The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
The Age of Kleptocracy
English Summary
The analysis of modern global power dynamics reveals significant difficulty in characterizing the foreign policy of key actors, such as Donald Trump, challenging traditional frameworks like liberal internationalism or pure realism. Initial interpretations often relied on the concept of 'great-power competition' to rationalize maneuvers, but recent evidence suggests a shift toward great powers colluding to carve up the world into distinct spheres of influence. This ambiguity signals a move away from predictable, rules-based order toward a more fragmented and unpredictable geopolitical landscape. Policymakers must therefore adjust strategies to account for this non-traditional, great-power competition and the resulting instability in global governance.
中文摘要
對現代全球權力動態的分析顯示，難以準確界定主要行為者（例如唐納德·川普）的外交政策，這挑戰了自由國際主義或純粹現實主義等傳統框架。最初的解讀常依賴「大國競爭」的概念來合理化各方行動，但近期的證據顯示，局勢正轉向大國串聯，意圖將世界劃分為各自的勢力範圍。這種模糊性標誌著全球秩序正從可預測的、基於規則的體系，轉向一個更碎片化、更不可預測的地緣政治格局。因此，政策制定者必須調整策略，以應對這種非傳統的大國競爭及其導致的全球治理不穩定性。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.