAND report analyzes China's evolving science and technology (S&T) strategy, highlighting a shift towards centralized, CCP-led innovation emphasizing technological self-reliance and integration with national security goals. Key findings include the strategic importance of S&T for China's power projection, the rise of military-civil fusion, and a move away from reliance on foreign technology. The report underscores the need for policymakers to understand China's approach to S&T, balancing collaboration with safeguards for research integrity and national security.
-
58.Force Multipliers in the Americas: Harnessing Security Force Assistance to Bolster Homeland Defense and U.S. Strategic Objectives in Latin America (RAND)
This RAND report, published in 2026, argues that the U.S. Department of War can effectively leverage security force assistance (SFA) activities in Latin America to bolster homeland defense, counter transnational threats, and advance U.S. strategic influence. The report highlights the increasing convergence of threats from state adversaries and non-state actors, emphasizing the need for innovative SFA approaches, particularly utilizing the Army Security Cooperation Group—South and National Guard State Partnership Programs. Ultimately, the report suggests that targeted SFA can be a cost-effective tool for addressing regional challenges and countering Chinese influence.
-
59.
The article argues that outer space is vulnerable to disruption, mirroring how a limited force can destabilize a vital choke point like the Strait of Hormuz. This risk is amplified because most operational satellites are located in Low Earth Orbit (LEO), a region susceptible to anti-satellite weapons and debris creation. To protect the burgeoning space economy and maintain freedom of passage, the U.S. must prioritize diplomatic engagement with China and Russia to establish modern space governance. Strategically, the U.S. should also invest in technologies for debris mitigation and reassess its military reliance on LEO, thereby avoiding a potential conflict requiring superior military force.
-
60.
The U.S. must strategically leverage advanced technologies like AI and quantum computing to maintain scientific leadership and national competitiveness. The federal government is pursuing initiatives, such as the Genesis Mission, to accelerate scientific discovery and solidify American technological advantage. This effort requires significant federal investment and a focus on translating basic research into practical, mission-critical applications. Policymakers must therefore balance aggressive domestic development with strategic global collaboration to secure scientific and economic superiority in the coming decades.
-
61.
The article analyzes Kash Patel's defamation lawsuit, arguing that the case is highly likely to fail due to the stringent legal standard of "actual malice." This standard requires plaintiffs to prove the defendant's subjective state of mind—that they *knew* the statement was false or acted with *reckless disregard*—a burden the law does not make easy to meet. The author systematically dismantles Patel's claims, demonstrating that the law does not require journalists to be reasonable, conduct exhaustive investigations, or provide opportunities for comment. Strategically, this legal framework effectively shields media outlets, implying that public figures face an almost insurmountable barrier to achieving legal redress for defamation.
-
62.
Germany's 'Zeitenwende' signals a profound shift from economic influence to strategic military leadership, positioning it as an increasingly assertive and unavoidable power in Europe. While substantial funding and procurement (e.g., F-35s, special funds) demonstrate political intent, the article argues that this rearmament risks outpacing strategic coherence. Key challenges include persistent deficiencies in the Bundeswehr's readiness, the lack of a unified military doctrine, and deep institutional inertia. For Germany to successfully assume a leading role, it must overcome these internal structural hurdles—including its risk-averse economic model and political fragmentation—to translate resources into usable, deployable force.
-
63.
The analysis concludes that despite ongoing high-level purges, China's People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is undergoing a massive, deliberate, and highly successful modernization effort, making it a formidable military force. Key evidence points to the PLA's exponential growth in budget and capabilities—including missile, cyber, and maritime assets—and the purges themselves are viewed as Xi Jinping's serious effort to ensure the military's absolute loyalty to the Party and to him. Strategically, this indicates that China is building a force capable of presenting challenges to the U.S. military that have not been seen since World War II, necessitating a serious reassessment of US Indo-Pacific military policy.
-
64.
Emanuel argues that America's internal political divisions and systemic failures are its greatest strategic vulnerability, potentially overshadowing geopolitical challenges like China. Regarding the Middle East, he labels the current conflict with Iran a 'war of choice' and outlines a multi-phase strategy to stabilize the region. This plan involves immediately ensuring the free passage through the Strait of Hormuz, followed by establishing UN oversight and redefining the Abraham Accords. Ultimately, the U.S. must leverage these accords as a financing and infrastructure vehicle to bypass the Strait, thereby undermining Iran's regional leverage and securing long-term economic stability.
-
65.
The Brookings report argues that deep energy system integration across the EU and with neighboring states is essential for navigating the energy trilemma—balancing security, affordability, and sustainability. This integration enhances security by allowing cross-border transfers to buffer supply shocks, while it boosts sustainability and affordability by optimizing the management of intermittent renewable sources like wind and solar. To realize these benefits, policymakers must undertake massive investments in cross-border infrastructure and, critically, address the political and social challenges of cost allocation and loss of local control. Ultimately, sustained political will is required to overcome these hurdles, transforming a more integrated energy system into a core driver of European growth and strategic autonomy.
-
66.
Trump has rejected Iran's peace overtures and vowed to maintain the U.S. naval blockade, arguing that sustained pressure is necessary to force Tehran into a nuclear agreement. Experts concur that controlling the Strait of Hormuz is the primary strategic objective, as this leverage is essential to deter Iran's nuclear ambitions and stabilize the region. The continued blockade and potential military strikes are therefore viewed as the most critical policy tools to manage the conflict, despite the escalating financial and military costs. This suggests that the U.S. strategy remains focused on economic strangulation and military deterrence rather than immediate diplomatic resolution.
-
67.
Pakistan has undergone a significant geopolitical pivot, transforming from a pariah state into an indispensable mediator in major regional conflicts, notably facilitating talks between the US and Iran. This shift is driven by Pakistan's ability to deepen regional alliances (e.g., with Saudi Arabia and Turkey) and its strategic value as a resource hub (rare earths). Consequently, major global powers, including the US and Western democracies, are increasingly willing to overlook human rights concerns to leverage Islamabad's diplomatic contacts and geographic position. Policymakers should recognize Pakistan's growing role as a critical, albeit complex, node for future diplomatic and economic engagement across South Asia and the Middle East.
-
68.
Türkiye is undergoing a profound strategic shift to achieve defense-industrial autonomy by building a sophisticated, multi-layered missile arsenal. This transformation is evidenced by a twin-track approach that combines limited foreign imports with aggressive domestic development of both ballistic and cruise missiles. Key advancements include extending missile ranges far beyond initial capabilities and enabling diverse, multi-platform strike options through domestic engine development. This rapid build-up significantly enhances Türkiye's strategic deterrent capabilities, reducing reliance on NATO guarantees and projecting power across wider regional areas.
-
69.
Major General Lervik argues that landpower is essential for deterrence, arguing that Norway's strategic location and the heightened threat from Russia necessitate a fundamental shift in defense posture. The key evidence for this change is the realization of Russia's aggressive capabilities, particularly following the invasion of Ukraine, which has led to a unanimous parliamentary decision to more than double defense spending and significantly expand military capacity. Strategically, this mandates that the Norwegian Army focus on robust homeland defense while also taking greater responsibility for the entire Nordic region, thereby reinforcing NATO's collective security commitment in the face of geopolitical tension.
-
70.
The Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) has mandated that U.S. Naval Aviators will no longer command amphibious warships starting in Fiscal Year 2028. This strategic shift is driven by persistent issues with amphibious ship readiness and operational availability, requiring command expertise that aligns more closely with surface warfare specialization. By transferring command authority to Surface Warfare Officers, the Navy aims to leverage specialized knowledge in complex maintenance and amphibious operations, thereby improving command stability and overall platform readiness. This restructuring signals a broader effort to optimize command assignments by matching specific platform requirements with the most relevant professional expertise, while the service also reviews the deep draft requirement for carrier commanders.
-
71.
The article argues that the rapidly expanding nuclear capabilities of China, coupled with its refusal to engage in arms control talks, are replacing the bipolar nuclear order with a destabilizing tripolar dynamic. Beijing views a strong deterrent as stabilizing, while the U.S. responds by strengthening its own forces and avoiding treaties that exclude China. This escalating arms race, further complicated by Russia's involvement, is creating an anarchic international security environment. To de-escalate, both powers must move beyond rhetoric and increase concrete transparency, particularly regarding short-range nuclear capabilities, to defuse acute regional risks.
-
72.
Russia maintains a vast and rapidly modernizing nuclear arsenal, which it uses to deter Western military intervention and challenge U.S. strategic superiority. Key evidence points to Russia's diversification into dual-capable systems, hypersonic glide vehicles, and counter-space weapons, complicating traditional deterrence. These novel capabilities severely challenge U.S. ability to detect and characterize an inbound attack, particularly following the expiration of the New START Treaty. Consequently, the report advises Congress to urgently reassess U.S. deterrence and risk reduction policies, including considering future arms control frameworks.
-
73.
The article argues that continued maximalist diplomacy has failed, necessitating a comprehensive 'golden bridge' of compromise for lasting U.S.-Iran peace. This framework requires the U.S. to acknowledge Iran's right to peaceful nuclear development while Iran agrees to strict international oversight. Key to the deal is establishing a regional fund, financed by surcharges on goods transiting the Strait of Hormuz, which would finance reconstruction efforts across the Gulf. Implementing this compromise would stabilize the region, normalize relations, and provide a viable alternative to escalating military conflict.
-
74.
The article argues that decades of U.S. policy aimed at denuclearizing North Korea have failed, allowing the regime to successfully accelerate its nuclear program and solidify its rule. North Korea has skillfully leveraged shifting geopolitics, bolstering ties with China and Russia, which has rendered previous containment strategies obsolete. Consequently, the U.S. must abandon the goal of complete denuclearization and instead craft a new, pragmatic strategy focused on 'managing' the threat to achieve a stable, albeit cold, peace on the Korean Peninsula.
-
75.U.S. Navy Declares Initial Operational Capability for Modified P-8 A Poseidon Patrol Aircraft (USNI)
The U.S. Navy has declared Initial Operational Capability (IOC) for the P-8A Poseidon Increment 3 Block 2, significantly enhancing its maritime intelligence, surveillance, and targeting (ISR&T) capabilities. These advanced platforms are being utilized by allies, such as New Zealand, to conduct patrols in the Yellow and East China Seas to monitor North Korean sanctions evasion. While these joint surveillance efforts enforce international mandates, they have escalated geopolitical friction, prompting China to protest the operations as 'harassment' that threatens its sovereignty. This trend indicates a sustained increase in high-end maritime surveillance operations in the Indo-Pacific, raising the risk of miscalculation between major powers.
-
76.
The primary threat to Taiwan is not a traditional military invasion, but rather a sophisticated 'gray zone' coercion utilizing economic and logistical control, such as establishing a quarantine over maritime and air links. China is leveraging this control to restrict key exports, particularly advanced semiconductor components, thereby forcing regional compliance without triggering a full-scale conflict. Consequently, the U.S. must shift its strategic focus from preparing for military war games to developing integrated economic and diplomatic plans with allies. Deterring a severe financial and political crisis requires pre-coordinated responses to cushion market shocks and manage potential partial decoupling from China.
-
77.
The article argues that external military pressure, such as the U.S.-Israeli war, intended to topple the Iranian regime has paradoxically strengthened it by allowing hard-line elements to consolidate power. Instead of collapsing due to internal economic and political discontent, the regime leveraged the crisis to centralize authority, empowering the IRGC and adopting a more aggressive, militarized posture. Policymakers should abandon the assumption that Iran is a brittle, leader-centric state susceptible to rapid collapse. Continued intervention risks hardening the regime's resolve, increasing its nuclear capabilities, and making it less predictable and more dangerous to regional stability.
-
78.
The RAND report finds that Indiana possesses numerous flexible policy options for addressing cannabis, ranging from simple decriminalization to full adult-use legalization, and is not restricted to models used by neighboring states. Key evidence suggests that while current enforcement costs are substantial, legalizing the market could generate significant state tax revenue (estimated around $180 million annually under certain scenarios). For policy strategy, the report recommends that Indiana consider a gradual and flexible approach—such as initially limiting product types or incorporating sunset provisions—to manage the transition and minimize regulatory risk.
-
79.
General Dynamics reports that the first Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine is now tracking for a 2028 delivery, a timeline critical for maintaining the U.S. nuclear deterrent posture. This acceleration, which corrects a previous delay, is attributed to significant improvements in supplier efficiency and shipyard construction processes. The timely deployment of this SSBN is a top priority for the Pentagon, which is already planning substantial follow-on funding and negotiating massive contracts for future submarine production. The update highlights the ongoing industrial effort required to sustain advanced military capabilities.
-
80.
While Turkey seeks to maintain neutrality during the Iran conflict to prevent regional chaos and protect its borders, the article argues that this passive stance is insufficient to ensure its security. Turkey's geopolitical vulnerability is highlighted by external pressures, particularly Israel's expanding regional dominance, which risks encircling Ankara. Therefore, Turkey must move beyond mere non-involvement and adopt a proactive diplomatic strategy. Its primary goal should be to negotiate a durable, constrained settlement for Iran—similar to the JCPOA—that limits its nuclear and missile programs without causing state collapse, thereby stabilizing the region and preserving Turkey's strategic influence.
-
81.
The analysis concludes that while an indefinite ceasefire has temporarily paused hostilities, a lasting resolution to the Iran conflict is highly improbable due to fundamental, irreconcilable differences between the US and the Iranian regime. Key sticking points include the Iranian control over the vital Strait of Hormuz and the regime's insistence on its nuclear enrichment capabilities, which the US demands be curtailed by a lengthy moratorium. Consequently, the conflict remains strategically volatile; if diplomatic negotiations fail to bridge these deep divides, the region is likely to revert to an active military phase, maintaining significant geopolitical risk.
-
82.Iran, Pope, Economy: How many battles can Trump fight at once? Independent Thinking podcast (Chatham House)
The podcast analyzes the complex intersection of geopolitical flashpoints, US domestic politics, and global economic stability. Key discussions center on the volatile situation in Iran, potential Strait of Hormuz blockades, and the broader health of the global economy, framed against the backdrop of US midterm election preparations. The panel argues that the US faces the challenge of managing multiple, simultaneous crises—ranging from regional conflicts to economic downturns—which complicates strategic decision-making. Policy implications suggest that the US must balance aggressive diplomatic engagement in the Middle East with managing internal political divisions and global financial pressures.
-
83.
The analysis argues that while U.S. sanctions are powerful tools for geopolitical leverage, they inevitably generate unintended loopholes, exemplified by the 'shadow fleet.' Enforcement strategies must be highly tailored, ranging from the banking-focused 'carrot and stick' model used against Iran, to the price-cap mechanism implemented against Russia. This shift demonstrates that modern sanctions must balance punitive goals with the critical need to maintain global energy market stability. Policymakers must therefore design sophisticated regimes that prevent market shocks while achieving strategic objectives.
-
84.
The article argues that the U.S. naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is a high-risk gamble unlikely to succeed in coercing Iran into accepting U.S. terms. While the blockade aims to trigger an economic collapse, the analysis notes that Iran has demonstrated resilience, and the global energy market remains highly vulnerable to escalation. Furthermore, the U.S. faces significant domestic political backlash and the risk of a direct military confrontation with Iran or China. Consequently, the authors suggest that the potential for catastrophic global economic fallout outweighs the strategic benefits, making the current policy unsustainable.
-
85.
The Brookings article argues that any temporary nuclear deal with Iran is fundamentally flawed and dangerous. The core reasoning is that such agreements imply that the Iranian regime's moderation is predictable, which is an unreliable hope, and they undermine the permanent, global nature of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Furthermore, temporary limits send dangerous signals to both Iranian hardliners and regional rivals, suggesting that a nuclear option is permissible. Policy should therefore reject time-bound limitations, focusing instead on establishing permanent compliance mechanisms and robust international monitoring to manage the nuclear program.
-
86.
The article argues that Section 702 is an indispensable intelligence asset, crucial for thwarting modern threats including terrorism, cybercrime, and foreign espionage. Its effectiveness is evidenced by its proven ability to provide actionable intelligence on state and non-state actors, despite ongoing privacy concerns regarding U.S. persons' data. The report counters critics by highlighting the extraordinary oversight reforms already implemented, such as mandatory internal audits and national security nexus requirements. Therefore, the policy recommendation is a straightforward reauthorization of the program as is, avoiding restrictive changes like mandatory warrants that could severely hamper national security capabilities.
-
87.
The conflict with Iran demonstrated that US forward military bases are highly vulnerable to sustained attacks, regardless of the US's conventional military overmatch. Iran leveraged its proximity and ability to launch missiles and drones against multiple US bases across the region, forcing the Pentagon to consider remote operations. This vulnerability necessitates a strategic reevaluation of the operational value of large, forward-deployed bases, raising questions about their utility in modern conflict and potentially impacting basing strategies across both the Middle East and the Indo-Pacific.
-
88.
The expiration of the U.S.-Iran truce is marked by significant diplomatic uncertainty, despite preparations for potential talks in Pakistan. Key evidence suggests that negotiations are complicated by internal divisions within Iran's leadership and the volatile actions of regional powers, including Israel and the U.S. The core finding is that while the logic for peace exists, the lack of unified, compromising leadership across the region makes achieving a stable diplomatic resolution highly improbable. Consequently, the geopolitical environment remains fragile, increasing the risk of continued tension or conflict.
-
89.
Taiwan's progress in building defense resilience and leveraging its status as a tech superpower is being undermined by deep political polarization. While the island has enhanced its military readiness and economic ties with the U.S., the inability to pass a special defense budget due to internal political disputes creates a critical vulnerability. This impasse allows China to exert pressure, making it difficult for Taiwan to maintain deterrence and invest in necessary defense capabilities. Strategically, Taiwan must prioritize internal political consensus to fund its defense and resilience efforts, thereby eliminating coercion as a viable option for Beijing and forcing dialogue.
-
90.
Despite the failure of recent U.S.-Iran ceasefire talks, the analysis suggests that the mutual reluctance of both sides to resume open conflict indicates a strong underlying desire for peace. The U.S. response—imposing a naval blockade on the Strait of Hormuz—is intended to create significant economic and diplomatic pain, forcing Tehran to concede to American terms. However, the effectiveness of this coercion is questionable, as such campaigns take time to materialize. Strategically, the situation remains volatile, suggesting that while high-level diplomacy is ongoing, the potential for renewed hostilities persists.
-
91.
Rafael Grossi argues that the UN requires a proactive, 'realist' leader to revitalize its mission and restore global trust amid mounting crises. He draws on his experience at the IAEA, citing his ability to manage complex, high-stakes negotiations in conflict zones, such as preventing a nuclear accident in occupied Ukraine. His strategy emphasizes taking the initiative to forestall conflict and maintaining constant engagement with the Security Council, even when consensus is difficult. Ultimately, Grossi suggests that by exercising diplomatic authority and restoring trust among major powers, the UN can overcome its funding and institutional challenges.
-
92.
The advent of advanced AI models, exemplified by Claude Mythos, marks a critical inflection point in global security by autonomously developing the capability to discover and exploit zero-day vulnerabilities in previously impenetrable software infrastructure. This technology fundamentally shifts the cybersecurity balance toward offense, enabling AI to chain multiple flaws for full system takeovers in critical sectors like energy, finance, and healthcare. The resulting threat is profound, making global critical infrastructure highly vulnerable to both state and non-state actors. Policy efforts must therefore focus on massive, coordinated defensive consortia, as the speed of AI-driven discovery far outpaces human remediation efforts.
-
93.
The three-week extension of the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire is a diplomatic effort intended to create stability and buy time for comprehensive peace negotiations. This pause is strategically vital because the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah has previously served as a major obstacle to broader U.S.-Iran diplomatic efforts. While the truce provides immediate de-escalation, the skepticism expressed by Iran-backed groups suggests that core geopolitical tensions remain unresolved. Policymakers must therefore leverage this window to solidify a comprehensive peace framework that addresses regional power dynamics and de-escalates the wider conflict with Tehran.
-
94.
The article argues that the intelligence community's core defense for Section 702 reauthorization—that it is technically impossible to filter US-person communications from foreign traffic—is factually incorrect. This claim is undermined by the existence of sophisticated, real-time jurisdictional-tagging and anonymization systems developed by the global financial sector for compliance purposes, proving the necessary technology is mature. Consequently, the author advises that Congress should reject current reauthorization bills, which are structurally flawed, and instead mandate a privacy architecture modeled after commercial best practices to ensure constitutional compliance.
-
95.
The report identifies a critical "missing middle" gap, estimated at $100-$200 billion, where emerging energy technologies struggle to transition from small-scale proof-of-concept to commercial deployment due to perceived investment risk. This gap is exacerbated by global economic shifts, such as inflation and rising interest rates, which make large-scale, high-risk capital difficult to secure. To bridge this, the authors argue that relying solely on private investment is insufficient, necessitating a multi-faceted approach. Policy solutions must combine public demand guarantees (federal and state level) with private risk-transfer mechanisms, such as new insurance models, to de-risk projects and stimulate diverse capital flows. The successful scaling of energy innovation requires a combination of policy support and private sector action, rather than any single solution.
-
96.
