This analysis reviews pivotal U.S. foreign policy decisions over 250 years, ranking them by their historical impact on global stability and American leadership. Key successes—such as the Marshall Plan, the creation of NATO, and the establishment of the Bretton Woods system—are attributed to proactive diplomacy and institutional building that stabilized post-war international order. The findings suggest that effective U.S. strategy relies heavily on establishing multilateral frameworks and managing geopolitical risks through careful statecraft. Ultimately, the article implies that historical analysis guides policy by emphasizing the necessity of strategic alliances and economic cooperation to maintain global influence.
Why demining the Strait of Hormuz will be difficult – but also presents an opportunity
English Summary
While reopening the Strait of Hormuz is critical for global shipping, clearing the estimated 80 mines will be an extremely difficult and complex technical challenge due to advanced mine types and current traffic congestion. Successful demining requires sustained international cooperation among major powers (including the US, UK, and EU) because no single nation possesses the necessary resources or trust to complete the task alone. Strategically, Iran's participation in clearing the mines offers a vital opportunity for Tehran to demonstrate commitment to de-escalation. Ultimately, the article argues that technical success hinges on achieving a sustained political solution: all parties must commit to an extended cessation of hostilities and guarantee safe passage for mine countermeasures.
中文摘要
雖然重新開放霍爾木茲海峽對於全球航運至關重要，但清除預計的 80 枚地雷將是一個極其困難且複雜的技術挑戰，原因在於先進的地雷類型和目前的交通擁堵狀況。成功的排雷工作需要主要大國（包括美國、英國和歐盟）之間持續的國際合作，因為沒有單一國家擁有獨立完成此任務所需的資源或信任度。從戰略角度來看，伊朗參與清除地雷提供了特爾阿方展示其致力於降級升溫的重要機會。最終，本文論點指出，技術上的成功取決於實現一個持久的政治解決方案：所有相關方必須承諾延長停止敵對行動，並確保排雷行動的安全通道。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
Chinese AI models are rapidly closing the capability gap with U.S. frontier models, demonstrating high performance in coding and agent tasks through open-weight releases. This rapid progress is fueled by techniques like knowledge distillation and the decentralized nature of the open-source community, allowing Chinese labs to achieve competitive models at lower costs than closed US APIs. Strategically, this forces the United States to shift its focus from merely leading in model capability to ensuring global adoption of the 'American AI stack.' To maintain global leadership, U.S. policy must prioritize building trust and reducing pricing barriers, as foreign actors will diversify away from unpredictable or expensive American providers.
-
3.
This CFR project analyzes two and a half centuries of U.S. foreign policy decisions, arguing that historical patterns offer crucial lessons for current strategic challenges. The core finding, derived from surveys of leading historians, identifies the Marshall Plan as the consensus best decision due to its stabilizing role in post-WWII Europe and its humanitarian impact. These findings imply that successful long-term U.S. strategy often involves large-scale diplomatic investments aimed at rebuilding key international partners or promoting regional stability. Policymakers should view historical success not just through military action, but through sustained efforts to stabilize global systems.
-
4.
While the US has opted not to renew the USMCA for a full term, triggering an annual review process until 2036, this non-renewal does not signal the end of North American integration. The continued economic dependence—which supports trillions in trade and millions of jobs—makes withdrawal highly unlikely despite political tensions and tariff threats. Strategically, businesses must prepare for prolonged uncertainty and protracted negotiations across multiple sectors (e.g., auto rules, digital trade). Policymakers should focus on managing the ongoing review process to mitigate supply chain disruption and address shared concerns regarding Chinese overcapacity in the region.
-
5.
The article argues that maintaining strict civil control over the military is paramount to the health of the republic, warning that using armed forces for domestic or political issues constitutes dangerous 'mission creep.' Historically, leaders like Washington established this principle by deferring authority to civilian representatives; however, modern times show a public tendency to rely on the military to solve complex national problems. This reliance risks diverting the force from its primary combat mission and undermining democratic institutions. For policy, the implication is that national strength depends not on military capability alone, but on citizens actively engaging in political life and local communities, thereby strengthening civilian governance.