The article outlines how a successful modern foreign policy career requires blending traditional diplomatic expertise with private sector acumen. Juster's career trajectory—from international law to high-stakes diplomacy (e.g., the Gulf War) and subsequently to the technology sector—demonstrates this synthesis. Key evidence includes his work managing complex negotiations under duress and his involvement in co-founding the U.S.-India High Technology Group. The implication for policy is that effective geopolitical strategy must actively integrate private sector knowledge and technological considerations to manage modern economic and security challenges.
No Borders: Journeys Across Islands and Continents
English Summary
This piece argues that cultural identity and belonging are fluid, complex phenomena that defy the rigid boundaries of modern nation-states. The author's personal history—moving across Java, Malaysia, and China—serves as evidence that human identity is shaped by diasporic experience rather than fixed borders. For policy analysis, the core implication is that geopolitical strategies must account for cultural inheritance and transnational loyalties, particularly in the volatile South China Sea region. Policymakers should therefore avoid relying solely on narrow nationalist definitions when assessing regional stability or ethnic group movements.
中文摘要
本文論述文化認同與歸屬感是流動且複雜的現象，無法被現代民族國家的僵化邊界所限制。作者的個人經歷——在爪哇、馬來西亞和中國間遷徙——證明了人類的身份認同是由離散的經驗所塑造，而非由固定的邊界所決定。對於政策分析而言，核心啟示是地緣政治策略必須考量文化傳承和跨國忠誠度，尤其是在不穩定的南海地區。因此，政策制定者在評估區域穩定性或族群移動時，應避免僅依賴狹隘的民族主義定義。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The analysis concludes that China will hold the upper hand at the upcoming Trump-Xi summit, leveraging its dominance over critical minerals, rare earths, and magnet supply chains. This geopolitical leverage, combined with global instability (such as the Iran conflict), allows Beijing to dictate terms and buy time to consolidate its technological and industrial self-sufficiency. Strategically, the U.S. must avoid granting China a managed equilibrium by maintaining 'maximum pressure' on key sectors like AI and tech, rather than seeking broad agreements that could undermine American leadership.
-
3.
The analysis cautions that the upcoming Trump-Xi summit must not result in short-term strategic concessions for the US, which risks undermining long-term stability. China is rapidly consolidating global power, leveraging US policy shifts and increasing its assertiveness across the Indo-Pacific and in technology. Strategically, the US must prioritize addressing the immediate crisis in Iran, where China holds significant leverage, and must also focus on joint cooperation on AI. Ultimately, the US must resist political impulses and pursue a robust strategy to counter China's growing challenge to global dominance.
-
4.Rare earths are on Trump’s agenda in China. But US electronic waste offers an untapped source at home (Chatham House)
While China maintains critical dominance over the global rare earth processing supply chain, the US possesses a substantial, untapped domestic resource: electronic waste (e-waste). Estimates suggest that annual US e-waste contains enough rare earth magnets to meet a significant portion of projected domestic demand, far exceeding current domestic mining capacity. However, this potential is hampered by a lack of uniform federal recycling laws and specialized collection infrastructure, leading to valuable materials leaking out of the economy. To achieve mineral security, the US must shift its strategy from solely developing new mines to establishing a robust circular economy model. This requires federal policy intervention, investment in advanced separation technologies, and incentivizing product design for easy disassembly.
-
5.
The CFR analysis posits that the Trump-Xi summit is a critical juncture with the potential to fundamentally reshape global trade and technology competition. Key discussions center on nuanced economic strategies, such as China's financial maneuvering (e.g., dollar hoarding) and the necessity for allied manufacturing to counter China's technological dominance in areas like AI and robotics. Policymakers must therefore prepare for significant shifts in the bilateral relationship, emphasizing the need to strengthen allied supply chains and technological resilience to mitigate geopolitical risks.