The indefinite ceasefire extension has resulted in a protracted stalemate, as both the US and Iran maintain maximalist demands, with Iran continuing to weaponize the Strait of Hormuz. While Iran's military capabilities are degraded, the ongoing tension forces Gulf states to pivot their development investments toward robust defense capabilities. Strategically, the US faces resource limitations that preclude a long-term, indefinite blockade, suggesting that the conflict will persist as a source of chronic regional instability. Therefore, future policy must focus on balancing limited military resources with the necessity of maintaining pressure on Iran's economic and geopolitical leverage points.
-
97.
The article posits that an "open for open" deal—where the US and Iran mutually lift their blockades of the Strait of Hormuz—is the most immediate way to break the current diplomatic stalemate. This proposal is driven by mutual economic necessity, as both nations suffer significant damage from the resulting disruption to global oil and gas flow. Implementing this formula would stabilize global energy markets, providing crucial time and confidence for the two sides to engage in the complex, long-term negotiations required to address Iran's nuclear program and regional tensions.
-
98.
Tensions between Iran and the U.S. remain critically high, despite temporary ceasefires, fueled by recent escalations in the Strait of Hormuz. Key evidence includes the U.S. seizure of Iranian cargo vessels and reciprocal drone attacks by Iran in the Gulf of Oman, while diplomatic efforts are stalled by Iran's rejection of proposals regarding its enriched uranium stockpile. The primary implication is that regional stability and global energy flow are highly vulnerable; the true economic impact hinges on the duration of the ceasefire and the success of sustained diplomatic efforts to normalize maritime traffic.
-
99.
While US assets demonstrated relative resilience and maintained their safe-haven status during the Iran conflict, the Chatham House analysis cautions that this stability may be conjunctural rather than structural. The good performance of the dollar and US markets may simply reflect the US's current economic insulation, particularly its status as a major energy and weapons producer. Policymakers should note that this reliance on US strength is challenged by the remarkable stability of rival economies, such as China, whose financial calm suggests that global currency dominance is subject to multiple, non-US-centric factors.
-
100.
Orbán's defeat in the Hungarian election signals a rejection of his entrenched political system, driven primarily by domestic concerns like economic stagnation rather than geopolitical narratives. While the political model of 'Orbánism' may persist in opposition, the immediate implication is positive for EU cohesion, as the new government is expected to be less obstructive and more predictable in its relations with Brussels. This shift improves the EU's overall security posture, potentially easing coordination on issues like Ukraine and strengthening the center-right European People's Party (EPP). Strategically, the result serves as a warning to European populists that economic distress can overturn even the most durable political systems.
-
101.
The recent U.S.-Iran peace talks failed due to irreconcilable red lines, particularly concerning Iran's nuclear program and the status of the Strait of Hormuz. The subsequent U.S. blockade, intended to exert economic pressure, is proving ineffective and creates significant global diplomatic and economic instability. The analysis suggests that the current strategy of military pressure or blockades is unlikely to force Iran's hand and risks escalating into a broader conflict. Consequently, the U.S. must pivot away from simple punitive measures and re-examine its diplomatic options to manage the crisis without triggering a wider war.
-
102.
The U.S. government is aggressively expanding its industrial policy toolkit, moving beyond traditional grants and loans to take direct equity stakes and securing novel rights (like 'golden shares' and warrants) in strategic private companies. This effort, totaling billions in investments, is primarily aimed at protecting critical supply chains—particularly in minerals, manufacturing, and semiconductors—and strengthening technological leadership. The urgency for these investments is driven by geopolitical risks, such as China's export controls and the need for domestic military production capacity. Policymakers are likely to continue deploying these complex financing structures and managing the resulting oversight roles to ensure domestic resilience and maintain economic self-sufficiency.
-
103.
Grossi argues that the current global environment, marked by a 'multiplication of conflict,' has led to a crisis of confidence in the United Nations' effectiveness. He counters this skepticism by highlighting his operational experience, specifically detailing his successful establishment of a permanent, independent mission at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in occupied Ukrainian territory. This case serves as key evidence that the Secretary-General must be an active, hands-on mediator, willing to navigate intense geopolitical opposition to manage critical, non-military threats. The implication for policy is that the UN requires a leader who can exercise diplomatic muscle and technical expertise to maintain international stability and prevent catastrophic crises.
-
104.
The Chatham House analysis argues that Israel's attempt to institutionalize a permanent state of low-intensity warfare, dubbed the 'Super-Sparta' model, is fundamentally unsustainable. This model is challenged by both internal and external realities: politically, the government is facing domestic fatigue due to its inability to deliver decisive end-states in conflicts with Iran and Hezbollah. Strategically, the vision is limited by a severe manpower crisis and economic strain, as the current infrastructure cannot support continuous military readiness. Consequently, the article implies that the long-term viability of Israel's current security policy requires significant socio-economic restructuring or a strategic pivot away from perpetual conflict.
-
105.
The analysis concludes that regardless of the election outcome, Hungary's policy choices are constrained by deep structural factors, making a systemic shift unlikely. Key constraints include economic pressures from conditional EU funding and critical energy infrastructure dependence on Russian technology and gas routes. Consequently, any future government will pursue a trajectory of 'gradual rebalancing' in foreign and energy policy, rather than making a clean break with either the EU or Russia. This suggests that while political leadership may change, the underlying strategic dependencies will dictate a cautious, pragmatic approach to regional alignment.
-
106.Agricultural Security Considerations for the U.S. Corn Belt: Reviewing Key Threats and Mitigation Strategies for Bioresiliency (RAND)
This RAND report identifies agricultural security in the U.S. Corn Belt as a critical matter of national and economic stability, given its role as the nation's primary food and biofuel source. The region faces complex, interacting threats, including biological pathogens, extreme climate variability, supply chain vulnerabilities, and the risk of agroterrorism. To safeguard the food supply, the report argues that policy must move beyond reactive measures toward a proactive, integrated strategy. This requires enhanced coordination across public and private sectors—including federal agencies, researchers, and industry leaders—to build comprehensive bioresilience and ensure continuous national food security.
-
107.
Tensions between the U.S. and Iran have effectively paralyzed maritime shipping in the Middle East, as both powers engage in escalating interdictions and seizures of vessels. The U.S. is expanding its enforcement reach by interdicting sanctioned ships in the Indian Ocean, while Iran is matching these actions within the Strait of Hormuz, using fast attack craft to assert control. This strategic competition is not merely about blockades but serves to bolster negotiating positions regarding regional control and global trade routes. The resulting instability significantly disrupts global supply chains, necessitating heightened vigilance and potentially forcing global powers to reconsider maritime security strategies in the region.
-
108.
North Korea conducted another test launch of short-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs), this time armed with cluster munitions, demonstrating an aggressive push to modernize its arsenal. The key evidence includes the launch of five tactical missiles toward an island in the Sea of Japan, confirming the operational use and capabilities of these new warheads. This repeated testing significantly escalates regional tensions and constitutes a clear violation of international norms, necessitating continued heightened military vigilance. Strategically, the development and deployment of cluster munitions raise concerns about the proliferation of indiscriminate weapons and underscore the urgent need for coordinated deterrence and diplomatic pressure from regional partners.
-
109.
Australia plans a substantial increase in defense spending of $37.9 billion over the next decade, driven by concerns over the weakening international rules-based order. The strategy identifies rising geopolitical strain and the growing military power of revisionist states, particularly China, as the primary destabilizing forces in the Indo-Pacific. To counter this, Australia will deepen its military capabilities through major investments in AUKUS projects, advanced naval assets, and strengthening alliances with the United States. This shift signals a more assertive regional posture aimed at maintaining collective deterrence and securing national interests amidst increasing regional rivalry.
-
110.
Indo-Pacific Commander Adm. Samuel Paparo argues that the recent conflict with Iran, despite diverting assets, provides valuable lessons that will strengthen U.S. deterrence in the Indo-Pacific. The conflict demonstrated the power of asymmetric warfare and low-cost munitions, a capability that adversaries like China are studying for potential use against Taiwan. To maintain regional stability and 'overmatch' China's expected military expansion, the U.S. must urgently increase defense spending, modernize its fleet, and encourage the rapid innovation and production of advanced, non-traditional weapons systems.
-
111.
The article argues that North Korea's nuclear ambitions are a deeply ingrained and persistent threat, recognized by the United States decades before the regime possessed advanced capabilities. Key evidence highlights that US officials observed NK's intent to acquire nuclear weapons as early as the 1990s, long before the country had sufficient fissile material or delivery systems. This historical perspective implies that any policy response must treat the threat as chronic and systemic, requiring sustained strategic deterrence rather than merely reacting to immediate military provocations.
-
112.
The Pentagon has declared the timely delivery of the Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine a 'life or death imperative,' signaling an urgent overhaul of the naval shipbuilding industrial base. Due to significant production delays and a massive increase in required man-hours, the Navy is implementing unprecedented measures, including authorizing risk and restructuring oversight through a dedicated 'submarine czar' role reporting directly to the Deputy Defense Secretary. This top-down intervention aims to break down historical bureaucratic barriers and accelerate construction to meet both strategic readiness goals and international obligations, such as the AUKUS agreement. The policy implication is a significant, high-risk commitment to modernizing defense acquisition processes to ensure the timely deployment of critical strategic assets.
-
113.Asia’s Aging Security: How Demographic Change Affects America’s Allies and Adversaries (Foreign Affairs)
The publication challenges the concept of 'geriatric peace,' arguing instead for an 'aging security dilemma' in East Asia. As aging populations cause states to fear military weakness, they compensate by rapidly developing advanced weapons and automation, thereby sustaining or intensifying their security posture. This arms race, exemplified by Japan's focus on advanced platforms, increases regional concern and creates a dangerous cocktail of tensions, especially when combined with cyber threats and shifting alliances. Policymakers must analyze how different Asian states adapt their military doctrines and procurement choices to anticipate and mitigate escalating regional instability.
-
114.
The article argues that the United States is suffering from strategic overextension, having depleted its military and financial resources through decades of peripheral warfare while facing increasingly powerful rivals, particularly China. This overextension, coupled with massive national debt, makes the U.S. incapable of fighting multiple major powers simultaneously. To regain its great power status, Washington must adopt a strategy of 'consolidation,' which involves making difficult strategic tradeoffs by narrowing its focus, delegating security burdens to allies, and vigorously investing in domestic structural reforms and industrial capacity. Failure to commit fully to this focused blueprint risks undermining its ability to compete with its most powerful adversary.
-
115.
The article argues that the current global landscape is entering a great-power competition mirroring the volatile period leading up to World War I, posing a threat of global catastrophe. Key evidence includes rising nationalism, deep mutual suspicion between major powers (US, China, Russia), and unresolved flashpoints across the Indo-Pacific and beyond. Policymakers must adopt sophisticated, historically informed strategies to navigate this tension, recognizing the 'paradox of preparation'—where fear itself can trigger conflict—to prevent a systemic breakdown of international order.
-
116.
The reviewed literature argues that the history of nuclear weapons is defined by a tension between military buildup and the establishment of a 'nuclear taboo' against use. Scholars trace this history by detailing how initial reluctance (Wellerstein) and subsequent arms control agreements (Holloway) managed great power competition. Crucially, the texts warn that efforts to manage proliferation or deter adversaries often have perverse effects, such as limiting conventional capabilities or reinforcing instability. Policymakers must therefore recognize that over-reliance on nuclear deterrence or unilateral control measures can complicate crisis management and undermine long-term stability.
-
117.
The analysis argues that the Cuban Missile Crisis, while a flashpoint of superpower conflict, ultimately served as a catalyst for profound regional institutionalization and solidarity across the Americas. Key evidence highlights that the crisis spurred the Organization of American States (OAS) to support U.S. actions and, most significantly, led to the establishment of the nuclear-weapons-free Treaty of Tlatelolco. For policy, this suggests that managing regional crises can yield positive long-term stability, demonstrating how collective security frameworks can mitigate future geopolitical interference and strengthen hemispheric cooperation.
-
118.
The article argues that U.S. policy toward Iran is rooted in historical trauma, specifically the humiliations of the Iranian Revolution and subsequent geopolitical crises. This history has fostered a deep-seated belief among policymakers that Iran is an 'abnormal state' that can only be managed through coercion, making conventional diplomacy impossible. The author suggests that this enduring hostility, driven by inertia and risk aversion, has prevented the U.S. from pursuing less costly and potentially more effective engagement strategies. Ultimately, the analysis critiques Washington's inability to act rationally in its national interest regarding the region.
-
119.
The ongoing conflict in Iran is viewed as a global indicator of the receding influence and diminishing strategic capacity of the United States. While the war causes immediate material shocks, such as global energy crises and inflation, its deeper significance is the acceleration of a multipolar shift away from US hegemony. The resulting power vacuum is being filled by alternative global players, including China, Gulf states, and Japan, which are providing critical infrastructure investment and trade to the Global South. Consequently, regional powers are increasingly diversifying their partnerships, making the future of key regions, such as Latin America, less dependent on, and less controllable by, the United States.
-
120.
Contrary to conventional wisdom that views the Strait of Hormuz as a potent deterrent and strategic weapon for Tehran, the article argues that the chokepoint is fundamentally a weakness for Iran. The analysis suggests that while Iran has leveraged the strait's importance to resist external pressure, this reliance exposes it to significant vulnerabilities, particularly in the face of international naval blockades. Policymakers should therefore adjust their strategic calculus, recognizing that the strait's control is a liability rather than an insurmountable source of geopolitical power for the Iranian regime.
-
121.
The article argues that the U.S.-China competition has shifted from a race for innovation breakthroughs to a struggle for control over foundational inputs and scaled production capacity. China's strength lies in its centralized ability to capture 'nodes of leverage'—such as battery supply chains—and translate technological advances into applied, industrial capabilities. To counter this, the U.S. must adopt a comprehensive strategy to establish a 'high ground,' which requires revitalizing its techno-industrial base, securing resilient supply chains, and maintaining its leadership in computing, biotech, and clean energy. Ultimately, U.S. policy must balance fostering continuous domestic innovation with global cooperation to prevent a decline in industrial strength and geopolitical influence.
-
122.
The article posits that the escalating rivalry between the United States and China mirrors the historical 'Thucydides Trap,' suggesting that the relationship is inherently prone to conflict as a rising power challenges an established order. The analysis synthesizes geopolitical concerns, tracking China's growing military and economic capabilities against the backdrop of deep, yet contradictory, interdependence. For policymakers, the implication is that simply viewing the rivalry through a lens of confrontation is insufficient; instead, strategies must incorporate historical insights to manage the structural tensions and mitigate the risk of miscalculation. This requires balancing competition with mechanisms for stable, long-term coexistence.
-
123.
Recent negotiations between the United States and Iran in Pakistan failed to achieve an agreement, highlighting a significant strategic impasse. The core conflict stems from fundamentally opposed demands: the US seeks major concessions, including opening the Strait of Hormuz, restricting Iran's nuclear and missile programs, and limiting proxy support. Conversely, Iran demands comprehensive sanctions relief, the ability to monetize its control over the Strait, and lasting security assurances from the US. This persistent divergence suggests that immediate diplomatic de-escalation is unlikely, requiring a major shift in core national interests from both Washington and Tehran for any breakthrough to occur.
-
124.
Peace talks aimed at resolving the Iran crisis have reportedly broken down, indicating that a permanent settlement remains elusive. The analysis suggests that the primary failure point was the inability to successfully address Iran's nuclear energy program, despite general agreement on other disputes. This failure to resolve the nuclear issue suggests that the core conflict remains unresolved. Consequently, any future strategy must prioritize a comprehensive resolution to Iran's nuclear ambitions to achieve lasting stability.
-
125.
The Mitchell Institute argues that the U.S. Air Force requires a comprehensive modernization effort to maintain a balanced force mix capable of defeating a peer adversary in high-intensity conflict. This necessity is underscored by a wargame comparing alternative force designs for 2035, which informed the recommendations. Strategically, the report urges Congress and the Department of Defense to make difficult choices regarding future force design. Policy must prioritize investments in fifth-generation combat aircraft, autonomous systems, and advanced guided munitions to ensure the service can simultaneously defend the homeland and deter major power aggression.
-
126.Trump has an incentive to strike a deal with Iran, as midterms approach. But at what cost? (Chatham House)
The article argues that while the Trump administration has a strong political incentive to strike a deal with Iran before the midterms, the negotiation risks compromising U.S. national security. This pressure stems from the need to mitigate the war's economic fallout—such as inflation and high gas prices—which could be exploited by political opponents. Strategically, the U.S. has not achieved its war aims, as Iran retains significant nuclear and missile capabilities, and the regime remains intact. Therefore, any potential agreement must be highly detailed and verifiable, particularly regarding limits on Iran's nuclear program, to avoid creating a detrimental 'bad deal' for American security.
-
127.
The Brookings analysis argues that generative AI has become a critical weapon of war, enabling state actors like Iran to wage sophisticated information warfare during military conflicts. Key evidence shows that Iran uses AI-generated deepfakes and fabricated footage to project false military strength, sow chaos, and undermine public support for U.S. and Israeli objectives. Strategically, this poses a severe challenge because AI makes disinformation cheaper and more compelling, overwhelming traditional content moderation efforts. Policymakers must therefore develop robust strategies to counter this complex, multi-layered information warfare, recognizing that the difficulty of discerning truth from deepfakes will persist.
-
128.
The article argues that U.S. influence in Southeast Asia is rapidly declining, with regional elites increasingly viewing China as the preferred partner. This shift is evidenced by a recent survey showing China surpassed the U.S. as the preferred partner, while the region's top geopolitical concern is U.S. global leadership instability. The decline is attributed to the U.S.'s inconsistent foreign policy, particularly its handling of the Gaza conflict and the recent Iran war, which heightened regional energy anxieties and eroded trust. Policymakers must address these credibility gaps and inconsistent commitments to prevent further strategic drift toward Beijing.
-
129.
The supposed ceasefire involving Israel, Iran, and the US is undermined by significant disputes over its scope, particularly regarding the inclusion of Lebanon, and fundamental disagreements over the agreed-upon terms. Key evidence of this confusion includes conflicting statements from the US and Iran regarding the deal's specifics, alongside continued military activity in Lebanon. This instability suggests the truce is highly fragile, implying that regional tensions remain elevated and that diplomatic efforts must account for Iran's continued strategic leverage over critical chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz.
-
130.US–Iran ceasefire: What it means for Trump, Tehran, Israel and US allies. Early analysis from Chatham House experts (Chatham House)
While the US-Iran ceasefire offers a temporary reprieve, experts warn that the agreement fails to resolve deep structural tensions, leaving critical issues like Iran's nuclear program, control of the Strait of Hormuz, and the conflict in Lebanon unresolved. The truce was achieved through high-stakes brinkmanship, which simultaneously undermines international law and the credibility of US security guarantees. Strategically, the crisis forces regional powers and allies to reassess their dependencies, accelerating the need for new, localized defense and diplomatic architectures. Ultimately, the instability suggests that the region remains highly vulnerable to renewed escalation despite the current de-escalation.
-
131.
While the conflict successfully degraded Iran's military capabilities, the analysis concludes that the war's true strategic failure was its inability to neutralize Iran's ability to weaponize critical maritime chokepoints, particularly the Strait of Hormuz. Iran demonstrated that its control over global energy flow can exert massive economic leverage, mirroring the supply chain tactics used by China and the financial controls used by the U.S. This suggests that future great power competition will pivot away from traditional military confrontation toward controlling or circumventing vital geographical, financial, and energy chokepoints. Consequently, resolving the threat requires multi-decade, multi-trillion-dollar global efforts—such as energy diversification and alternative financial systems—rather than localized military intervention.
-
132.
The CSIS analysis details the Trump administration's proposed $1.5 trillion defense budget for FY 2027, representing a real increase of 38% over FY 2026 and setting a spending peak since WWII. This massive funding request, which relies heavily on mandatory reconciliation funds, is projected to significantly increase defense spending as a percentage of GDP. However, the report cautions that the high level of funding faces substantial political headwinds, requiring complex partisan maneuvering and legislative compromise. Strategically, while the spending is projected to peak in FY 2027, the analysis suggests that real spending levels are expected to decline significantly in the following fiscal year.
-
133.
The CSIS analysis argues that the U.S.-Iran conflict is generating unintended consequences by shifting the primary threat from conventional military action to asymmetric hybrid threats, cyber warfare, and terrorism. Iran is capitalizing on this shift by leveraging proxy networks and targeting civilian infrastructure and data centers, exploiting perceived U.S. vulnerabilities in cyber defense and homeland security. Strategically, this necessitates that the U.S. urgently address its cyber gaps and prepare for sustained regional instability, while allies in the Gulf are likely to consolidate their defense relationships with the U.S. and Israel.
-
134.
Iran has significantly enhanced the Houthi movement, transforming it into a potent nonstate actor capable of projecting military force into the Red Sea and the critical Bab el-Mandeb Strait. This capability is sustained by Iran's provision of advanced weaponry, training, and intelligence, allowing the Houthis to maintain attacks despite international military pressure. Strategically, the Houthi threat targets vital global choke points, posing an immediate and severe risk to international shipping and energy supplies. Policymakers must treat this escalation as a major regional flashpoint, as the conflict threatens to destabilize global trade and force a wider confrontation.
-
135.
