The article argues that the Federal Reserve's recent rate hike decision, while justifiable on inflation grounds, highlights a critical lack of an underlying, transparent policy framework. The core problem is that the Fed's decisions appear discretionary, leading to market uncertainty because the committee's judgment, rather than clear data, dictates policy shifts. The author proposes that the Fed adopt a formal monetary policy rule—an algebraic formula linking the target rate to indicators like inflation and unemployment—to replace subjective guidance. Implementing such a rule would provide market predictability, enhance transparency, and shield the Fed from political attacks by making deviations from the standard easily quantifiable.
Raising the Federal Minimum Wage Is a Solution in Search of a Problem
English Summary
This CATO Institute analysis argues against raising the federal minimum wage, asserting that the premise of a ‘problem’ is flawed. The effective minimum wage faced by most American workers is significantly higher than the current $7.25 federal rate, averaging $12.13 due to rising state and local minimums and productivity growth. A higher federal floor would disproportionately harm low-productivity sectors and rural areas where wage floors are already relatively high, potentially leading to widespread job losses. The analysis highlights that the size of the ‘bite’ – the ratio of the minimum wage to median wages – is a more critical factor in determining employment impacts, and that larger increases would be particularly disruptive. Ultimately, the report concludes that existing state and local minimum wage policies effectively address wage concerns, rendering a federal hike unnecessary and potentially detrimental.
中文摘要
本 Cato Institute 的分析認為，提高聯邦最低工資的論點是站不住腳的。大多數美國工人的實際最低工資遠高於當前的 7.25 美元，平均為 12.13 美元，這主要歸因於州和地方最低工資的提高以及生產力增長。 提高聯邦最低工資將不成比例地損害低生產力部門和工資地板已經相對較高的鄉村地區，可能導致大規模失業。 分析指出，最低工資與中位工資的比例（即「咬合」大小）是決定就業影響的更關鍵因素，更大的提高將尤其擾亂經濟。 最終，報告結論認為，現有的州和地方最低工資政策有效地解決了工資問題，因此聯邦提高不必要也不可能帶來益處，反而可能造成危害。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The brief challenges current border policies that allow agents to search travelers' digital devices without a warrant, arguing this violates the Fourth Amendment. Cato contends that the existing 'border-search exception' is being misused to grant the government an overly broad, warrantless window into private digital lives. The core argument is that personal possession of data should not be treated as a vulnerability, while third-party cloud storage should not be treated as a refuge. If upheld, these policies transform routine border crossings into invasive investigative checkpoints, significantly eroding constitutional privacy rights.
-
3.
The ongoing Ebola outbreak in the DRC serves as a critical warning that the global health security system is fundamentally unprepared for future biological threats. The difficulty in containing this outbreak is compounded by the rising risk of emerging pathogens and the growing potential for AI misuse in bioweapon development. Policy must therefore shift from reactive, crisis-driven funding to sustained, proactive investment in resilient public health infrastructure, particularly in conflict zones. Addressing this requires strengthening global surveillance, ensuring consistent international cooperation, and mitigating the intersection of conflict, climate change, and disease spread.
-
4.A Design Lab Pilot to Inform Strategies for Expanding Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Community Mental Health Centers (RAND)
Despite MOUD being the standard of care for opioid use disorder, access remains severely limited in Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs), which serve the primary population with co-occurring disorders. A Design Lab pilot identified payment limitations and regulatory complexity as the chief barriers to implementation. The most feasible and high-impact strategy identified was establishing a structured learning exchange between CMHC leaders and insurers to improve reimbursement understanding. Policymakers and payers are therefore advised to pilot this learning exchange model to initiate broader payment reform and expand evidence-based care for this vulnerable population.
-
5.
The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.