The article outlines how a successful modern foreign policy career requires blending traditional diplomatic expertise with private sector acumen. Juster's career trajectory—from international law to high-stakes diplomacy (e.g., the Gulf War) and subsequently to the technology sector—demonstrates this synthesis. Key evidence includes his work managing complex negotiations under duress and his involvement in co-founding the U.S.-India High Technology Group. The implication for policy is that effective geopolitical strategy must actively integrate private sector knowledge and technological considerations to manage modern economic and security challenges.
What will 2026 bring for US migration policy?
English Summary
The article argues that current U.S. immigration policies focused solely on deterrence are causing significant economic damage, including negative net migration and a $50 billion reduction in consumer spending. It highlights how aggressive enforcement and the closure of legal pathways have resulted in severe labor shortages across agriculture, engineering, and healthcare sectors. Brookings suggests that a balanced approach—combining credible enforcement with expanded lawful pathways and regional diplomacy—is necessary to manage migration sustainably. The analysis concludes that 2026 requires a shift toward modernizing the visa system and reforming asylum processes to ensure long-term economic stability and border order.
中文摘要
本文主張，目前美國僅採取威懾手段的移民政策正造成重大的經濟損失，包括淨遷移人口負成長，以及消費者支出減少達 500 億美元。報告強調，激進的執法措施與合法入境管道的關閉，已導致農業、工程和醫療照護產業面臨嚴峻的勞動力短缺。布魯金斯學會（Brookings）建議應採取平衡策略，將具公信力的執法與擴大合法管道及區域外交相結合，方能實現永續的移民管理。分析結論指出，2026 年必須轉向推動簽證制度現代化並改革庇護程序，以確保長期經濟穩定與邊境秩序。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Brookings report argues that closing long-term fiscal deficits cannot be achieved solely by taxing high earners or corporations. Analysis shows that the required savings necessitate broad-based tax increases that would significantly impact middle and lower-income families, as targeted taxes on the wealthy are insufficient. The report notes that high-tax OECD nations achieve high revenues through broad consumption taxes (like VAT) rather than exclusively through highly progressive taxes on the rich. Consequently, any major tax-funded deficit solution would impose a substantial burden on the working class, potentially without the comprehensive social benefits enjoyed by European counterparts.
-
3.
The analysis concludes that China will hold the upper hand at the upcoming Trump-Xi summit, leveraging its dominance over critical minerals, rare earths, and magnet supply chains. This geopolitical leverage, combined with global instability (such as the Iran conflict), allows Beijing to dictate terms and buy time to consolidate its technological and industrial self-sufficiency. Strategically, the U.S. must avoid granting China a managed equilibrium by maintaining 'maximum pressure' on key sectors like AI and tech, rather than seeking broad agreements that could undermine American leadership.
-
4.
The article argues that the ongoing Iran War has triggered a severe global hunger crisis, exacerbated by U.S. aid cuts and policy neglect, pushing millions to the brink of starvation. Key evidence includes the termination of U.S. support in countries like Afghanistan, Somalia, and Yemen, coupled with supply chain disruptions and massive cost increases across the region. Policy recommendations are urgent: the U.S. must immediately deploy its $5.4 billion in unspent humanitarian funds, establish a humanitarian corridor through the Strait of Hormuz, and reinstate life-saving aid to critical nations.
-
5.
The analysis cautions that the upcoming Trump-Xi summit must not result in short-term strategic concessions for the US, which risks undermining long-term stability. China is rapidly consolidating global power, leveraging US policy shifts and increasing its assertiveness across the Indo-Pacific and in technology. Strategically, the US must prioritize addressing the immediate crisis in Iran, where China holds significant leverage, and must also focus on joint cooperation on AI. Ultimately, the US must resist political impulses and pursue a robust strategy to counter China's growing challenge to global dominance.