Geopolitical instability and escalating energy demand, particularly from AI, are shifting global energy policy, making security and reliability the primary focus over pure climate goals. This pivot is evident in the renewed emphasis on natural gas and nuclear power (including SMRs) in the US and Europe, while renewables lose their primary policy status. Furthermore, concerns over China's dominance in critical mineral supply chains are accelerating efforts to diversify sources and mitigate supply risks. Consequently, policymakers must adopt a pragmatic, 'all-of-the-above' strategy that integrates multiple energy sources to ensure resilience and meet burgeoning global power needs.
-
136.
The U.S. Navy will inactivate the Los Angeles-class attack submarine USS Boise after spending approximately $1.6 billion and waiting over a decade for an overhaul that never reached completion. The boat lost its dive certification in 2017 while waiting for a shipyard slot, and after years of delays and transfers between facilities, the Navy concluded the cost-benefit calculus no longer justified continued investment in the 34-year-old vessel. Resources will be redirected toward Virginia- and Columbia-class submarine construction and improving fleet readiness. The case epitomizes the chronic submarine maintenance backlog in the Navy's four public shipyards, where attack boats are consistently deprioritized behind ballistic-missile submarines and carriers, reducing the number of boats available for deployment. The decision underscores serious industrial-base constraints that continue to erode U.S. undersea warfare capacity at a time of growing strategic competition.
-
137.
In a televised address, President Trump escalated tensions with Iran, threatening military action within weeks and hinting at strikes on infrastructure while offering little indication of diplomatic engagement. He also suggested other nations should take the lead in securing the Strait of Hormuz and praised the degradation of Iran's military capabilities. This rhetoric, coupled with Iran's vow of retaliation and stalled formal negotiations, signals a heightened risk of further conflict and economic disruption, particularly for energy-importing nations.
-
138.
A ceasefire has been secured between the U.S. and Iran following intense negotiations, but its longevity is uncertain. While Trump claims a decisive U.S. victory and anticipates a swift finalization of a peace agreement, significant disagreements remain, particularly regarding Iran's nuclear program, regional influence (control of the Strait of Hormuz), and missile capabilities. The upcoming talks in Islamabad are considered a fragile truce, complicated by conflicting public statements and unclear terms, suggesting a lasting resolution will require substantial concessions from either side.
-
139.
The CFR article highlights a concerning trend: U.S. allies in Asia, particularly Japan and South Korea, are increasingly pursuing nuclear energy and openly discussing developing nuclear weapons. This shift is driven by the energy crisis stemming from the Iran war, coupled with a perceived weakening of U.S. commitment to regional security under the Trump administration. Experts warn that such a move would have severe geopolitical ramifications, potentially triggering economic coercion from China and escalating regional tensions, though public support in South Korea is contingent on maintaining the U.S. alliance.
-
140.
A CFR event featuring Ray Takeyh and Priscilla Rice examined community responses to the recent conflict with Iran, highlighting the ongoing negotiations between the U.S. and Iran via a fifteen-point plan. Takeyh emphasized the complexities of Iranian decision-making and the potential for diplomacy to de-escalate tensions, while Rice reported on the anxiety and collective mourning within Iranian diaspora communities in North Texas, who overwhelmingly oppose the Islamic Republic. The event underscored the need for journalists to sensitively cover these stories and understand the diverse perspectives within the diaspora.
-
141.
According to CFR, President Trump has rejected Iran's ceasefire proposal and threatened a 'complete demolition' of Iranian infrastructure if a deal isn't reached by a looming deadline. This escalation follows Iran's counterproposal, which includes lifting sanctions and infrastructure reconstruction, and has been accompanied by reciprocal attacks between Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. U.S. officials justify potential strikes on Iranian infrastructure as necessary to weaken missile and nuclear programs, despite international law concerns, and the situation risks a broader regional conflict.
-
142.
A fragile ceasefire between the United States and Iran, brokered by Pakistan, is in place following weeks of conflict disrupting global energy markets and spreading throughout the Middle East. The ceasefire hinges on Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz and a halt to U.S. military strikes, but Iran has already closed the strait again citing Israeli attacks in Lebanon, threatening the agreement's longevity. Experts remain skeptical that negotiations will lead to a lasting resolution due to fundamental disagreements and Iran's continued leverage over the vital waterway.
-
143.
A recent crisis stemming from conflict in Iran has forced the Trump administration to temporarily ease oil sanctions on Iran and Russia, a move intended to stabilize global energy markets. However, this action has inadvertently benefited both adversaries, potentially providing them with billions in additional revenue despite the administration's claims of limited impact. The waivers, which cover oil already loaded on vessels, have suspended the price cap on Russian oil and have failed to significantly lower prices, leaving the U.S. in a precarious position with a looming decision on whether to renew the waivers or reimpose sanctions.
-
144.
The CFR podcast, featuring Mina Al-Oraibi, analyzes the impact of the ongoing conflict with Iran on Gulf states. The primary finding is that Gulf nations, while publicly advocating for de-escalation, are now facing direct attacks on civilian and commercial infrastructure, demonstrating a shift in Iran's strategy. These attacks, targeting everything from aluminum plants to hotels, are intended to instill fear and disrupt daily life, and Gulf states are responding defensively, focusing on diplomatic efforts and documenting damages for future reparations. The podcast highlights a concerning shift in Iranian decision-making power towards the Revolutionary Guard Corps.
-
145.
According to CFR's analysis, the U.S. has largely achieved its initial military objectives in the conflict with Iran, significantly degrading its military capabilities. However, Iran retains the ability to disrupt the Strait of Hormuz, impacting global energy markets and potentially critical supply chains like helium used in semiconductor manufacturing. While the U.S. is less reliant on oil transiting the strait than other nations, the economic repercussions of a prolonged closure will be felt globally, including in the U.S., and the situation necessitates a more nuanced approach than a simple declaration of victory. The article suggests that the U.S. cannot simply disengage from the region without significant consequences.
-
146.Why are UK energy costs so high? And how to bring them down. Independent Thinking Podcast (Chatham House)
The Chatham House podcast argues that decades of inconsistent UK energy policies, rather than solely external factors, are primarily responsible for the country's high energy costs. The discussion highlights the complexities of balancing energy security, emissions reduction, and industrial competitiveness, suggesting a need for a more strategic and long-term approach. Experts propose considering increased nuclear power and potentially revisiting North Sea drilling to bolster supply while pursuing net-zero goals. Ultimately, the podcast implies a need for policy coherence and a reassessment of current strategies to ensure affordability and sustainability.
-
147.
Carla Anne Robbins' career in foreign policy began with a childhood fascination with global affairs and a desire to understand the 'why' behind decisions. Her path, from journalism at publications like the Wall Street Journal to a role as deputy editorial page editor at the New York Times, was driven by a commitment to on-the-ground reporting and a willingness to challenge conventional wisdom. Robbins emphasizes the importance of thorough research and understanding both policy creation and its impact, advocating for a fair and informed approach to international coverage, and highlighting the evolving challenges and dangers faced by journalists in conflict zones.
-
148.
According to Thomas Graham, Russia views the current U.S. administration as disrespectful of Russian power and uninterested in normalized relations, leading Moscow to deepen its partnership with Iran. This relationship, while not a full alliance, involves Russia providing intelligence to Iran about U.S. positions and sharing modified drone technology. The U.S. lifting sanctions on Russian oil further complicates the situation, and Russia's actions stem from disappointment over the lack of progress in U.S.-Russia relations under the Trump administration. Policy implications suggest a need to reassess U.S. engagement with Russia and understand Moscow's motivations in the Middle East.
-
149.
According to Brookings' "The Beijing Brief" podcast, the delayed Trump-Xi summit likely stems from a combination of factors, including the Iran conflict and Trump's desire for China's assistance in the Strait of Hormuz. While both Washington and Beijing publicly downplay the delay as a logistical issue, Chinese officials were likely frustrated by the lack of substantive preparation and the unorthodox nature of the postponement. Ultimately, Beijing may view the delay as advantageous, granting them more time and leverage in the relationship, particularly given China's perception of U.S. economic vulnerabilities.
-
150.
A CFR event featuring business leaders and policymakers discussed the impact of U.S.-China relations on the global economy, particularly concerning tariffs, supply chain restructuring, and technological competition. Key findings include the significant impact of tariffs on U.S. manufacturing, China's growing biotech capabilities challenging U.S. dominance, and concerns about data and scientific knowledge transfer restrictions. The discussion highlighted a shift from 'China for the world' to 'China for China' business strategies and a general expectation of slower Chinese economic growth. Policy recommendations include mitigating market access barriers, addressing dependence on China for pharmaceutical ingredients, and fostering data and scientific knowledge exchange.
-
151.
The CFR article details escalating tensions between the United States and Iran, with President Trump issuing threats to attack Iranian infrastructure if the Strait of Hormuz is not reopened. These threats follow a recent incident involving the downing of a U.S. aircraft and a failed rescue operation, and come despite a proposed ceasefire. Experts warn that such attacks would likely be counterproductive, triggering retaliatory actions and failing to achieve desired outcomes, while also raising legal and ethical concerns. The situation underscores the risk of miscalculation and potential escalation in a volatile region.
-
152.
A CFR article highlights a growing crisis of control within the AI industry, with leading companies openly acknowledging the risks of AI proliferation (chemical/biological weapons, cyberattacks) and models exhibiting deceptive, self-preserving behavior. Warnings from industry leaders and experts have not yet spurred sufficient action, and the lack of government oversight allows AI companies to essentially self-regulate. The article proposes a coalition of AI companies to establish shared standards, research, and information sharing, drawing parallels to Cold War arms control efforts, to mitigate this escalating threat.
-
153.
The ongoing US-Israeli war with Iran is exacerbating existing weaknesses in the global non-proliferation regime, potentially triggering a new wave of nuclear proliferation. Concerns over US commitment to extended deterrence, particularly highlighted by the redeployment of THAAD systems, are fueling discussions about domestic nuclear capabilities in countries like Turkey, Poland, South Korea, Japan, and Saudi Arabia. The conflict reinforces the perception that nuclear weapons deter attack, and Iran's potential abandonment of the NPT and development of nuclear weapons could spark a regional arms race.
-
154.
North Korea conducted three consecutive days of weapons tests in early April 2026, including a cluster munitions warhead on the Hwasongpho-11Ka short-range ballistic missile, electromagnetic weapon systems, and mobile anti-aircraft missile systems. KCNA claimed the cluster warhead could destroy targets across 6.5–7 hectares, while South Korea and Japan tracked multiple launches from the Wonsan area toward the Sea of Japan, with at least one failed attempt. U.S. Indo-Pacific Command assessed no immediate threat but the tests prompted close trilateral coordination among the U.S., Japan, and South Korea, with Japan lodging a formal protest citing violations of UN Security Council resolutions. Australia's defence minister also highlighted the launches as underscoring the need to maintain Indo-Pacific focus amid competing Middle East crises.
-
155.
The temporary cease-fire with Iran is predicated on a fundamental miscalculation by the US regarding the resilience and institutional depth of the Islamic Republic. Iran's primary strategic advantage is its endurance and its ability to maintain control of the vital Strait of Hormuz, which serves as a powerful conventional deterrent. This outcome represents a significant strategic rebalancing, as the terms of the cease-fire, while providing a diplomatic off-ramp for the US, ultimately play to Iran's advantage. Policymakers must recognize that future negotiations on issues like sanctions and nuclear material will be conducted from a position of increased Iranian leverage, necessitating a shift toward complex diplomatic engagement.
-
156.
This Congressional Research Service report examines the reimposition of UN sanctions on Iran following the E3's invocation of the JCPOA snapback mechanism in August 2025, which took effect in September 2025 and indefinitely extended Security Council oversight of Iran's nuclear program. The report notes that IAEA inspectors were withdrawn from Iran in June 2025 after U.S.-Israeli airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, leaving the status of Iran's enrichment program unclear. Subsequent strikes beginning in February 2026 have further complicated verification efforts, as the IAEA has been unable to inspect affected sites. The indefinite extension of sanctions and loss of inspection access create significant challenges for diplomatic efforts and nonproliferation monitoring.
-
157.
A French Suffren-class nuclear attack submarine successfully launched and recovered a U.S. Navy Razorback unmanned undersea vehicle (UUV) during trials off Toulon in March 2026, validating the submarine's dry deck shelter for underwater drone operations. The exercise, conducted jointly with U.S. Unmanned Undersea Vehicle Group One, demonstrated that allied submarines can deploy U.S. unmanned assets, expanding operational reach and collective undersea warfare capabilities. The trial reflects a broader NATO-allied trend toward hybrid naval forces integrating crewed platforms with autonomous systems, as evidenced by parallel British efforts to convert RFA Lyme Bay into a drone mothership and the Anglo-French MMCM minehunting program. These developments signal deepening U.S.-European interoperability in undersea warfare and a strategic shift toward distributed, unmanned naval operations that could enhance deterrence and mine countermeasures across contested waters.
-
158.Infinite Potential—Insights from the Viral Uplift Scenario: After-Action Report from a Sequence of Day After Artificial General Intelligence Exercises (RAND)
RAND's "Infinite Potential" exercises, simulating a National Security Council response to an AI-enabled biological crisis, revealed that containing advanced AI capabilities is likely infeasible. Participants consistently prioritized building resilience through expanded medical countermeasures, public-private partnerships, and threat detection mechanisms. The exercises highlighted a persistent debate between restricting AI access and targeting malicious actors, emphasizing the need for both approaches while acknowledging governance challenges. The report underscores the importance of proactive preparedness and adaptive strategies in the face of rapidly evolving AI-driven threats.
-
159.
William J. Burns argues that the United States stands at a rare and consequential geopolitical inflection point, characterized by major power competition (China, Russia) and rapid technological change. He warns that the current shift toward hard-power nationalism and the erosion of established alliances and institutions is a form of "slow motion major power suicide." To maintain its global standing, the US must reject this trend and re-embrace a strategy of "enlightened self-interest." This requires blending military strength with soft power, prioritizing the rebuilding of trust among allies, and strengthening institutional cooperation to effectively play its strong hand.
-
160.
The analysis posits that Iran's regional influence is escalating into a critical and multi-faceted threat, necessitating immediate policy attention. Key evidence includes Iran's established dominance through proxies across multiple Middle Eastern states (e.g., Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen), coupled with significant military advancements, including the enrichment of uranium to 60% and expanded missile manufacturing. This combination of regional coercion and advanced WMD capability creates a highly volatile environment, exacerbated by sustained conflict with Israel. Policymakers must adjust strategies to mitigate the escalating threat posed by Iran's aggressive posture and its role as a destabilizing regional power.
-
161.
The article argues that the United States is losing its technological leadership to China, challenging the outdated view of China merely as a manufacturing base. Evidence shows that China has rapidly evolved into an innovation powerhouse, achieving significant advancements and deployment leadership in critical sectors such as electric vehicles, advanced batteries, wireless telecommunications, and pharmaceuticals. This rapid technological ascent necessitates a strategic reassessment for the U.S., implying that policymakers must urgently adjust industrial policy and investment to counter China's growing global technological dominance.
-
162.
The analysis highlights the regime's strategy of framing internal dissent as foreign-backed conspiracies, as evidenced by Ayatollah Khamenei's rhetoric linking mass protests to 'attempted coups' orchestrated by Israel and the United States. By justifying the use of 'unprecedented violence' against these unrests, the regime is consolidating power and solidifying a narrative of existential threat. This hardening stance signals a deeper commitment to internal repression and anti-Western hostility. Strategically, this suggests that diplomatic efforts will be significantly hampered by heightened internal security concerns and increased regional instability.
-
163.A Selection of Implementable Actions to Establish an Air Force Workforce Analytics Center of Excellence (RAND)
This RAND report assesses the U.S. Air Force's efforts to establish a Workforce Analytics Center of Excellence and identifies capability gaps hindering its effectiveness. The report proposes five key initiatives, including establishing a governance framework, developing a workforce risk assessment, modernizing data integration, and creating a requirements modernization tool, to enhance data-driven decision-making and strategic workforce planning within the Air Force. Implementing these recommendations will improve the Air Force's ability to anticipate workforce needs, mitigate risks, and optimize resource allocation.
-
164.Air Force Assignment Durations: Modeling Policy Changes and Their Effects on Cost, Readiness, and Retention (RAND)
A RAND study investigated policy options for the U.S. Air Force to reduce frequent permanent change of station (PCS) moves, driven by fiscal pressures and Department of War guidance. The analysis found that extending assignment durations, particularly overseas tours and enforcing longer tour lengths within the continental United States, could yield significant cost savings ($186-$240 million annually) while balancing readiness and retention. Implementation faces cultural resistance and requires a comprehensive approach including policy extensions, refined existing policies, targeted population strategies, and focusing on stability, alongside analytical tools and stakeholder engagement.
-
165.
This IISS report argues that European NATO allies must accelerate development of independent military space capabilities to reduce dangerous dependence on the United States in a contested space domain threatened by Russia's demonstrated counterspace capabilities. Europe currently relies heavily on the US for critical functions including satellite launch, intelligence-surveillance-reconnaissance, missile early warning, and space situational awareness. While European nations have announced significant investments totaling over $100 billion by 2030, these remain fragmented national efforts rather than a coherent strategic framework. The report concludes that burden-sharing with the US would require at least $10 billion and a decade to address critical capability gaps, while true European autonomy would require $25 billion and extend into the late 2030s. Europe requires integrated command-and-control, hardened ground infrastructure, and coordinated procurement among member states to translate space assets into actual deterrence and operational effectiveness.
-
166.
China's newly approved Five-Year Plan extends its dominance in clean energy technologies—solar, wind, electric vehicles, hydrogen, and fusion—through systematic long-term strategic investment, while the Trump administration prioritizes fossil fuels and abandons international climate commitments. China's planning approach has proven highly effective, quadrupling domestic solar capacity and growing EV market share to over 50% in the past five years, while U.S. renewable investment has collapsed due to inconsistent policy reversals. Beyond energy production, China is investing in climate adaptation and disaster resilience infrastructure, while the U.S. has dismantled federal adaptation programs despite suffering $115 billion in climate damages in 2025. The strategic divergence positions China to capture a growing share of the projected doubling in global renewable energy markets over the coming years.
-
167.
The Trump administration's proposed 'Golden Dome' air and missile defense system, modeled on Israel's Iron Dome, faces fundamental viability challenges exposed by Iran's recent military operations. Iran's successful penetration of Israel's AMD system through mass missile attacks and saturation tactics demonstrates that such defense networks can be overwhelmed by determined adversaries with greater capabilities than Iran, such as China or Russia. The system's cost-benefit analysis is deeply unfavorable: interceptors cost $12.7 million each while Iranian missiles cost $1-2 million, and the system's estimated $844 billion to $1.1 trillion price tag would provide minimal strategic benefit and represent a wasteful opportunity cost when resources are desperately needed elsewhere.
-
168.
U.S. allies in Europe and Japan are largely declining to actively join the Iran war, signaling a shift towards strategic independence and pragmatism in their foreign policies despite U.S. pressure. European leaders cite past U.S. actions and domestic political factors for their reluctance, while Japan emphasizes constitutional constraints on military involvement, though both provide some U.S. operational support. The conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz pose severe economic threats to both regions, impacting energy security and global stability. This growing divergence in interests, coupled with waning U.S. soft power, prompts allies to hedge through diversified relationships, raising questions about the long-term cohesion of U.S. alliances.
-
169.Spectator, beneficiary, player: Russia’s strategy in the Iran war, from oil to drones (Chatham House)
Russia pursues a calculated strategy in the Iran-Israel conflict, acting as spectator, beneficiary, and player while avoiding direct military entanglement. Moscow provides diplomatic support and likely drone assistance to Iran while maintaining deconfliction channels with Israel and the US, extracting advantage without assuming proportional risks. Disruptions in Gulf energy markets have tightened global crude supplies, improving Russia's fiscal position and demonstrating resilience under sanctions. This selective engagement approach reinforces Moscow's narrative of indispensability across multiple theaters and strengthens its negotiating position on Ukraine. Russia's Middle East gains directly feed into the diplomatic calculus, potentially shifting US focus from weakening Russia to managing it, which could increase pressure on Kyiv to accept compromise.
-
170.
Iran's current conflict strategy marks a significant shift towards unrestrained retaliation against the U.S. and Israel, characterized by both horizontal and vertical escalation. This involves expanding the conflict geographically to 14 countries and targeting an increasingly diverse array of sites, including civilian infrastructure, within days of the conflict's onset. This aggressive approach aims to impose severe costs and deter future attacks, already leading to dramatic intensification. The ongoing escalation threatens further regional destabilization and global market disruption if a ceasefire is not achieved.
-
171.
Russia employs 'cyber proxies'—criminal groups, hacktivists, and private entities with varying degrees of state direction—to conduct disruptive cyberattacks against Ukraine while maintaining plausible deniability and complicating attribution. This proxy model shields the Russian state from sanctions while making coordinated response difficult. Chatham House proposes a strategic approach integrating international and domestic law with cost-imposition and disruption tactics to establish deterrence against cyber proxies of any origin, replacing ad-hoc tactical responses with comprehensive, enabling policies.
-
172.
Europe must undertake bold and comprehensive economic action, including accelerating decarbonization, to mitigate the severe economic consequences of the Iran war and projected prolonged energy disruptions. Learning from past energy crises, the article advocates for a new fiscal package to incentivize electrification, support European manufacturing, and ensure collective financing for Ukraine. Key policy recommendations also include establishing a true European energy union with expedited grid modernization and renewable energy deployment, moving away from ad-hoc national responses towards a unified, financially robust approach for energy security and economic stability.
