The article argues that the Federal Reserve's recent rate hike decision, while justifiable on inflation grounds, highlights a critical lack of an underlying, transparent policy framework. The core problem is that the Fed's decisions appear discretionary, leading to market uncertainty because the committee's judgment, rather than clear data, dictates policy shifts. The author proposes that the Fed adopt a formal monetary policy rule—an algebraic formula linking the target rate to indicators like inflation and unemployment—to replace subjective guidance. Implementing such a rule would provide market predictability, enhance transparency, and shield the Fed from political attacks by making deviations from the standard easily quantifiable.
Puerto Rico's Surging Propane Imports Reveal the Jones Act's Hidden Cost
English Summary
The article argues that the Jones Act imposes significant economic costs on Puerto Rico by artificially restricting its access to cost-effective mainland US propane supplies, forcing reliance on expensive foreign imports. Key evidence comes from a temporary waiver period, during which demand immediately and massively shifted from distant global suppliers to domestic American sources, proving the substantial commercial advantage of mainland supply. This rapid market shift demonstrates that the Act imposes real economic burdens without sustaining any viable American shipping industry in this trade. Policy analysts recommend Congress reform or repeal the restriction, as the current law delivers protectionist costs without generating its intended industrial benefit.
中文摘要
本文指出，《瓊斯法案》（Jones Act）透過人為限制波多黎各（Puerto Rico）獲取具成本效益的本土美國丙烷供應，對其造成了巨大的經濟負擔，迫使其依賴昂貴的進口外國能源。關鍵證據來自於一段臨時豁免期：在此期間，需求立即且大規模地從遙遠的全球供應商轉向國內美洲來源，證明了本土供應所具備的巨大商業優勢。這種快速的市場轉變顯示，《法案》實質上造成了經濟負擔，卻未能維護任何可行的美國航運產業鏈。政策分析師建議國會修訂或廢除此項限制，因為現行法律僅帶來保護主義成本，而無法產生其預期的工業效益。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The brief challenges current border policies that allow agents to search travelers' digital devices without a warrant, arguing this violates the Fourth Amendment. Cato contends that the existing 'border-search exception' is being misused to grant the government an overly broad, warrantless window into private digital lives. The core argument is that personal possession of data should not be treated as a vulnerability, while third-party cloud storage should not be treated as a refuge. If upheld, these policies transform routine border crossings into invasive investigative checkpoints, significantly eroding constitutional privacy rights.
-
3.
The ongoing Ebola outbreak in the DRC serves as a critical warning that the global health security system is fundamentally unprepared for future biological threats. The difficulty in containing this outbreak is compounded by the rising risk of emerging pathogens and the growing potential for AI misuse in bioweapon development. Policy must therefore shift from reactive, crisis-driven funding to sustained, proactive investment in resilient public health infrastructure, particularly in conflict zones. Addressing this requires strengthening global surveillance, ensuring consistent international cooperation, and mitigating the intersection of conflict, climate change, and disease spread.
-
4.A Design Lab Pilot to Inform Strategies for Expanding Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Community Mental Health Centers (RAND)
Despite MOUD being the standard of care for opioid use disorder, access remains severely limited in Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs), which serve the primary population with co-occurring disorders. A Design Lab pilot identified payment limitations and regulatory complexity as the chief barriers to implementation. The most feasible and high-impact strategy identified was establishing a structured learning exchange between CMHC leaders and insurers to improve reimbursement understanding. Policymakers and payers are therefore advised to pilot this learning exchange model to initiate broader payment reform and expand evidence-based care for this vulnerable population.
-
5.
The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.