The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
Iran’s New Grand Strategy
English Summary
This Foreign Affairs article, dated June 2026, argues that the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran has inadvertently strengthened the Islamic Republic, leading to a fundamental shift in its strategy. Initially intended to cripple Iran, the conflict instead fostered innovation and adaptation within the country, resulting in a more confident and strategically astute leadership. Key to this transformation is a new generation of Iranian officials – primarily from the IRGC – who, hardened by decades of war and lacking the insecurity of the revolution’s founders, prioritize pragmatic statecraft and national defense over ideological grandstanding. This shift represents a move away from revolutionary rhetoric and towards a more calculated approach to regional influence and geopolitical strategy.
中文摘要
這篇《外交事務》雜誌（2026年6月發佈）的文章論述，美國與以色列對伊朗的戰爭無意中強化了該伊斯蘭共和國，導致其戰略產生了根本性轉變。最初旨在削弱伊朗的行動，反而在國內推動了創新和適應，使該國領導層變得更加自信且戰略上更加精明。促成這一變革的關鍵是新一代的伊朗官員，主要來自國防革命衛隊（IRGC），他們在數十年的戰爭中磨練，並不像革命的創始人那樣缺乏不安全感，因此，他們更重視務實的國事操練和國家防禦，而非意識形態上的誇張言論。這一轉變意味著從革命口號轉向更為精準的對地區影響力和地緣政治戰略的應對。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.