The article argues that recent executive overreach and politicization have severely undermined established norms of U.S. civil-military relations. To restore professional standards, the incoming Congress must actively exercise its oversight powers, moving beyond mere criticism to demanding transparency in defense policy and personnel decisions. Key reforms include enforcing meritocratic promotion processes, requiring documented justification for senior officer removals, and preventing the partisan use of the military. These actions are crucial for bolstering public trust and ensuring the military remains a nonpartisan instrument of civilian control.
The FCC Wants to Police Your Polls
English Summary
The article argues that the FCC's attempt to regulate 'fake' polls and journalistic ethics constitutes an unconstitutional overreach designed to chill political speech. The author asserts that the FCC lacks the authority to judge journalistic standards or determine if polls constitute election interference, arguing that the public interest standard is subjective and prone to political abuse. The piece highlights the dangerous discrepancy between broadcast censorship and the freedom of speech in print or online media. For policy, the author advocates for removing the FCC's regulatory powers over speech, suggesting that the broadcast spectrum should be treated as a tradable property right rather than a government-managed resource.
中文摘要
本文主張，聯邦通信委員會（FCC）試圖規範「虛假」民調和新聞學倫理的行為，構成了一種違憲的越權行為，其目的在於壓制政治言論。作者指出，FCC缺乏判斷新聞學標準或認定民調是否構成選舉干預的權力，並認為「公眾利益標準」本身具有主觀性，容易遭受政治濫用。文章強調了廣播審查與印刷或線上媒體言論自由之間存在的危險落差。在政策層面，作者主張應取消FCC對言論的監管權力，建議將廣播頻譜視為可交易的財產權，而非政府管理的資源。
Related Entries
-
1.
-
2.
The article argues that Donald Trump's unique and prolonged lame-duck period, coupled with domestic political pressures, makes him dangerously prone to international instability. Having exhausted major diplomatic gambits, Trump is expected to channel his energy into high-stakes, unilateral actions, primarily targeting adversaries such as Iran and Cuba. These potential actions—ranging from fresh strikes in the Persian Gulf to attempts at regime change—carry a significant risk of destabilizing regional security and triggering a global economic crisis. Policymakers must anticipate this pivot to high-risk foreign policy to mitigate potential international flare-ups.
-
3.
The Blue Wave signals significant voter frustration with cost of living and inflation, giving Congress a mandate to prioritize affordability and cost-reduction measures. Economically, the rapid build-out of AI data centers is creating localized stress, driving up skilled labor wages and straining resources, while also facing constraints from power grids and potential local regulatory backlash. Policymakers must manage this 'sequencing issue'—addressing rising costs before full productivity gains from AI can materialize—and anticipate shifts in global data center infrastructure as the market matures.
-
4.
The built environment workforce, comprising 15.3 million workers across 95 occupations, is foundational to modern infrastructure and economic stability. While highly paid, the workforce suffers from significant demographic imbalances, being disproportionately white and male, and often lacking clear career progression pathways. To prevent project delays and cost overruns, policy must mandate that capital asset owners treat labor market forecasting as core to project planning. Strategic interventions are required to strengthen career pipelines through robust apprenticeships, improve retention, and actively recruit younger and more diverse workers.
-
5.
The U.S. is drastically reducing core funding to multilateral institutions, withdrawing from numerous bodies due to perceived misalignment with national interests. While multilateral channels offer critical advantages—such as pooling resources for global public goods and managing risk in fragile settings—the U.S.'s funding remains heavily 'earmarked,' which effectively 'bilateralizes' the system and undermines shared burden-sharing. This practice, coupled with deep cuts, diminishes the multilateral system's effectiveness and efficiency, particularly in humanitarian aid. Policy recommendations suggest the U.S. must adopt a systematic, published strategy for aid channel choice and shift from restrictive project-level earmarking to broader thematic funding to restore global cooperation.