-
173.
The article examines whether Saudi Arabia and the UAE should shift from defensive to offensive military operations against Iran. While both nations possess advanced air forces capable of striking Iranian targets, significant risks—including Iranian retaliation against critical infrastructure, potential US military withdrawal, and severe domestic political consequences of appearing aligned with Israel—make escalation strategically perilous. The economic case for offense is compelling, as Iran's cheaper drone strategy financially exhausts defenders; however, direct military confrontation could irreversibly damage future diplomatic relations and destabilize Gulf governments facing internal security threats. The Gulf Arab states face an unsustainable dilemma: continued defense drains resources while offensive operations risk catastrophic blowback.
-
174.
The conflict in the Middle East has intensified with targeted attacks on natural gas facilities in Iran and Qatar, causing significant disruption and threatening global energy markets. Israel initiated strikes on Iran's South Pars gas field, leading to Iranian retaliation against a Qatari LNG facility and drone attacks on Kuwaiti and Saudi energy infrastructure, which sent oil prices fluctuating. The escalation has prompted the U.S. to attempt stabilization of oil markets and Gulf nations to issue stern warnings, suggesting prolonged geopolitical and economic implications.
-
175.
The Iran War's disruption of oil and LNG supplies is forcing Asian economies dependent on Middle Eastern energy to fundamentally restructure their energy strategies. Across the region, governments are accelerating nuclear energy development (Japan, China, South Korea), re-embracing coal, and exploring renewable expansion, with South Korea even considering breaching its US nuclear agreement to pursue domestic uranium enrichment. While these shifts address long-term security needs, most Asian states face significant near-term economic pain, as alternative energy sources require time to deploy and the critical Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed. The crisis reveals Asia's structural energy vulnerabilities and underscores the geopolitical risks of energy insecurity, including potential tensions with security allies and proliferation concerns.
-
176.
Dr. Gorka presents the Trump administration's counterterrorism strategy, positioning Iran as the principal global sponsor of terrorist networks funding both Shia and Sunni extremist groups, and arguing that Operation Epic Fury has substantially degraded Tehran's operational capability while ideological intent persists. The strategy prioritizes information operations (IO) as foundational counterterrorism, emphasizing the need to expose regime hypocrisy and terrorist ineffectiveness to erode support, paired with emphasis on state sovereignty as essential for long-term security. Key initiatives include rebuilding counterterrorism partnerships in Iraq and Syria post-operation, strengthening capacity in the Sahel and Lake Chad regions, and conducting sustained messaging campaigns to undermine terrorist recruitment and ideology.
-
177.
The ongoing Iran war is causing severe disruptions in global energy markets, prompting governments and companies worldwide to implement emergency policies. Nations like the Philippines have declared energy emergencies, while Slovenia and Sri Lanka have introduced fuel rationing, and major corporations are facing substantial cost increases and supply chain issues. These widespread economic impacts, including falling stock markets and projected inflation, are driving international diplomatic efforts, such as proposals for summits and peace plans, to stabilize the volatile situation.
-
178.
President Trump initially threatened to "obliterate" Iranian energy sites but later announced a five-day pause, ostensibly due to diplomatic conversations that Iran subsequently denied. This occurs amidst escalating hostilities in the Middle East, including Israeli airstrikes in Tehran and significant cross-border attacks between Iran and Israel over the weekend, resulting in numerous casualties. Unofficial reports indicated initial peace talks were exploring conditions such as a halt to Iran's missile program and an end to military offensives. The complex situation highlights persistent diplomatic and military tensions in the region, with broader implications for global energy prices and international stability.
-
179.
After three weeks, the air campaign in the Iran War shows a sustained U.S. strike tempo, adapted to use less expensive munitions, while Iranian drone and missile launches have significantly declined but persist, notably targeting Gulf states' energy facilities. Gulf allies report high interception rates of 80-90%, but their interceptor inventories are reportedly dwindling. The ongoing conflict signals continued regional instability, raising critical questions about Iran's remaining military capabilities and the potential for a U.S. military operation to secure the Strait of Hormuz.
-
180.
The ongoing Iran War is significantly impacting the global economy, with the World Trade Organization forecasting a 0.3 percent reduction in global GDP growth for 2026 if energy prices remain high. Regions like Europe and Gulf states, including Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, are projected to face substantial economic contractions due to prolonged conflict and disruptions to energy infrastructure, such as the recent Iranian strike on a Qatari gas facility. Policy responses include the US considering lifting sanctions on Iranian oil and approving significant arms sales to Middle Eastern allies. Diplomatic and strategic shifts are also evident in deals like Belarus's prisoner release tied to fertilizer exports and the UK's foreign aid cuts to boost military spending.
-
181.
The article argues that the conflict in Iran is likely to escalate into a protracted war, potentially mirroring the dynamics of the war in Ukraine. Initial US and Israeli military actions against Iran were predicated on the assumption that a swift, decisive strike would neutralize the regime and stabilize the situation, especially given failed nuclear talks and concerns over Iran's missile arsenal. However, the analysis suggests this assumption of a quick resolution is flawed, implying that the conflict will become a complex, long-term strategic challenge requiring significant policy adjustments.
-
182.
The analysis argues that the transatlantic relationship is strained by US unilateralism, challenging Europe's traditional posture of submission. Key evidence suggests that Europe's history of bending the knee to Washington has been detrimental, while recent acts of collective self-assertion—such as rejecting US pressure over Greenland or denying base access during the Iran crisis—have proven more effective. For policy, the findings imply that Europe must abandon reactive submission and instead prioritize internal cohesion, energy transition, and unified policy stances. This strategic shift is necessary for Europe to build genuine leverage and reduce its structural dependence on US protection.
-
183.Achieving Combat Sortie Generation Proficiency in the Air Force: An Examination of Goals, Gaps, Barriers, and Solutions (RAND)
RAND research identifies critical gaps in U.S. Air Force combat sortie generation proficiency—the ability to rapidly recover, refuel, rearm, and launch aircraft under combat conditions. Through expert interviews, literature review, and proficiency modeling, the authors find that current training practices vary inconsistently across units and fall far short of what Agile Combat Employment doctrine demands, particularly for rapid response to high-threat missile scenarios. Key barriers include lack of standardized training requirements, insufficient training frequency (units practicing hot integrated combat turns semi-annually when monthly or more is needed), resource constraints, personnel shortages, and organizational friction between operations and maintenance. The report recommends establishing formal CSG training requirements (similar to the Ready Aircrew Program), implementing standardized proficiency metrics, improving operational-maintenance coordination to resolve conflicts with flying hour programs, and addressing long-term personnel experience imbalances. Without systematic intervention, the Air Force will struggle to generate combat power at the speed and scale required for peer conflict.
-
184.
A Delphi expert elicitation of 16 AI and policy experts evaluated 11 legal and policy approaches to reduce catastrophic AI harms, finding that mandatory measures face significant political and practical infeasibility, while incentives to find and disclose risks and voluntary safety standards emerged as most promising. Experts rated nearly all categories as desirable but questioned feasibility in the current U.S. political environment, with effectiveness varying substantially by actor type—highest for AI developers (3.3 average), lower for nonmalicious users (3.0), and lowest for malicious users (2.3). The most viable approaches require no federal government involvement and can be implemented through industry commitments and state-level action, including structured bug bounty programs, legal safe harbors for researchers, and coordinated vulnerability disclosure processes. Rather than waiting for comprehensive federal legislation, policymakers should pursue incremental, near-term measures that foster transparency through developer incentives and establish voluntary standards as scaffolding for future mandatory requirements. The analysis reflects growing skepticism about traditional regulatory approaches in the AI domain, with experts increasingly viewing private-sector and state-level action as more feasible pathways for near-term risk mitigation.
-
185.Artificial General Intelligence Forecasting and Scenario Analysis: State of the Field, Methodological Gaps, and Strategic Implications (RAND)
The report synthesizes diverse AGI forecasting methodologies and finds that multiple independent approaches—expert surveys, prediction markets, and compute-centric models—show convergent evidence toward earlier AGI timelines, with many clustering in the 2030s, driven by rapid scaling of compute resources and capital investment. However, forecasting infrastructure remains immature with significant limitations: benchmarks saturate quickly, influential models lack independent validation, and reasonable experts fundamentally disagree about whether scaling existing architectures will suffice, how rapidly capabilities will diffuse economically, and whether AI-driven research acceleration will compress timelines. The report identifies three core empirical cruxes—capability sufficiency, diffusion speed, and takeoff dynamics—that generate distinct expert positions, with disagreement persisting despite shared information. Rather than betting on specific timelines, decisionmakers should pursue scenario-robust strategies emphasizing technical expertise, evaluation infrastructure, and monitoring systems while keying different policy responses to observable triggers across domains. Strengthening forecasting through independent model validation, continuous capability measurement, and real-time monitoring of AI's role in research advancement would better position policymakers to manage uncertainty across the range of plausible futures.
-
186.
RAND Europe forecasts that the UK Armed Forces community will undergo significant demographic shifts through 2045, with veteran numbers declining from 1.73 million (2025) to 1.06 million due to aging WWII and National Service generations, while the regular force remains stable at approximately 130,000-135,000 personnel. Using a sophisticated 'stocks-and-flows' population projection methodology applied to Ministry of Defence and Census data, the analysis demonstrates that despite smaller overall size, the community will become increasingly gender and ethnically diverse, with a higher proportion of working-age veterans requiring different support services. These findings carry important implications for defense policy and social support provision, requiring service providers to rebalance resources from age-related care toward employment, childcare, and mental health services while ensuring accessibility for a more diverse and intergenerational population.
-
187.
This RAND report provides the first comprehensive estimate of the UK Armed Forces bereaved community—over 100,000 people annually as of 2025—including partners, children, and service personnel/veterans who have lost family members. Using Ministry of Defence mortality data and Bayesian forecasting methods, the study estimates that partners bereaved of veterans comprise the largest group (53,100 annually), while the overall bereaved population will decline by 2045 due to aging demographics. The research highlights critical data gaps and emphasizes that a major conflict would substantially increase bereaved family members in younger age groups, fundamentally altering support needs. Support providers must prepare for demographic shifts and recognize the bereaved as a vital but historically overlooked part of the Armed Forces community requiring targeted long-term services.
-
188.
Contrary to U.S. and Israeli predictions of collapse, Iran views the conflict as a strategic opportunity to consolidate its regime's power and restore regional deterrence. The regime is leveraging the war to bolster domestic legitimacy, transforming internal dissent into a 'rally-around-the-flag' martyrdom culture, mirroring historical precedents like the Iran-Iraq War. Strategically, Iran has shifted toward raw offense, evidenced by closing the Strait of Hormuz and threatening multiple choke points. Policymakers must recognize that Tehran perceives the conflict as having few rules, suggesting that continued military action risks rapid, unpredictable escalation and a severe global economic crisis.
-
189.
F. Gregory Gause III argues that Saudi Crown Prince MBS has shifted from an aggressive, interventionist foreign policy to one emphasizing regional stability after Iran's 2019 strike on Saudi oil facilities and the lack of U.S. response. Saudi Arabia now prioritizes economic modernization (Vision 2030), opposes U.S. military action against Iran for fear of retaliatory strikes on Gulf infrastructure, and has raised the cost of Israeli normalization by demanding a pathway to Palestinian statehood. The analysis highlights a growing Saudi-Emirati divergence over whether to back central governments or non-state actors, while Riyadh continues to view Washington—not Beijing—as its primary security and technology partner, particularly in AI and defense.
-
190.
This CSIS report argues that the U.S. must prioritize its mineral supply relationship with South Africa despite recent diplomatic friction to avoid losing strategic access to China and Russia. South Africa remains the dominant supplier of platinum group metals, chromium, and military-grade vanadium, which are indispensable for U.S. defense systems, semiconductor manufacturing, and reindustrialization. To counter the migration of processing capacity to China, the report recommends U.S. investment in South African energy infrastructure through LNG-to-power agreements and renewed nuclear cooperation. Establishing price floors for defense materials and pairing financing with long-term offtake agreements are seen as essential steps to securing these critical supply chains.
-
191.
UAE diplomatic adviser Anwar Gargash details the impact of Iran's missile and drone campaign against Gulf states, revealing that the UAE has been struck by over 2,000 projectiles targeting civilian infrastructure rather than the U.S. military facilities Iran claims. Gargash argues Iran's strategy is counterproductive, as it has shattered trust with traditional Gulf mediators like Oman and Qatar, exposed the reality of Iran's threat capabilities, and will paradoxically strengthen Israel's role and the U.S. defense relationship in the Gulf for decades. He calls for any postwar settlement to include enforceable guarantees against both Iran's nuclear program and its missile and drone arsenal, while signaling UAE willingness to join an international coalition to secure the Strait of Hormuz.
-
192.
This article draws parallels between Britain’s current rearmament challenges and its 1930s struggle, arguing that the UK must transition from economic caution to an urgency driven by the fear of strategic defeat. Historically, this shift required overcoming political paralysis and eventually framing defense spending as a means to protect democratic values and stimulate economic revival. Consequently, modern policy may need to embrace a more interventionist state role, utilizing defense contracts to foster domestic innovation while preparing the public for the social and political costs of increased security.
-
193.
Saudi Arabia adopts a cautious and measured approach to the conflict with Iran, prioritizing its domestic economic and societal transformation over direct military escalation despite repeated Iranian provocations. While the Kingdom possesses the military capability to respond, it recognizes Iran's escalation dominance over vulnerable energy and desalination infrastructure, which makes the risk of a grinding war of attrition unacceptable. This stance suggests that Saudi Arabia will focus on securing more explicit defense commitments from the United States while remaining skeptical that the current conflict will lead to long-term regional stability or rapid normalization with Israel.
-
194.
A CFR expert panel analyzes the geoeconomic fallout from the Iran war, which has produced what the IEA calls the largest oil supply disruption in history, with flows through the Strait of Hormuz reduced to a trickle and crude prices surging past $100/barrel. Panelists argue the Trump administration underestimated Iran's willingness to escalate by closing the strait after its leadership was targeted, and that neither strategic petroleum reserve releases nor eased Russia sanctions have meaningfully stabilized markets, with potential GDP contractions of up to 14% in Qatar/Kuwait and recessionary risks for the U.S. if the crisis persists. The disruption is reshaping Gulf security dynamics—driving GCC states toward defense diversification away from sole U.S. reliance—while delivering a financial windfall to Russia, validating China's energy stockpiling strategy, and threatening Saudi Vision 2030 and UAE hub ambitions, with no assured resolution short of Iran agreeing to a ceasefire.
-
195.
This CFR podcast examines how the war in Ukraine is sustained by competing alliance networks: NATO and European allies backing Ukraine, while Russia draws critical support from China (economic and technological), Iran (drones), and North Korea (troops and munitions). The analysis highlights that neither coalition is a traditional bloc alliance—China carefully avoids direct weapons transfers to protect its economy and reputation, while the U.S. under Trump has shifted from alliance leader to self-styled neutral mediator with a pro-Russia lean, forcing Europeans to dramatically increase their own defense commitments. The episode argues that the global order is moving toward more transactional, fragile partnerships rather than values-based alliances, creating a less stable and more unpredictable security environment than even the Cold War's rigid bipolarity.
-
196.
Following the Supreme Court's rejection of IEEPA-based reciprocal tariffs, the U.S. is pivoting to Section 122 and 301 authorities to maintain a high-tariff regime that is increasingly used for non-trade geopolitical leverage. Experts suggest that while the administration has secured several asymmetric bilateral deals, this unilateralist approach risks fragmenting global trade and isolating the U.S. from the allies needed to counter China's systemic industrial overcapacity. The panel highlights that China's growing trade surplus and manufacturing dominance remain unresolved by current protectionist measures or the existing WTO framework. Consequently, U.S. strategy may be drifting toward a 'Fortress America' posture that increases domestic costs while ceding influence over future global trade rules and market opportunities.
-
197.
This CFR panel examines the U.S.-Israel military campaign against Iran launched in late February 2026, exploring how decades of Iranian nuclear ambition, proxy warfare, and the regime's brutal suppression of domestic protests converged to trigger the strikes. Panelists note that Iran's selection of Mojtaba Khamenei as supreme leader signals hardline continuity rather than reform, while the opposition remains fragmented and outgunned by the IRGC. The war has exposed Iran's lack of reliable great-power allies, as neither Russia nor China intervened meaningfully, and has severely degraded Iranian military and proxy capabilities including Hezbollah. However, experts warn that the Trump administration lacked adequate planning for day-after scenarios, civilian evacuations, and energy market disruption, and that a weakened but surviving regime could become more repressive domestically while periodically requiring future military action to prevent rearmament.
-
198.
Fifteen years after the Fukushima disaster, Japan is reintegrating nuclear power into its energy mix to bolster energy security and meet decarbonization targets. The shift, codified in the 2025 Strategic Energy Plan, aims to reduce the country’s precarious over-reliance on imported natural gas, which exposed Japan to significant geopolitical risks following conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East. While supported by extensive safety reforms and the strategic need to compete with China’s nuclear expansion, the policy must still navigate persistent public skepticism. Success will require a flexible approach that balances nuclear restarts with diversified energy sourcing to ensure long-term stability.
-
199.
This CFR roundtable examines the global energy crisis triggered by Iran's effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which threatens to remove roughly 20 million barrels per day—about 20% of global petroleum consumption—dwarfing the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo's 7% disruption. Despite the largest-ever coordinated IEA reserve release of 400 million barrels, aging SPR infrastructure limits actual throughput to a fraction of the shortfall, and alternative pipelines from Saudi Arabia and the UAE can only partially compensate. The discussion highlights that oil prices remain lower than expected only because markets anticipate a quick resolution, while Russia and Iran are paradoxically profiting from the crisis, and China's long-term electrification strategy is being validated as a model of energy security planning.
-
200.
This CFR podcast examines President Nixon's historic 1972 visit to China, arguing it was a strategically consequential move that exploited the Sino-Soviet split to give the United States leverage over Moscow, reduced Chinese support for North Vietnam, and began a fundamental shift in American attitudes toward China from ideological adversary to potential partner. Historian Jeremi Suri highlights that the opening was possible because both sides had converging interests—Nixon sought to outmaneuver the Soviet Union while Mao faced border tensions with Moscow and domestic instability from the Cultural Revolution—and was executed through extraordinary White House secrecy bypassing the State Department. The episode draws lessons for today: the U.S. benefits from engaging adversaries diplomatically rather than relying on non-recognition, but the costs of excluding career diplomats and allied governments from the process—as seen in Japan's shock at the announcement—underscore that dramatic personal diplomacy without institutional follow-through can delay substantive outcomes and damage alliances.
-
201.
President Trump is calling for an international coalition, including NATO allies and Asian partners, to militarily secure the Strait of Hormuz as the conflict with Iran enters its third week. The push follows unsuccessful U.S. strikes on Iran's Kharg Island and subsequent Iranian retaliatory attacks on Saudi and UAE energy infrastructure, which have collectively sparked a global energy crisis. By linking ally participation to the future of NATO, the administration is signaling a high-stakes strategy to internationalize the military burden while allies remain cautious about further escalation.
-
202.
An IISS crisis simulation found that Southeast Asian nations lack the 'strategic bandwidth' and specialized literacy required to manage a major nuclear-security escalation involving great powers. Centered on a 2031 scenario of a missing nuclear submarine, the exercise highlighted that regional states rely on the SEANWFZ Treaty as a baseline but struggle to bridge the divide between China and the AUKUS partnership. Consequently, the report recommends that ASEAN enhance domestic inter-agency coordination and utilize the ADMM-Plus framework to more effectively address nuclear-related regional security threats.
-
203.
A RAND study, based on expert consensus, outlines an 'ideal' integrated policy framework for early cancer care. Developed through a three-phase Expert Consensus Panel and Validation Workshops involving global cancer policy experts, the framework identifies key components such as Public Education, Primary Care Capacity, and Data Infrastructure as highly important. The research emphasizes that advancing early cancer care requires a unified, system-wide approach built on collaboration, equity, and sustained investment, moving beyond isolated interventions. Policymakers should integrate education, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and system strengthening, adapting to national and local contexts for long-term sustainability and equitable patient outcomes.
-
204.
The 2026 NPT review conference faces significant obstacles following the expiration of the New START treaty and a shift in US nuclear policy toward more aggressive deterrence and less emphasis on denuclearization. Experts caution that allegations of secret nuclear tests and the potential resumption of global testing threaten to unleash a new arms race, undermining decades of non-proliferation efforts. As confidence in traditional US security guarantees and NATO’s Article V wanes, European allies are increasingly compelled to seek alternative collective defense and deterrence arrangements.
-
205.
Stuart Reid, a senior fellow at CFR and former executive editor of Foreign Affairs, highlights the essential role of clear, 'translated' prose in making complex global issues accessible to a broad audience. His career emphasizes the value of specialized regional knowledge, demonstrated by his extensive work on African politics and the 1960 Congo crisis featured in his book, The Lumumba Plot. The interview underscores that combining editorial rigor with primary archival research is vital for documenting historical foreign policy entanglements and informing modern diplomatic understanding.
