The article argues that the Federal Reserve's recent rate hike decision, while justifiable on inflation grounds, highlights a critical lack of an underlying, transparent policy framework. The core problem is that the Fed's decisions appear discretionary, leading to market uncertainty because the committee's judgment, rather than clear data, dictates policy shifts. The author proposes that the Fed adopt a formal monetary policy rule—an algebraic formula linking the target rate to indicators like inflation and unemployment—to replace subjective guidance. Implementing such a rule would provide market predictability, enhance transparency, and shield the Fed from political attacks by making deviations from the standard easily quantifiable.
Mexico’s Long War: Drugs, Crime, and the Cartels
English Summary
Mexico's two-decade struggle against drug cartels has resulted in escalating violence and instability, with over 463,000 homicides since 2006, despite billions in U.S. security assistance. Powerful cartels like Sinaloa and CJNG continue to dominate the illicit drug trade into the U.S., fueling rampant corruption and overwhelming militarized government responses that often lead to further cartel fragmentation. The recent killing of a major cartel leader, "El Mencho," further destabilized the region, highlighting the ineffectiveness of current strategies in curbing violence and drug demand. This persistent crisis underscores the urgent need for revised, more effective U.S.-Mexico security and counternarcotics policies that address the root causes of cartel power and violence.
中文摘要
墨西哥近二十年來與販毒集團的對抗，導致暴力衝突與局勢動盪日益加劇。儘管美國已提供數十億美元的安全援助，自 2006 年以來，相關謀殺案仍累計超過 46.3 萬起。錫納羅亞（Sinaloa）與哈利斯科新世代（CJNG）等勢力龐大的販毒集團，持續主導向美國輸送的非法毒品貿易，不僅助長了猖獗的腐敗，更使政府的軍事化應對措施疲於奔命，且往往導致集團進一步碎片化。近期主要首領「埃爾·門喬」（El Mencho）遭擊斃，進一步動搖了區域穩定，凸顯出當前策略在遏制暴力與毒品需求方面的成效不彰。此一持續性的危機，凸顯了美墨雙方迫切需要修訂更具成效的安全與禁毒政策，以從根源解決販毒集團的權力與暴力問題。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The ongoing Ebola outbreak in the DRC serves as a critical warning that the global health security system is fundamentally unprepared for future biological threats. The difficulty in containing this outbreak is compounded by the rising risk of emerging pathogens and the growing potential for AI misuse in bioweapon development. Policy must therefore shift from reactive, crisis-driven funding to sustained, proactive investment in resilient public health infrastructure, particularly in conflict zones. Addressing this requires strengthening global surveillance, ensuring consistent international cooperation, and mitigating the intersection of conflict, climate change, and disease spread.
-
3.A Design Lab Pilot to Inform Strategies for Expanding Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Community Mental Health Centers (RAND)
Despite MOUD being the standard of care for opioid use disorder, access remains severely limited in Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs), which serve the primary population with co-occurring disorders. A Design Lab pilot identified payment limitations and regulatory complexity as the chief barriers to implementation. The most feasible and high-impact strategy identified was establishing a structured learning exchange between CMHC leaders and insurers to improve reimbursement understanding. Policymakers and payers are therefore advised to pilot this learning exchange model to initiate broader payment reform and expand evidence-based care for this vulnerable population.
-
4.
The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.
-
5.
Congress has significantly expanded presidential tariff authority by passing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, allowing the executive to impose up to 100% tariffs on key buyers of Russian energy and sanctions enablers. The article argues that this legislation represents a dangerous abdication of Congress's Article I authority, as it grants the executive vast, discretionary power without specifying criteria for enforcement. Historically, the executive could claim tariffs were its own doing; however, by writing and passing this new authority, Congress now owns the resulting trade policy and its economic consequences. This shift implies that future tariffs will be viewed by the public as a direct legislative action, potentially undermining the administration's credibility and creating political vulnerability.