The article outlines how a successful modern foreign policy career requires blending traditional diplomatic expertise with private sector acumen. Juster's career trajectory—from international law to high-stakes diplomacy (e.g., the Gulf War) and subsequently to the technology sector—demonstrates this synthesis. Key evidence includes his work managing complex negotiations under duress and his involvement in co-founding the U.S.-India High Technology Group. The implication for policy is that effective geopolitical strategy must actively integrate private sector knowledge and technological considerations to manage modern economic and security challenges.
UK in the World Programme
English Summary
Chatham House’s UK in the World Programme argues that the UK must rethink foreign policy for a more multipolar and less predictable environment, as its traditional relationships with the US and Europe evolve and new actors gain influence. It reasons that the UK can still act effectively as an influential mid-sized power and global broker, but only if external strategy is linked to domestic renewal on growth, regional inequality, and public service capacity. The programme supports this through expert working groups, policy analysis on trade-offs, and public engagement focused on economic security, development, strategic partnerships, and science and technology. The strategic implication is that UK policymakers should pursue a more integrated domestic-foreign policy approach, prioritizing resilient partnerships, economic security, and innovation-led statecraft.
中文摘要
查塔姆研究所（Chatham House）「英國與世界」計畫主張，隨著英國與美國及歐洲的傳統關係持續演變、且新興行為體影響力上升，英國必須在更趨多極且更難預測的環境中重新思考其外交政策。該計畫認為，英國仍可有效扮演具影響力的中等強權與全球協調者角色，但前提是必須將對外戰略與國內更新相連結，聚焦於經濟成長、區域不平等與公共服務能力。為此，計畫透過專家工作小組、針對政策取捨的分析，以及以經濟安全、發展、戰略夥伴關係與科學技術為重點的公共參與來提供支援。其戰略意涵在於，英國決策者應採取更整合的內外政策路徑，優先強化具韌性的夥伴關係、經濟安全與以創新驅動的治國能力。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The analysis suggests that Russia's ability to sustain its war effort in Ukraine is facing increasing internal and external pressures. Key evidence points to a tightening economic crisis, evidenced by widespread blackouts and a noticeable scaling back of traditional military displays. Furthermore, the discussion highlights Putin's increasing isolation and micromanagement, suggesting that the strategic initiative may be slipping out of Moscow's control. Policymakers should monitor these signs of internal strain, as they indicate potential vulnerabilities and a possible shift in Russia's military and geopolitical calculus.
-
3.
The Brookings report argues that closing long-term fiscal deficits cannot be achieved solely by taxing high earners or corporations. Analysis shows that the required savings necessitate broad-based tax increases that would significantly impact middle and lower-income families, as targeted taxes on the wealthy are insufficient. The report notes that high-tax OECD nations achieve high revenues through broad consumption taxes (like VAT) rather than exclusively through highly progressive taxes on the rich. Consequently, any major tax-funded deficit solution would impose a substantial burden on the working class, potentially without the comprehensive social benefits enjoyed by European counterparts.
-
4.
The analysis concludes that China will hold the upper hand at the upcoming Trump-Xi summit, leveraging its dominance over critical minerals, rare earths, and magnet supply chains. This geopolitical leverage, combined with global instability (such as the Iran conflict), allows Beijing to dictate terms and buy time to consolidate its technological and industrial self-sufficiency. Strategically, the U.S. must avoid granting China a managed equilibrium by maintaining 'maximum pressure' on key sectors like AI and tech, rather than seeking broad agreements that could undermine American leadership.
-
5.
The article argues that the ongoing Iran War has triggered a severe global hunger crisis, exacerbated by U.S. aid cuts and policy neglect, pushing millions to the brink of starvation. Key evidence includes the termination of U.S. support in countries like Afghanistan, Somalia, and Yemen, coupled with supply chain disruptions and massive cost increases across the region. Policy recommendations are urgent: the U.S. must immediately deploy its $5.4 billion in unspent humanitarian funds, establish a humanitarian corridor through the Strait of Hormuz, and reinstate life-saving aid to critical nations.