The article argues that the Federal Reserve's recent rate hike decision, while justifiable on inflation grounds, highlights a critical lack of an underlying, transparent policy framework. The core problem is that the Fed's decisions appear discretionary, leading to market uncertainty because the committee's judgment, rather than clear data, dictates policy shifts. The author proposes that the Fed adopt a formal monetary policy rule—an algebraic formula linking the target rate to indicators like inflation and unemployment—to replace subjective guidance. Implementing such a rule would provide market predictability, enhance transparency, and shield the Fed from political attacks by making deviations from the standard easily quantifiable.
American Corn Growers Have an Ethanol Problem. We Should Stop Enabling It.
English Summary
The Cato Institute argues that federal mandates and subsidies for corn ethanol, particularly through the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), constitute an expensive and unnecessary government intervention. The authors contend that these subsidies are an 'addiction' that primarily benefits large agricultural lobbies and refiners at the expense of taxpayers and consumers. Key evidence cited includes the fact that the RFS has been shown to increase emissions and that the mandates are not essential for fuel performance or market stability. Policy-wise, the report strongly recommends that Congress abolish the entire RFS program, allowing ethanol to find its place purely in the free market and removing government involvement from the transportation fuel business.
中文摘要
卡托學會（Cato Institute）主張，聯邦政府針對玉米乙醇實施的強制配額和補貼，特別是透過《再生燃料標準》（Renewable Fuel Standard, RFS）機制，構成了一項昂貴且不必要的政府干預。作者們認為，這些補貼是一種「成癮性」，其主要受益者是大型農業遊說團體和精煉業者，而代價卻由納稅人和消費者承擔。報告引用的關鍵證據包括：RFS已被證實會增加排放量，且這些強制配額對於燃料性能或市場穩定性並非必需。從政策層面來看，該報告強烈建議國會廢除整個RFS計畫，讓乙醇能夠純粹在自由市場中尋找定位，並將政府參與從運輸燃料業務中移除。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The brief challenges current border policies that allow agents to search travelers' digital devices without a warrant, arguing this violates the Fourth Amendment. Cato contends that the existing 'border-search exception' is being misused to grant the government an overly broad, warrantless window into private digital lives. The core argument is that personal possession of data should not be treated as a vulnerability, while third-party cloud storage should not be treated as a refuge. If upheld, these policies transform routine border crossings into invasive investigative checkpoints, significantly eroding constitutional privacy rights.
-
3.
The ongoing Ebola outbreak in the DRC serves as a critical warning that the global health security system is fundamentally unprepared for future biological threats. The difficulty in containing this outbreak is compounded by the rising risk of emerging pathogens and the growing potential for AI misuse in bioweapon development. Policy must therefore shift from reactive, crisis-driven funding to sustained, proactive investment in resilient public health infrastructure, particularly in conflict zones. Addressing this requires strengthening global surveillance, ensuring consistent international cooperation, and mitigating the intersection of conflict, climate change, and disease spread.
-
4.A Design Lab Pilot to Inform Strategies for Expanding Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Community Mental Health Centers (RAND)
Despite MOUD being the standard of care for opioid use disorder, access remains severely limited in Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs), which serve the primary population with co-occurring disorders. A Design Lab pilot identified payment limitations and regulatory complexity as the chief barriers to implementation. The most feasible and high-impact strategy identified was establishing a structured learning exchange between CMHC leaders and insurers to improve reimbursement understanding. Policymakers and payers are therefore advised to pilot this learning exchange model to initiate broader payment reform and expand evidence-based care for this vulnerable population.
-
5.
The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.