Congress has significantly expanded presidential tariff authority by passing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, allowing the executive to impose up to 100% tariffs on key buyers of Russian energy and sanctions enablers. The article argues that this legislation represents a dangerous abdication of Congress's Article I authority, as it grants the executive vast, discretionary power without specifying criteria for enforcement. Historically, the executive could claim tariffs were its own doing; however, by writing and passing this new authority, Congress now owns the resulting trade policy and its economic consequences. This shift implies that future tariffs will be viewed by the public as a direct legislative action, potentially undermining the administration's credibility and creating political vulnerability.
Navigating a changing global order: Ghana’s strategic priorities
English Summary
Ghana is strategically positioning itself as a key actor in the fragmenting, multipolar global order by adopting a policy of 'multi-alignment.' The nation is deepening its regional influence by promoting West African security cooperation and hosting the AfCFTA Secretariat, while simultaneously championing global justice and inclusive multilateralism. This strategy involves initiatives like the Accra Reset and leading UN efforts to recognize the transatlantic slave trade as a crime against humanity. For policy makers, Ghana's approach suggests that African states are actively leveraging non-alignment to promote continental agency and contribute to a more balanced international governance system.
中文摘要
迦納正透過採納「多重定位」（multi-alignment）政策，策略性地將自身定位為碎片化、多極化全球秩序中的關鍵參與者。該國透過推動西非安全合作並承辦非洲大陸自由貿易區（AfCFTA）秘書處，深化其區域影響力；同時，它也積極倡導全球正義與包容性的多邊主義。此策略體現於「阿克拉重啟」（Accra Reset）等倡議，以及主導聯合國努力將跨大西洋奴隸貿易定性為危害人類罪行。對於政策制定者而言，迦納的做法顯示，非洲國家正積極利用不結盟的立場，以提升大陸的主體能動性，並為建立更平衡的國際治理體系做出貢獻。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
Cuba is on a trajectory toward an accelerating state and economic collapse, risking a point of no return. The state is deteriorating into "authoritarian anarchy," retaining its capacity for political repression but losing the ability to provide basic public services like health and safety. Economically, while the private sector is growing, this expansion is highly unequal, fueling cronyism and widening class gaps between the elite and the poor. If the current trend continues, the country risks calcifying these defects into a dysfunctional baseline, severely diminishing the chances of a stable, democratic transition.
-
3.
The article argues that China's ongoing purges are not signs of weakness, but rather a sophisticated, historically rooted process of 'rectification' that strengthens the CCP's grip on power. This mechanism requires cadres to submit mandatory self-criticisms and build permanent, detailed personnel files (dossiers). This system of record-keeping is the CCP's primary source of resilience, creating profound, internalized discipline that controls internal dissent. Policymakers must recognize that the regime's durability stems from this deep internal control mechanism, making succession—rather than internal purges—the ultimate strategic vulnerability.
-
4.
The analysis argues that contemporary warfare is marked by a return to great power competition, often fueled by strategic hubris and historical overconfidence. A key failure across modern conflicts is the 'short-war fallacy'—the assumption that overwhelming military force guarantees a quick, decisive victory. This mindset blinds policymakers to the need for sustained resource mobilization and complex political outcomes. Consequently, effective strategy requires linking military objectives with clear, comprehensive political goals, rather than pursuing rapid, decisive regime changes or military victories in isolation.
-
5.
The report argues that the rapid integration of AI creates novel and complex risks—such as deepfakes, misinformation, and intellectual property disputes—that do not fit within existing insurance lines, challenging the technology's overall insurability. Evidence shows that while lawsuits center on IP, the scope of harm is expanding into privacy and product liability, and insurers are responding unevenly with a mix of exclusions and limited coverage. Policymakers must therefore focus on managing systemic, correlated AI risks, including shared model dependencies and universal attacks, to prevent market failure and guide necessary regulatory oversight.