The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
Nuclear Arms Control
English Summary
CFR’s February 22, 2026, nuclear arms control coverage argues that nonproliferation and arms control remain central to managing great-power rivalry and regional nuclear risks. The evidence is the breadth of its featured analyses and backgrounders—spanning the Iran nuclear deal, sanctions on North Korea, and emerging domains such as outer space—plus contributions from multiple senior experts and task-force work. The overall reasoning is that existing regimes still matter but are under pressure from geopolitical competition, enforcement gaps, and technological change. Policy-wise, the implication is to pair deterrence with renewed diplomacy: strengthen treaty frameworks, tighten coordinated sanctions and verification, and update rules for new strategic domains before instability worsens.
中文摘要
CFR於2026年2月22日發布的核武軍備控制相關內容主張，不擴散與軍備控制在管理大國競爭與區域核風險方面仍居核心地位。其依據在於所刊載分析與背景資料的廣度，涵蓋伊朗核協議、對北韓制裁，以及外太空等新興領域，並納入多位資深專家與專案工作小組的研究成果。整體論證指出，現有機制仍具重要性，但正受到地緣政治競爭、執行落差與科技變遷的壓力。就政策意涵而言，應將嚇阻與重啟外交並行：強化條約架構、收緊協調一致的制裁與查核，並在局勢惡化前更新新戰略領域的規則。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.