Congress has significantly expanded presidential tariff authority by passing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, allowing the executive to impose up to 100% tariffs on key buyers of Russian energy and sanctions enablers. The article argues that this legislation represents a dangerous abdication of Congress's Article I authority, as it grants the executive vast, discretionary power without specifying criteria for enforcement. Historically, the executive could claim tariffs were its own doing; however, by writing and passing this new authority, Congress now owns the resulting trade policy and its economic consequences. This shift implies that future tariffs will be viewed by the public as a direct legislative action, potentially undermining the administration's credibility and creating political vulnerability.
Tracking the labor market and jobs
English Summary
Brookings has released an updated interactive tool, "Tracking the labor market and jobs," designed to provide detailed monthly monitoring of the U.S. workforce through various demographic lenses. The tool utilizes Current Population Survey microdata to offer granular insights into labor force participation, employment-population ratios, and nuanced unemployment metrics like the U-5 rate. By allowing cross-tabulation of factors such as nativity, education, and parental status, it highlights specific disparities and trends that headline economic figures often obscure. This capability is essential for policymakers to design evidence-based interventions that address the unique challenges faced by different segments of the labor market.
中文摘要
布魯金斯學會發布了更新後的互動式工具「追蹤勞動力市場與就業」，旨在透過多個人口統計視角對美國勞動力進行詳細的每月監測。該工具利用《當前人口調查》（CPS）的微觀數據，針對勞動力參與率、就業人口比以及如 U-5 失業率等細緻的失業指標提供深入見解。透過對出生地、教育程度和家長身分等因素進行交叉分析，該工具揭示了主要經濟數據往往掩蓋的特定差異與趨勢。這項功能對於決策者設計循證干預措施以應對勞動力市場不同群體所面臨的獨特挑戰至關重要。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
Cuba is on a trajectory toward an accelerating state and economic collapse, risking a point of no return. The state is deteriorating into "authoritarian anarchy," retaining its capacity for political repression but losing the ability to provide basic public services like health and safety. Economically, while the private sector is growing, this expansion is highly unequal, fueling cronyism and widening class gaps between the elite and the poor. If the current trend continues, the country risks calcifying these defects into a dysfunctional baseline, severely diminishing the chances of a stable, democratic transition.
-
3.
The article argues that China's ongoing purges are not signs of weakness, but rather a sophisticated, historically rooted process of 'rectification' that strengthens the CCP's grip on power. This mechanism requires cadres to submit mandatory self-criticisms and build permanent, detailed personnel files (dossiers). This system of record-keeping is the CCP's primary source of resilience, creating profound, internalized discipline that controls internal dissent. Policymakers must recognize that the regime's durability stems from this deep internal control mechanism, making succession—rather than internal purges—the ultimate strategic vulnerability.
-
4.
The analysis argues that contemporary warfare is marked by a return to great power competition, often fueled by strategic hubris and historical overconfidence. A key failure across modern conflicts is the 'short-war fallacy'—the assumption that overwhelming military force guarantees a quick, decisive victory. This mindset blinds policymakers to the need for sustained resource mobilization and complex political outcomes. Consequently, effective strategy requires linking military objectives with clear, comprehensive political goals, rather than pursuing rapid, decisive regime changes or military victories in isolation.
-
5.
The report argues that the rapid integration of AI creates novel and complex risks—such as deepfakes, misinformation, and intellectual property disputes—that do not fit within existing insurance lines, challenging the technology's overall insurability. Evidence shows that while lawsuits center on IP, the scope of harm is expanding into privacy and product liability, and insurers are responding unevenly with a mix of exclusions and limited coverage. Policymakers must therefore focus on managing systemic, correlated AI risks, including shared model dependencies and universal attacks, to prevent market failure and guide necessary regulatory oversight.