The publication argues that current efforts to improve the well-being of men and boys of color are too fragmented, failing to account for the structural linkages between systems like education, employment, and criminal justice. It proposes a new, holistic framework that traces how structural conditions flow through multiple domains to measurable outcomes, such as longevity. Key reasoning emphasizes the need to treat 'place' as a fundamental actor and to identify successful communities where these populations are already thriving. Policy implications require shifting away from individual-focused interventions toward developing structural, place-based agendas that address systemic inequities.
Why girls in marginalized contexts? A commitment to justice and agency in research
English Summary
The Brookings analysis argues that understanding girls' marginalization requires centering their lived experiences and shifting away from deficit-based language like "vulnerability" or "empowerment." Marginalization is identified as a complex, systemic issue driven by multi-dimensional factors including poverty, early marriage, gender-based violence, and climate change, which disproportionately affect girls across various contexts. For policy and research to be effective, the authors advocate for a participatory, justice-oriented approach that engages girls as co-constructors of knowledge. This strategic shift is crucial for developing solutions that address the root systemic causes of exclusion rather than merely treating symptoms.
中文摘要
布魯金斯智庫的分析指出，要理解女童的邊緣化現象，必須以其真實生活經驗為核心，並擺脫「脆弱性」或「賦權」等缺乏導向的語言。邊緣化被界定為一個複雜的系統性問題，其驅動因素是多維度的，包括貧困、早婚、性別暴力和氣候變遷等，這些因素在各種背景下不成比例地影響著女童。為使政策和研究更具實效性，作者倡導採用參與式、正義導向的方法，讓女童成為知識的共同建構者。這種策略性的轉變至關重要，因為它能幫助制定出解決根源系統性排斥問題的方案，而非僅僅處理表象症狀。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
3.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.
-
4.
The article analyzes the deep ideological split within the Democratic Party regarding the future of U.S. foreign policy, pitting centrists against progressives. Centrists generally advocate for restoring a reformed U.S.-led international order and strengthening alliances, while progressives argue for a multipolar world that prioritizes transnational threats like climate change and AI over geopolitical competition. This division is most pronounced in the Middle East, where centrists push for greater pressure on Israel and a regional settlement, a shift largely welcomed by progressives. The core finding is that these internal debates threaten to consume a future administration with indecision, making it difficult for the U.S. to project a coherent and unified global strategy.
-
5.
The 2026 midterms are expected to dramatically tighten the regulatory environment for data center development, shifting power away from developers and toward local communities. This shift is fueled by rising public opposition, leading to local moratoriums, and potential legislative actions such as repealing tax exemptions and mandating that developers cover full energy costs (ratepayer protection). Consequently, the industry faces increased operational and construction costs, stricter permitting requirements, and mandatory community engagement protocols. These changes suggest a move toward greater regulatory oversight, particularly regarding energy use and the mandatory disclosure of AI activities.