ThinkTankWeekly

How Multilateralism Can Survive

Foreign Affairs | 2026-01-02 | diplomacy

Topics: Trade, United States, Diplomacy

Visit original source

ThinkTankWeekly provides a curated entry and summary only. Full text and PDF remain on the publisher's website.

English Summary

The article analyzes the severe vulnerability of multilateral institutions to unilateral actions by major powers, citing recent hypothetical US withdrawals from key global accords, including the Paris Climate Accord, WHO, and WTO. This trend of institutional erosion poses a significant threat to global cooperation and established international norms. For multilateralism to survive, the global community must address the systemic weaknesses that allow nationalistic policies to undermine collective action. Policy strategies must focus on strengthening institutional resilience and developing mechanisms to enforce international commitments against political headwinds.

中文摘要

本文分析了多邊機構對於主要大國單邊行動所面臨的嚴重脆弱性,並以美國近期假設性退出巴黎氣候協定、世界衛生組織(WHO)和世界貿易組織(WTO)等關鍵全球協定為例。這種制度性侵蝕的趨勢,對全球合作和既有的國際規範構成了重大威脅。為使多邊主義得以存續,全球社群必須解決那些允許國家民族主義政策破壞集體行動的系統性弱點。政策策略必須著重於強化機構的韌性,並發展機制以抵抗政治阻力,確保國際承諾得以落實。

Related Entries

  1. 1.
    2026-05-18 | diplomacy | 2026-W20 | Topics: Diplomacy

    The conversation likely emphasized the critical need for a unified American foreign policy approach to navigate escalating global geopolitical risks. Key arguments centered on the necessity of strengthening traditional alliances and adapting to shifting power dynamics, particularly concerning major rivals. The discussion highlighted that maintaining global stability requires robust diplomatic engagement alongside modernized defense capabilities. Policymakers must therefore prioritize strategic investments in allied partnerships and regional security frameworks to counter revisionist state actions.

    Read at CFR

  2. 2.

    The article outlines how a successful modern foreign policy career requires blending traditional diplomatic expertise with private sector acumen. Juster's career trajectory—from international law to high-stakes diplomacy (e.g., the Gulf War) and subsequently to the technology sector—demonstrates this synthesis. Key evidence includes his work managing complex negotiations under duress and his involvement in co-founding the U.S.-India High Technology Group. The implication for policy is that effective geopolitical strategy must actively integrate private sector knowledge and technological considerations to manage modern economic and security challenges.

    Read at CFR

  3. 3.
    2026-05-18 | economy | 2026-W20 | Topics: Europe, United States, Economy

    The Brookings report argues that closing long-term fiscal deficits cannot be achieved solely by taxing high earners or corporations. Analysis shows that the required savings necessitate broad-based tax increases that would significantly impact middle and lower-income families, as targeted taxes on the wealthy are insufficient. The report notes that high-tax OECD nations achieve high revenues through broad consumption taxes (like VAT) rather than exclusively through highly progressive taxes on the rich. Consequently, any major tax-funded deficit solution would impose a substantial burden on the working class, potentially without the comprehensive social benefits enjoyed by European counterparts.

    Read at Brookings

  4. 4.
    2026-05-18 | china_indopacific | 2026-W20 | Topics: AI, China, Climate, Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East, Nuclear, Russia, Taiwan, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The analysis concludes that China will hold the upper hand at the upcoming Trump-Xi summit, leveraging its dominance over critical minerals, rare earths, and magnet supply chains. This geopolitical leverage, combined with global instability (such as the Iran conflict), allows Beijing to dictate terms and buy time to consolidate its technological and industrial self-sufficiency. Strategically, the U.S. must avoid granting China a managed equilibrium by maintaining 'maximum pressure' on key sectors like AI and tech, rather than seeking broad agreements that could undermine American leadership.

    Read at CFR

  5. 5.
    2026-05-18 | middle_east | 2026-W20 | Topics: Middle East, Russia, Trade, Ukraine, United States

    The article argues that the ongoing Iran War has triggered a severe global hunger crisis, exacerbated by U.S. aid cuts and policy neglect, pushing millions to the brink of starvation. Key evidence includes the termination of U.S. support in countries like Afghanistan, Somalia, and Yemen, coupled with supply chain disruptions and massive cost increases across the region. Policy recommendations are urgent: the U.S. must immediately deploy its $5.4 billion in unspent humanitarian funds, establish a humanitarian corridor through the Strait of Hormuz, and reinstate life-saving aid to critical nations.

    Read at CFR