The White House (via OMB) strongly protests Congressional efforts within the FY 2027 NDAA to prohibit the purchase of warships from foreign shipyards. The Administration argues that these restrictions undermine national security by limiting flexibility and hindering its strategy of leveraging allied yards, such as in the 'Finland model,' to drive investment into U.S. shipbuilding capacity. This signals a significant policy shift toward integrating international partners into advanced naval construction, suggesting the Pentagon is prepared to bypass traditional domestic build requirements for future combat vessels.
A voluntary export fee (VEF) on pollution: Recovering foreign tax revenue to support US clean manufacturing
English Summary
The article analyzes the impact of the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and proposes a Voluntary Export Fee (VEF) as a strategic U.S. response. The VEF would allow U.S. exporters to pay a voluntary domestic carbon fee, which would then qualify for a credit against the CBAM liabilities levied by the EU. This mechanism redirects projected EU revenue (estimated at up to $400 million annually) back to the U.S. government, providing a politically feasible alternative to a mandatory domestic carbon tax. Implementing the VEF would enable the U.S. to align its trade policy with global decarbonization efforts while simultaneously generating dedicated funds for domestic clean manufacturing and infrastructure.
中文摘要
本文分析了歐盟的碳邊境調整機制（CBAM）帶來的影響，並提出設立「自願出口費用」（VEF）作為美國的戰略回應。該VEF機制將允許美國出口商繳納自願性的國內碳費用，此費用可作為抵扣歐盟徵收的CBAM應繳負債。此機制旨在將預計流入歐盟的收入（估計每年高達4億美元）轉回美國政府，為實施強制性國內碳稅提供了一個政治上可行的替代方案。實施VEF將使美國能夠使其貿易政策與全球脫碳努力保持一致，同時為國內清潔製造和基礎設施生成專門的資金來源。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The Western Pacific remains a highly active theater defined by sustained U.S.-led military exercises and escalating great power competition. Key evidence includes continuous joint operations, such as RIMPAC 2026 in Hawaii and the deployment of CSGs into the South China Sea, juxtaposed with increased naval activity from both China (PLAN task groups) and Russia near Japan's critical straits. These movements underscore a strategic push by non-allied powers to assert presence and challenge regional norms. Policy implications dictate that allied nations must maintain robust multilateral cooperation and interoperability to safeguard freedom of navigation and manage escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific.
-
3.
The article argues that the post-Cold War era of U.S. unipolarity, established by the perceived invincibility demonstrated during the Gulf War, has ended. This decline is driven by globalization and technological diffusion, which have democratized advanced military capabilities, allowing regional actors to challenge major powers. Consequently, policymakers must prepare for a more volatile international order marked by frequent crises, heightened costs for securing global trade chokepoints, and reduced predictability from American power. The new rules dictate that great powers can no longer effortlessly impose their will through force.
-
4.
The article argues that current market borrowing costs are rising independently of the Federal Reserve's policy stance, challenging the assumption that the Fed controls all rates. Evidence shows significant increases in key rates—such as 2-year Treasuries and mortgages—even while the effective federal funds rate remains steady. This divergence occurs because market rates reflect complex factors like inflation expectations, credit risk, and geopolitical volatility, which are outside the central bank's direct control. Policymakers should therefore recognize that sustainable rate moderation requires credible disinflation and disciplined government budgets, rather than relying solely on Fed intervention.
-
5.
Despite recent trade setbacks, the U.S. retains fundamental structural economic leverage over China, particularly in high-tech sectors and intermediate goods. While Beijing can temporarily weaponize specific resources like rare earths, these chokepoints are vulnerable to diversification efforts by the West. The article argues that the most effective strategy is not unilateral action but coordinated multilateral pressure from U.S. allies across Asia and Europe. Washington must therefore coordinate its economic statecraft with partners to maximize damage to China’s export-dependent model.