ThinkTankWeekly

The Hidden Path to Regime Change in Iran

Foreign Affairs | 2026-07-28 | middle_east

Topics: Middle East, Nuclear, Trade, United States

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

The analysis argues that external military strikes or crippling sanctions are ineffective for achieving regime change in Iran, citing the recent conflict as evidence that such actions strengthen hardline leadership and nationalistic support. Instead, democratization is most likely to occur following a diplomatic settlement that removes economic misery and stabilizes the international environment. The report suggests focusing on internal conditions—such as socioeconomic development and civil society—and advocating for post-conflict strategies that allow democratic forces to grow without relying on military pressure. Therefore, policy efforts should prioritize de-escalation and building pathways for institutional reform rather than continued confrontation.

中文摘要

本分析指出,外部軍事打擊或嚴厲制裁無法實現伊朗的政權變革。援引近期衝突作為證據,此類行動反而鞏固了強硬派領導層和民族主義支持。相反地,民主化最有可能發生在達成外交和解、消除經濟困境並穩定國際環境之後。報告建議應著重於內部條件——例如社會經濟發展與公民社會——並倡導衝突後策略,讓民主力量得以成長而不依賴軍事壓力。因此,政策努力應優先考慮降級升溫(de-escalation)和建立制度改革的途徑,而非持續的對抗。

Related Entries

  1. 1.

    The rapid financing of the AI boom through massive corporate debt issuance is creating significant stress on global financial markets. This influx of private capital forces competition with government Treasury bonds, as AI companies offer higher yields than equivalent sovereign debt, thereby pushing up long-term interest rates. While this signals strong investment demand for AI, it raises concerns about systemic risk and the potential destabilization of core bond markets. Policymakers must navigate the tension between fueling critical technological growth and maintaining stable public borrowing costs to prevent a financial crisis.

    Read at CFR

  2. 2.
    2026-09-02 | europe | 2026-W36 | Topics: United States

    The article argues that while Ratko Mladić was convicted for the Srebrenica genocide, a second alleged campaign targeting Bosnian Muslims in six municipalities during 1992 is crucial to understanding his full criminal scope. Although the main trial judges acquitted him on the 1992 charge due to legal difficulties proving 'specific intent,' two dissenting appeals judges strongly argued that Mladić's high level of command and knowledge implied genocidal intent. This case highlights both the immense challenge in establishing genocide under international law—particularly proving specific intent—and underscores the critical importance of reviewing dissenting judicial opinions for setting future precedents in war crimes accountability.

    Read at CFR

  3. 3.
    2026-09-02 | europe | 2026-W36 | Topics: Climate, Europe, NATO, Nuclear, Russia, Ukraine

    The Chatham House report argues that climate change represents Europe's greatest systemic security threat, citing recent extreme heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires that have caused massive economic losses, infrastructure failures, and excess deaths. These environmental shocks disrupt critical services (like energy supply) and increase vulnerability to non-conventional threats, forcing military resources to divert personnel away from traditional defense roles. To counter this, the report mandates a comprehensive security approach: treating climate adaptation as core national security spending, accelerating decarbonization to address root causes, and building robust societal resilience through coordinated civil preparedness.

    Read at Chatham House

  4. 4.
    2026-09-02 | middle_east | 2026-W36 | Topics: Europe, Middle East, Nuclear, United States

    Six months after the U.S.-Israel attack on Iran, experts conclude that Washington has suffered a strategic defeat due to underestimating Iran's resilience and capacity for resistance. The conflict has significantly heightened regional instability, fueling sophisticated online propaganda from Tehran that creates a dangerous content advantage for radicalization efforts against U.S. interests. Furthermore, the war is paradoxically benefiting Turkey, which is consolidating its power through new regional security agreements, thus reducing overall U.S. influence in the Middle East. Policymakers must urgently counter Iran's ideological warfare and prepare for a shifting balance of power that diminishes American hegemony.

    Read at CFR

  5. 5.
    2026-09-02 | economy | 2026-W36 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Cybersecurity, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Trade, United States

    The widespread operational embedding of AI in global supply chains creates significant systemic dependencies on shared digital infrastructure, raising novel aggregation risks for the insurance market. These risks are not limited to model failure but stem from common vulnerabilities—such as shared cloud platforms or flawed models—that could simultaneously impact multiple seemingly independent firms. Policy implications require both operators and insurers to shift focus toward managing these interconnected weaknesses by establishing robust controls, including mandatory human oversight, detailed audit trails, and staged deployments. Insurers must update underwriting practices to map systemic technology dependencies across policyholders rather than treating AI exposure as a standalone risk.

    Read at RAND