The article argues that the Federal Reserve's recent rate hike decision, while justifiable on inflation grounds, highlights a critical lack of an underlying, transparent policy framework. The core problem is that the Fed's decisions appear discretionary, leading to market uncertainty because the committee's judgment, rather than clear data, dictates policy shifts. The author proposes that the Fed adopt a formal monetary policy rule—an algebraic formula linking the target rate to indicators like inflation and unemployment—to replace subjective guidance. Implementing such a rule would provide market predictability, enhance transparency, and shield the Fed from political attacks by making deviations from the standard easily quantifiable.
Africa Programme
English Summary
Chatham House’s Africa Programme argues that independent, politically focused analysis of individual African states is essential for better international decision-making and conflict prevention. It supports this claim by emphasizing its convening role with senior officials and experts, its non-commercial independence from political-risk consultancies, and its work to improve the quality of information used by policymakers and investors. The programme also links long-term investment success to transparency, accountability, and rule of law, while encouraging non-confrontational reform by governments and businesses. Strategically, the message is that governments and corporations should back nuanced country-level political analysis and governance-focused engagement to manage risk, support stability, and capture future growth opportunities as African states gain global influence.
中文摘要
查塔姆研究所（Chatham House）非洲計畫主張，若要改善國際決策並預防衝突，關鍵在於對個別非洲國家進行獨立且聚焦政治面的分析。該計畫以其與高階官員及專家召集對話的平台角色、其有別於政治風險顧問公司的非商業性獨立立場，以及其提升決策者與投資人所用資訊品質的工作，來支持此一論點。該計畫亦指出，長期投資成功與透明度、問責機制及法治密切相關，並鼓勵政府與企業以非對抗方式推動改革。其策略訊息是：隨著非洲國家全球影響力上升，各國政府與企業應支持更細緻的國別政治分析與以治理為核心的互動，以管理風險、促進穩定並把握未來成長機會。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The ongoing Ebola outbreak in the DRC serves as a critical warning that the global health security system is fundamentally unprepared for future biological threats. The difficulty in containing this outbreak is compounded by the rising risk of emerging pathogens and the growing potential for AI misuse in bioweapon development. Policy must therefore shift from reactive, crisis-driven funding to sustained, proactive investment in resilient public health infrastructure, particularly in conflict zones. Addressing this requires strengthening global surveillance, ensuring consistent international cooperation, and mitigating the intersection of conflict, climate change, and disease spread.
-
3.A Design Lab Pilot to Inform Strategies for Expanding Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Community Mental Health Centers (RAND)
Despite MOUD being the standard of care for opioid use disorder, access remains severely limited in Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs), which serve the primary population with co-occurring disorders. A Design Lab pilot identified payment limitations and regulatory complexity as the chief barriers to implementation. The most feasible and high-impact strategy identified was establishing a structured learning exchange between CMHC leaders and insurers to improve reimbursement understanding. Policymakers and payers are therefore advised to pilot this learning exchange model to initiate broader payment reform and expand evidence-based care for this vulnerable population.
-
4.
The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.
-
5.
Congress has significantly expanded presidential tariff authority by passing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, allowing the executive to impose up to 100% tariffs on key buyers of Russian energy and sanctions enablers. The article argues that this legislation represents a dangerous abdication of Congress's Article I authority, as it grants the executive vast, discretionary power without specifying criteria for enforcement. Historically, the executive could claim tariffs were its own doing; however, by writing and passing this new authority, Congress now owns the resulting trade policy and its economic consequences. This shift implies that future tariffs will be viewed by the public as a direct legislative action, potentially undermining the administration's credibility and creating political vulnerability.