The article argues that the Federal Reserve's recent rate hike decision, while justifiable on inflation grounds, highlights a critical lack of an underlying, transparent policy framework. The core problem is that the Fed's decisions appear discretionary, leading to market uncertainty because the committee's judgment, rather than clear data, dictates policy shifts. The author proposes that the Fed adopt a formal monetary policy rule—an algebraic formula linking the target rate to indicators like inflation and unemployment—to replace subjective guidance. Implementing such a rule would provide market predictability, enhance transparency, and shield the Fed from political attacks by making deviations from the standard easily quantifiable.
Jones Act Waiver Talk Highlights the Law’s Costs
English Summary
The article argues that the reported move to waive the Jones Act underscores how the 1920 law structurally inflates domestic transportation costs and restricts supply chain flexibility, particularly for energy and fertilizer. By limiting domestic shipping to a tiny, expensive fleet of US-built vessels, the act forces inefficient workarounds and increases reliance on foreign energy imports rather than domestic resources. The author contends that while a waiver would not single-handedly slash fuel prices, it would enhance competition and capacity in a stressed market. Ultimately, the frequent need to suspend the law during emergencies suggests that its permanent removal would better serve long-term economic and national security interests.
中文摘要
本文指出，有關豁免《瓊斯法案》(Jones Act) 的擬議舉措凸顯了這項 1920 年法律如何從結構上推高國內運輸成本，並限制供應鏈彈性，尤其是在能源與化肥領域。由於該法案將國內航運限制在規模極小且造價昂貴的美國造船隊，迫使業界採取低效率的變通做法，並增加對外國能源進口的依賴，而非利用國內資源。作者主張，雖然單次豁免無法憑一己之力大幅削減燃料價格，但能提升壓力沉重市場中的競爭與運力。最終，緊急情況下頻繁需要暫緩執行該法的現象顯示，永久廢除該法將更符合長期的經濟與國家安全利益。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The brief challenges current border policies that allow agents to search travelers' digital devices without a warrant, arguing this violates the Fourth Amendment. Cato contends that the existing 'border-search exception' is being misused to grant the government an overly broad, warrantless window into private digital lives. The core argument is that personal possession of data should not be treated as a vulnerability, while third-party cloud storage should not be treated as a refuge. If upheld, these policies transform routine border crossings into invasive investigative checkpoints, significantly eroding constitutional privacy rights.
-
3.
The ongoing Ebola outbreak in the DRC serves as a critical warning that the global health security system is fundamentally unprepared for future biological threats. The difficulty in containing this outbreak is compounded by the rising risk of emerging pathogens and the growing potential for AI misuse in bioweapon development. Policy must therefore shift from reactive, crisis-driven funding to sustained, proactive investment in resilient public health infrastructure, particularly in conflict zones. Addressing this requires strengthening global surveillance, ensuring consistent international cooperation, and mitigating the intersection of conflict, climate change, and disease spread.
-
4.A Design Lab Pilot to Inform Strategies for Expanding Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Community Mental Health Centers (RAND)
Despite MOUD being the standard of care for opioid use disorder, access remains severely limited in Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs), which serve the primary population with co-occurring disorders. A Design Lab pilot identified payment limitations and regulatory complexity as the chief barriers to implementation. The most feasible and high-impact strategy identified was establishing a structured learning exchange between CMHC leaders and insurers to improve reimbursement understanding. Policymakers and payers are therefore advised to pilot this learning exchange model to initiate broader payment reform and expand evidence-based care for this vulnerable population.
-
5.
The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.