ThinkTankWeekly

Fate in My Hands: The Death Penalty in the Soviet Union

Foreign Affairs | 2026-10-20 | society

Topics: Russia

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

Historian Skorobogatov analyzes the shift in the use of the death penalty in the Soviet Union (mid-1950s–1991), arguing that the state ceased using capital punishment as a primary political weapon. Key evidence drawn from death row appeals shows a dramatic change in rhetoric: initially, inmates appealed to the state as a moral arbiter by portraying themselves as model citizens. By the late Soviet period, this shifted to adopting 'legal talk,' focusing on due process violations and abuse. This linguistic shift reflects a broader decline in faith in the communist state and a growing emphasis on individual rights and alternative spiritual pursuits.

中文摘要

歷史學家斯科羅博加托夫(Skorobogatov)分析了蘇聯時期(1950年代中期至1991年)死刑使用方式的轉變,論點指出國家已停止將死刑作為主要的政治武器。從死囚申訴案的關鍵證據可見,其修辭風格發生了戲劇性變化:初期,罪犯訴諸國家作為道德仲裁者,將自身描繪為模範公民。到了蘇聯後期,這種訴求轉變為採用「法律語言」,重點關注程序瑕疵和權利濫用。這種語言上的轉變,反映了對共產主義國家信念的整體衰退,以及對個人權利和替代性精神追求日益增長的重視。

Related Entries

  1. 1.
    2026-11-07 | defense | 2026-W45 | Topics: Indo-Pacific, Middle East, United States

    The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  2. 2.
    2026-11-07 | middle_east | 2026-W45 | Topics: China, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  3. 3.
    2026-11-07 | economy | 2026-W45 | Topics: China, Europe, Trade

    China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  4. 4.

    The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  5. 5.
    2026-11-05 | middle_east | 2026-W45 | Topics: Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    Washington's increasing diplomatic and economic support for Morocco's claims over Western Sahara is significantly undermining regional peace efforts and exacerbating existing tensions. This alignment, which sidelines the UN's mandate (MINURSO) and solidifies a pro-Moroccan bloc, is evidenced by U.S. funding and political efforts to undermine the Polisario movement. Critically, this perceived bias is prompting regional rivals, particularly Algeria, to increase their own military and diplomatic involvement to counter the growing influence of the Morocco-Israel axis. Ultimately, the article warns that Washington's zero-sum approach of choosing sides, while aiming for stability, is likely to worsen the conflict outlook across the fragile North African continent.

    Read at CFR