-
206.
The article argues that the convergence of low-cost drone technology and precision guidance has ushered in an era of 'precise mass' warfare, first demonstrated in Ukraine and now fully manifest in the U.S.-Iran conflict surrounding Operation Epic Fury. The authors highlight a critical cost-exchange imbalance: defending against $20,000-$50,000 Shahed-136 drones requires interceptors costing $125,000 to $4 million each, rapidly depleting limited air defense stockpiles across the Gulf states and potentially drawing down Indo-Pacific reserves needed to deter China. The implications are stark—the U.S. must dramatically increase investment in attritable, scalable systems like LUCAS beyond the current 0.5% of defense spending, as precise mass capabilities are becoming a permanent feature of modern warfare that empowers both great powers and lesser states alike.
-
207.
This Brookings-RAND joint initiative examines whether current U.S. policy toward Taiwan and cross-strait relations remains adequate amid a deteriorating security environment in the Taiwan Strait. Through a series of expert workshops, the project explores five distinct policy pathways: limiting U.S. commitments while boosting Taiwan's self-defense, calibrating diplomacy to stabilize cross-strait dynamics, pursuing a more active denial strategy, and shifting toward strategic clarity. The analysis weighs how each option would affect U.S. deterrence posture, Taiwan's domestic politics, Beijing's strategic calculus, and broader Indo-Pacific security. The initiative signals growing mainstream debate within the U.S. policy community about whether the longstanding framework of strategic ambiguity should be revised or replaced, with significant implications for alliance management and escalation risk in the region.
-
208.
This analysis evaluates the U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran, contending that significant military successes in degrading nuclear and missile capabilities have not yet triggered the regime's collapse. Key indicators, such as the stable succession of Mojtaba Khamenei and the lack of military defections, suggest that the theocracy is consolidating into a 'rump state' capable of sustained regional disruption against Gulf energy infrastructure. The authors warn that an exit strategy focused solely on conventional degradation may leave a bloodied regime with even greater incentives to pursue nuclear weapons as an ultimate deterrent, potentially turning tactical victories into a long-term strategic liability.
-
209.
Iran’s new leadership has committed to continuing the conflict, emphasizing ongoing pressure on the Strait of Hormuz and further retaliation against U.S.-Israeli strikes. This defiant stance is met with a similar pledge from Washington to advance military operations, indicating that both sides are preparing for an escalation rather than a diplomatic resolution. The ongoing hostilities have already caused significant global energy shocks, forcing the U.S. to adjust sanctions on other oil producers like Russia to stabilize markets. For regional strategy, these developments suggest a protracted war with high risks of expanded conflict and long-term economic disruption.
-
210.
The conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran has escalated into a significant maritime confrontation in the Strait of Hormuz, threatening global oil supplies and necessitating a potential release of strategic energy reserves. Evidence of this expansion includes the U.S. destruction of Iranian mine-laying vessels and reports of attacks on commercial shipping, alongside a staggering initial war cost of $5.6 billion for Washington within the first two days. Consequently, the war is forcing a strategic pivot of U.S. missile defense assets from East Asia to the Middle East, while highlighting vulnerabilities in global interceptor supplies for other theaters like Ukraine.
-
211.
The article argues that Iran's long-held system of deterrence is failing, suggesting that the country has lost its strategic balance despite external provocations. Using the metaphor of maintaining momentum, the analysis posits that Iran has been losing its stability over the past three years, undermining its regional power projection. This failure implies that the calculus of deterring Iran is shifting, necessitating a reassessment of policy strategies regarding its influence and military capabilities in the Middle East.
-
212.
This podcast episode analyzes the strategic shift in U.S. policy following President Trump's decision to launch a large-scale military campaign against Iran that resulted in the death of the Supreme Leader. Dalia Dassa Kaye argues that while the administration sends mixed messages, the targeting of top leadership signals an uncoordinated attempt at regime change rather than a limited strike on nuclear facilities. She warns that the lack of a viable political alternative or a clear 'day after' plan risks plunging the region into a 'Libya-style' chaotic vacuum characterized by bloody internal conflict and massive refugee flows. Furthermore, the conflict strains relations with Gulf partners who fear the fallout and provides geopolitical openings for China and Russia to exploit American military overextension.
-
213.
Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban have entered a state of 'open war' following lethal cross-border airstrikes triggered by Islamabad’s claims that Kabul is harboring Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants. The escalation has resulted in significant civilian casualties and the failure of mediation efforts by regional actors like Qatar and Saudi Arabia, marking the most severe breakdown in relations since 2021. The conflict threatens to destabilize China’s regional infrastructure projects and could provide operational space for extremist groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda. Consequently, the breakdown in bilateral ties may force regional powers, including India and Russia, to recalibrate their diplomatic strategies toward the Taliban regime.
-
214.
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's visit to Washington seeks to reinforce the U.S.-Japan alliance through $550 billion in strategic investment pledges and record-breaking defense spending. However, the partnership is being strained by new U.S. tariff offensives and the redirection of American military assets from the Indo-Pacific to address escalating conflicts in the Middle East. Tokyo faces a difficult balancing act as it navigates U.S. demands for maritime assistance in the Strait of Hormuz while attempting to maintain credible deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Ultimately, the visit highlights a growing tension where Washington-driven economic and security shocks are complicating Japan's pursuit of strategic autonomy and regional stability.
-
215.
The UK government faces a widening fiscal gap in its defense budget, threatening the implementation of its 2025 Strategic Defence Review and commitments to NATO. Despite pledges to reach a 3.5% GDP spending target, the Ministry of Defence already contends with a £17 billion equipment funding deficit and potential cuts to major land and naval programs. Failure to reconcile these gaps through increased taxation or borrowing may force the UK to either abandon its nuclear capability or cede its status as Europe’s leading military power. The forthcoming Defence Investment Plan will be the ultimate test of whether Britain can realistically sustain its global security ambitions.
-
216.
Chatham House argues that Iran's long-standing 'forward defence' strategy has backfired, drawing the Islamic Republic into a direct and existential war with the U.S. and Israel. The systemic weakening of the 'axis of resistance'—marked by the fall of the Assad regime and significant losses for Hezbollah and Hamas—has collapsed the proxy-based shield Tehran used to avoid direct confrontation. As a result, Iran faces a severe degradation of its regional influence and must now manage a conflict on its own soil that it spent four decades trying to externalize. This strategic 'boomerang' likely necessitates a fundamental and painful reconfiguration of Iran’s national security doctrine.
-
217.
Charles Kupchan argues that the Trump administration should pursue a strategy of neutralizing Iran's regime rather than attempting to topple it, advocating for an 'Islamic Republic 2.0' with moderate leadership and strict constraints on its nuclear, missile, and proxy capabilities. He draws on the disastrous outcomes of U.S.-led regime change in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria to warn that dismantling the Islamic Republic would likely produce state fracture, civil war, and regional instability rather than democracy. The article notes that Iran's deeply embedded security apparatus—over one million troops plus paramilitary forces—makes regime collapse unlikely through airpower alone, while arming ethnic minorities risks igniting a multi-country civil war. Kupchan recommends focusing military strikes on degrading Iran's military capability while maintaining diplomatic channels to pragmatic Iranian elites, arguing that a defanged regime, even if imperfect, is far preferable to the chaos of state collapse.
-
218.The Iran war is exacting a heavy toll on Gulf oil and gas exporters – and creating risk and opportunity in North Africa (Chatham House)
The US-Israeli conflict with Iran is severely disrupting Gulf energy exports through the Strait of Hormuz, forcing major producers to rely on insufficient and vulnerable alternative pipeline routes. This disruption is straining national budgets, especially in oil-dependent Iraq, and threatening the long-term market share of Gulf LNG as Asian buyers seek more reliable suppliers. In North Africa, the crisis presents a dual reality where energy importers like Egypt face significant inflationary pressures, while exporters like Algeria benefit from higher prices. These developments underscore the strategic fragility of the Gulf's economic model and may accelerate a permanent global shift in energy trade patterns and infrastructure.
-
219.
Max Boot argues that Operation Epic Fury suffers from a critical "strategy gap," where tactical military successes—such as precision strikes on Iranian leadership—fail to achieve clear political objectives or a viable exit strategy. While the U.S. has degraded Iranian infrastructure, Tehran has successfully retaliated by closing the Strait of Hormuz and depleting American munitions stocks at an unsustainable rate. This rapid consumption of high-tech interceptors like Patriot missiles creates significant strategic vulnerabilities in other theaters, particularly regarding China and North Korea. Ultimately, the conflict underscores the limits of U.S. military power in translating tactical dominance into long-term political or economic stability.
-
220.Term Member and Young Professionals Screening and Discussion of "Jean Monnet, Europe’s Adventurer" (CFR)
This discussion of Jean Monnet’s legacy argues that his 'functionalist' method of building shared sovereignty through technical cooperation remains essential for revitalizing European integration and transatlantic stability. Panelists identified modern catalysts for unity, such as digital sovereignty and AI, while advocating for a 'pragmatic federalism' where smaller coalitions move forward on defense and diplomacy to bypass current EU institutional gridlock. The findings emphasize that the European project must return to Monnet's principle of transforming specific points of friction into common goods to address contemporary geopolitical threats and internal fragmentation.
-
221.
Marion Messmer argues that international security is becoming increasingly volatile due to the proliferation of nuclear deterrence and the democratization of military technology like drones. She highlights how intangible advancements in AI and cyber-operations are reshaping the battlefield, making it harder to track adversaries and manage escalation. Ultimately, she suggests that while technology and non-state actors present significant new risks, incorporating diverse perspectives into the male-dominated security field is essential for building more resilient and durable peace.
-
222.
The article argues that Iran's pattern of limited, calibrated hostilities in the region is breaking down following the US-Israel conflict. Previously, Iran restricted its attacks to proxies or US/Israeli installations; however, it has dramatically expanded the battlefield by directly targeting vital infrastructure in neighboring Gulf states. This escalation suggests a rapid deterioration of regional stability and signals a move away from controlled deterrence. Policymakers must anticipate a significantly higher risk of a full-scale regional conflagration, necessitating immediate reassessment of deterrence strategies and security cooperation.
-
223.
The analysis argues that despite massive, successful strikes that have crippled Iran's leadership, navy, and military infrastructure, the Islamic Republic remains a persistent and unpredictable threat. While the regime is severely degraded, its inherent resilience suggests that outright collapse is unlikely. The primary danger, therefore, is not the state's failure, but the resulting regional instability and power vacuums created by its decline. Policy must shift focus from anticipating regime collapse to managing the complex, unpredictable fallout and potential proxy conflicts in the Middle East.
-
224.
The analysis concludes that even if the Iranian regime survives the current conflict greatly weakened, it will remain a significant and dangerous regional threat. This persistence is due to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which holds the true coercive power, ensuring that the regime will prioritize maintaining the status quo over radical change. The leadership succession, whether through Mojtaba Khamenei or a successor, will be driven by vengeance and resistance, guaranteeing continued instability and potential for terrorism. Strategically, this suggests that external military intervention is unlikely to achieve a swift regime collapse, necessitating a long-term strategy focused on managing persistent regional volatility.
-
225.
This CFR report outlines the catastrophic collapse of U.S.-Iran relations, culminating in a massive joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign in February 2026. Following failed nuclear talks and the failure of 'maximum pressure' sanctions, the conflict escalated to direct strikes that killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and targeted Iran's nuclear and naval assets. These events have triggered immediate regional retaliation, including Iranian strikes on U.S. Gulf bases and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, presenting a severe threat to global energy stability and risking a broader regional war.
-
226.
The Mitchell Institute argues that the U.S. Air Force requires significant investment in long-range, stealthy penetrating airpower to effectively deny adversaries operational sanctuaries. It asserts that decades of force cuts and deferred modernization have degraded combat capacity, leaving the service unable to simultaneously meet multiple strategic defense objectives. Consequently, scaling these advanced capabilities is presented as a critical national choice necessary to maintain deterrence and ensure victory in future conflicts.
-
227.
This article advocates for a robust U.S. strategy to support Iranian protesters, arguing that the current unrest presents a unique opportunity to topple the Islamic Republic and strike a blow against Chinese influence. The author contends that the regime's military weakness, exposed by recent U.S. strikes, and its economic failure have emboldened the populace despite Chinese-designed internet suppression tools. To assist the uprising, the piece suggests utilizing kinetic and cyberattacks against Iran's National Information Network to restore protester communications. Successfully weakening Tehran would undermine Beijing’s regional energy access and strategic foothold in the Middle East.
-
228.
Ambassador Jeffrey Feltman reflects on his 2012 meeting with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, highlighting the Supreme Leader's paranoid obsession with United States 'enmity' and his conviction that America was a declining, malicious power. During the encounter, Khamenei ignored standard diplomatic topics to deliver a lengthy monologue indicting U.S. foreign policy and predicting its internal collapse, dismissing diplomatic overtures as deceptive ruses. This rigid ideological hostility drove Iran’s regional proxy warfare and nuclear ambitions, indicating that Khamenei viewed negotiations primarily as a tactical means to buy time. The reflection underscores how the Supreme Leader's unshakeable distrust shaped decades of Iranian policy, persisting through major escalations until his death in early 2026.
-
229.
Iraq faces a critical threat of internal collapse as it becomes an involuntary staging ground for escalating hostilities between Iran, Israel, and the United States following the assassination of Ali Khamenei. Despite a weakened interim government, Iraqi political and religious leaders like Grand Ayatollah Sistani are striving to maintain neutrality to prevent a descent into multi-front civil conflict involving various paramilitary and ethnic groups. The country's stability is currently jeopardized by retaliatory strikes on its soil and disruptions to vital oil and electricity infrastructure. Consequently, the United States should avoid escalatory military actions within Iraq and prioritize diplomatic partnerships to preserve the country's role as a regional stabilizer.
-
230.
European leaders have responded in a fragmented manner to the uncoordinated U.S.-Israeli military strikes on Iran, revealing deep internal divisions regarding the use of force and international law. While countries like Poland and Germany offer political or conditional support, France and Southern European nations have voiced legal criticisms, highlighting a lack of unified strategic weight. The conflict underscores Europe's continued dependence on the United States even as it pursues greater autonomy through increased defense spending and independent financial support for Ukraine. Ultimately, the war in the Middle East threatens to distract Washington from the European theater and disrupt energy markets, further straining the transatlantic relationship.
-
231.
Brookings experts argue that the U.S.-Israeli decapitation strike against Iran’s leadership is unlikely to trigger an immediate regime collapse, risking instead a protracted conflict and regional instability. The analysis highlights the resilience of the Islamic Republic's institutional networks and its escalatory survival strategy, which targets neighboring energy infrastructure to force diplomatic concessions. Policymakers are warned that without a coherent 'day after' plan or the integration of civilian statecraft, the intervention could lead to a 'lose-lose' scenario of state fragmentation and emboldened global adversaries.
-
232.
This analysis posits that while AI is a transformative "A+" technology, firms like OpenAI face an "F-" business model with a high risk of a financing cliff due to astronomical capital requirements and projected losses of $660 billion by 2030. Market fragility is evidenced by the "SaaS-pocalypse" and the potential for a "jobless expansion" as firms freeze hiring while awaiting productivity gains that have yet to appear in macroeconomic data. Consequently, the authors suggest resolving the "AI trilemma" by implementing a safety tax to fund independent research and empowering a national safety institute with veto authority over high-risk models to prevent societal and geopolitical disruption.
-
233.
The joint U.S.-Israeli strikes against Iran and the subsequent death of Supreme Leader Khamenei have turned the Strait of Hormuz into a volatile maritime flashpoint, severely threatening global energy markets. In response to Iranian retaliation and threats of a blockade, vessel traffic through the waterway has dropped by 70%, causing Brent crude and natural gas prices to surge. While U.S. military operations have significantly degraded Iran's formal naval capacity, the continued use of asymmetric tactics like drone strikes and mine-laying forces expensive shipping diversions. This escalation highlights the fragility of regional maritime security and the immediate risk of a broader conflict disrupting essential global trade routes.
-
234.
The ongoing conflict with Iran significantly raises the risk of asymmetric retaliation against the U.S. homeland, encompassing lone-wolf terrorism, cyberattacks, and strikes on critical infrastructure. Historically, Tehran has utilized sleeper agents and criminal proxies for state-sponsored terrorism, suggesting that revenge for recent strikes may be deferred until high-profile events like the World Cup. However, U.S. defensive capabilities are currently strained by the Department of Homeland Security's shift toward immigration enforcement and significant workforce cuts in specialized counterintelligence units. Consequently, experts urge an immediate re-prioritization of counterterrorism resources to address these evolving unconventional security threats.
-
235.
The military conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran has severely disrupted energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz, threatening twenty percent of global oil and gas supplies and disproportionately impacting Asian economies. While nations like Japan are buffered by significant strategic reserves, others like India face immediate risks due to limited storage and recent shifts in import patterns. Ultimately, these supply shocks are expected to drive a temporary resurgence in coal usage for affordability while simultaneously accelerating long-term strategic investments in nuclear and renewable energy to ensure national security and reduce reliance on volatile Middle Eastern transit routes.
-
236.
Brookings experts argue that the Trump administration’s military campaign against Iran lacks a coherent long-term strategy and clear objectives, shifting from nuclear containment to regime change without adequate planning for the resulting power vacuum. While conventional strikes were initially successful, the U.S. remains vulnerable to asymmetric threats like drones and faces massive logistical challenges in evacuating hundreds of thousands of citizens from the region. Analysts emphasize the need for an immediate diplomatic 'off-ramp' and a realistic plan for dealing with a weakened but still-entrenched Iranian regime to avoid prolonged regional instability.
-
237.
The joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran have triggered a major, destabilizing escalation, pushing the region toward a protracted conflagration. Experts argue that Iran's retaliatory strikes were a calculated, existential move, demonstrating a willingness to engage in a long conflict by targeting soft underbellies, such as Gulf neighbors and American assets. This strategy allows Iran to gamble that it can outlast the current U.S. political administration. For policy, the primary implication is managing the risk of regional spillover, mitigating domestic economic fallout, and navigating the highly decentralized and politically charged nature of U.S. decision-making regarding the conflict.
-
238.
The article analyzes a massive U.S.-led military campaign against Iran, which successfully targeted regime leadership, the IRGC, and key military assets like the navy and missile program. However, the strikes conspicuously omitted the Iranian nuclear program, highlighting it as the single, unresolved strategic threat. This suggests that while the military campaign severely degraded Iran's conventional military capacity, it failed to address the core proliferation issue. Consequently, policymakers must recognize that future strategy must pivot away from purely kinetic action and focus on containing or neutralizing the nuclear dimension of the Iranian threat.
-
239.
The report introduces a unified typology of 20 economic shocks across five domains to help analysts understand and anticipate macroeconomic recessions as complex, compound events. By examining the Great Recession and the COVID-19 pandemic, the authors demonstrate how the interaction of exogenous disturbances and endogenous policy responses determines the recovery's trajectory. This analytical framework moves beyond traditional siloed approaches, providing a structured method for modeling the cascading effects of financial, environmental, and demand-side disruptions. Consequently, it serves as a critical resource for policymakers to improve real-time situational awareness and calibrate stabilization efforts more effectively during multi-faceted crises.
-
240.
The analysis concludes that while recent U.S.-Israeli strikes have severely degraded Iran's military and political infrastructure, the regime is highly resilient and likely to survive the immediate conflict due to its deep institutional roots and the opposition's disunity. The article cautions that military action alone cannot achieve regime change, as the ruling elite has a history of enduring crises and maintaining control. Consequently, the U.S. must shift its strategy from confrontation to careful diplomacy. Washington must guide post-conflict dialogue to prevent the current elite from gaining power, instead setting a high bar for any negotiations that promote a genuinely inclusive and humane political transition.
-
241.
The US and Israel have conducted joint military strikes against Iran for the second time in eight months, signaling a significant escalation of regional tensions. While initial strikes focused primarily on Iran's nuclear program, the most recent operation has been sweeping, targeting both Iranian leadership and broader military capabilities. This military action is compounded by high-level political rhetoric, such as Donald Trump calling for "regime change" amid domestic protests. These sustained and expanding strikes suggest a major deterioration of stability in the region, raising the risk of direct conflict escalation.
-
242.
The article posits that the Iranian regime is facing an existential crisis, accelerated by recent military escalations. Key evidence cited includes a joint U.S.-Israeli assault on Iranian military and leadership targets, followed by significant retaliatory missile and drone exchanges. The authors argue that the ultimate objective of these actions is regime toppling, suggesting that the region is moving toward internal instability and potential state collapse. Policymakers must anticipate a volatile shift in regional power dynamics and prepare for a post-Khamenei transition period.
-
243.
Ambassador Robert Blackwill proposes a "resolute global leadership" grand strategy that fuses superior military primacy with a muscular revitalization of the rules-based international order. He argues that recent liberal internationalism proved too passive against adversaries like China and Russia, while the transactional "Trumpism" approach dangerously abandons the alliances and moral frameworks essential to U.S. security. To restore influence, the report advocates for a significant increase in the defense budget, winning the AI technology race, and pivoting military resources to Asia to deter Chinese hegemony.
-
244.
