The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.
The reopening of the Rafah crossing provides some hope for Palestinians, but can it be sustained?
English Summary
Chatham House argues that reopening Rafah is a meaningful but fragile breakthrough: it restores a limited non-Israeli outlet for Gazans, yet remains vulnerable to political, security, and operational reversal. Evidence cited includes very low initial crossing numbers, Israeli pre-clearance and vetting rules, reported harassment, and historical patterns in which security incidents, monitoring bottlenecks, and factional competition repeatedly led to closure or violence. The paper also notes Israeli domestic electoral pressures, far-right opposition, and concerns over smuggling, all of which could undermine implementation of the wider October 2025 ceasefire framework and Gaza reconstruction plans. Strategically, the implication is that external actors should prioritize robust monitoring, transparent crossing governance, and sustained diplomatic pressure to prevent backsliding, while recognizing that continued closure would deepen despair and likely fuel renewed instability.
中文摘要
查塔姆研究所（Chatham House）認為，重啟拉法口岸是一項具意義但脆弱的突破：它為加薩民眾恢復了一條有限、非以色列的對外通道，但仍易因政治、安全與運作因素而逆轉。文中證據包括：初期通行人數極低、以色列的事前核准與審查規定、據報發生的騷擾，以及歷史上安全事件、監測瓶頸與派系競爭一再導致口岸關閉或暴力升高的模式。報告亦指出，以色列國內選舉壓力、極右翼反對與對走私的憂慮，都可能削弱更廣泛的2025年10月停火框架與加薩重建計畫的落實。從戰略上看，其意涵是外部行動方應優先投入強健監測、透明的口岸治理與持續外交施壓，以防止情勢倒退；同時必須認知，若口岸持續關閉，將加深絕望，並很可能助長新一輪不穩定。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
Congress has significantly expanded presidential tariff authority by passing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, allowing the executive to impose up to 100% tariffs on key buyers of Russian energy and sanctions enablers. The article argues that this legislation represents a dangerous abdication of Congress's Article I authority, as it grants the executive vast, discretionary power without specifying criteria for enforcement. Historically, the executive could claim tariffs were its own doing; however, by writing and passing this new authority, Congress now owns the resulting trade policy and its economic consequences. This shift implies that future tariffs will be viewed by the public as a direct legislative action, potentially undermining the administration's credibility and creating political vulnerability.
-
3.
Cuba is on a trajectory toward an accelerating state and economic collapse, risking a point of no return. The state is deteriorating into "authoritarian anarchy," retaining its capacity for political repression but losing the ability to provide basic public services like health and safety. Economically, while the private sector is growing, this expansion is highly unequal, fueling cronyism and widening class gaps between the elite and the poor. If the current trend continues, the country risks calcifying these defects into a dysfunctional baseline, severely diminishing the chances of a stable, democratic transition.
-
4.
The article analyzes Finland's agreement to coordinate its conventional forces with French nuclear capabilities, clarifying that no nuclear weapons will be stationed in Finland. The author argues that increased communication between nuclear powers, rather than the deployment of weapons, is beneficial for reducing the risk of miscalculation and inadvertent escalation, particularly near Russia. For Europe, the policy recommendation is a responsible middle course: strengthening non-nuclear military capabilities to deter Russia while simultaneously negotiating a stable system, such as non-aligned buffer states. This approach is presented as a diplomatic alternative to both aggressive military action and surrender.
-
5.
The article argues that China's ongoing purges are not signs of weakness, but rather a sophisticated, historically rooted process of 'rectification' that strengthens the CCP's grip on power. This mechanism requires cadres to submit mandatory self-criticisms and build permanent, detailed personnel files (dossiers). This system of record-keeping is the CCP's primary source of resilience, creating profound, internalized discipline that controls internal dissent. Policymakers must recognize that the regime's durability stems from this deep internal control mechanism, making succession—rather than internal purges—the ultimate strategic vulnerability.