The Cato Institute warns that the USPS's current handling of mail balloting poses a significant risk of systemic failure ahead of major elections. Key concerns include whistleblower allegations regarding 'batch rejection protocols,' which could invalidate thousands of legitimate ballots, coupled with documented slowdowns in delivery speed and increased rejections for lateness. This instability suggests potential operational or political interference aimed at undermining mail voting integrity. Consequently, the article advises that voters and state election officials must plan to bypass the USPS system by utilizing alternative secure methods, such as drop boxes or early in-person voting, to ensure timely ballot submission.
Friday Feature: Achieve Academy
English Summary
The success of Achieve Academy demonstrates that highly personalized, hands-on microschool models can achieve rapid scalability when supported by state funding mechanisms, such as education savings accounts. The school's growth was directly catalyzed by state subsidies, which allowed it to maintain a unique culture emphasizing deep parental involvement and project-based learning (e.g., entrepreneurship and gardening). This model challenges conventional educational paradigms by prioritizing practical skill development and community integration over traditional classroom settings. Policymakers should note that while state funding boosts enrollment, alternative schools require robust financial reserves to manage unpredictable growth and payment delays.
中文摘要
Achieve Academy 的成功證明，當獲得教育儲蓄帳戶等國家資金機制支持時，高度個人化、實作導向的微型學校模式能夠實現快速擴展。該校的成長直接得益於政府補貼，這使得其得以維持一種獨特的文化氛圍，強調深度的家長參與和專案式學習（例如創業與園藝）。這種模式透過將實用技能發展和社區融入置於傳統課堂設置之上，挑戰了既有的教育範式。政策制定者應留意到，雖然國家資金能推動學員招募，但替代性學校仍需要穩健的財務儲備來管理不可預測的成長與款項延遲。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the United States' aggressive use of tariffs and economic coercion is counterproductive, inspiring international partners to actively circumvent US markets. Instead of increasing dependency on American trade, major global players are deepening cooperation by establishing new free trade agreements (e.g., EU-India, ACFTA, CPTPP) that explicitly exclude the U.S. This trend signals a significant shift toward increased global economic integration outside of US influence. Policymakers should recognize this accelerating decoupling, as it suggests that the traditional American model of trade leverage is rapidly diminishing unless the U.S. commits to upholding multilateral rules and reducing protectionism.
-
3.
The article argues that passing a Continuing Resolution (CR), while preventing an immediate government shutdown, merely preserves an unsustainable fiscal status quo rather than addressing underlying budgetary crises. Congress is criticized for using the CR as an escape route from difficult choices—such as cutting programs or tackling massive deficits—while simultaneously planning to increase debt through reconciliation packages for defense and agriculture. The core problem remains mandatory spending (Social Security, Medicare) driving debt unsustainably. For genuine fiscal stability, the author advises that Congress must move beyond short-term funding measures, prioritize essential functions, and establish a dedicated process to impose discipline on mandatory programs.
-
4.
The article argues that inheritance and estate taxes are detrimental to economic growth, investment, and productivity. Citing Sweden's experience after abolishing the gift and inheritance tax in 2005, the author notes subsequent increases in firm profitability, net sales, and asset values. The core reasoning suggests that removing these taxes allows owner-managers to reinvest capital directly into their companies rather than withdrawing funds for anticipated future tax liabilities. This increased internal investment has been shown to boost corporate financial health and higher corporate income tax payments.
-
5.
The CATO article argues that the US-Venezuela oil deal is deeply problematic due to significant governance and ethical concerns. Key criticisms include a lack of transparency in negotiations, the expansion of state corporatism through government involvement in resource extraction, and questionable legality since it bypasses Venezuelan constitutional requirements. Furthermore, the agreement utilizes a notoriously corrupt private partner and sidelines the democratic opposition, severely undermining US credibility and future diplomatic efforts. Strategically, the deal is viewed as an ill-advised 'imperial resource grab' that risks damaging long-term American influence in Latin America.