The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
How can West Africa strengthen its collective security against violent extremism?
English Summary
The event’s core argument is that violent extremism in West Africa cannot be contained by national responses because insecurity from the Lake Chad Basin to western Mali is fundamentally cross-border. Speakers point to the erosion of regional mechanisms after coups in the central Sahel, with stalled cooperation on hot pursuit, joint operations, intelligence sharing, and disruption of illicit finance, while Mali’s fuel blockade illustrates hard economic-security interdependence for landlocked states. The discussion suggests that parallel security blocs alone will be insufficient unless trust is rebuilt between Sahel and coastal states through practical bilateral and regional arrangements. Policy priorities therefore include restoring interoperable regional frameworks, creating confidence-building mechanisms among governments, and pairing military coordination with strategies that address underlying political and socio-economic drivers of insecurity.
中文摘要
該活動的核心論點是：西非的暴力極端主義無法透過各國單邊回應加以遏止，因為從乍得湖流域到馬利西部的不安全情勢在本質上具有跨境性。與會者指出，在中薩赫勒地區政變後，區域機制逐步弱化，導致越境追剿、聯合行動、情報共享與打擊非法資金流的合作停滯；同時，馬利燃料封鎖一事也凸顯內陸國家在經濟與安全上的高度相互依存。討論認為，僅建立平行安全集團仍不足以應對挑戰，除非透過務實的雙邊與區域安排，重建薩赫勒國家與沿海國家之間的互信。因此，政策重點應包括：恢復可互通運作的區域框架、建立政府間的信任建立機制，並在軍事協調之外，配套處理不安全根源之政治與社會經濟驅動因素的策略。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.