The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
Testing the Future of Joint All-Domain Operations in Africa
English Summary
The article argues that the U.S. must establish 'battle labs' in Africa to test modern Joint All-Domain Operations (JADO), as current domestic ranges cannot accommodate the vast spatial requirements of multi-domain warfare (e.g., drones, EW, cyber). Africa, particularly Morocco, is identified as a prime location due to its open terrain, growing drone sectors, stability, and developing indigenous defense industrial base. Strategically, establishing these labs allows the U.S. to validate advanced operational concepts, accelerate military modernization, and build resilient partner supply chains. Ultimately, this capability serves as a powerful deterrent signal to China, demonstrating the ability to project power and impose costs on rival interests globally.
中文摘要
本文論述美國必須在非洲建立「戰場實驗室」（battle labs），以測試現代的聯合全域作戰（JADO）。由於現有的國內射擊場域無法滿足多域戰場（例如無人機、電子戰、網路戰）所需的巨大空間要求，因此設立外部測試基地至關重要。文章指出，非洲，特別是摩洛哥，因其開闊的地形、蓬勃發展的無人機產業、穩定性以及正在發展的本土國防工業基礎，成為理想的選址。從戰略角度來看，建立這些實驗室能使美國驗證先進的作戰概念、加速軍事現代化，並構建具韌性的夥伴供應鏈。最終，此項能力將作為強大的威懾訊號，向中國展示美國投射力量和對競爭對手施加全球成本的能力。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.