The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
Members' question time: What next for Hungary?
English Summary
Chatham House frames Hungary’s 12 April 2026 election as a pivotal contest for both Hungary and the EU, with the potential to alter Europe’s political trajectory. The core argument is that Viktor Orbán’s long rule—marked by hardline migration policy, weakened judicial independence, and closer ties with Russia—has created sustained conflict with Brussels and concerns about democratic backsliding. The event highlights Péter Magyar and the TISZA movement as Orbán’s strongest challenger in years, citing polling that suggests a plausible upset and a pro-EU, centrist alternative. Strategically, the outcome could either reinforce Hungary’s current sovereigntist path or trigger a policy reset toward EU alignment, with spillover effects on the momentum of right-leaning populist forces across Europe.
中文摘要
查塔姆研究所將匈牙利2026年4月12日選舉定位為對匈牙利與歐盟皆具關鍵意義的對決，可能改變歐洲政治走向。其核心論點指出，維克多・奧班（Viktor Orbán）長期執政期間所推動的強硬移民政策、司法獨立性削弱，以及與俄羅斯更緊密的關係，已造成與布魯塞爾的持續衝突，並引發民主倒退疑慮。該活動並強調彼得・馬扎爾（Péter Magyar）及TISZA運動是奧班多年來最具實力的挑戰者，援引民調顯示存在爆冷可能，且其提供親歐盟、中間路線的替代方案。從戰略層面看，選舉結果可能鞏固匈牙利當前的主權優先路線，或觸發朝向與歐盟一致的政策重置，並對歐洲各地右傾民粹勢力的動能產生外溢效應。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
3.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.
-
4.
The author argues that the new 'Section 301' tariffs, ostensibly targeting forced labor, are not a genuine human rights measure but rather an attempt to re-establish a broad, punitive tariff wall. Key evidence supporting this claim includes the rushed nature of the investigation (98 pages for 60 economies), the lack of specific economic harm analysis, and the imposition of disproportionately high tariffs that far exceed any proportional response. Strategically, the use of human rights language to generate revenue sets a dangerous precedent, potentially allowing future administrations to bypass legislative processes and misuse trade law. The article concludes by urging Congress to reform these laws before they cause further damage to international trade frameworks.
-
5.
Escalating tensions between Iran and the U.S., coupled with renewed Houthi blockades in the Red Sea, have severely disrupted critical shipping chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz. Key evidence includes sharply reduced transit numbers and repeated attacks by Iranian-linked vessels off Oman's coast, while the Houthis enforce a maritime embargo on Saudi-linked ships. Strategically, this instability threatens global energy markets, forcing major powers to weigh their import needs. The continued volatility suggests that both Iran and the U.S. are willing to absorb significant economic pain to gain geopolitical leverage over regional stability.