The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
How can Sheinbaum’s Mexico coexist peacefully with Trump’s America?
English Summary
Mexico is at a critical juncture under President Sheinbaum, who is driving significant internal reforms across governance, the rule of law, and democratic institutions. Externally, Mexico's relationship with the United States is becoming increasingly complex, characterized by deepening cooperation in trade, migration, and security alongside rising tensions over sovereignty and democratic standards. The central strategic challenge is how Sheinbaum will navigate these competing pressures. Mexico's internal political trajectory and foreign policy signals are thus crucial, as they will define the stability of US-Mexico relations and influence broader regional stability in the years ahead.
中文摘要
在雪恩鮑姆總統的領導下，墨西哥正處於關鍵時刻，她正在推動涵蓋治理、法治和民主制度的重大內部改革。在外部層面，墨西哥與美國的關係正變得日益複雜，其特點是在貿易、移民和安全領域深化合作，但同時也伴隨著關於主權和民主標準的緊張局勢上升。核心戰略挑戰在於雪恩鮑姆將如何平衡這些相互競爭的壓力。因此，墨西哥的內部政治軌跡和外交政策信號至關重要，因為它們將決定美墨關係的穩定性，並影響未來更廣泛的區域穩定。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
3.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.
-
4.
The article argues that bond market behavior is not driven by an 'addiction' to tariff revenue but rather by the government’s overall fiscal health, growth prospects, and debt servicing capacity. Key evidence shows that customs duties generate a fraction of total federal receipts compared to core tax streams, meaning tariffs are too small to fundamentally alter the nation's fiscal trajectory. Furthermore, market reactions were dictated by the aggregate economic damage caused by large tariffs (inflation/growth concerns), not merely the revenue generated. Policymakers should recognize that the real concern for bond investors remains persistent budget deficits and high interest costs, issues that require comprehensive structural reform rather than reliance on tariff income.
-
5.
The author argues that the new 'Section 301' tariffs, ostensibly targeting forced labor, are not a genuine human rights measure but rather an attempt to re-establish a broad, punitive tariff wall. Key evidence supporting this claim includes the rushed nature of the investigation (98 pages for 60 economies), the lack of specific economic harm analysis, and the imposition of disproportionately high tariffs that far exceed any proportional response. Strategically, the use of human rights language to generate revenue sets a dangerous precedent, potentially allowing future administrations to bypass legislative processes and misuse trade law. The article concludes by urging Congress to reform these laws before they cause further damage to international trade frameworks.