The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
250 Years of American Foreign Policy
English Summary
The article traces U.S. foreign policy over 250 years, arguing that American history is defined by recurring tensions between protecting national self-interest and articulating stated ideals. Key evidence highlights how the US has navigated this tension through strategic actions—such as securing alliances (France), establishing regional authority (Monroe Doctrine), and expanding territory via diplomacy or conflict (Louisiana Purchase). The enduring policy challenge, therefore, remains determining when to intervene in foreign conflicts, how to balance moral principles with strategic needs, and managing the responsibilities inherent in growing global power. These historical dilemmas continue to shape modern American geopolitical strategy.
中文摘要
本文追溯了美國跨越兩百五十年的外交政策，論點指出美國歷史的定義，源於保護國家自身利益與闡述既定理想之間不斷重複的張力。關鍵證據突顯了美國如何透過一系列戰略行動來應對這種張力——例如確保聯盟（法國）、建立區域權威（門羅主義），以及透過外交或衝突擴張領土（路易斯安那購買）。因此，持續存在的政策挑戰在於判斷何時介入外國衝突、如何在道德原則與戰略需求之間取得平衡，以及管理作為一個日益強大的全球性力量所固有的責任。這些歷史困境至今仍持續形塑著現代美國的地緣政治策略。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.