The ongoing Ebola outbreak in the DRC serves as a critical warning that the global health security system is fundamentally unprepared for future biological threats. The difficulty in containing this outbreak is compounded by the rising risk of emerging pathogens and the growing potential for AI misuse in bioweapon development. Policy must therefore shift from reactive, crisis-driven funding to sustained, proactive investment in resilient public health infrastructure, particularly in conflict zones. Addressing this requires strengthening global surveillance, ensuring consistent international cooperation, and mitigating the intersection of conflict, climate change, and disease spread.
Great Power Diplomacy: The Skill of Statecraft From Attila the Hun to Kissinger
English Summary
The article posits that in the current era of great-power competition, diplomacy must be understood not merely as communication, but as a sophisticated exercise in grand strategy. Historically, successful statecraft—as demonstrated by figures from Bismarck to the Byzantines—requires leaders to build complex alliances and coalitions to offset limited national capabilities. This strategic process involves restricting the operational space of adversaries while integrating diplomatic goals with both military and economic power. Consequently, the analysis stresses that mastering this comprehensive art of statecraft is increasingly vital for managing threats and maintaining stability in a fractured global order.
中文摘要
本文提出，在當前大國競爭的時代，外交不能僅被視為溝通，而必須被理解為一門複雜的「大戰略」實踐。從歷史角度來看，成功的治國方略——無論是拜斯馬克還是拜占庭帝國的典範——都要求領導人建立複雜的聯盟與集團，以彌補國家能力上的局限性。這一戰略過程涉及限制敵對方的行動空間，並將外交目標與軍事及經濟力量相整合。因此，本文分析強調，掌握這門全面的治國藝術，對於管理當前的威脅並維持碎片化的全球秩序穩定性，正變得越來越關鍵。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.
-
3.
Congress has significantly expanded presidential tariff authority by passing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, allowing the executive to impose up to 100% tariffs on key buyers of Russian energy and sanctions enablers. The article argues that this legislation represents a dangerous abdication of Congress's Article I authority, as it grants the executive vast, discretionary power without specifying criteria for enforcement. Historically, the executive could claim tariffs were its own doing; however, by writing and passing this new authority, Congress now owns the resulting trade policy and its economic consequences. This shift implies that future tariffs will be viewed by the public as a direct legislative action, potentially undermining the administration's credibility and creating political vulnerability.
-
4.
Cuba is on a trajectory toward an accelerating state and economic collapse, risking a point of no return. The state is deteriorating into "authoritarian anarchy," retaining its capacity for political repression but losing the ability to provide basic public services like health and safety. Economically, while the private sector is growing, this expansion is highly unequal, fueling cronyism and widening class gaps between the elite and the poor. If the current trend continues, the country risks calcifying these defects into a dysfunctional baseline, severely diminishing the chances of a stable, democratic transition.
-
5.
The article analyzes Finland's agreement to coordinate its conventional forces with French nuclear capabilities, clarifying that no nuclear weapons will be stationed in Finland. The author argues that increased communication between nuclear powers, rather than the deployment of weapons, is beneficial for reducing the risk of miscalculation and inadvertent escalation, particularly near Russia. For Europe, the policy recommendation is a responsible middle course: strengthening non-nuclear military capabilities to deter Russia while simultaneously negotiating a stable system, such as non-aligned buffer states. This approach is presented as a diplomatic alternative to both aggressive military action and surrender.