The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
Hungary’s reset with Ukraine is good news for European deterrence
English Summary
The article argues that Hungary’s emerging 'reset' with Ukraine represents a significant strategic positive for European deterrence. By resolving the Transcarpathia minority dispute, the new government shifts from outright obstruction to conditional cooperation, removing a major political impediment to Kyiv's EU accession talks. This development reduces Russia's ability to exploit internal divisions within the EU and NATO by demonstrating that Europe can manage disputes without succumbing to strategic paralysis. Ultimately, this process is crucial for restoring credibility to the continent’s collective resolve regarding Ukraine's future.
中文摘要
本文論述，匈牙利與烏克蘭之間正在形成的「重置」（reset）具有重要的戰略積極意義，能強化歐洲的威懾力。透過解決特蘭斯卡爾派亞少數族裔爭端，新政府的角色已從完全阻撓轉向有條件的合作，消除了阻礙基輔參與歐盟加入談判的主要政治障礙。這一發展降低了俄羅斯利用歐盟和北約內部分歧的能力，證明歐洲能夠在不陷入戰略癱瘓的情況下管理爭端。最終而言，這個過程對於恢復大陸在烏克蘭未來問題上的集體決心和信譽至關重要。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
3.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
4.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.
-
5.
The article argues that bond market behavior is not driven by an 'addiction' to tariff revenue but rather by the government’s overall fiscal health, growth prospects, and debt servicing capacity. Key evidence shows that customs duties generate a fraction of total federal receipts compared to core tax streams, meaning tariffs are too small to fundamentally alter the nation's fiscal trajectory. Furthermore, market reactions were dictated by the aggregate economic damage caused by large tariffs (inflation/growth concerns), not merely the revenue generated. Policymakers should recognize that the real concern for bond investors remains persistent budget deficits and high interest costs, issues that require comprehensive structural reform rather than reliance on tariff income.