The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
Always Under Siege: Olga Freidenberg’s Diary-Theory and the Everyday Terror of Stalinism
English Summary
The article analyzes Olga Freidenberg’s diary from the Siege of Leningrad, proposing that her account serves as a profound metaphor for life under totalitarian regimes like Stalinism. The core argument is that constant state oppression constitutes an 'everyday terror,' which amounts to a systematic siege on human dignity and privacy—a condition of complete unfreedom. By treating Freidenberg's notes as an anthropological study, the analysis develops a political theory detailing how total denial of choice or escape defines modern tyranny. This framework suggests that understanding historical atrocities requires focusing not just on grand political events, but on the pervasive mechanisms of daily psychological and physical control.
中文摘要
本文分析了奧爾加·弗賴登伯格（Olga Freidenberg）在倫巴甫區圍城期間的日記，提出她的記錄可作為一種深刻的隱喻，用以描繪生活在斯大林主義等極權政權下的狀態。核心論點指出，持續不斷的國家壓迫構成了一種「日常恐怖」，這本質上是對人類尊嚴和私密性的系統性圍困——即徹底缺乏自由的生存條件。透過將弗賴登伯格的筆記視為一項人類學研究，本文發展出了一套政治理論，詳細闡述了選擇或逃脫權利的完全剝奪如何定義現代暴政。此框架建議，理解歷史上的暴行，不應僅著眼於宏大的政治事件，而必須聚焦於日常心理和身體控制的普遍機制。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.
-
5.
Washington's increasing diplomatic and economic support for Morocco's claims over Western Sahara is significantly undermining regional peace efforts and exacerbating existing tensions. This alignment, which sidelines the UN's mandate (MINURSO) and solidifies a pro-Moroccan bloc, is evidenced by U.S. funding and political efforts to undermine the Polisario movement. Critically, this perceived bias is prompting regional rivals, particularly Algeria, to increase their own military and diplomatic involvement to counter the growing influence of the Morocco-Israel axis. Ultimately, the article warns that Washington's zero-sum approach of choosing sides, while aiming for stability, is likely to worsen the conflict outlook across the fragile North African continent.