The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
Strange Stability: How Cold War Scientists Set Out to Control the Arms Race and Ended Up Serving the Military-Industrial Complex
English Summary
The analysis examines how Cold War scientists reframed nuclear policy, arguing that the goal was not disarmament, but rather stabilizing the arms race through controlled deterrence. While these thinkers provided valuable intellectual frameworks for policymakers, their actual influence on nuclear decision-making was less pronounced than commonly believed. The core finding is that the concept of 'stability' allowed analysts to organize thought, even if they were skeptical of total disarmament. For policy, this suggests that understanding the political dynamics that sideline scientific input is crucial for developing modern arms control strategies and managing great power competition.
中文摘要
本分析探討了冷戰科學家如何重新定義核政策，其論點認為其目的並非實現裁軍，而是透過受控威懾來穩定軍備競賽。儘管這些思想家為政策制定者提供了寶貴的知識框架，但他們在核決策過程中的實際影響力，不如一般普遍認為的那麼顯著。核心發現指出，「穩定性」這一概念使分析師能夠組織思維，即使他們對徹底的裁軍持懷疑態度。對於政策制定而言，這表明了解那些將科學輸入排除在外的政治動態，對於發展現代軍備控制戰略和管理大國競爭至關重要。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
3.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.
-
4.U.S. Navy Orders Low-cost Missiles to Expand Fleet, Allied Long-Range Maritime Strike Capabilities (USNI)
The U.S. Navy is prioritizing the procurement of low-cost, long-range cruise missiles through programs like CHAOS and CAMS to significantly expand strike capabilities for both its own fleet and allied partners. This strategic shift provides affordable precision munitions capable of striking targets up to 1,000 nautical miles, addressing critical stockpiles depleted by recent conflicts. By developing these systems, the U.S. aims to overcome procurement delays faced by allies (such as Japan and Taiwan) who rely on older missile designs. Ultimately, this initiative strengthens allied deterrence and bolsters long-range maritime strike capabilities necessary for potential conflict with China.
-
5.
The analysis highlights that despite temporary ceasefires, the prospect of a durable resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains highly remote due to political fragmentation and continued instability in Gaza and the West Bank. Key reasoning emphasizes that achieving statehood requires practical steps, including rebuilding effective governance structures and fostering Palestinian unity, rather than relying solely on external diplomatic intervention. For policy makers, this suggests that immediate strategic focus must shift toward stabilizing local conditions and supporting viable governance models in Gaza to build a foundation for future political progress.