ThinkTankWeekly

America and Israel Have Different Endgames in Iran

Foreign Affairs | 2026-04-08 | middle_east

Topics: Middle East, United States

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

The article argues that the United States and Israel possess fundamentally different strategic objectives, or 'endgames,' regarding Iran, leading to strategic incoherence in their joint campaign. While the US effort lacks a singular, coherent goal, Israel views direct confrontation with the Islamic Republic as a long-standing, deeply studied necessity. This divergence suggests that the two partners are pursuing separate interests, complicating any unified policy approach. Policymakers must recognize this inherent difference in national goals to predict future actions and formulate effective strategies in the region.

中文摘要

本文指出,美國和以色列在處理伊朗問題上,擁有根本不同且各自獨立的戰略終局目標,這導致了其聯合行動出現戰略不連貫性。美國的努力缺乏一個單一、連貫的目標,而以色列則將與伊斯蘭共和國的直接對抗視為一個長期研究、深層認可的必要性。這種分歧表明兩方夥伴正在追求各自的利益,使得任何統一的政策方法都變得複雜。政策制定者必須認識到國家目標中這種內在差異,才能預測未來的行動,並為該地區制定出有效的策略。

Related Entries

  1. 1.

    The article outlines how a successful modern foreign policy career requires blending traditional diplomatic expertise with private sector acumen. Juster's career trajectory—from international law to high-stakes diplomacy (e.g., the Gulf War) and subsequently to the technology sector—demonstrates this synthesis. Key evidence includes his work managing complex negotiations under duress and his involvement in co-founding the U.S.-India High Technology Group. The implication for policy is that effective geopolitical strategy must actively integrate private sector knowledge and technological considerations to manage modern economic and security challenges.

    Read at CFR

  2. 2.
    2026-05-18 | europe | 2026-W20 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Russia, Ukraine

    The analysis suggests that Russia's ability to sustain its war effort in Ukraine is facing increasing internal and external pressures. Key evidence points to a tightening economic crisis, evidenced by widespread blackouts and a noticeable scaling back of traditional military displays. Furthermore, the discussion highlights Putin's increasing isolation and micromanagement, suggesting that the strategic initiative may be slipping out of Moscow's control. Policymakers should monitor these signs of internal strain, as they indicate potential vulnerabilities and a possible shift in Russia's military and geopolitical calculus.

    Read at Chatham House

  3. 3.
    2026-05-18 | economy | 2026-W20 | Topics: Europe, United States, Economy

    The Brookings report argues that closing long-term fiscal deficits cannot be achieved solely by taxing high earners or corporations. Analysis shows that the required savings necessitate broad-based tax increases that would significantly impact middle and lower-income families, as targeted taxes on the wealthy are insufficient. The report notes that high-tax OECD nations achieve high revenues through broad consumption taxes (like VAT) rather than exclusively through highly progressive taxes on the rich. Consequently, any major tax-funded deficit solution would impose a substantial burden on the working class, potentially without the comprehensive social benefits enjoyed by European counterparts.

    Read at Brookings

  4. 4.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The analysis concludes that China will hold the upper hand at the upcoming Trump-Xi summit, leveraging its dominance over critical minerals, rare earths, and magnet supply chains. This geopolitical leverage, combined with global instability (such as the Iran conflict), allows Beijing to dictate terms and buy time to consolidate its technological and industrial self-sufficiency. Strategically, the U.S. must avoid granting China a managed equilibrium by maintaining 'maximum pressure' on key sectors like AI and tech, rather than seeking broad agreements that could undermine American leadership.

    Read at CFR

  5. 5.
    2026-05-18 | middle_east | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the ongoing Iran War has triggered a severe global hunger crisis, exacerbated by U.S. aid cuts and policy neglect, pushing millions to the brink of starvation. Key evidence includes the termination of U.S. support in countries like Afghanistan, Somalia, and Yemen, coupled with supply chain disruptions and massive cost increases across the region. Policy recommendations are urgent: the U.S. must immediately deploy its $5.4 billion in unspent humanitarian funds, establish a humanitarian corridor through the Strait of Hormuz, and reinstate life-saving aid to critical nations.

    Read at CFR