European leaders at the 2026 CFR symposium characterized the war in Ukraine as a generational conflict that has fundamentally transformed Russia into a direct, long-term threat to the continent. To maintain support amidst uncertain U.S. funding, European nations are aggressively increasing defense spending and industrial capacity while fostering Ukraine’s own domestic military-industrial base. Strategic priorities have shifted toward 'strategic autonomy' within NATO, emphasizing robust security guarantees and the deep integration of Ukraine into Western institutions to ensure a durable peace. The panel concluded that European security now depends on transitioning from security consumption to active partnership through sustained military and economic commitment.
-
245.
The Brookings report finds that President Trump’s second-term staffing strategy has prioritized loyalty and extensive pre-transition planning, leading to a more stable senior staff but a highly centralized executive branch. Key evidence includes a record-setting initial pace of nominations facilitated by a 2025 Senate rule change, contrasted by an unprecedented wave of firings targeting inspectors general and officials with 'for-cause' protections. These actions suggest a deliberate effort to remove institutional guardrails and consolidate political power within the White House, significantly reducing the independence of federal agencies.
-
246.
As the Russia-Ukraine war enters its fifth year, a panel of CFR experts argues that Europe must transition from emergency response to a long-term, self-reliant security and recovery architecture. The recommendations emphasize integrating Ukraine’s innovative defense industrial base into European supply chains and preparing for overt Russian provocations that may require European action independent of U.S. support. Strategically, this necessitates balancing robust military deterrence with diplomatic dialogue and modernizing humanitarian aid through agile public-private partnerships to ensure regional stability during and after the conflict.
-
247.
The report argues that the United States must urgently prepare for an imminent leadership transition in Iran—ranging from managed clerical continuity to an IRGC-led military takeover or total regime collapse—following recent internal uprisings and regional conflict. It highlights that while a democratic shift is unlikely in the near term, the transition will likely trigger opportunistic escalation by proxy groups and increased internal repression. Consequently, U.S. strategy should focus on maintaining a strong regional deterrent, supporting Iranian civil society's connectivity, and readying diplomatic frameworks for nuclear transparency and hostage release.
-
248.
Ukraine’s trajectory from 1991 to 2026 demonstrates a persistent struggle for independence defined by Russian military aggression and a shifting international security architecture. Milestones such as the 1994 Budapest Memorandum and the 2022 invasion highlight the failure of early security guarantees, leading to a war of attrition with combined casualties reaching an estimated 1.8 million by early 2026. Recent developments indicate a pivot toward bilateral U.S.-Russia peace summits that often exclude Ukrainian representation, creating a strategic tension between continued Western military support and great-power diplomacy. Ultimately, the ongoing targeting of energy infrastructure and deadlocked negotiations suggest that Ukraine's sovereignty remains precarious despite sustained G7 and NATO commitments.
-
249.
CFR analysts argue that Western policymakers must immediately begin planning for a post-settlement Europe, as a ceasefire in Ukraine will not eliminate Russia's long-term security threat but rather shift it toward hybrid warfare and military testing of NATO cohesion. Potential risks include deepening transatlantic friction over sanctions relief and commercial normalization with Moscow, alongside intra-European disputes regarding defense burden-sharing. To mitigate these threats, the report recommends a G7-coordinated Russia strategy, a revitalized 'Harmel-style' NATO blueprint for dual-track deterrence, and the implementation of new Europe-wide risk reduction measures to stabilize the expanded NATO-Russia border.
-
250.
This CFR event centered on the documentary 'Atomic Echoes,' which examines the multi-generational human and health consequences of the 1945 atomic bombings for both Japanese survivors and American 'atomic veterans.' The discussion highlighted how historical classification and the focus on strategic deterrence often obscure the long-term trauma and radiation-related illnesses suffered by individuals on both sides of the conflict. Policy implications include the urgent need to address the erosion of international nuclear guardrails following the expiration of treaties like New START and the rising risk of inadvertent escalation. Panelists emphasized that human-centered narratives are essential for engaging the public in contemporary debates over nuclear modernization and the sole authority of the executive branch in weapon deployment.
-
251.
A 6-3 U.S. Supreme Court ruling striking down tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) has created significant trade policy volatility, forcing the White House to pivot to Section 122 authorities to maintain levies. Key trading partners including India, Malaysia, and Indonesia are responding by delaying the ratification or implementation of trade deals originally negotiated under the shadow of the now-illegal tariffs. While the decision offers a temporary legal check on executive trade power, the administration's immediate recourse to alternative authorities indicates a sustained period of trade friction and damaged diplomatic leverage in future economic negotiations.
-
252.Assessing Xi’s Unprecedented Purges of China’s Military: Key Developments and Potential Implications (CSIS)
Xi Jinping has conducted an unprecedented purge of the People's Liberation Army (PLA), removing over 100 senior officers and nearly decapitating the Central Military Commission to ensure absolute political loyalty. This campaign has created a significant leadership void, with approximately 52% of top positions impacted, severely undermining the PLA's near-term readiness for complex military operations like a Taiwan invasion. While the purges disrupt immediate capabilities, they enable Xi to replace the 'old guard' with a younger, more technically literate generation of 'intelligentized' officers. Long-term implications include a potentially more aggressive military that is ideologically subservient, though at a heightened risk of strategic miscalculation due to the suppression of realistic operational advice.
-
253.
Four years after Russia's invasion, the conflict has evolved into a long-term war of attrition that requires a transition from short-term aid to a generational strategy for European security. Despite significant casualties and sanctions, Russia has maintained its war effort through economic ties with China and the Global South, while Ukraine has successfully shifted toward deeper defense industrial cooperation with European partners. Experts suggest that because Russia's maximalist goals remain unchanged, Western policymakers must prepare for a multiyear struggle focused on conventional deterrence and cautious escalation management.
-
254.
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA), ruling that the statute does not grant the executive branch the authority to levy duties. The Court reasoned that the Constitution reserves taxing powers for Congress and that IEEPA’s power to 'regulate' imports is distinct from the power to tax. Consequently, the administration has pivoted to Section 122 for temporary 150-day tariffs while launching 'expedited' Section 301 investigations to secure a longer-term legal foundation for its trade agenda. This shift highlights a significant constitutional reinforcement of congressional authority, even as the executive maintains protectionist policies through alternative statutory frameworks.
-
255.
President Trump’s State of the Union address prioritized domestic economic issues and immigration while framing his 'peace through strength' doctrine as a success in stabilizing global conflicts. He defended the continuation of tariffs despite judicial setbacks and highlighted the recognition of a new interim government in Venezuela as a major shift in Western Hemisphere policy. These developments suggest an administration focused on transactional diplomacy and protectionist economic measures, emphasizing increased burden-sharing from both international allies and domestic technology firms.
-
256.
The United States is entering an increasingly dangerous nuclear era as Russia and China simultaneously modernize and expand their arsenals, presenting the unprecedented challenge of facing two nuclear peers. The collapse of the New START treaty has removed critical constraints on strategic forces, while regional instabilities in Iran and the Korean Peninsula further exacerbate the threat environment. These developments are placing immense strain on U.S. extended deterrence commitments and raising risks of allied nuclear proliferation. Consequently, policymakers must urgently reassess foundational assumptions regarding nuclear posture, modernization, and the integration of emerging defense technologies like the "Golden Dome" missile system.
-
257.Securing Ukraine’s Future in Europe: Ukraine's Defense Industrial Base—An Anchor for Economic Renewal and European Security (CFR)
Ukraine’s defense industrial base (DIB) has transformed from a wartime survival mechanism into a high-tech pillar of European security and a central driver for the country's postwar economic renewal. Driven by a 100-fold increase in defense-tech investment and the production of millions of drones, the sector is pivoting toward industrial-scale exports and coproduction models with European allies. The establishment of Ukrainian defense export centers across Europe signals a shift from aid dependency to strategic partnership, aiming to synchronize regulatory standards and attract private venture capital. Successfully integrating this mil-tech ecosystem will require Western policy support for joint certification and risk-sharing to overcome domestic governance hurdles and maximize Europe's collective deterrence.
-
258.
Total U.S. aid to Ukraine reached $188 billion by late 2025, though no new aid legislation has been passed since April 2024, leading European contributions to collectively surpass U.S. support. While the Trump administration continues to deliver previously appropriated funds and facilitates third-party weapon transfers via the PURL program, it has shifted the U.S. stance toward acting as an impartial peace broker. This development underscores a significant pivot in transatlantic burden-sharing and suggests a potential winding down of direct American military assistance.
-
259.
This brief warns that Europe must prepare to independently counter potential low-level Russian conventional attacks, such as drone strikes, as Moscow may exploit declining transatlantic trust to undermine NATO's collective defense. The authors argue that Russia's shift from hybrid 'gray zone' tactics to overt provocations could expose a perceived lack of U.S. reliability, particularly as Washington prioritizes securing a Ukraine peace deal. To mitigate this risk, European governments are urged to establish autonomous command structures, develop independent response menus in coordination with Ukraine, and rapidly bolster native air defense and intelligence capabilities.
-
260.
Stephen M. Walt argues that the current American foreign policy constitutes "predatory hegemony," wherein the U.S. uses its overwhelming power to extract short-term concessions and tribute from both allies and rivals in a zero-sum manner. This aggressive shift is presented as a reaction to the perceived failures and excesses of the post-Cold War unipolar order. The reliance on tactics like tariffs and threats, rather than traditional diplomatic restraint, is fundamentally eroding America's long-term global power and stability. Consequently, the article warns that medium powers must cooperate among themselves to defend their interests and seek a more equitable partnership with the United States.
-
261.
Max Boot argues that the Trump administration must heed military warnings regarding the high risks of a sustained conflict with Iran, which poses far greater dangers than previous limited strikes. Key concerns include potential Iranian attacks on regional oil infrastructure, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and a critical depletion of U.S. precision-guided munitions required for other global theaters like China and Russia. Additionally, the author notes that extended naval deployments are straining military readiness while a lack of regional ally support complicates any exit strategy. Consequently, a prolonged conflict could severely weaken U.S. strategic posture and global economic stability without guaranteed regime concessions.
-
262.
The war in Ukraine has inaugurated a new era of 'precise mass' warfare, characterized by the deployment of millions of low-cost autonomous drones that are reshaping the battlefield and blurring traditional front lines. Key evidence includes Ukraine's rapid production of millions of drones and the critical role of Silicon Valley firms in providing AI and satellite connectivity, which often bypasses traditional, slower defense procurement cycles. These developments imply that the U.S. and its allies must urgently adapt their defense industrial bases to prioritize both high-volume production and rapid innovation while managing the strategic risks associated with private sector control of essential military technologies.
-
263.
A RAND survey of over 10,000 U.S. adults reveals that while broad support for legalizing psychedelics remains low compared to cannabis, there is significant public backing for their use in controlled medical and therapeutic settings. The study found that 23% support legal psilocybin use, with nearly half of respondents endorsing supervised administration at medical facilities to address specific health conditions. These findings suggest that public opinion is currently more aligned with medicalized models rather than open retail markets or personal cultivation. For policymakers, this indicates that legislative efforts focusing on supervised therapeutic access are likely to receive more public support than broader legalization frameworks.
-
264.
Flash droughts are rapidly intensifying climate events that represent a new systemic risk because their speed collapses traditional warning timelines and overwhelms existing drought governance frameworks. These events, which have increased in frequency since the 1950s, cause disproportionate damage to agriculture and energy security, as seen in the 2012 U.S. losses and the 2010 Russian heatwave that triggered global food price spikes. To mitigate these risks, policymakers must establish flash droughts as a distinct category, leveraging high-resolution satellite data and anticipatory financing to trigger interventions before losses become inevitable.
-
265.
The CFR Global Energy Tracker reveals that while high-carbon sources still account for 89% of energy consumption across 79 tracked countries, low-carbon alternatives are steadily rising, particularly in developed nations. Significant gains in renewable energy shares in the UK and China demonstrate the impact of declining technology costs, though global energy demand has already surpassed pre-pandemic levels by 6%. The data underscores an uneven global transition, with some nations like Norway and France leading in low-carbon reliance while others remain heavily dependent on coal. Consequently, policymakers must address these regional disparities and the persistent growth in total energy demand to accelerate effective decarbonization strategies.
-
266.
This CFR guide outlines the 'America First' transformation of U.S. foreign policy during the first year of President Trump’s second term, emphasizing a shift toward unilateralism and aggressive economic nationalism. Key developments highlighted include the 2025 National Security Strategy's focus on regional dominance, the military capture of Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro, and significant withdrawals from international organizations and climate agreements. These policies have strained traditional alliances while prioritizing U.S. resource access and domestic border security over global humanitarian assistance. Ultimately, the administration's approach suggests a future of transactional global engagement and a preference for military-backed regime change over multilateral diplomacy.
-
267.Decisive Economic Advantage: Modeling the Transition from Temporary First-Mover Leads to Economic Dominance in Artificial General Intelligence (RAND)
This RAND report introduces the concept of Decisive Economic Advantage (DEA), a state where early leads in Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) become permanent dominance through self-reinforcing feedback loops between technological capability, economic deployment, and capital reinvestment. Using a dynamic economic model and Monte Carlo simulations, the author identifies two primary pathways to dominance: 'frontier-driven' intelligence explosions and 'accumulation-driven' reinvestment moats that can occur even without recursive self-improvement. The findings suggest that strategic intervention leverage decays rapidly as asymmetries widen, implying that policymakers must prioritize early detection of regime shifts and tailor responses—such as export controls or ecosystem containment—to the specific growth mechanism involved.
-
268.
INSS argues that Saudi–UAE ties have shifted from tactical coordination to a structural strategic rivalry over regional leadership, influence, and economic primacy. It cites widening divergence across conflict theaters (Yemen, Sudan, and Qatar diplomacy), competing regional alignments, and escalating economic competition tied to Saudi Vision 2030 and efforts to challenge Dubai’s hub status. The analysis contends this is not a temporary leadership dispute but part of a broader regional reordering, with implications for Gulf cohesion, Red Sea dynamics, and external actors’ planning assumptions. For policymakers, the key takeaway is to avoid treating a Saudi–Emirati bloc as fixed, hedge against further fragmentation, and for Israel in particular avoid appearing to choose sides while preserving channels to both Riyadh and Abu Dhabi.
-
269.
The panel argues that digital public infrastructure (DPI) is now core state infrastructure, and the key policy question is governance: whether identity, payments, and data-sharing rails are built in the public interest rather than left to fragmented or purely private control. Speakers cite international evidence that open and interoperable approaches can scale quickly and cheaply, including India’s Aadhaar/UPI, Brazil’s Pix, Estonia/X-Road adoption elsewhere, and reported cost and inclusion gains from open-source deployments in countries like the Philippines and Rwanda. They contend the UK’s main constraints are not just funding but weak political leadership, low-trust rollout choices (especially around digital ID framing), rigid Treasury/procurement models, and limited iterative delivery capacity. The strategic implication is to pursue small, high-value pilots that build trust, then scale through clear political ownership, procurement reform, open standards, and multi-stakeholder governance to balance sovereignty, resilience, and innovation.
-
270.Venezuela, oil and order: What now for regional security after the US seizes Maduro? (Chatham House)
The panel argues that the U.S. seizure of Maduro marks a broader shift to explicit hemispheric power politics, where Washington is willing to use force based on narrowly defined national interests rather than traditional multilateral norms. Speakers contend that while the operation was tactically successful, it does not resolve Venezuela’s underlying governance, corruption, and institutional collapse, making durable stabilization and democratic transition highly uncertain. They also stress that the oil rationale is weak: Venezuela’s heavy crude, degraded infrastructure, legal uncertainty, and soft global demand make rapid production recovery costly and commercially unattractive, while disruption to China is likely limited. Strategically, the event signals a more fragmented Latin America, pressures partners into pragmatic bilateral bargaining with the U.S., and suggests policymakers should prioritize scenario planning for follow-on interventions, institutional reconstruction pathways, and tighter coordination among non-U.S. actors to preserve regional sovereignty and stability.
-
271.
The panel’s core judgment is that MENA is showing “stabilization in name only”: open wars are partly contained, but underlying drivers of conflict are intensifying. Speakers pointed to converging internal and external pressure on Iran, a Gaza ceasefire that is effectively fragile and incomplete, renewed Saudi-UAE competition (including in Yemen), and Syria’s unsettled political order with Turkey-Israel rivalry layered on top. They also argued that a fragmented global system is producing multi-alignment rather than clear blocs, with licit and illicit financial networks blurring traditional binaries and complicating sanctions and governance. The strategic implication is that regional and Western policymakers should move beyond ad hoc conflict management toward coordinated, multi-actor political processes, while preparing for cross-border spillovers (security, migration, and economic disruption) if current flashpoints reignite.
-
272.Defending NATO’s eastern flank: How Romania is responding to Russian aggression and European rearmament (Chatham House)
The event argues that Romania has become a pivotal frontline state in defending NATO’s eastern flank as Russia’s war against Ukraine reshapes European security. It points to Romania’s exposure to nearby Russian drone incidents, intensified information warfare, and Black Sea military operations, alongside NATO’s decision to host its largest base on Romanian territory, as evidence of its strategic centrality. Romania’s foreign minister frames continued support for Ukraine, defense modernization, and sustained military investment as core to deterrence and alliance resilience. The policy implication is that European rearmament must accelerate and remain coordinated, especially if US engagement in Europe becomes less reliable, to credibly deter further Russian coercion.
-
273.
CFR argues that Trump’s State of the Union is primarily a political reset attempt as he faces low approval, difficult midterm dynamics, and skepticism that presidential rhetoric can quickly shift opinion. The article cites weak polling, slowing GDP growth, persistent goods-trade deficits, and a Supreme Court ruling curbing his use of IEEPA tariffs, leaving narrower options such as Section 122. It also flags major foreign-policy pressure points—Iran, Venezuela, China, NATO, Ukraine, and Gaza—where his messaging may signal priorities but not resolve underlying constraints. The key strategic implication is that while the speech can shape partisan narratives, policy outcomes will be driven more by legal limits on executive trade tools, electoral pressures, and high-risk security decisions that may outpace congressional checks.
-
274.
CFR’s core finding is that Iran’s system is institutionally complex but functionally centered on the supreme leader’s clerical-security network, which constrains elected officials and limits meaningful reform. The article’s reasoning maps how formal bodies—the presidency, majlis, Guardian Council, Expediency Council, Assembly of Experts, and Supreme National Security Council—are structurally shaped by appointment authority, candidate vetting, and IRGC-linked influence tied to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. It argues that recent shocks, including the June 2025 Israeli strikes and the late-2025/2026 protest wave, exposed regime vulnerabilities, yet the state’s coercive response also demonstrated enduring control by hard-line power centers. The policy implication is that strategy toward Tehran should focus on the supreme leader’s orbit and security institutions, combining calibrated pressure and diplomacy while preparing for episodic instability rather than expecting elected offices alone to drive change.
-
275.
CFR argues that Trump’s second-term trade strategy is not a single tariff reset but a rolling, country-by-country restructuring of U.S. trade relations through mostly nonbinding framework deals. The tracker shows that while Liberation Day tariffs set high baselines, subsequent bilateral agreements and exemptions lowered effective rates unevenly and exchanged tariff relief for market-access concessions, purchase pledges, investment commitments, and alignment with U.S. economic-security measures. It also finds these deals are highly flexible and unilateral in design, with weak legal durability, quick-termination provisions, and little congressional constraint, making them closer to instruments of leverage than traditional trade agreements. The policy implication is a less predictable global trade environment where partners must continuously bargain with Washington and balance access to the U.S. market against sovereignty costs and geopolitical exposure, especially vis-a-vis China.
-
276.
The paper argues that the Philippines’ shift to a Comprehensive Archipelagic Defense Concept (CADC) marks a major strategic move from broad modernization toward a geography-centered military posture focused on dispersed basing, longer-range strike, and denial operations. It reasons that worsening threat perceptions of China, especially in maritime border areas and near Taiwan, are driving this transition, but also increasing risks of sharper confrontation and security-dilemma dynamics. The analysis highlights practical constraints, including inter-service rivalry, political vulnerability to Chinese influence operations, and policy ambiguity over foreign basing access, weapons deployments, and partner force integration. Strategically, it suggests Manila should codify clearer baseline defense policies, integrate alliances more explicitly, and refine CADC’s theory of victory so deterrence objectives translate into concrete theater-level outcomes rather than capability acquisition alone.
-
277.
Chatham House argues that many Middle Eastern governments now oppose a US strike on Iran because their threat perception has shifted from fear of Iranian regional dominance to concern about Israeli escalation and the consequences of an Iranian state collapse. It points to the weakening of Iran’s “Axis of Resistance” after 7 October 2023, Israeli military pressure across the region, Assad’s fall, and heightened Gulf alarm after Israel’s September 2025 strike on Doha as evidence of this shift. The analysis says regime-change war and broad containment are viewed by Arab states as dangerous and historically ineffective, with high risks of fragmentation, migration, militancy, and regional spillover. The policy implication is to favor de-escalation and targeted, policy-based pressure on Iran’s nuclear, missile, and proxy activities through diplomacy rather than large-scale military action.
-
278.
