The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
The Real Thucydides Trap
English Summary
The article posits that the escalating rivalry between the United States and China mirrors the historical 'Thucydides Trap,' suggesting that the relationship is inherently prone to conflict as a rising power challenges an established order. The analysis synthesizes geopolitical concerns, tracking China's growing military and economic capabilities against the backdrop of deep, yet contradictory, interdependence. For policymakers, the implication is that simply viewing the rivalry through a lens of confrontation is insufficient; instead, strategies must incorporate historical insights to manage the structural tensions and mitigate the risk of miscalculation. This requires balancing competition with mechanisms for stable, long-term coexistence.
中文摘要
本文提出，美國與中國日益升級的競爭，呼應了歷史上的「修昔底德陷阱」，暗示著由於一個崛起的大國挑戰既有秩序，雙方關係本質上就容易走向衝突。該分析綜合了地緣政治考量，在深層但又充滿矛盾的相互依賴性背景下，追蹤了中國不斷增長的軍事和經濟實力。對於政策制定者而言，其啟示是，僅從對抗的角度看待這場競爭是不足夠的；相反，策略必須納入歷史洞察，以管理結構性張力並減輕誤判的風險。這要求在競爭與建立穩定、長期的共存機制之間取得平衡。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.