The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act Is Sound Policy
English Summary
CATO argues that the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (Section 604 of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act) is sound policy because it correctly distinguishes software developers from money transmitters, preventing those who write blockchain code but never hold user assets from being regulated as financial institutions. The article contends that opponents' law-enforcement concerns are misplaced, since the provision preserves criminal liability for knowingly handling illicit funds and is consistent with the DOJ's own position that writing code without criminal intent is not a crime. CATO further warns that failing to pass the provision would drive developers offshore—noting the U.S. share of open-source blockchain developers has already dropped from 25% to 18%—reducing law enforcement visibility while extending a Bank Secrecy Act surveillance regime that already costs $59 billion annually yet yields minimal investigative leads.
中文摘要
CATO 認為《區塊鏈監管確定性法案》（《數位資產市場透明度法案》第604條）是合理的政策，因為該法案正確區分了軟體開發者與資金傳輸業者，使撰寫區塊鏈程式碼但從未持有用戶資產的開發者免於被視為金融機構而受到監管。文章主張反對者的執法疑慮並不成立，因為該條款保留了對故意處理非法資金者的刑事責任，且與美國司法部的立場一致——即在無犯罪意圖的情況下撰寫程式碼並不構成犯罪。CATO 進一步警告，若未能通過該條款，將迫使開發者外移至海外——指出美國在開源區塊鏈開發者中的佔比已從25%下降至18%——這不僅會降低執法機構的可見度，還會延續每年耗資590億美元卻僅產生極少調查線索的《銀行保密法》監控體制。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Mini cities are temporary, child-run educational models—originating in Germany and Austria—that simulate real civic life by having children manage businesses, elect officials, pay taxes, and handle legal disputes. The core argument is that these hands-on experiences provide a superior learning environment compared to conventional schooling because children learn through the natural consequences of their actions rather than abstract grades. Policy implications suggest expanding this model from temporary summer programs into permanent, year-round structures that blur the line between play and real economic activity, potentially serving as a comprehensive 'launching pad' for future adult careers.