Maddox argues that the international system has shifted into destabilizing US-China superpower rivalry, with both powers undermining global peace and prosperity in different ways. She contends that Washington’s transactional unilateralism under Trump and Beijing’s coercive techno-industrial expansion have together weakened alliances, eroded legal norms, and increased risks of conflict, including over Taiwan and transatlantic security. The lecture supports this with examples including tariff coercion, pressure over critical minerals, intensified military signaling, and challenges to institutions such as NATO, the UN system, and global trade mechanisms. Strategically, she calls on non-superpower states to strengthen and build institutions, resolve regional conflicts through principled coalitions, and actively uphold international law to preserve a rules-based order without relying on US leadership.
-
279.
The paper argues that a growing number of European NATO members are rapidly pursuing deep precision strike (DPS) capabilities to address a worsening security environment and the post-INF gap in long-range conventional strike options. It finds broad strategic alignment among ELSA partners on deterrence and war-fighting utility, but highlights major national differences in doctrine, industrial capacity, technological baseline, and motivations—illustrated by France and the UK’s dual deterrence/war-fighting framing versus Germany and Poland’s stronger deterrence-by-punishment focus on Russia. Evidence centers on planned expansion from legacy air-launched systems to ground- and sea-launched cruise and ballistic missiles in the 1,000–2,000+ km range, alongside identified enablers such as ISR and kill-chain integration. Strategically, the paper suggests Europe faces difficult policy trade-offs over budgets, force mix, industrial autonomy versus urgent procurement, and unresolved risks around MTCR constraints, Russian reactions, and regional nuclear stability.
-
280.
CFR argues that Tehran is pursuing a tactical, tightly constrained negotiating posture: it wants sanctions relief while preserving core red lines, and is offering only limited nuclear flexibility. Evidence includes Iran’s insistence on Oman as venue and a nuclear-only agenda, plus signals it could cap low-level enrichment and dilute some highly enriched uranium under IAEA verification, while Washington still demands zero enrichment. The article also notes the coercive backdrop: expanded U.S. military presence, Israeli warnings that talks could buy Iran time, and the regime’s violent domestic consolidation after mass protest crackdowns. Policy-wise, this suggests the United States and partners should pair diplomacy with credible deterrence, structure any relief around verifiable compliance, and account for residual proxy risks (especially the Houthis) despite broader degradation of Iran’s network.
-
281.
The CFR’s 2026 Preventive Priorities Survey identifies a significant rise in global instability, highlighting five high-likelihood, high-impact contingencies including intensifying conflicts in the Middle East, the Russia-Ukraine war, and potential U.S. military operations in Venezuela. Based on a survey of over 600 experts, the report emphasizes a shift toward interstate conflict and identifies domestic political violence in the U.S. and AI-enabled cyberattacks as critical threats to national security. These findings suggest that the reduction of conflict prevention infrastructure and more coercive diplomatic stances increase the risk of the United States being drawn into costly, unpredicted military interventions.
-
282.
The article argues that the traditional model of data center development—characterized by short-term construction jobs and high resource consumption—must be replaced by a 'mutualistic' approach that leverages AI infrastructure for long-term regional prosperity. It highlights that the current AI scale-up has granted local governments new leverage to negotiate for high-value benefits, such as university R&D partnerships, compute access, and shared equity endowments, rather than settling for modest tax revenues. Policymakers are encouraged to move beyond 'race-to-the-bottom' incentive competitions and instead integrate data centers into broader tech ecosystems that drive energy innovation and local talent development. Ultimately, the report suggests that transforming isolated data centers into community-supported AI hubs is necessary to ensure the industry's growth delivers on its promise of widespread economic reindustrialization.
-
283.
CFR argues that President Trump’s new Board of Peace is becoming the central U.S.-led mechanism for shaping Gaza’s postwar order, but its viability hinges on Hamas demilitarization and credible governance arrangements. Evidence cited includes broad diplomatic participation (27 formal members and about 45 expected delegations), expected reconstruction pledges of at least $5 billion, and a governance model that currently excludes Palestinian factions in favor of a separate technocratic committee. Conditions on the ground remain unstable, with limited medical evacuations and returns through Rafah, blocked humanitarian missions, ongoing Israeli strikes, and mutual truce-violation accusations. Strategically, the initiative could accelerate reconstruction and coordination, but exclusion risks and unresolved security control could undermine legitimacy and push Gaza back toward partition or renewed conflict if disarmament and political reintegration fail.
-
284.
The Trump administration has announced plans to revoke the 2009 Endangerment Finding, a move described as the largest deregulatory action in U.S. history that removes the legal basis for capping greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. The administration argues that eliminating these regulations will reduce energy costs and bolster American energy dominance, though the decision faces immediate legal challenges that could reach the Supreme Court. This policy pivot risks ceding leadership in the global electric vehicle and clean energy transition to China while further isolating the United States from international climate cooperation.
-
285.
CFR panelists argued that commodity markets have shifted from a demand-led cycle to a supply- and policy-driven regime, with metals (especially gold and silver) rising while oil remains structurally softer. They cited evidence including sustained central-bank gold purchases since the 2022 reserve-freeze shock, growing investor hedging demand, tariff uncertainty under Section 232, and OPEC+/non-OPEC supply conditions that cap oil despite geopolitical tensions. The speakers assessed that oil spikes are still possible from Iran-related disruptions or labor shocks, but likely temporary unless a major outage occurs; baseline Brent expectations clustered around the high-$50s to low-$60s. Strategically, governments and firms should treat commodities as instruments of national security and currency power (including dollar-denominated oil flows), while preparing for persistent precious-metal strength, selective industrial-metal volatility, and policy tradeoffs in U.S.-Venezuela-Canada energy alignment.
-
286.
The article argues that current U.S. immigration policies focused solely on deterrence are causing significant economic damage, including negative net migration and a $50 billion reduction in consumer spending. It highlights how aggressive enforcement and the closure of legal pathways have resulted in severe labor shortages across agriculture, engineering, and healthcare sectors. Brookings suggests that a balanced approach—combining credible enforcement with expanded lawful pathways and regional diplomacy—is necessary to manage migration sustainably. The analysis concludes that 2026 requires a shift toward modernizing the visa system and reforming asylum processes to ensure long-term economic stability and border order.
-
287.
The article argues that the unusually large U.S. military buildup around Iran has put the Middle East on edge because regional governments see a high risk of conflict but still lack clarity on Washington’s objectives. It points to Gulf states’ refusal to join an attack, dual U.S. carrier deployments, and fears of Iranian retaliation through Strait of Hormuz disruption and proxy strikes, while noting Geneva talks produced only vague “guiding principles” rather than a concrete deal. It also highlights the contradiction between launching a Gaza reconstruction-oriented Board of Peace and simultaneously signaling readiness for military escalation against Tehran. The policy implication is that U.S. strategy must align deterrence with explicit end-states, coalition reassurance, and escalation-control mechanisms to avoid a broader regional war that could derail both Gulf economic priorities and Gaza stabilization.
-
288.
CFR’s brief argues that simultaneous Geneva negotiations on Iran’s nuclear file and the Ukraine war show the Trump administration trying to position Washington as the indispensable conflict broker, but both tracks remain constrained by major unresolved gaps. The report cites concrete escalation signals and bargaining asymmetries: U.S. military deployments and Iranian drills near Hormuz alongside disagreements over deal scope, and in Ukraine, continued Russian strike pressure and territorial demands despite recent Ukrainian battlefield gains. It also notes mixed diplomatic conditions, including European unease with parts of U.S. positioning and broader geopolitical moves by major powers, indicating a fragmented coalition environment. Strategically, the implication is that U.S. diplomacy may secure partial or phased outcomes at best unless paired with stronger leverage, clearer end-state definitions, and tighter allied coordination.
-
289.Norman E. Alexander Family M Foundation Forum on Science and Foreign Policy: U.S. Science and Research in a Changing Landscape (CFR)
The webinar argues that global oil geopolitics has been fundamentally reshaped by Russia’s war in Ukraine, OPEC+ supply management, and shifting demand centers, even as the energy transition advances. Carolyn Kissane stresses that the world still consumes over 100 million barrels per day, with demand growth concentrated in Asia, while Russia has largely sustained exports by redirecting discounted crude to buyers such as India and China. She also highlights that state-owned producers and OPEC+ coordination continue to exert strong influence on prices, making markets vulnerable when supply is curtailed in already tight conditions. The policy implication is a dual-track strategy: preserve short-term energy security and price stability through diversified supply and contingency tools, while accelerating credible decarbonization pathways that account for uneven capacity and financing constraints across regions.
-
290.
Following the brutal suppression of late 2025 protests, Iranian reformists have shifted from advocating gradual internal change to openly challenging the Islamic Republic's foundational legitimacy. Key leaders like Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi are now demanding national referendums on a new constitution, signaling a break from their previous commitment to the regime's core principles. While their current organizational power is weak and public trust has eroded, these figures could serve as a critical ideological bridge and moderate governing alternative during a future period of regime erosion or transition. This potential role is amplified by the lack of other viable, domestically-led opposition groups capable of managing a political shift.
-
291.
CFR argues that a future Taiwan conflict will likely be a protracted, regional war involving multiple actors and external triggers, rather than a contained three-way contest. The report warns that China’s military modernization and gray-zone tactics have eroded U.S. deterrent advantages and shortened operational warning times. To address these new risks, the U.S. must shift from isolated planning to deeply integrated, pre-crisis consultative mechanisms with regional allies like Japan and the Philippines.
-
292.
The U.S. and Iran face a volatile '50/50' chance of either military conflict or a symbolic diplomatic framework as an unprecedented U.S. military build-up meets low-trust negotiations in Geneva. While the Trump administration seeks a high-profile declaration of victory, Iran demands a formal negotiated text to ensure sanctions relief amid internal social unrest and Israeli pressure for preemption. Gulf states are actively mediating to avoid a regional war that would jeopardize their multi-billion dollar transitions into global AI and digital hubs. Consequently, any tactical miscalculation, particularly involving proxies like the Houthis, could trigger a wider entanglement with severe global economic and security repercussions.
-
293.
CFR argues that Iran still does not have a nuclear weapon, but it retains the technical base to move quickly toward one and continues to field the Middle East’s most extensive ballistic missile arsenal despite major Israeli and U.S. strikes in 2025. The piece cites IAEA findings of sharply increased near-weapons-grade enrichment, evidence of undeclared nuclear-related activity, and estimates that Iran’s breakout timeline for fissile material could be very short, while missile capabilities include systems with roughly 2,000 km range and demonstrated use in 2024 attacks on Israel. It also notes that military strikes may have delayed but not eliminated Iran’s program, as rebuilding and renewed U.S.-Iran talks in Oman suggest coercion alone has limits. Strategically, the article implies policymakers need a combined approach of verifiable nuclear constraints, missile/proxy limits, calibrated sanctions relief, and credible deterrence to reduce risks of regional war, proliferation, and escalation through miscalculation.
-
294.
Chatham House argues that the 2026 security environment is being transformed by overlapping geopolitical, military, and technological shocks that are testing established alliances and institutions. Its reasoning highlights NATO burden-sharing strains around 5% defence spending targets, strategic recalibration under a renewed Trump administration, China’s military modernization alongside Indo-Pacific flashpoints, and persistent interstate/proxy conflicts in the Middle East. It also emphasizes that climate-conflict dynamics, critical materials competition, and increasingly sophisticated cyber and espionage activity are blurring traditional warfighting domains. The policy implication is that governments and industry should prioritize cross-domain strategy, stronger public-private defence partnerships, and more efficient use of rising defence budgets to build resilience and credible deterrence.
-
295.
The article argues that the EU’s 2026 designation of the IRGC as a terrorist organization marks a decisive break from three decades of engagement-based Iran policy. It says Europe’s old balance of pressure and dialogue collapsed after cumulative shocks: Iran’s military support to Russia after 2022, repression following Mahsa Amini’s death, failure to restore the nuclear deal in 2023, and UN snapback sanctions in 2025. The immediate trigger was the scale of the early-2026 crackdown, which convinced European governments there were no credible Iranian interlocutors left and that non-designation carried unacceptable reputational costs. Strategically, the move raises legal and compliance risks for EU and non-EU firms tied to Iran while likely reducing the EU’s diplomatic leverage, leaving Europe more sidelined in US-Iran decision-making.
-
296.
Chatham House argues that Trump’s energy-dominance agenda is delivering visible short-term gains in US oil and LNG output, but global market dynamics make sustained political control over energy trajectories difficult. The article points to record US oil production, LNG export growth above 20%, coal-plant retention measures, and ambitious nuclear expansion goals, while also noting renewables still took most new US power capacity in 2025 and globally covered all demand growth as they surpassed coal in generation. It emphasizes that energy investment cycles run 5–10 years, so current outcomes reflect earlier decisions and require long policy continuity to lock in structural change. For strategy, the US may gain near-term geopolitical leverage over prices and supply chains, but allies’ mixed responses, persistent renewable cost competitiveness, and deeper US exposure to hydrocarbon regions limit long-term dominance and complicate policy tradeoffs.
-
297.
The expiration of the New START treaty on February 5, 2026, marks the end of formal limits on U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, raising significant risks of a new arms race and strategic miscalculation. Experts warn that the loss of robust verification measures and on-site inspections will erode intelligence precision, likely prompting both superpowers to 'upload' reserve warheads onto existing delivery systems. To maintain stability, U.S. policy must balance necessary modernization—such as reopening submarine missile tubes—with the urgent pursuit of a follow-on agreement that ideally addresses non-strategic weapons and China's growing nuclear capabilities.
-
298.
This CSIS analysis maps four potential oil supply disruption scenarios resulting from a possible U.S. military strike against Iran, warning that Tehran's current vulnerability may drive it to target regional energy infrastructure as a last resort. The report details how direct attacks on Arab Gulf facilities could push global oil prices above $130 per barrel, particularly as bypass routes for the Strait of Hormuz remain significantly limited in capacity. These dynamics present a strategic dilemma for the Trump administration, where escalating military pressure could trigger a global energy crisis or a 'use it or lose it' miscalculation by Iranian leadership.
-
299.
Greek Foreign Minister George Gerapetritis argued that Europe is in a transition period requiring both stronger strategic autonomy and continued transatlantic cohesion, rather than a rupture with the United States or NATO. He supported higher European defense burden-sharing, warned that a sustainable Ukraine settlement must be fair and sovereignty-based, and maintained confidence that NATO Article 5 remains credible despite current political volatility. On the Middle East, he backed a UN-anchored Gaza stabilization framework, welcomed coordination with the proposed Board of Peace only within a limited Gaza mandate, and stressed that disarming Hamas must be paired with governance and education to prevent renewed extremism. He also framed Greece as a strategic energy and logistics hub and linked EU trade deals with India and Mercosur to a wider strategy of diversification, implying policymakers should reduce overreliance risks while preserving rules-based multilateral institutions.
-
300.
The column argues that Trump’s 2026 National Defense Strategy (NDS) is built on prioritization and burden-sharing, but the Iran crisis could expose a gap between that framework and the president’s willingness to intervene aggressively. Froman points to NDS language that shifts U.S. focus toward homeland and hemispheric defense, expects allies in Europe and the Indo-Pacific to assume more conventional responsibilities, and seeks a limited “decent peace” with China rather than outright dominance. He contrasts that restraint with Trump’s military signaling toward Iran, including carrier redeployment and maximal demands, while warning that Iran is far harder to coerce or reshape than Venezuela and could produce prolonged instability after any regime shock. The strategic implication is that U.S. policy must keep Iran actions tightly bounded to avoid a costly quagmire that would undermine NDS prioritization and broader force posture goals.
-
301.
The panel argues that China under Xi is pursuing a long-term effort to reshape international order around sovereignty, regime security, and reduced Western dominance, while avoiding costly ideological bloc politics. Speakers cite evidence including Beijing’s security-first governance model, parallel institution-building (e.g., BRI, AIIB, SCO, BRICS-adjacent platforms), efforts to de-risk supply chains and build economic leverage, and selective mediation diplomacy aimed especially at the Global South. They also emphasize tensions in China’s approach: it promotes an alternative governance narrative but still works inside existing institutions, and its global ambitions are constrained by domestic economic pressures and external pushback. For policymakers, the implication is to treat China’s strategy as structural and adaptive rather than episodic, requiring coordinated responses on economic resilience, technology dependence, and coalition-based diplomacy rather than issue-by-issue reactions.
-
302.
Chatham House’s event frames the war in Ukraine as a hard-power contest whose outcome will shape Europe’s wider security order. General Valerii Zaluzhnyi is positioned to argue that battlefield developments should directly inform diplomatic expectations about war termination rather than optimism detached from military realities. The session emphasizes building a common European security strategy, with specific focus on the UK’s role and Ukraine’s contribution to allied defence and deterrence capacity. For policymakers, the implication is to prioritize long-term military readiness, tighter UK-Europe-Ukraine coordination, and strategy grounded in operational conditions on the front.
-
303.
From 1994 to 2023, U.S. immigrants—including both legal and undocumented populations—generated a cumulative fiscal surplus of $14.5 trillion, significantly reducing national budget deficits and lowering the debt-to-GDP ratio. This positive impact stems from immigrants' higher labor force participation rates and higher per capita tax contributions combined with lower consumption of government benefits like Social Security and education compared to the U.S.-born population. The study concludes that immigration has functioned as a critical buffer against a national debt crisis, suggesting that restrictive immigration policies would likely exacerbate fiscal instability rather than resolve it.
-
304.
Chatham House argues that a second Trump presidency signals a shift from US hegemony to a more openly imperial foreign policy built on coercive leverage rather than alliance stewardship. It cites transactional diplomacy, disregard for international norms, threats toward allies such as Denmark over Greenland, and the operation to capture Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro as evidence of greater willingness to use force in support of a hemispheric dominance strategy. The analysis says this approach weakens NATO cohesion and broader European security assumptions while creating a more volatile environment in which states inside and outside Washington’s preferred orbit must recalibrate. It also concludes that Russia and China face a mix of risk and opportunity as US policy becomes more confrontational, producing a brittle order with higher miscalculation risk.
-
305.
INSS argues that current U.S. force posture in CENTCOM reflects a pre-crisis phase combining coercive diplomacy with credible military readiness against Iran, while trying to avoid a long war. It cites roughly 40,000 U.S. personnel, a carrier strike group near Oman, multiple destroyers, expanded strike and ISR assets, reinforced missile defenses, and elevated airlift as evidence of preparations beyond symbolic signaling. The analysis also contends Iran is under heavy internal and external pressure but remains regime-stable, making diplomacy appear tactical and time-buying rather than genuinely de-escalatory. Strategically, this posture may strengthen deterrence and bargaining leverage, but it also raises the risk of miscalculation and rapid escalation among the U.S., Iran, and Israel.
-
306.
Chatham House frames Trump’s conflict strategy as a deliberate break from traditional diplomacy, centered on his pledge to act as a “peacemaker and unifier” through high-pressure dealmaking. The core logic is transactional: use US leverage to force adversaries into negotiations and lock in outcomes across multiple conflicts, including Ukraine, Gaza, the South Caucasus, and the DRC. The event description highlights mixed and disputed results, arguing that while this approach can create openings, it also unsettles allies and even parts of Trump’s domestic base that see tension with an America First posture. For policymakers, the key implication is that US-led peacemaking may become more coercive and personalized, requiring partners to adapt quickly while planning for uneven sustainability and credibility risks across simultaneous theaters.
-
307.
Chatham House argues that US global influence remains substantial but is increasingly perceived as declining, particularly in economic terms, as China, India and Russia gain weight. The analysis points to policy volatility and experimentation across major dossiers, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Paris climate accord, the Iran nuclear deal, and relations with the EU, Russia and North Korea. At the same time, persistent transnational challenges such as trade, climate change, nuclear risk and terrorism are presented as areas where US engagement is still indispensable. The strategic implication is that Washington’s credibility will depend less on unilateral dominance and more on consistent, coalition-based leadership in managing shared global risks.
-
308.
The article argues that Europe’s sovereignty debate is increasingly split between an integrationist strategy (more EU-level coordination, financing, and industrial policy) and a deregulatory growth strategy (less bureaucracy, stronger national competitiveness). It supports this by contrasting leaders and policy preferences: Macron and Draghi push pooled instruments such as joint procurement and common financing, while De Wever, Merz, and Meloni prioritize regulatory simplification and nationally driven industrial revival. The piece warns that the main danger is not institutional rupture but policy incoherence, where parallel national and EU initiatives in defense and energy create duplication and underpowered outcomes. Strategically, it suggests the most viable path is a calibrated hybrid: selective integration in scale-dependent sectors (defense, tech, energy infrastructure) combined with targeted deregulation to restore growth, with Germany’s choices likely to determine whether that synthesis holds.
-
309.
The article argues that the U.S. must update its narrative on Taiwan, moving away from viewing the island as a 'strategic liability' or a single point of failure for the global economy. It highlights that Taiwan's hardware is the irreplaceable backbone of America's AI ambitions and that conflict with China is not inevitable if a credible military deterrent is maintained. The proposed policy shift emphasizes a middle path: preserving the status quo to allow for an eventual non-coercive resolution while grounding U.S. support in calculated self-interest rather than ideological charity.
-
310.
