The article argues that the Federal Reserve's recent rate hike decision, while justifiable on inflation grounds, highlights a critical lack of an underlying, transparent policy framework. The core problem is that the Fed's decisions appear discretionary, leading to market uncertainty because the committee's judgment, rather than clear data, dictates policy shifts. The author proposes that the Fed adopt a formal monetary policy rule—an algebraic formula linking the target rate to indicators like inflation and unemployment—to replace subjective guidance. Implementing such a rule would provide market predictability, enhance transparency, and shield the Fed from political attacks by making deviations from the standard easily quantifiable.
Ten Commandments Ruling Underscores That Progressives Need School Choice
English Summary
The article argues that school choice is an essential policy for progressives as well as conservatives, particularly following a court ruling allowing religious displays in public classrooms. It highlights a Fifth Circuit decision overturning an injunction against a Louisiana law requiring the Ten Commandments to be posted, illustrating the ongoing legal shift toward allowing more religion in schools. The author concludes that since public schools cannot satisfy all diverse beliefs, educational funding should follow the student to ensure all families can access education aligned with their values.
中文摘要
本文主張教育選擇權對於進步派與保守派而言皆為不可或缺的政策，特別是在法院裁定允許公立教室進行宗教展示之後。文中強調了第五巡迴上訴法院撤銷路易斯安那州法律禁制令的判決（該法律要求張貼「十誡」），說明法律趨勢正轉向允許宗教更多地進入校園。作者總結指出，由於公立學校無法滿足所有多元信仰，教育經費應採行「經費隨學生走」的原則，以確保所有家庭都能獲得符合其價值觀的教育。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The brief challenges current border policies that allow agents to search travelers' digital devices without a warrant, arguing this violates the Fourth Amendment. Cato contends that the existing 'border-search exception' is being misused to grant the government an overly broad, warrantless window into private digital lives. The core argument is that personal possession of data should not be treated as a vulnerability, while third-party cloud storage should not be treated as a refuge. If upheld, these policies transform routine border crossings into invasive investigative checkpoints, significantly eroding constitutional privacy rights.
-
3.
Congress has significantly expanded presidential tariff authority by passing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, allowing the executive to impose up to 100% tariffs on key buyers of Russian energy and sanctions enablers. The article argues that this legislation represents a dangerous abdication of Congress's Article I authority, as it grants the executive vast, discretionary power without specifying criteria for enforcement. Historically, the executive could claim tariffs were its own doing; however, by writing and passing this new authority, Congress now owns the resulting trade policy and its economic consequences. This shift implies that future tariffs will be viewed by the public as a direct legislative action, potentially undermining the administration's credibility and creating political vulnerability.
-
4.
The article argues that conventional K-12 public education is often overly bureaucratic and fails to accommodate individual student needs, stifling creativity and agency. Forest City Academy (FCA) demonstrates an alternative model utilizing state vouchers and a mastery-based curriculum that emphasizes experiential learning, small group instruction, and student choice. This approach, which integrates outdoor play and practical skills alongside limited technology, suggests that policy should expand educational freedom and market-based choice to better align learning environments with holistic child development. Such reforms challenge the status quo by promoting parental agency and decentralized educational decision-making.
-
5.Benoir v. Town of Parksley Brief: Governments Cannot Use Pretextual Reasons to Silence Critics (CATO)
This brief argues that local governments cannot use technical zoning ordinances or procedural loopholes as a pretext to suppress protected speech. The case involves a town attempting to shut down a food truck owner after the owner complained about an initial ban, using a general ordinance despite having made prior commitments. CATO contends that the district court fundamentally misunderstood First Amendment law by allowing the government to evade scrutiny based on technical legality rather than the true motive for the adverse action. If this ruling stands, it significantly weakens free speech protections, enabling local authorities to undermine civil liberties by hiding behind administrative technicalities.