The article argues that the Federal Reserve's recent rate hike decision, while justifiable on inflation grounds, highlights a critical lack of an underlying, transparent policy framework. The core problem is that the Fed's decisions appear discretionary, leading to market uncertainty because the committee's judgment, rather than clear data, dictates policy shifts. The author proposes that the Fed adopt a formal monetary policy rule—an algebraic formula linking the target rate to indicators like inflation and unemployment—to replace subjective guidance. Implementing such a rule would provide market predictability, enhance transparency, and shield the Fed from political attacks by making deviations from the standard easily quantifiable.
The End of Nuclear Diplomacy
English Summary
The U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear infrastructure in 2025-2026 represent the end of diplomatic nonproliferation efforts, replacing negotiated agreements with Israel's 'mowing the grass' strategy of recurring military strikes. After decades where the JCPOA and IAEA inspections failed to gain durable support, Israel shifted to preemption following the October 7 attacks and Iranian protests in 2026. Rather than build large underground facilities, Iran will likely pursue decentralized nuclear programs using small, concealed workshops to evade detection and satellite surveillance. This marks the effective collapse of the global nonproliferation regime, as the deterrence value of nuclear weapons has never been higher and no arms control processes now constrain production. The U.S. remains committed to the Middle East despite decades seeking to pivot to East Asia, with significant implications for regional stability and global commodity flows.
中文摘要
2025-2026年美以軍事打擊伊朗核基礎設施，標誌著外交核不擴散努力的終結，用以色列的「割草」戰略（定期軍事打擊）取代了談判達成的協議。在《聯合全面行動計畫》與國際原子能機構檢查數十年未能獲得持久支持後，以色列在2023年十月七日攻擊及2026年伊朗抗議活動後轉向先發制人戰略。伊朗將可能放棄大型地下設施，改採分散式核計畫，利用小型隱蔽工坊規避偵測與衛星監控。此舉標誌著全球核不擴散體制的實質性崩潰，因為核武器的威懾價值前所未有之高，且當前無任何軍備控制流程能制約核武生產。儘管美國數十年來尋求戰略重心向東亞轉移，但仍維持對中東的承諾，此舉對區域穩定與全球商品流動造成重大影響。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The ongoing Ebola outbreak in the DRC serves as a critical warning that the global health security system is fundamentally unprepared for future biological threats. The difficulty in containing this outbreak is compounded by the rising risk of emerging pathogens and the growing potential for AI misuse in bioweapon development. Policy must therefore shift from reactive, crisis-driven funding to sustained, proactive investment in resilient public health infrastructure, particularly in conflict zones. Addressing this requires strengthening global surveillance, ensuring consistent international cooperation, and mitigating the intersection of conflict, climate change, and disease spread.
-
3.A Design Lab Pilot to Inform Strategies for Expanding Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Community Mental Health Centers (RAND)
Despite MOUD being the standard of care for opioid use disorder, access remains severely limited in Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs), which serve the primary population with co-occurring disorders. A Design Lab pilot identified payment limitations and regulatory complexity as the chief barriers to implementation. The most feasible and high-impact strategy identified was establishing a structured learning exchange between CMHC leaders and insurers to improve reimbursement understanding. Policymakers and payers are therefore advised to pilot this learning exchange model to initiate broader payment reform and expand evidence-based care for this vulnerable population.
-
4.
The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.
-
5.
Congress has significantly expanded presidential tariff authority by passing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, allowing the executive to impose up to 100% tariffs on key buyers of Russian energy and sanctions enablers. The article argues that this legislation represents a dangerous abdication of Congress's Article I authority, as it grants the executive vast, discretionary power without specifying criteria for enforcement. Historically, the executive could claim tariffs were its own doing; however, by writing and passing this new authority, Congress now owns the resulting trade policy and its economic consequences. This shift implies that future tariffs will be viewed by the public as a direct legislative action, potentially undermining the administration's credibility and creating political vulnerability.