The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
Lessons From 250 Years of U.S. Foreign Policy, With Robert Kagan
English Summary
Robert Kagan argues that U.S. foreign policy is frequently misunderstood as isolationist when it is historically defined by constant global engagement. He refutes the myth of American neutrality, asserting that history shows continuous expansion and interaction with great powers, driven not by external threats but by internal forces. These persistent outward pulls include economic necessity (as a trading nation), universalist ideological values, and the natural consequence of accumulating power. The key implication for policy is that strategic planning must recognize this deeply ingrained pattern of global involvement—rather than viewing it as an occasional deviation from domestic isolationism—to accurately predict future American actions.
中文摘要
羅伯特·卡根論述，美國的外交政策經常被誤解為孤立主義，但其歷史定義卻是持續的全球參與。他反駁了「美國中立」的神話，指出歷史證明美國與大國之間存在著持續的擴張和互動，而這些驅動力並非來自外部威脅，而是源於內在力量。這些持久的外向拉力包括經濟需求（作為一個貿易國家）、普遍主義的意識形態價值觀，以及累積權力的自然結果。對政策而言，關鍵的啟示是：戰略規劃必須認識到這種根深蒂固的全球介入模式——而非將其視為偶爾偏離國內孤立主義的例外情況——才能準確預測美國未來的行動。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.