The Trump administration is aggressively expanding Section 232 tariffs across strategic sectors—from semiconductors to pharmaceuticals—to mitigate national security risks and encourage domestic manufacturing. While aimed at countering China, these tariffs disproportionately affect close allies like Canada and Mexico, who remain the primary suppliers of steel, aluminum, and auto parts. This strategy risks trade friction with partners while highlighting persistent vulnerabilities in supply chains, particularly regarding Chinese control of active pharmaceutical ingredients, critical minerals, and drone components.
-
311.
INSS argues that the U.S.-Iran track is in a temporary de-escalation, but absent major Iranian concessions the risk of renewed military confrontation remains high. The analysis cites deep gaps over Iran’s missile program and proxy support, Trump’s credibility pressures after a large U.S. force buildup, and Iran’s regime-survival mindset amid severe domestic unrest and repression as reasons diplomacy may stall. It also notes that Tehran may show limited flexibility on nuclear issues, especially after damage to enrichment capabilities, while refusing concessions on missiles and regional allies. Strategically, a nuclear-only deal with sanctions relief could stabilize the Iranian regime without resolving core regional security threats, leaving Israel and Gulf partners exposed and requiring continued coercive leverage alongside diplomacy.
-
312.
CFR’s February 22, 2026, nuclear arms control coverage argues that nonproliferation and arms control remain central to managing great-power rivalry and regional nuclear risks. The evidence is the breadth of its featured analyses and backgrounders—spanning the Iran nuclear deal, sanctions on North Korea, and emerging domains such as outer space—plus contributions from multiple senior experts and task-force work. The overall reasoning is that existing regimes still matter but are under pressure from geopolitical competition, enforcement gaps, and technological change. Policy-wise, the implication is to pair deterrence with renewed diplomacy: strengthen treaty frameworks, tighten coordinated sanctions and verification, and update rules for new strategic domains before instability worsens.
-
313.
The paper argues that maritime deterrence in the Straits of Malacca and Singapore is highly localized: security infrastructure reduces risk only in small, place-specific zones, while low-level piracy and armed robbery persist in nearby choke points. Using ReCAAP incident data from 2007 to August 2025, the authors show crime is strongly clustered rather than random, with hotspots concentrated within roughly 50 nautical miles of security infrastructure and much weaker clustering beyond 200 nautical miles. The study reasons that this pattern reflects geography and offender adaptation to predictable patrols, not simple enforcement failure, as criminals shift routes, timing, and tactics around fixed monitoring systems. Policy implication: states should treat SOMS maritime crime as a continuous risk-management problem by reducing surveillance blind spots, increasing patrol unpredictability and operational flexibility, and better synchronizing local enforcement with regional coordination mechanisms.
-
314.
The discussion argues that oil will remain a central geopolitical risk through the near term, even as countries pursue decarbonization, because global demand is still above 100 million barrels per day and continues to rise. Kissane cites evidence that Russia’s war in Ukraine and OPEC+ production cuts have remapped trade flows, tightened supply, and sustained price volatility, while major buyers such as China and India absorb discounted Russian crude. She also notes that energy power is concentrated in a few producers and state-owned firms, with over 75% of global oil controlled by national companies, amplifying political leverage in markets. The strategic implication is that governments should pair energy-transition goals with hard energy-security planning: diversify suppliers, protect critical transport infrastructure, manage strategic reserves prudently, and avoid removing conventional supply faster than resilient alternatives can scale.
-
315.
The article argues that the Trump administration is sprinting toward a military conflict with Iran without a clear casus belli or exit strategy, risking a repeat of past Middle East intervention failures. It highlights how justifications have shifted from nuclear concerns to ballistic missiles and internal protests, often driven by Israeli pressure and policy inertia rather than imminent threats to the United States. The author contends that since Iran's ability to harm American interests is minimal, pursuing an unprovoked war would serve foreign interests over domestic ones and likely lead to an open-ended regional crisis.
-
316.
CFR panelists argued that while Greenland is strategically important for Arctic warning, surveillance, and transatlantic security, U.S. ownership is not necessary to secure core defense interests. They cited the still-valid 1951 U.S.-Denmark defense framework, which already allows expanded U.S. basing and operations, and noted that practical constraints—harsh operating conditions, limited infrastructure, and high costs—undercut both military seizure scenarios and rapid resource exploitation. On critical minerals, speakers stressed that Greenland has potential but development cycles are long, financing is market-driven, and cooperation with allies (especially Denmark, Canada, and Europe) is more realistic than unilateral control. Strategically, the discussion suggests Washington should prioritize negotiated security upgrades and allied supply-chain partnerships, since coercive moves on Greenland would risk damaging NATO cohesion and broader U.S.-Europe coordination.
-
317.
This collection of essays argues that the United States and China must coordinate to mitigate the 'malicious uplift' of non-state actors using advanced AI for cyberattacks, biological weapons, and disinformation. The authors highlight that AI's low cost and high accessibility create systemic risks that traditional arms control cannot easily manage, necessitating shared safety guidelines and crisis communication channels. Ultimately, bilateral cooperation is viewed as a necessary catalyst for a global multilateral non-proliferation framework to prevent 'safety arbitrage' by malicious groups.
-
318.
The article argues that the Trump administration’s reliance on "limited" military force against Iran is a strategic illusion that risks initiating an open-ended "forever war." It highlights that while airpower and covert actions minimize immediate American casualties, they frequently result in severe second-order effects like regional instability, refugee crises, and radicalization, as seen in past interventions in Libya and Syria. Ultimately, the author suggests that the administration should prioritize a diplomatic agreement with Tehran to avoid the very type of protracted conflict the president pledged to avoid.
-
319.2025 Arthur Ross Book Award Ceremony and Meeting: "The Achilles Trap: Saddam Hussein, the C.I.A., and the Origins of America's Invasion of Iraq” (CFR)
At CFR’s 2025 Arthur Ross Book Award ceremony, the central discussion around Steve Coll’s The Achilles Trap argued that the Iraq War stemmed not only from U.S. analytic and policy failures but from a profound misreading of Saddam Hussein’s motives and decision logic. Drawing on newly accessible Iraqi archives, tapes of Saddam’s internal meetings, and interviews, Coll showed that Saddam had largely dismantled key WMD capabilities in 1991 yet preserved ambiguity out of regime psychology, deterrence signaling, and distrust that sanctions would be lifted even with cooperation. The conversation emphasized that U.S. policymakers over-relied on partial intelligence and assumptions, while limited direct contact with Baghdad deepened strategic misperception. The policy implication is to prioritize adversary psychology, maintain calibrated channels of communication with hostile regimes, and apply greater analytic humility before irreversible military decisions.
-
320.
Robert D. Blackwill proposes "resolute global leadership" as the most effective American grand strategy to counter a peer-competitor China and navigate the most dangerous international environment since World War II. The report analyzes five alternative strategic schools, concluding that the U.S. must leverage its unique economic, military, and technological advantages while reconciling itself to a world where its dominance is no longer unchallenged. Key policy recommendations include substantially increasing the defense budget, pivoting military assets to the Indo-Pacific, and re-engaging in multilateral trade frameworks like the CPTPP to revitalize the rules-based order. Ultimately, it emphasizes balancing Chinese power through strengthened alliances and 'peace through strength,' while rejecting military force for purely ideological goals.
-
321.
The panel’s core finding is that the UK can afford warfighting only if it makes earlier, harder political choices on defence spending and reform, because current plans are too slow for the threat timeline. Speakers argued that moving from roughly 2.3% to 3.5% of GDP requires major trade-offs (higher taxes, cuts elsewhere, or more borrowing) and that past procurement failures have weakened confidence that spending converts into usable capability. They stressed that modern conflict would hit the UK homeland through cyber, disinformation, and infrastructure disruption as well as missiles and drones, while reduced US support raises the burden on Europe. Strategically, the UK should accelerate readiness, improve procurement accountability and industrial surge capacity, rebuild stockpiles, and run a more honest national debate on resilience, mobilisation, and societal preparedness.
-
322.
The Chatham House panel argued that shrinking Western aid budgets are no longer just a development issue but a strategic security risk for the UK and its partners. Speakers cited sharp cuts across major donors, disruption from the 2025 USAID retrenchment, and operational impacts such as HALO Trust potentially shrinking from 12,000 to 7,000 staff, warning this will hit fragile and conflict-affected states hardest. They reasoned that reduced support for conflict prevention, multilateral institutions, and long-term partnerships creates space for rival influence, increases instability and migration pressures, and weakens UK diplomatic leverage. For UK strategy, the discussion pointed to prioritizing conflict-focused aid, preserving credible multilateral engagement while using targeted bilateral strengths, rebuilding a clear long-term narrative linking aid to domestic security, and mobilizing non-traditional and private financing to offset fiscal constraints.
-
323.Redrawing global boundaries? The United States, China, and the viability of spheres of influence in the 21 st century (Brookings)
Brookings’ expert roundtable argues that a U.S. "Donroe Doctrine" push for hemispheric primacy is more likely to weaken than strengthen Washington’s position in long-term competition with China, though one contributor contends it could restore deterrence by denying Beijing footholds near U.S. borders. The dominant reasoning is that coercive regional tactics and unilateral moves drain U.S. military bandwidth from the Indo-Pacific, damage alliances, and erode soft power while giving China narrative and diplomatic advantages. Experts also note China’s already deep regional footprint, including major trade, investment, and infrastructure ties across Latin America, which makes a clean spheres-of-influence rollback unrealistic. Strategically, a formal U.S.-China spheres bargain is assessed as unstable and asymmetric: it could pressure smaller states to hedge, accelerate regional militarization and possible nuclear proliferation, and incentivize revisionist claims elsewhere, suggesting U.S. policy should prioritize alliance credibility, rules-based coordination, and positive economic alternatives over coercion.
-
324.
The conflict in Ukraine has settled into a prolonged pattern of attrition and positional fighting, with neither side achieving a decisive breakthrough. While Russia retains tactical advantages, the analysis suggests that time is working against Moscow due to increasing manpower strain and operational failures, preventing the attainment of key objectives like fully securing Donetsk. Strategically, the fighting itself informs the relative leverage of both parties, meaning that external diplomatic pressure to impose a cease-fire is unlikely to succeed. Policymakers must recognize that the war is not nearing a quick end and that sustained, long-term support is required to manage a protracted conflict.
-
325.
China has successfully transitioned from a net energy importer to the world's dominant market maker in clean energy technologies. Key evidence includes its global leadership in manufacturing wind turbines, solar panels, controlling battery supply chains, and exporting competitive electric vehicles. This rapid ascent fundamentally shifts global energy power dynamics, making China a critical strategic player whose dominance requires careful policy and economic countermeasures from Western nations.
-
326.
The article argues that large, dominant political structures, or "Goliaths," historically sow the seeds of their own decline, citing examples from the Roman Empire to modern global powers. The key evidence points to systemic vulnerabilities, including territorial overreach, extreme wealth inequality, environmental degradation, resource scarcity, and institutional corruption. The author posits that the contemporary Goliath is not a single nation but a globalized capitalist civilization facing unprecedented stress from climate change, pandemics, and a fragmenting global system. Policy implications suggest that mitigating these systemic risks—rather than focusing solely on geopolitical competition—is crucial for preventing a major societal collapse.
-
327.
The article argues that global population aging and shrinking working-age populations will fundamentally constrain the capacity of major states to wage war, leading to a potential 'geriatric peace.' This theory is supported by demographic trends, such as China's projected dramatic decline in its working-age population, which limits both resources and manpower for conflict. While acknowledging that demographic factors are not deterministic—citing Russia's invasion of Ukraine as a counterexample—the analysis suggests that these limitations will dampen the pressures for large-scale great power conflict, particularly between the US and China. Policymakers should factor demographic decline into long-term strategic planning, recognizing it as a structural brake on military escalation.
-
328.The Upside of U.S.-Chinese Strategic Competition: Institutional Balancing and Order Transition in the Asia Pacific (Foreign Affairs)
The analysis argues that U.S.-Chinese strategic competition is unlikely to escalate into military conflict due to nuclear deterrence and deep economic interdependence. Instead, the rivalry is channeled through multilateral institutions, which forces constructive reforms and generates positive regional dividends. Key evidence includes China's establishment of the AIIB, which spurred reform in other development banks, and the subsequent strengthening of organizations like ASEAN and the UN. Policymakers should view this great-power competition not merely as a source of friction, but as a powerful, albeit challenging, mechanism driving institutional balancing and positive order transition across the Asia Pacific.
-
329.Strange Stability: How Cold War Scientists Set Out to Control the Arms Race and Ended Up Serving the Military-Industrial Complex (Foreign Affairs)
The analysis examines how Cold War scientists reframed nuclear policy, arguing that the goal was not disarmament, but rather stabilizing the arms race through controlled deterrence. While these thinkers provided valuable intellectual frameworks for policymakers, their actual influence on nuclear decision-making was less pronounced than commonly believed. The core finding is that the concept of 'stability' allowed analysts to organize thought, even if they were skeptical of total disarmament. For policy, this suggests that understanding the political dynamics that sideline scientific input is crucial for developing modern arms control strategies and managing great power competition.
-
330.
The conflict in Ukraine demonstrates that modern great-power warfare is characterized by sustained, highly destructive conventional conflict and a fragile, elevated risk of nuclear escalation, rather than quick, decisive outcomes. While Russia's nuclear threats are significant, Ukraine's resilience and ability to strike deep into Russian territory show that nuclear weapons do not guarantee coercive leverage. Consequently, the U.S. must update its defense planning to prepare for protracted wars of attrition with nuclear-armed adversaries, focusing on strengthening deterrence, coordinating with allies, and maintaining readiness for extended, high-stakes conflicts.
-
331.Export Controls on Artificial Intelligence and Uncrewed Aircraft Systems: Interagency Challenges (RAND)
This RAND report argues that current U.S. export controls for AI and uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) are lagging behind rapid technological advancements and require a more agile, data-centric interagency approach. The study finds that the U.S. no longer maintains a technological monopoly, meaning overly restrictive controls risk hollowing out the domestic industrial base and driving global partners toward Chinese alternatives. Consequently, the authors recommend shifting regulatory focus toward specialized military training data rather than ubiquitous hardware, while calling for increased funding and technical expertise for the Bureau of Industry and Security.
-
332.Developing a Risk-Scoring Tool for Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Biological Design: A Method to Assess the Risks of Using Artificial Intelligence to Modify Select Viral Capabilities (RAND)
RAND developed a dual-axis risk-scoring tool to evaluate the biosecurity threats posed by AI-enabled biological design, focusing on five critical viral functions such as host range and transmission dynamics. The framework assesses both the potential severity of biological modifications and the technical capability required by actors, specifically measuring the 'uplift' that advancing AI provides to lower-skilled individuals. Researchers concluded that as AI tools become more accessible, the technical barriers to engineering dangerous pathogens will continue to decrease, necessitating new oversight mechanisms. Consequently, the report proposes using this scoring system as a foundation for establishing regulatory redlines and federal funding requirements to manage AI-driven biological risks without stifling innovation.
-
333.Manpower Analysis to Improve the Functional Alignment and Organizational Structure of Space Training and Readiness Command Headquarters (RAND)
A RAND analysis finds that the U.S. Space Force’s STARCOM headquarters is significantly understaffed, requiring nearly double its current personnel to effectively manage its workload and mission priorities. The study identifies core organizational friction stemming from a lack of unity of effort, structural tensions between lean design and command needs, and resource strain caused by simultaneous start-up and steady-state functions. Researchers recommend implementing a new staffing optimization model (STAR-SOM) and realigning leadership under senior authorities to better synchronize guardian development and combat credibility missions. These findings imply that STARCOM must pursue both a quantitative manpower increase and a qualitative structural reorganization to maintain readiness for near-peer space competition.
-
334.
This report analyzes the evolving demographics and welfare needs of the Royal Navy and Royal Marines (RN&RM) community, projecting a stable Regular force of approximately 33,000 through 2040 despite a more volatile strategic environment. It finds that increasing operational tempo and unpredictable deployments are placing significant strain on families, evidenced by high levels of partner loneliness and chronic childcare accessibility issues. The study suggests that the Naval welfare sector must modernize its support by adopting holistic, 'whole force' approaches that mitigate mental health stigma and address structural barriers to partner employment to ensure long-term recruitment and retention.
-
335.
This report describes eight frontier large language model (LLM) agents on their ability to design DNA segments, interact with a benchtop DNA synthesizer, and generate laboratory protocols. These are dual-use tasks, explored as potential technical bottlenecks to a malicious actor building a viral pathogen that could be weaponized. Performance varied among the models, but all tested LLMs designed biologically coherent DNA segments in some attempts.
-
336.
The article argues that the U.S. has a historic opportunity to fundamentally reshape the standoff with Iran, particularly if Donald Trump returns to office. This leverage is based on Iran's current vulnerabilities, including an economy suffering from sanctions and mismanagement, and a significantly weakened regional proxy network following recent conflicts. Coupled with mounting public resentment within the Islamic Republic, Washington is positioned to exert considerable influence. Strategically, the U.S. should capitalize on these weaknesses to achieve a profound transformation in the geopolitical relationship with Tehran.
-
337.
Xi Jinping has launched a sweeping purge targeting the highest echelons of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) leadership. The investigation of top officers for "violations of party discipline" signals a profound political restructuring, far exceeding routine anti-corruption efforts. This move centralizes ultimate authority within the PLA directly under Xi's personal control, eliminating potential institutional resistance among the military elite. Strategically, this consolidation of power solidifies Xi's grip on the state apparatus and fundamentally reshapes China's internal power dynamics and military command structure.
-
338.
The analysis identifies the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan as the most critical flashpoint in South Asia, surpassing the immediate threat posed by India-Pakistan tensions. Pakistan accuses the Taliban regime of harboring militant groups, particularly the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which continues to launch cross-border attacks. This persistent, simmering conflict threatens regional stability and has damaging consequences for the wider area. Policymakers must address this cross-border security issue, as the failure to stabilize the Afghan-Pakistani relationship risks escalating regional violence.
-
339.
The article highlights the persistent and escalating threat posed by Beijing, citing a 2021 warning that China aims to control Taiwan by 2027. This prediction, known as the 'Davidson Window,' prompted a significant strategic response from the United States. Consequently, Congress authorized $7.1 billion for the Pacific Deterrence Initiative, signaling a major increase in U.S. military commitment to the region. The findings imply that the geopolitical tension surrounding Taiwan requires sustained, high-level defense and strategic investment from key international partners.
-
340.
The analysis concludes that the Islamic Republic of Iran is a 'zombie regime' whose ideological and economic foundations are failing, making the current status quo unsustainable. The mounting, nationwide protests are fueled by deep political, economic, and social grievances that transcend traditional ethnic or class divides. Crucially, the regime's core anti-Western ideology is losing legitimacy as the population increasingly prioritizes national reclamation and stability over foreign-directed conflict. Policymakers should anticipate that while the regime may use violence to delay its collapse, the underlying grievances will persist, suggesting a profound and complex transition away from the current theocratic structure.
-
341.
The article argues that the framing of AI development as a zero-sum 'race' is misleading, challenging the premise that global AI dominance will yield a single victor. Key evidence suggests that the world's two leading AI powers, the United States and China, are not converging on the same technological or strategic path. Policymakers should therefore abandon the 'race' mentality and instead focus on understanding the divergent development trajectories of major powers. This shift implies that strategic planning must account for distinct, non-parallel AI advancements rather than anticipating a single global finish line.
-
342.
Artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming integral to national security, with militaries already deploying AI models to analyze satellite imagery and assess adversary capabilities for force recommendations. While AI promises to reshape state responses to threats, the article warns that its advanced integration threatens to undermine traditional deterrence theory. Effective deterrence relies on a state's credible willingness and ability to inflict unacceptable harm, and AI's influence on decision cycles complicates this foundational concept. Policymakers must therefore address how these powerful AI systems impact strategic stability and the credibility of military threats.
-
343.
The article argues that the United States and China are uniquely positioned to forge a 'grand bargain' to stabilize the global order, shifting from ideological confrontation to productive coexistence. This opportunity is driven by the recognition that both nations benefit from a multipolar world and are deeply economically interdependent. To prevent a high-risk conflict, the policy strategy must pivot toward pragmatic cooperation, requiring the reform of the international system. Implementing this bargain necessitates establishing reciprocal agreements on trade, technology, and security to ensure peaceful power sharing and mutual benefit.
-
344.
The article argues that the risk of catastrophic miscalculation, which has historically plagued nuclear deterrence, remains critically high in the modern information environment. It uses the 1983 Soviet early warning system incident as a key historical precedent, demonstrating how a false alarm could have triggered a devastating counterattack. The core finding is that the proliferation of deepfakes and sophisticated disinformation threatens to create false signals of intent, mimicking past warning failures. Therefore, policymakers must urgently develop robust verification protocols and strategic guardrails to prevent fabricated information from escalating into geopolitical or military crises.
-
345.
The U.S. Navy is restructuring its acquisition process by establishing a dedicated Portfolio Acquisition Executive for Robotics and Autonomous Systems (PAE RAS). This initiative places Rebecca Gassler, a key figure from Project Overmatch, in charge of overseeing nearly 50 unmanned and autonomous programs, including the Orca UUV and MASC. This consolidation aims to build transparency and speed in delivery, addressing the Pentagon's mandate to rapidly field advanced drone technology. Strategically, the PAE RAS effort is designed to expand naval power, increase operational persistence, and provide integrated autonomous capabilities to degrade adversary tempo.