The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
The Myth of Authoritarian Stability in the Middle East
English Summary
The article argues that the concept of 'authoritarian stability' in the Middle East is a myth, suggesting that regional regimes are inherently volatile and subject to external manipulation. The analysis uses Donald Trump's contradictory statements regarding Iran and his comparison of regime changes (e.g., Venezuela) as evidence that major powers view the region through a lens of transactional autocracy replacement. This suggests that external interventions are less about promoting stability and more about managing the transition from one powerful regime to another. Policymakers must therefore anticipate instability and the continued use of proxy conflicts, rather than assuming predictable, stable governance structures.
中文摘要
本文論述了「中東的威權穩定」概念是一個神話，指出該地區的政權本質上具有高度不穩定性，且容易受到外部操縱。分析援引了唐納德·川普關於伊朗的矛盾言論，以及他對政權更迭（例如委內瑞拉）的比較，作為證據，證明主要大國看待該地區的視角，是一種「交易性威權政權更替」的透鏡。這暗示外部干預的目的，並非是促進穩定，而是管理從一個強大政權過渡到另一個強大政權的過程。因此，政策制定者必須預期不穩定性以及代理人衝突的持續存在，而非假設存在可預測、穩定的治理結構。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.