ThinkTankWeekly

New World New Rules: Global Cooperation in a World of Geopolitical Rivalries

Foreign Affairs | 2026-04-21 | economy

Topics: Climate, Trade

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

The analysis argues that while global multilateral economic institutions (IMF, World Bank, WTO) are failing to adapt to modern challenges like climate change and digital innovation, preserving and updating them remains critical due to global interdependence. Cooperation is shown to be effective when countries share a clear understanding of a problem, establish transparent processes, and pool expertise, as demonstrated by successes in bank regulation and tax competition. Consequently, while institutional reform is necessary, policymakers must also prepare for and facilitate action by 'coalitions of willing countries' to safeguard the global commons when established multilateral frameworks prove inadequate.

中文摘要

本分析指出,儘管全球多邊經濟機構(如國際貨幣基金組織、世界銀行、世界貿易組織)在適應氣候變遷和數位創新等現代挑戰方面面臨困境,但由於全球相互依賴性,仍維持和更新這些機構至關重要。研究顯示,當國家能夠就某一問題達成清晰共識、建立透明流程並匯集專業知識時,合作是有效的,這在銀行監管和稅收競爭的成功案例中得到了證明。因此,雖然制度改革是必要的,但政策制定者也必須為「意願國家聯盟」的行動做好準備並促進,以確保當既有的多邊框架不足時,仍能保護全球公共財。

Related Entries

  1. 1.
    2026-09-18 | health | 2026-W38 | Topics: AI, China, United States

    The ongoing Ebola outbreak in the DRC serves as a critical warning that the global health security system is fundamentally unprepared for future biological threats. The difficulty in containing this outbreak is compounded by the rising risk of emerging pathogens and the growing potential for AI misuse in bioweapon development. Policy must therefore shift from reactive, crisis-driven funding to sustained, proactive investment in resilient public health infrastructure, particularly in conflict zones. Addressing this requires strengthening global surveillance, ensuring consistent international cooperation, and mitigating the intersection of conflict, climate change, and disease spread.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  2. 2.
    2026-09-18 | defense | 2026-W38 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that modern conflicts are increasingly defined by attrition, driven by three strategic gaps: the difference between nominal military power and usable capacity; the difficulty of achieving breakthroughs in a technologically advanced battlefield; and the detachment of military means from clear political objectives. Evidence from Ukraine and the Middle East demonstrates that sustained logistics, rapid technological adaptation, and proxy networks are now more decisive than sheer military size. For policymakers, this implies a strategic shift away from seeking short, decisive victories toward preparing for prolonged, high-cost engagements, requiring a focus on sustainable supply chains and defining concrete, attainable political end-states.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  3. 3.
    2026-09-18 | economy | 2026-W38 | Topics: China, Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    Congress has significantly expanded presidential tariff authority by passing the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026, allowing the executive to impose up to 100% tariffs on key buyers of Russian energy and sanctions enablers. The article argues that this legislation represents a dangerous abdication of Congress's Article I authority, as it grants the executive vast, discretionary power without specifying criteria for enforcement. Historically, the executive could claim tariffs were its own doing; however, by writing and passing this new authority, Congress now owns the resulting trade policy and its economic consequences. This shift implies that future tariffs will be viewed by the public as a direct legislative action, potentially undermining the administration's credibility and creating political vulnerability.

    Read at CATO

  4. 4.
    2026-09-17 | economy | 2026-W38 | Topics: Middle East, Russia, Trade, United States

    Cuba is on a trajectory toward an accelerating state and economic collapse, risking a point of no return. The state is deteriorating into "authoritarian anarchy," retaining its capacity for political repression but losing the ability to provide basic public services like health and safety. Economically, while the private sector is growing, this expansion is highly unequal, fueling cronyism and widening class gaps between the elite and the poor. If the current trend continues, the country risks calcifying these defects into a dysfunctional baseline, severely diminishing the chances of a stable, democratic transition.

    Read at Foreign Affairs

  5. 5.
    2026-09-17 | china_indopacific | 2026-W38 | Topics: China, Europe, Russia, Trade

    The article argues that China's ongoing purges are not signs of weakness, but rather a sophisticated, historically rooted process of 'rectification' that strengthens the CCP's grip on power. This mechanism requires cadres to submit mandatory self-criticisms and build permanent, detailed personnel files (dossiers). This system of record-keeping is the CCP's primary source of resilience, creating profound, internalized discipline that controls internal dissent. Policymakers must recognize that the regime's durability stems from this deep internal control mechanism, making succession—rather than internal purges—the ultimate strategic vulnerability.

    Read at Foreign Affairs