The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
The Holodomor in Politics, Memory, and History: Cognitive, Interpretive, and Explanatory Challenges
English Summary
The article argues that the current national framing of the Holodomor as a deliberate genocide, while politically potent, creates significant cognitive and interpretive challenges for objective historical scholarship. The author notes that while the prevailing narrative emphasizes deliberate intent, reliable evidence suggests the famine may have been a catastrophic miscalculation, not a planned extermination. This elevation of the narrative to 'sacred memory' risks transforming academic history into a political conflict, thereby obscuring complex factors, such as the role of local officials in the famine's execution. Policymakers should recognize that the politicization of historical memory in the region complicates efforts toward balanced scholarly understanding and stable diplomatic dialogue.
中文摘要
本文論述，當前將大饑荒（Holodomor）定調為蓄意種族滅絕的國家敘事，雖然在政治上具有巨大影響力，卻對客觀的歷史學研究造成了重大的認知和詮釋挑戰。作者指出，儘管主流敘事強調了蓄意性，但可靠的證據顯示，這場饑荒可能是一場災難性的誤判，而非有計劃的滅絕行為。將此敘事提升至「神聖記憶」的層面，有使學術史學淪為政治衝突的風險，從而掩蓋了複雜的因素，例如地方官員在饑荒執行過程中的角色。政策制定者應認識到，該地區歷史記憶的政治化，複雜化了實現平衡學術理解和穩定外交對話的努力。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
China's economic strategy is characterized by a persistent 'economics of denial,' prioritizing massive state-directed investment in advanced technology over addressing weak domestic consumption. This approach is rooted in a flawed belief that controlling physical capital will automatically generate productivity and wage growth, ignoring the structural imbalance where domestic demand consistently falls short of supply. This overinvestment and underconsumption model is unsustainable. Consequently, Beijing's policies will continue to generate global deflationary pressures and escalating trade friction, necessitating a fundamental pivot toward consumption-led growth for long-term stability.
-
4.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.